There's the infamous ld-linux.so workaround for -noexec mounts... but does ld-linux.so really need to me +x if it is only called (legitimately) by other executables? I don't really have any place I can test this theory at the moment...
Re:Seems to be a matter of reading 'man fstab' ...
on
A Closed Off System?
·
· Score: 1
Well, the good news is that ld-linux.so doesn't have suid / guid permissions on it, so "ld-linux.so escalate_to_root" won't work.
How is that not evil?! I think it's lacking in morality enough the word applies based on the harm of his actions being caused by a lack of any sense of propriety.
Yes, it is right. Every overpass is a bridge, and not all bridges are Golden Gate style. You might not even notice when you're on a bridge -- they are often in the length of 10s of feet and cross streams.
3 digit interstates are loops, bypasses, or spurs. The 3 digit number is unique BY STATE. Try traveling down I-95. I-295 shows up everwhere.
Example of a spur: I-195 in Maine, which is a few miles hop to Old Orchard Beach.
The whole state is losing on this ODF issue. Anytime you lock yourself into a vendor when you don't have to be locked in, it's a financial exposure. It's also entirely illegitimate to have to possess the software of one particular vendor in order to read public documents.
Besides, in the end, if they go with an open document specification, they may end up saving the equivalent in money that way. It's also $30 milllion in software that was donated, not cash. It's bribery, and in public infrastructure when the company making the "donation" is the topic of hot discussion, it's clearly corruption.
The entire process of getting ODF in Massachusetts stinks. Those arguing against it are using invalid arguments, and now it's being pushed in a bill that's unrelated (I don't care how much of a good cause something is... all these rider bills are a plague upon the public as well). Not to mention the amount of pressure a company from a different state is capbable of putting on a state government.
P.S., I'm running the State House in my own state becuase I am that fed up with seeing this kind of thing.
You should try it... it's a heck of a learning experience, even if you don't win. Still hoping to win, though.
NTPD does have a "kiss of death" packet available that sends horribly wrong time to misbehaving clients. It also has rate limiting built in.
Of course, there are some clients that are coded so stupidly there's nothing that affects them. My personal response is to go in and add "icmp-admin-prohibited" rejection rules to my firewall every now and then, but that's more laziness resulting in more work over the long term than anything else.
It would be really nice to think that it's not that hard. Yet, somehow, as a member of the NTP pool, I just keep on having issues. At this moment, I'm supporting roughly 1500 clients. 35% of my resources to supply all those clients with acurate time are being used by 40 clients. In fact, the top 10 "abusers" are taking nearly 17%... and it's a good moment.
I've read so many things about our government as a whole's actions this year, and I'm really distraught. I walked into my Senator's office today, and discussed meeting with her. Usually, she only takes groups. I assume the same applies for most other Senators and Reps. Letters get ignored, e-mails are only seen by staff... who knows what happens to faxes?
My answer? A call to the/. community to organize in each Congressional district. Anybody who wants to assist in putting together these groups, please e-mail me. techroots@storyinmemo.com. If 15 of us in Southern Maine get together, we'll get a meeting. If we, as an organization, speak, we'll be much louder. Anybody, and particularly anybody in Southern Maine, I really want to hear from you. In a world that organizes online, if we can speak in real life too, we as geeks may be the most efficient people to form together.
Let's see if we can't stand a chance in hell of not being oppressed by the government we as a country vote for.
It's actually BGP trickery... they use the same IP block in many different physical locations. It looks like the host is multihomed, but it's many hosts really spread everywhere and using the same IP. From that point, they just keep the same goodies on each server in their network.
But the difference is that it is not a requirement of YOUR country... it's a requirement of somebody else's. Certainly I expect the requirements posed on people who are not citizens of a country to be different than those posed upon people who are citizens of the country in question.
Not neccesarily international. I work as an IT auditor... companies outsource to us, and in many cases, there is a real, and clear, net benefit to them. Of course, we tend to do more management type consulting than anything else...
Slashdot Mirror
There's the infamous ld-linux.so workaround for -noexec mounts... but does ld-linux.so really need to me +x if it is only called (legitimately) by other executables? I don't really have any place I can test this theory at the moment...
Well, the good news is that ld-linux.so doesn't have suid / guid permissions on it, so "ld-linux.so escalate_to_root" won't work.
How is that not evil?! I think it's lacking in morality enough the word applies based on the harm of his actions being caused by a lack of any sense of propriety.
Yes, it is right. Every overpass is a bridge, and not all bridges are Golden Gate style. You might not even notice when you're on a bridge -- they are often in the length of 10s of feet and cross streams.
3 digit interstates are loops, bypasses, or spurs. The 3 digit number is unique BY STATE. Try traveling down I-95. I-295 shows up everwhere. Example of a spur: I-195 in Maine, which is a few miles hop to Old Orchard Beach.
See subject. Just a little side note there.
Besides, in the end, if they go with an open document specification, they may end up saving the equivalent in money that way. It's also $30 milllion in software that was donated, not cash. It's bribery, and in public infrastructure when the company making the "donation" is the topic of hot discussion, it's clearly corruption.
The entire process of getting ODF in Massachusetts stinks. Those arguing against it are using invalid arguments, and now it's being pushed in a bill that's unrelated (I don't care how much of a good cause something is... all these rider bills are a plague upon the public as well). Not to mention the amount of pressure a company from a different state is capbable of putting on a state government.
P.S., I'm running the State House in my own state becuase I am that fed up with seeing this kind of thing.
You should try it... it's a heck of a learning experience, even if you don't win. Still hoping to win, though.
NTPD does have a "kiss of death" packet available that sends horribly wrong time to misbehaving clients. It also has rate limiting built in. Of course, there are some clients that are coded so stupidly there's nothing that affects them. My personal response is to go in and add "icmp-admin-prohibited" rejection rules to my firewall every now and then, but that's more laziness resulting in more work over the long term than anything else.
It would be really nice to think that it's not that hard. Yet, somehow, as a member of the NTP pool, I just keep on having issues. At this moment, I'm supporting roughly 1500 clients. 35% of my resources to supply all those clients with acurate time are being used by 40 clients. In fact, the top 10 "abusers" are taking nearly 17%... and it's a good moment.
Well, yes... but this doesn't destroy the motor in the process...
My answer? A call to the /. community to organize in each Congressional district. Anybody who wants to assist in putting together these groups, please e-mail me. techroots@storyinmemo.com. If 15 of us in Southern Maine get together, we'll get a meeting. If we, as an organization, speak, we'll be much louder. Anybody, and particularly anybody in Southern Maine, I really want to hear from you. In a world that organizes online, if we can speak in real life too, we as geeks may be the most efficient people to form together.
Let's see if we can't stand a chance in hell of not being oppressed by the government we as a country vote for.
Chroot with a systrace. Looks clean to me. Wish I knew why the damn thing got a SIGPIPE and died, though.
It's actually BGP trickery... they use the same IP block in many different physical locations. It looks like the host is multihomed, but it's many hosts really spread everywhere and using the same IP. From that point, they just keep the same goodies on each server in their network.
But the difference is that it is not a requirement of YOUR country... it's a requirement of somebody else's. Certainly I expect the requirements posed on people who are not citizens of a country to be different than those posed upon people who are citizens of the country in question.
No... passports are compulsory ID to ENTER a country.
Having lived in the Linux From Scratch days, you'll find just about everything has use flags and parts that can be disabled.
Not neccesarily international. I work as an IT auditor... companies outsource to us, and in many cases, there is a real, and clear, net benefit to them. Of course, we tend to do more management type consulting than anything else...
perl -e 'while(<>){print map(pack("B*",$_),split(/ /))}'
There was a similar comment in mIRC a few years ago, I haven't used mIRC for years and don't know if it's still there. Wow man. Wow.
Oh, that's nothing to worry about... it's just their hot version of QuickBooks ;)
Point: that would make files of an infinite length of zeros.
/dev/null? ;)
Perhaps linked to
Bought on credit card? Call the card company.
This could be applied to a diesel engine just as well.
I'm rather suprised Faithless is signed to Sony, but *shrug.*
PS -- God is a DJ :)
Let's say his case is true... then it's an issue of pure fraud. They are collecting money from him, and lying about what he's paying for.