if they do have news moderators then it must be a global team because in the UK the trending items are rarely about USA, at least I don't think. The only item I can recall seeing recently on the trending segment was reaction to Katie Hopkins' assertion that she would run naked down Regent Street with a sausage up her bum if Sadiq Khan won the London mayoral election. Quite what purpose the sausage serves is lost on me. Anyway, I imagine the response to either name in any other country would be "Who?".
And if your response is "Who?", then take my word for it, you don't want to see Katie Hopkins naked.
Yeah, I don't think there is such a thing as a truly unbiased media platform and people will like the ones that support their beliefs and complain about the ones that don't. The worst case scenario being finding yourself working for an organisation that's on the other side.
I think the real issue is that the data was probably not much more difficult to acquire than pocketing a candy bar at the 7-11 and that's not really the hackers' fault. Sure, punish them but those that were responsible for the lax security should not escape reprimand for their negligence as so often seems to be the case when these things happen.
I was about to say that lots of people give away some of their time for free (organizing social events, amateur sports teams, etc.) but I realized that's because where I live you actually tend have some spare time and you're probably in the USA and so won't have any.
I mean a UK citizen posting to a US based site must be slightly out of the ordinary behaviour worthy of further investigation, right? Anyway I was just after a general evaluation of how you think my posts are. I got a +5 funny once you know.
Thanks,
Yours faithf... you already know my real name and where I live anyway, don't you?
That would put a monetary value on each account which is related to it's standing within whatever forum, and the money being flung about in the presidential campaign is a lot more than most people would ever see. Do you have a price that you'd sell a social media account for?
Sure, any account purchased like that would quickly lose any credibility but it would have a short window of usefulness.
Not yet, but in UK it seems that the restricted areas keep proliferating. There's a park near my work that just put up "this is a smoke-free zone" signs, and this is in the open air. Ridiculous. But I digress.
But we try to keep minors away from them.
And there's the real problem. It was always the shop worker that was the gatekeeper to bar tobacco, alcohol and porn from minors. It wasn't a perfect system and everyone knew workarounds but it was good enough to appease the majority. Now the porn is readily available as digital media and there has been a scrambling around by legislators in all countries to have a gatekeeper but none of them seem to have proposed a reasonable and workable solution yet. They just cobble something together to win votes.
I meant in the context of them being in cahoots with any government on earth, as the conspiracy in the article alleges. I do absolutely believe that extraterrestrial life will exist but I also absolutely believe that it's never been anywhere near this planet.
people will claim anything to "prove" aliens exist.
They already do and not just for aliens. Replace "aliens exist" with any false statement and it sums them up. For example, "the earth is flat", "god exists", "Obama was born in Africa", "trickle down economics works", the list is endless.
Neutrons (and gravitation waves?) are not affected by the matter
I think you mean neutrinos. Neutrons represent about half the mass of normal matter and don't pass through it easily. Gravity waves would theoretically be propagated by the graviton but since it's never been proven to exist it's hard to say what its attributes are.
Only because it was a local radio presenter that made the initial suggestion. If a Daily Mail journalist had got the idea first it could very well have been just that.
Given they might not have been too bright in the first place and may also have insured their new toy, particularly as many get fitted with expensive digital cameras, someone just needs to browse the insurance claims from the area.
If the camera memory survived and is found that could be some nice footage.
It's not the done thing to read the articles I know.
Essentially, it's been suggested that the event was caused by two comets that were undiscovered at the time. Their next passes are due soon and proposer of the hypothesis is requesting funds to buy radio telescope time during the passes. If he gets the funding and finds nothing then we won't have any explanation and can still say it might be aliens.
What's more worrying is the implication that the poster would consider themselves an ubermensch. Granted one without an uber-skill in languages but an ubermensch nonetheless.
Tropical means within the tropics, i.e. between the latitudes that the solar zenith touches at the solstices. Plate tectonics are why England was once tropical and might be again (I don't know what the long term movement is projected to be).
So now that it's the run-up to the EU exit referendum in the UK, the Google search engine will be modified so that any "should UK leave the EU" search will simply return "Yes, because we want to keep our tax situation secret in the UK".
Ah yes, selection bias: enabling people to convince themselves they are most definitely, unquestionably and unarguably right since the dawn of civilization.
Slashdot Mirror
if they do have news moderators then it must be a global team because in the UK the trending items are rarely about USA, at least I don't think. The only item I can recall seeing recently on the trending segment was reaction to Katie Hopkins' assertion that she would run naked down Regent Street with a sausage up her bum if Sadiq Khan won the London mayoral election. Quite what purpose the sausage serves is lost on me. Anyway, I imagine the response to either name in any other country would be "Who?".
And if your response is "Who?", then take my word for it, you don't want to see Katie Hopkins naked.
Yeah, I don't think there is such a thing as a truly unbiased media platform and people will like the ones that support their beliefs and complain about the ones that don't. The worst case scenario being finding yourself working for an organisation that's on the other side.
The moral here is never accept friend requests from family. Requests from work colleagues are also best left unaccepted.
However, if it's a side affect of killing them, then that's actually okay.
I think loss of vision is a side effect of being killed in 100% of fatalities.
Uhm... you have to post from a logged in account to undo moderation.
I think the real issue is that the data was probably not much more difficult to acquire than pocketing a candy bar at the 7-11 and that's not really the hackers' fault. Sure, punish them but those that were responsible for the lax security should not escape reprimand for their negligence as so often seems to be the case when these things happen.
I don't like coffee. Do you have any tea?
I was about to say that lots of people give away some of their time for free (organizing social events, amateur sports teams, etc.) but I realized that's because where I live you actually tend have some spare time and you're probably in the USA and so won't have any.
I don't see a problem with those results not becoming publicly available.
Suppressed is another word for that. And it has caused a few problems in the pharmaceutical field.
Dear GCHQ employee who reads my slashdot posts,
I mean a UK citizen posting to a US based site must be slightly out of the ordinary behaviour worthy of further investigation, right? Anyway I was just after a general evaluation of how you think my posts are. I got a +5 funny once you know.
Thanks,
Yours faithf... you already know my real name and where I live anyway, don't you?
Thanks for the quick summary of today's Daily Mail.
That would put a monetary value on each account which is related to it's standing within whatever forum, and the money being flung about in the presidential campaign is a lot more than most people would ever see. Do you have a price that you'd sell a social media account for?
Sure, any account purchased like that would quickly lose any credibility but it would have a short window of usefulness.
Cigarettes haven't been banned.
Not yet, but in UK it seems that the restricted areas keep proliferating. There's a park near my work that just put up "this is a smoke-free zone" signs, and this is in the open air. Ridiculous. But I digress.
But we try to keep minors away from them.
And there's the real problem. It was always the shop worker that was the gatekeeper to bar tobacco, alcohol and porn from minors. It wasn't a perfect system and everyone knew workarounds but it was good enough to appease the majority. Now the porn is readily available as digital media and there has been a scrambling around by legislators in all countries to have a gatekeeper but none of them seem to have proposed a reasonable and workable solution yet. They just cobble something together to win votes.
I meant in the context of them being in cahoots with any government on earth, as the conspiracy in the article alleges. I do absolutely believe that extraterrestrial life will exist but I also absolutely believe that it's never been anywhere near this planet.
Hang on, I was just reading an earlier article about bogus, nonsense books on Kindle. Is this an example of one?
people will claim anything to "prove" aliens exist.
They already do and not just for aliens. Replace "aliens exist" with any false statement and it sums them up. For example, "the earth is flat", "god exists", "Obama was born in Africa", "trickle down economics works", the list is endless.
Neutrons (and gravitation waves?) are not affected by the matter
I think you mean neutrinos. Neutrons represent about half the mass of normal matter and don't pass through it easily. Gravity waves would theoretically be propagated by the graviton but since it's never been proven to exist it's hard to say what its attributes are.
Elections on the other hand seem to be taken about as seriously as that boat name vote by many people.
It's the only explanation for the current UK government.
Only because it was a local radio presenter that made the initial suggestion. If a Daily Mail journalist had got the idea first it could very well have been just that.
Given they might not have been too bright in the first place and may also have insured their new toy, particularly as many get fitted with expensive digital cameras, someone just needs to browse the insurance claims from the area.
If the camera memory survived and is found that could be some nice footage.
It's not the done thing to read the articles I know.
Essentially, it's been suggested that the event was caused by two comets that were undiscovered at the time. Their next passes are due soon and proposer of the hypothesis is requesting funds to buy radio telescope time during the passes. If he gets the funding and finds nothing then we won't have any explanation and can still say it might be aliens.
What's more worrying is the implication that the poster would consider themselves an ubermensch. Granted one without an uber-skill in languages but an ubermensch nonetheless.
Why shouldn't England be tropical (again)?
Tropical means within the tropics, i.e. between the latitudes that the solar zenith touches at the solstices. Plate tectonics are why England was once tropical and might be again (I don't know what the long term movement is projected to be).
So now that it's the run-up to the EU exit referendum in the UK, the Google search engine will be modified so that any "should UK leave the EU" search will simply return "Yes, because we want to keep our tax situation secret in the UK".
Ah yes, selection bias: enabling people to convince themselves they are most definitely, unquestionably and unarguably right since the dawn of civilization.