Slashdot Mirror


User: SuricouRaven

SuricouRaven's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
11,749
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 11,749

  1. Re:not too surprising on NYPD Dismantling Occupy Wall Street Encampment · · Score: 1

    Unacceptable. Think what Really Really Really Bad could do with ten years in power! Plus they'd entrench so throughly they'd be all but impossible to remove.

  2. Re:not too surprising on NYPD Dismantling Occupy Wall Street Encampment · · Score: 1

    That only works if you believe the two main parties are equally no good. If you believe one of them is Really Bad and the other Really Really Really Bad, then what are you to do? You have to vote for the Really Bad party, lest the even worse one wins.

  3. Re:Something not quite right on NYPD Dismantling Occupy Wall Street Encampment · · Score: 2

    Subtle legal distinctions like that matter a lot. If the park is merely public in practice but private in law, that's completly different from being a legal public park.

  4. Re:not too surprising on NYPD Dismantling Occupy Wall Street Encampment · · Score: 1

    Yes, there are. That's how US politics works. Third-party candidates just are not serious candidates. The last time I checked, there was just a single member of congress not affiliated with one of the big two.

  5. Re:not too surprising on NYPD Dismantling Occupy Wall Street Encampment · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Do what? Politics isn't working very well - there are two parties and both serve the rich. There aren't the numbers or popular support for a revolution, and historically those things tend to turn out rather poorly anyway. The protestors want to do something, but there just isn't much they can.

  6. Re:Something not quite right on NYPD Dismantling Occupy Wall Street Encampment · · Score: 5, Informative

    The only reason the protestors are in the park is because the police made it clear they'll arrest anyone who dares to actually protest near wall street. The park is designated a 'free speech zone' because it's far enough out of the way that no-one will see them.

  7. Re:Dairy is totally pushing it on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    Hmm.... no meat, no eggs, no dairy. So what exactly is it that distinguishes them from vegans?

  8. Re:some proteins are better than others on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    What happens to the bulls? They don't produce milk. I imagine something similar to how male chicks are treated in the egg industry - as soon as the calves are born, the males would be killed.

  9. Re:Dairy is totally pushing it on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    I use a similar line to squick my mother about her 'free range' eggs. In the egg industry, half of all chicks are worthless, as they turn out to be male. Not only meaning no eggs, but not so well-behaved as the hens for meat production too. So for every egg-producing hen, there is a significent lack of a cock... they get killed immediatly after sexing, in the most efficient industrial-line process that could be designed. The industry calls it "instantaneous euthanasia" to try to hide exactly how because the process, while essentially painless due to the sheer speed, is also so violently messy that it would make many potential customers feel ill or - even worse - stop buying eggs.

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/09/01/chicks-being-ground-up-al_n_273652.html -- Some of those smug hippie activist types managed to get a hidden camera in.

  10. Re:some proteins are better than others on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    You can, but only if you know how. An unrestricted diet is a simple matter of stuffing enough plants and some meat down your esophagus - it's not complicated. Vegan diets require you take the time to learn a bit about nutrition and read the labels.

  11. Re:No thanks on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    I think there may be an inbuilt human instinct to class people as 'my tribe' and 'not my tribe.' Deprive people of the chance to discriminate based on race, religion, nationality and such and you'll find the instinct directs elsewhere. Into political polarisation, for example. Or sports team fans. What is a football riot if not an expression of tribal war?

  12. Re:Monsanto on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    Good enough for burgers. Who is going to tell the difference after mincing?

  13. Re:Edible insects on In-Vitro Muscle Cells, It's What's For Dinner · · Score: 1

    Free markets can be powerful things, but they cannot change the laws of physics. There has to be a limit. Even if they build giant dome-fields to reduce water loss, artifically increase the CO2 level inside and apply artificial sunlight at night... though by that point, food would be very expensive.

  14. Re:America is NOT a democracy on The Privatization of Copyright Lawmaking · · Score: 1

    And internet celebrity endorsements.

  15. Re:The flaw in democracy. on The Privatization of Copyright Lawmaking · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They do let the vox populi have it's say on issues on no great importance - thus why one of the biggest political issues of our time is gay marriage. What does gay marriage or the lack thereof actually do? Nothing at all. Which is why politicians love it so. They can pose, they can pander, they can play all their political games and chase votes, but in the end there is no chance they'll actually do anything that might upset the big money.

  16. Re:Privilege of Prosecution. on How Litigation Only Spurred On P2P File Sharing · · Score: 1

    Pirates tend to be very fussy about saving space. They often specify a lower bitrate for the credits, barely enough to read the text, so they can make the files just that little bit smaller.

  17. Re:nonsense on Warner Brothers: Automated Takedown Notices Hit Files That Weren't Ours · · Score: 1

    1) Take it down, right now, no questions.
    2) Become liable for a claim for damages according to the DMCA.

    Unless the recipient is willing to risk great financial loss just to prove a point, it's really no contest.

  18. Re:If they don't own it, then it's not a legal not on Warner Brothers: Automated Takedown Notices Hit Files That Weren't Ours · · Score: 2

    Because it'd be logistically impossible to enforce copyright online to any higher standard than 'that looks a bit dodgy, pull it down.' It's almost impossible to enforce it even with the evidence-free standard of the DMCA.

  19. Re:New physical design. on The Transistor Wars · · Score: 1

    Soldered on is the usual way to connect an Atom. As the Atom is an embedded processor, it's not expected to be upgradeable.

  20. Re:Gimmick on Heavy Duty Electric Unicycle Maker Takes On Segway · · Score: 1

    I recall Snow Crash had cars with wheels like that, though their purpose was to improve performance and comfort on unmaintained, decaying, pothole-cratered roads.

  21. Re:What could possibly go wrong? on Heavy Duty Electric Unicycle Maker Takes On Segway · · Score: 1

    Acceleration should be doable with a good computer control system. Forwards, stop, driver flips forward, then accelerate *hard* before he faceplants. Brakeing would still be a problem though. Brake too hard and you break the driver.

  22. Re:Old News - was on H.A.D. back in Aug on Heavy Duty Electric Unicycle Maker Takes On Segway · · Score: 1

    That windshield is so obviously useless, I wonder if it's sole purpose is to satisfy some strange state motor-safety standard.

  23. Re:saving money on Device Detects Drug Use Via Fingerprints · · Score: 1

    That, and private enforcement. Many companies test their employees routinely.

  24. Re:Shake hands with a junkie on Device Detects Drug Use Via Fingerprints · · Score: 1

    Cyanoacrylate.

    1. Wash hands.
    2. Apply superglue to fingertips.
    3. Wash again.
    It sets instantly on contact with skin and forms a water-impermiable layer to prevent fresh sweat getting through. The only problem is you might be too clean, and a well-programmed tester would recognise an attempted fraud from the complete lack of sweat to test.

  25. Re:How about for paramedics? on Device Detects Drug Use Via Fingerprints · · Score: 1

    I understand the standard practice is for the prosection to offer a plea bargin: "Plead guilty, and we'll go easy. Sure, you'll have a criminal record and a short stay in jail, but that's it. Or you could fight this. Maybe you'll win, maybe you'll lose... and if you lose, we're going to utterly destroy your life, jail you for years, render you unemployable and pry through your personal records for any hint of wrongdoing we can use to add more charges."