you obviously don't realize i post using my real name, and my address is in the white pages. I AM NOT A COWARD, as you would have others believe you expect everyone else to be, presumably because you yourself are a coward and justify it with such beliefs.
way to miss the point. consumers of oil completely destroy the shared resource they rely on. no one else can ever use that oil again. it's GONE.
property rights are only as simple as someone else who claim's those same property rights allows them to be. if you think this is a simple issue, you're an idiot.
how is making motion control seem unnecessarily complicated and unentertaining a bad move when motion control is a prime selling point for your most unique, successful competitor?
it's not about flaws in the spec creating exploit potential... it's about flaws in the implementation of the spec creating exploit potential. if you can't understand the difference, you're an idiot. i can't help you.
in the short term it costs you money because you can't simultaneously do other things to earn money (unless you are paid to sleep). in the long term without sleep your potential to earn goes to zero in a short fixed time. adding in the controversial role of dreaming in regards to future problem solving... you can't be this dumb... you really think that the inability of removing the necessity of sleep in any way invalidates anything i've said or is in any way relevant? AT ALL? you really can't be this stupid.
perhaps you don't understand relativity or the concept of spending money to make money.
you are either an idiot or would have others believe you are.
is your pee hooked because of your crooked dick? STRAIGHTEN IT OUT, PEE HOOK.
eventually 2 distinct services will exists... at the same time the mutually inclusive users will develop a framework with the intent of utilizing both services within a new interface. which "origin" relative to either service does that new interface exist within? this story is pure marketing... slander from the incumbents
when you have things like OpenID and facebook connect running rampant because THERE IS DEMAND, a "more secure platform" that disallows such things has no chance.
my sole point is that this story and any argument about a platform being implicitly insecure is ignorant. HTML5 is not prone to allowing anyone to delete an arbitrary file off of any HTML5 user's computer, as you suggested.
an application implementation of the HTML5 platform layer is itself an application, and then the recursive confusion begins.
this is a MARKETING story... a smear campaign by the incumbents... completely ignorant and irrelevant.
just because a specific group of developers working on a specific implementation of a specific platform layer spec can't securely implement that spec, does not imply anything other than the group of developers is incompetent.
this has absolutely nothing to do with HTML5 as a platform layer spec or as a platform layer implementation... this has everything to do with furthering an acceptance and expectation of incompetent developers.
... which is not specifically relevant in any way to HTML5 or any other specific platform... you missed my entire point, and then suggested i didn't understand the basis of my own argument. you're an idiot.
security is built in the application just as malice is built in the application. the platform is irrelevant.
i mean what i said. security is built in the application. if the platform implements something insecurely, then relying on that implementation is not building a secure application... it doesn't mean that a secure application can not be built on that platform.
i'm confused what makes you glad i have a job, but i'll give you the quantum mechanics 101:
it's not about taking singular steps, it's about taking all possible steps in the same time it would take to take a single step. think about parallel processing... not all applications lend themselves to benefitting from parallelization... in fact, almost all procedural processes can't benefit at all. the same is true for quantum logic.
one of the most important applications of quantum logic is reversing encryption.
i have way more than 5. this way i can not be silenced. i never moderate my own posts, or anyone's posts, as i've never received moderation points. i am working within the confines of the system presented to me.
slashdot was architected by idiots.
1 person does not equal 1 user UNLESS YOU FORCE SUCH RESTRICTIONS.
that is why they are hypocritical... i think they are equating "reality" with "the lies that a significant percentage of the populace is aware of and does not disagree with"...
if you believe the media is powerless, then it is.
back in high school i boosted mine to play a multiplayer asteroids game i made... you could add a couple battery powered IR repeaters disguised as pens throughout the room, and then, using ad hoc networking, you'd have 100% coverage of the room with no contortions required.
my point isn't that people should be doing this... it's that attempting to stop it is a futile endeavor.
Slashdot Mirror
you obviously don't realize i post using my real name, and my address is in the white pages. I AM NOT A COWARD, as you would have others believe you expect everyone else to be, presumably because you yourself are a coward and justify it with such beliefs.
ur mum's face's stupid is showing.
you are NOTHING
property rights are only as simple as someone else who claim's those same property rights allows them to be. if you think this is a simple issue, you're an idiot.
are you going to provide oil to run the hotels for the next 20 years?
does the free market guarantee continued employment, or is the very basis of capitalism the inherent necessity of the value of ADAPTING.
how is making motion control seem unnecessarily complicated and unentertaining a bad move when motion control is a prime selling point for your most unique, successful competitor?
i've seen amazing things, so i'm not going to say it's impossible... but landing on the moon is cake in comparison.
it's not about flaws in the spec creating exploit potential... it's about flaws in the implementation of the spec creating exploit potential. if you can't understand the difference, you're an idiot. i can't help you.
perhaps you don't understand relativity or the concept of spending money to make money.
you are either an idiot or would have others believe you are.
is your pee hooked because of your crooked dick? STRAIGHTEN IT OUT, PEE HOOK.
you are NOTHING
the mention of HTML5 in such a story is irrelevant and the product of a marketing smear campaign run by the HTML vendor incumbents.
eventually 2 distinct services will exists... at the same time the mutually inclusive users will develop a framework with the intent of utilizing both services within a new interface. which "origin" relative to either service does that new interface exist within? this story is pure marketing... slander from the incumbents
when you have things like OpenID and facebook connect running rampant because THERE IS DEMAND, a "more secure platform" that disallows such things has no chance.
an application implementation of the HTML5 platform layer is itself an application, and then the recursive confusion begins.
this is a MARKETING story... a smear campaign by the incumbents... completely ignorant and irrelevant.
straighten you dick, pee hook.
you're STILL nothing.
this has absolutely nothing to do with HTML5 as a platform layer spec or as a platform layer implementation... this has everything to do with furthering an acceptance and expectation of incompetent developers.
you are all idiots.
so the HTML5 spec includes the requirement to delete any file on the host file system?
you idiots are all missing the point.
security is built in the application just as malice is built in the application. the platform is irrelevant.
i mean what i said. security is built in the application. if the platform implements something insecurely, then relying on that implementation is not building a secure application... it doesn't mean that a secure application can not be built on that platform.
it's not about taking singular steps, it's about taking all possible steps in the same time it would take to take a single step. think about parallel processing... not all applications lend themselves to benefitting from parallelization... in fact, almost all procedural processes can't benefit at all. the same is true for quantum logic.
one of the most important applications of quantum logic is reversing encryption.
slashdot was architected by idiots.
1 person does not equal 1 user UNLESS YOU FORCE SUCH RESTRICTIONS.
wrong again... never fails
straighten your dick, pee hook
you are NOTHING
perhaps because they don't exist and you're a liar or an idiot...
you are NOTHING
if you believe the media is powerless, then it is.
you don't catch a hypocrite... you mock them.
my point isn't that people should be doing this... it's that attempting to stop it is a futile endeavor.