Slashdot Mirror


User: Chris+Mattern

Chris+Mattern's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
7,102
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 7,102

  1. Re:3000 players you say? on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 2

    Slow? Yes. Boring? Not hardly. Watching the supercap you spent months acquiring getting torn apart piece by piece is, I would wager, anything but boring. Not pleasant. But not boring. And, looking on the other side, realizing that you've delivering a serious blow to Goonfleet, one of the most powerful--and hated--coalitions in Eve, had to have been much more pleasant. And also not boring.

  2. Re:$3600 ship on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 1

    The $3600 was,yes, the equivalent cost of just the one ship. *You* don't permanently die, but your ships and equipment and items can, and do. Also, while death is not permanent, you *can* be killed; when your ship is destroyed, you eject in a pod, which can easily be single-shotted by even small ships. This kills you. That results in the destruction of any implants you may have had installed (which in the case of high-level pilots can run into the billions of ISK) and means you must re-upgrade your medical clone (because you just used the one you had) at a price--generally not all that high, in fact, but it's still another cost.

  3. Re:$3600 ship on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 2

    So... just to clarify, did this guy actually spend $3500 on his ship?

    Almost certainly not. But he probably could've sold it for enough ISK to buy enough PLEX to enable him to play the game for the next dozen years for free.

  4. Re:The game is SLOOOOOOOWWWW! on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Please repeat after me:

    Slow does not mean turn-based.

    Turn-based does not mean slow (ever seen a game of blitz chess played?)

  5. Re:$3600 ship on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 4, Informative

    Why he simply didn't jump back to escape from this territory?

    Because the first thing any opponent does in this situation is have tacklers web and warp scramble you. And they'll start bumping you to push you away from directions they don't want you go. And you materialize from an incoming jump a few kilometers away from the gate/cyno field. You ain't goin' nowhere.

    If he couldn't jump back, why he simply didn't use his escape pod to escape, sacrificing only one titan, instead of three?

    *That* is an excellent question. It's probably what he should have done. But he didn't want to eat the loss, so he upped the stakes, hoping he could win.

  6. Re:$3600 ship on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 1

    From the accounts I read, his battlecry was more likely "OhGodWhatDidIJustDo? HEEEEELP!"

    Accidentally appearing in the middle of enemy controlled territory means he most likely was immediately pinned by several well-equipped tackles--helped by the fact that a Titan is one of the least agile ships in the game. They would have had plenty of time to get him properly wrapped up. By the time he realized he wasn't going where he thought he was going, it was too late.

  7. Re:Since when? on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 1

    I figure he ragequit when he lost his cruiser. Unlikely that he lasted long enough to work up to a BC.

  8. $3600 ship on How EVE Online Dealt With a 3,000-Player Battle · · Score: 5, Informative

    According to the Eve message boards, it was a Leviathan-class Titan. $3600 may be a bit on the high side, but it was worth thousands, definitely.

    Incidentlally, estimated losses for the entire battle (which included *three* titans lost before it was all over, all on the side the guy who misjumped) is over 700 billion ISK. That's about *$25,000*, kiddies.

  9. Re:Nothing new - it's like the self incinerating t on DARPA Seeks To Secure Data With Electronics That Dissolve On Command · · Score: 1

    Fun fact--in the original pilot and several episodes in the first season (including some after the tape had been introduced), the message was on a self-incinerating *vinyl record*.

  10. More likely he hasn't watched either, but he's heard of Star Wars.

  11. Re:*sigh* on Cisco Exits the Consumer Market, Sells Linksys To Belkin · · Score: 1

    Or your Roto-Rooter.

  12. Re:"Secret" as in "well signposted"? on Secret UK Uranium Components Plant Closed Over Safety Fears · · Score: 1

    Well, of course. It's just down the street from the secret nuclear bunker.

  13. Re:Blamestorming on CTO Says Al-Khabaz Expulsion Shows CS Departments Stuck In "Pre-Internet Era" · · Score: 1

    Of course it does. If life hands you lemons, or in this case, an ass-raping by the Secret Service, you might as well make marketing lemonade out of it. The fact remains that Steve Jackson Games was shut down for some time and very nearly went out of business, for doing absolutely nothing wrong, because a Secret Service manager saw a chance to rack up some political brownie points by smacking "evil hackers" who couldn't defend themselves.

  14. Re:CGN is not instead of IPv6, it is complementary on UK ISPs Respond To the Dangers of Using Carrier Grade NAT Instead of IPv6 · · Score: 1

    Q. Hello, I am Interested in Internet service, do you offer IPv6?

    A. No, there is no business case for us to do so.

    Q. Thanks for your time....click.

    Frankly, your ISP doesn't care that much about you, because you're not the vast majority of their user base. People who have even *heard* the terms "IPv4" and IPv6" are probably less than 1% of their customers.

  15. Re:CGN is not instead of IPv6, it is complementary on UK ISPs Respond To the Dangers of Using Carrier Grade NAT Instead of IPv6 · · Score: 1

    The problem with ipv6/ipv4 dual stacking when there is little to no ipv6 only out there is that it is pain now, payoff later...maybe. Unsurprisingly, it's had trouble getting people to line up for it.

  16. Re:This is surprising on Multi-State AT&T U-Verse Outage Enters Third Day · · Score: 1

    Fix It Again, Tony!

  17. Re:Stephen Heymann on Andrew Auernheimer Case Uncomfortably Similar To Aaron Swartz Case · · Score: 1

    You don't seriously think the White House pays any attention to those, do you? If it doesn't fit in with what they want to do, it just gets rubber-stamped "No" and tossed in the trash can.

  18. Re:OK, 35 years, then... on MIT Warned of a JSTOR Death Sentence Due To Swartz · · Score: 1

    Furthermore, the prosecutor can't just go out and charge whoever he likes, he needs to convince a grand jury that the charges are reasonable. That means a majority of about 20 regular people have to agree that the person should get charged.

    Over nine times out of ten,the grand jury will indict whomever the prosecutor tells them to, regardless of the circumstances. Google "ham sandwich prosectuor" and find out why the research paper referenced by the summary is titled "Ham Sandwich Nation".

  19. Re:Mac OS my a$$ on Meet "Ophelia," Dell's Plan To Reinvent Itself · · Score: 1

    MacOS won't be running from this device. It'll be running from a Mac, which this device will be a remote terminal to.

  20. So, when the ice cubes talk to you... on Smart Ice Cubes Tell When You've Had Enough Alcohol · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...you've had enough. I don't think this is exactly news.

  21. Re:The Number One Impediment is MEETINGS on Ask Slashdot: What Practices Impede Developers' Productivity? · · Score: 1

    Because meetings are the only way to let people know about something new, of course.

  22. Re:Famicon on The Geek Art Movement · · Score: 2

    Heroic NESbots battle the evil Famicons. More than meets the eye!

  23. Not Altair on The Geek Art Movement · · Score: 1

    Those would be Atari games, not Altair.

  24. Re:No persuasion required on Ask Slashdot: Should Employers Ban Smartphones? · · Score: 1

    Yep, that works good. It's not like the malware can't eavesdrop on your remote connection or even take it over. Oh wait...

  25. Re:How do they do it? on Oregon Lawmakers Propose Mileage Tax On Fuel Efficient Vehicles · · Score: 1

    Because the tax is not on the use of gas, it is on the sale of gas. The gas is sold in Oregon, therefore Oregon can tax the sale of it. If Oregon taxed the use of gas, they'd have to prove the gas was used in Oregon, but that's not what they're taxing.