Slashdot Mirror


Airline to Offer In-Flight Adult Movies

Soon the loud passenger who's had too much to drink on your red-eye flight will be the least of your travel worries. Ryanair Airlines chief Michael O'Leary plans to launch an app that will allow passengers to watch porn on their tablets and smartphones during flight. Mr O'Leary told the Sun: "I'm not talking about having it on screens on the back of seats for everyone to see. It would be on handheld devices. Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?" Best of all, the app could also be used to gamble or play games in case you got bored during the speaking parts of your in-flight adult movie.

200 comments

  1. Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on SNL? by elrous0 · · Score: 2

    You know, the one from the early 90's with a bunch of guys sitting around talking. David Spade says "I knew I should wear a condom...but I figured, hey, when was I ever going to be in Guam again?" Phil Hartman says "I know the guy is coming out of prison, but he says he wants to turn his life around, so Sheila and I are going to give him a place to stay." Bob Odenkirk says "I know it's over, but I'm going to tell my wife about that affair", and so on...

    Anyone remember that skit?

    --
    SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
  2. Next up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warm tube socks in first class.

  3. I doubt it by norriefc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's Ryan Air, O'Leary pull these type of stunts every other month just for the free PR

    1. Re:I doubt it by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Like the Standing-room-only flights

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    2. Re:I doubt it by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      Yep, I immediately figured it was another one of his publicity stunts. The last one was charging differently for fat passengers IIRC.

      They're always entertaining so I don't mind.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    3. Re:I doubt it by Canazza · · Score: 3, Insightful

      He already charges more for disabled passengers
      or "Early boarding" as it's called, since you can't actually book the front-row seats in advance.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    4. Re:I doubt it by Albanach · · Score: 4, Informative

      I suspect you are simply making this up. Ryanair does charge every passenger a fee, I believe it is €0.50 cents to recoup the cost of the services that they provide to disabled passengers. Obviously every other airline does this too, recouping the cost through ticketing charges, though they may not list the charge individually.

      I am not aware of any fees for services to disabled passengers, suspect they would be illegal, and the ryanair website explicitly lists things such as wheelchair assistance as being free of charge.

    5. Re:I doubt it by mjwx · · Score: 1

      Yep, I immediately figured it was another one of his publicity stunts. The last one was charging differently for fat passengers IIRC.

      Air Asia (Malaysia based budget airline) tried this in 2009, it backfired horribly and they spent more on PR to fix the negative publicity.

      Then again, Air Asia has a reputation as a decent budget airline (probably the best budget airline I've flown on, but it's still a budget airline), from what I've heard RyanAir seems to pride itself on being shit.

      --
      Calling someone a "hater" only means you can not rationally rebut their argument.
    6. Re:I doubt it by 0-until-pink · · Score: 1

      ...and Slashdot fell for it. Stop giving O'Leary free advertising. I mean is their even an IT slant to this?

    7. Re:I doubt it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are experimenting with reserving seats on some flights, and there is an expectation it will be rolled out on all flights shortly
      - Someone who was in a reserved seat yesterday.

  4. WCPGW by Taibhsear · · Score: 2

    If there was ever an article that should be tagged "What could possibly go wrong?" it's this one...

    1. Re:WCPGW by TWX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Especially since they're taking out all but one bathroom...

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:WCPGW by Tim+the+Gecko · · Score: 2

      If there was ever an article that should be tagged "What could possibly go wrong?" it's this one...

      And here's what has already gone wrong: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/355394.stm

    3. Re:WCPGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      +1000

      Kid peeping through seats: "Watcha watchin there mista?"

      Mister Bater: "Oh, its a traditional airline film, The Mile High Club."

      Kid: "But I've been watching through the seats for the last 20 minutes. Who is 'high' in the club?"

      MB: "The woman. Are you sure you should be watching this right now?"

      Kid: "Are you sure *you* should be right now?"

    4. Re:WCPGW by sconeu · · Score: 1

      And making it a pay toilet, to boot.

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
    5. Re:WCPGW by impaledsunset · · Score: 1

      Come on, there are worse things to spill on the cabin floor. It's one of the more benign liquid explosives.

    6. Re:WCPGW by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Especially since they're taking out all but one bathroom...

      Don't worry, If one toilet per aircraft didn't persuade Boeing to put it's corporate foot down, installing tissue dispensers in every setback will. Besides, Ryanair staff are already making it clear that if this goes ahead O'Leary can clean the seats himself.

    7. Re:WCPGW by Froggie · · Score: 1

      Imagine the coin slot size if it's going to take goats.

    8. Re:WCPGW by neonKow · · Score: 1

      What now?

  5. Oh great by al0ha · · Score: 1

    Now not only do I have to worry about being seated next to a crying baby, but also if I'll get seated next to a jerk-off. Sounds like a great idea. (rolls eyes)

    --
    Did you ever wake up in the morning, with a Zombie Woof behind your eyes? -- FZ
    1. Re:Oh great by isorox · · Score: 1

      Now not only do I have to worry about being seated next to a crying baby, but also if I'll get seated next to a jerk-off. Sounds like a great idea. (rolls eyes)

      Why would you fly ryanair?

      I spend a fair bit of time in the air, about 24 hours a month, and I'd never consider flying on that bus.

    2. Re:Oh great by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could be worse; you could be seated between the two.

    3. Re:Oh great by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Now not only do I have to worry about being seated next to a crying baby, but also if I'll get seated next to a jerk-off. Sounds like a great idea. (rolls eyes)

      Why would you fly ryanair?

      I spend a fair bit of time in the air, about 24 hours a month, and I'd never consider flying on that bus.

      Er, it does cheap flights. All airlines are shit, flying is an almost entirely horrible experience anyway, and paying twice as much to get a free plate of crap food and an unwatchable film makes little difference at least on short flights.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Oh great by isorox · · Score: 1

      Er, it does cheap flights. All airlines are shit, flying is an almost entirely horrible experience anyway, and paying twice as much to get a free plate of crap food and an unwatchable film makes little difference at least on short flights.

      Sometimes it's cheap, sometimes not. I have no problem with flying, although I admit I don't fly short-haul a lot, only about 10 flights this year, however I'd much rather spend the extra few quid to have a comfortable flight.

      That means, amongst other things
      1) Flying from my local airport
      2) Flying at a decent time
      3) Having somewhere comfortable to wait for the plane (especially when there are delays)
      4) Having cancelled flights lead to decent treatment (Hotel, rerouting, etc)
      5) The ability to be disorganised (not have to print out boarding passes etc)

      I suppose it depends what you value. If saving £20 on a 2 hour flight is that important, by all means, fly on the scratchcard express, just don't complain about the (literal) wankers you're travelling with.

  6. This is not a good advertisement by javakah · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm really not sure that I want to be flying on an airline whose chief can't tell the difference between a private hotel room and an airplane with dozens of other people sitting right next to you.

    1. Re:This is not a good advertisement by CastrTroy · · Score: 1

      Actually, if people have their own tablets and phones, what's stopping them from taking their own adult films on board. A plane is not the proper place to be watching a porn movie. That movie could easily be seen by the person beside you, behind you, or just someone walking down the aisle.

      --

      Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    2. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I dunno, perhaps he does know the difference and plans on offering individual compartments?

    3. Re:This is not a good advertisement by nepka · · Score: 4, Insightful

      But action movies with violence, blood, heavy drug use and other such things are much more better than watching someone making love?

    4. Re:This is not a good advertisement by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      Which is why many air port magazine stands have more porn on them than the local "alternative lifestyle" book/coffee/music/clothing store?

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    5. Re:This is not a good advertisement by swb · · Score: 3, Insightful

      What was the last porn movie you saw where they made love?

      The last one I saw involved a girl taking two gents at one time and both of them gave her a facial.

      While I'm sure it's a lovely experience, I don't think that's exactly what people think of.

    6. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First off, you absolutely cannot in any way describe the sex scenes in porn as "making love". Second, the major US airlines all show censored versions of R rated movies.

    7. Re:This is not a good advertisement by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      True. I remember reading on slashdot about a guy being seated next to some dude who was watching hentai with the volume cranked up on his iPod Touch...

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    8. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Those are Airports, places you have to wait in for hours for your aircraft. There's plenty of private places you can be to whack off to said mags before you fly off.
      Not only that, but buying it at an airport you're never going to be at again means that some of the shame of meeting someone who KNOWS you bought porn is minimal. That's why 'Lads Mags' have taken off in the UK atleast, there's less of a Stigma in buying Nuts than buying "Dirty MILF Whores Monthly".
      We're a strange race sometimes, but there you go.

      Frankly I look down at anyone who buys porn. They just don't know how to turn off safe search.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    9. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Canazza · · Score: 1

      Not from the airline that planned to make some areas Standing-room only in order to get more passengers on.

      --
      It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
    10. Re:This is not a good advertisement by SirGarlon · · Score: 1

      But action movies with violence, blood, heavy drug use and other such things are much more better than watching someone making love?

      Those are also inappropriate to watch in public. Not everyone wants to see "Texas Chainsaw Massacre," including, very possibly, ME in the next seat. Thanks.

      --
      [Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
    11. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Dcnjoe60 · · Score: 1

      Actually, if people have their own tablets and phones, what's stopping them from taking their own adult films on board. A plane is not the proper place to be watching a porn movie. That movie could easily be seen by the person beside you, behind you, or just someone walking down the aisle.

      Airlines can't profit from it if you bring it yourself. They want to distribute and sell the porn.

    12. Re:This is not a good advertisement by icebraining · · Score: 5, Funny

      You're watching the wrong kind of porn. There is actually "nice" porn. Although I've never seen a man in it.

    13. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Dark+Lord+of+Ohio · · Score: 1

      But action movies with violence, blood, heavy drug use and other such things are much more better than watching someone making love?

      making love... LOL, are we making love, asked porn actress before she started to gurgle with her deeeeeeep throat and after she has been DPd :)

    14. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...A plane is not the proper place to be watching a porn movie. That movie could easily be seen by the person beside you, behind you, or just someone walking down the aisle.

      Yes, you're right. I'd much rather listen to the music and lyrics being played way too loudly from the earbuds of the child sitting next to me...lyrics that would put porn to shame. Yes, indeed...

    15. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, but YOU are the problem, because you are so indecent to stare at other people's screen. Just stop that shameful and rude behavior and you shall never need to see movies you don't want to see.

      Yes, I'm serious. It's YOU, and not the other person. Get that.

    16. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You fell for it, stupid. They never planned that because it won't fly (haha) with regulations. They just claimed to be thinking about this, but of course it was only a PR stunt. Like this one.

    17. Re:This is not a good advertisement by mevets · · Score: 2

      Not that long ago - the 80s - it wasn't rare to see people oogling playboy/penthouse/hustler on trains and busses. Uncouth, yes, but not that uncommon.

      I'm keen on what the new ryan air slogans will be:
      Come and Fly with us?

    18. Re:This is not a good advertisement by stjobe · · Score: 1

      I'm keen on what the new ryan air slogans will be:
      Come and Fly with us?

      "Fly and Come with us"

      --
      "Total destruction the only solution" - Bob Marley
    19. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do you mean gay porn? eww

    20. Re:This is not a good advertisement by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      I've seen "nice" porn, made for women by some woman director. It was really, really boring. Which is why "wrong" is subjective, I guess.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    21. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The difference is most people don't masturbate to action movies.

    22. Re:This is not a good advertisement by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I'd agree that's part of the appeal of lesbian scenes - they tend to not be so harsh. Some straight scenes exist in this category, but they're harder (pun intended) to find.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    23. Re:This is not a good advertisement by PNutts · · Score: 1

      I'm really not sure that I want to be flying on an airline whose chief can't tell the difference between a private hotel room and an airplane with dozens of other people sitting right next to you.

      Hey! It's a mistake anyone can make.

      - Paul Reubens

    24. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And I'd still rather watch that then a guy getting disemboweled. Really,... would you prefer to sit next to someone who might bend you over and doggy you or one that going to repeatedly knife you in the back?

    25. Re:This is not a good advertisement by laejoh · · Score: 1

      Ah, bestiality!

    26. Re:This is not a good advertisement by syousef · · Score: 1

      But action movies with violence, blood, heavy drug use and other such things are much more better than watching someone making love?

      Most normal people don't masturbate to violence, blood and heavy drug use. Most people use porn (which is about sex not making love) to masturbate. So you suddenly have the possibility of a slightly intoxicated idiot losing some of his inhibitions and pulling out his todger on the flight.

      Think about it: When is the last time you watched porn in company? Would you feel comfortable doing that with strangers? In a public place? On transport...that's what we're talking about here!

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    27. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      But action movies with violence, blood, heavy drug use and other such things are much more better than watching someone making love?

      No, and you have no right to inflict that on children or disapproving adults either.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    28. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      do you mean gay porn? eww

      If you find girl-on-girl porn disgusting, you must be some weird sort of misogynist.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    29. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      And I'd still rather watch that then a guy getting disemboweled. Really,... would you prefer to sit next to someone who might bend you over and doggy you or one that going to repeatedly knife you in the back?

      Talk about a false dichotomy.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    30. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Sorry, but YOU are the problem, because you are so indecent to stare at other people's screen. Just stop that shameful and rude behavior and you shall never need to see movies you don't want to see.

      Yes, I'm serious. It's YOU, and not the other person. Get that.

      You, sir, are a twat.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    31. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      That's why 'Lads Mags' have taken off in the UK atleast, there's less of a Stigma in buying Nuts than buying "Dirty MILF Whores Monthly".

      You make it sound like Lads Mags have hardcore pr0n in, when in fact you're lucky to see a couple of nipples.. Each to his own, but you can't really compare the two.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    32. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'm keen on what the new ryan air slogans will be: Come and Fly with us?

      "Fly and Come with us"

      Let the come fly with us.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    33. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      True. I remember reading on slashdot about a guy being seated next to some dude who was watching hentai with the volume cranked up on his iPod Touch...

      He should have ordered a bucket of ice and chucked it over the fucker.

      Only paedophiles watch hentai.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    34. Re:This is not a good advertisement by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I dunno, perhaps he does know the difference and plans on offering individual compartments?

      Who knew Michael "King Twat" O'Leary posted on slashdot?

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    35. Re:This is not a good advertisement by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

      I think you're confusing hentai with loli, which is a (disturbingly large) subset of hentai.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    36. Re:This is not a good advertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No one wants to fly with ryanair. Sometime they just offer the most convenient option with regards to times or direct flights, or the price is just so much cheaper that you can't justify not to use them.

    37. Re:This is not a good advertisement by AtomicJake · · Score: 1

      I assure you that you do not want to be flying on Ryanair...

  7. Practical application by j-turkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "I'm not talking about having it on screens on the back of seats for everyone to see. It would be on handheld devices."

    Preferably handheld devices that can be held in one hand.

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Practical application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I was thinking "That's not all that will be hand held if this idea goes forward..."

    2. Re:Practical application by steelfood · · Score: 2

      I wonder if it counts as joining the mile-high club if it's with a hand.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    3. Re:Practical application by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really, no. Preferably not.

    4. Re:Practical application by geekmux · · Score: 1

      "I'm not talking about having it on screens on the back of seats for everyone to see. It would be on handheld devices."

      Preferably handheld devices that can be held in one hand.

      Imagine how well Siri could "assist" with playback...

      "Mommy, why does that man over there keep saying 'rewind' to his phone?"

  8. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by swb · · Score: 1

    "...when was ever going to be in Haiti again?"

    While I'm sure Guam has its own risks, I think at the time the risk of AIDS in Haiti was the "bad idea" behind that particular stunt..

  9. Ryanair is going to need more bathrooms by Karmashock · · Score: 0

    oh... and they can enjoy the bad press when some drunk guy decides to just pleasure himself in the isle.

    This is a stupid idea... whatever money they make from it will be lost many times over by other factors.

    --
    I've decided to stop wasting my time responding to AC trolls/sockpuppets... so if you want a response from me... login.
  10. Skip the movie by coinreturn · · Score: 5, Insightful

    And have the flight attendants give blowjobs instead.

    1. Re:Skip the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a replacement for the free peanuts i can get behind!

    2. Re:Skip the movie by sokoban · · Score: 4, Funny

      They've already thought of that:
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UfIY24BErBE

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 is the magic number.
    3. Re:Skip the movie by CanHasDIY · · Score: 1

      a replacement for the free peanuts i can get behind!

      Or rather, in front of.

      --
      An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    4. Re:Skip the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I assume you mean the male flight attendants?

    5. Re:Skip the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      waiting for a rim shot, but that's just for first class.

    6. Re:Skip the movie by icebraining · · Score: 1

      Sure, whatever floats your boat.

    7. Re:Skip the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Believe it or not he's actually proposed this too. Look up ryanair, blowjobs on YouTube.

    8. Re:Skip the movie by Coppit · · Score: 1

      Dude. Why didn't you warn me NSFW.

    9. Re:Skip the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would that be the return of "Coffee, tea or me?"

  11. They're using... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a particular brand of tablets that won't stand for content like this. Won't their in-flight entertainment application be banned from the store?

    1. Re:They're using... by mabhatter654 · · Score: 1

      iPads play just fine with web apps ti get the NSFW materials. Just most airlines block that stuff from their in-flight Internet.

      Of course, if you watch porn you brought with you now, you tend to get asked to turn it off or leave the plane.

    2. Re:They're using... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd like to see how they enforce you leaving the plane at 30000 feet.

    3. Re:They're using... by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see how they enforce you leaving the plane at 30000 feet.

      The sort of person who is crass enough to try to watch pr0n on a plane probably has such poor impulse control that they'd whip it out while they were still taxiing.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  12. Problems with kink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like to watch girls 'lay eggs' then cluck like chickens. Anybody got a problem with me watching that during the flight? What if I'm eating a hard boiled egg while watching?

    1. Re:Problems with kink? by GameboyRMH · · Score: 3, Funny

      Due to Rule 34 I can't tell if you're joking. But it's pretty funny either way.

      --
      "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
    2. Re:Problems with kink? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      rolled in liver and vinegar for that authentic "extra smelly pussy" aroma?

    3. Re:Problems with kink? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s'okay, unless it's one of those stinky hard boiled eggs. Those are gross.

  13. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Soilworker · · Score: 1

    > handheld devices

  14. Hostile workplace by kodiaktau · · Score: 1

    I am pretty sure any HR department worth its salt will shut this down...can you imagine the lawsuits from flight attendant unions?

    1. Re:Hostile workplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not just that...but what about the concerned parent who's got their 10yr old daughter/son in the middle seat, and some high exec has an inflight porn going on their tablet layed out in front for all to see?

      thats where the big issue is going to come in, not the hostile working environment, but exposure to our children.

    2. Re:Hostile workplace by dmacleod808 · · Score: 1

      You really thing RyanAir flight attendants are unionized?

      --
      There Can Be Only One...
    3. Re:Hostile workplace by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No unions on Ryanair flights - too much hassle too deal with.

      Apparently the employees are happy nonetheless...

    4. Re:Hostile workplace by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 1

      Then keep your 10 yr old daughter in steerage with the rest of us. High execs fly business class or better.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    5. Re:Hostile workplace by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Then keep your 10 yr old daughter in steerage with the rest of us. High execs fly business class or better.

      Yes, because no one in steerage will be watching pr0n either, only the rich, classy guys do that.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    6. Re:Hostile workplace by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      No unions on Ryanair flights - too much hassle too deal with.

      Apparently the employees are happy nonetheless...

      Are they really? Isn't that nice? I'm sure they're tremedously well paid and have fantastic perks too. Plus they all love Mr O'Leary and generally can't think of anything better than being allowed to work for Ryanair.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  15. Wipes are $5 extra by obarthelemy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wouldn't trust those blankets.

    --
    The Cloud - because you don't care if your apps and data are up in the air.
    1. Re:Wipes are $5 extra by geekmux · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't trust those blankets.

      Uh, you have a reason to trust them now?

    2. Re:Wipes are $5 extra by ProzacPatient · · Score: 1

      I'd hate to be the guy who has to clean up the mess after the plane lands.

  16. Really? by ghn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If people do not watch porn on their own mobile devices in public places such as planes, it MUST be because the airline does not offer an APP for that.

  17. YHBT, HAND by pnot · · Score: 2

    O'Leary is a master at using trolling for free publicity (see his previous proposals for standing-room-only flights and charging passengers to use the toilet, which as far as I know have not come to pass). This is just more free advertising for Ryanair.

  18. Two Things to Note by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

    (1) Ryanair are well-known for making their customers jump through ludicrous hoops to get the misleadingly low advertised price (i.e. you won't) and then nickel and dime them every step of the way. If this is for real, it'll be blatantly (and grossly) overpriced to squeeze yet more money out of the customers. Don't waste your time. Oh, and more importantly...

    (2) Michael O'Leary is a well-known attention whore who announces "controversial" ideas like this he knows damn well won't fly^h^h^h go ahead anyway, but will get plenty of attention from the papers in the meantime. It seems to work too, but damned if *I'm* going to dignify the tedious p**** by taking his bullshit seriously.

    --
    "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    1. Re:Two Things to Note by avgjoe62 · · Score: 1

      Ryanair are well-known for making their customers jump through ludicrous hoops to get the misleadingly low advertised price (i.e. you won't) and then nickel and dime them every step of the way

      Explained brilliantly by Fascinating Aida in this video:

      Cheap Flights

      --

      How come Slashdot never gets Slashdotted?

    2. Re:Two Things to Note by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      Ryanair are well-known for making their customers jump through ludicrous hoops to get the misleadingly low advertised price (i.e. you won't)

      It's not that bad. You only have to remember 3 things:

      1.) Print out the boarding pass before you head to the airport.
      2.) Don't buy anything onboard.
      3.) Measure and weigh your luggage before you head to the airport. (the limits are draconian)

      Never had to pay anything more than the advertised fare + tax + a couple bucks for currency conversion / fees (since I don't live in the UK).

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    3. Re:Two Things to Note by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      Never had to pay anything more than the advertised fare + tax + a couple bucks for currency conversion / fees (since I don't live in the UK).

      Well, I don't know where you are, but they're still doing bullshit scams like forcing people to pay via their *own* prepaid debit card to avoid fees. But of course, if you forget to cancel that card after 6 months, they charge you £2.50 a month for inactivity, and another £10 if it goes into the red because of the fee.

      Given that you have to use this card to avoid paying the "additional" card fee, this is an absolutely blatant attempt to set up ludicrous hoops to be jumped through and then scam them anyway if they try jumping through them. No question that Ryanair are operating in even remotely good faith here.

      Anyone know's seen O'Leary being interviewed knows that he clearly isn't disturbed by the fact that people think he's a prick whose attitude towards complainants and customers in general borders on contempt, nor that they dislike Ryanair- so long as they keep on flying with them.

      I suspect his logic is that people like to bitch about shitty service and the like, but when push comes to shove they'll still fly with Ryanair because they're the cheapest, so it's worth getting publicity regardless of whether it's flattering or not.

      Personally, if I know that they're that desparate to shaft me whichever way I turn and find some other way of costing me money even if I do manage to jump through their hoops without a mistake... am I actually getting it cheap?

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
    4. Re:Two Things to Note by kju · · Score: 1

      Well, be careful and you can score some good deals with Ryanair. Sometimes they really offer flights "all fees included" for only a few bucks.

      I flew from Germany to Dublin for only 10 EUR total some while ago, and from Germany to Poland for 5 EUR.

    5. Re:Two Things to Note by Arancaytar · · Score: 1

      If this is for real, it'll be blatantly (and grossly) overpriced to squeeze yet more money out of the customers.

      I can get the "nickle-and-diming" argument when talking about in-flight food, but seriously? It's not exactly essential.

    6. Re:Two Things to Note by zyzko · · Score: 1

      You are right in that yes, it is the price that matters in the group they target. And despite the dodgy fees (they are far from clear but even the big "traditional airlines" do this; last time I booked a flight from lufthansa.com I was required to use PayPal to not have additional "credit card fee" applied to me at checkout...) and these PR stunts their service actually works and they are profitable and you can quite reasonably expect to get you from place a to b at the time they promise to - many cheapo airlines can't meet that; the number of chepo-airlines gone belly up in recent years is quite high.

      Ryanair is good if you know what you are getting into. Yes, they charge for everything and you have zero flexibility and you have to deal with second class airport terminals but it is generally cheap and the specials can be a real bargain. So if you are a student or have a little flexibility in when and to where to fly you can have holiday travelling for cheap with them. It is not a business travellers airline though in any way...

    7. Re:Two Things to Note by Dogtanian · · Score: 1

      I can get the "nickle-and-diming" argument when talking about in-flight food, but seriously? It's not exactly essential.

      The "nickel and diming" bit referred to the bits that you either *have* to pay, but they weasel out of mentioning in the quoted price, or that you have to jump through ludicrous hoops to avoid paying, and then they find some way to shaft you anyway if you manage that.

      --
      "Slashdot - News and Chat Sites Deviant". (Click "homepage" link above for details).
  19. Why not, indeed. by anthroboy · · Score: 1

    Mr O'Leary told the Sun: "Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?"

    Because an airline seat isn't a private hotel room? If I worked at Ryanair, I'd be a little concerned that Mr. O'Leary doesn't seem to understand some of the fundamental distinctions between airplanes and hotel rooms...

  20. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    My thoughts exactly. I had to look at my calendar to confirm it wasn't April 1st. Regardless of people's desire to apparently have limitless access to porn 24/7 and that most people that determined to be looking at smut on a flight can download it to their phones easily enough, I am still trying to fathom that there's a universe and market niche that actually feels compelled to look at porn while in flight, surrounded by hundreds of people. Is the airline also going to hand out tissue packs and "spank screens" so its customers can jerk off in private? If this is the best the CEO can come up with to increase his airline's profile, he needs to be shown the door.

  21. PR Stunt (again) by Manip · · Score: 1

    This is a PR stunt. They don't plan to do this, just want to get people doing about their airline. This is the same airline that "announced" plans to remove seats and have people stand, and charge to use the toilet on short-hall flights. They have no intention of doing this, they just want your attention.

  22. And this is different from my tablet exactly how? by kriston · · Score: 1

    And this is different from my tablet exactly how?

    --

    Kriston

  23. Won't happen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the same airline that claimed they were looking to implement a fee to use the bathroom.

    This, too, is just a publicity stunt for the notorious Ryanair. Thanks for the free Slashvertisement!

  24. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by nepka · · Score: 0

    And what is so bad about adult entertainment? People like to watch hollywood movies during flights too. If some find porn more interesting, so what?

  25. Not going to happen by djonsson · · Score: 1

    Ryan Air does this all the time. The make outrageous annoucements like this, get massive media attention and never follow through. They haven't started charging for the bathrooms, they haven't got rid of the seats to fit more passengers and they won't be offering in-flight porn.

  26. You haven't flown in a long time have you? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember those gorgeous young women in thight uniforms? Well. Good news everyone! They kept them on and retirement age be damned! Some need a zimmer frame to get around. The young ones that is.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      the asian airlines still have them on international flights. Of course, if you were to be so rude as to ask for sexual favors, there also are a couple armed marshals (yes, they know martial arts too) aboard who will give you an attitude adjustment. I once was on a flight where a guy sat next to a woman and did something to make her scream, lets just say the police in chicago are gentler with perps......

    2. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "a couple armed marshals"

      You really believe that propaganda? You will be lucky to have even one marshal on the flight, save multiple. Check the facts and especially compare the number of air marshals against the number of flights.

      It's nothing more than security theater.

    3. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Remember those gorgeous young women in thight uniforms? Well. Good news everyone! They kept them on and retirement age be damned! Some need a zimmer frame to get around. The young ones that is.

      Depends on the airline. The Canadian airline Westjet has some hot girls in tight skirts on their Las Vegas run from Vancouver and I had a tall leggy blond on Lufthansa offer to do "anything" to make my flight more enjoyable. Her mouth was a couple inches from mine when she made that offer but I was travelling with someone back from Europe at the time so I could not take her up on her offer.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    4. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      Remember those gorgeous young women in thight uniforms? Well. Good news everyone! They kept them on and retirement age be damned! Some need a zimmer frame to get around. The young ones that is.

      Depends on the airline. The Canadian airline Westjet has some hot girls in tight skirts on their Las Vegas run from Vancouver and I had a tall leggy blond on Lufthansa offer to do "anything" to make my flight more enjoyable. Her mouth was a couple inches from mine when she made that offer but I was travelling with someone back from Europe at the time so I could not take her up on her offer.

      I think I've seen that pr0n film too.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    5. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by iggymanz · · Score: 1

      You are speaking of the USA? I am not, several asian nations have more than one on international flights. it is not propaganda as I have several times seen them go into action with troublemakers (no, nothing as exciting as hijackings or terrorists) over the years.

    6. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Remember those gorgeous young women in thight uniforms? Well. Good news everyone! They kept them on and retirement age be damned! Some need a zimmer frame to get around. The young ones that is.

      Depends on the airline. The Canadian airline Westjet has some hot girls in tight skirts on their Las Vegas run from Vancouver and I had a tall leggy blond on Lufthansa offer to do "anything" to make my flight more enjoyable. Her mouth was a couple inches from mine when she made that offer but I was travelling with someone back from Europe at the time so I could not take her up on her offer.

      I think I've seen that pr0n film too.

      Cool story bro. I was just sharing my experience on the German airline on a flight back from Frankfurt a couple years back but whatever. Also, Westjet do have some really hot girls working for them and sometimes one can be lucky enough to have them on the flight.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    7. Re:You haven't flown in a long time have you? by cheeks5965 · · Score: 1

      you misspelled "thight", dumbass. spellcheck much? or are you just a turd?

      --
      -- Flame me and I will happily flame you back. Bring it!
  27. Please put your WHAT in the "upright position"? by erroneus · · Score: 2

    This has got to be a new low or high on the list of bad ideas. Are they going to provide extra bathrooms on these flights?

    1. Re:Please put your WHAT in the "upright position"? by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      At the very least, there should be some sort of partition in the plane between areas of porn viewing and the rest, what if someone underage is able to see from the side?

  28. Stop reading the daily mail by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously just stop. Put it down.

  29. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Canazza · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's more that, traditionally, playing pocket billiards is done at home, by your self, or with a very good friend, and not in a cramped tin box sitting next to a stranger.

    also, Aircraft air is stale enough without adding the musty odour of after-sex.

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  30. Trick to raise windows seats prices? by TheTruthIs · · Score: 1

    Maybe it's a trick to raise the prices of the window seats.

  31. Is he kidding? by pgpalmer · · Score: 1

    "I'm not talking about having it on screens on the back of seats for everyone to see."

    This is just a lawsuit waiting to happen. From whom? Take your pick: the flight attendants, the person sitting in the window seat who can't relocate to another seat, the parents of the kids sitting across from the aisle, etc, etc.

    "It would be on handheld devices."

    In case it isn't obvious, a horizontal screen isn't much different than a vertical screen, in terms of viewing angles.

    "Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?"

    A hotel room isn't shared with multiple people whom you don't know.

    There are some comments here that say that this is nothing but advertising for Ryanair. Well, it worked: I didn't know about their existence before now. And if the airline ever comes to Australia I'm going to avoid them, because I don't want to be stuck next to a person watching offensive material on their handheld.

    1. Re:Is he kidding? by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2

      Is he kidding

      Basically, yes. O'Leary periodically says outrageous things about the future of his incredibly awful airline but they rarely materialize. It's about publicity.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    2. Re:Is he kidding? by syousef · · Score: 1

      There are some comments here that say that this is nothing but advertising for Ryanair. Well, it worked: I didn't know about their existence before now. And if the airline ever comes to Australia I'm going to avoid them, because I don't want to be stuck next to a person watching offensive material on their handheld.

      Yeah here in Aus we have QANTAS. So much better, isn't it:(

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
  32. I'm never flying Ryanair, ever by SlappyBastard · · Score: 1

    I wonder if someone has a website of European budget carriers that allow this . . . because I could easily see Vuelling and Czech Air jumping on this. This is important stuff, folks. Otherwise, I'm taking sheets of plastic with me when I travel.

    --
    I scream. You scream. I assume that means we're both acquainted with the problem. We proceed.
  33. Will they be forced to sit in the back? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will they be forced to sit in the back of the plane?

    And here is what happens at libraries that don't have "private booths"

    http://pittsburgh.cbslocal.com/2011/10/25/man-arrested-after-reportedly-watching-porn-on-library-computer/

  34. Yawn by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is Michael O'Leary just drumming up some free PR by proposing something completely outrageous so that it gets mentioned in all the papers. Last time it was suggesting that they'd charge people to go to the toilet.

    That proposal (like this one) will never actually happen.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is also playing on the outrage that some may feel at the idea of sitting next to a passenger who is watching pornography, especially heightened by sex abuse scandals in Ireland and the "public sex act" performed by Irish radio DJ Neil Prendeville on an Aer Lingus flight this month of last year (http://www.examiner.ie/ireland/aer-lingus-to-complain-radio-hosts-sex-act-to-gardai-135321.html). O'Leary is a firm believer that there is no such thing as bad publicity.

    2. Re:Yawn by mayberry42 · · Score: 2

      Don't get too excited. My (Irish) friend told me it already the pay-to-pee scheme has already started happening. Here's some proof. Never underestimate what Michael will do to increase revenues. I would not so easily discount this as just a PR move.

    3. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems like a sex act on an Aer Lingus flight should involve a tongue.

    4. Re:Yawn by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      did you really just cite the daily mail?

    5. Re:Yawn by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

      I am an Irish person, and until recently flew with RA, until they forbid the use of the emergency aisle unless you had paid extra in advance (ie, the seat would go unused if unbooked).

      MOL has been crapping on his customers more recently of late and will start losing even more if he keeps it up. I hope that even the suggestion of this drives people away.

      There's no telling anymore if he cares for anything more than making more money at the expense of his customer base. This could very well happen.

  35. Could make a lot of money by GameboyRMH · · Score: 1

    If they charge per-view, they could make a lot of money on men trying to beat away their cabin-pressure induced in-flight hardon (won't work and would probably be quite painful - it would be exactly like jacking off with a full-bladder-hardon).

    --
    "When information is power, privacy is freedom" - Jah-Wren Ryel
  36. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Riceballsan · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well 2 huge flaws, 1. The intent of porn tends to cause a physical change in male viewers that other passengers would rather not witness. 2. I'm as much against censoring of porn and such as anyone else, but when someone is going to play it in visible view of my 5 year old without my consent, that is where the line has to be drawn.

  37. Yeah yeah by DrXym · · Score: 1

    O'Leary and Ryanair float these stupid ideas every 6 months - charging for toilets, making everyone stand up etc. I guess it's one way to gain free publicity.

  38. Income by afabbro · · Score: 1

    1. Someone sits next to me.

    2. I take their picture with my camera.

    3. I wonder aloud if perhaps I should the picture and video of what they're watching on YouTube.

    4. Profit.

    --
    Advice: on VPS providers
    1. Re:Income by f8l_0e · · Score: 1

      Always, never, forget to check your references.

  39. Just cheap publicity of O'Leary by photonic · · Score: 1

    Ryanair's boss Michael O'Leary is known for this kind of brainfarts. He knows the press will talk about it for days, so it is all free publicity. He gives a rats ass about the image of the company, since its image is that they are cheap. More of his brilliant ideas: paying for toilets, flying without co-pilot and having a flight attended land it in case of trouble and airplanes with standing room only. They run some provoking advertisements too, like giving the finger to their competitors, or giving holiday suggestions for Berlusconi (he finally resigned a few hours ago!).

    --
    karma police: arrest this man, he talks in maths; he buzzes like a fridge, he's like a detuned radio. [radiohead]
  40. Seriously. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I like boobies like the next guy, but if you can't go a flight without needing to watch porn before you get home, something is really wrong with you.

    IG

  41. the worst part is by Eponymous+Hero · · Score: 0

    when the flight is over and you're in line to leave the plane.

    --
    insensitive clod overlords obligatory xkcd car analogy russian reversals whoosh pedant fanbois ftfy in 3...2...1..PROFIT
  42. I think I found a new use for the barf bags by Quila · · Score: 1

    The question is whether you can get the stewardess to take it now.

    And they could sell KY in-flight at $5 for a tiny single-use tube.

  43. best. story. image. ever. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the Gates-as-Borg image can't hold a candle to this.

  44. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Pope · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's RyanAir; this is just a publicity stunt since O'Leary hasn't been in the new recently for stating stupid ideas that'll never happen.

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  45. It's all fun and games until... by inexia · · Score: 0

    Now that is what I call a sticky situation!

  46. Why a app? by wisnoskij · · Score: 1

    And why would you need a app to watch porn on your own tablet/smartphone?

    --
    Troll is not a replacement for I disagree.
  47. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by omnichad · · Score: 1

    Would you say the same if you saw a naked ugly couple going at it right at the front entrance to your favorite store?

  48. Yikes by rainer_d · · Score: 1
    I saw somebody reading a porn-magazine on the train once. He had wrapped it in an exercise-book cover and held it relatively close to his face, so the people next to him couldn't see it. But I doubt they would have appreciated ;-)

    But from where I sat, I could clearly see it. And it wasn't just a Playboy ("....for the interviews"). It was one of those "under the counter"-mags.

    I've no problem with people reading and watching all kinds of (legal) stuff in their own homes, preferably with the blinds shut, but on a train?
    Eek.
    Worst thing, on a train, I can just leave at the next station of go to the next compartment - not so on a plane.
    But I'm sure, RyanAir would love to charge extra for the hand-sanitizer and the disposable toilet-seat covers ....

    --
    Windows 2000 - from the guys who brought us edlin
    1. Re:Yikes by geekoid · · Score: 1

      My wife bought me a playboy subscription. You now why? it has good articles. yes, I like looking at the titties, but some of the interviews were top notch and very honest.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:Yikes by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

      I would agree with you that the "for the articles" thing is not entirely a joke, based on the few issues I've read.
      I think it's part of them being relatively high-class porn.

      --
      I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
  49. Why wouldnt we if hotels do it? by drolli · · Score: 1

    Ahem. Because in the plane there is no hotel room around the person?

    Anybody who thinks its appropriate to watch an adult movie on his tablet while sitting 30cm away from the neighbor can already do that if he downloads the movie before.

  50. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Scaba · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and not in a cramped tin box sitting next to a stranger.

    Speak for yourself.

  51. hand held devices? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What the hell good is it if my hands are busy holding my damned tablet or phone!

  52. Rename The Airline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Bonair!

  53. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by PPH · · Score: 3, Funny

    You haven't taken a Metro Transit bus in Seattle for some time, have you?

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  54. Other way, this would have solved the problem! by SuperKendall · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It should be noted that the RyanAir proposal would actually have eliminated that problem, since he went into a rage when he was PREVENTED from looking at porn...
     

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  55. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by dragonxtc · · Score: 2

    Personally I would just shrug and hop over them and go about my day.

  56. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Canazza · · Score: 3, Informative

    I said traditionally.

    --
    It pays to be obvious, especially if you have a reputation for being subtle.
  57. Seriously? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    So let me get this straight... I have a handheld device that belongs to me, (and therefore already has over 50% of its longterm memory filled with porn), and they're offering a service that lets me download porn in the air? I can do that for free before I get on the plane, so... WTF is the point of this? Want to make people pay, hire a bunch of prostitutes to work as flight attendants, then make it understood that for a fee, anyone can join the mile high club, with a hot, sexy flight attendant... THAT would make some money. Call it WhoreAir. Actually, I think someone already did that...

  58. ...what? by JustAnotherIdiot · · Score: 1

    Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?

    That's a terrible comparison, hotels give you your own private room.
    I'd rather not be stuck in a plastic tube 30,000 feet in the air with a bunch of wankers.

    --
    What do I know, I'm just an idiot, right?
    1. Re:...what? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > That's a terrible comparison, hotels give you your own private room.

      Not to mention hotel porn is censored, utter shite.

      "I have to see the pussy! SHOW ME the pussy!" but all I can see is hairy, bobbing man-ass!

  59. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Riceballsan · · Score: 2

    Kids have ages where they mature, ages where they repeat everything they see whether they are old enough to understand it or not at the location where it is least appropriate. When my son was 3 he heard me mutter ah shit. He didn't repeat it, I thought I was in the clear, until the next time he saw his grandma and repeated it 40 times. Now ready to imagine what the end result would be if say a 2-3 year old were to pull off his diaper and attempt to re-enact something he'd seen at a pre-school. If the parent is lucky the child will just get thrown out of the school, if not DSS can have the power to assume the parent is unfit. All because some other jerk that the parent has no control over, couldn't wait for the plane to land?

  60. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    If some find porn more interesting, so what?

    You really want to be sat next to somebody with an erection for a few hours? What about when they get up and head for the bathroom doing the "I have an erection" walk? Should we really have to watch that?

    Societies have things called 'taboos' for a reason...

    --
    No sig today...
  61. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Joce640k · · Score: 1

    There is no line to be drawn. It is for you to educate your 5 year old about reality.

    Why not hand the kid a reefer to smoke later as part of your "educational program"...?

    --
    No sig today...
  62. The seats are already too small by microbee · · Score: 1

    With the erection it's even worse! We need more space.

  63. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    Why not make an analogy that, I dunno, makes sense?

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  64. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Travelsonic · · Score: 1

    If he doesn't flaunt the erection, none of my business - and why are you watching that part of him while he walks to begin with? [you kinda walked yourself into that one]\\

    --
    If you believe in privacy, and believe you have "nothing to hide" at the same time, you're a goddammed idiot
  65. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

    Would you say the same if you saw a naked ugly couple going at it right at the front entrance to your favorite store?

    Well, yeah... typically the only people that would be distraught
    over that are people that were taught that the naked body is
    shameful and that sex is dirty, etc.

    I wasn't, I guess you were?

    Personally I would just shrug and hop over them and go about my day.

    Lol, that's funny, you're imagining missionary while I was imagining,
    the tree or camel's hump or suspended congress. And why they gotta
    be in your way? Let's talk about this.

    -AI

    --
    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion
  66. Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's no reason for preventing semen in planes.

  67. Redundant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From what I've heard, if you're flying Ryanair, you've already been screwed hard. Porn just seems redundant at that point.

  68. my interpretation by KingAlanI · · Score: 1

    "if she gets pregnant, I'll be long gone" was how I read that

    --
    I listen to both RIAA and non-RIAA stuff if I like the music, tangential business/politics nonwithstanding.
    1. Re:my interpretation by tehcyder · · Score: 1

      "if she gets pregnant, I'll be long gone" was how I read that

      Exactly, if you caught AIDS it wouldn't be relevant that you never went back to X, you'd still have the disease.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  69. Don't bet the farm on this one by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, who the fuck would want to watch a porn movie in a crowded airplane?

  70. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Gospodin · · Score: 1

    When he's got the window seat and you've got the aisle, his business becomes your business.

    --
    ...following the principles of Heisenburger's Uncertain Cat...
  71. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by aristotle-dude · · Score: 3, Funny

    You haven't taken a Metro Transit bus in Seattle for some time, have you?

    Damn those metrosexuals.

    --
    Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
  72. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by dave87656 · · Score: 1

    That was good!

  73. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  74. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by smellotron · · Score: 1

    and why are you watching that part of him while he walks to begin with? [you kinda walked yourself into that one]

    The GP's reason is probably something along the lines of this eyetracking study:

    Although both men and women look at the image of George Brett when directed to find out information about his sport and position, men tend to focus on private anatomy as well as the face.

    Why do men assess genitalia? I don't know, but it is a repeatable phenomenon, so you may as well accept it rather than castigating the GP for "looking".

  75. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

    Class man; class. Even if you get a +5 funny for this it just won't be enough.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  76. Trollalert! by Askmum · · Score: 1

    It would be on handheld devices. Hotels around the world have it, so why wouldn't we?

    Is he deliberately being a troll here? What's the difference between hotelrooms and planes? Maybe the fact that you have privacy in a hotelroom? And how does this match up with the reports of a few weeks ago to remove all toilets?
    Small tip for Mr. O'Leary: put small booths in the plane with a coin slot so you can get some more money from your patrons while they jack themselves off.

  77. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    And what is so bad about adult entertainment? People like to watch hollywood movies during flights too. If some find porn more interesting, so what?

    Sure, and people have to go to the toilet so why not let them do it in their seats as well?

    Some activities should be private. When you watch adult films in a hotel, you do it in your own room, not the fucking restaurant.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  78. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by tehcyder · · Score: 1

    [..] but when someone is going to play it in visible view of my 5 year old without my consent, that is where the line has to be drawn.

    There is no line to be drawn. It is for you to educate your 5 year old about reality. "Peoples watch porn, it is a work fiction that do not reflect reality and certainly do not reflect the puritan value i try to force on you. When you reach puberty you may like to watch porn too, but i will punish you if i find about it." See, that wasn't too hard. IT IS NOT FOR EVERYONE AROUND YOU TO BE CAREFUL BECAUSE YOU WAND YOUR KID AROUND. YOUR KID IS YOUR RESPONSIBILITY.

    You need to post your retarded rant in a releant thread, wankstain.

    --
    To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
  79. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why don't you come round to where I live, start wanking in front of some children, then see how long your body lasts out under the prolonged beating you will receive?.

    OP was talking about wanking to pr0n front of a 5 year old, both of you are disgusting paedophiles with laughably small genitals and the intelligence of soup spoons.

    Posted anonymously, because the retard slashdot paedophile apologists get mod points too.

  80. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by rtfa-troll · · Score: 1

    It's RyanAir; this is just a publicity stunt

    Exactly. This is the same airline that makes new aircraft designs to charge people to go to the toilet (imagine if two people become sick on the same flight!) and/or have standing rather than sitting positions (imagine an evacuation from a plane which will not have been designed for such passenger density) . Their business model is basically that people believe that if the customer service is worse, the flight must be cheaper. They make it quite difficult to compare (they have tickets online for about 10UKP but the price quoted up front never includes baggage or check in (up to 55UKP online + 100UKP at the airport for a standard airline 25kg allowance), for example and in order to get it you have to use their own special card or you will have to pay an additional administration fee.

    Ryanair, having tricked you into paying more than an equivalent standard airline, will then, typically, dump you at some random airport not even close to the airport you were meant to go to and fail to arrange transport to your original destination.

    It sometimes happens that people travel RyanAir because it has a monopoly on a particular route, but it seems to me that it's mostly because they just don't realise how much they are being ripped off. Avoid, or if you do take up with RyanAir, remember that the only form of communication they accept is through the small claims court. Always buy with a credit card and be ready to cancel the charge. Send in your demands for a refund of any additional costs you had to bear (by registered mail; forget the phone), but give a deadline and after they ignore them start with the small claims court. Since the courts know they are a bunch of cheats, if you provide reasonable evidence you will get your money.

    --
    =~ s,(.*),<sarcasm>$1</sarcasm>,g if any_point_you_wish();
  81. Re:And this is different from my tablet exactly ho by RivenAleem · · Score: 1

    That was one of the first things I thought of, I don't need an app to watch adult (or any kind) of movie/TV on my tablet.

  82. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by xaxa · · Score: 1

    Ryanair can be a reasonable option in some circumstances.

    If you're flying to London, then Stansted and Luton are only a little less-connected than Gatwick (5-10 minutes more travelling time, similar cost). In some cities the 'small' airport used by Ryanair can be more convenient -- e.g. Gothenberg City is nearer the centre of Gothenberg.

    I've flown from London to places in Eastern Europe with Ryanair. If the destination only has one airport (e.g. Bratislava) then it shouldn't be a problem -- there will be buses to the centre of town.

    Book the luggage and everything else online, or travel with hand luggage only (weigh it). Remember to include these costs when comparing with other airlines -- but remember easyJet (etc) also charge for luggage and paying by card. I have the appropriate credit card to avoid Ryanair's 'admin' fees (here), I flew to Brno for £14.99 (as advertised, with hand luggage only) + ~£20 for the train to Luton.

    The last few times I've flown with easyJet the flight has been late. They fly to main airports, but they're still cheap and will be last in line for a landing slot and gate if there's congestion. You get what you pay for, after all. I'm beginning to think being reliably on-time but further from the city with Ryanair is better than being late and a little nearer with easyJet.

  83. Morality sinking to a new low by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is porn, other "adult" content, greed the reason the world looks at the USA with disdain?

    All we read-about in international press is how to screw-the poor, and also the porn stars.

  84. please return.... by inerlogic · · Score: 1

    your zipper to it's full upright and locked position, stewardesses will be going up and down the aisles to collect discarded kleenex and un-used lotion bottles....

  85. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by dwarfsoft · · Score: 1

    There was a guy banned from a bus here in Canberra for watching porn on his phone. Mind you, he kept making a deal about it and sitting next to women so that they could see/hear it. Some people will already be doing this on planes, I see no need to enable more people to do it. "Now do I give her the ass, or the crotch" will have a whole new meaning

    --
    Cheers, Chris
  86. Re:Anyone remember that "Bad Idea Jeans" skit on S by AlienIntelligence · · Score: 1

    Why don't you come round to where I live, start wanking in front of some children, then see how long your body lasts out under the prolonged beating you will receive?.

    OP was talking about wanking to pr0n front of a 5 year old, both of you are disgusting paedophiles with laughably small genitals and the intelligence of soup spoons.

    Posted anonymously, because the retard slashdot paedophile apologists get mod points too.

    No, you posted anonymously because you are ashamed of your
    body and YOU ARE probably the pedophile that you keep
    referring to.

    Cause who the fuck brought up wanking in public in front of kids FFS?

    {I} was posting directly to the statement that {I} quoted in my reply.
    AND NOTHING ELSE!
    Do not distort the truth with your illusions.

    -AI

    Furthermore [I suggest against attacking those 'in the field' when
    you are reeking of insecurities]. Anyone with Psych 101 under their
    belt, now also knows you have a small pee pee. [sic] And that you
    are male, since you are describing intimately violent actions that are
    not commonly fantasized by in females. {This is obv aside from the
    forum's purported M/F ratio} We also know that you were abused.
    I'm sorry for that. That is why I got into the field. To help those that are
    preyed on by those that were preyed upon and so on and to break the
    tragic cycle that occurs as as result. To wit... I'm sure you also abuse
    women, now let me justify that. I didn't say physically, cause I presume
    well,... that you are a pussy [since you aren't even able to post under
    the veil of pseudo-anonymity but had to opt for full Anon COWARD].
    But I bet you mentally beat down any woman that gives two craps about
    you any chance you get. Email me, seriously... I do a ton of pro bono,
    you need it. Society needs you to need it. Before you do something
    that can't be undone.

    --
    For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to persist in delusion