Is java an open-source language, that Microsoft could easily donate man hours to contributing to, or is it a closed thing that they are in competition with? Because if it's the latter, the company that owns Java is gonna have a tough run ahead of them.
The reason I don't cycle is because I exert too much force on the crank case, or they are made improperly, and the assembly starts racking around. Everytime I buy a bike I destroy it in about a week. I might weigh to much though, but either way I am sick of wasting money on a hobby like that.
Huh. I've been complaining for years about cyclists and then I read "drivers aren't given enough experience when learning to drive to identify small targets; They learn that pedestrian-sized obstacles are on pavements." Besides that being a woahdude moment for me, you are absolutely right. This fact must escape so many people...
Is it even possible to make money mining them? Why on earth would people do it? It can't really be feasible unless they already had a crunch box or something.
This is bullshit. The metro UI comes from the Zune, and everyone knows it. They have known it for years. How the hell does this crap get posted as an article? I demand the fucking idiot who did it step forward and atone for his sins.
Extremely very few people have a solar charging system. For practically all people, the cost of their electric bill would increase more than they were spending on gasoline. Also a car can be had for about 16k, whereas the hybrids cannot. For almost all people, it just costs more.
"That number sounds both awfully low and awfully specific."-Hypnosec
Well the team that wrote the control narrative probably kept it as concise as possible. If a pilot needs an answer, better to only have to pour through 3 or 4 operational tomes than 7 or 8. The specificness comes from engineers knowing how much the tomes weigh, subtracting the weight of an ipad from that, and saying that number is the amount of weight saved. Questions about what happens during device malfunction are relevant, but realistically the ipad would be easier to troubleshoot than a laptop with a full blown operating system and all sorts of parts in it. Also it is always possible that a pilot could spill coffee on the operating tomes, or maybe they could get lost or catch fire. The ipad changes none of these things, but it does save weight. To that end, it is a good decision IMHO.
I thought the spectrum for 4G hasn't been defined yet, meaning that technically it doesn't exist? This is the argument offered up for criticizing advertising previously; when we see 4G advertised everywhere here in the US, because it doesn't exist yet.
Sine the US grain belt exports 70% of the grain used to feed India and China, I suppose this puts us in a power position. Just what we need to fix our economy, get some demand-inflated prices for our largest and most important export. Everyone else can sit around blaming each other for overpopulating their country while we sit here self-sufficient at.312 billion. Glorious.
Neither. That in one hundred years time, they will be able to make a interstellar starship. The goals and capabilities of the ship have not been decided yet. If you want to know more, try to go to the convention. It should be rather hard to get in to, especially if you don't own a shipyard capable of manufacturing things on the class and scale of nimitz aircraft carriers and the like.
"The foundation of civilised society is voluntary action and compassion. Capitalism and charity are two sides of that coin. One cannot succeed without the other." - agm
That is my understanding. 'Capitalism' is not some model that we deliberately switched to one day. As if there was some press conference and a politician announced "Yeah, so this fiscal year we are changing our economic model from the bartering system to this new thing we are calling 'Capitalism'. We made some pamphlets here, if you want. It's all very simple, and effective immediately.' The so-called capitalist system is merely where we have ended up after all this time. No one designed it or controls it. Many attempt to regulate it, and there is much discussion to be had there. Surely, too, attempts to play opportunities in regulating such an important pinion in our society are evil, indeed. But the reality is that currency and goods move around, and some folks choose to play an opportunity there. Unlike the regulation, playing the system itself is not evil. Also a minority of those folks are hugely successful at this endeavor and are lauded for it. I think this is poor reasoning. By system I mean our financial system, economic system and freight system in tandem.
What a person does, their actions, is what makes their manner in a viewer's moral standard. If a citizen uses the system, the money never actually leaves the system. All things flow through it, and this is hardly evil. If a rich person brings suffering upon others then that is evil. Wine hurts no one, also marble or bentleys. If a rich citizen bought a troop of mercenaries and gunned down a village that would be evil. But using the system that improves by being used, is not evil. Shaming those with wealth shows ignorance of reality, and the cowardice of a character lacking personal responsibility. The wealthy don't take to the streets, greedily taking the fruits of workers with their bare hands. They don't strike them down with brutality to meet the cold gutter. There is no evil where no action has been taken. When the rich take to the streets, armed with feudal purpose, then there is evil.
The things that a person owns or how many notes she has that represent the ability to buy future goods and services are abstract things. A rich person makes money by putting his money in the market and playing opportunities in the system for growth. Money that is in the system is moving, in loans to less wealthy citizens, loans to small businesses, in market growth portfolios et cetera. It does not occur to some people that the investments which make their 401k or other growth strategy possible is the actions of large pools of wealth in the system. I don't intend to mean that all growth precipitates from large pools of currency, I intend that this is a finite pattern. I am using it as an example of how the system all works together. All the money in the system is liquid at such scale. It is not being held up in a vault as rocks in a tree's roots. The system is to be used to grow; how the tree uses the air and light which caresses its tenderest of branches that quiver in the sun, the earth its roots clutch, to grow.
There is also the weird topic of what 'makes' poor people poor. Maybe they have a personal philosophy or ideology that is not good at getting them opportunities and options; narrow worldview. Maybe they are not intelligent enough to navigate the rigors of wealth creation. Maybe they are not dedicated enough. Maybe they are not educated enough. Maybe they just don't want to. Who can say such things? All I know is, that the system is available in it's current state to all citizens. If some people choose not to take advantage of that for any purpose (not just wealth, it is only the most vibrant example I can use to paint these truths with), that is their business.
In the US we have all the power, all the food, all the electricity, all the resources, all the books, all the teachers, all the mentors, all the universities, a
You seem knowledgeable about this. Any hope to get Coca-Cola stains (or stains in general) out of plastic of all things? It's the only thing I can't seem to clean/fix, aside from cigarette holes in microfiber *shudder*. Next car, no smoking from the start.
I still use Boost. I have a HTC Evo Design, and it works everywhere. I pay $40 a month for full unlimited, including data, because of their shrinkage program (price drops $5 every 6 on-time prepayments, an incentive to keep your phone turned on sorta like a contract.), the price started at $55 a month. I buy prepaid cards at Walmart sometimes, other times I go online. I could call in too, or use auto-payment. I like it a lot, especially over my shitty Verizon contract I had before that.
Grafting and all that, as well as most genetic agriculture, comes from a monk who spent time splicing together different bean plants and breeding them. I can't remember his name, it's been a long time since I had a biology class. His work led to that square gene-expression thing we used to figure out with genes would be dominant. I'm surprised I remember any of that at all...
Either way, "As one tree contains many different genomes, natural selection and evolution could happen within a single organism." is a pretty bold claim.
Yeah I didn't think of that. Some of the photos must be pretty huge, they need some serious bandwidth in order to transmit them. Do you know if this is the same protocol for transmitting the Hubble images?
This isn't about temperature. Global warming never was about temperature, that is a red herring. Global warming causes adverse severe weather patterns, which is exactly what we are experiencing. Adding energy to the system changes weather all over the place, moves jet streams, introduces blocking patterns, creates droughts, heat waves, hurricanes, ice storms. These are all things that are happening in areas that do not usually experience these conditions and energy, recently and frequently. Global warming is not about temperature.
Slashdot Mirror
Is java an open-source language, that Microsoft could easily donate man hours to contributing to, or is it a closed thing that they are in competition with? Because if it's the latter, the company that owns Java is gonna have a tough run ahead of them.
The reason I don't cycle is because I exert too much force on the crank case, or they are made improperly, and the assembly starts racking around. Everytime I buy a bike I destroy it in about a week. I might weigh to much though, but either way I am sick of wasting money on a hobby like that.
Huh. I've been complaining for years about cyclists and then I read "drivers aren't given enough experience when learning to drive to identify small targets; They learn that pedestrian-sized obstacles are on pavements." Besides that being a woahdude moment for me, you are absolutely right. This fact must escape so many people...
Thank you for explaining, I actually really do appreciate it.
Is it even possible to make money mining them? Why on earth would people do it? It can't really be feasible unless they already had a crunch box or something.
Does this mean we can get in trouble for showing support? What the hell is going on?
This is bullshit. The metro UI comes from the Zune, and everyone knows it. They have known it for years. How the hell does this crap get posted as an article? I demand the fucking idiot who did it step forward and atone for his sins.
Extremely very few people have a solar charging system. For practically all people, the cost of their electric bill would increase more than they were spending on gasoline. Also a car can be had for about 16k, whereas the hybrids cannot. For almost all people, it just costs more.
So, what does this do to the environments around the melt? Is this an area that has wildlife in the summertime?
Like karma on reddit!
Years of hard work down the drain. What a shame.
"despite murder rates two orders of magnitude higher than civilised countries" How about you cite a source for your claim, citizen.
Wind energy is viable if you store the energy in a solar steam drum.
"That number sounds both awfully low and awfully specific."-Hypnosec
Well the team that wrote the control narrative probably kept it as concise as possible. If a pilot needs an answer, better to only have to pour through 3 or 4 operational tomes than 7 or 8. The specificness comes from engineers knowing how much the tomes weigh, subtracting the weight of an ipad from that, and saying that number is the amount of weight saved. Questions about what happens during device malfunction are relevant, but realistically the ipad would be easier to troubleshoot than a laptop with a full blown operating system and all sorts of parts in it. Also it is always possible that a pilot could spill coffee on the operating tomes, or maybe they could get lost or catch fire. The ipad changes none of these things, but it does save weight. To that end, it is a good decision IMHO.
I thought the spectrum for 4G hasn't been defined yet, meaning that technically it doesn't exist? This is the argument offered up for criticizing advertising previously; when we see 4G advertised everywhere here in the US, because it doesn't exist yet.
Sine the US grain belt exports 70% of the grain used to feed India and China, I suppose this puts us in a power position. Just what we need to fix our economy, get some demand-inflated prices for our largest and most important export. Everyone else can sit around blaming each other for overpopulating their country while we sit here self-sufficient at .312 billion. Glorious.
Neither. That in one hundred years time, they will be able to make a interstellar starship. The goals and capabilities of the ship have not been decided yet. If you want to know more, try to go to the convention. It should be rather hard to get in to, especially if you don't own a shipyard capable of manufacturing things on the class and scale of nimitz aircraft carriers and the like.
"The foundation of civilised society is voluntary action and compassion. Capitalism and charity are two sides of that coin. One cannot succeed without the other." - agm
That is my understanding. 'Capitalism' is not some model that we deliberately switched to one day. As if there was some press conference and a politician announced "Yeah, so this fiscal year we are changing our economic model from the bartering system to this new thing we are calling 'Capitalism'. We made some pamphlets here, if you want. It's all very simple, and effective immediately.' The so-called capitalist system is merely where we have ended up after all this time. No one designed it or controls it. Many attempt to regulate it, and there is much discussion to be had there. Surely, too, attempts to play opportunities in regulating such an important pinion in our society are evil, indeed. But the reality is that currency and goods move around, and some folks choose to play an opportunity there. Unlike the regulation, playing the system itself is not evil. Also a minority of those folks are hugely successful at this endeavor and are lauded for it. I think this is poor reasoning. By system I mean our financial system, economic system and freight system in tandem.
What a person does, their actions, is what makes their manner in a viewer's moral standard. If a citizen uses the system, the money never actually leaves the system. All things flow through it, and this is hardly evil. If a rich person brings suffering upon others then that is evil. Wine hurts no one, also marble or bentleys. If a rich citizen bought a troop of mercenaries and gunned down a village that would be evil. But using the system that improves by being used, is not evil. Shaming those with wealth shows ignorance of reality, and the cowardice of a character lacking personal responsibility. The wealthy don't take to the streets, greedily taking the fruits of workers with their bare hands. They don't strike them down with brutality to meet the cold gutter. There is no evil where no action has been taken. When the rich take to the streets, armed with feudal purpose, then there is evil.
The things that a person owns or how many notes she has that represent the ability to buy future goods and services are abstract things. A rich person makes money by putting his money in the market and playing opportunities in the system for growth. Money that is in the system is moving, in loans to less wealthy citizens, loans to small businesses, in market growth portfolios et cetera. It does not occur to some people that the investments which make their 401k or other growth strategy possible is the actions of large pools of wealth in the system. I don't intend to mean that all growth precipitates from large pools of currency, I intend that this is a finite pattern. I am using it as an example of how the system all works together. All the money in the system is liquid at such scale. It is not being held up in a vault as rocks in a tree's roots. The system is to be used to grow; how the tree uses the air and light which caresses its tenderest of branches that quiver in the sun, the earth its roots clutch, to grow.
There is also the weird topic of what 'makes' poor people poor. Maybe they have a personal philosophy or ideology that is not good at getting them opportunities and options; narrow worldview. Maybe they are not intelligent enough to navigate the rigors of wealth creation. Maybe they are not dedicated enough. Maybe they are not educated enough. Maybe they just don't want to. Who can say such things? All I know is, that the system is available in it's current state to all citizens. If some people choose not to take advantage of that for any purpose (not just wealth, it is only the most vibrant example I can use to paint these truths with), that is their business.
In the US we have all the power, all the food, all the electricity, all the resources, all the books, all the teachers, all the mentors, all the universities, a
You seem knowledgeable about this. Any hope to get Coca-Cola stains (or stains in general) out of plastic of all things? It's the only thing I can't seem to clean/fix, aside from cigarette holes in microfiber *shudder*. Next car, no smoking from the start.
I still use Boost. I have a HTC Evo Design, and it works everywhere. I pay $40 a month for full unlimited, including data, because of their shrinkage program (price drops $5 every 6 on-time prepayments, an incentive to keep your phone turned on sorta like a contract.), the price started at $55 a month. I buy prepaid cards at Walmart sometimes, other times I go online. I could call in too, or use auto-payment. I like it a lot, especially over my shitty Verizon contract I had before that.
Oh. So that is what the stuff actually looks like then? THAT IS FRIGGIN AWESOME. Thanks for the info.
Grafting and all that, as well as most genetic agriculture, comes from a monk who spent time splicing together different bean plants and breeding them. I can't remember his name, it's been a long time since I had a biology class. His work led to that square gene-expression thing we used to figure out with genes would be dominant. I'm surprised I remember any of that at all...
Either way, "As one tree contains many different genomes, natural selection and evolution could happen within a single organism." is a pretty bold claim.
Yeah I didn't think of that. Some of the photos must be pretty huge, they need some serious bandwidth in order to transmit them. Do you know if this is the same protocol for transmitting the Hubble images?
Thanks for sharing. If that happened in the US there would be a huge investigation into the human remains, right?
This isn't about temperature. Global warming never was about temperature, that is a red herring. Global warming causes adverse severe weather patterns, which is exactly what we are experiencing. Adding energy to the system changes weather all over the place, moves jet streams, introduces blocking patterns, creates droughts, heat waves, hurricanes, ice storms. These are all things that are happening in areas that do not usually experience these conditions and energy, recently and frequently. Global warming is not about temperature.