hahaha - see the light and weep!
on
OpenMosix
·
· Score: -1
finally linux users, admit linux is useless!
we have *bsd for servers, which is actually secure, does not fall over, and is server, not desktop based
then we have windows 2000 professioanl for the desktop, there is no better desktop os
for clustering here we have openmosix and for embedded devices there is qnx, so you see, there is really no need for linux except to control swimming pools.
if i get modded down, it only shows ppl cant handle the truth, or that they are ignoring the truth.
haha no arguments, how lame. we have freebsd which is not secure, openbsd which is too slow for performance, and netbsd which runs on a dreamcast. then we have linux with a better license, runs on stuff that matters, is secure, and beats freebsd in performance.
Personally, i dont see the point in any of the *bsd's, except for maybe netbsd and portability. for stability there is debian and slack, security, well any system can be made secure, so that leaves openbsd uesless. long live linux, which unlike the *bsd's is not dying.
OPENBSD IS NOT SECURE
on
Review: Kung Pow
·
· Score: -1, Offtopic
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
Now, i dont want to start a war or anything, but earth is the only planet that we know that sustains life, could this be divine intervention? thoughts worth thinking about in my opinon. i hope this gets a good mod.
Why would doing anything to a satelite be worthwile? Unles you can eavesdrop onconversation, zoom in on Saray Michelles breasts, or shoot lasers, then it seems pretty useless.
I dont think a satelite can be used to crash, doesnt it burn up as it renenters?
You may think you know it all, but you dont, wow, programming since 12? man, basic is so advanced! And also, you have read heaps of cs books? oh you mean like tcp for dummies and um... hacking exposed and maybe using windows productivly? ahh so many ppl like you, be hapy with the job you are in, stay with what you understand.
BBC using ogg has nothing to do with open source, they are using it to reach a wider audience and because it is superior, because it suits them better, they dont care if it is open source or not.
Slashdot Mirror
finally linux users, admit linux is useless!
we have *bsd for servers, which is actually secure, does not fall over, and is server, not desktop based
then we have windows 2000 professioanl for the desktop, there is no better desktop os
for clustering here we have openmosix and for embedded devices there is qnx, so you see, there is really no need for linux except to control swimming pools.
if i get modded down, it only shows ppl cant handle the truth, or that they are ignoring the truth.
haha no arguments, how lame. we have freebsd which is not secure, openbsd which is too slow for performance, and netbsd which runs on a dreamcast. then we have linux with a better license, runs on stuff that matters, is secure, and beats freebsd in performance.
Personally, i dont see the point in any of the *bsd's, except for maybe netbsd and portability. for stability there is debian and slack, security, well any system can be made secure, so that leaves openbsd uesless. long live linux, which unlike the *bsd's is not dying.
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
you are kidding right? who cares about the name baybe, openwall and lids, just try and hack my box!
sorry people but i must spred the truth, openbsd is not secure, windows is audited, so is openbsd, auditing == not secure! linux and openwall is far more secure, although openbsd's inetd.conf is secure, comments?
yeeha
what about using an encrypted filesystem via a loopback device? the data is still there, but nice and encrypted.
Now, i dont want to start a war or anything, but earth is the only planet that we know that sustains life, could this be divine intervention? thoughts worth thinking about in my opinon. i hope this gets a good mod.
Why would doing anything to a satelite be worthwile? Unles you can eavesdrop onconversation, zoom in on Saray Michelles breasts, or shoot lasers, then it seems pretty useless.
I dont think a satelite can be used to crash, doesnt it burn up as it renenters?
i used to hat vim, still do, no different from vi that i notice, but vi is just so quick for me, i still have to use pico to paste text.
where and who are the moron moderators on this site? how the hell was my post flamebait?
dvd,s are movies, why the hell do movies need encryption? easy, they dont, riaa fuckers are control freaks and wont allow foa to ensue. fuckers.
You may think you know it all, but you dont, wow, programming since 12? man, basic is so advanced! And also, you have read heaps of cs books? oh you mean like tcp for dummies and um ... hacking exposed and maybe using windows productivly? ahh so many ppl like you, be hapy with the job you are in, stay with what you understand.
you think your so cool? ur just a fag man, look at your homepage!!! give me your ip gay little windows user and ill fuck u up real good
you fucking cunt whoar, fucking post shit like that agian and i will ............grrrr you make me so farking angry no balls coward
BBC using ogg has nothing to do with open source, they are using it to reach a wider audience and because it is superior, because it suits them better, they dont care if it is open source or not.
the fact remains, ms code *can* be secure, obviously just not xp, good to see them getting their act togethor
lol, mp3's own ogg