That explains why my boss suddenly wanted his Oculus headset back yesterday after asking me a couple of days ago to spend 2 weeks evaluating it with the R&D team for ideas.
Are you serious? Xforms has been a standard since 2003, and almost no software supports it, and no organization uses it. This is a pretty clear sign that it is dead, and not worth supporting. XFA is at least supported by one software package that is widely used in business, and used by Government agencies worldwide, among others. And while it is "proprietary" in that one company controls the specification, it is hardly a secret.
No. The way it usually works is there is a touch sensor on the back of the door handle, and the combination of key proximity and a touch of the door handle unlocks the car. Some have an option to unlock and open the trunk automatically when you are standing next to the trunk for a few seconds, in case you have your hands full.
So, what, it just continuously broadcasts "you can start now", with no intermediate encryption or anything?
No, there's encryption between the key and the car. The signal is coming from the original key in realtime, tunnelled over another channel. It is not a record and playback later type of attack. This attack is putting a range extender in the middle so the car thinks the original key is nearby, and unlocks and allows the engine to start.
And Carls Jr ends up bankrupt, because it turns out machines are more efficient than humans at almost everything. But unfortunately one of the things they are not more efficient at is customer retention, when Suzie's friends and their Facebook networks, and if the story goes viral making it to sites like Slashdot, a much wider range of clientele, stop going there because of what happened to Suzie.
The problem with this "great equalization" is that in the high income countries, it is not the top earners who are being equalized, but the middle class. In fact the top earners just keep pulling away from the rest of us - and this is happening globally (some of the worlds richest people are now in India and China, while significant portions of their countries' populations are being left at the starting posts). Globally it may look like a "great equalization", but in every individual country, the gap between rich and poor is growing rapidly. The difference is only in whether the middle class is shrinking and becoming poorer (Western countries), or the middle class is growing and becoming richer (developing countries).
Did you bother reading the article? Netflix has bought the rights to display certain content in the USA. Other companies have bought the rights for other locations.
Except in most cases they haven't. The content creator just wants to keep the option open of selling a higher cost exclusive license in those territories in 6 months, a year, 2 years or some indeterminate time in the future. Because that is how things worked in the 1960's when programs were shipped around on physical tapes with a relatively high reproduction cost, so territories took turns showing them.
i thought music was on the way to getting this right, but...its not. you cant quite get everything on one music service, and video is way behind music in getting it right.
There are a few services within the music industry that have managed to negotiate almost global rights - iTunes and Spotify are almost there, for example. You'd think that this would make the industry as a whole loosen up a bit and open the floodgates for the rest, but for example 8tracks recently went US and Canada only in their bid to go legit. This despite having many mixes of foreign music hosted there where no US/Canada rights holder exists.
Indeed. I really don't get how denying access to content which users are willingly paying you for because of where they are physically located is a "simple fairness thing". Unless by fairness you mean that driving those people to download from free piracy sites instead is fair.
They can apply for the patents before they open source the code to avoid the prior art issue. But if they open source the code without stating up front that you need a license from them, and if they contribute it willingly to other projects with licenses that are incompatible with stating that you need a license to use the code, then they have triggered estoppal.
A lot of OSS licenses make it explicit, but estoppal still exists in law, even if the license doesn't specifically say they can't start suing people for patent infringement on code that they made publicly available under a license that encourages reuse.
People in general (not just developers) approach the subject of AI and automation with far too much fear. In most cases, automation leads to increased productivity (which can have a side effect of increased salary, depending on the greed level of your employer and their shareholders), and a reduction in the mundane tasks, leaving more time to spend on the more interesting tasks. Complete redundancy is a much less frequent outcome.
This, and if we start making any significant difference by any scheme to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, I can see it quickly becoming a dependence, where we need to take ever increasing amounts out to keep our junky planet from slipping into decline, and the further it goes, the harder the withdrawal symptoms will get.
As I said, tread carefully. Adblockers to counter malware and obtrusive advertising are one thing, but not all ad blocker authors have your best interests at heart ("Acceptable Ads" anyone?).
Newsflash: people who write ad-ons that do not respect the rights of publishers most likely have no respect for your rights either. If you still want alternatives, tread carefully.
The default in Apache is not to have an https server set up at all. The instructions I followed 3 years ago for enabling it had SSLv2 and SSLv3 disabled (I just checked my config, and it was already disabled), so maybe these third of all websites are following some guys blog instead of the vendors documentation.
"Consumers should be driving the market" is exactly why we need net neutrality. Without it, mega-corporations are the only ones with deep enough pockets to be driving the market.
If they were Japanese, I'd describe it as mojibake, and they'd know exactly what I meant. I'm not sure that English has the right words to describe it though. I propose âoeSlashnicodeâ.
I think the problem is that surveys always return an unusually high number of responses by 104 year old female construction workers from Kazakhstan holding PhDs, so researchers have come to think that it is normal to get so many responses from that group.
Slashdot Mirror
That explains why my boss suddenly wanted his Oculus headset back yesterday after asking me a couple of days ago to spend 2 weeks evaluating it with the R&D team for ideas.
Are you serious? Xforms has been a standard since 2003, and almost no software supports it, and no organization uses it. This is a pretty clear sign that it is dead, and not worth supporting. XFA is at least supported by one software package that is widely used in business, and used by Government agencies worldwide, among others. And while it is "proprietary" in that one company controls the specification, it is hardly a secret.
No. The way it usually works is there is a touch sensor on the back of the door handle, and the combination of key proximity and a touch of the door handle unlocks the car. Some have an option to unlock and open the trunk automatically when you are standing next to the trunk for a few seconds, in case you have your hands full.
No, there's encryption between the key and the car. The signal is coming from the original key in realtime, tunnelled over another channel. It is not a record and playback later type of attack. This attack is putting a range extender in the middle so the car thinks the original key is nearby, and unlocks and allows the engine to start.
And Carls Jr ends up bankrupt, because it turns out machines are more efficient than humans at almost everything. But unfortunately one of the things they are not more efficient at is customer retention, when Suzie's friends and their Facebook networks, and if the story goes viral making it to sites like Slashdot, a much wider range of clientele, stop going there because of what happened to Suzie.
The problem with this "great equalization" is that in the high income countries, it is not the top earners who are being equalized, but the middle class. In fact the top earners just keep pulling away from the rest of us - and this is happening globally (some of the worlds richest people are now in India and China, while significant portions of their countries' populations are being left at the starting posts). Globally it may look like a "great equalization", but in every individual country, the gap between rich and poor is growing rapidly. The difference is only in whether the middle class is shrinking and becoming poorer (Western countries), or the middle class is growing and becoming richer (developing countries).
Except in most cases they haven't. The content creator just wants to keep the option open of selling a higher cost exclusive license in those territories in 6 months, a year, 2 years or some indeterminate time in the future. Because that is how things worked in the 1960's when programs were shipped around on physical tapes with a relatively high reproduction cost, so territories took turns showing them.
There are a few services within the music industry that have managed to negotiate almost global rights - iTunes and Spotify are almost there, for example. You'd think that this would make the industry as a whole loosen up a bit and open the floodgates for the rest, but for example 8tracks recently went US and Canada only in their bid to go legit. This despite having many mixes of foreign music hosted there where no US/Canada rights holder exists.
Indeed. I really don't get how denying access to content which users are willingly paying you for because of where they are physically located is a "simple fairness thing". Unless by fairness you mean that driving those people to download from free piracy sites instead is fair.
So... his supporters actually like the fact that he has already established that his actions don't match his words?
Probably the best ammunition against Trump is the fact that Putin likes him.
They can apply for the patents before they open source the code to avoid the prior art issue. But if they open source the code without stating up front that you need a license from them, and if they contribute it willingly to other projects with licenses that are incompatible with stating that you need a license to use the code, then they have triggered estoppal.
A lot of OSS licenses make it explicit, but estoppal still exists in law, even if the license doesn't specifically say they can't start suing people for patent infringement on code that they made publicly available under a license that encourages reuse.
People in general (not just developers) approach the subject of AI and automation with far too much fear. In most cases, automation leads to increased productivity (which can have a side effect of increased salary, depending on the greed level of your employer and their shareholders), and a reduction in the mundane tasks, leaving more time to spend on the more interesting tasks. Complete redundancy is a much less frequent outcome.
"Never" being any period of time > 10 minutes for the latest smartphone entitlement generation.
This, and if we start making any significant difference by any scheme to remove CO2 from the atmosphere, I can see it quickly becoming a dependence, where we need to take ever increasing amounts out to keep our junky planet from slipping into decline, and the further it goes, the harder the withdrawal symptoms will get.
As I said, tread carefully. Adblockers to counter malware and obtrusive advertising are one thing, but not all ad blocker authors have your best interests at heart ("Acceptable Ads" anyone?).
Newsflash: people who write ad-ons that do not respect the rights of publishers most likely have no respect for your rights either. If you still want alternatives, tread carefully.
You are looking at the documentation for Apache 2.4, which does not even support SSLv2.
The default in Apache is not to have an https server set up at all. The instructions I followed 3 years ago for enabling it had SSLv2 and SSLv3 disabled (I just checked my config, and it was already disabled), so maybe these third of all websites are following some guys blog instead of the vendors documentation.
Its an excuse. A couple of soldiers went rogue and shot up a Palestinian refugee camp, and the IDF needs a cover story.
"Consumers should be driving the market" is exactly why we need net neutrality. Without it, mega-corporations are the only ones with deep enough pockets to be driving the market.
If you have a way to instantly shut down a nuclear reactor, then why didn't you speak up 5 years ago?
If they were Japanese, I'd describe it as mojibake, and they'd know exactly what I meant. I'm not sure that English has the right words to describe it though. I propose âoeSlashnicodeâ.
I think the problem is that surveys always return an unusually high number of responses by 104 year old female construction workers from Kazakhstan holding PhDs, so researchers have come to think that it is normal to get so many responses from that group.