Another trick is to look for people with different certifications. Looking for a Cisco guy? Find one who knows languages too. Need a COBOL developer? Pick the one who has worked with Java.
The only thing worse that maintaining an old infrastructure is trying to change to a new one. And frankly, I'm a little annoyed that the government's CIO is one of those "it's old, how passe', not my project" kinds of guys.
That, combined with an inefficient purchasing system. They should be able to call the GPO and say "I need four notebooks with these specifications" and the GPO sends them off and bills the agency appropriately.
Re:It's not just specialization, there is also fea
on
Where's HAL 9000?
·
· Score: 1
It cannot come up with new ways of solving problems. When it gets a question wrong, it won't care, it won't learn from the mistake.
The right way to do it is for your DNS and DHCP server to talk to one another so that when the machine gets a DHCP address it is automagically registered in the internal DNS. That's way simpler than waiting 12 minutes for netbios to sync up, or installing some kind of WINS server.
How in the world does seed "drift" into another person's field? Do you think they are dropping it from airplanes? Seed is expensive, and farmers use fancy machines that put it directly in the ground where they want it. Hint: that's how you get the cute rows of plants.
I'm not a fan of this either, but there is one potential upside: cops will start pulling over people based on some evidence, rather than just pulling over brown people.
There is a difference between collective ownership and private ownership. Government would never have been invented if people were capable of behaving and respecting the common.
That's not what the equal protection clause means. It would only be relevant if the law contained something about the race (or other protected class) of the perpetrator and had different punishments based on that. But it does not. It might even be relevant if it said "you get 10 years for killing a white and 20 years for killing a black", but it doesn't say that either, no matter how hard you try to misconstrue it what way. Equal protection demands that people are treated fairly by the laws no matter who they are.
Also, the punishment meted out to a convicted criminal is not "for" the victim, it is "for" the State. Specifically the people of the jurisdiction. Criminal cases are not "Victim versus Defendant", they are "the People versus Defendant". The victim is not a party to the legal case, except in some cases as a witness. The law does not protect the victims, in a legal sense; rather it protects society from having assholes going around committing crimes. And there is no such thing as "less illegal", as has already been explained.
Not "if you can think of a better reason" but if you HAVE a better reason. The legal versus not legal is only one metric of the justice system. Once someone crosses into the not legal side of things, there are still other thresholds and distinctions as to how serious of a crime something is.
Except it isn't really that fine of a distinction. If I drop an anvil on the ground, no big deal. If I drop an anvil on someone's head accidentally, that's manslaughter. If I drop an anvil on someone's head on purpose, it is murder. Intent counts, and we punish people more severely when their intent is more brazen, destructive or reckless. Violating privacy for the lulz is bad, and doing it with the intent to humiliate is worse.
Slashdot Mirror
Doctor Hackenbush, I presume?
What field is this? To be able to semi-retire by mid-thirties you'd have to be making $250,000-500,000 a year.
That's why you read the article, Brainiac.
The internet was created 6000 years ago
In September of 1993?
Another trick is to look for people with different certifications. Looking for a Cisco guy? Find one who knows languages too. Need a COBOL developer? Pick the one who has worked with Java.
The only thing worse that maintaining an old infrastructure is trying to change to a new one. And frankly, I'm a little annoyed that the government's CIO is one of those "it's old, how passe', not my project" kinds of guys.
That, combined with an inefficient purchasing system. They should be able to call the GPO and say "I need four notebooks with these specifications" and the GPO sends them off and bills the agency appropriately.
It cannot come up with new ways of solving problems. When it gets a question wrong, it won't care, it won't learn from the mistake.
Who is using 57-126?
I think that makes you a third wave geek.
The right way to do it is for your DNS and DHCP server to talk to one another so that when the machine gets a DHCP address it is automagically registered in the internal DNS. That's way simpler than waiting 12 minutes for netbios to sync up, or installing some kind of WINS server.
If you have to remember it, you are doing it wrong.
I eat a lot of chicken, and it hasn't [BOCK BOCK BOCK, scratch, scratch, BU-CAW] affected me. Stupid science.
How in the world does seed "drift" into another person's field? Do you think they are dropping it from airplanes? Seed is expensive, and farmers use fancy machines that put it directly in the ground where they want it. Hint: that's how you get the cute rows of plants.
I'm not a fan of this either, but there is one potential upside: cops will start pulling over people based on some evidence, rather than just pulling over brown people.
There was 100 million less people in the US in 1968 than there is now. There are something like 3 BILLION more people on the planet since then.
There is a difference between collective ownership and private ownership. Government would never have been invented if people were capable of behaving and respecting the common.
That's not what the equal protection clause means. It would only be relevant if the law contained something about the race (or other protected class) of the perpetrator and had different punishments based on that. But it does not. It might even be relevant if it said "you get 10 years for killing a white and 20 years for killing a black", but it doesn't say that either, no matter how hard you try to misconstrue it what way. Equal protection demands that people are treated fairly by the laws no matter who they are.
Also, the punishment meted out to a convicted criminal is not "for" the victim, it is "for" the State. Specifically the people of the jurisdiction. Criminal cases are not "Victim versus Defendant", they are "the People versus Defendant". The victim is not a party to the legal case, except in some cases as a witness. The law does not protect the victims, in a legal sense; rather it protects society from having assholes going around committing crimes. And there is no such thing as "less illegal", as has already been explained.
That's not what the equal protection clause means.
Not "if you can think of a better reason" but if you HAVE a better reason. The legal versus not legal is only one metric of the justice system. Once someone crosses into the not legal side of things, there are still other thresholds and distinctions as to how serious of a crime something is.
Except it isn't really that fine of a distinction. If I drop an anvil on the ground, no big deal. If I drop an anvil on someone's head accidentally, that's manslaughter. If I drop an anvil on someone's head on purpose, it is murder. Intent counts, and we punish people more severely when their intent is more brazen, destructive or reckless. Violating privacy for the lulz is bad, and doing it with the intent to humiliate is worse.
Nobody is punishing the opinion, just acting on it.
Except that isn't what it is at all. For something to be a hate crime, it must be done because the victim is a minority.
And that's not what equal protection of the law means.
Of course that is homophobic! He was afraid of the homosexual.
Exactly right. The guy who filmed and published should take personal responsibility for the damage he caused.