The serial number needs to be updated so that bind will pick up the new zone, and so that secondary servers replicating from it will also see the change.
It's got nothing at all to do with 3rd party servers on the net caching responses.
Breaking encryption that controls access to a copyrighted work is what is against the DMCA.
Unless nikon is claiming copyright protection on their white balance information, it woudln't have much of a chance of winning (and it's hardly an original or creative work)
I agree with you to a point. The daycare as a business, though, has a responsibility to keep abusive people off it's staff. Not being able to hold corporations accountable for the actions of individual employees on the job is part of the reason why corporations are so hard to touch.
I've seen lots of justifications for why having the pagefile enabled is good... but in the end, if you have enough memory for the tasks you are going to perform, windows performs faster with the pagefile disabled completely.
They don't need to discuss bandwidth per customer and total numbers.. this thing can carry a payload.. which means it can carry all kinds of communications equipment, equipment which can be changed over time.
As for weight: If strong winds it it? there is very little wind, ever, at 65000 feet.
A vacuum only gives you something like 10% more buoyancy, but it would take more than 10% more material to make something rigid capable of holding that vacuum.. it's not worth it.
But if AOL specifically went out of their way to make chat rooms that were SAFE for young children, by actively having people monitor them and keep them acceptable, tha'ts a selling feature to parents.
It's like if you sent your kid to daycare, and he was mistrated.. would you say to that parent "You should have been there, how dare you trust your kid to some daycare?"
Because the fonts are part of the final work, not just used to generate it.
The excemption from distributing source for unchanged binaries only applies in a non-commercial setting, the language is specific about this.
You are correct that the output of GPL programs does not fall under the GPL, however, with fonts, we are talking about distributing the essay with the fonts, making it a derived work. You don't distribute GCC along with your code.
This is all silly though, the main point is the GPL wasn't intended for fonts or other graphic items.. it was meant for program source code. To use it in another field is to invite trouble.
Look at it this way. The fonts themselves are the copyrighted work, the look shape and feel of them, and the source files that generate them. Using them in your own creative work makes your work a derived work.
It's not at all the same as compilinig code with GCC. The output of GPL software is not GPL itself.. but in the case of fonts, the completed work includes the fonts, in fact, is made up of them.
It sounds rediculous, right? We all agree on that, but to use that as some kind of negative aspec to fhte GPL is ludicrous... the GPL was made for source code of computer software, not fonts. Applying the language of the GPL to other domains is bound to have some caveats.
It is primarily used for voip, actually, though handles leased lines (T1, E1, etc) perfectly well with supported hardware. Everything form $20 pots cards so you can use it as an answering machine at home to multiple T1 cards are supported... and lots of voip.
You can do everything with it, but configuration is a lot of text files in true unix fashion.. it's more of a framework than a completed solution... which is what the article is about.. asterisk is really powerful, but setting up a complicated setup is sort of, well, complicated (though I find the complexity is about right for the level of flexibility)
In many cases it's not to get an assessment of your work.. it's to simply get an assessment of network security. It should not be taken so personally.. you should be looking forward to the results and using them to better your setup, not feeling offended that you are being judged.
- Run common tools like nessus yourself, and document the results. Indicate the false positives in a report. Indicate how real issues have been fixed. Give a copy to whoever might care.
- Don't pay third party companies if all you are going to get back is the output of nessus or some such thing. If all they are going to give you is the unverified output of open source tools, they aren't adding any value to your operation.
- If you guys are going to hire third parties, YOU, the sysadmin, be the one to initiate the process. You are also the only one qualified to interpret the results. If there are things on the list that are not valid or not high enough risk to worry about, document the fact and be done with it.
Yes, however, it appears that a great many things that were cut were very fundamental, memorable things about the book. Things that define the story outright. Certainly, there are many things you can leave out and/or tweak and still keep the spirit of the original alive, but no towel?
It will harm the industry, if the industry doesn't change. They've had plenty of opportunity, and they certainly have the money and time to figure it out.
The problem is, they sat on their asses and whined instead of developing something new. Amateurs with home computers ended up with far better, more efficient distribution systems than the industry itself had. That there are copyright violations is a side effect of this.
The video industry is doing the same thing... look at all the HD downloads online, yet we still don't have a solid HD-media standard. There is more HD material available online than at the local video store (which has none). Problem? You bet.
That might be one for the lawyers. Private transactions can be in any form the parties involved will mutually accept.
legal tender only applies to contractual debts.
Whether or not this constitutes a debt might be fuzzy.. you haven't left the premesis with the product yet, so technicall the gas does not belong to you yet. They could siphon it back out, for instance.
Contrast to a restaurant, where it's definately a debt, because you have been allowed to consume the food (as well as use the service) before being charged.
legal tender applies to contractual debts.. not regular private business transactions.
If you buy a slurpee at 7-11, the law does not regulate in any way the terms of the business exchange. You can agree to pay in whatever terms the 7-11 and you agree to, be it cash, smiles, or jellybeans. THe 7-11 can insist on pennies, for sure.
The legal tender designation only applies to settling contractual debts, like when you eat at a restaurant and then they give you a bill afterwards, or when you purchase a vehicle, or a house, etc.
Slashdot Mirror
Except there is no evidence at all that IBM used SCO's code to enhance linux, to date there has not been one shred of code that suggests this.
But you can't assume that. Just because something is encrypted does not mean it's something that qualifies for DMCA protection.
Seee the printer cartridge fiasco.
The serial number needs to be updated so that bind will pick up the new zone, and so that secondary servers replicating from it will also see the change.
It's got nothing at all to do with 3rd party servers on the net caching responses.
Breaking encryption is not a DMCA violation.
Breaking encryption that controls access to a copyrighted work is what is against the DMCA.
Unless nikon is claiming copyright protection on their white balance information, it woudln't have much of a chance of winning (and it's hardly an original or creative work)
I agree with you to a point. The daycare as a business, though, has a responsibility to keep abusive people off it's staff. Not being able to hold corporations accountable for the actions of individual employees on the job is part of the reason why corporations are so hard to touch.
s/many cases/someo very specific weird cases.
I've run windows without a swapfile for years, doing a huge variety of tasks. It runs fine, and is indeed faster without swap (page, whatever).
Err, yes, it's a page file....
I've seen lots of justifications for why having the pagefile enabled is good... but in the end, if you have enough memory for the tasks you are going to perform, windows performs faster with the pagefile disabled completely.
They don't need to discuss bandwidth per customer and total numbers.. this thing can carry a payload.. which means it can carry all kinds of communications equipment, equipment which can be changed over time.
As for weight: If strong winds it it? there is very little wind, ever, at 65000 feet.
It doesn't refuel, i'ts SOLAR powered...
A vacuum only gives you something like 10% more buoyancy, but it would take more than 10% more material to make something rigid capable of holding that vacuum.. it's not worth it.
Sure, parents should be responsible.
But if AOL specifically went out of their way to make chat rooms that were SAFE for young children, by actively having people monitor them and keep them acceptable, tha'ts a selling feature to parents.
It's like if you sent your kid to daycare, and he was mistrated.. would you say to that parent "You should have been there, how dare you trust your kid to some daycare?"
At some point, AOL WAS responsible for this.
Because the fonts are part of the final work, not just used to generate it.
The excemption from distributing source for unchanged binaries only applies in a non-commercial setting, the language is specific about this.
You are correct that the output of GPL programs does not fall under the GPL, however, with fonts, we are talking about distributing the essay with the fonts, making it a derived work. You don't distribute GCC along with your code.
This is all silly though, the main point is the GPL wasn't intended for fonts or other graphic items.. it was meant for program source code. To use it in another field is to invite trouble.
But it does seem to, if you read it.
Look at it this way. The fonts themselves are the copyrighted work, the look shape and feel of them, and the source files that generate them. Using them in your own creative work makes your work a derived work.
It's not at all the same as compilinig code with GCC. The output of GPL software is not GPL itself.. but in the case of fonts, the completed work includes the fonts, in fact, is made up of them.
It sounds rediculous, right? We all agree on that, but to use that as some kind of negative aspec to fhte GPL is ludicrous... the GPL was made for source code of computer software, not fonts. Applying the language of the GPL to other domains is bound to have some caveats.
It is primarily used for voip, actually, though handles leased lines (T1, E1, etc) perfectly well with supported hardware. Everything form $20 pots cards so you can use it as an answering machine at home to multiple T1 cards are supported... and lots of voip.
You can do everything with it, but configuration is a lot of text files in true unix fashion.. it's more of a framework than a completed solution... which is what the article is about.. asterisk is really powerful, but setting up a complicated setup is sort of, well, complicated (though I find the complexity is about right for the level of flexibility)
I haven't yet seen a game since then that had the same wicked atmosphere and soundtrack all mixed together. Quake was SPOOKY cool....
What windows format would that be? Is there a common windows equivalent to garageband that comes with windows?
Such as?
It does? What percentage would that be?
I seem to recall reading that the populations of the US, Canada, and N. Korea are all about 77% urbanized.. very very similar.
In many cases it's not to get an assessment of your work.. it's to simply get an assessment of network security. It should not be taken so personally.. you should be looking forward to the results and using them to better your setup, not feeling offended that you are being judged.
- Run common tools like nessus yourself, and document the results. Indicate the false positives in a report. Indicate how real issues have been fixed. Give a copy to whoever might care.
- Don't pay third party companies if all you are going to get back is the output of nessus or some such thing. If all they are going to give you is the unverified output of open source tools, they aren't adding any value to your operation.
- If you guys are going to hire third parties, YOU, the sysadmin, be the one to initiate the process. You are also the only one qualified to interpret the results. If there are things on the list that are not valid or not high enough risk to worry about, document the fact and be done with it.
Yes, however, it appears that a great many things that were cut were very fundamental, memorable things about the book. Things that define the story outright.
Certainly, there are many things you can leave out and/or tweak and still keep the spirit of the original alive, but no towel?
It will harm the industry, if the industry doesn't change. They've had plenty of opportunity, and they certainly have the money and time to figure it out.
The problem is, they sat on their asses and whined instead of developing something new. Amateurs with home computers ended up with far better, more efficient distribution systems than the industry itself had. That there are copyright violations is a side effect of this.
The video industry is doing the same thing... look at all the HD downloads online, yet we still don't have a solid HD-media standard. There is more HD material available online than at the local video store (which has none). Problem? You bet.
Question: is anything ever broadcast in 1920x1080?
Only if it is a transaction that gives rise to a debt. If no debt is involved, then legal tender is irrelevant.
The grocery store, for instance, does not have to provide any kind of notice.. there is no debt involved.
That might be one for the lawyers. Private transactions can be in any form the parties involved will mutually accept.
legal tender only applies to contractual debts.
Whether or not this constitutes a debt might be fuzzy.. you haven't left the premesis with the product yet, so technicall the gas does not belong to you yet. They could siphon it back out, for instance.
Contrast to a restaurant, where it's definately a debt, because you have been allowed to consume the food (as well as use the service) before being charged.
legal tender applies to contractual debts.. not regular private business transactions.
If you buy a slurpee at 7-11, the law does not regulate in any way the terms of the business exchange. You can agree to pay in whatever terms the 7-11 and you agree to, be it cash, smiles, or jellybeans. THe 7-11 can insist on pennies, for sure.
The legal tender designation only applies to settling contractual debts, like when you eat at a restaurant and then they give you a bill afterwards, or when you purchase a vehicle, or a house, etc.