My favorite part is the condescending mansplaining (no irony there, no!) of why gender neutral pronouns are more important than anything else on the planet.
Institutionally, their culture is pretty much dead set against spending any time on standards compliance, let alone interoperabililty. Yes, it is partially intentional, but in reality, it is just incentivized laziness.
They don't want (let alone need) any other vendor to interoperate, so they don't spend any time hiring people who care about that sort of thing; those type of people don't last long at MS.
Slashdot Mirror
My favorite part is the condescending mansplaining (no irony there, no!) of why gender neutral pronouns are more important than anything else on the planet.
Add "Replace Tabs" to that list.
Who is "they"?
You trust the government you distrust to have the sole access to means of violence, but not encryption? Not a good plan.
Since when has "secure hardware" meant anything except "make sure nobody can install anything but windows"?
How does any of that help you if you are running easily exploited bad code from MS?
Then you should be fine with eliminating DST time changes, if you are a fan of not "having a fuss".
Stop fussing.
Are you sure?
https://ourworldindata.org/sli...
I realize it is of limited use - but I'd love to know if IME packets can be easily identified.
If a firewall manufacturer didn't let you block arbitrary ports, would you be ok with it?
So why not provide a way to turn it off for those of us who don't want it?
Why not just filter all IME frames at the ethernet switch level?
Is it configurable by .config in the real linux kernel sources, or is it all unaccepted patches?
I tried to like Reynolds. I really did. But he just falls short IMO.
In any case, it isn't surprising that non SF dominated the Hugo Awards (yet again) - there really aren't any great SF authors out there doing real SF.
I have to say though, I don't think Jemesin's work is that notable either.
Nobody has written any decent real SF since Iain Banks died.
No Iain M. Banks? Shame on you.
sw=4:ts=8:no expandtab or GTFO
Feel free to write your own kernel. Linus did. Why can't you?
Other than you'd have to find a problem that a microkernel actually solves.
They're all basically the same
RT, Bugzilla, JIRA, Traq
Pick one.
You mean "Fuck you, we are big enough that net neutrality would hurt us now."
Ever heard of valgrind?
scan-build?
libasan?
What does this do that libasan and clang's scan-build don't?
Institutionally, their culture is pretty much dead set against spending any time on standards compliance, let alone interoperabililty. Yes, it is partially intentional, but in reality, it is just incentivized laziness.
They don't want (let alone need) any other vendor to interoperate, so they don't spend any time hiring people who care about that sort of thing; those type of people don't last long at MS.
Agree. Dovecot works great.
Exchange IMAP performance is atrocious, not to mention completely broken from a standards point of view.