If you purchase a device second hand then you have not agreed to anything. Does their terms of service deny you the right to sell the device? Does their terms of service require you to inform the purchaser of any agreements? And if those are not the case, an they take your data and use it, then THEY have broken the law. Right?
Then can't they just draw an interface that lets them browse through book titles and post debits to their private account? If you eliminate Apple from handling the money, then will they assassinate the app? In other words, if Apple is not handling money for you, how can they take 30%?
I don't have an Iphone or an Ipad. How is Apple forcing this particular business to give them money? Refusing to host the app on their marketplace? Or threatening to remove the app from devices? Or terms and conditions of being a developer? What arm is Apple twisting that says "give me your money or die"?
They are equally entitled to clean drinking water. And the people who dont own the property in apartment complexes are not getting anything. And the locally grown produce getting sprayed with this stuff, which is then fed to kids, livestock. They arent getting paid. If they cannot mine this valuable substance without contaminating the water, then they should have to completely replace the water supply with water piped in from a clean location. Every house, every yard, every farm well replaced with free city water. Forever.
Say someone lands it on a rubbish heap or something, Its flat, quiet, drab. Camera is running. They watch a house. The target appears in a doorway for a second. Bing. The signal goes out. The target is painted. A global-hawk-predator-whatever that has been sitting on station for the past month refueling in-flight is tasked. Weapons free. The weapon follows in the laser. Boom. They could make it smaller with a top mounted camera so it could sit in on a haystack or on top of a barn. With just a fiber-optic camera sticking up. Heck, it could even have a solar panel to keep the camera transmitting for long periods.
If someone wants to turn a apache webserver into a "ftp site" using the http protocol, what is the best drop-in solution. One that does not involve programming. I found one that has progress bar and stuff, but I am sure there are others out there. What is the state of the art?
Apple likes to control everything....hardware and software. It might make sense to them to control both sides of the hardware transaction. The tower, and the phone.
I think they should buy bellsouth. And if you have an iPhone on a Apple carrier network, then you would be able to get features available in no other way. Maybe the phone could use a special protocol when talking with an Apple carrier. But I guess the cell towers are still privately owned right?
But many IP devices do not have built-in firewall, so you -still- want to run a border router firewall right? And if every machine is behind your border router, then those limitations are still going to apply. So you want to let certain traffic in to certain hosts. Some hosts are dmz, some hosts are very private, and some are in the middle. Its still a lot to manage. The only thing it solves is peer-to-peer communications right? But you are going to have to deal on a host by host and service by service basis which peer to peer protocols will be allowed in and wont be. Maybe NAT makes some kind of peer-to-peer relationships impossible. But, I dont think that IPv6 will make anything easy. And I think its going to permanently piss people off at the Internet and those responsible for the new design.
And connects to a drain at the bottom of a pit underneath a nuclear reactor. And this is to help when they wax the floors? This is to clean up after barbecues? This drain is used when the have the weekly trim everyones hair day underneath the reactors? Considering these buildings are supposed to be nearly hermetically sealed, why the snot do the plans call for a pipe that goes out the the friggin ocean?
Instead of trusting information from certificate authorities, the browsers should have the public key for the major size burned in and security hashed inside the browser itself. That way it can trust it is downloading a real update of itself from its real home. If you have already downloaded a hacked browser, then you are dead anyway. So along with a browser you should get burned in security for the major vendors. Security that does not rely on anyone that can lie to you.
I doubt that another judge will agree to hear any appeals on the case. I think they mostly cover for each other when being accused of bias, less they be accused themselves down the line. The case might be appealed on other grounds, but not because of some unproven level of bias by the ruling judge. You have to submit evidence that she is biased. She can simply say that using her special prudence powers, she is immune from such petty motivations. God bless America and all that.
Slashdot Mirror
If you purchase a device second hand then you have not agreed to anything. Does their terms of service deny you the right to sell the device? Does their terms of service require you to inform the purchaser of any agreements?
And if those are not the case, an they take your data and use it, then THEY have broken the law. Right?
Don't buy something you really don't want. Save your money and get the one you really want.
I knew they had acceptance criteria, but I didnt know they were using that to force people to pay them money. Its so .. tacky.
Then can't they just draw an interface that lets them browse through book titles and post debits to their private account? If you eliminate Apple from handling the money, then will they assassinate the app?
In other words, if Apple is not handling money for you, how can they take 30%?
In a few years, people will hate Apple as much as they hated Microsoft. And Apple is going to give them the reasons for free.
I don't have an Iphone or an Ipad. How is Apple forcing this particular business to give them money? Refusing to host the app on their marketplace? Or threatening to remove the app from devices? Or terms and conditions of being a developer? What arm is Apple twisting that says "give me your money or die"?
They are equally entitled to clean drinking water. And the people who dont own the property in apartment complexes are not getting anything. And the locally grown produce getting sprayed with this stuff, which is then fed to kids, livestock. They arent getting paid. If they cannot mine this valuable substance without contaminating the water, then they should have to completely replace the water supply with water piped in from a clean location. Every house, every yard, every farm well replaced with free city water. Forever.
heck, they could drop the thing from a plane.
Say someone lands it on a rubbish heap or something, Its flat, quiet, drab. Camera is running. They watch a house. The target appears in a doorway for a second. Bing. The signal goes out. The target is painted. A global-hawk-predator-whatever that has been sitting on station for the past month refueling in-flight is tasked. Weapons free. The weapon follows in the laser. Boom.
They could make it smaller with a top mounted camera so it could sit in on a haystack or on top of a barn. With just a fiber-optic camera sticking up. Heck, it could even have a solar panel to keep the camera transmitting for long periods.
The real damage would come from much further away.
If someone wants to turn a apache webserver into a "ftp site" using the http protocol, what is the best drop-in solution. One that does not involve programming. I found one that has progress bar and stuff, but I am sure there are others out there.
What is the state of the art?
ATT did buy them.
AT&T did not buy bellsouth.
Apple likes to control everything....hardware and software. It might make sense to them to control both sides of the hardware transaction. The tower, and the phone.
I think they should buy bellsouth. And if you have an iPhone on a Apple carrier network, then you would be able to get features available in no other way. Maybe the phone could use a special protocol when talking with an Apple carrier. But I guess the cell towers are still privately owned right?
You probably don't want your printers to be on a public address unless you like adverts. :)
And create a moving magnetic field over coils wound around the medium. Instant power.
But many IP devices do not have built-in firewall, so you -still- want to run a border router firewall right? And if every machine is behind your border router, then those limitations are still going to apply. So you want to let certain traffic in to certain hosts. Some hosts are dmz, some hosts are very private, and some are in the middle. Its still a lot to manage. The only thing it solves is peer-to-peer communications right? But you are going to have to deal on a host by host and service by service basis which peer to peer protocols will be allowed in and wont be.
Maybe NAT makes some kind of peer-to-peer relationships impossible. But, I dont think that IPv6 will make anything easy. And I think its going to permanently piss people off at the Internet and those responsible for the new design.
And connects to a drain at the bottom of a pit underneath a nuclear reactor. And this is to help when they wax the floors? This is to clean up after barbecues? This drain is used when the have the weekly trim everyones hair day underneath the reactors? Considering these buildings are supposed to be nearly hermetically sealed, why the snot do the plans call for a pipe that goes out the the friggin ocean?
That is what I meant. I should have been more clear.
Instead of trusting information from certificate authorities, the browsers should have the public key for the major size burned in and security hashed inside the browser itself. That way it can trust it is downloading a real update of itself from its real home. If you have already downloaded a hacked browser, then you are dead anyway. So along with a browser you should get burned in security for the major vendors. Security that does not rely on anyone that can lie to you.
I guess they shouldnt have said so many uncharitable things about the NSA after 9-11.
rats, wrong thread
It only serves to destroy what really matters to you.
I doubt that another judge will agree to hear any appeals on the case. I think they mostly cover for each other when being accused of bias, less they be accused themselves down the line.
The case might be appealed on other grounds, but not because of some unproven level of bias by the ruling judge. You have to submit evidence that she is biased. She can simply say that using her special prudence powers, she is immune from such petty motivations. God bless America and all that.