Slashdot Mirror


DVD Writer RoundUp

CodeHog writes "Got socks instead of the new DVD writer you were looking for this holiday season? Tom's Hardware has a writeup on the latest DVD writers and their 'true speeds'. The conclusions may be surprising: higher speeds won't necessarily do any good as media availability continues to be a problem." From the article: "Despite the stagnation of write speeds for DVD-R and DVD+R at 16x, new DVD writers are regularly being marketed, since performance for other types of writing (RW and dual-layer) is still improving. But as is customary, manufacturers of writers have a lead on media manufacturers. For this article, we visited all the stores to see what types of media are actually available for sale, and once again the result was most enlightening. You can find 16x-compatible -R and +R discs, but in the other formats they simply aren't out there."

146 comments

  1. Where are the good SATA burners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Yes, you can find some, but they're not avaiable in the same specs the high end PATA versions. Are they that difficult to make? Because it seems like this would be a good way to at least get the enthusiasts buying new drives. I'd like to make my next computer purely SATA based.

    1. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Crilen007 · · Score: 0

      I bought a SATA plextor and it caused the system not to boot. Plextor said to take it back because it didn't work with that motherboard. (The computer was 2 weeks old)

    2. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      Is SATA really worth it? I know it's a pain to route ATA cables, but I simply don't see SATA drives as worth the premium.

      I'm curious what Apple used, the latest Powermacs are all SATA, previous iterations had PATA optical drives with SATA hard drives.

    3. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Electronik · · Score: 1

      Just got the Plextor SATA DVD/CD RW 716SA... very happy with it, 100% compatable with my Intel motherboard and NO MORE PARALELL CABLES! This was an upgrade to my Yamaha SCSI 8x CD writer from 2001... hopefully the Plextor will last me at least 4 years as it's replacement.

      --
      -=test-sig_0.1.5(NoWhitespaceVersion)=-
    4. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by athakur999 · · Score: 1

      Last time I looked, Intel had the only motherboard chipsets that could support SATA optical drives. They wouldn't work on nVidia and VIA chipsets. That was a while back when Plextor first started sampling their SATA DVD writer and things may be different now, of course.

      --
      "People that quote themselves in their signatures bother me" - athakur999
    5. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by klui · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I feel SATA drives are good because you don't have to worry about a master/slave drive setup where one drive may hog the bus, whether it's another optical or hard disk. I don't think many companies make them and I'd rather get something like the NEC 4550/3550 or Pioneer 110(D). You can always get an adaptor but that would drive up the cost, sometimes 100+% of what the drive costs.

    6. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

      firewire/usb2.0 is your friend

      --
      There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    7. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well I honestly do not see benefit of SATA just yet, besides it has neater cables and no master/slave annoyance.

      It'll be more useful in future with flash-RAM cached HDD's, which will be able to send out data from time to time at speeds that make sense to be SATA.

      If ain't broken, don't fix it. Many motherboards have SATA, but buggy implementation. Also SATA isn't much faster than PATA right now. It's still on the PCI bus for most motherboards, while to make full use of its speed it has to be on a separate bus for its own usage (which will happen with future implementations).

      This reminds me of a buddy who was absolutely sure that ATA 133 disks are faster than ATA 100. Thing is neither of them fills that bandwidth in actual usage, so it trully and entirely doesn't matter.

    8. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Crilen007 · · Score: 2, Informative

      http://plextor.com/english/support/PX-716SA%20moth erboard%20compatability%20listing.htm Others support it. (seems like plextor doesnt support firefox though)

    9. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Better question:

      Where are the 8.4 GB "DVD9" disks? I can't find anything but DVD5 disks in the +/-R forms. You can only get DVD9 as a +RW, which won't work in anything but a computer. I smell an MPAA conspiracy...

    10. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by AEC216 · · Score: 1

      This is very true. I have a SATA Plextor 716SA. Yeah, it all hooked up and to the SATA ports but the BIOS still reports that the SATA chipset sits on the PCI bus. Fast little burner though, 8mb of cache is nice too.

      --
      May I please have my frontal lobotomy if I bring back the ashtrays?
    11. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by n8_f · · Score: 1

      Are you sure? I haven't seen a RW DL disk, but I see a bunch that call themselves Dual-Layer DVD+RW. Then in the small print, they mention they are write-once. Apparently, that is the name of the standard, the umbrella name for all of the discs. Sounds wrong, but if some marketing "people" had a say in the name.... I'll double-check when I get home, but I remember being really confused about that.

    12. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I honestly do not see benefit of SATA just yet, besides it has neater cables and no master/slave annoyance.

      You don't see any benefits, except for some of the benefits it offers? Huh?

      If ain't broken, don't fix it.

      Ah, right. You're one of those people who, whenever an improved product appears, says "but my existing product still works, therefore nobody should need the new and improved one".

      This reminds me of a buddy who was absolutely sure that ATA 133 disks are faster than ATA 100. Thing is neither of them fills that bandwidth in actual usage, so it trully and entirely doesn't matter.

      This has nothing to do with that. As you pointed out at the start of your post, SATA has thinner cables (= easier to install, better airflow, less space wasted for connectors, ...), and no dumb "master/slave annoyance".

      You admit that SATA is better at some things (cabling, installation, ...), and then strike it down as unnecessary because of a completely different feature (bandwidth). Students of logic will know this as a straw-man fallacy (the straw man here is "SATA's only advantage is bandwidth").

    13. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SATA optical works 100% fine on nVidia and VIA chipsets for at least a year now.

    14. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Cardoe · · Score: 1

      Look kids! This is why we don't write stuff in Microsoft Excel and then publish it on a website... Cause it looks like that. *points at the Plextor link in parent*

    15. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Stan+Vassilev · · Score: 1

      "You don't see any benefits, except for some of the benefits it offers? Huh?"

      Yes, I confirm this is what "except" means. No benefit, exception few minor ones which are not worth it.

      "Ah, right. You're one of those people who, whenever an improved product appears, says "but my existing product still works, therefore nobody should need the new and improved one"."

      Yes, I'm one of those people who don't throw their working equipment to buy the new fad because it helps sustain the Mighty Capitalism.

      And you appear to be one of those people that will break my comment in pieces and find silly arguments against each sentence just for the fun of it :)

      I don't swap my hard disks every day, so once it's installed I trully can't care less how my cable looks. SATA drives are harder to find (if you RTFA you'll see that), buggier, and offer no benefit during usage.

      It's like buying 1600x1200 TFT and using it with a video card capable of 800x600 max.

    16. Re:Where are the good SATA burners? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well I honestly do not see benefit of SATA just yet, besides it has neater cables and no master/slave annoyance.

      Don't forget the addition of a 1 meter cable length, compared to the 18" (0.45m?) cable length of PATA. That comes in handy when you're trying to put drives into larger cases where the shorter PATA cables just won't reach. (Unless you go out-of-spec with a 24" IDE cable.)

      SATA's not bad. I run a mix of PATA/SATA drives. Once you try putting (8) PATA drives into a single case, you'll start enumerating the benefits of SATA.

  2. It's the print version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So clearly this wasn't submitted by someone associated with the site, unlike the XYZ computing articles.

    1. Re:It's the print version by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, nothing says good internet neighbor like bypassing a site's advertising when linking on a high traffic site....

    2. Re:It's the print version by Splintax · · Score: 1

      I still see an ad at the top of the page. :-\

    3. Re:It's the print version by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 1

      Alright, bypassing most of a site's advertising... :-P

    4. Re:It's the print version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Interesting. I didn't realize they had print versions on Tom's Hardware, probably because if the regular articles link to them, they're hidden so well that I still can't find them. At any rate, now that I know all I have to do is stick print.html on the end of the URL, maybe I can start reading Tom's articles again without having to devote the better part of a day to going clicky on "next page" links.

    5. Re:It's the print version by seanvaandering · · Score: 1

      How about bypassing NONE now? They've redirected the print page to the index page, so you get to see it all in its spammy glory.

  3. Some Advice by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Never trust a DVD writer review that doesn't take into account burn quality and media compatibility. That's how DVD drives differentiate themselves today.

    1. Re:Some Advice by spacefight · · Score: 0, Troll

      Some Advice: Have a quick look at the article before posting; media compatibility is provided as there's a listing of each burning speed for the various different media types.

    2. Re:Some Advice by ppz003 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's what I can't understand about these types of reviews. So what if one drive can write faster than any other if I lose the data a couple years before the other drives' outputs. Maybe people who back up data constantly for a living might be concerned with the speed, but for my money, I'll burn as slow as needed to achieve a consistantly readable disk.

      This review would be much more interesting if they showed some quality data with each burner.

    3. Re:Some Advice by 1000StonedMonkeys · · Score: 2, Interesting

      By media compatibility, I mean how well the drive does on different brands of media. This varies greatly between drives, and is one of the most important pieces of information you can have to get the most out of your drive.

    4. Re:Some Advice by ppz003 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The burning speeds listed are just the maximum possible speeds for each type of media. What the gp was trying to say is how does each burner work with the different chemical types of each media. Not all DVD-R's are alike.

    5. Re:Some Advice by undeadly · · Score: 0, Redundant
      Never trust a DVD writer review that doesn't take into account burn quality and media compatibility. That's how DVD drives differentiate themselves today.

      Indeed, and that goes for media as well. For better reviews that test write and read quality as well, I find Optical Storage reviews useful. I've no interest in the fastest way to produce coasters when I'm making backups, so I do look at those reviews for both media and burners before I buy.

    6. Re:Some Advice by undeadly · · Score: 5, Informative
      This review would be much more interesting if they showed some quality data with each burner.

      Optical storage reviews at www.cdrinfo.com does this.

    7. Re:Some Advice by ppz003 · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the link. I'll definately check this out before I purchase more media.

    8. Re:Some Advice by Monkelectric · · Score: 1, Interesting

      NEVER trust a DVD writer review that praises plextor? Plextor *USED* to make the best writers, but their 740 series has a VERY HIGH failure rate, and the 716 is actually a remarked Benq drive!

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    9. Re:Some Advice by kukyfrope · · Score: 1

      Not only that, but the QUALITY of the burn, meaning, how many errors are actually on the disc. This can be checked with Nero CD-DVD Speed that comes packaged with Nero. Would you rather have a 10 minute burn with a few thousand errors or a 10 minute and 30 second burn with a few hundred errors? Again, this varies widely by media also.

    10. Re:Some Advice by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Never trust a DVD writer review that doesn't take into account burn quality and media compatibility.

      Ding, thank you. My Plextor external firewire DVD burner, which cost a rather pretty penny, claims to have all sorts of dodads to let it write to virtually everything, even lower quality media. "PowerRec" and some sort of angle adjustment widget, the whole 9 yards. 16x write and so on.

      Imagine my surprise when:

      • It could burn DVD's at 16x but couldn't burn a CD-R, even the Memorex brand Plextor suggests/includes samples of...at speeds over 8x. And even at 8x, it gets 'hung up' quite a bit. No improvement with several other kinds of media, including HP and Sony...it hangs as soon as it starts writing the lead-in, re-seeking and stopping/starting, eventually returning a "media sense error."
      • It can't read disks anywhere near as fast as it can write them. It'll happily write a 16x DVD. Then when I go to read from it, it starts at what sounds like -almost- 16x, but quickly drops down (and no, I don't mean the usual small variations the drive makes compensating for angular velocity.)

      Not exactly what I expected from the drive "techies" all seem to recommend, and the premium end of the market (I think the Sony external drive might have been more expensive, but didn't get as good reviews. How ironic.)

      The firmware has been updated about 6-7 times, and each time I've obliged. Most of the time, there's some entry about improving "burn strategy" and "media compatibility", but it still can't burn CD's faster than the 4-5 year old drive in my server box.

    11. Re:Some Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Here's my simple advice: NO BENQ DRIVES (nee Philips). I had a DW-1640 which with stock firmware couldn't install Ubuntu from a dvd. I needed a firware upgrade... just to make it work! What are Benq smoking? Buy an LG and be happy.

    12. Re:Some Advice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They really can't spell, eh.. makes their stuff less than trustworthy.

    13. Re:Some Advice by MagnusDredd · · Score: 1

      I want to know how well the drive reads a scratched up disk...

      These sites always test how fast these drives are in a controlled environment.

      With hard drives, it's understandable since most users use the drive in a controlled environment during normal usage. What I mean by this is; the platters are safely enclosed, and the worst that generally happens is heat build-up or ribbon damage.

      Optical drives, on the other hand, do not operate in anything resembling "ideal use" during normal operation. It would be nice to see how well these drives read damaged media. I'm certain that I'm in the majority when I say that I have more than a few disks that are in poor condition.

      I own a SCSI Plextor drive that has been nothing short of amazing with regards to reading damaged CDs. It's old and somewhat slow but it has read disks that my Sony, Pioneer, and Aopen drives wouldn't. What's actually more important to me than a minute or two of burn time is that the drive will actually read my disks, scratched or not (within reason). What I'd truly like to know is how these drives would read when subjected to various levels of scratched up media (accuracy, speed, etc).

      I'm very curious if the Plextor is still king of the heap in this regard. The problem is that no one tests this.

    14. Re:Some Advice by ManOPiano · · Score: 1
      NEVER trust a DVD writer review that praises plextor? Plextor *USED* to make the best writers, but their 740 series has a VERY HIGH failure rate, and the 716 is actually a remarked Benq drive!

      This is bull. The 716 is the best burner out there, and it did have some initial batch quality issues, but those have been resolved. Benq does not produce that drive.

    15. Re:Some Advice by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Not exactly what I expected from the drive "techies" all seem to recommend, and the premium end of the market

      Don't be surprised. It's ALL going downhill now. All the great quality brands you could depend on, have turned to crap in the past few years. The expensive Plextor drive you bought was probably manufactured in the same Chinese plant as a $30 NEC drive.

      In my experience, just about everything I've bought in the past several years has failed at about the 2 year mark.

      What's the solution? I really don't know. Look up some customer reviews on the cheapest units to make sure they work, and then buy it with the 4-year warranty which costs as much as the drive...

      (I think the Sony external drive might have been more expensive, but didn't get as good reviews. How ironic.)

      Sonys have just been re-badged Lite-Ons for many years now. In my experience, Sony is getting to be the worst of the worst now.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    16. Re:Some Advice by winwar · · Score: 1

      "Plextor *USED* to make the best writers, but their 740 series has a VERY HIGH failure rate, and the 716 is actually a remarked Benq drive!"

      Never trust someone who gives incorrect information. The Plextor 740 is a remarked BENQ drive (as is the SONY DRU810a). Of course, the BENQ has more features and is cheaper than the rebadged drive, if you can find it.....

      The 716 is a nice drive if cost is no object. The BENQ is the best drive for the money (DW1640).

    17. Re:Some Advice by PenGun · · Score: 0

      BenQ DW-1640 ... probably the best DVD burner widely available. Flash your firmware fool.

        I have a Plextor 740 because it is the same hardware. Stock firmware is fairly crappy, flashed to latest Plextor firmware 1.01 not bad. Flashed to the latest BenQ 1640 firmware it rocks hard.

        All burners _need_ to be kept up to date with firmware. The difference can be amazing.

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

    18. Re:Some Advice by Reziac · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, rebadged LiteOn CDRWs are not as good as own-name LiteOns -- supposed to be something to do with the firmware. Dunno about here, but with other rebadged components, that often means the chips themselves are seconds.

      Myself, I have a bunch of own-name LiteOn CDRWs and DVD-ROMs in heavy use with zero problems (I've yet to see one fail). I just got an own-name LiteOn DVD writer, hopefully it'll be the workhorse its older kin have been.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    19. Re:Some Advice by evilviper · · Score: 1

      Maybe the electronics in LiteOns will last for years, but the drives are (all?) defective from day one.

      You get crazy things, such as the drive needing to be closed by software to be able to set the recording speed, different recording modes that simply don't work, standard recording modes that leave out certain bits of information (like subchannel data) making it completely non-standard, and playable only in devices which ignore the standard to comply with LiteOn's completely disregard for quality.

      Sorry for the rant, but this is all crap I've had to put up with (first hand) from LiteOn drives for years.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    20. Re:Some Advice by Reziac · · Score: 1

      I don't do any special-format burning, so can't speak to that, tho do have to wonder how much of what you mention is the drive, and how much the burning software? I know there were compatibility issues with video disks written by some versions of Roxio.

      As to data disks (written with plain old Nero, which I detest but use because it writes no coasters) my LiteOns have been 100% reliable, and two of 'em have done a number of marathon burn sessions. And I've never seen one of their drives die (unlike Yamahas, where all 20 that I've been able to track died early deaths, and wrote disks that died early as well).

      Oh well, goes to show not all hardware likes everyone :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    21. Re:Some Advice by evilviper · · Score: 1
      tho do have to wonder how much of what you mention is the drive, and how much the burning software? I know there were compatibility issues with video disks written by some versions of Roxio.

      I can assure you it is 100% the drive. I don't use Windows/Mac at all, so all my burning is done with cdrecord, cdrdao, burncd, dvdrecord, etc. etc.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    22. Re:Some Advice by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Hmmmm... so you're on some species of *NIX?
      Still wonder if it could be a glitch in your burning software? as you're the only such case I've heard of, and not only myself but also all my clients use LiteOn drives, w/o any problems.

      Or maybe it's something in the LiteOn firmware that's not completely compatible with your setup?

      Very often the "obvious culprit" isn't really at fault, or is not the whole story... frex the "47 day rollover bug" in Win9x: It does *not* affect ALL Win9x systems (at least three of mine are not affected, and I've heard of others); at this point I'm pretty sure this bug requires a matching system timer (hardware) bug to manifest. Might be you're running into something like that.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    23. Re:Some Advice by evilviper · · Score: 1
      Still wonder if it could be a glitch in your burning software? as you're the only such case I've heard of, and not only myself but also all my clients use LiteOn drives, w/o any problems.

      I'm certainly not the only one with the issue. It's well-known that Lite-on drives don't write subchannel data, causing problems particularly with older audio CD players which expect that info. You can just try to set your drive to a slightly lower speed and watch it still record at maximum (4X was the only expection in my experience).

      Anyhow, these are usually the kinds of problems that you won't even notice if you only use the discs on a computer. Audio CD players, VCD players, DVD players etc., are when you start seeing symptoms of Lite-on's dedication to broken-ness.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    24. Re:Some Advice by Reziac · · Score: 1

      Well, maybe I'm just lucky :) or haven't ever done what's needed to run into the issue; I don't have any non-PC playback equipment. However friends use their burned disks with various standalone players and haven't complained of anything amiss. Tho I know some players are very fussy, while others will play any piece of crap.

      If you've got a link to documentation of the problem, I'd be interested in seeing it.

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. Dual Layer by mysqlrocks · · Score: 4, Informative

    And we weren't even able to find anybody to sell us dual-layer DVD-Rs!

    Wow, really? Where did they look?
    http://froogle.google.com/froogle?q=dual-layer+DVD -R

    1. Re:Dual Layer by klui · · Score: 1

      Maybe they meant "we weren't able to find any company to give us 20-30 dual-layer DVD-Rs for us to play with"

    2. Re:Dual Layer by rob_squared · · Score: 1
      --
      I don't get it.
    3. Re:Dual Layer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've walked into a lot of smaller electronics shops lately trying to find the best price on dual-layer discs. The sales staff keep telling me "we don't have them, they're not that popular yet." Really guys? If they aren't that popular why are Future Shop and Best Buy carrying them? Why is Steve shipping iMacs to average users with dual-layer burners built right in?

    4. Re:Dual Layer by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      i see hem in both walmart and bestbuy, but for the price i can use 3 single layer and still come out ahead

    5. Re:Dual Layer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? I bought a Sony DL writer a couple months ago and had a terrible time finding media. I think I had gone to about a dozen stores with computer areas (Circuit City, where I'd bought the drive, didn't carry them) until I found some and even then just a single brand. Here I had put off buying such a burner for, what, two years and the support _still_ wasn't there...

    6. Re:Dual Layer by All+Names+Have+Been · · Score: 1

      I know DVD DLs have hit the mainstream. The grocery store down the street sells them. Expensive (3 for $11) but they're there. They're right next to the crayons.

    7. Re:Dual Layer by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      Discs are about $2 each if you can find them in a cakebox. (I have some 8x +R DL media in-transit to me now that I paid $40 for a cakebox of 25. Got them from NewEgg.)

      3 for $11 isn't too bad. Similar to the prices of DVD 4GB media a few years back.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  6. ALL about DvD by earthstar · · Score: 4, Informative
    On a related note, http://www.dvddemystified.com/ has all the info about DvD's on its DvD FAQ http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html.

    Also see my journal about Nero 7 DvD burning probs.In short ,stick with Nero Version 6.X

  7. cheap = good by GweeDo · · Score: 1

    $40 Lite-On DVD burner. Never failed me. I love it.

    1. Re:cheap = good by SimReg · · Score: 1

      Yeah? Where is the Lite-On burner? I guess they didn't pay enough to get the review...

    2. Re:cheap = good by Halthar · · Score: 1

      I want to second this. I have 10 Lite-On drives in my apartment, and not a single one has ever given me problems. For the price they make the best product I have seen where CD and DVD writers/readers are concerned. If I am not mistaken quite a few drives out there are rebranded Lite-Ons (I could be wrong about this, admittedly).

    3. Re:cheap = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The NEC in this review is only 40.00.

    4. Re:cheap = good by robgamble · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's just sick how cheap this hardware has gotten! I haven't looked at DVD writer prices in soooo long. Now you can get the NEC model from TFA (actually the next model up) for $38. You can pick one up for the price of a video game.

      --
      No sig for you!
    5. Re:cheap = good by SydBarrett · · Score: 1

      I've had 2 liteon drives (both cd-rw) die on me. Each lasted about 9 months at the most and both dies from some mechcanial problem, since right before they died, they made some wierd grinding noise. They also got pretty hot quickly too. Right now I have a NEC dvd writer that runs much cooler for about the same price as the old liteon drives.

    6. Re:cheap = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      > Lite-ON

      Ugh! Dell uses them in computers, and some models have a near 100% failure rate! Do some research before recommending garbage like that.

      As an example, in the last batch of 480 computers we bought from Dell, we've replaced almost 600 Lite-On DVD/CDR drives. That's more than 1 per computer. The only reason we haven't replaced more than that is that we've started replacing the drives with Sony's that we pay for out of our pocket rather than using the Dell 3 year on-site warranty we paid a lot of money for. Dell doesn't give a damn about their customers, so they continue to screw us over by continuing to use those pitiful drives, so we had to pay for our own drives out of our pocket.

    7. Re:cheap = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I bought the lastest and greatest from NEC a year ago, and the first one never worked properly, so I returned it after a few days. I got an identical one from the same shop, and after four or five days it just died. Around the same time, two of my friends also bought NEC and they also died (two others also bought, though they did not die).
      I bought a Lite-ON drive instead, and since then I've been burning around 75 DVDs a month with it, and not a single hiccough, it's stable as HELL. Lite-ON rocks! :)

    8. Re:cheap = good by Shanep · · Score: 1

      $40 Lite-On DVD burner. Never failed me. I love it.

      I agree. I currently have a DVDRW DL (desktop size) Lite-On, a DVDRW DL (laptop size) Lite-On, 2x CDRW Lite-On's (one Lite-On branded, the other Iomega which I have sinced kept up to date with Lite-On firmware updates), a DVDROM Lite-On and an NEC DVDRW. I also recommend Lite-On to all my customers and have had far too much experience with Pioneer DVDRW drives.

      I have never had a Lite-On go bad on me, they perform fantastically and they are very cheap. Chances are, that if you buy some name brand drive like Sony, Iomega, etc, you are actually buying a Lite-On (except that Sony logo will cost you another $20). Even if your drive is detected in software as being a Sony for example, this is simply due to the customized firmware.

      I had a LOT of trouble with my NEC DVDRW drive, until eventually (a YEAR or more later) a decent firmware was released which fixed the issues. I did not take it back because it came with a VERY cheap Compaq desktop, which I think may have been cheap due to the initially crappy NEC drive.

      I have had extremely bad problems with Pioneer DVDRW drives with a few of my customers which bought them. BEWARE BUYING PIONEER IN AUSTRALIA! If you buy a drive without the Pioneer official hologram sticker on the top, it means that the drive came into Australia outside of official Pioneer channels and thus Pioneer REFUSE to support them AT ALL. EVERY Pioneer DVDRW drive I have tried to get going for these customers, either fails to burn or makes coasters EVERY SINGLE TIME! No amount of firmware updating has fixed them. I recommended my customers get refunds and buy Lite-On and I have since scratched Pioneer off my list for optical drives permanently. Shit drives, shit support for customers who thought they were buying Pioneer supported Pioneer drives.

      Sony by the way (and some other big name brands) provide little to no firmware support, which is why I am thankful that Lite-On based Sony drives can be flashed with Lite-On firmware updates. You get better media support and the drive will also be detected as what it really is.

      Lite-On provides those rare products which are both cheapest and best.

      I don't work for Lite-On by the way, I'm just raving because I love the fact that there is actually a company which makes great products at an excellent price.

      Funny thing however... I did have a Lite-On based CDRW drive die, a little over a year after purchase, in a customer machine in a very hot and dusty area... however it was a Sony branded unit. That server has since been cooled somewhat and the replacement Lite-On is going great. ; )

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    9. Re:cheap = good by Shanep · · Score: 2, Interesting

      > Lite-ON

      This post is hilarious for so many reasons.

      Ugh! Dell uses them in computers, and some models have a near 100% failure rate!

      Bullshit. No model of ANYTHING that has a "100% failure rate" will remain available for long.

      Do some research before recommending garbage like that.

      Anyone who did research Lite-On quality, will find most people have very good things to say about them.

      As an example, in the last batch of 480 computers we bought from Dell, we've replaced almost 600 Lite-On DVD/CDR drives. That's more than 1 per computer.

      Did you try upgrading the firmware yourselves (to a real Lite-On firmware) or just get the Dell morons to replace the drives with the same drives with same potentially broken firmware? I have had terrible trouble with Dell in the past too, but that was trouble with DELL. I call complete and utter bullshit on this post.

      The only reason we haven't replaced more than that is that we've started replacing the drives with Sony's that we pay for out of our pocket rather than using the Dell 3 year on-site warranty we paid a lot of money for.

      Ahhh, here's an education for you then... Sony CDRW drives are made by... wait for it... Lite-On. Oh, and they are not made to Sony specification or design, they are Lite-On designed and built, with slightly modified firmware to pretend to be a Sony, complete with Sony top sticker and Sony faceplate. I'm not sure how many Sony DVDRW drives are made by Lite-On, but I beleive I have seen at least one laptop Sony DVDRW drive with, oddly enough, a Lite-On sticker on top.

      Dell doesn't give a damn about their customers, so they continue to screw us over by continuing to use those pitiful drives, so we had to pay for our own drives out of our pocket.

      Yes, Dell sucks. Lite-On however, do not churn out "pitiful drives". This I can state with absolute certainty and authority. They may have made some less than fantastic models, but I don't know of any. The general drive quality coming out of Lite-On is top notch. Which is why MANY VERY VERY BIG brand names are confident in letting Lite-On make "thier" drives.

      The truth, is probably that Dell modified the Lite-On OEM firmware, as is typical, and fucked it up, as is typical of Dell.

      --
      War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
    10. Re:cheap = good by toddestan · · Score: 1

      Ahhh, here's an education for you then... Sony CDRW drives are made by... wait for it... Lite-On. Oh, and they are not made to Sony specification or design, they are Lite-On designed and built, with slightly modified firmware to pretend to be a Sony, complete with Sony top sticker and Sony faceplate. I'm not sure how many Sony DVDRW drives are made by Lite-On, but I beleive I have seen at least one laptop Sony DVDRW drive with, oddly enough, a Lite-On sticker on top.

      Well, I guess that would explain why I consider Sony and Lite-On to be the best two types of optical drives out there. With Lite-On usually being within a few dollars of the cheapest brand, why get anything else?

    11. Re:cheap = good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Did you try upgrading the firmware yourselves

      How's firmware going to fix hardware problems? The trays stopped working.

      As bad as Dell is, how can you blame them for a problem with Lite-On drives? Your agenda is showing.

    12. Re:cheap = good by laptop006 · · Score: 1

      Pioneer just don't like supporting Australia full stop, I bought a DVR-K05 for my laptop and just needed the CSEL firmware for it, but they don't have it on their site (despite being shipped with some drives mine wasn't) I tried e-mailing then and got told that they don't support them. But I still bought a 110 for my desktop the other week, as they are the best burners I've used.

      --
      /* FUCK - The F-word is here so that you can grep for it */
  8. Mt Rainier ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    None of the drives reviewed have Mt. Rainier functionality. I thought that was to become ubiquitous by now. Aren't Mt. Rainier error recovery aspects the only way DVD can compete with DVD RAM for data discs?

    1. Re:Mt Rainier ?? by Phoenixhunter · · Score: 1

      I think this is yet another case of manufacturers focusing on speed, rather than rounding out functionality. That said, we've hit the max speed for DVD reading/writing at 16x, so maybe we'll see some traction there.

    2. Re:Mt Rainier ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Forget Mt. Rainer, it has been years since it was first announced but the supported list never get more than 5 models. The website also hasn't been updated in years.

      In short, it's dead.

  9. Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Still, who's interested in burning to dual-layer when the price of two single-layer DVDs is well below the cost of one dual-layer?

    People who want to make totally legal Fair Use backups of games they get from blockbuster of course.

    1. Re:Hmmm by MCraigW · · Score: 1
      Still, who's interested in burning to dual-layer when the price of two single-layer DVDs is well below the cost of one dual-layer?

      If you have a file that is larger than a single-layer DVD, it is much more convenient to back up to one dual-layer than to two single-layer DVDs. Like a Ghost of a drive for instance.

    2. Re:Hmmm by John+Muir · · Score: 1

      Yes, that comment (even more than the charts being in the wrong order) sinks the plausibility of the review entirely.

      Who cares? SOMEONE WITH A FREAKING 5+ GIGABYTE FILE FFS!!

      What idiot chose this writer to do the article? Someone who doesn't get why bigger media is better has as much competence on DVD burners as a non-gamer / high end user does on the latest and most expensive graphics cards.

  10. What about noise? by SCO+STINKS · · Score: 0

    When I build computers I tend to prefer drives that do not sound like jet engines while running. I recently purchased a lite on dvd burner that was louder than a vacume cleaner. NEC seems to do the best job at making quiet drives.

    --
    Reason #32767 not to use VB6: Integers are 2 bytes... Think about it!
  11. I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. by El+Cubano · · Score: 1

    First, thanks to the article submitter for supplying the "printable" version of the article and aleviating us from having to click through 20 "pages" of reviews.

    Second, I own a black ND-3540A that I got from Newegg three months ago for $38.00. It is very nice and replaced a generic CD-RW drive that was just terribly loud. Newegg doesn't stock the ND-3540A anymore. However, they do have the ND-3550A for about $40.00, which is a very good price (you better hurry because they are limited, 500 to a customer :).

    Anyhow, I use this thing on Debian Sarge with a slightly customized kernel and dvd+rw-tools. It works very nicely and, IME, burns at the advertised speed, which let me burn a downloaded episode of that new Star Trek fan-based production (I forget the name, exactly) that is only available online. Of course, in addition to burning at the advertised speed, it is much quieter than many other drives I have used. I definitely recommend it, especially if you are a *nix user, as I have encountered no problems at all with it in that respect.

    1. Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. by MrP-(at+work) · · Score: 1

      I have wanted a dvd burner for years but i could never decide what one to get, i wanted to get the best one for the money and i didnt want to do any detailed researching (im lazy)

      So i see this article, i scroll to the conclusion part of the article. The two winners, the ND-3540A and the toshiba that isn't out yet. I do a quick search for ND-3540A, wow only $44

      A few minutes later, and I just ordered my first DVD burner!

      Thanks slashdot =P

      --
      [an error occurred while processing this directive]
    2. Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. by Peter+H.S. · · Score: 1

      ...I definitely recommend it, especially if you are a *nix user, as I have encountered no problems at all with it in that respect.

      Being able to flash it from Linux was the deciding factor when I bought the NEC ND-3540A. See http://binflash.cdfreaks.com/

      Never had the the chance to try it since the drive went dead after less than 4 months, having burned less than 10 discs in total. Perhaps it died from underuse? Well...

      --
      Regards

    3. Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 1

      I've had some pretty good luck playing some fairly well scratched up DVDs from Netflix using my 3540. The same DVDs didn't play or skipped in a couple of other players.

    4. Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

      For the last 2 years, DVD writers have become so cheap ($30-$40, dual-format) that it barely makes sense to save $20 and buy a regular DVD-ROM drive. We no longer order laptops without burner capability.

      All of my home-built desktop machines now have burners. Even if I don't have burner software installed, I can always borrow those drives for use in the other machines if one breaks.

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    5. Re:I have the ND-3540A, and it rocks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When I opens the link it isn't a printable version, maybe Tom's aware of this and remove that function. In my memory Tom's never been keen to provide printable versions.

  12. Re:ALL about DvD by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    I recently upgraded from an old plextor CDR-writer + Nero 6 to a plextor DVD-writer + Nero 7. I can honestly say that after the 7.0.1.4 update for Nero, it was night and day for me.

  13. Re:What's the physical difference? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Track width tolerance. The faster the disc spins, the more it matters.

  14. Author read results backwards! by harryk · · Score: 0

    Is it me, or is the author of the article reading the times backwards. When measuring seem times in ms, smaller is better, meaning it took less time to find a segment of data. He states the Toshiba had the best times in the first two result graphs, yet they have the HIGHEST seek times...

    Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I think the author needs to double check is verbage, and think about how he's testing...

    harryk

    --
    think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
    1. Re:Author read results backwards! by harryk · · Score: 1

      Never mind, I mis-read the results, stupid assumption on my part to believe the order he tested in was the order in which they were originally listed in the article. Oh well...

      harryk

      --
      think before you write, it'll save me moderator points.
  15. Re:ALL about DvD (sic) by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    In English, all letters in an acronym are capitalized. You wrote DvD when it really is DVD.

  16. Support (manufacturer/store) is also important by dusanv · · Score: 1

    I just got a Pioneer 110D from a sneaky local store. It died 20 days later and as it turns out the store will only warranty their stuff for 2 weeks (nasty, that's posted nowhere and it's not on the receipt). Now, I'm trying to get Pioneer to fix it but they are saying that they have none in stock and are urging it me to deal with the store. The store in the mean time reversed their stance and is now offering to exchange the drive for $20 ("shipping" to the distributor). Anyway, a whole lot of fun. Last Pioneer I buy...

    1. Re:Support (manufacturer/store) is also important by autocracy · · Score: 1

      Bought on credit card? Call the card company.

      --
      SIG: HUP
    2. Re:Support (manufacturer/store) is also important by dusanv · · Score: 1

      They don't take credit cards (I guess I know why now). Good idea though.

  17. Did they use the same media for all their testing? by mmell · · Score: 3, Interesting
    After all, I've seen huge differences for both CD-R and DVD+R performance caused by using different brands of media. I've even had outright failures while using Maxcel brand media (ymmv, that's just my experience).

    In the CD-RW and DVD-RW arena, I'll be slower to judge as I haven't seen the same kind of variances; then again, once I've purchased RW media, I don't need to purchase more so I haven't seen a wide variety of brands in this area. I suspect that a similar situation exists.

    I haven't even touched DL-R or DL-RW yet - the media costs are prohibitive. Who wants to pay 8-10x as much per platter for a medium which only delivers around 1.8x the data density?

    In the end, I'm not too sure I care so much about write times (hey, I can spare a few extra seconds when I burn a DVD or CD - it's not like I do so for a living), so much as data reliability, medium durability, media cost and compatibility.

    Bottom line - while the drive is important, it's nothing without the media; so long as the drive functions correctly, it seems likely that there's more to be gained by selecting the proper media for use in the drive.

  18. Re:ALL about DvD (sic) by earthstar · · Score: 1

    Well,I do know that,but writing 'DvD' seems to somewhat look like the DVD logo.[for me atleast]

  19. Froogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here you can get deals on Froogle

    1. Re:Froogle by Ced_Ex · · Score: 1

      Here you can get deals on Froogle[tubgirl.com]

      Nice try....

      --
      Live forever, or die trying.
    2. Re:Froogle by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is this better?

      Here you can get deals on Froogle

  20. Strange things... by yuretz · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've noticed that strange things happen with storage technology. First we had 5.25" floppies. I used the same 5.25" floppies for months and had no troubles with bad sectors and unreadable files. Than 3.5" appeared and we have just realized that old-style floppies are not reliable and loosing data due to disk error is really easy. 3.5" disk was hard to damage and could be used for months or even years. After that, the era of CDs/CD-R/CD-RW began. Diskettes again appeared very unreliable. At some moment, I've realized that I'm not sure that I'll be able to read data written on the floppy I bought yesterday! But, CD-R or CD-RW seemed everlasting and very, very, very reliable storage medium. There was no such thing like unreadable CD. The CD drive speeds was growing, but the quality and reliability was going down! Now we have DVD era, and when I burn a CD with my CD-RW, I always check that the data was written correctly and can be read. Sometimes, I have even to burn a disk two times to be absolutely sure. Probably the DVD storage medium will have the same fate. Will it ever end?

    1. Re:Strange things... by klui · · Score: 2, Informative

      Stop using cheap (rather than inexpensive, but good) media. Taiyo Yuden and Verbatim are good brands.

    2. Re:Strange things... by yuretz · · Score: 1

      I know nothing about Taiyo Yuden, but I agree that Verbatim is really good, and I use the their CD-R/RW regularly. Nevertheless, I think the problem is not in media, but in manufacturer's market strategy.

    3. Re:Strange things... by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      In related news... after Gillette released the Mach 3 razor, the quality of replacement blades for their older razors went down. I don't think it is a conspiracy to sell the new stuff, that's just a fortunate side effect (from Gillette's perspective). It's really because they quit investing in upkeep to the production lines for the old stuff.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    4. Re:Strange things... by klui · · Score: 1

      Taiyo Yuden was the first company to create the CD-R.

    5. Re:Strange things... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > First we had 5.25" floppies

      First, we had 8" floppies!

  21. Re:cheap != good by tomcres · · Score: 1

    FWIW, cheap is not necessarily good. But LiteOn is excellent. I've owned lots of LiteOn drives of every flavor, and I've been more than pleased with all of them. Then again, there are some expensive drives I've had trouble with, mainly Sony, and I had a Plextor which was a nightmare. I think what it comes down to is the drive manufacturer. Price does not necessarily reflect this, but it would be wrong to say without qualification that cheap is good. Also, realize that some brands are rebadges and sometimes you don't even get the same drive in identically marked boxes. I generally will stick with Pioneer or LiteOn these days (although I've had good experiences with LG and Panasonic, also.. in fact my old LG burner used to do DAE better than my [newer] Samsung CD-ROM drive, which was kind of weird). I used to like Plextor a lot, but after the experience I had with my last Plextor (or series of Plextors, if you count the in-warranty replacements), I'll never buy one again. But in my experience, you really can't go wrong with LiteOn.

  22. "True speeds" by texaport · · Score: 1
    Tom's Hardware has a writeup on the latest DVD writers and their 'true speeds'

    Would someone tell them 14:03 and 14:06 are not four times faster than 6:09 timings? A "true speed" 8X works for me.

    And I delved far enough into the meat of the article to see that they mixed up captions and pictures for +R and -R at 16X

  23. This write=up sucks dick... by Privoxy · · Score: 1

    The latest firmware for the Pioneer 110 is 1.37, not 1.22.

  24. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  25. 5 Burners by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

    They tested a whole 5 DVD-RWs? Wow.

    Jaysyn

    --
    There is a war going on for your mind.
    1. Re:5 Burners by sconeu · · Score: 1

      Yeah, where's the LiteOn 1693? Great burner!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    2. Re:5 Burners by Jaysyn · · Score: 1

      Good deal, that's the one I just got for my brother.

      Jaysyn

      --
      There is a war going on for your mind.
  26. Arn't you using your optical drives less and less? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't know about you but I use my optical drives less and less. It's a whole lost easier to transfer files on flash memory. The only reason to keep an optical drive is because game and music publishers insist on distributing content in this old-fashioned way.

  27. Whatever works. by ShyGuy91284 · · Score: 1

    My burner just bit the dust (unburnt ring in middle sometimes, two years old), and I just got the best rated on on newegg ("beige" model since the black was out, same burner though). Good enough for me w/ it only costing $40.

    --
    In undeveloped countries, the consumer controls the market. In capitalist America, the market controls you.
  28. how about noise? by escay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    it's about time the decibel level of drives is also looked at - what now with super silent SATA HDs and PSUs, the loudest component turns out to be the DVD drive. currently the user reviews from newegg are all we have for noise levels of the drives...

    1. Re:how about noise? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you can get spin limiter utilities that prevent the drive from spinning up to max speed which dramatically reduces the noise and for lots of activities such as viewing dvd movies and stuff has zero impact on performannce

  29. Majoritatively by floodo1 · · Score: 0

    As you can see from this review, problems continue in terms of media availability for DVD writers - perhaps more than ever. ...
    For this article, we visited all the stores to see what types of media are actually available for sale, and once again the result was most enlightening. You can find 16x-compatible -R and +R discs, but in the other formats they simply aren't out there.</i>

    I wonder how many people practically use anything besides +/- R???

    <i>Makers should be honest with us and change statements like "Writes at 16x" to "Writes at up to 16x."</i>

    umm DUH! i thought that was common knowledge :(

    finally one last complaint: the make comments like "Though we used media certified at 16x and recognized as such by all the writers, we never attained a speed of 16x." they have graphs showing time. How does time correlate to speed? they never bother to mention that.

    just another shameful example of how poor quality toms hardware is nowadays :(

    ps- why no benq review? and like EVERYONE else said, burn quality is important to a very large group of people.

    --
    I KUT J00 M4NG!!!
  30. Mt Rainer & DVD+RAM ? by Vladimir · · Score: 1

    To me it looks like the current DVD drives reached the reasonable limits at DVD+/-R and RW. The write speed is only x2 better than that of x4 drive, so not much reason to upgrade. The DL is unlikely to matter, as media is very expensive and higher capacity drives are on the way. However, what happened to the MtRainer/EasyWrite support? None of the drives still support it? Looks like NEC 4550 does support DVD-RAM, but the drive is still not available in the US and it's not clear how it will compare to DVD+MRW in terms of usability. For example, it would be cool to boot from Knoppix, customize it a bit (small things like wireless keys, printers, proxies, NIS, etc.) and keep configuration right on the same media.

  31. Re:'definitely' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'definitely' not 'definately'

    getting sick of seeing this

  32. Re:cheap != good by greed · · Score: 1
    I've got LG for my cheap writer, after being quite happy with their CD-ROM and DVD-ROM drives. It's worked a treat. My first DVD burner was a Pioneer A04, mainly 'cause of Mac OS compatibility. By that same logic, I replaced the A04 with a 110D, which isn't Mac OS officially supported--but it no longer matters, because Tiger doesn't care as much and I know about PatchBurn now anyway.

    The LG has been more reliable at linked packet writing than the very slightly more expensive Pioneer 110D. Both of them do Disk-At-Once nicely. I recently switched backup media to DVD+R from -R, and upgraded the Pioneer's firmware, and put them both on USB 2.0 instead of FireWire, and they both work well now. Something about the Pioneer and my cheapo USB + FireWire cages was resulting in complete FireWire bus hangs.

    So LG, despite being Goldstar + some other companies, is gaining marks in my books.

  33. LiteOn = KProbe by eddy · · Score: 1

    Lite-On is also one of few brands for which you can actually verify the burn quality. Well, you can if you believe in Kprobe.

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  34. BDR-101A by heroine · · Score: 1

    The BDR-101A is the best optical recorder and it hasn't even hit stores yet. If you're wondering why we're still discussing DVD recorders, maybe it's because BDR-101A is depressing DVD recorder sales.

  35. Re:Second by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'll second your second. NEC makes some good drives right now.

    I've had a 3520 for a year or so -rock solid, perfect burner. It was so good, I put that burner in a computer I built for someone as a gift, because I knew it was totally proven and reliable and wouldn't need support.

    Also have a 3540 in another PC and it seems to be working just fine with admittedly low miles. And I recently got a 3550 to replace the 3520. This one broke Nero 6.xx.18 so I haven't actually burned anything with it. Hoping for the best.

    I used to be a Liteon buyer but my last Liteon 16x burner ceased wanting to write CD-Rs after six months of age. A friend has had similar problems with his Liteon 16x drives and total failure on a 4x and 8x. He's also switched to NEC and had zero problems.

  36. cdrinfo.com by Khopesh · · Score: 1
    Highly conclusive, a large plethora of extensive tests, and an easy-to-read rating system on the last page of every review. they have sections for DVD recorders by speed, or just DVD+rw DL writers, plus several other optical formats (cdrw, combo, blue laser ...).

    Take a look at the CDRinfo Optical Storage section.

    --
    Use my userscript to add story images to Slashdot. There's no going back.
  37. Re:Arn't you using your optical drives less and le by juhaz · · Score: 1

    For small files, yes. But DVD sized flash is still quite expensive, and read/write speeds of many flash memories tend to be rather low, I wouldn't be surprised if optical drives are sometimes faster in gigabyte range.

  38. What about reliability? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find most reviews of CD/DVD-ROM/R/RW only partly usable, because they always focus on speed. But it is hard to find information on reliability, because it is difficult to measure whereas speed is easy to measure.

    I mean reliability when reading (how well does the drive read marginal media) and reliability when writing (how long will the recording last and if the marginal readers be able to read the media). This depends on the quality of CD/DVD blanks also, but more reliable drive will also make better quality record on the media.

    Personally I am willing to sacrifice the speed and pay some more for a drive which is better in this regard, but it's hard to find the data which drives are better.

  39. Re:ALL about DvD (sic) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Douchebag.

  40. Media Problem by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

    How many people own very high speed DVD writers? Single digit percents? If you're making media, and your exisiting line is already quite profitable for the 90%+ writers already out there, you don't have a lot of incentive to push out the new stuff yet.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  41. How do they test? by jtgd · · Score: 1

    How do the manufacturers test their drives for these higher writing speeds if there is no media available? Is there sample media available only to them, or do they simply trust that when the media arrives it will work?

    --
    J
  42. Pitiful by PenGun · · Score: 0

    A useless set of near numbers. Just a few media types, poor tests, a waste of time. Tom has gone way downhill.

        PenGun
      Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

  43. Re:Did they use the same media for all their testi by karnal · · Score: 1

    while using Maxcel brand media

    Ahh. See, it's not your media that's at fault. It's your Sorny burner!

    --
    Karnal
  44. Speed schmeed by archeopterix · · Score: 1

    Speed isn't everything. I prefer a slower disk with a region-free firmware update available over a faster one that lets the MPAA restrict how I use my property.

    1. Re:Speed schmeed by Reziac · · Score: 1

      16x DVD is 48x CD. As I recall, CD media starts turning to shrapnel at speeds over 56x, so that is the practical max -- ie. 18.3x for DVD, if there could be such a speed.

      And yep, if I had to choose, I'd rather have a slower unit that does it right, and isn't beholden to some special interest.

      (As it is, I just bought a LiteOn DVD DL writer, mainly cuz I have 6 LiteOn CDRW and DVD-ROM units that have been 100% reliable in heavy use.)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
  45. Linux script ... Eye Patch On by PenGun · · Score: 0

    K this copys the DVD from the reader to the burner directly

    #!/bin/sh
    echo " * Eyepatch On!! Straight data dump to da DVD recorder *"
    rm stream.dvd
    mkfifo -m 666 stream.dvd &&
    sleep 1
    dd if=/dev/dvd1 of=stream.dvd &
    sleep 1
    growisofs -dvd-compat -Z /dev/dvd=stream.dvd &&
    echo " * Eyepatch Off ... \"I feel empty\" :Zorak *"

      The sleep keeps fast machines from tripping over themselves.
      Assuming /dev/dvd1 as reader and /dev/dvd as burner.

      "dd is your friend" Linus Torvalds

          PenGun
        Do What Now ??? ... Standards and Practices !

  46. AMEN! by toadlife · · Score: 1

    I had read about Taiyo Yuden media and how great it was for a couple of years, but never saw any in the store so never bought any. After getting a DVD burner. and bveing repeatedly frustrated with store bought media (all the brands sucked), I googled and bought some Taiyo Tuden DVD media online.

    It absolutely rocks!

    I'll never use another brand.

    --
    I don't always use unix-like operating systems; but when I do, I prefer FreeBSD.
    1. Re:AMEN! by niktemadur · · Score: 1

      Absolutely. I have yet to make a single coaster with Taiyo Yuden.

      One of the things about TY is that their CDs and DVDs are actually manufactured in Japan, as opposed to, say, China or Taiwan. Chalk up another one against outsourcing. Yes, you have to go to the online stores to get them, but the price for a TY spindle is about the same as with any other mainstream DVD media out there.

      --
      Lil' Thindime, lilting a lacrimose lament, krashes the kwaint konfines of Kokonino Kounty
  47. Re:Did they use the same media for all their testi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Maxell drive. It's crap. I recommend Plextor (expensive) or Lite-On (cheap) for drives, chosen depending on your needs.

    I've used Maxell media. It's crap. Always use TDK. Always. They've not failed me even once in >10 years of burning. My first burn was on a Marantz standalone, red-book-only, real-time recorder in 1994. I used a 63-minute, 550MB, green-bottom TDK "Gold" disc. That disc is still in use now, going for 12 years later. It's ELO's "Time", digitally remastered by my dad, and played out of the DAW to the aforementioned Marantz burner. Track start/stop cues were done by hand. Ahhh, the bad ol' days... nothing was automagical... oh how it sucked... It sure was fun, though.

  48. A song to go with this story by trendyhendy · · Score: 1

    (sung to the tune of "Paperback Writer" by The Beatles)

    DVD writer, DVD writer.
    Dear Sir or Madam, got a new PC
    It took three grand to buy, do you want to see?
    It's got an Athlon and huge LCD,
    It's got everything,
    But it doesn't have a DVD writer,
    DVD writer.

    It's the latest model from the greatest brand,
    And it's highly spec'ed - I don't understand.
    It's overclocked to five gigahertz
    It's a speedy box,
    But I really want a DVD writer,
    DVD writer.
    DVD writer, DVD writer.

    It's got a thousand gigs, give or take a few.
    But I'll fill it up in a week or two.
    I could make it larger if I add a drive.
    I could burn it all,
    If I only had a DVD writer,
    DVD writer.

    Would you buy me one If I were really nice
    I could burn some movies for you overnight.
    If you have a spare you can send it here,
    But I need it now,
    And it has to be a DVD writer,
    DVD writer.
    DVD writer, DVD writer.
    DVD writer, DVD writer.
    DVD writer, DVD writer.
    DVD writer, DVD writer.
    DVD writer...

    1. Re:A song to go with this story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a great song, and a great comment. Please mod up !!

  49. Media Problem-Cure: share it with everyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "How many people own very high speed DVD writers?"

    Everyone with a broadband connection and "information wants to be free" attitude.

  50. Re:cheap != good by Shanep · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently switched backup media to DVD+R from -R, and upgraded the Pioneer's firmware, and put them both on USB 2.0 instead of FireWire, and they both work well now. Something about the Pioneer and my cheapo USB + FireWire cages was resulting in complete FireWire bus hangs.

    There is a USB2/Firewire chipset (Prolific PL-3507) which is just downright broken. The A revision is not flash upgradable without desoldering the chip and the subsequent revisions are flashable, however the "fixed" firmware is pretty much still broken. Unfortunately, there are a LOT of PL-3507 based USB2/Firewire units out there and it seems they are single handedly taking some shine of the perceived quality of IDE-Firewire enclosures. I wonder if that is what you had?

    The PL-3507 insists on using a fixed firewire ID, so you can't have more than one on a chain. Why anyone would want more than ZERO PL-3507's is beyond me however.

    I use a Lite-On DVDRW drive in an older Iomega USB2 CDRW cage to burn DVDR's on my Mac mini within Tiger. The "Iomega" CDRW drive I pulled out of it was actually a Lite-On LTR-5226S drive, with the Lite-On sticker on the top and the Iomega branded black faceplate. ; )

    --
    War crimes, torture, lies, illegal spying... Would someone give Bush a blowjob, already, so he can be impeached?
  51. He forgot to open his eyes? by kimvette · · Score: 1

    {
    And we weren't even able to find anybody to sell us dual-layer DVD-Rs!
    }

    Guess he didn't bother to check:
      - Sprawl*Mart
      - Target
      - Office Max
      - Comp USA

    They all have DL media on the shelf.

    Tom, get with the program! Also, where was Lite-On in the test? I used to pay the premium for Pioneer drives but with Pioneer's fussy appetite for "approved" media (when I bought my first DVD writer at $500 it wouldn't work with just ANY old 2X DVD media. If it wasn't on Pioneer's approved list, it would burn only at 1x. Bastards. That was NOT mentioned anywhere on the packaging, their web site, or anywhere else unless you downloaded TFM to R it before buying the product) I tried Lite-On and was surprised that such a cheap drive worked so damn well.

    --
    The Christian Right is Neither (Christian nor right). See: Matthew 23, Matthew 25, Ezekiel 16:48-50
  52. Re:Did they use the same media for all their testi by WuphonsReach · · Score: 1

    I haven't even touched DL-R or DL-RW yet - the media costs are prohibitive. Who wants to pay 8-10x as much per platter for a medium which only delivers around 1.8x the data density?

    You're spoiled by today's prices for media. Three years ago, you typically paid $2 or so per disc for 4GB media. (Which is the price point at which DVD media sales seem to have taken off.)

    8GB media is just getting below the $2 each price point. (There are cakeboxes that are around $2/disc.) So as volume goes up on them, we should see prices start to drop.

    I finally ordered my first cakebox of DL media this week.

    --
    Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
  53. Yes, I am. by mmell · · Score: 1
    However, the price per byte is still approximately five times as high for DL as opposed to +R (or +RW for that matter).

    It's called "skimming the market". The prices will drop . . . I'll wait.

    :^D