If it weren't so very complicated to actually sign your own binaries and have a nice keystore... userfriendly and all (within the firmware of course), perferably standardized that once you know it for one machine, you know it for all... Yes, then it would be nice...
Because it causes all kinds of problems. Doesn't even have to be Linux. Talk to people who tried installing 7 on their 8 machine... If you don't know about secureboot (We're at the high end of the tech spectrum here, but just a few steps down there are "Windows reinstallers"... e.g. Windows power users who may not know about secureboot).
I said "it's not so bad, you can disabled it", and then we get many people posting that on their machine they couldn't.... yeah, it is a big problem... Perhaps not for you, perhaps not for me... but for many people... And FSM knows I'm going to curse a lot if I get a machine where I can't disable it completely.
Okay... That's annoying. Isn't there an option "legacy BIOS" or something. The wording is not standardized (typical for BIOS). Anyway, yes, it's terribly annoying if it can't do that. I'll believe you on your word that some manufacturers fucked this up.
Of course... On x86 you can disabled it with a BIOS setting (okay, technically "EFI setting"). For now I haven't seen one that didn't allow it. It's sometimes pretty hard to get into the BIOS, but hey, once you're in, you're in.
Come on, I really wanted to try it out... Not that I'm a student or going college or so;-) Just trolling their systems a bit. Besides, a cheap Win8 PC is good for running Linux, isn't it?
As someone married to a "failed suice case", I can assert it's not only medical personnel biased against them. It's pretty much everybody. The reason for this is that most people do not understand fully what goes on in someone whi tries to kill herself. My first reaction was also "how could she?", but after nearly four year, I have a slight idea. I will never really comprehend it.
To be in topic. My wife always battled with being overweight. She has managed to bring it down to healthier levels, eg when we got married, but it is an eternal struggle. If your body keeps yelling "I'm hungry", try stopping eating.
Anyway, given her mode of suicide,, she seriously limited her mobility and I don't see how she could ever lose weight again to "medical accepted levels". She's overweight, but constantly the same weight.
Well, that's why I didn't explain the whole thing. You're not allowed to carry over anything normally. Except IF you asked for them and they were not granted. So, the loophole is to ask for them when it's impossible and then you can carry them over. Furthermore, those days carried over need to be taken before the 31st March. Depending on the company, you can agree with them that you keep them. Most allow that, or they pay you out. (Which to most people is the desirable option, to me it isn't as I'm pretty well paid resulting in insane taxation) The alternative is having no staff in February/March;-)
But yeah, I have enough vacation and never know when to take them. Being in Europe doesn't help much against that.
I don't hear about nightmare housing situations where 20% of a country's homes sit vacant while nearly the same number of people are homeless.
No, you don't hear those... They do exist. I live in Luxembourg, which is -granted- a quite peculiar place to live. In the capital (which is small, by any reasonable standards), there are 2900 homes empty (source: Près de 2900 logements vides dans la capitale. Link is in French). I don't know how many homes there are in the city, but given a population of 80000, with an average of 3 people per home (wild guess), we're talking 11% vacant. People want to live there, but it's simply cost-prohibitive. Owners don't want to rent cheaper: they'd rather have their buildings vacant than getting less than the perceived market rate.
I'm well paid, so is my wife (she actually makes more than I do, if she would work full-time) and we did manage to buy ourself a small home. We need to work both, though, and we did get a significant financial aid from my parents. Alone would be impossible. This brings me to another example: the house we got, is newly built. Formerly a big house was on the terrain, which was split for three smaller houses. This particular big house, was built in the mid seventies, and had been vacant since 2000. We just moved in our house, so, that's over 10 years completely vacant. The reason? Nobody can afford these kind of houses any more, especially if they're require some restoration. I don't even live in the city, a house like mine in the city is unaffordable, even for people in my income class.
Personally, I have no idea how, let's say, a cashier married to a bus driver (which is surprisingly well paid!) can even subsist in our country. I know as per fact, that many people with lower wages, just leave the country. Sure, it's not all that hard to do, given the country is so small.
I'm pretty sure, you'll find situations like these in many locations with high real-estate prices: Paris, London, etc...
It ought to be a law that they have to pay you for unused vacation, especially if they don't allow you to use it.
In my country, that exists (in some form, too long to totally explain the details). I simply don't want that. Those are taxed so high, I would effectively be paid lower than minimum wage. So gimme me free days? Can't... Fine, as long as I don't lose them... I'll take them later, or when I quit.
A dozen... It can be done manually and I ain't getting a server, even if I wanted one. The mantra of my boss is: I pay you anyway, you can do it manually. So, that's what I do. Windows on the desktop is okay in a business setting, but on the server I really rather have Linux or another Unix. WSUS should be implemented on *nix, so you can avoid Windows on the server entirely. Of course, I do realise that's wishful thinking.
I also preferred the "Menu" system of Gnome 2. Thing is: that concept is going the way of the dodo (Mac OS X doesn't have it at all, Windows 8 shows their vision of the future, which isn't rosy either). I don't like it either, but it's the way it is. To make it useful for me, I just changed the dock to the applications I use most. The last time I tried Gnome3, I didn't understand what to do whatsoever. Okay, that's a while ago. It might be better now.
The application "dock" is also pretty annoying, especially since it only seems to pop up every second time I try
I think you are referring to the fact that the dock used to auto-hide in earlier releases. It doesn't do that any more. I vastly prefer it that way.
I like to use the following comparison: A VPN is like pulling a real cable between two machines that are separated over a large (or even short) distance.
I mean, he does have a high-profile Linux distribution he's responsible for. He has the problem that people hate change and he needs to take decisions. The thing is: change can be right too. Unity has many haters, but from the latest LTS release on, it is actually pretty good. I like using it now, and I originally dreaded the switch for my two "normal" users on it, being my mother and mother in law. I expected support calls to no end, when I finally did switch them from 10.04 (Gnome2) to 12.04 (Unity).
Surprisingly, neither had any problems adapting. That shows me that he was right: for normal users it is actually not all that hard. That said: when Unity was released it really did have a lot of rough edges. That's what it gave a bad reputation, IMHO.
Microsoft has the same problem: change is hated by their users. Probably even more so, in the Windows ecosystem.
I'm normally a proponent of "don't fix it if it's not not broken". The problem is that the Gnome guys "broke" Gnome, and thus they said "we can do this better". Whether this "better" is truly "better" lies in the eye of the beholder. My experience is: the common user reacts positively to it. That's a win in my book.
Yes, that is true... However, it's not the whole story. Especially not where I live, considering iPhones. A mid-range iPhone contract costs 45€/month for everything flat-rate, except roaming. When you subscribe to that contract you get an iPhone 4S for 49€ or an iPhone 5 for 149€. The thing is: there is no contract that is cheaper which would provide the same functionality.
I don't have an iPhone. My wife does. She got it two years ago, with that plan. The phone is still perfectly fine. Still holds charge, still functions as expected. It is entirely sufficient for her needs. We could chose not to renew the contract and get a new phone, but we'd continue paying those 49€/month any way. So, I went to my telco, gave then 149€ and renewed the contract. My wife has a new iPhone 5, I have a new toy to play around with (her old iPhone 4) and all that just because I renewed a contract and spent a bit of money (basically, 149€/24 = 6.21€/month for the next two years).
The alternative would have been to let my telco get away with a fat margin for all the months that iPhone 4 would have continued working exceeding the contract time. I don't know about you, but I'd rather spoil my wife a bit than give them extra money.
Ehm, that's why you set your router in "bridge" mode and use it as a dumb ADSL modem. Or, if you're like my dad and have real fiber at home, you just plug into the ONT. No more modem needed. Sure, you have to do the PPPoE yourself on firewall/router-machine, but that works just fine. (Fiber with a ONT, usually involves adding a VLAN and the do PPPoE over the VLAN)
SecureBoot is enable by default on Win8 machines. It might have complicated things, as I don't think 7 truly supports it. Of course, any tech worth is salt should know about these things.
Slashdot Mirror
If it weren't so very complicated to actually sign your own binaries and have a nice keystore... userfriendly and all (within the firmware of course), perferably standardized that once you know it for one machine, you know it for all... Yes, then it would be nice...
I said "it's not so bad, you can disabled it", and then we get many people posting that on their machine they couldn't .... yeah, it is a big problem... Perhaps not for you, perhaps not for me... but for many people... And FSM knows I'm going to curse a lot if I get a machine where I can't disable it completely.
Okay... That's annoying. Isn't there an option "legacy BIOS" or something. The wording is not standardized (typical for BIOS). Anyway, yes, it's terribly annoying if it can't do that. I'll believe you on your word that some manufacturers fucked this up.
Not that I claim it isn't a problem. SecureBoot is a BIG problem, but for now, they let us work around it.
Of course... On x86 you can disabled it with a BIOS setting (okay, technically "EFI setting"). For now I haven't seen one that didn't allow it. It's sometimes pretty hard to get into the BIOS, but hey, once you're in, you're in.
Come on, I really wanted to try it out... Not that I'm a student or going college or so ;-) Just trolling their systems a bit. Besides, a cheap Win8 PC is good for running Linux, isn't it?
To be in topic. My wife always battled with being overweight. She has managed to bring it down to healthier levels, eg when we got married, but it is an eternal struggle. If your body keeps yelling "I'm hungry", try stopping eating. Anyway, given her mode of suicide,, she seriously limited her mobility and I don't see how she could ever lose weight again to "medical accepted levels". She's overweight, but constantly the same weight.
There is no such thing as a red-skinned human. (Fitzpatrick scale, Von Luschan's chromatic scale)
Hmmm, here it's a 5€ increase for a six fold speed increase, but I found that acceptable.
But yeah, I have enough vacation and never know when to take them. Being in Europe doesn't help much against that.
No, you don't hear those... They do exist. I live in Luxembourg, which is -granted- a quite peculiar place to live. In the capital (which is small, by any reasonable standards), there are 2900 homes empty (source: Près de 2900 logements vides dans la capitale. Link is in French). I don't know how many homes there are in the city, but given a population of 80000, with an average of 3 people per home (wild guess), we're talking 11% vacant. People want to live there, but it's simply cost-prohibitive. Owners don't want to rent cheaper: they'd rather have their buildings vacant than getting less than the perceived market rate.
I'm well paid, so is my wife (she actually makes more than I do, if she would work full-time) and we did manage to buy ourself a small home. We need to work both, though, and we did get a significant financial aid from my parents. Alone would be impossible. This brings me to another example: the house we got, is newly built. Formerly a big house was on the terrain, which was split for three smaller houses. This particular big house, was built in the mid seventies, and had been vacant since 2000. We just moved in our house, so, that's over 10 years completely vacant. The reason? Nobody can afford these kind of houses any more, especially if they're require some restoration. I don't even live in the city, a house like mine in the city is unaffordable, even for people in my income class.
Personally, I have no idea how, let's say, a cashier married to a bus driver (which is surprisingly well paid!) can even subsist in our country. I know as per fact, that many people with lower wages, just leave the country. Sure, it's not all that hard to do, given the country is so small.
I'm pretty sure, you'll find situations like these in many locations with high real-estate prices: Paris, London, etc...
In my country, that exists (in some form, too long to totally explain the details). I simply don't want that. Those are taxed so high, I would effectively be paid lower than minimum wage. So gimme me free days? Can't... Fine, as long as I don't lose them... I'll take them later, or when I quit.
A dozen... It can be done manually and I ain't getting a server, even if I wanted one. The mantra of my boss is: I pay you anyway, you can do it manually. So, that's what I do. Windows on the desktop is okay in a business setting, but on the server I really rather have Linux or another Unix. WSUS should be implemented on *nix, so you can avoid Windows on the server entirely. Of course, I do realise that's wishful thinking.
Can I have a WSUS server that doesn't involve shelling out for a Windows Server license?
Something fun I found recently
Good one... Made me smile :-D
I think you are referring to the fact that the dock used to auto-hide in earlier releases. It doesn't do that any more. I vastly prefer it that way.
I'm more worried that there actually would be a recording....
I like to use the following comparison: A VPN is like pulling a real cable between two machines that are separated over a large (or even short) distance.
I mean, he does have a high-profile Linux distribution he's responsible for. He has the problem that people hate change and he needs to take decisions. The thing is: change can be right too. Unity has many haters, but from the latest LTS release on, it is actually pretty good. I like using it now, and I originally dreaded the switch for my two "normal" users on it, being my mother and mother in law. I expected support calls to no end, when I finally did switch them from 10.04 (Gnome2) to 12.04 (Unity).
Surprisingly, neither had any problems adapting. That shows me that he was right: for normal users it is actually not all that hard. That said: when Unity was released it really did have a lot of rough edges. That's what it gave a bad reputation, IMHO.
Microsoft has the same problem: change is hated by their users. Probably even more so, in the Windows ecosystem.
I'm normally a proponent of "don't fix it if it's not not broken". The problem is that the Gnome guys "broke" Gnome, and thus they said "we can do this better". Whether this "better" is truly "better" lies in the eye of the beholder. My experience is: the common user reacts positively to it. That's a win in my book.
I don't have an iPhone. My wife does. She got it two years ago, with that plan. The phone is still perfectly fine. Still holds charge, still functions as expected. It is entirely sufficient for her needs. We could chose not to renew the contract and get a new phone, but we'd continue paying those 49€/month any way. So, I went to my telco, gave then 149€ and renewed the contract. My wife has a new iPhone 5, I have a new toy to play around with (her old iPhone 4) and all that just because I renewed a contract and spent a bit of money (basically, 149€/24 = 6.21€/month for the next two years).
The alternative would have been to let my telco get away with a fat margin for all the months that iPhone 4 would have continued working exceeding the contract time. I don't know about you, but I'd rather spoil my wife a bit than give them extra money.
Disable the auto-update feature. That's usually what does this.
Ehm, that's why you set your router in "bridge" mode and use it as a dumb ADSL modem. Or, if you're like my dad and have real fiber at home, you just plug into the ONT. No more modem needed. Sure, you have to do the PPPoE yourself on firewall/router-machine, but that works just fine. (Fiber with a ONT, usually involves adding a VLAN and the do PPPoE over the VLAN)
SecureBoot is enable by default on Win8 machines. It might have complicated things, as I don't think 7 truly supports it. Of course, any tech worth is salt should know about these things.
Ouch. Yes, well, most people are stuck with OEM copies, so I assumed you were "most people". My mistake.