Slashdot Mirror


Designing Wireless Sensors To Be Dropped Into Volcanoes

Thorfinn.au writes with this quote from El Reg: "Topflight engineers based in Newcastle have hit upon a radical plan for warning of volcanic eruptions. They intend to build a heatproof sensor unit which can be dropped into a volcano's caldera and wirelessly transmit data to monitoring stations despite being possibly immersed in molten rock. 'At the moment we have no way of accurately monitoring the situation inside a volcano and in fact most data collection actually goes on post-eruption. With an estimated 500 million people living in the shadow of a volcano this is clearly not ideal,' explains Dr. Alton Horsfall of Newcastle Uni's Centre for Extreme Environment Technology. 'We still have some way to go but using silicon carbide technology we hope to develop a wireless communication system that could accurately collect and transmit chemical data from the very depths of a volcano.'"

126 comments

  1. Why? by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    Have we run out of virgins already?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
    1. Re:Why? by MyLongNickName · · Score: 4, Funny

      On Slashdot?! Certainly you jest.

      --
      See my journal for slashdot ID's by year. Mine created in 2005. http://slashdot.org/journal/289875/slashdot-ids-by-year
    2. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Need a fresh supply of virgins?
      Bait the hook for Wesley Crusher types.

      1. Produce project of interest to nerds.
      2. Get article written on it.
      3. Get article posted at Slashdot.
      4. Reel them in as they bite the hook.

    3. Re:Why? by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bait the hook for Wesley Crusher types.

      Except Wesley Crusher got to have sex with Ashley Judd......

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    4. Re:Why? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      Clearly just the ugly ones. No sense in throwing the easy-on-the-eyes ones into a volcano, eh?

    5. Re:Why? by TrisexualPuppy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Forget the virgins. I'm still looking for the unexploded nuclear bombs dropped from the DC-8-like spacecraft.

      I'm sooooo close to OT7, just one more!

    6. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck that, your next pretty boy.

    7. Re:Why? by PPH · · Score: 2, Funny

      The ugly ones go to the martyrs.

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    8. Re:Why? by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

      * Guinness Guys Commercial Voice* BRILLIANT!

    9. Re:Why? by Jurily · · Score: 1

      I'm sooooo close to OT7, just one more!

      You don't have to farm, there's plenty in the AH.

    10. Re:Why? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Well...

      So we at least won't run out of dolhins? (it's a good time to save them while trying to launch the probe apparently, as in "The Devil's Window")

      Also, it might help unciver lost treasures Black Beard the pirate... ("Greed For a Pirate's Dream")

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
    11. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reference.. Xenu threw a bunch of people in a volcano and then killed them off with hydrogen bombs or somesuch nonsense.

    12. Re:Why? by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      You mean, if you blow yourself and a bunch of other denomination mosque goers with a shahid's belt, you end up with 72 uglies? Good to know!

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    13. Re:Why? by eclectro · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      On Slashdot?! Certainly you jest.

      Female virgin. Idiot.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
    14. Re:Why? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It doesn't say that. It says he went on a date with her. And then that his marriage to her was elided from the canon preemptively.

      So, really, you have to flash your table light at least a little for the protectors of the canon for this one.

    15. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Look out - Unobtainium is going to get expensive again.

    16. Re:Why? by fishbowl · · Score: 1

      I wish I had mod points. Maybe I can trade down Triumphs for them?

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    17. Re:Why? by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      It was implied pretty strongly in that episode that they hooked up.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    18. Re:Why? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dang you! I thought I'd be the first to reference the seaQuest.

    19. Re:Why? by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Yuh, like he wouldn't try to imply that even if it didn't happen.

    20. Re:Why? by PPH · · Score: 1

      Of course. The volcano god has recourse if the sacrifice is not satisfactory. For the guy with the bomb belt, there's no refund. Where would you spend your best virgins?

      --
      Have gnu, will travel.
    21. Re:Why? by Coren22 · · Score: 1

      Naa, that's for the nuns to take care of. :)

      --
      APK likes to ask for responses to the same things over and over. Maybe he just likes the responses?
    22. Re:Why? by alpinto · · Score: 1

      what is this all about............. seo services

    23. Re:Why? by sznupi · · Score: 1

      Hey, at least it's less than a decade now, right? Right? (can't help but wonder who will build it though, not that Bridger is gone... ;( )

      --
      One that hath name thou can not otter
  2. Maybe they can find proof of Lord Xenu's crimes by elrous0 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Finally, Scientology will be vindicated!

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    1. Re:Maybe they can find proof of Lord Xenu's crimes by DigitalSorceress · · Score: 4, Informative

      LOL /came here to make some random Xenu comment //leaving satisfied

      --

      The Digital Sorceress
    2. Re:Maybe they can find proof of Lord Xenu's crimes by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I saw the Scientologists at the New York State Fair a few weeks ago. They were offering "free" personality tests and weren't advertising themselves as Scientologists. I figured it out when I saw the stack of Dianetics books behind them. Once I saw that I stood at attention and loudly proclaimed "HAIL LORD XENU!"

      The fuckers have no sense of humor at all. They actually called the damn cops over because of my "harassment". I'm guessing it wasn't the first time they did that because the LEO handled it by pulling me aside and saying "I can't make you leave but could you please leave them alone? I don't want to fill out more paperwork because of them."

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    3. Re:Maybe they can find proof of Lord Xenu's crimes by SnarfQuest · · Score: 0

      Just you wait! Once Scientology buys SCO, all you Linux geeks will have to submit $699 to them, and submit to a personality test and thee weeks of auditing.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    4. Re:Maybe they can find proof of Lord Xenu's crimes by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Its stories like this that make me laugh.
      Scientology cries 'harassment' so often the cops are fed up, seems like only their lawyers care anymore.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  3. Government Conspiracy by sprior · · Score: 1

    This is just the government trying to "pre-bug" those granite slabs right from the quarry.

    1. Re:Government Conspiracy by Speare · · Score: 3, Funny

      This is just the government trying to "pre-bug" those granite slabs right from the quarry.

      Are you saying the government is taking us for granite? I've been saying that for years.

      --
      [ .sig file not found ]
    2. Re:Government Conspiracy by The_mad_linguist · · Score: 1

      Gneiss one.

    3. Re:Government Conspiracy by dfetter · · Score: 1

      You must have been stoned to come up with that. Shale on you!

      --
      What part of "A well regulated militia" do you not understand?
    4. Re:Government Conspiracy by blair1q · · Score: 1

      [Obligatory "full of schist" joke goes here.]

    5. Re:Government Conspiracy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't be so igneous!

    6. Re:Government Conspiracy by slick7 · · Score: 1

      My sediments exactly!

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
  4. I have those already by Drakkenmensch · · Score: 1

    I know a few netgear routers I'd love to punt into a volcano.

    1. Re:I have those already by Pojut · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Only a few? Why not all? ::rimshot::

  5. I don't think so by seven+of+five · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even if the package is heat-proof, the electronics are going to fry.

    1. Re:I don't think so by countSudoku() · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not with advanced oven-mitt technologies! The precious, and every so finicky, electronic components will be as cool as cucumbers in a summer salad!

      --
      This is the NSA, we're gonna geet U h@x0r5! Also, what is a h@x0r5?
    2. Re:I don't think so by robot256 · · Score: 1

      What you need to do is immerse the main part of the electronics in a large vat of parafin and liquid nitrogen that will boil off rapidly but last long enough for the sensor to send back some data.

    3. Re:I don't think so by JTsyo · · Score: 1

      Thin the idea is to leave them there to warn when the volcano has a change in its characteristics. Of course I didn't RTFA.

    4. Re:I don't think so by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1

      If the package is heat-proof, then the temperature of the electronics will stay within its operating range and the device will function normally. Magma is only 1300-2400F.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:I don't think so by PeterM+from+Berkeley · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, they mentioned that they're going to be using a different-than-standard electronic technology based on silicon carbide rather than silicon. Silicon carbide does not decompose until 2730C, per Wikipedia, wereas the Wiki article you mention states that "most" magma is around 1300C or less.

      What I wonder is if you make a conventional CPU out of SiC, you can operate it at a far higher clock because it won't melt itself, thus enabling high performance CPUs or perhaps 3D integration.

      --PeterM

    6. Re:I don't think so by jandrese · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm more curious how they plan to power such a device, and how they plan to wirelessly transmit signals through molten rock.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    7. Re:I don't think so by Locke2005 · · Score: 1

      They're collecting data on the way down though the air. I'm pretty sure you can't transmit through lava anyway; once they hit the surface, they're toast.

      --
      I've abandoned my search for truth; now I'm just looking for some useful delusions.
    8. Re:I don't think so by 0123456 · · Score: 1

      What I wonder is if you make a conventional CPU out of SiC, you can operate it at a far higher clock because it won't melt itself, thus enabling high performance CPUs or perhaps 3D integration.

      --PeterM

      I'm not quite sure that I really want my laptop's CPU running at 2500C under load...

    9. Re:I don't think so by Shakrai · · Score: 1

      I'm more curious how they plan to power such a device

      Would a TEG work?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    10. Re:I don't think so by KiloByte · · Score: 1

      They'll use a token ring.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    11. Re:I don't think so by locallyunscene · · Score: 1

      Those were my questions as well. I wonder if they could leverage the energy in the molten rock somehow. It will be swimming in a sea of energy.

      And maybe I've heard too much technobabble over the years, but doesn't molten rock have its own magnetic fields?

    12. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And maybe I've heard too much technobabble over the years, but doesn't molten rock have its own magnetic fields?

      Fuckin' magma, how does it work?

    13. Re:I don't think so by idontgno · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Their in-depth chemical analysis of the lava in the volcanic caldera will reveal startling amounts of hydrocarbon and nitrogen gas. Someone will pin global warming on this, attempting to counter anthropogenic GW. Hilarity will ensue.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    14. Re:I don't think so by jandrese · · Score: 1

      Anything that's a heat engine (which account for most every way we know to generate power today) won't work because a heat engine requires both a hot side and a cold side. They'll have plenty of hot, but finding a cold side when you're immersed in magma is not going to be easy.

      TEGs require a cool side as well, so they won't work.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    15. Re:I don't think so by slick7 · · Score: 1

      Even if the package is heat-proof, the electronics are going to fry.

      What a chance to test layered aerogel.

      --
      The mind conceives, the body achieves, the spirit manifests.
    16. Re:I don't think so by genmax · · Score: 1

      Heat insulated condoms.

    17. Re:I don't think so by TheDarkMaster · · Score: 1

      Running Crysis with a literally red-hot CPU inside the case? I love this idea! :)

      --
      Religion: The greatest weapon of mass destruction of all time
    18. Re:I don't think so by cfalcon · · Score: 1

      If the package is heat-proof, then I suspect it's breaking some laws of physics.

    19. Re:I don't think so by seven+of+five · · Score: 1

      If you RTFA, they mentioned that they're going to be using a different-than-standard electronic technology based on silicon carbide rather than silicon. Silicon carbide does not decompose until 2730C

      Silicon carbide capacitors? Resistors? No copper or solder anywhere?

    20. Re:I don't think so by ObsessiveMathsFreak · · Score: 1

      You need to make them out of Steel--or Bauxite.

      --
      May the Maths Be with you!
    21. Re:I don't think so by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so no one thought to use Unobtainium? (The Core) Sheesh...

    22. Re:I don't think so by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      See thats what I'm wondering. All this talk of SiC is hardly making me wonder how they missed the obvious details like these. Unless they thought they were too boring to mention. In which case they arent pandering to their audience... science nerds love that stuff.

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
    23. Re:I don't think so by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

      High power electronic components are already made from/with SiC. Gallium nitride has taken over the LED market from SiC, but it's still used. The problem with defects they note in the SiC article are probably too great to manage across a typical CPU-sized wafer.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
  6. Friendly trollish reminder by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

    Bobby Jindal mocked volcano monitoring shortly before the eruption of Eyjafjallajökull and some other one in the US. No, can't find the name of the US one right now. But this was after Obama's first State of the Union Address.

    --
    Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    1. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Quite serious question:

      Apart from the initial explosion what is to be done? If we knew Eyjafjallongname was going to explode and disrupt air travel, could we have done anything? We don't have the technology to fend exploding mountains or the million metric tons of ash put up in the skies.

    2. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by khallow · · Score: 1

      I still get tear-eyed thinking of those evil, Republican governors mocking our delicate, sensitive volcanoes. You can't expect one to perform under those circumstances.

    3. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run away?

    4. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by MozeeToby · · Score: 1

      As much as I love poking fun at conservative politicians, the guy had a point. He was speaking out against volcano monitoring as part of an economic stimulus package, not as part of the general budget. He was using it as a valid example of how special interest groups (in this case, some researchers who happened to have contacts in a senator's office) had managed to earmark some of the stimulus for things that would do very little to increase consumer spending.

    5. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's a chance to prepare. Evacuate nearby islands, go buy groceries to prepare to stay inside for a while, get your livestock sheltered and food sealed from the ash, etc.

    6. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by h4rr4r · · Score: 1

      BMW for instance would have shipped more parts ahead of time, so their factories did not need to close. Lots of folks would have done things like that, or made alternate plans for shipping goods.

    7. Re:Friendly trollish reminder by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Then he should have said so: "Whatever merit these earmarks might have, but it is irresponsible to promote funding for them on grounds of stimulus."

      Instead, he trivialized the idea wholesale by saying:

      ... their legislation is larded with wasteful spending. It includes ... $140 million for something called volcano monitoring.

      Instead of monitoring volcanoes, what Congress should be monitoring is the eruption of spending in Washington, D.C.[bold added]

      WTF?

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
  7. But... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... do we really need a Lord of the Rings remake?

  8. Silicon Carbide? Not Calcium Magnesium Carbide? by eldavojohn · · Score: 1

    It's dolomite, baby! The mineral that won't cop out when the heat is all about.

    - Professor Farnsworth

    --
    My work here is dung.
  9. Topflight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So the sensor is going to look like a big golf ball? I guess that will be one tough course. "And Tiger Woods is puling a long drive down the middle of Krakatowa... ohhh, and he's in the lava! That will be tough shot out, what do you think John?" "He might need a #2 wedge for that one, Bob".

  10. Let's call it... by surmak · · Score: 4, Funny

    volcano information recorder going into netherworld

    1. Re:Let's call it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'd probably be at +5 by now if you'd written

      Volcano Information Recorder Going Into Netherworld

    2. Re:Let's call it... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Volcanic Information Relay & Gathering Intelligence Node" is my proposal

  11. Next stop: Venus? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Venus, with temperatures hot enough to melt lead, has proven a tough nut to crack for probes hoping to return information about its awesomely hellish surface. But if we're talking about a small probe that can transmit while bobbing around like a cork in a lake of liquid rock... well, mere "lead-melting" heat should be a walk in the park for that little critter.

    Send a craft with a few hundred of these guys in its hold, drop 'em on the surface, and find out what's going on with our evil-twin-sister planet. I especially want to know what's going on with the Venusian highlands, where there seems to be a radar-reflecting "frost" of heavy metals coating the ground. Even if all these probes can tell us is how blisteringly hot it is, that's got to tell us *something* about the environment. Venus sounds like a metal-ore refinery, and I'd love for someone to decide that it's worth a few (hundred) billion bucks to go get some of that Unobtanium (or whatever) and bring it back to Earth.

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Next stop: Venus? by __aagctu1952 · · Score: 1

      Science reporting at its best. I especially liked this quote:

      The only way to glimpse what lies beneath its opaque clouds is by radar, and several missions have carried our radar surveys from orbit, principally the Magellan probe which operated from 1990 to 1994.

      It's not like we have pictures from the surface of Venus or anything...

      That goes for your post as well. While Venus is a fascinating planet in many ways, and I too would like to see more probes sent to it, your post comes across as crackpottery:

      Even if all these probes can tell us is how blisteringly hot it is, that's got to tell us *something* about the environment. Venus sounds like a metal-ore refinery, and I'd love for someone to decide that it's worth a few (hundred) billion bucks to go get some of that Unobtanium (or whatever) and bring it back to Earth.

    2. Re:Next stop: Venus? by mbone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Venus is 425 C (or so), and these are rated up to 900 C, so they absolutely should work on Venus.

      Of course, this is not new. From a description of the Soviet Venera landers :

      "By the time of Venera-13 and 14, a surprising amount of complex equipment was simply installed outside the pressure hull, exposed to the intensely hostile surface conditions. By this time, Soviet engineers had developed new heat-resistant materials and electronics that were comfortable in this working environment."

    3. Re:Next stop: Venus? by element-o.p. · · Score: 1

      IIRC, I believe it was not just the extreme heat, but the pressure and extremely corrosive atmosphere that make Venus so incredibly inhospitable. In other words, just because the sensors can stand the heat of a volcano does not necessarily mean they can withstand the atmospheric pressure and corrosive atmosphere of Venus.

      --
      MCSE? No, sir...I don't do Windows. Yes, I am an idealist. What's your point?
    4. Re:Next stop: Venus? by Lucractius · · Score: 1

      Being a space exploration fan. I'm surprised I haven't seen that site before. Thanks for the link. [ Already knew about the photos though. But his new versions are nice. ]

      --
      XML - A clever joke would be here if /. didn't mangle tag brackets.
  12. SPECTRE's not gonna like this by CohibaVancouver · · Score: 1

    SPECTRE's not gonna like this... Where will they hide their rockets?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:SPECTRE.jpg

  13. i'm skeptical... by Mike+Kristopeit · · Score: 1
    how could anything dense enough to keep molten rock out be permeable enough to let wireless signals escape?

    i've seen amazing things, so i'm not going to say it's impossible... but landing on the moon is cake in comparison.

  14. How do they transmit through several feet of rock? by Sonny+Yatsen · · Score: 1

    I think the more interesting aspect of what they are proposing isn't so much that they're building a super-durable sensor rig that can withstand the heat of liquid magma, but rather how they propose to transmit through several feet of liquid hot rock. They must pack one hell of a powerful transmitter into the probe.

    --
    My postings are informational and does not constitute legal advice. Act on it at your risk.
  15. Dolemite by kimvette · · Score: 1

    Why not just send Bender? After all, he's 40% dolemite!

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  16. Go commercial, off-the-shelf by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    I'm convinced that D-link has been making wireless gear for this for years. I frequently find that this may be the only use for their wireless equipment.

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  17. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by TooMuchToDo · · Score: 1

    Or an extremely sensitive receiver near the volcano edge. Perhaps using extremely low frequency signals to get through the dense molten/solid rock? Slow as hell bitrate though =(

  18. volcano devices by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Adds a whole new meaning to hot spots.

    Ill bet its running linux and someone will have a hack for it within a week.

  19. +5 reps by JTsyo · · Score: 1

    If they can power it with the heat available in the volcano. How does the thermo work out for running a cooler powered by ambient temperature and dumping the created heat back.

  20. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by Unequivocal · · Score: 1

    Yeah - good point. I was wondering the same thing. It's one thing to dunk a sensor into molten rock and have it continue to function. It's another to get it to transmit through the heat/density/whatever above it. Hmm. On the plus side if they have anything that can convert heat to electricity they'll have power to spare (though they'll need to setup some kind of a heat differential somehow as best I understand thermodyanmics).

  21. Sandalphon by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be a treat if they discovered an Angel down there? Then we'd finally have a reason for emo teens to pilot mechs!

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
    1. Re:Sandalphon by Stachybotris · · Score: 1

      I was waiting for the Eva reference. Thanks!

  22. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by Abstrackt · · Score: 1

    Maybe they'd drop several at different points/heights and establish a mesh network. That way, as long as you could reach one sensor you could reach all or most of the sensors that are still operational.

    --
    They say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, but it's not one half so bad as a lot of ignorance. - Terry Pratchett
  23. Misleading summary by Pinckney · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to Horsfall and his fellow nails-tough tech developers, their carbide electronics can keep working up to temperatures of 900C. This is actually sufficient to withstand immersion in some lavas/magmas, though by no means all. In any case it's difficult to see how any wireless signal could be transmitted through molten minerals, so presumably the inventors are talking more about locating their kit in places within a caldera which - although extremely hot - are not enough so to actually melt rock.

    The caldera is not a synonym for lava puddles. They're talking about putting a sensor in the caldera where it can detect gasses. It's not likely to be floating, much less submerged, and in fact that would presumably interfere with the mission of detecting various gasses.

    (I've only read the article, not the papers)

  24. Fail... by Capt+James+McCarthy · · Score: 1

    I guess Sauron should have thought of this.

    --
    There are no loopholes. It's either legal or it's not.
  25. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And why not just scoop some molten rock out in a bucket and test it outside the volcano?

  26. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by nomel · · Score: 1

    Is molten rock all that conductive or much of a dielectric? If not, then it wouldn't be much different than passing a radio wave through several layers of concrete (walls). This will be much easier than trying to transmit out from water, a conductive and very dielectric material.

  27. Different Doping? by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

    Are you making your own semiconductors?
    I am curious if it is possible to use doping levels on the chips that would allow them to work at high temperatures while not necessarily working at room temperature.
    Perhaps you could get with NASA. I bet they would need something similar for exploring Venus.

    Britney Spears may be able to enlighten us on the subject. http://britneyspears.ac/lasers.htm

  28. cooking sensors by trb · · Score: 3, Interesting
    A hacker pal of mine worked at Tektronix in the late 70's, he told me this story. Tektronix made all kinds of oscilloscopes and electronic test gear. Apparently, they had a fancy special-purpose scope (cost maybe $10k/each), that they sold about 20 of each year. Suddenly, one company started ordering 4 or these scopes a month. This was surprising to Tektronix, and they had to change their inventory handling to deal with this change in demand. They decided to call the customer and figure out what they were using all these scopes for.

    Turns out the customer was one of the research labs (LANL or something, I forget which). They were measuring nuclear reactions, and using these scopes because they had a particular kind of sensor, but the tests were destructive, and every time they ran the experiment (once a week), they vaporized a scope. I think they figured out a way to sell the customer the sensor without wrapping it in all the fancy scopey packaging.

    1. Re:cooking sensors by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Or maybe sell them a few extra feet of wire for the probe...

      Although, really, it sounds a bit apocryphal, like maybe you're misremembering it. Because I can't think of a situation where you'd want to have a scope that would be destroyed by the test, since to use a scope you need something to observe the scope, it being a scope, see...which means maybe what they weren't telling you is that a technician was being vaporized along with the scope, see...

      (And at the point where we figure out what the real deal is here I'm going to have an "aha!" sort of recognition. I remember those late 70s Tektronix catalogs; I used to read them over and over like they were pr0n...)

    2. Re:cooking sensors by trb · · Score: 1

      Measurement may be constrained by conditions like timing and signal levels (before amplification). Both of these can be solved by using a properly designed sensor that might live in a fancy plastic box, and it wouldn't be the same with a few extra feet of wire. (Would you put a few extra feet of wire between a motherboard and an in-circuit emulator?)

    3. Re:cooking sensors by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Well, uh, your average ICE/DAS/Logic Analyzer has about 8 feet of wire between it and the mobo. 8 feet of excruciatingly calibrated wire that can cost thousands of dollars per ribbon cable.

      But the thing here seems to be that they're using a scope. The point of a scope is it has a specialized visual readout (inimitably so in the 70s before the advent of LCD scopes, PC-based metrology, and networked everything). And I can't see a reason to do that in an environment where the scope could be damaged, since anyone reading the scope would be damaged a lot quicker than the scope could be damaged.

      But maybe it was a specialized measurement plugin, not a scope per se. IIRC Tek did have a comm protocol (similar to GPIB or HPIB). So maybe the LANL guys had the save-the-technician bug worked out, and just didn't have a way to get that plugin and its probe in a less-destruction-necessary form.

      And, given the attitude of gummint during the Cold War, they probably didn't much care that they could save a few grand on each of those tests. One look at satellite pics of Yucca Flats shows that there was no shortage of money being destructed in those decades...

  29. Hmm by durrr · · Score: 1

    Lava-Cooled computer with wireless connection, who said we don't live in the future.

  30. They don't use Silicon Electronics by Myrv · · Score: 1

    FTA:

    According to Horsfall and his fellow nails-tough tech developers, their carbide electronics can keep working up to temperatures of 900C. This is actually sufficient to withstand immersion in some lavas/magmas, though by no means all.

    Apparently they aren't using Silicon based electronics so they don't need to keep the sensor that cool (at least from a silicon point of view). But even if the electronics can handle it I'm still not entirely sure what they would use to power it all (Sodium Nickel Chloride battery typically work between 270 and 350C, other molten salt batteries used in missile systems typically operate between 400-550C).

  31. Token ring by Script+Cat · · Score: 1

    One Sensor to connect them all, One Sensor to find them,
    One sensor to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

    Would it be able to use a Token ring protocol?

    1. Re:Token ring by trb · · Score: 1
      One Sensor to connect them all, One Sensor to find them,
      One sensor to bring them all and in the darkness bind them

      Would it be able to use a Tolkien ring protocol?

      FTFY

  32. Just make them with by gmuslera · · Score: 1

    Unobtanium

  33. where's the tag? by slshwtw · · Score: 1

    What could possibly go wrong?

  34. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by blair1q · · Score: 1

    Molten rock can have almost any chemical composition, just like solidified rock. So the answer is "yes".

  35. X-Prize candidate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems to me that this is a good X-Prize candidate...

  36. To late sensor by Shotgun · · Score: 1

    Great! Now we will have a "you're going to die in 30 seconds" sensor to go along with the "replace engine" indicator light in our cars!!

    --
    Aah, change is good. -- Rafiki
    Yeah, but it ain't easy. -- Simba
  37. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by jbeaupre · · Score: 1

    The short answer is magma is conductive. Look up melting a beer bottle in a microwave to learn why.

    --
    The world is made by those who show up for the job.
  38. Can you hear me now? by RealGrouchy · · Score: 1

    What, there aren't enough guys on cellphones asking "Can you hear me now?" to drop into volcanoes? You don't need a fancy probe to detect wireless signals.

    - RG>

    --
    Hey pal, this isn't a pleasantforest, so don't waste my time with pleasantries!
  39. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Smoke signals

  40. seaQuest did it by Wannabe+Code+Monkey · · Score: 1

    Just watch episode 15 of season 1 of seaQuest... I'm pretty sure all your questions will be answered.

    --
    We always knew Comcast was corrupt, here's the proof: http://tech.slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=1909890&cid=34545432
  41. "Simpsons already did it!" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah, we did this on SeaQuest in in 1993-4. Season 1, eps 103 & 116- The Devil's WIndow and Greed for a Pirate's Dream.

  42. Use sound! by DrJimbo · · Score: 1

    Transmitting signals wirelessly through ocean water presents many of the same difficulties. There is already a very well developed technology for doing this based on sound. The transmitters are usually trivial to build. The tough part is the receiver because in order to get high data rates, you have to go to great lengths to compensate for extreme multipath distortion (echoes).

    --
    We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
    -- Anais Nin
  43. Even if you could solve the power problem by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    and the "preventing your equipment from melting" problem, how do you solve the "transmitting signals through molten rock" problem?

  44. Umm, ok... by sean.peters · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Venus sounds like a metal-ore refinery, and I'd love for someone to decide that it's worth a few (hundred) billion bucks to go get some of that Unobtanium (or whatever) and bring it back to Earth.

    Yeah, it would be cool for someone to decide that. Trouble is, it's almost certainly not true. Someone did the math here on Slashdot once before (in the context of mining Mars) and came to the conclusion that even if there were bricks of solid platinum lying about on the surface of Mars, it wouldn't be economically feasible to recover them (given realistic estimates of the costs involved in going to get them and bring them back). Going to Venus would be even worse, both because of the extreme environmental conditions there and the fact that the metals are not, in all probability, lying about in the form of preprocessed bricks.

  45. Dude, come on by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    There is already a very well developed technology for doing this based on sound.

    Sure, there absolutely is... in water. Doing the same thing in magma: not so well developed. All the tech we have for doing sonar and underwater comms would melt at these temperatures, and it's not clear what substitute materials you could use that would survive. This would require a major amount of engineering research to figure out, and I doubt anyone could stomach the cost.

    And even if you could figure that out, the sonic environment within the magma lake has got to be terrible - weird thermal gradients, high background noise, the multipath effects you mention... it's a very hard problem.

    All in all I think this is a tremendously unlikely solution to the problem.

    1. Re:Dude, come on by DrJimbo · · Score: 1
      I will agree with you that creating transducers that can take the heat might require new engineering. ISTM almost everything inside their probe is going to require new engineering.

      And even if you could figure that out, the sonic environment within the magma lake has got to be terrible - weird thermal gradients, high background noise, the multipath effects you mention... it's a very hard problem.

      As I said before, even though this is a hard problem, it has already been solved. I've conducted experiments doing real-time high speed underwater acoustic communication in extremely hostile shallow-water sonic environments filled with high background noise (ships), thermal gradients, and multipath. Actually, the distortion caused by thermal gradients is included in the multipath.

      The way it works is that you can model all the multipath (including effects due to thermal gradients) in the channel as a FIR filter. This is how most modems work. But for most modems (like DSL modems) the channel changes very slowly over time. This is an easy problem to solve. The tricky part comes in when the acoustic channel you are trying to communicate over changes rapidly. In that case you need to update your model of the channel rapidly. This is done with a recursive prediction/correction algorithm similar to a Kalman Filter. As I said before, all the heavy processing is done on the receiver end so the only new technical challenge is the transducer on the transmitter. If they don't have the technical know-how to keep their receiving electronics from falling into the magma then I doubt they will be able to get any wireless scheme to work.

      --
      We don't see the world as it is, we see it as we are.
      -- Anais Nin
  46. Hold on.. by RobDollar · · Score: 1

    Has anyone made the wireless hotspot joke yet?

  47. You missed the point by l2718 · · Score: 1

    The whole point of the story is to make the electronics heat-proof. Apparently silicon-carbide electronics can function at much higher temperatures than ordinary silicon.

  48. It's DOLOMITE, baby!!!!! by IHC+Navistar · · Score: 1

    Did they consider the direction of the flow of molten rock? It will be like trying to drop a pea into a gushing fire hydrant.

    If they want something that will survive being covered by lava, they could try tantalum hafnium carbide.

    Or, alternatively, they could use dolomite.....

    --
    Knowing Google's lust for data collection, the Soviet Union is still alive and well inside the psyche of Sergey Brin....
  49. resillient by Joebert · · Score: 1

    What might a heat proof container let an instrument measure? I'm guessing temp is out of the question.

    --
    Wanna fight ? Bend over, stick your head up your ass, and fight for air.
  50. Re:How do they transmit through several feet of ro by Muad'Dave · · Score: 1

    Why allow it to be buried? Why not design it to float on the magma, antenna up, sensors down. It would be pretty easy to do, since magma is very dense.

    --
    Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.