Wasn't it the government that came out and said it was A-OK to jailbreak your iphone, despite the fact that this goes against the TOS?
Typical double standanrd government.
That's like asking the school bully not to beat you up and take your lunch money.
He does it every day, he's going to do it every day, and now it's your turn.
The only thing that surprises me is that someone seriously came out with a study prior to this one saying the soil was A-OK after what happened.
You'd have to be pretty dense to believe that.
"The only problem may be that the sauce may come out a little too easily on to their food.""
I love how this is shoved at the bottom, like it's some minor problem. I highly doubt this stuff is safe to ingest, please keep it out of my containers |:
Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?
That's a terrible comparison, hotels give you your own private room. I'd rather not be stuck in a plastic tube 30,000 feet in the air with a bunch of wankers.
From a business point of view, especially so if they generate their funds through ads, why cut your userbase? Your ads are just going to be seen even less.
I don't see the article mentioning a refund, I'm hoping this wasn't just a huge ploy from the start to take their money.
Booths at these kinds of things usually aren't cheap...
What they complain about almost as much is that after they notify a service provider of an infringing song or movie clip and they're removed, new copies appear almost immediately.
That tends to be how things work with humans. You tell them no, and instantly people do everything in their power to do it anyway, even if they had no interest before.
Turn off the damn instant search BS by default.
I have yet to meet a single person who thinks it's a good idea.
From the common man's eyes, it slows down and lags as you try to type
From the eyes of nerds, it's a huge waste of bandwidth. I don't need to search s through slashdo, I just wanted to search slashdot.
Do I have to start paying $1 for every 100 searches I do over 1000 a month?
Not to mention with that horribly awful instant search BS they keep pushing, I can only imagine how much crap like that would hit people's wallets.
Slashdot Mirror
Wasn't it the government that came out and said it was A-OK to jailbreak your iphone, despite the fact that this goes against the TOS?
Typical double standanrd government.
Please, Hollywood, don't spoil Doctor Who.
That's like asking the school bully not to beat you up and take your lunch money.
He does it every day, he's going to do it every day, and now it's your turn.
As is assumed, I was merely commenting that TFA mentioned a prior article that goes against these findings.
The only thing that surprises me is that someone seriously came out with a study prior to this one saying the soil was A-OK after what happened.
You'd have to be pretty dense to believe that.
Say it ain't so!
/sarcasm
Especially organ donation.
"The only problem may be that the sauce may come out a little too easily on to their food.""
I love how this is shoved at the bottom, like it's some minor problem. I highly doubt this stuff is safe to ingest, please keep it out of my containers |:
...next time we hear about this, it'll be a news story on how terribly this actually works.
I seriously can not see this ending well.
I'm still on 6, what happened to 7?
I can only imagine how pissed off add-on developers are with this batshit insane update schedule.
Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?
That's a terrible comparison, hotels give you your own private room.
I'd rather not be stuck in a plastic tube 30,000 feet in the air with a bunch of wankers.
From a business point of view, especially so if they generate their funds through ads, why cut your userbase? Your ads are just going to be seen even less.
they decided to book and pay for a booth
I don't see the article mentioning a refund, I'm hoping this wasn't just a huge ploy from the start to take their money.
Booths at these kinds of things usually aren't cheap...
Beats me, but it's still a possibility. Perhaps to them it was just a job?
Where the 2 FAA guys actually interested, or were they along the lines of "Can I go home now?"
What they complain about almost as much is that after they notify a service provider of an infringing song or movie clip and they're removed, new copies appear almost immediately.
That tends to be how things work with humans. You tell them no, and instantly people do everything in their power to do it anyway, even if they had no interest before.
This is a video poking fun at VMware, thought I'd share.
Turn off the damn instant search BS by default.
I have yet to meet a single person who thinks it's a good idea.
From the common man's eyes, it slows down and lags as you try to type
From the eyes of nerds, it's a huge waste of bandwidth. I don't need to search s through slashdo, I just wanted to search slashdot.
Apple sues Mother Nature for making a fruit with the same name.
Haha, my mistake, I misunderstood which piece he didn't believe.
If you look up a few comments, someone posted a link to google announcing the prices.
Do I have to start paying $1 for every 100 searches I do over 1000 a month?
Not to mention with that horribly awful instant search BS they keep pushing, I can only imagine how much crap like that would hit people's wallets.
And I'm going to force all my friends who use skype to come with me.
Ever since Skype started emulating Facebook, I've just hated it.
Most anti-virus programs behave like viruses themselves.
What the hell is up with the ' there?
As for what I'm doing, http://www.collegehumor.com/article/6635487/halloween-then-and-now is about right.
I'll admit I've never watched more than a handful of episodes of Seinfeld. Thanks for clearing that up, though!