Not to mention the SuperDelegates pledged to Hillary before the election even began!!
That should be illegal. If they were free or were less of them then Bernie would have gotten a chance. He is too liberal for me but I would have voted for him over Trump and so would millions of others and Trump would be whining back home in his towers.
The question is like an alcoholic will Democrats admit there is a problem and change or not?
Corruption SUCKS! The fact that I am now finding out that foreign countries are donating to Clinton scares me as much as the Russians helping Trump. That should be treason and alone for Hillary not to run.
...try to buy a Windows PC that has sufficient PCI-Express lanes to run some NVMe SSD storage on top of a high-end video card and some a few USB 3 and ThunderBolt ports.
Hell, try to BUILD it. The motherboard manufacturers play jenga with individual models and what ports are where, so even though there's a PC Standard it takes hours of research to build a system that doesn't have random bottlenecks if you're going to be doing massive-media manipulation like video editing.
So does the new MacBook tromp most Windows PCs you can buy or build? You betcha it can, that's no surprise at all. Even those with significantly higher spec 'parts' when the underlying motherboard cripples everything so it can't live up to those specs.
- WolfWings
Yawn
That was true with Haswell in what 2013?! The Broadwell E and Skylake-E and maybe even Skylake has plenty of lanes, USB 3, and Thunderbolt/USB type C. As Apple added these so did Intel for the PC. Infact Intel invented it!! No you did not need a $600 workstation grade Xeon chipset either. A regular Skylake has it all and can do exactly what you described. True a junk HP will not, but neither will the cheapest macs either. Any $150 or up Asus or Gigabyte board or Dell Precision Workstation will all of these
The only thing the Apple users have correct in which I give credit is PC screens SUCK! IPS is almost non existent so the colors and gamma do not look the same at different angles and the calibration SUCKS. if you are viewing a screen from a coworker you are seeing something different.
Now there are expensive ok screens for the PC that cost hundreds which I highly recommend for any engineer, salesperson (to show stuff to clients), and video artists. But, none for the laptops.
Actually the MS Surface is IPS and the closest to Mac quality I see.
Windows historically before Windows 7 didn't offer Adobe color monitor profiles either. The WindowsXP lovers drove me nuts over this when they still used Photoshop on their old pcs:-) It also is why the Gimp is no photoshop and Linux is no replacement for Windows/macOSX for these users either.
But, that is it these days. The mac pro in 2013 did have freaking amazing professional graphics cards but you could get that on a workstation class PC. If laptop makers make decent screens then it is all over the Apple lovers out there. The graphics at the mac pro are sooo laughable and 2010 era in performance it makes me wonder why Apple even bothered and just stuck with Intel integrated graphics? They screwed up big time and tried to make the Macbook Pro an iphone. It is not a phone folks! We got the air for these teenagers who do light work and Twitter all day.
Because he is endorsed by God! The Bible states countless times the consequences for immorality and disbelief.
We have transgenders pissing in the bathrooms! That's right?! They might touch your kids and raise your taxes?;
We need a moral man ASAP who is convicted of child molestation to lead this country back to earn God's favor!
Signed your typical redneck voter who is Republican and voted to make sure the next supreme Court judge believes these things which is frightening accurate according to polls
I don't know about the rest of slashdot readers, but from my point of view, Chrome is a great browser for apathetic users who don't have very sophisticated expectations in terms of extensibility and privacy features. With Firefox you have a much richer selection of add-ons and other niceties like, for instance, the ability to synchronize your data to your own server, rather than being entirely dependent on someone's so-called "cloud". Whereas Mozilla remains committed to a decentralized web, Google has managed to progressively blur the lines between browser and web property.
I suppose Chrome is not as horrific as whatever Facebook might come up with if they ever decided to make a browser, but that's not saying much for Chrome. I'm a user of many Google products, but when it comes to browsers I'll be sticking with the content-neutral product that prioritizes my freedom and privacy - Firefox!
Well everyone is different.
To me I want a fast browser that is secure and takes advantage of my hardware and syncs up everything with all platforms. Chrome is it! Both modern IE and Chrome use threading per tab which means under Windows it uses c"\users\%appdata\lowrights. It is sandboxed at the kernel level! It also means my i7 can utilize all my cores with both browsers by MS and Google.
Firefox keeps getting hacked as a result and I do not want to run workarounds for this architectural limit with sandboxie. I just want something to work and have no radical changes.
When I need more functionality I use an app. If I want a browser I pick Chrome. Firefox lost me at 4.0. Remember that release? AWFULL. Worse was the versions that kept breaking everything. I just wanted one version for 2 years. IE 9 came out which no longer required hacks and had full hardware acceleration and smooth scrool. I was hooked in 2011 and started using IE 11 and then Chrome by the end of the year.
Well I haven't used Firefox since except for special occasions and I am reminded each time how a modern browser is so much nicer. The next version of Firefox will be at 2008 level technology soon of Chrome 1.0 and IE 8 with electrosys where I can get a real sandbox and threading and process isolation for security.
Firefox I guess. The good news is with electrosys it has caught up to 2009 IE 8 and Chrome 1.0 in terms of security by using lowrights in c:\users\%appdata and threading per process which is nice if you have more than 1 cpu core which is everyone but grandma here in 2016.
But it is too little too late for me personally to use Firefox again, but try it as the newer versions supposed to be caught up.
Eventually I will start to use Edge html 5.1 features, but for now it's too cutting edge and changing and a small percentage.
But users hate it. IE got Ok by version 9 for Joe Six pack and Ok by IE 10 for developers. Not great but it did it's job. Edge gives me subscription errors with AdBlock and crashes when I loaded it. It feels alpha quality and made for phones. Not pcs. IE 11 is still part of 10. I replaced edge and put an IE icon on the taskbar to test things.
X-UA-Compatible Css tag will save us for awhile until IE 11 becomes too out of date. I refuse to test on Edge
Slashdot Mirror
Not to mention the SuperDelegates pledged to Hillary before the election even began!!
That should be illegal. If they were free or were less of them then Bernie would have gotten a chance. He is too liberal for me but I would have voted for him over Trump and so would millions of others and Trump would be whining back home in his towers.
The question is like an alcoholic will Democrats admit there is a problem and change or not?
Corruption SUCKS! The fact that I am now finding out that foreign countries are donating to Clinton scares me as much as the Russians helping Trump. That should be treason and alone for Hillary not to run.
We use IE 8 so should be fine ... sheww
HTMl 5 is too scary right now
Wait ... We can save how much money by eliminating that IT cost center??
...try to buy a Windows PC that has sufficient PCI-Express lanes to run some NVMe SSD storage on top of a high-end video card and some a few USB 3 and ThunderBolt ports.
Hell, try to BUILD it. The motherboard manufacturers play jenga with individual models and what ports are where, so even though there's a PC Standard it takes hours of research to build a system that doesn't have random bottlenecks if you're going to be doing massive-media manipulation like video editing.
So does the new MacBook tromp most Windows PCs you can buy or build? You betcha it can, that's no surprise at all. Even those with significantly higher spec 'parts' when the underlying motherboard cripples everything so it can't live up to those specs.
- WolfWings
Yawn
That was true with Haswell in what 2013?! The Broadwell E and Skylake-E and maybe even Skylake has plenty of lanes, USB 3, and Thunderbolt/USB type C. As Apple added these so did Intel for the PC. Infact Intel invented it!! No you did not need a $600 workstation grade Xeon chipset either. A regular Skylake has it all and can do exactly what you described. True a junk HP will not, but neither will the cheapest macs either. Any $150 or up Asus or Gigabyte board or Dell Precision Workstation will all of these
Pfft since Apple neutered their products all the real video editors switched to that monster Adobe Premiere.
The only thing the Apple users have correct in which I give credit is PC screens SUCK! IPS is almost non existent so the colors and gamma do not look the same at different angles and the calibration SUCKS. if you are viewing a screen from a coworker you are seeing something different.
Now there are expensive ok screens for the PC that cost hundreds which I highly recommend for any engineer, salesperson (to show stuff to clients), and video artists. But, none for the laptops.
Actually the MS Surface is IPS and the closest to Mac quality I see.
Windows historically before Windows 7 didn't offer Adobe color monitor profiles either. The WindowsXP lovers drove me nuts over this when they still used Photoshop on their old pcs :-) It also is why the Gimp is no photoshop and Linux is no replacement for Windows/macOSX for these users either.
But, that is it these days. The mac pro in 2013 did have freaking amazing professional graphics cards but you could get that on a workstation class PC. If laptop makers make decent screens then it is all over the Apple lovers out there. The graphics at the mac pro are sooo laughable and 2010 era in performance it makes me wonder why Apple even bothered and just stuck with Intel integrated graphics? They screwed up big time and tried to make the Macbook Pro an iphone. It is not a phone folks! We got the air for these teenagers who do light work and Twitter all day.
Because he is endorsed by God! The Bible states countless times the consequences for immorality and disbelief.
We have transgenders pissing in the bathrooms! That's right?! They might touch your kids and raise your taxes?;
We need a moral man ASAP who is convicted of child molestation to lead this country back to earn God's favor!
Signed your typical redneck voter who is Republican and voted to make sure the next supreme Court judge believes these things which is frightening accurate according to polls
He said out right he would shoot first and ask questions later if Iran got aggressive in the sea
Suuure you won't see him start a war. Rather they would declare a war on him!
You Americans voted for him and deserve all the ridicule and consequences for your actions.
In about 3 months that man will have all the codes to nuclear weapons.
We will see the results to come.
Isn't it funny that the NSA contributed code to SELinux and SystemD?
A big black box that touches everything would be a government's dream and SystemD does it perfectly. See conspiracy theory
I don't know about the rest of slashdot readers, but from my point of view, Chrome is a great browser for apathetic users who don't have very sophisticated expectations in terms of extensibility and privacy features. With Firefox you have a much richer selection of add-ons and other niceties like, for instance, the ability to synchronize your data to your own server, rather than being entirely dependent on someone's so-called "cloud". Whereas Mozilla remains committed to a decentralized web, Google has managed to progressively blur the lines between browser and web property.
I suppose Chrome is not as horrific as whatever Facebook might come up with if they ever decided to make a browser, but that's not saying much for Chrome. I'm a user of many Google products, but when it comes to browsers I'll be sticking with the content-neutral product that prioritizes my freedom and privacy - Firefox!
Well everyone is different.
To me I want a fast browser that is secure and takes advantage of my hardware and syncs up everything with all platforms. Chrome is it! Both modern IE and Chrome use threading per tab which means under Windows it uses c"\users\%appdata\lowrights. It is sandboxed at the kernel level! It also means my i7 can utilize all my cores with both browsers by MS and Google.
Firefox keeps getting hacked as a result and I do not want to run workarounds for this architectural limit with sandboxie. I just want something to work and have no radical changes.
When I need more functionality I use an app. If I want a browser I pick Chrome. Firefox lost me at 4.0. Remember that release? AWFULL. Worse was the versions that kept breaking everything. I just wanted one version for 2 years. IE 9 came out which no longer required hacks and had full hardware acceleration and smooth scrool. I was hooked in 2011 and started using IE 11 and then Chrome by the end of the year.
Well I haven't used Firefox since except for special occasions and I am reminded each time how a modern browser is so much nicer. The next version of Firefox will be at 2008 level technology soon of Chrome 1.0 and IE 8 with electrosys where I can get a real sandbox and threading and process isolation for security.
Chrome is what Phoenix was to Mozilla today.
Sigh
Firefox I guess. The good news is with electrosys it has caught up to 2009 IE 8 and Chrome 1.0 in terms of security by using lowrights in c:\users\%appdata and threading per process which is nice if you have more than 1 cpu core which is everyone but grandma here in 2016.
But it is too little too late for me personally to use Firefox again, but try it as the newer versions supposed to be caught up.
Just put that tag I listed above.
Eventually I will start to use Edge html 5.1 features, but for now it's too cutting edge and changing and a small percentage.
But users hate it. IE got Ok by version 9 for Joe Six pack and Ok by IE 10 for developers. Not great but it did it's job. Edge gives me subscription errors with AdBlock and crashes when I loaded it. It feels alpha quality and made for phones. Not pcs. IE 11 is still part of 10. I replaced edge and put an IE icon on the taskbar to test things.
X-UA-Compatible Css tag will save us for awhile until IE 11 becomes too out of date. I refuse to test on Edge
IE is a better browser. I can't believe I wrote that but Edge is crash and misses things like favorites. Has MS added it yet?
I always put X-UA-Compatible in Css to force edge to use IE so I do not have to work around bugs.
So my guess is those who think the blue E for internet out of habit upgraded to 10 they found a web which was broken and switched
Trump fans are gullible and stupid. Bernie supporters not so much.
Sad and pathetic
Nice to see you quoting their material
And use jails. I don't seem to have this problem. Oh what is this SystemD I keep hearing about too?
You mean something like this ?
For Joe Six pack the appstore is there for simplicity too
Go Freebsd and you never have to worry about eventually upgrading or having very outdated systems. ZFS and jails are nice too!
I use Freebsd and don't seem to have this problem. ZFS and jails are nice too
Boy it seems we cannot find any qualified candidates!
I wonder where we can find top talent at the given price point??!
NIH still uses XP and IE 6.
I thought they did still pay MS for custom patches
Really so people still like using XP and IE 6 in 2016? Wow
It's a dual core hyperthreaded.
Linux us more secure due to app armor and SELinux. I wish this existed for FreeBSD