Maybe he's reached the end of his usefulness at Google and they just didn't care if he left. I'm not trying to imply anything, I'm just stating one possible scenario.
No shit, can you imagine the 5,000 pages of "OMG WTF LOL" they are gonna get off the average teenagers phone within the first 3 months of this program going? The amount of data generated will be comprehensible and so little of it would be worth anything at all. .
It seems you are confusing the issues, which is pretty disingenuous on it's own. You don't have to have faith you're chair won't collapse when it is pretty demonstrable in an of itself. Having faith in something that is easily provable is pretty contrary to the whole concept of faith in the religious sense. The faith required by religious doctrine is supposed to be proof in the face of an insurmountable lack of evidence. Simply redefining the term to meet your argument is a matter of semantics which is a sidetrack from the actual argument. You claim many many things point to gods existence, but you can you can you actually provide a real example? If so then why bother with faith? You're argument gets really circular really quick.
You have a basic fallacy in your argument. Anyone that even hints at giving any validity to ID at all truly understands NOTHING about theory or science. Simply accepting evolution puts you light years ahead of any purveyor or creationist myth no matter how you package it.
This still seems like a bit of a strawman argument. Instead of attacking the validity of whether the teaching of evolution as fact is mandatory, you worry whether the state can shift with science. I'd rather get the religious and creationist idiocy out of scientific education first then worry about changing the specifics.
There is a difference between knowledge and faith. Faith is based on a supposition with no evidence or manufactured evidence. It seems you're using a bit of hyperbole when you say:
most "Evolutionists" are not scientists at all and they are close minded and acting on faith
Aside from that "Experts" are actual tangible physical people that can be proved to exist, unlike any of god.
If someone proposes a better theory, it will be tested and if it meet the bar it will be followed. It's not like evolutionists are closed minded idiots acting on faith, they're scientists and act based on verifiable evidence. I think you have evolutionists confused with the ID crowd.
Way to come out and fight for your cause AC. If in fact, the claim of
A personal computer may be a desktop computer or a laptop, tablet, or a handheld PC.
Then the numbers are still in my favor.
Skate to where the puck will be not where it is.
No one was arguing about the future numbers, we're talking about the present and with roughly 41% of all computational devices running a windows base OS, then obviously the claim of apple dominance of the market patently false. If you're only defense is to resort to personal attack and hurt feelings then I'm obviously not the one with a problem here.
Apple sells overpriced shiny garbage manufactured by slave labor so of course they have a higher profit margin, but that has nothing to do with market share. So while you may have pretty pictures, you obviously are lacking a coherent argument. Good day sir.
MS hegemony on personal computers would continue unabated.
It pretty much has. Microsoft still has a considerable margin of the market share in the personal computer arena. Tablets are not personal computers, they are tablets, and if you really want to compare mobile devices, well I have bad news for you there too.
I agree with you 100%, and I will continue to try to get someone else elected. For now though, they are still assholes and are most of the rural residents of the state that keep re-electing these guys.
Money is only worth something if you can spend it freely. I may be a bitcoin billionaire, but it's not gonna do be a bit of good unless my bank accepts them or I can get a reasonable exchange rate for actual currency.
It would be great if I could get my congressmen to do something like this, or even support something like this, but they are so far up the ass of their corporate masters they can brush the CEO's teeth without him ever opening his mouth.
Slashdot Mirror
I think it would be more akin to someone smearing shit on your clean windshield.
Maybe he's reached the end of his usefulness at Google and they just didn't care if he left. I'm not trying to imply anything, I'm just stating one possible scenario.
navigating may be easy, but storing it will be the real issue.
Ever heard of bureaucratic inefficiency?
No shit, can you imagine the 5,000 pages of "OMG WTF LOL" they are gonna get off the average teenagers phone within the first 3 months of this program going? The amount of data generated will be comprehensible and so little of it would be worth anything at all. .
Don't forget about all of those people on the fields of justice.
It seems you are confusing the issues, which is pretty disingenuous on it's own. You don't have to have faith you're chair won't collapse when it is pretty demonstrable in an of itself. Having faith in something that is easily provable is pretty contrary to the whole concept of faith in the religious sense. The faith required by religious doctrine is supposed to be proof in the face of an insurmountable lack of evidence. Simply redefining the term to meet your argument is a matter of semantics which is a sidetrack from the actual argument. You claim many many things point to gods existence, but you can you can you actually provide a real example? If so then why bother with faith? You're argument gets really circular really quick.
You have a basic fallacy in your argument. Anyone that even hints at giving any validity to ID at all truly understands NOTHING about theory or science. Simply accepting evolution puts you light years ahead of any purveyor or creationist myth no matter how you package it.
This still seems like a bit of a strawman argument. Instead of attacking the validity of whether the teaching of evolution as fact is mandatory, you worry whether the state can shift with science. I'd rather get the religious and creationist idiocy out of scientific education first then worry about changing the specifics.
most "Evolutionists" are not scientists at all and they are close minded and acting on faith
Aside from that "Experts" are actual tangible physical people that can be proved to exist, unlike any of god.
Only the major ones. Sam Adams, Firestone, Sockeye, Uinta, and Pike's all make excellent beers.
If someone proposes a better theory, it will be tested and if it meet the bar it will be followed. It's not like evolutionists are closed minded idiots acting on faith, they're scientists and act based on verifiable evidence. I think you have evolutionists confused with the ID crowd.
A personal computer may be a desktop computer or a laptop, tablet, or a handheld PC.
Then the numbers are still in my favor.
Skate to where the puck will be not where it is.
No one was arguing about the future numbers, we're talking about the present and with roughly 41% of all computational devices running a windows base OS, then obviously the claim of apple dominance of the market patently false. If you're only defense is to resort to personal attack and hurt feelings then I'm obviously not the one with a problem here.
Apple sells overpriced shiny garbage manufactured by slave labor so of course they have a higher profit margin, but that has nothing to do with market share. So while you may have pretty pictures, you obviously are lacking a coherent argument. Good day sir.
Still not enough!
MS hegemony on personal computers would continue unabated.
It pretty much has. Microsoft still has a considerable margin of the market share in the personal computer arena. Tablets are not personal computers, they are tablets, and if you really want to compare mobile devices, well I have bad news for you there too.
nope.
Good point, time to start mining for fake money!
I agree with you 100%, and I will continue to try to get someone else elected. For now though, they are still assholes and are most of the rural residents of the state that keep re-electing these guys.
This won't even make it out of committee unfortunately.
Because I've watched their votes and they are never in the interest of the people they represent. (pro SOPA and PIPA, Anti-net neutrality)
Because they have closed door sessions with lobbyists that support issues not relevant to my state.
Because they are mostly anti-tax, tea-bagger, jag-offs.
Are you a congressman or something, why the personal attack?
Money is only worth something if you can spend it freely. I may be a bitcoin billionaire, but it's not gonna do be a bit of good unless my bank accepts them or I can get a reasonable exchange rate for actual currency.
It would be great if I could get my congressmen to do something like this, or even support something like this, but they are so far up the ass of their corporate masters they can brush the CEO's teeth without him ever opening his mouth.
I lol'd at this Kudos to you sir.
Terrible ingredients, Terrible pizza: Papa John's