haven't you read the bible? god is unchanging: the only thing unchanging is the truth. the truth is always right, the truth is always righteous, if you have good reason then you are innocent. the innocent, the lamb. god is love ergo the truth is love.
let no man buy no sell least he have the mark of the beast.
at some point all digital media will be available for unlimited download by subscription, and eventually via tax. [at least for the people]
A bit like the library, or maybe youtube (as in you pay for the goods that advertise of youtube ergo you pay advertising 'tax' on the goods)
If you can download it for free from youtube, how many times are you going to watch the same damb thing, is it really worth making everyone download it every single time?
first you have a leader, then you have a aim, then you have followers, then you have a church, then you have divine power, then you have a sacrifice, then you have a religion.
I should imagine like all things, the first buyers pay for the development costs, then those who come later on just pay some mark-up on the fabrication costs.
I have my Ford car serviced in lots of places, and some bits aren't ford branded or ford uses bits from other people.
Even the 'electronic' components can be diagnosed by third parties e.g. not ford dealerships, so long as they get the kit from ford.
I can also add lots of other bits to my car and not void the warranty. I don't have to play ford CD's that I buy from Ford 'r' Us. I don't have to buy ford certified maps or ford certified Sat-Nav GPS, and my passengers don't need to learn to speak ford before they can get in the car. I don't have to go to Ford Mart and buy Ford milk, and put in the Ford trunk. I don't have to buy Ford petrol either.
If they have a monopoly on a market (people who own IPhones) and they are restricting competitors products in that market (Android Magazine). Isn't that.... umm... anti-competitive behaviour?
Slashdot Mirror
look at the bible as such,
an attempt at social revolution, and the overthrow of those in power.
god is a metaphor, though some would personify it as a mode of misdirection and a method to overpower you with the will of a false god.
well, seeing society is based on a adoption of the bible by the church, and then government, as a means of controlling the populous.
I think the original source of western government is very applicable.
haven't you read the bible?
god is unchanging: the only thing unchanging is the truth.
the truth is always right,
the truth is always righteous,
if you have good reason then you are innocent.
the innocent, the lamb.
god is love ergo the truth is love.
let no man buy no sell least he have the mark of the beast.
I always thought that those kind of things turned people into violent mass murderers.
no replyability
well property is thief.
Answer, all of the above.
I could have said
well is
youtube, DVB etc.. plugins for instance ripping or downloading or recording and sharing.
point, rip and share.
maybe some darknet intergration,
voip, IM integration.
record that call with you boss and blast it out over the internet.
at some point all digital media will be available for unlimited download by subscription, and eventually via tax. [at least for the people]
A bit like the library, or maybe youtube (as in you pay for the goods that advertise of youtube ergo you pay advertising 'tax' on the goods)
If you can download it for free from youtube, how many times are you going to watch the same damb thing, is it really worth making everyone download it every single time?
first you have a leader,
then you have a aim,
then you have followers,
then you have a church,
then you have divine power,
then you have a sacrifice,
then you have a religion.
it's called misdirection.
there is no head, see it and suck.
open step ahead.
against top down leadership?
ever heard of the word Martyr
oh and that insurance file.
phone equipment (at least in the UK) has to be licensed.
so the government already does it.
but they could require people to have their computers checked for viruses if they are causing a problem.
like an MOT test on a car.
alternatively you could sit a test and DIY.
or the OS could be certified.
it's more like failing a driving test and the government allowing people to use roads if they are bad drivers.
you can use a car off road if you like.
cars are more like computers in the case, and the internet the road.
The government is responsible for licensing people to drive cars on the road.
I should imagine like all things, the first buyers pay for the development costs, then those who come later on just pay some mark-up on the fabrication costs.
umm... not true,
I have my Ford car serviced in lots of places, and some bits aren't ford branded or ford uses bits from other people.
Even the 'electronic' components can be diagnosed by third parties e.g. not ford dealerships, so long as they get the kit from ford.
I can also add lots of other bits to my car and not void the warranty. I don't have to play ford CD's that I buy from Ford 'r' Us. I don't have to buy ford certified maps or ford certified Sat-Nav GPS, and my passengers don't need to learn to speak ford before they can get in the car. I don't have to go to Ford Mart and buy Ford milk, and put in the Ford trunk.
I don't have to buy Ford petrol either.
"'You know... your magazine...It's just about Android.... we can't have that in our App Store.' "
You know, your browser, it's about 'Netscape' we can't have that on Windows.
If they have a monopoly on a market (people who own IPhones)
and they are restricting competitors products in that market (Android Magazine).
Isn't that.... umm... anti-competitive behaviour?
genocide then.
megalomania
insanity is measured by how attached to something you are.
read you citation, duh.
"this is the real world where people want their own stuff,"
your presupposing property.
hmmm... your context is bias.
'theft' as a forcible violation of property presupposes the existence of property.
The parent quite clearly presupposed the existence of property, so the statement was apt.
don't both parties need to be armed for an armed conflict.
Or do you mean war,
in which case 'war crimes' and 'crimes against humanity' are the terms used.
I'd say they've got a pretty good advertising campaign going on without the need to DDOS themselves.