'Learn to spell...... free software for every operating system. ' Hey, look why do I need to learn to spell when there's free software for every OS?
And funny enough, KSpell has just broken, until it's fixed you'll have to put up with tripe. So, what are you waiting for, go fix the spell checker so you don't have to see tripe like that again. I would fix it, but then again I can spell so I wouldn't know if it was fixed or not.
Fuck me, this is fucking exceltnet those cunts have fucking been trying to fuck me over this fucking cunt of a radio fucking station that some wankers and I have been fucking around with the idea of for fuck-knows how long.
At fucking last, all the wankers have to do is get the fucker off the ground. Jew.
Did you know that once a month their is a run from scots weapons shop to the armoury.
I can tell you that the vehical is usually packed full of mill-grade weapons and ammo, and is a much easier target than the shop, as it has no security, or cameras.
With some of the weapons you would easly be able to kill someone giving a speach to a large crowed from a mile away.
I would also like you to konw that the presedent is giving a speach this comming monday, the day after the shop is due to take another delivery.
I can't possibly see how this infomration may be of use to you, but I thought I'd tell you anyway.
Well, the problem with DRM is that it removes copyright regulations and replaces them with never copy regulations. I would suggest contacting you local representitive and pointing out that DRM breaks copyright laws by abolishing them.
It's not like I can't get hold of all this stuff.. And if you do a bit of searching there are a lot of companies who sell broadcast quality public domain footage. It's very hard to argue that their taking money from the studios, since thet studios could easly under cut them. ($250 for DVCAM Bettie Boop cartoons!, It may be worth buying some of thease and setting up a public and free archive!)
And Elvis has just started to come out of copyright in the UK, beatles will start to be out of copyright in about 5 years?
What happens when they put DRM(including CSS) on something that's already public domain, like Charlie Chaplin?
Ok, so I can make personal copies. But what happened in 70+ years when the material is out of copyright. How do I make the unlimited copies I would then have the right to make.
1024bit encryption should keep sam busy until say, you dead so it doesn't matter any more.
Complexity isn't too much of an issue either as I doubt it will be long before CPU's start getting special operations (like SDD and MMX) to handle large bit encryption. AMD have been keen to promote how fast their processors are in this area.
As for uncle sam using alien tech to crack the code, you've been listening to too much propaganda.
The war in Iraq has taught us a few things about the government. 1: Their intelligence is shit. no WMD, no 'put anything that they said there was here'...
2: They cant crack codes faster that anyone else, remember the PC they found with an 56bit? encrypted HDD, they brute forced it in a few days, it would have taken you or I a month or so, so their tech is just as good as everyone else's.
3: Their intelligence is shit, most of the 'terrorists' they have caught, aren't, they just pick up anyone who mentions taking out bush.
4: Their intelligence is shit, they haven't found bin-laden, is he using a alien tech cloaking device?
5: Their tech is shit, they couldn't even work out if tapes were of bin-laden. So much for voice printing and bioinformatrix.
6: It doesn't matter if they find anything on your PC anyhow so long as they thought that someday you may put something their that would be good enough.
Your government can't be trusted, not because it spy's on you, but because it lies and makes things up. I don't even think it trusts itself!
I've just started up moz (it's been a while) and I'm surprised that they even bothered putting the extra search box in that isn't big enough and gets in the way.
I can't see how they though it was easier to use then a great big button with the word search written on it.
Having two possible text input boxes instead of one is a big step in the wrong direction.
someones already raised the bug and it got the usual , it hurts me head to think about this one, won't fix, should be an extension.
Anything above 32 and changes are you have aspergers. This may have a very limmited effect on you life e.g. 'thinking that taking a pint of milk is the same as taking $10 million from a pension fund' or it may be a little more pronounced, people may treat you as a little childish from time to time, or you may not get on with other people quite as well as you could do.
Unfortunatlly it's the social stigma that everyone else has that causes problems, and not really the effects of aspergers.
If you think that this seems to ring a bell you can contact a professional who can further advise you.
The bottle of milk and $10 million question. 'Most' people would say that taking a bottle of milk is a 'lesser' crime that taking $10 million because.
1: Taking a bottle of milk is less premeditated than taking $10 million, i.e. you have to put in a lot of thought over a long period of time to take $10 million, but taking a bottle of milk require next to no thought.
2: Someone who is in a position where they would take a bottle of milk probably has a poor quality of life and may be 'hungry', someone in a position to take $10 million probably has a good job with good pay and has no real reason for the $10 million apart from greed.
I would argue that the difference between QM and relativity is semantics since both can be shown, it just depends upon your viewpoint.
'Your reasoning would allow one to say that because we don't know how something works, angels must pass the signal between the particles. Just substitute "angel" for "collapsed dimension"'
This is my point.. so if Angels don't work here where do they work?
Why would Occam's razor require there not to be a signal, apart from QM being the only thing requiring action-at-a-distance, you suggested that the other particle has pre-cognition of what was happening, doesn't that fall under Occam's razor too?
'You're misusing science to support your assertions, I am just pointing out the mistakes.'
Even with my mistakes I can support my assertions better than you can support yours "don't find believing in God that difficult actually.".
I don't need to be able to resolve relativity and quantum mechanics, or even pick out the 'finer' points of micro/macro particle physics to refer to an effect 'Quantum Entanglement' which if we knew how it worked would probably help solve many of the unknowns about the universe (maybe even dark matter etc...)
The effect of Quantum Entanglement is so 'strange' that it is on an equivalent strangeness to other things that have lead people to believe in God/s(I've had creationist living round the corner before). Now at some point, even if it's no believing in God requires that their is something 'out their' that we can never understand (or we would also be God). So how far do we go, once we've solve Quantum Entanglement, dark matter and everything else that people putting in the 'too weird to be certain' box will God just vanish in a puff of smoke?
Oh, good and evil. I'll use a short form of your electron.
An electron is no good and evil, they are both concepts in a monotheistic religion, reason shows the exact opposite, and electron that just goes about it's own business.
We are nothing more than the sum of our particals etc... good and evil has no place in the QM world, or in the world of relativity, so you'd have to suggest that their is another greater world, the world of good and evil, but then that would be the same as the angels carrying my entangled message.
You should be more modest before making assertions like "I don't find believing in God that difficult actually", and then missing the point. So why do you not find believing in God that difficult, not that you do believe in God but entertaining the idea is just about belief.
Slashdot Mirror
I would disagree, they don't have any right to prevent you getting copy if you want one.
I want a copy of something, if you won't sell it to me I'll find other ways of getting it, it's hardly my fault that you won't sell it.
Limited release is just a form of racketeering and price fixing, which is aginst the law.
I don't think europe went through a revolution just so we can get landlords back.
'Learn to spell...... free software for every operating system. ' Hey, look why do I need to learn to spell when there's free software for every OS?
And funny enough, KSpell has just broken, until it's fixed you'll have to put up with tripe.
So, what are you waiting for, go fix the spell checker so you don't have to see tripe like that again. I would fix it, but then again I can spell so I wouldn't know if it was fixed or not.
Fuck me, this is fucking exceltnet those cunts have fucking been trying to fuck me over this fucking cunt of a radio fucking station that some wankers and I have been fucking around with the idea of for fuck-knows how long.
At fucking last, all the wankers have to do is get the fucker off the ground.
Jew.
Did you know that once a month their is a run from scots weapons shop to the armoury.
I can tell you that the vehical is usually packed full of mill-grade weapons and ammo, and is a much easier target than the shop, as it has no security, or cameras.
With some of the weapons you would easly be able to kill someone giving a speach to a large crowed from a mile away.
I would also like you to konw that the presedent is giving a speach this comming monday, the day after the shop is due to take another delivery.
I can't possibly see how this infomration may be of use to you, but I thought I'd tell you anyway.
Why can he buy a DVD as soon as the film is finished? I'd say he's being fucked over.
Public domian elvis just like motzart bring music to my ears.
Well, the problem with DRM is that it removes copyright regulations and replaces them with never copy regulations. I would suggest contacting you local representitive and pointing out that DRM breaks copyright laws by abolishing them.
It's not like I can't get hold of all this stuff..
And if you do a bit of searching there are a lot of companies who sell broadcast quality public domain footage. It's very hard to argue that their taking money from the studios, since thet studios could easly under cut them. ($250 for DVCAM Bettie Boop cartoons!, It may be worth buying some of thease and setting up a public and free archive!)
And Elvis has just started to come out of copyright in the UK, beatles will start to be out of copyright in about 5 years?
What happens when they put DRM(including CSS) on something that's already public domain, like Charlie Chaplin?
I would have thought that music copying has been going on ever since music was invented.
Well get instructions printed off, go to your local music store.
insert 'how to copy this cd' instructions in the display stand.
Ok, so I can make personal copies. But what happened in 70+ years when the material is out of copyright.
How do I make the unlimited copies I would then have the right to make.
DRM = no more public domain.
Unless of course it's a company that's done the killing.
'And yeah, I concur with tmpfs for /tmp. I'd make it default for all distros.'
Great until you try to rip a dvd and need 8Gb of space!
Flashram degrades i.e. you have a limited number of writes.
Use standard ram with a battery backup so that it doesn't loose its' state.
Having to recharge every month or two shouldn't be a problem and we all keep regular backups don't we?
Jesus, give me a tinfoil hat.
...
1024bit encryption should keep sam busy until say, you dead so it doesn't matter any more.
Complexity isn't too much of an issue either as I doubt it will be long before CPU's start getting special operations (like SDD and MMX) to handle large bit encryption. AMD have been keen to promote how fast their processors are in this area.
As for uncle sam using alien tech to crack the code, you've been listening to too much propaganda.
The war in Iraq has taught us a few things about the government.
1: Their intelligence is shit. no WMD, no 'put anything that they said there was here'
2: They cant crack codes faster that anyone else, remember the PC they found with an 56bit? encrypted HDD, they brute forced it in a few days, it would have taken you or I a month or so, so their tech is just as good as everyone else's.
3: Their intelligence is shit, most of the 'terrorists' they have caught, aren't, they just pick up anyone who mentions taking out bush.
4: Their intelligence is shit, they haven't found bin-laden, is he using a alien tech cloaking device?
5: Their tech is shit, they couldn't even work out if tapes were of bin-laden. So much for voice printing and bioinformatrix.
6: It doesn't matter if they find anything on your PC anyhow so long as they thought that someday you may put something their that would be good enough.
Your government can't be trusted, not because it spy's on you, but because it lies and makes things up. I don't even think it trusts itself!
I've just started up moz (it's been a while) and I'm surprised that they even bothered putting the extra search box in that isn't big enough and gets in the way.
I can't see how they though it was easier to use then a great big button with the word search written on it.
Having two possible text input boxes instead of one is a big step in the wrong direction.
someones already raised the bug and it got the usual , it hurts me head to think about this one, won't fix, should be an extension.
If you encrypt the data you don't even have to reboot, you just have to destroy the key.
'should the reason for the crime make any difference in the sentencing of that criminal'
Yes I think it should, as an example.
If a bolder falls down the side of the hill and kills someone then it's not murder since the boldier had no knowledge of what it was doing.
If I get a stick and beat someone to death then it would be murder since I know what I'm doing.
I believe that we should 'punish' people for what they have done wrong, their wrong doing can only be dertermined by the mallice involved.
I don't think anyone would suggest that we should be putting bolders in prison.
Anything above 32 and changes are you have aspergers. This may have a very limmited effect on you life e.g. 'thinking that taking a pint of milk is the same as taking $10 million from a pension fund' or it may be a little more pronounced, people may treat you as a little childish from time to time, or you may not get on with other people quite as well as you could do.
Unfortunatlly it's the social stigma that everyone else has that causes problems, and not really the effects of aspergers.
If you think that this seems to ring a bell you can contact a professional who can further advise you.
The bottle of milk and $10 million question.
'Most' people would say that taking a bottle of milk is a 'lesser' crime that taking $10 million because.
1: Taking a bottle of milk is less premeditated than taking $10 million, i.e. you have to put in a lot of thought over a long period of time to take $10 million, but taking a bottle of milk require next to no thought.
2: Someone who is in a position where they would take a bottle of milk probably has a poor quality of life and may be 'hungry', someone in a position to take $10 million probably has a good job with good pay and has no real reason for the $10 million apart from greed.
Better start saving for a broom and pinny then.
They didn't manage to find 10 exploits each, either they didn't try to hard or there's no way they would have had time to submit updates.
I would argue that the difference between QM and relativity is semantics since both can be shown, it just depends upon your viewpoint.
'Your reasoning would allow one to say that because we don't know how something works, angels must pass the signal between the particles. Just substitute "angel" for "collapsed dimension"'
This is my point.. so if Angels don't work here where do they work?
Why would Occam's razor require there not to be a signal, apart from QM being the only thing requiring action-at-a-distance, you suggested that the other particle has pre-cognition of what was happening, doesn't that fall under Occam's razor too?
'You're misusing science to support your assertions, I am just pointing out the mistakes.'
Even with my mistakes I can support my assertions better than you can support yours "don't find believing in God that difficult actually.".
I don't need to be able to resolve relativity and quantum mechanics, or even pick out the 'finer' points of micro/macro particle physics to refer to an effect 'Quantum Entanglement' which if we knew how it worked would probably help solve many of the unknowns about the universe (maybe even dark matter etc...)
The effect of Quantum Entanglement is so 'strange' that it is on an equivalent strangeness to other things that have lead people to believe in God/s(I've had creationist living round the corner before). Now at some point, even if it's no believing in God requires that their is something 'out their' that we can never understand (or we would also be God). So how far do we go, once we've solve Quantum Entanglement, dark matter and everything else that people putting in the 'too weird to be certain' box will God just vanish in a puff of smoke?
Oh, good and evil. I'll use a short form of your electron.
An electron is no good and evil, they are both concepts in a monotheistic religion, reason shows the exact opposite, and electron that just goes about it's own business.
We are nothing more than the sum of our particals etc... good and evil has no place in the QM world, or in the world of relativity, so you'd have to suggest that their is another greater world, the world of good and evil, but then that would be the same as the angels carrying my entangled message.
I don't think I need to after reading that review/essay
'a pension fund is the property'
Only if you spend it.
Anyhow, you failed the lameness test. are you autistic or suffering from aspergers syndrome?
There's a test here. I got a score of 17...
Tell me one thing that is evil, or good for that matter.
I'm sorry got a little distracted there.
You should be more modest before making assertions like "I don't find believing in God that difficult actually", and then missing the point. So why do you not find believing in God that difficult, not that you do believe in God but entertaining the idea is just about belief.