They're not selling it, they're just using it. No one bitches when Random Dude modifies code on his end for his own purposes, why does it matter if it's Random Corp instead?
It's not the router, it's the interface, and most of them are different. Personally, I've avoided Linksys ever since they fubar'd wifi on their consumer routers/APs
Which is to say that C will notify you that you are terrible at programming, rather than let you get away with being terrible because the language(and/or compiler) is more forgiving like Java or VB
And because it's the Bay Area, it's probably NIMBYs. "I don't want my street torn up so you can install fiber, my property value might temporarily decrease". Either way, with bandwidth caps the new rage, this type of service is a risky investment.
I would say from the release of Windows 95 to the release of Office 2007, they were pretty much within their own standard style guidelines for GUI more or less across the board. That would be 12 years, which is a fairly significant amount of time in the computing world.
To be fair, Microsoft is doing the same shit these days. Consistent Windows User Experience Guidelines? No, fuck you, you get ribbons and no start menu you douche, so pay me already.
They exist outside of the market. Any market that includes non-governmental enterprise may conceivably have a patent system regardless of what economic system that entity uses. It's a control on the economic system, but not part of it.
It's probably clearest to say that capitalism is meant to be market darwinism, and whether or not you call it "free" is up to you, since "freedom" is relative.
I think a reference model is a good way to go. Works for many hardware vendors that also license their technology out(notably video card vendors, of course), works for showing what Android can do for Google, etc. No frills, no contract, just a piece of hardware that shines at showing what the base software can do without having all that other crap(Beats Audio, Dolby Surround, ginormous screen, etc) tacked on.
Slashdot Mirror
Because each IE tab is it's own instance(like Chrome). Each FF tab is under the parent process.
Wouldn't those be veteran scripters, not veteran programmers? Or maybe veteran web developers?
No, they're not selling the program. They're using the program as a means to make money. There is nothing wrong with that.
They're not selling it, they're just using it. No one bitches when Random Dude modifies code on his end for his own purposes, why does it matter if it's Random Corp instead?
It's not the router, it's the interface, and most of them are different. Personally, I've avoided Linksys ever since they fubar'd wifi on their consumer routers/APs
Seriously. Wall Street's web platforms rely on ms and ns to beat others for trades. They sure as hell aren't handling this in PHP and ASP
Which is to say that C will notify you that you are terrible at programming, rather than let you get away with being terrible because the language(and/or compiler) is more forgiving like Java or VB
And because it's the Bay Area, it's probably NIMBYs. "I don't want my street torn up so you can install fiber, my property value might temporarily decrease". Either way, with bandwidth caps the new rage, this type of service is a risky investment.
Incorrect. Certain bribes are generally not illegal, such as facilitation payments
I would say from the release of Windows 95 to the release of Office 2007, they were pretty much within their own standard style guidelines for GUI more or less across the board. That would be 12 years, which is a fairly significant amount of time in the computing world.
To be fair, Microsoft is doing the same shit these days. Consistent Windows User Experience Guidelines? No, fuck you, you get ribbons and no start menu you douche, so pay me already.
Isn't this the point of routing the way we do? It's self-healing, of a sort, as long as another path exists.
r/g/gh
done
And if you don't own a computer, you can't even get the source code. How unfair.
They exist outside of the market. Any market that includes non-governmental enterprise may conceivably have a patent system regardless of what economic system that entity uses. It's a control on the economic system, but not part of it.
It's probably clearest to say that capitalism is meant to be market darwinism, and whether or not you call it "free" is up to you, since "freedom" is relative.
Err, patents aren't "capitalism".
When I think of fast databases to compare to, the first thing I think of is MySQL.
/Actually, I'd rather see a comparison to Pick or other lightning fast MV dbs
I take it you hate gaming for Linux, since Intel is worse than Matrox for gaming.
And GPL isn't the only license out there
At least they didn't base their policy on Threads
And if you wanted to download the video of some guy making his cat do tricks?
Indeed. PAE completely blows up Intel Dialogic cards as well.
I think a reference model is a good way to go. Works for many hardware vendors that also license their technology out(notably video card vendors, of course), works for showing what Android can do for Google, etc. No frills, no contract, just a piece of hardware that shines at showing what the base software can do without having all that other crap(Beats Audio, Dolby Surround, ginormous screen, etc) tacked on.
EVER.