Slashdot Mirror


Trent Reznor Challenges Music Norms

alset_tech writes "Trent Reznor (of Nine Inch Nails) has released the new single from NIN's upcoming album as a GarageBand file for fan remixes. Though by no means the first time a major-label artist has released a track to the public for remix, this is the first time such a project has been as open to the common user. The repercussions to 'traditional' IP views in music could be beneficial to all. Note that the license agreement does not allow commercial use of the included sounds. From the download text: 'What I'm giving you in this file is the actual multi-track audio session for 'the hand that feeds' in GarageBand format. This is the entire thing bounced over from the actual Pro Tools session we recorded it into. I imported and converted the tracks into AppleLoop format so the size would be reasonable and the tempo flexible.'"

535 comments

  1. Fairplay by kunkie · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is truly playing fair!

  2. Eh, not really breaking ground. by suso · · Score: 2, Informative

    Maybe they aren't major label, but the artists on ReasonStation are pretty good and have been releasing the actual Reason music files for their tracks since around 2001. I'm sure there are many other semi-pro sites out there where people are doing this.

    1. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by mattyohe · · Score: 1

      Uhh.. If trent did everything in reason it would all sound the same... These are directly bounced from Protools.

      --
      - what is the definition of simultanagnosia?! I've been meaning to look it up!
    2. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Maybe they aren't major label...

      I think you just explained why Reznor *is* breaking ground with this experiment. The artists at ReasonStation may be fantastic, but in one fell swoop Reznor has just caused a big stir. This is specifically because he is a major-label artist, and until now big-name acts haven't done this.

      Small players are usually the ones that stir things up initially, but until big names that everyone knows get involved, John Q. Public doesn't have any idea of the possibilities.

      --
      Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    3. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Golias · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Very few ordinary folk own a copy of Reason. Like you said, ReasonStation and other sites like it are for "semi-pro" musicians.

      Garage Band 2 comes free with every Macintosh. Damn near every OS X user also owns a copy of Garage Band, even if they are not musicians, DJ's, or recording enthusiasts.

      This means that Trent Reznor has just released the bare tracks of a major-label single from a multi-platinum artist to the general consumer! High school kids lucky enough to own a $999 iBook or a $499 mini can now make their own Nine Inch Nails remix, or sample the loops into creations of their own.

      This is huge. If it catches on, it could fulfill the prediction Brian Eno once made about popular music eventually becoming user-modifiable constructs. If you can't see what a big deal this is, you are not looking with an open mind.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    4. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by greggman · · Score: 1

      Wrong!!!! Big name artists have been doing this for years. Over 7 to be exact on AcidPlanet.com. Depeche Mode, Baldwin Brothers, ... there was at least one new aritst a month if not every 2 weeks. They don't appear to run the remix contests anymore but if you search for those aritst you'll find the remixes of their music still on the site.

      I still have all the samples from the sample sets I downloaded.

    5. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you admit, your example site is semi-pro. But, in contrast, the artist Slashdot is discussing is pro. Not just a professional musician, but also a major commercial success, who's sold millions of albums and sold-out major music venues nationally. For a pro like Trent Reznor to be doing this is breaking ground. And the album single he is releasing is the same one which has been playing on MTV2 the last couple weeks. It's like he doesn't even believe in the line RIAA is trying to sell about unencumbered music downloads and sales being hurt. Or, shudder, he's not in it for the sales.* Now that would be refreshing!

      * He's in it both for the sales and making great music. But since he makes great music he doesn't have to worry about free music downloads hurting sales. They have the opposite effect.

    6. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Great. Its not bad enough that the poison negativity of Reznor has to be played over the airwaves - now everyone can download it and add their own repulsing sentiments, and all to his own promotion.
      Trent Reznor is a low example of a human being. When given the choice of using his time to spread positive ideas he instead opts to pollute the minds of people with ideas and images that are awful and grotesque. It's a shame that misery loves company.
      Selling negativity to teenagers is not high on the list of difficult endeavors, and so I have no respect for the degrading ditritus perpetually exhuding from Trent Reznor and his garage band.

    7. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Were these tracks the same as major singles contemporaneously being played on major networks, such as MTV?

      Were the tracks from just-released (or yet to be released) major commercial albums?

      (Or were they just old stuff?)

      I expect these were either formerly big name artists or obscure artists releasing either old or non-chart topping material.

      So, that would mean Trent Reznor still is breaking ground with this.

      And, if none of the above is true, he is still breaking ground just by sheer exposure of the act.

    8. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've heard of Depeche Mode, but I have no idea who the Baldwin Brothers are.

      I do, on the other hand, know who Nine Inch Nails are.

    9. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by spectecjr · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Shamen did it with Move any Mountain - they released all of their component pieces, so you could remix it to your heart's content.

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    10. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      His material has been a screen-capture of the lives of many teens in America. Life is not easy for all of us. But you clearly have not listened to any of his new material. There is a distinctly differently message there. People can and do change. So do artists and their messages. Be more open-minded. You might just be fighting against something you should be supporting.

    11. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by everett3 · · Score: 1

      Except for mine?? my computer did not come with garage band, it's a G4 1.33ghz i bought last may. not that limeiwre didn't fix my deficit though.

    12. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1

      Or you could have bought iLife 05.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    13. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by everett3 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      bought?

    14. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      iLife '05. Buy now.

      Oh, I see what you mean.

    15. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by iammaxus · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are so wrong. The number of people who will be actively modifying songs is probably about the same as the number who own a copy of Reason (I don't actually know the band or its popularity, but my point is, "very few oridnary folk" will be participating.) Trent Reznor is not really breaking ground. His user base is disproportionately high in users who like to do sound editing and that is the main reason he, and not some other musician, is doing it.

    16. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by NevermindPhreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      who?

    17. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      This is huge. If it catches on, it could fulfill the prediction Brian Eno once made about popular music eventually becoming user-modifiable constructs.

      Bah, that's nothing new. My mom used to user-modify popular music when she was growing up. She used software called "sheet music" with a hardware device called a "piano." She was even able to add her voice to the mix!

    18. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by greggman · · Score: 1

      > Were these tracks the same as major singles contemporaneously being played on major networks, such as MTV?

      Yes

      > Were the tracks from just-released (or yet to be released) major commercial albums?

      Yes

      >I expect these were either formerly big name artists or obscure artists releasing either old or non-chart topping material.

      You're desparately grasping at straws trying to justify your mistaking beliefs. Just like Trent Reznor they were for just released or just about to be released tracks and were for promotion of the music itself.

    19. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny. You have repeatedly made claims without providing any evidential support. Care to provide some examples to support your assertions.

    20. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but that was analog.

    21. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your boyfriend's semen is chunky? Get thee to a doctor.

    22. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by greggman · · Score: 2, Informative

      it's not my fault you don't know who the Baldwin Brothers are. Shall I name some other groups who's music was available for re-mix on AcidPlanet? I'm sure there's at least one or two you've heard of:

      Alex Gordon / Anevis / Baldwin Brothers Remix / Beck Remix Contest / Becky Baeling / Berlin Remix Contest / Better Living Through Circuitry / Black Eyed Peas / Blue Man Group / Boz Scaggs / Bran Van 3000 / Brookville / Bumblebeez 81 / BWB / Caroline Lavelle / chainsaws.and.children / Charlie Louvin / Chemical Brothers / Cirrus / Cirrus 2 / D:FUSE / Daisy Rock / David Bowie / De La Soul / Debra Soule / Depeche Mode / Dierdre / Fiction Plane / Frou Frou / Gene Simmons / Geri King / Groove-a-licious / Hangmen3 / Harland / Herman Brood / Holmes Ives / Illegal Substance / ILONA! / Jackyl / John Oszajca / Joshua Redman / Jungle Brothers / Kelli Ali / Kenny Garrett / kidneythieves / La mezcla total! / Lenny Kravitz / Lil Jon / Lola Dutronic / Lounge / Low Frequency Occupation / Madonna / Mando Diao / Marillion / Meredith Monk / Mint Royale / New Order / Nuendo Music Group / Oleander / Panurge / PitchShifter / Plus 8 / Richard Humpty Vission / RoninRiders / Schneider TM / Serart / Seven Heads / Slum Village / Sonata 2:49 / sonicanimation / Soren LaRue / Static-X / Steve Tibbetts / Stockhausen / Take Out Music / The HERMIT / The Project / The Real Tuesday Weld / The Sea and Cake / Thump Radio / Thump Radio 2 / Tommy Lee / Toxic Grind / tweaker / tweaker 2 / Venus Hum / WB Old Kool ReMix / Wicked Beat Sound System

      http://www.acidplanet.com/contests/

    23. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by period3 · · Score: 1
      Very few ordinary folk own a copy of Reason


      Very few ordinary folk own a Mac. That's not a troll, just a fact.
    24. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

      Apple Second Quarter Results 2005

      Apple shipped 1,070,000 Macintosh® units and 5,311,000 iPods during the quarter, representing a 43 percent increase in CPU units and a 558 percent increase in iPods over the year-ago quarter. (emphasis added)

      I am guessing Apple shipped more Mac computers last quarter than you have dollars in your bank account. The increase in CPU sales comes as a direct result of the introduction of the Mac mini. Ordinary folks are the ones buying this new computer.

    25. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What's the license?

    26. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by boodaman · · Score: 1

      Wow, you are so wrong. Trent Reznor and Nine Inch Nails have a huge following, worldwide. I'm sure there are thousands of people burning up the chatwaves right now with questions like "what's GarageBand?" and "Do you have it?" and/or "Can you get it?". Even "Does it run on Windows?" and "Do you know someone with a Mac?". Every NIN fan is going to know about this, and I guarantee you there are WAY more of them then there are people with a copy of Reason. It's a good bet, then, that there will be lots of remix activity.

    27. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Storlek · · Score: 1

      I'm sure there are thousands of people burning up the chatwaves right now with questions like "what's GarageBand?" and "Do you have it?" and/or "Can you get it?". Even "Does it run on Windows?" and "Do you know someone with a Mac?".

      I wonder how many Nine Inch Nails fans will get a Mac because of this. I imagine a decent amount of them have (or at least know a friend who has) an iPod already, and some of them might have been thinking, maybe only half-seriously, about getting a Mac mini, iBook, or something else. This might just be enough of a reason for some of them to put their money down and actually buy one.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    28. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Golias · · Score: 1

      Except for mine?? it's a G4 1.33ghz i bought last may

      In other words, almost a year ago... and about nine months before Garage Band 2 even came out.

      Fine. All CURRENT Macs come with it for free. Happy now?

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    29. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trent Reznor's been a big-time Mac fanboy going waaay back, and most of his fans know it, because he brings it up in damn near every Rolling Stone or Spin interview he gives.

      So it's a good bet that most of his fans who are likely to be moved towards buying a Mac from his endorsement, already have been.

    30. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Playing the piano well takes years of training, and is a skill which has become far, far less commonplace over the last 50 years. You can digitally manipulate music with Garage Band after a half-hour of being shown what's what.

      That's what Eno's dream was. Prepared material which a non-"musician" could use to make their own music. (I put "musician" in quotes because technically, if you are making music, you are now a musician, in the broadest sense of the word.)

    31. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Storlek · · Score: 1

      So it's a good bet that most of his fans who are likely to be moved towards buying a Mac from his endorsement, already have been.

      Maybe, except this isn't just an endorsement, but an actual product that can be used. There's a significant difference between the two: while an endorsement might get some people to switch, the reasoning is mostly "hey, Trent Reznor says Macs are cool!" This is more likely to entice the people who were previously saying "Macs might be cool and all, but I can do everything I want to do on my computer already."

      I suppose some of those people will counter with "$500 for a Mac mini is a bit pricey just to play around with that song," but then again, people also spend exorbitant amounts of money on "rare" singles and boxed sets.

      The effect it has on Apple's profits probably won't even show up in the quarterly graphs, but I wouldn't be surprised if at least some NIN fans decide to acquainted with OS X in the near future.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    32. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by pipingguy · · Score: 3, Funny


      Very few ordinary folk own a copy of Reason

      Is that why that George Bush guy keeps getting re-elected? I mean, ferchrissakes, he's up to four terms now!

    33. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by croddy · · Score: 1
      but garage band is not used by any intermediate or advanced musicians, and many musicians have migrated away from apple platforms. perhaps this is why mogwai included the instrumental tracks for their single in platform- and application- agnostic WAV format.

      and no... this isn't huge. it won't "catch on", and although Eno was ahead of his time, neither musicians nor fans want music to become a "user-modifiable construct".

    34. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by DaveJay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know you were being funny, but you were also being truthful. And the thing is, with popular music being delivered in the pre-mixed, ready-made forms that it is these days, artists who release their music files like this are -almost- bringing us back to the days of sheet music. After all, back then many more people could pick up and play a piece of sheet music; now a (likely) similar number of people can pick up and play with these files.

      So this is a good thing.

    35. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by spectecjr · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      The Shamen. Oh, sorry, you must be from America, the birthplace of all culture. Never mind.

      Do me a favor - broaden your horizons a bit.

      VH1: The Shamen
      Techno Guide: The Shamen

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    36. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      I can tell you that you're absolutely correct. I'm reasonably prominent on the NIN fan base scene (I help out at The NIN Hotline) and it took about an hour before folks had ripped it to uncompressed .wav format so that even the least able members of the NINternet (yes I know how lame that word is) could make their first attempts at remixing a song.

      There are thousands of people burning up the chatwaves right now about this. Professional musicians to 17 year old kids are interested. People who are involved in sound technology certainly doesn't have any kind of majority when it comes to Nine Inch Nails and their fan base - it's a complete myth. Same goes for the goths. There aren't as many as people think.

    37. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      Trent's been endorsing Mac products for a good 8+ years now. It's nothing new to the hardcore fans that are most likely to be influenced by his product endorsements. However, if this influences other artists to do the same...well, that's another story.

    38. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by everett3 · · Score: 0

      Sorry. I didn't mean to sound like a dick there.

    39. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Misanthropy · · Score: 1

      My ibook purchased in April '04 came with Garageband. You must have not bought from Apple?

    40. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by greggman · · Score: 1

      http://acidplanet.com/contests/

    41. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by everett3 · · Score: 0

      i bought it from the renton, wa frys

    42. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Are you implying that they use ProTools instead? Sorry, I'm easily confused.

    43. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Three terms, right?

    44. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oil r0xx0rz!

    45. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Blondie-Wan · · Score: 1

      What's the significance of the names in bold text? I don't see them bolded in the original page.

    46. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by darkgreen · · Score: 1

      wow... that's leading by example.

      Thanks.

      --
      You don't need Geeksintraining if you're on Slashdot.
    47. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

      Garage Band 2 comes free with every Macintosh. Damn near every OS X user also owns a copy of Garage Band, even if they are not musicians, DJ's, or recording enthusiasts.

      This means that Trent Reznor has just released the bare tracks of a major-label single from a multi-platinum artist to the general consumer! High school kids lucky enough to own a $999 iBook or a $499 mini can now make their own Nine Inch Nails remix, or sample the loops into creations of their own.

      This is huge. If it catches on, it could fulfill the prediction Brian Eno once made about popular music eventually becoming user-modifiable constructs. If you can't see what a big deal this is, you are not looking with an open mind.


      You are vastly overestimating the market share that Apple's Mac has.

      People are saying that Trent Reznor is breaking ground by being the first *major label* artist to do this, and I agree with this reasoning. Sure, other tiny players in the market have done it before him, but since they are not major players they're just a footnote in the broad scheme of things. Their efforts impact a small few.

      Such is the case with Apple Macs. They have less than 3% of the market. While their owners are very vocal, they are a tiny minority. 3% marketshare doesn't make you a major player. As much as people want to trash Windows, if it were to be bundled with a piece of sofware that Macs have had for years, it would be a bigger deal since it appeals to a vast majority instead of a tiny minority.

      Just as Trent's efforts impact vastly more people than the efforts of obscure artists who did it first, Microsoft's software impacts vastly more people than Apple's, even if it was available first.

      It's the impact which counts in the long run.

    48. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Bah, that's nothing new. My mom used to user-modify popular music when she was growing up. She used software called "sheet music" with a hardware device called a "piano." She was even able to add her voice to the mix!

      Bah! You kids and your new-fangled "shit music", and your fancy-schmancy "pyaners", and your crazy long hair.

      Back in my day, we banged two rocks together and howled at the moon, AND WE LIKED IT THAT WAY!

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    49. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      I think he was implying that ordinary people AreTools.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    50. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Vokbain · · Score: 1

      Depeche Mode, Baldwin Brothers, ...

      Who? I've never heard of them. I have however heard of NIN.

    51. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by chochos · · Score: 1

      I already have a Mac (2 macs, actually - an old graphite iMac and a 17" 1.5GHz PB) but I only have GB1... I want to get a new iMac soon, so this might be an excuse for it. But at least it's an excuse to get GB2 (iLife '05). Anyway I use GB for playing some ambient keyboards with my band and occasionally recording a new song, so it won't hurt to get the new version.

    52. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LOL big difference between Apple's market share and their user base. For example, I have not been a part of their market share for over 2 years, but I have a Mac and it is my main machine at home. Incidentally, I think I might become part of the market share again soon though. I needs me a dual G5.

    53. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by mmkkbb · · Score: 1

      Only on slashdot is ignorance so rewarded.

      Oh, who am I kidding? It's not just on slashdot.

      --
      -mkb
    54. Re:Eh, not really breaking ground. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you espouse the numbers, you should check to see where those macs and PCs are. How many PCs are sitting in offices, airport terminals, rental car desks, and are not in reality or practice a personal computer? Do you think any of those users are going to be doing anything with something like this on any platform? What is the ratio of macs to pcs in the home? and in the home in the U.S.? What is the ratio of average users with an interest in music that are on one machine or the other? Mac probably is not the majority, but it is a lot larger part of this pie than the "less than 3%" which isn't even accurate for their slice of the whole pie.

  3. Is this what you might call... by kenthorvath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...open source music? I wonder if it was released with a Creative Commons license.

    1. Re:Is this what you might call... by nocomment · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not it's not OSS.

      Here's the EULA when you try tomount the .dmg.

      End User License

      Please read the terms of the following software License Agreement before downloading this product. By clicking on the link below and downloading this product, you agree to become bound by the terms of the License Agreement. If you do not agree with the terms of the License Agreement, do not click the I AGREE button below. Interscope Records ("Licensor") guarantees that the downloaded product has been created and recorded specially for this project and any similarity to any other recording is unintentional.

      1. The sound samples recorded on these CDs remain the property of Licensor and are licensed, not sold, to you for use on your sampling software or equipment.

      2. A right to use the enclosed sounds is granted to the original end-user of the product (Licensee) and is NOT transferable.

      3. The Licensee may modify the sounds but MAY NOT USE THE SOUNDS, MODIFIED OR UNMODIFIED, FOR COMMERCIAL PURPOSES INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, WITHIN MUSICAL COMPOSITIONS. Licensee must obtain a separate license from Licensor in respect of any intended commercial uses.

      4. This license expressly forbids resale, relicensing or other distribution of any of these sounds, either as they exist upon downloading, or any modification thereof. You cannot sell, loan, rent, lease, assign or transfer all or any of the enclosed sounds to another user, or for use in any competitive product.

      5. Licensor will not be responsible if the contents of these discs does not fit the particular purpose of the Licensee.

      6. Use of the included sound sample in isolation such as, but not limited to, video game soundtracks (where they appear in isolation or as sound effects) is not permitted without first obtaining a separate License from Licensor.

      7. Use of the included sound samples in 'library music' (also known as 'production music') intended for commercial exploitation, is not permitted without first obtaining a separate License from Licensor.

      ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. © 2005 Interscope Records.

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    2. Re:Is this what you might call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Note that the license agreement does not allow commercial use of the included sounds."

      Are you fucking illiterate?

    3. Re:Is this what you might call... by KiloByte · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's not open source as it can't be used commercially in any way -- so it's useless for projects like Linux distributions and so on. Or even, you can't air them in a shop (at least according to Polish law).

      But, it's open for private listening, open for modifications and open for sharing. These are important freedoms, and they're not something to snooze at. Plus, making a blow against RIAA just can't be bad :p

      When it comes to Creative Commons licenses, they're way too easy to mistake one for another. The CC family of licenses provides both an open one, some "half-free" (that is, free for looking and copying) and some entirely proprietary licenses. Thus, it's better to use GPL or any other free license instead of CC ones.

      --
      The creatures outside looked from Alt-Right to Antifa; but already it was impossible to say which was which.
    4. Re:Is this what you might call... by DigiShaman · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't music used to always be open source? I seem to have forgotten. Hmm, imagine that...

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    5. Re:Is this what you might call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That didn't mean it wasn't a creative commons license (though the person who beat you with the actual EULA shows that it isn't one) since CC has a Non-commercial license for exactly this purpose. The poster may be fucking illiterate, but you seem to be fucking ignorant.

    6. Re:Is this what you might call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wow, is this the first time a EULA got modded +5?

    7. Re:Is this what you might call... by Leviathant · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hi there, just thought I'd comment on this, I run a big fat nine inch nails website... We were concerned at first about the license, especially the bit about "other distribution of any of these sounds, either as they exist upon downloading, or any modification thereof." This amounts to a cover-your-ass clause... the band and Interscope are encouraging people to remix or whatever with this file. Interscope suggested to the band that they hook up with MySpace for fan distribution of the glut of remixes that will come out, but for one reason or another, that (and the notion of doing this as a contest) didn't happen. So if you do soemthing with these files, you are welcome to host them without fear of the record label coming at you -- otherwise what would the purpose be of doing this in the first place? That being said, I have a PC, and I just extracted the AIFF files... never saw the license ;)

      --
      I am Leviathant and I approve this message.
    8. Re:Is this what you might call... by waynelorentz · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Yeah, and programs that only run on Linux aren't open source because they only run on 5% of the computers worldwide.

      You sound like a jealous Wintel troll.

      Maybe you're just angry because you're wasting another Saturday hunting down all the spyware and viruses in your Windows box instead of using your computer to do something creative.

    9. Re:Is this what you might call... by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1, Troll

      I have no spyware or viruses on either of my windows systems. I use my system for hobbyist/semi-pro video editing and I am glad I did not buy a g5 because they can only hold 2 internal hard drives. I have 4 250 gig drives in my p4 system and I built it myself with optimum fan placement and have no problems.

      Linux is not an option because they have no professional audio visual programs.

      I have made some money filming and editing wedding videos and if I had bought an expensive apple system I'd still be paying it off now instead of making a profit from my work. It just doesn't make business sense for me.

      It's too bad trent reznor hasn't released an album in 5 years and needs to stoop to being an ad boy for apple products. I remember when he was a talented rock star who could live solely off the momentum of his music. His new album sounds quite weak.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    10. Re:Is this what you might call... by myke113 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've actually been talking to a lot of musician friend's of mine about Open Source Music.. (OSM). One guitar riff could end up having 100 different versions. I would love a great open source audio program that facilitated this exchange of music tracks. This would be a great way for unknown musicians to connect to a much larger musician base than normal also.

      --

      -Myke
      myke@compassionatecoalition.org
      http://www.compassionatecoalition.org
    11. Re:Is this what you might call... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      I often mistake versions 1 and 2 of the GPL and the LGPL. The CC license is included or linked to from the distribution, so it is a fallacy to believe that because they are "easy to mistake one [another]", they are weak. I remind you, the GPL is for software.

      You know that if I want to put something into the public domain, the GPL doesn't do it for me. However, the CC Public Domain License does. To claim that because the CC does not offer a GPL-style license, it is inferior to the GPL is to use the same logic that the GPL is inferior to the CC because it does not use CC-style licensing! This is fallacious reasoning, using what you intend to prove to prove it!

      Need I remind you that the GPL is not free; it does place restrictions on a user. By definition it is not free. I like the GPL, but to claim that it is as free as, say, public domain, is fallacious.

      Because the CC provides a public domain license, it is, by definition, more free than the GPL.

      Use the license that fits the time; if you want to make something GPL, use the GPL. If you don't care to keep the improvements under your license, use something like BSD or CC.

    12. Re:Is this what you might call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That didn't mean it wasn't a creative commons license

      No, but it does mean that it can't be described as open-source, which was his primary question. Pointing out that it isn't open-source isn't ignorant at all.

    13. Re:Is this what you might call... by TheoMurpse · · Score: 1

      Scratch the "the GPL is for software" comment. I am fully aware that you can GPL non-software (docs, etc).

    14. Re:Is this what you might call... by slavemowgli · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You don't have to see the license. If you don't accept it, then it's simply a copyrighted work that you (basically) have no right to use. :)

      --
      quidquid latine dictum sit altum videtur.
    15. Re:Is this what you might call... by ivano · · Score: 1
      well it does mean that for a file download appearing on the frontpage of slashdot is for the first time downloadable.

      ciao

    16. Re:Is this what you might call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you an exhibitionist?

      Because your two posts were nothing more than public mental masturbation and I sure hope they were better for you than they were for me.

    17. Re:Is this what you might call... by nocomment · · Score: 1

      Do you have a place to store these? Ive been messing around with it and have a funky southern rock r&b-ish version complete with a horn section. :-p

      --
      /* oops I accidentally made a comment, sorry */
      /* http://allyourbasearebelongto.us */
    18. Re:Is this what you might call... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      We were concerned at first about the license, especially the bit about "other distribution of any of these sounds, either as they exist upon downloading, or any modification thereof." This amounts to a cover-your-ass clause... the band and Interscope are encouraging people to remix or whatever with this file.

      Doesn't sound like a cover your ass clause to me. Sounds like a "go ahead and play at home like you're already doing, but don't ever share anything you make with anyone else or you're guilty of copyright infringement. Same as always.

      If that's not what it is, go ahead and explain why.

      If there was a clause permitting non-commercial use and distribution, that would be something noteworthy. As far as I can see, this isn't noteworthy at all. Publishing this stuff in this format under this license looks more like sowing the seeds for some nice future lawsuits than anything else.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    19. Re:Is this what you might call... by Storlek · · Score: 1

      Sounds like you're looking for a tracker to me.

      --
      Bears don't normally eat things that talk and move backwards.
    20. Re:Is this what you might call... by Leviathant · · Score: 4, Informative
      Publishing this stuff in this format under this license looks more like sowing the seeds for some nice future lawsuits than anything else.

      You'd be hard pressed to be more paranoid about this kind of situation than me -- I was once named in a lawsuit by Universal Australia for sending someone an MP3 of a Reznor remix. (nothing ever came of it...) I also had some unhappy dealings with Trent's previous buttwipe management, but that's another story.

      I was assured that if any such lawsuit against a fan were to arise, Trent Reznor has veto power and would certainly use it. Otherwise, what's the point of doing this in the first place? Trent did not post this file just so he could get his fans sued.

      --
      I am Leviathant and I approve this message.
    21. Re:Is this what you might call... by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      I take offence at the term "fat". I prefer to think of us as "festively plump".

    22. Re:Is this what you might call... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Copyright is not a restriction on use. It is a restriction on copying.

      If you find a book or CD on the ground it is always ok to use. This is why there is a legal distinction between uploading and downloading copyrighted material without permission.

    23. Re:Is this what you might call... by mysticalreaper · · Score: 1

      That being said, I have a PC, and I just extracted the AIFF files... never saw the license ;)

      Wait, do you mean you have windows?

      When did personal computer, aka PC, come to mean windows? WTF is going on here? A Mac is a PC, a Dell is a PC, an my Linux box is a PC. Can i make use of the data on my Linux box?

    24. Re:Is this what you might call... by geoffspear · · Score: 1

      Fine. It's a regular copyrighted work that you have no right to make derivative works from. Sheesh.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    25. Re:Is this what you might call... by chochos · · Score: 1

      It's more like MS shared source license, in a way, but a little better... You can look at it, and you can modify it, and I think you can even redistribute your modified version, but you can't make a cent out of it.

    26. Re:Is this what you might call... by ShieldW0lf · · Score: 1

      Were you assured in writing? Do you pass that assurance forward to others in writing?

      If not, then the only safe assumption is that those assurances aren't worth jack shit.

      If I posted a comment that I'd been engaged in conversation with Linus Torvalds and he assured me that we could all use his code any way we saw fit, because he has veto power over GPL enforcement and would certainly use it, would you start sticking Linux code into your closed-source apps?

      Perhaps if I got my hands on a copy of that leaked windows code and posted a comment that I'd been engaged in conversation with Bill Gates and he assured me that we could all use his code any way we saw fit. Would you be reassured?

      If the legalese says "all rights reserved" then that's precisely what they are. Your assurances are not very convincing.

      --
      -1 Uncomfortable Truth
    27. Re:Is this what you might call... by abb3w · · Score: 1
      Didn't music used to always be open source?

      No. However, reverse engineering was easy, common, and acceptable.

      --
      //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  4. Audio and Apple by Azadre · · Score: 0

    Does Windows have this kind of software available? I have heard many artists(John Mayer, NIN, etc) use Garage band. Can a windows program make the cut?

    1. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Uh, you're joking right? These were all converted over to GarageBand, I seriously doubt any of these artists created any music in GarageBand. Maybe Logic Audio, ProTools, Cubase, or Sonar, etc., but not GarageBand. And with the exception of Logic Audio these are all available for Windows.

    2. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be new here. If this were released in a Windows-compatible format, it would be deemed officially "uncool" and not worthy of /.

    3. Re:Audio and Apple by antifoidulus · · Score: 3, Informative

      Uh, you don't even have to RTFA to find out that Reznor didn't use GarageBand to create the track. It says right in the blurb that the garageband tracks were exported from the ProTools project they used to create the track. GarageBand is a lot less powerful, but a lot more accessible to the common user, so thus GarageBand it is.

    4. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can pull the aif loops out if you have access to a Mac.

    5. Re:Audio and Apple by bbzzdd · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Acid Pro is the Windows equivalent of Garageband. In fact some of the guys who wrote Acid worked on Garabgeband for Apple.

      Brian "Head" Welch" (the ex-Korn guitarist who found Jesus) allegedly recorded his new album entirely in GarageBand. Maybe he will release his stuff too, being that's the Christian thing to do and all.

    6. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yes, the Windows Recorder will do just fine. Muli-track? Just start a few more instances of the program. Feedback and Distortion? Just plug the speaker-out into the record plug. I think that about covers the steps involved in making a NIN sound-a-like track on Windows...

    7. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shut the fuck up, you disgusting heathen!

    8. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, is this the Christian love I'm feeling here?

    9. Re:Audio and Apple by dsandler · · Score: 1
      Yes, the Windows Recorder will do just fine. Muli-track? Just start a few more instances of the program.
      e.g., Windows Noises.
    10. Re:Audio and Apple by chochos · · Score: 1

      Wow... I don't see how it can be performed in real time, though. The performer must be incredibly skilled with the mouse to do all that stuff (and maybe knowing every shortcut in soundrec helps too)

    11. Re:Audio and Apple by dsandler · · Score: 1
      It wasn't performed in real time. From the Winnoise FAQ:
      No, I didn't reprogram sound recorder to be able to play by itself. It is not a screen-captured movie of something that actually happenned on my computer. It is a fictional depiction of one way the soundtrack could have been generated (but wasnt).
    12. Re:Audio and Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, it's just an atheist troll.

  5. Re:What about Quarashi? by bengoerz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Though by no means the first time a major-label artist has released a track to the public for remix It's bad enough not to RTFA, but could you even bother to read the /. post itself?

  6. Re:What about Quarashi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    err... it says 'by no means the first'

  7. Cool idea by Coopjust · · Score: 1

    I like GarageBand, even though I don't own a Mac (I use them like once a week), and this is a cool idea. What about copyrights though?

    1. Re:Cool idea by remahl · · Score: 1

      Presumably the artist or his or her record company owns the copyrights. The terms under which they distribute the music can thus be determined set by them (just like the GNU GPL for example). In this case, they allow non-commercial reuse (it sounds like from the blurb, I did not RTFA).

    2. Re:Cool idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Note that the license agreement does not allow commercial use of the included sounds."

      GET THE FUCK OUT!

  8. With the death of Jhonn Balance... by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Due to the death of Jhonn Balance (Coil), Trent is going to need some new talent for the inevitable re-mix album following "With Teeth"

    --
    I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    1. Re:With the death of Jhonn Balance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How can a post's only moderation be "overrated"?

      It's very simple; Sometimes a score of "1" is overrated. Not to hard to comprehend is it?

      BTW 0 is probably overrated for this post as only numbskulls would need to read it...then again this is slashdot...

    2. Re:With the death of Jhonn Balance... by mankey+wanker · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This is probably the most insightful post in this thread. Reznor is far more interesting in conjunction with other artists, but it depends on the other artists too. Foetus has done a remix or two, but they really weren't that great (of course, Foetus is great solo - so I blame Reznor for this failure, or perhaps even for failing to recognize a mediocre Foetus effort and refusing to publish it).

      Maybe Sleazy Christopherson could imbue some remixes with the needed magic.

      Some buffoon down thread thinks the Fragile material was brilliant while I find it nearly unlistenable and very tedious.

      I give the whole new NIN nails thing a big yawn. Throbbing Gristle has already been more interesting within the last 12 mos.

    3. Re:With the death of Jhonn Balance... by Not+One+Of+Us · · Score: 2, Informative

      To be fair, Balance didn't contribute to Things Falling Apart. Additionally, Trent said in one of the Q&A's (Access) that he wasn't planning to do a remix album this time around. I hope he changes his mind.

    4. Re:With the death of Jhonn Balance... by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      From what I know, there won't be a remix album. He's already queuing up (ie: actively writing) songs for the next record.

    5. Re:With the death of Jhonn Balance... by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      Yes, Jhonn's death was very unfortunate. Although as said by other posters futher down this thread (or further up) I am a bit over nin. His newer stuff strikes me as overly emo (I miss his abuse of electronica and distorted sounds I guess).

      That said, this is an interest way to reach out to fans and boost records sale hugely.

      Maybe one of these days I'll do the same ;) (Except I give remix packs away on request anyhow, and so far haven't charged for music... :P ) But then again, I am very very very far from being popular nor am likely to sell millions of records.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    6. Re:With the death of Jhonn Balance... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      NIN hasn't done a remix til Reznor has Lil Jon at the beginning, explaining "Its a motherfucking remix"

      YEAAHH OKK

  9. nice going nin by ABCC · · Score: 1

    a step in the right direction, although until its possible to make a 'remix' that fully complies with current and/or future drm methods (ie you can remix the track but only with the soundbites we provide, not those of other tracks), i doubt this should be seen as a sign of things to come.

  10. Great idea... but how well does it carry by swilde23 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    nin_garageband.sit

    .sit!!

    Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac....

    On Topic. It would be nice to see more artists pulling "stunts" like this. I call it a stunt, because although I think it's a great idea, you don't see this kind of thing happening often. If you give your audience a chance to become part of your music, you will become all that much closer (no pun intended) with them.

    It works particularly well in the case of NIN, simply because their music handles remixes so well. I have trouble seeing anyone other then Ben Folds performing a different rendition of "Tiny Dancer". You never know though, do you. Perhaps there is some music genius out there just waiting for the right opportunity.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    1. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by rbarreira · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac....

      Care to explain why?

      --

      The AACS key is NOT 0xF606EEFD628B1CA427BEA93A9CA9773F
    2. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by ABCC · · Score: 1

      true, there have been a number of these type of things popping up lately. bands releasing free ring tones (wow) or a few tracks as free mp3s (omfg) seem to be used as hype, but i think its a bit too easy to be overly critical of such events. as for the remixing point you make, a look at the charts shows that just about any song lends itself to a cheesy dance remix :P

    3. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by swilde23 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Sorry, it was a poor attempt at sarcasm, way to early on a Saturday morning.

      Simple logic from the masses:
      1) NIN R0x0rs
      2) Trent Reznor is NIN so he is c00l
      3) Trent Reznor uses a Mac to mix his music
      4) from (2) and (3) Macs must be cool!

      Disclaimer: The author apologizes for the leet speek. It was simply used it for emphasis in portraying the "true" nature of NIN's younger fan base.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    4. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Lord+Haha · · Score: 2, Funny

      [i]"Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac..."[/i] Maybe we don't like the 1 button mouse thankyouverymuch. or iTunes support out of the box, or a more secure system, or all those pretty little extras, or ... damnit all fine I'll get a mac to you shut you up;)

    5. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Why? 'Cause all the cool kids are doing it on TV, that's why! Using a Mac? That's hot. Only dorks use Windows, it's so icky.

      K, that's enough techy-talk for now. I'm gonna go ride my Vespa up to the common and like, hang out and stuff.

    6. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by errxn · · Score: 3, Funny

      5) ???
      6) Profi...oh shit, nevermind; this is Mac culture we're talking about....

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    7. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by VoiceOfRaisin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Care to explain why?

      he said winblows! winblows!!! do you need any other explanation?? that convinced me right there!

    8. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      On first thought it might be an appeal to a higher authority.

      But secondly, it's because Reznor is a fucking god, and what he does, we all should.

      Luckily I'm ahead of the curve, since I've been a fan of NIN since highscool (oh sometimes in 95)
      and a Mac user since 10.2.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    9. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac....

      Uh yeah. Guess you missed the part where Trent is a maladjusted loner who prefers computers to bandmates because people make mistakes. Even Tori Amos, whiny singer/songwriter/composer and author of such uplifting works as Me and a Gun thinks he needs a blankie. I like[d] NIN (haven't bothered with the new stuff; with PHM, Broken, and Spiral, I don't really need more HALOs) but I don't think I'm going to pattern my life after Mister "hang me upside down wrapped in video tape like a reject from a 1980s cyberpunk movie" Trent.

      P.S. Ben Folds is amazingly whiny. BF5 was quite entertaining, though. I'd never heard of them when I saw them @ Liberty Lunch.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    10. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Public remixes happen all the time. Trent is just one of the first big artists to partake in it. Lots of indie artists release their audio tracks so others can make remixes.

      However most people use the standard and well-supported formats of .mid for sequences and wave or aiff files for the audio data so users of all systems can remix their work, and not just apple users who represent 2% of the world. Most really avid musicians use hardware samplers and sequencers anyway and not crash prone computers to make their work.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    11. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by The-Bus · · Score: 2, Informative

      This isn't a surprise. Reznor recorded [i]The Downward Spiral[/i] on a dozen or more Macs. They've been his "home studio" for well over a decade.

      --

      Small potatoes make the steak look bigger.

    12. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by cpct0 · · Score: 1

      A lot of people are using Macs for pro music, like for pro video.

      I will not enter the Holy debate though (even if I'm a Mac owner myself).

      But I wanted to share that maybe NIN can do it because it's mostly his private propriety. Most "popular" artists are under heavy contracts and under license for their life and newborn with compulsory drops of bloods and limbs, much worse than NY Times registration. And of course, these big wigs are not exactly what we might call our friends *cough*RIAA*cough*.

      The day I will see Mr. RIAA give us the _SOURCE_ of a track for free to download, I will raise my glass of wine to them, even if I'm north of the border.

      Mike

    13. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow! A fan since all the way back in 95! Just in time to get on the Closer bandwagon!!!!

      HTH, STFU, FOAD.

    14. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Uh yeah. Guess you missed the part where Trent is a maladjusted loner who prefers computers to bandmates because people make mistakes.

      So does he post on slashdot then?

      I like[d] NIN (haven't bothered with the new stuff; with PHM, Broken, and Spiral, I don't really need more HALOs)

      You really should give The Fragile a try. It's his most "musical" album yet. It's not as depressing as the other albums. Definately not just more of the same.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    15. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      .sit!!

      Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac....


      Another reason for everybody to use another compressor/archiver besides stuffit. Stuffit is one of the stupidest formats known to mankind. I love when I get one and then try to find what the hell just unstuffed from the thing. Stuffit is one of many things that kept me off of the Mac platform for years. Fortunately, they are not used that much anymore. But I still get annoyed by them from time to time.

    16. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      My my my, aren't we the angry Windows user?

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    17. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Phroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The day I will see Mr. RIAA give us the _SOURCE_ of a track for free to download, I will raise my glass of wine to them, even if I'm north of the border.

      Huh? What exactly do you mean by _SOURCE_? Original audio tracks? Well, this isn't exactly that, because the original format would be less usable by most people; this was taken from the original tracks and converted into a format that would be easier to work with (and smaller to download).

      Or do you mean sheet music? That's even less helpful to most people, especially since I'd expect a lot of what they play was never written down to begin with - certainly not the drum track, for example (even if the drummer reads off a lead sheet, that would only give him cues about where to put fills, where to change meter or tempo, that sort of thing).

      What would you say the _SOURCE_ of Michelangelo's David was? Music, like sculpture, is art.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    18. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by justforaday · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Wow, after reading through all the comments posted in response to the parent so far, not a single one pointed out the fucking obvious. THESE FILES ARE USELESS WITHOUT GARAGEBAND. If you have Garageband, you already have a Mac, and hence, stuffit expander...Yeah yeah, don't feed the trolls...

      --
      I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
    19. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1, Funny

      Actually I'm quite happy, I make a good living using windows based computers...

      I'm going to go outside now and wash my boxter s.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    20. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Chemical · · Score: 1

      Heh, uour comment reminds me of when I was in high school and listened to NIN. One night (on New Years Eve) one of my friends had taken ten hits of LSD and we were all watched Nine Inch Nails music videos. My inebriated friend had a profound revelation and blurted out, "Everybody likes... Nine Inch Nails. Everybody... wants to see Trent Reznor. Trent Reznor... is God!"

    21. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 1
      "Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac...."

      And then there's those of us who enjoy playing games on our computer.

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
    22. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      I'm going to go outside now and wash my boxter s.

      Wow, you must have a *huge* cock.

      Don't forget to wash that, too.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    23. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      can't be a great living though if you've got to wash your own car.

    24. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Most really avid musicians use hardware samplers and sequencers anyway and not crash prone computers to make their work.

      Thats changing though...the cost is so high, combined with the fact that hardware samplers are also software, and do crash as well.

      Anyway...stability isn't that much of an issue with a proper machine. I had Cubase running in my studio with VST samplers running for days on end without a hiccup. It's not an easy to move "stage system" or anything, but neither are piles of rack mount equipment and cabling.

      Most electronic musicians, and fans, while frustrated by equipment malfunction also accept it. In fact, sometimes it even adds to the whole experience. Especially in the case of crazy noisey industrial shit..

    25. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by LizardKing · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'm going to go outside now and wash my boxter s.

      You can't be making that good a living if you have to wash you underwear out in the yard. Us Unix programmers can afford to use the slot machines at the laundromat.

    26. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by unitron · · Score: 1

      I must be way ahead of the curve, then, cause I've been tired of them since early '94 :-)

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    27. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Moofie · · Score: 1

      "crash prone computers"...

      Yeah, you must be a Windows admin. Go wax your Porsche. It'll make you feel better.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    28. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      6) Profi...oh shit, nevermind; this is Mac culture we're talking about....

      Yup, it goes:

      1)Mac
      2)Profit

      There's no step three...

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    29. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by dmarcoot · · Score: 2, Funny

      distorted numbers and logical fallacy on your part.

      Mac make up more than 50% of graphic artist market. as for musicians on Macs, i bet that too is more than 2%

      windows does have 100% of the viruse market, ill give you that much

    30. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Moofie · · Score: 1

      Right, because when you bring a Mac into your house, all the Windows machines spontaneously combust, right?

      Me, I like having the right tool for the job. That means owning more than one computer. It's not like they're expensive...

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    31. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by tholomyes · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Although, interestingly, NIN has been using Macs to assemble their music since the beginning; "Pretty Hate Machine" was put together by Trent Reznor on a Macintosh Quadra back in '89.

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    32. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      Actually, a couple of posts above this one mention that there is a Windows program called Acid that can probably the GarageBand loop file format (and that the Acid developers worked on GarageBand, even). So no need to be yelling about something that isn't obviously true, and might not be true at all.

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    33. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Coryoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trent is fairly well known as a devout Apple fan. Releasing in the format he has can be seen as a deliberate act in support of Apple. There's nothing wrong with that - Trent seems to have gotten a lot out of Apple over the years (using Apples for most of his work), so there's no reason not to give something back. Besides, the aim was to release something fans could play around with (hence the use of Garageband instead of ProTools etc.) not to give professional remixers everything they want.

      Jedidiah.

    34. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by geofferensis · · Score: 1

      GoatPugSheep says: "Actually I'm quite happy, I make a good living using windows based computers...

      I'm going to go outside now and wash my boxter s."

      If you worked with Macs, it would be a 911 GT 2.

    35. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by cpct0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It is still the non mixed tracks. I call that source, much more than the mixed source, especially if you read the main story and what I replied to.

      Of course, I can describe the sound if you want to go deeper in your "source" analogy. Or I could tell you all the frequencies and harmonics that were there in a 360 degrees radius from the instrument / voice. And for digital instruments, the instrument name, manufacturer and serial number along with exactly the pressure points that were applied sampled to the latest 60th second for every button of the instrument, along with its preliminary setting up to the brand of RCA cable that was used (or the balanced cable) and length. And to go deeper we could do a Ghost in the Shell stunt and take the Ghost of Reznor and all the contributors to the track and give them to everyone to play around. Or maybe the actual quarks moving around in the studio and outside elements that would create that. Basically, I don't know what rhetorical argument you gave but it makes no sense, especially since you just have to read the context of the main story to know what I meant by source.

      From your comments, you seem to think that mixdown of a track is less of an art than the actual production of the instrument is. These are all arts. Like sound reinforcment, architecture of the room and lighting engineering does wonders to make your show more enjoyable, no matter if it's punk rock or classical music. Recoding engineers are also artists in their own domain, making progress and wanting better quality and to put the original artist's vision on the final audio medium.

      Next time you listen to your "Music" that has no boundaries but imagination and is made solely by the artists, just remember that what you hear on your prisitine CD is not reality but the reality that all those non-existent people want to give us. And without that non-existent art of sound engineering during the past hundred of years, we would still be listening to Edison's screamed-in-the-cone recordings, and not something as worked that seems as natural as we have now. Certainly the downward spiral would have had much less impact that it did, considering how worked and meticulately crafted the sound of that puppy was.

    36. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Acid doesn't natively support GB files. You can play around with the GB files and extract the AIFFs that are used in the loops and then create your own loops out of them in Acid. Its nowhere near as simple as doubleclicking the file and having everything ready to go, which is the point of the article.

    37. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by doxology · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You lose all credibility by quoting Dragostea Din Tei in your sig.

      --
      sigfault. core dumped.
    38. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Jeremi · · Score: 2, Informative
      6) Profi...oh shit, nevermind; this is Mac culture we're talking about...


      It seems reality would disagree with you...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    39. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Jeremi · · Score: 4, Funny
      Right, because when you bring a Mac into your house, all the Windows machines spontaneously combust, right?


      Actually, the Mac isn't even necessary, they do it pretty reliably on their own...


      (just kidding! hold your fire!)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    40. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Novous · · Score: 1

      >Another reason for all you Winblows users to switch a different os. If Mr. Reznor himself uses a mac....

      And the Linux ones too... hmm...

      By your logic, we should all use OpenGL because clearly our Soveriegn John Carmack uses it. While I prefer OpenGL, a celebrity is hardly a reason to do _anything_.

      Lastly, you fail to take into account that he merely _dumped_ it to garage band. He said he downsampled it from Pro Tools. Not "Garage Band," an 8-track toy. Pro Tools is available for both PC and Mac. Garage Band is made by Apple. Pro Tools is not. Do I really need to continue?

      Apples are nice. I would love to have an iBook. But _please_, don't resort to uninformed arguments to try convert people to your cause.

    41. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stuff-it expander is available for Windows.
      Why was this ignorant douchebag rated insightful?

    42. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Hell if he worked with macs, he'd be able to afford getting someone else to wash his car.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    43. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Snocone · · Score: 2, Informative

      Bzzzt ... wrong.

      It was actually done in Performer on an SE/30. Even better, their first video was produced on that same SE/30. Yep, 9" B&W screen and all.

      He didn't get a Quadra until Downward Spiral. A 950, to be exact.

    44. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fuck off Mac snob.

    45. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by darkewolf · · Score: 1
      Most really avid musicians use hardware samplers and sequencers anyway and not crash prone computers to make their work.
      Far from the case any more. More and more well known musicians are turning to using software only in the studio. From your standard electronica musicians to even rap musicians. Software has its advantages and disadvantages. And of the interviews I have read, the advantages well and truely outweight the disadvantages for these musicians.
      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    46. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by tholomyes · · Score: 1

      I stand corrected. That's the last time I trust the first Google result to jog my ancient memory.

      --
      When did the future switch from being a promise to a threat? -C. Palahniuk
    47. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If some day you have the chance to meet Trent, tell him to stop using a Windows server to host his nin.com site, unless he really wants you to keep considering him a real dork.

    48. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Trent is god. Mac users need cool reasons (apart of being anti-windows, which seems to be the most important considering that almost always, in any discusion, they end mentioning Windows with no aparent reason) to justify their choice of using Mac and not Windows or any other OS (if they have heard of any other). So, if their musical god uses a Mac, and since gods are always right, to use a Mac must be the right thing to do. Oh, I remember now that Trent was into coca and alcohol... I really hope those brainless mac users don't go so far in their adoration for Trent...

    49. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by errxn · · Score: 1

      Sure, iPods are selling like hotcakes. Too bad I wasn't talking about iPods.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    50. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by neonstz · · Score: 1

      Actually, my PC stopped working just after I ordered my Mini. Had to boot Windows in safe mode to get my pictures and mp3s.

    51. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by The+One+and+Only · · Score: 1

      (just kidding! hold your fire!)

      Hold Your Fire was by Rush, not Nine Inch Nails.

      --
      In Repressive Burma, it's not just your connection that dies. slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=314547&cid=20819199
    52. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Mac make up more than 50% of graphic artist market. as for musicians on Macs, i bet that too is more than 2%"

      I know this is a few day old topic, but yeah, the *PRO* music side is increasingly Mac.

      For instance, Apple bought Emagic a few years ago...the common word was that there were 2 PC Logic users per every Mac user. An inside source confirmed this...but the problem was more than half the PC users were using it illegally and 3/4ths of all support calls came from the PC side of things.

      As such, when Apple was looking for a Pro App, Emagic was willing to jump all over to the Apple only side and get bought out (almost everyone at the old company including the owners are now Apple employees -- I believe only the sales staff left and that was after being offered to be incorporated into the company, but into other positions as this was already covered).

      So, yeah -- on the *PRO* side of the Music Industry, Apples are well above the 50% mark. In the 'indy' market (i.e., they sell between 1 and 5000 albums in their lifetime -- we use to call these guys hobbiests as I had 4x this many people at the last concert I played -- we headlined, so it wasn't a blowback effect -- and *I'M* still a hobbiest as I have a day job...err...I hope...I called my boss a week ago and gave him an update of the software I had been working on and its still within the time frame I gave when I thought I was going to have 3rd part consultants working with me), PCs are the norm...I used a PC for years until Apple offered me a Mac for free and now I've made up for it by buying half a dozen more.

      The creative arts are the one area Apple excels at and will always focus on these. Maybe as soon as people realize their artist side of their life is as important as their business one, Apple will make some real inroads.

      Posted anonymously because I don't think I'm supposed to say anything about artist accomodation when discussing my relationship with Apple. They are a bunch of crack dealers -- the first is free and then you pay out the nose for your next hit :-)

    53. Re:Great idea... but how well does it carry by c0bw3b · · Score: 1

      OKay, that's hot. I've got an SE/30 sitting in my closet that I picked up for 5 bucks at a bargain/used junk store. Fortune and glory, here I come!

      --
      ||:|::
  11. Oh, the possibilities... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 5, Funny

    One accordian solo, coming right up!

    And now that I think about it... what sort of cowbell samples does GarageBand come with?

    --

    Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    1. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by digason · · Score: 2, Funny

      There's only one cowbell sample, and it's kind of weak. I gotta have more cowbell!

    2. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Hah! Made ya say it!

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    3. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by swilde23 · · Score: 1

      what sort of cowbell samples does GarageBand come with?

      Not enough for my taste. Definitely not enough. Cause I got a fever... you know the rest.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in the world. Those that understand this sig, and those that beat up people who do.
    4. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by statusbar · · Score: 4, Funny

      There already has been made a red-neck hillbilly banjo version of NiN's "Closer", (the "I Wanna F*** you like and animal" song). It changes the meaning completely!
      --jeff++

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    5. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      This is going to be one of those anecdotes that no one cares about, so if you aren't really bored, stop reading here.

      That song was big when I was working the Novato renfaire and we cooked up the following four lines:\

      I want to fuck you with an animal
      I want to eel you from the inside
      I want to fuck you with an animal
      My whole existence as a frog
      You get me closer to dog

      This comment brought to you by idle hands and sleep deprivation.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    6. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      have you heard the weird al song that has some of it thrown in? awesome

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    7. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Oinos · · Score: 3, Informative

      "Closer to Hogs" by Nine Inch Richards.

    8. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Are you thinking of the Richard Cheese version? Could be that Weird Al did a cover as well, but he usually avoid songs with "bad" words.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    9. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Mahou · · Score: 1

      pretty sure it was weird al, it was a mix of alternative music lyrics set to polka style snippets from the songs called... alternative polka, the 'bad' words were bleeped out with instruments

      --
      if i'm not immortal, what's the point of living?
      ...te?
    10. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 1

      "If you can't get laid
      at SCA,
      you can't get laid at all!"

    11. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Arivia · · Score: 1

      Then you should be listening to Aphex Twin, not NIN.

      --
      The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    12. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by RichardX · · Score: 1

      The Richard Cheese version is ace
      For those not familiar with Cheese, he's a guy who takes songs such as NIN's "Closer", Dead Kennedy's "Holiday in Cambodia" and Prodigy's "Smack my Bitch Up" and turns them into a sort of mellow cocktail lounge/elevator music type of thing. Highly recommended

      --
      Curiosity was framed. Ignorance killed the cat.
    13. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, you are right. Most people are cautious about this stuff because everyone falsely attributes him to a lot of parodies.

      It is really annoying to see his name appear to appear in file names/id3s on parody XYZ when it obviously isn't him. Plus once it spreads online it is hard to get people to correct the info or stop claiming it is from him.

    14. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, it rocks. I heard some of it on one of the local stations years ago, and ended up buying the album.

      Can't believe that I ended up liking all the songs on it.

    15. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      haha yeh i was saw a 'weird al' song and it was some girl singing a parody of britney spears very poorly

    16. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Nouvelle Vague are well worth checking out as well. They do Bossanova versions of alternative and new wave classics like "Too Drunk To Fuck" by the Dead Kennedys and "Marian" by the Sisters. The vocals are all done by heavily French accented female singers - on the Dead Kennedys cover the vocalist actually sounds drunk ...

    17. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by MalachiConstant · · Score: 1

      Weird Al did in fact do a parody of it in one of his "polka medlys". He just used silly sound effects to cover up the bad words.

    18. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "...a red-neck hillbilly banjo version..."

      Lemme guess - "I wanna f*** you like a relative".

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    19. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 1

      New Wave was the radio friendly style...of punk.

      --
      I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    20. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Were these the same guys that did the country medley of Radiohead songs called Rodeohead?

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    21. Re:Oh, the possibilities... by pudge · · Score: 1
  12. Bah... this isn't new. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marillion did this more than 3 years ago

  13. Got the idea from his friend by Sebilrazen · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Trent Reznor, great musician, got his idea from http://www.davidbowie.com/neverFollow/ David Bowie

    --
    "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    1. Re:Got the idea from his friend by Sebilrazen · · Score: 1

      Is that supposed to be an insult? You do know where they put dildos, right? Sounds like a good job description if I ever heard one.

      --
      "There are no facts, only interpretations." --Friedrich Nietzsche.
    2. Re:Got the idea from his friend by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

      They're actually good friends, and they've collaborated on a lot of music [Red Scab, etc] (and shows).

      Trent has also collaborated with DJ Josh Wink (Black Bomb).

      --
      Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
    3. Re:Got the idea from his friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Plenty of people [like your two dads] will purchase a dildo and then shove it directly up their ass. That sounds like a good job description to you? Ha ha, you will never know the touch of a female in your entire life.

      You will die alone.

      God bless!

    4. Re:Got the idea from his friend by evalencia1 · · Score: 0

      Or he might've gotten the idea from New Order, who did a similar thing for their song "Crystal". The components of the song were stored as separate .wav files ready for remixing in Acid or whatever software you fancied. A bit better than restricting people to just using GarageBand.

  14. Re:In other words. by King+Fuckstain · · Score: 2, Funny
    From the summary, "Though by no means the first time a major-label artist has released a track to the public for remix"

    To which you replied, " This is billed as the first time an artist has released such a track to the public for remixing, but it probably isn't."

    Hello?

    --
    Update For for the dupe. Not going well. Appreciate all the hate mail. Really encourages improvement.
  15. mnb Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Best Post Today!

    1. Re:mnb Re:Oh, the possibilities... by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Best Post Today!

      It's only lunchtime, most of slashdot isn't even out of bed yet. Give it time.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:mnb Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It matters not.

      Unless...nah... this one will win.

    3. Re:mnb Re:Oh, the possibilities... by LizardKing · · Score: 2, Informative

      On my copy of "Pull My Strings" Jello stops the intro to "California Uber Alles" and says "... we're not a punk band we're a new wave band ...". I think the point was that the major labels had taken the new wave style and manufactured a radio friendly version with a band called The Knack. That's why the chorus of "Pull My Strings" sounds like The Knack's "My Sharona", albeit with the words changed to "My payola".

  16. YAY!!! by arh9623 · · Score: 1, Informative

    Thank you Trent. This is the kind of ideas I've been waiting for. This is going to open up alot, no matter the non comericaliazion. I've never attempter to sell any of my ACID songs. More artists need to embrace this, it really reminds me of the rap/hip-hop 12" w/ the accapella and instrumential. I would love to see this branch out to non electronic musicians. Thats where the unusual loops live, mostly. Oh and BTW The Windows version is Sony's ACID and Reason, thou reason isn't exactly like it but fun on its own

    1. Re:YAY!!! by piano-in-a-box · · Score: 0

      Oh and BTW The Windows version is Sony's ACID and Reason, thou reason isn't exactly like it but fun on its own No...Reason definitely isn't like Garageband at ALL. First thing, Reason (which can be found at http://www.propellerheads.se/) is available for both Mac OS X and Windows. Secondly, it's a MUCH more professionally-oriented and capable program than Garageband. I personally find Garageband to be fairly useless for any serious production...it's a fun program, but I wouldn't want to actually use it to record.

    2. Re:YAY!!! by arh9623 · · Score: 0

      What features make it more capable? Does it support multipule recording streams(tracks)? I know I could look it up but I like to know what you think. I do know what you mean about GB and acid also, not being a pro level package.

  17. Pitchshifter did a similar thing by sielwolf · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    Back on their Infotainment disc: the last two tracks were all 123 samples used in making the album. Of course this was 1996 so there wasn't ProTools, GarageBand, or Reflex out there in the common market. Still, it was open-hooded music.

    I'm happy Trent did this. Too bad the disc is pretty underwhelming.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
    1. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 3, Informative
      Of course this was 1996 so there wasn't ProTools

      Hm, I guess I must have imagined working on a Protools III workstation in 1996 then. Strange.

      Just because it wasn't cheap enough for joe sickpack to have laying about his hard drive, doesn't mean it does not exist.

    2. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by soupdevil · · Score: 2, Informative

      I did a demo on ProTools in 1992. It was four-track. We had to rent a 1-gb hard drive -- for $100 a day.

    3. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      sielwolf: "...there wasn't ProTools, GarageBand, or Reflex out there in the common market."

      Shawn Parr: "Just because it wasn't cheap enough for joe sickpack to have laying about his hard drive, doesn't mean it does not exist."

      Between you and the guy who thinks the summary says "this is the first time anyone has ever done this" despite it saying exactly the opposite, Slashdot may have reached a new low in reading comprehension.

      Ah, who am I kidding...

    4. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you know how to fucking read? There's a goddamn prepositional phrase and a whole extra sentence in his post. I guess if you want to go fold paper tigers on your Saturday its your damn business.

    5. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      What an interesting username. Named after the band or some other source?

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    6. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by Shawn+Parr · · Score: 1
      Common market? What does this really mean? Obviously if we are talking about mixing/editing a song it probably refers to the common audio marketplace.

      Just because things cost more, doesn't mean they are not common. Quite a number of installations of Protools existed in 1996, actually a lot compared to the market's size.

      Now the market is a lot larger, so it seems like it is way more common today, when in reality it is not.

      The real difference is that Joe Sixpack does play around with audio editing now because the tools have become so cheap. This implies the market of people working/playing with audio is larger, not that the general population all play with music (from a technical standpoint, not counting playing MP3s and such) these days.

    7. Re:Pitchshifter did a similar thing by Sir+Holo · · Score: 1

      Just because it wasn't cheap enough for joe sickpack to have laying about his hard drive, doesn't mean it does not exist.
      Way back in 1996 we were pitch-shifting tracks in multitrack recordings on a Joe-sixpack budget, turning an acoustic guitar into a bass, among other things. All for the low, low price of $35 using Alberto Ricci's SoundEffects 0.9.2 shareware, plus a DSP plugin ($10?) from a fellow named Mike Norris. Producing full-length multitrack songs required stretching the hardware and software to its limits back then. Fun.
  18. Re:In other words. by thomsenb · · Score: 1

    Yeah...I was never quite clear on why NIN was on the ammo boxes.

  19. Re:Lawsuit pending by arh9623 · · Score: 0

    and no one cared, if there is a ...
    nevermind.

  20. NIN! NIN! NIN! by metalligoth · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a person into Industrial music that loves Nine Inch Nails and is big into the Apple platform, let me be the first here to say OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD! FUCK YEAH! NINE INCH NAILS FUCKING RULES!

    *faints*

    1. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      hahah. that was my reaction too :)

      i bet the PC users are pissed about this one.. i just keep going on chuckling and fooling with the song in garageband.

      --
      - tristan
    2. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 2, Funny

      FUCK FUCK FUCK FUCK YEAH!
      Fainting is an obvious sign of a rookie.
      I myself have been maintaining for the last 20 minutes.
      i can bareeley type though.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    3. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Tibor+the+Hun · · Score: 1

      I can't even bring myself to do that yet. I'm just looping it over and over, the song kicks ass.
      reznor is so cool.

      --
      If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
    4. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by kevinadi · · Score: 1

      don't forget WE'RE NOT WORTHY

    5. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      As a person into Industrial music that loves Nine Inch Nails and is big into the Apple platform, let me be the first here to say OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD! FUCK YEAH! NINE INCH NAILS FUCKING RULES!

      Do you want to fuck Steve Jobs like an animal now?

      Bow down before the Jobs you serve, you're gonna get what you deserve

    6. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Bob+The+Cowboy · · Score: 1

      really, this post could be shortened to:

      "

      *fanboygasm*

      "

      Seriously though, this is pretty cool and I wish more musicians would do something like this. There are some songs I hear where I wish I could just get the music from the song...

      Bill

    7. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      I myself have been maintaining for the last 20 minutes. i can bareeley type though.

      I for one have been drinking beer for the past few hours. A can of barley type though.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    8. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll submit your picture for the Wikipedia 'fanboy' entry.

    9. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > i bet the PC users are pissed about this one..

      no we rather play the latest games and download pirated music in spyware-infested p2p apps

    10. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      > As a person into Industrial music that loves Nine Inch Nails and is big into the Apple platform, let me be the first here to say OH MY GOD! OH MY GOD! FUCK YEAH! NINE INCH NAILS FUCKING RULES!

      If he thinks that was cool... wait'll he finds out "Head Like A Hole" was actually written about Hilary Rosen.

    11. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      Whilst the concept is nice, it'd be much better if Trent could keep to more of an electronica sound rather than wander off into emo-rock sounds. Oh well, goes to show what happens to pop bands that the media labels as 'industrial-rocks'.

      I'd be more excited if Throbbing Gristle did this, or Diamanda Galas. But that would mean a history lesson for a lot of people ;)

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    12. Re:NIN! NIN! NIN! by Zenikase · · Score: 0

      NIN is as far from industrial as you can get.

      Even in his Pretty Hate Machine days, Reznor's music was little more than a ripoff of the big EBM acts of the time (Front 242, Skinny Puppy, Front Line Assembly), only with more conventional song structures for greater mainstream accessibility.

  21. Re:In other words. by bilbo47 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Gadzooks man! Have you not heard of "The Fragile"? A two CD set, mixed perfectly from start to finish, that spent a lot of time on the music charts, many singles on the radio stations, really cool music videos, an extensive world tour, and a resulting 2 disc concert DVD which came in Dolby 5.1 and DTS format. The DVD is by far, one of the most amazing music-based DVD's I own -- very good production quality. Even people who don't like Nine Inch Nails appreciate the DVD when I show it to them :)

  22. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They were Nine Inch Nails for your Nailgun, remember?

  23. Slash Dot Challenges Hyper Boleee by realitybath1 · · Score: 0

    And looks for a new word to go beyone that minor league level of exaggeration.

    Because if its done by somebody with a BIG NAME, it is always groundbreaking.

    It looks like his site isn't hyping it obscenely beyond reason though. More like:
    "Here, have this. 'Been wanting to do this for awhile. Have fun with it".
    Oh, wait aminute, now I see it - that ain't hyperbole, its the darned truth:
    BREAKING NEWS: MUSICIAN ACTS LIKE NORMAL PERSON!!!

  24. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was ammo for the nailgun. The nailgun fired ... wait for it ... nine inch nails.

  25. Re:Many Thanks to Trent and his PR Agency by BorgCopyeditor · · Score: 1
    Trent Reznor Releases Three Guitar Riffs as Halo 2 Weapons.

    *wistful*: Yeah, those are some killer licks.

    --
    Shop as usual. And avoid panic buying.
  26. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    To expand on the other comments, it's because Trent Reznor volunteered to do the soundtrack for free (Quake wasn't originally going to have a soundtrack). They decided they'd give him some free publicity in return.

  27. Marillion? Not only that.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

    Not only that, Marillion did the album "marillion.com" way before everyone started to think it was cool to ".com " just about everything. They're ahead of the curve. (can't help but mention that Marillion is much better than Trent musically, but that is just opinion)

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Christ, what is this, LUGRadio? ;)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    2. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      Can't say I'd ever heard of that radio station before. Does it play a lot of Marillion? (I did google it, but it only mentioned Linux stuff).

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    3. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by aftk2 · · Score: 1

      Hah! Never thought I'd hear Marillion mentioned on Slashdot. Anoraknaphobia has actually been getting a lot of play on my iPod recently. I was impressed by that album because it was there first that they did without their major label backing, with hardcore fans basically prepaying for the chance to listen to it.

      --
      concrete5: a cms made for marketing, but strong enough for geeks.
    4. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      It's a Linux-themed podcast. One of the participants is somewhat obsessed with Marillion ergo the joke. Obscure, sure, but at least it gave me a break from making DreamTheater jokes. ;)

      --

      You are not the customer.

    5. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by EvilStein · · Score: 1

      And after seeing both acts live, I think that Marillion is a far better live act.

      NIN started boring me years ago.

    6. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1

      Getting way off topic: is Dream Theatre any good?

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    7. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by AtariAmarok · · Score: 1
      "Hah! Never thought I'd hear Marillion mentioned on Slashdot. Anoraknaphobia has actually been getting a lot of play"

      I'm actually rather out of date on Marillion: "Season's End" is the last one I heard! On your recommendation, I downloaded Anaroknophobia off Napster II. South Park Kenny's all over the cover! Am listening now.

      --
      Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    8. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by dhakbar · · Score: 1

      No.

    9. Re:Marillion? Not only that.... by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      Actually, I like their music, but the voice of their lead singer grates on me. His voice is to "technically perfect" as to prevent anyone understanding what he's saying. Typical DT lyric:"aaabbingaa hwaaaaaaaaayayaa hhhoooooohuuuuuuhhhhhh. . ."

      --

      You are not the customer.

  28. Shameless Plug by Moderator · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Since we're on the topic of shameless plugs, I might as well link to DGuitar, a Guitar Pro style program written in Java. I use it on my FreeBSD system to read .gp3,.gp4 files. The project is only a few months old but already has the ability to read the files and play them in MIDI.

    --
    The World is Yours.
    1. Re:Shameless Plug by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Cool link. I've been getting frustrated lately because loads of tabs are now written in the Guitar Pro format, and I wasn't aware of an open source program that could display them.

  29. The inevitable question by Limburgher · · Score: 2

    Are there any F/OSS apps we non-Mac users can use to play with this? I'm a HUGE NIN fan, but I don't use Macs. Nothing wrong with them, I just have tons of legacy hardware. Still, major kudos to Trent for giving us such a gift.

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:The inevitable question by droleary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm a HUGE NIN fan, but I don't use Macs. Nothing wrong with them, I just have tons of legacy hardware.

      Dude, you want to do real-time, multi-track audio editing on over 5 year old machines? Good luck with that! Your problem lies with Moore, not with Macs. And if you do have newer x86 machines then, yes, you apparently do think something is wrong with Macs.

    2. Re:The inevitable question by delire · · Score: 4, Informative

      legacy hardware aside you might get some mileage out of this:

      http://ardour.org/ it's about to go 1.0 any day and has served me well. Linux for now, soon OSten.

    3. Re:The inevitable question by cpct0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You'll have problems if you got something else that Mac OS X to get the file.

      First it's compressed in .sit (that's no problem since Stuffit Expander is available for PC)

      But then, the file is actually a disk image (.dmg) ... so you really need mac os x to open this one up.

      Finally, you will have all the files in audio format inside the dmg.

      I tried dmg2iso on pc as a challenge (I have a Mac too) ... but it would not let it convert. So tough luck I'd say.

      Sowwy!

      Mike

    4. Re:The inevitable question by mystik · · Score: 1

      The samples are AIF format inside the archive (inside a DMG file).

      Audacity is a fantastic quick-and-dirty multitrack editor, but you'd have to reassemble the samples, I don't think there's a converter. It's a wxWindows app, so it's gui is the same across unix/x11, mac & windows.

      Ardour for linux is more pro-strength, but the same problem exists -- you'd have to convert the tracking by hand.

      --
      Why aren't you encrypting your e-mail?
    5. Re:The inevitable question by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Dude, you want to do real-time, multi-track audio editing on over 5 year old machines? Good luck with that! Your problem lies with Moore, not with Macs.

      I've done realtime multitrack recording (not very demanding though, between 5 and 10 tracks) with a P2-350 using Ecasound on Linux. It runs on the command line, so it takes up relatively little resources. For non-realtime editing I use more fancy graphical editors.

      And if you do have newer x86 machines then, yes, you apparently do think something is wrong with Macs.

      I think something is wrong with

      • machines that come with a proprietary commercial OS, when there are free and Free alternatives that do the job just as well
      • expensive machines, when there are cheaper machines available that have the same capabilities.
      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    6. Re:The inevitable question by OmniVector · · Score: 2, Funny

      so using entirely free tools you can import your photos off a digital camera, create a photo album, play background music for it, and burn a dvd of it with menus and transitions in less than 10 minutes? that's some great free software you have there.. please tell me where to get it!

      look you get what you pay for: advanced software that works a lot better together than ANY free or pay-for equivalent on the market. and as part of that software, you're required to buy hardware that's designed for it. *gasp* software designed to work with other software, running on hardware designed to run that software?! god forbid we have seamless and flawless integration and then have to pay for it.

      --
      - tristan
    7. Re:The inevitable question by Raelus · · Score: 1

      "hardware designed to run that software"
      Well, I guess Linux doesn't work on my system, since it was designed for windows. My OS is dying from your ghastly logic! The screams!

      --
      "It is the stillest words which bring the storm. Thoughts that come with doves' footsteps guide the world."
    8. Re:The inevitable question by kisielk · · Score: 1

      Funny, I could swear I was using Cubase for real-time multi-track audio editing 5 years ago on my x86 without any problems. I guess helping my friends record their demo album then was all a dream.

      I like Macs and all, but sometimes you rabid fan-boys really do over-exaggerate the situation.

    9. Re:The inevitable question by Mojo+Trolljo · · Score: 1
      Are there any F/OSS apps we non-Mac users can use to play with this?

      Likely possible through some indirect manner and some additional work. I don't know garageband, but I suspect it can export individual tracks to mp3, etc. Get someone to do this, and re-assemble the tracks in an Audacity project.

      This is really interesting in terms of possibilities. Imagine having some Qt type license for music where if you released a song under this license, another artist could modify it freely and redistribute it provided they also have it in the same multi-track format for future revision. Open music. Collaboration by anyone.

      --
      This post was made by I, Mojo Trolljo, for you to read that was written by I who is Mojo Trolljo!
    10. Re:The inevitable question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I tried dmg2iso on pc as a challenge (I have a Mac too) ... but it would not let it convert. So tough luck I'd say"

      Isobuster opens this ext, its free (as far as I know
      dont hold me to it) download at www.smart-projects.net/isobuster/ not sure if the format the actual samples are in can be opened on a pc but you can extract em at least.

    11. Re:The inevitable question by rmart · · Score: 0

      Although it's distributed as .sit and the package is a .dmg, the loops are normal AIFF files. I did my remix with Ableton Live; Garageband is terrible :)

    12. Re:The inevitable question by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Dude, you want to do real-time, multi-track audio editing on over 5 year old machines?

      Why not? I was doing it over 5 years ago.. what's changed?

    13. Re:The inevitable question by droleary · · Score: 1

      Funny, I could swear I was using Cubase for real-time multi-track audio editing 5 years ago on my x86 without any problems.

      Unless that 'x' in x86 was a 4, you can hardly qualify your experience as using legacy hardware. I don't know jack about Cubase, but a quick search turns up this version, which states a Pentium requirement that was mid- to low-range at the time, not horribly outdated. And if that bare minimum is what you used, yes, I imagine you were swearing quite a bit.

      I like Macs and all, but sometimes you rabid fan-boys really do over-exaggerate the situation.

      Exactly where was I being a fan-boy; when I suspected he might actually have a legitimate reason to dislike the Mac? Exactly where was I exaggerating; when I said that running current software on ancient hardware is a bad move? It undermines your position when you try to make a personal slam about statements I never made.

    14. Re:The inevitable question by droleary · · Score: 1

      Why not? I was doing it over 5 years ago.. what's changed?

      What changed?!? I didn't mention Moore for nothing! The issue is not that you were doing task X in year Y, but that you were doing it with Y - 5 hardware. The use of 'legacy' was his, not mine, and I think I was generous to make just 5 year old hardware qualify.

    15. Re:The inevitable question by norkakn · · Score: 1

      soon OSten?

      Please? I thought that they were morally opposed to doing a mac version. I would love for one to come out though. Audacity does most of what I need, but I would like some of the Ardour features and tho I code some, I haven't the time or skill to port it.

  30. .sit sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking as a lifelong Mac user... I hate the .sit archive format. StuffIt Expander has had it's day, and it ended when OS X came out. The .dmg and .zip formats are built into the OS (both creation and extraction), and they are faster and more reliable (and .zip is cross platform to boot, although the default OS X zip engine doesn't support things like password protection unfortunately.)

    1. Re:.sit sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      bz2, that is all.

    2. Re:.sit sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's actually a DMG inside the fucking .SIT file, for some bizarre reason.

    3. Re:.sit sucks! by syd2000 · · Score: 1

      The DMG was probably used to automatically show the EULA (when you mount the disc image).

    4. Re:.sit sucks! by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a lifelong Mac user... I hate the .sit archive format. StuffIt Expander has had it's day, and it ended when OS X came out. The .dmg and .zip formats are built into the OS (both creation and extraction), and they are faster and more reliable (and .zip is cross platform to boot, although the default OS X zip engine doesn't support things like password protection unfortunately.)

      Agreed! We should see more .dmg.bz2 downloads, and fewer .sit.hqx downloads. I actually saw a .dmg.hqx the other day; I was appalled.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    5. Re:.sit sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but you can compress Disk Images (DMG) and have them display the EULA at the same time, so I don't quite understand why the only file in the .SIT Archive was a compressed DMG. It's like zipping your rars and equally weird stuff you used to only see in the Warez Scene.

    6. Re:.sit sucks! by syd2000 · · Score: 1

      Like "SerialSurfer-1995full.rar.sit.hqx.uue"?

  31. Another First by malraid · · Score: 5, Informative

    This guy was the first big artist to record the soundtrack for a computer game (remember Quake 1?)
    Now he's the first one to release a song as a GarageBand file.
    He brought industrial music (or something like this) into the main stream.
    Be brought forward some new huge bands like Marylin Manson and Filter (I'm not arguing if they're good or bad)
    But he is just going to release his fourth album in almost 20 years of career.
    There's even a WHOLE movie that's based off the images of the video for "Closer" (Ok, so the movie sucks and the video wasn't Trent's work, but still)
    For me, this guy is the most influential musician of the last 15 years.

    --
    please excuse my apathy
    1. Re:Another First by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      He brought industrial music (or something like this) into the main stream.

      I would argue that Ministry did this before NIN (while Trent and Al work closely together on multiple projects...)

      Ministry's "Jesus Built My Hotrod" single (1991) was the biggest selling single in the year of it's release. This is long before Closer (off of The Downward Spiral - 1994) began to gain momentum with the club crowd.

      Having said all that, both NIN and MINISTRY rock. If you like their music though - check out some others:
      :Wumpscut:
      Rammstein
      KMFDM
      Front Line Assembly
      Skinny Puppy
      Funker Vogt
      Front 242

      There are many more, for a great sampling try the streaming industrial audio found here:
      http://www.detroitindustrial.org/

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    2. Re:Another First by Moderator · · Score: 0

      Mustaine did Duke Nukem 3D, which came out months before Quake.

      Mustaine/Hetfield style riffing could be found in the original DOOM game (Killing is My Business/Master of Puppets).

      HTH.

      --
      The World is Yours.
    3. Re:Another First by malraid · · Score: 1

      "Pretty Hate Machine" came out on '89, and was expressly recommended by Axl Rose (at the time when Gn'R was at the top and everyone listened to what he said). I would think that "Head like a hole" would qualify like a main stream hit. But you're right, Ministry is a big part of "mainstream industrial" also, but I don't dig Ministry that much, I've only got Psalm 69. Thanks for the recommendations, I have at least some music by all of them (Skinny Puppy is the best IMHO). Have you heard Velvet Acid Christ? Hanzel und Gretyl?
      Not very often do we get an industrial discussion in /.

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    4. Re:Another First by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      Velvet Acid Christ is great, I have not heard Hanzel und Gretyl yet - I will look them up.

      IMO, the best Ministry album came out in 1988, which is often credited as the first industrial album, or at least, Ministry was the first industrial group. (Ministry started in 1981, but did not really become industrial until "Twitch" (1986), however, that album is barely industrial, and really just a little "electronic".)

      The Land of Rape and Honey is really where Ministry took off, it is a great piece of work. The album after that, The Mind is a Terrible Thing To Taste is an excellent work as well.

      If you dont have those two albums by Ministry, you are missing out on their best stuff. Some of the newer albums are good, but the Middle albums (Not including Skidoo23:Psalm 69) are not so great, but his style has come full circle with his latest release.

      I got Land of Rape and Honey when it came out in 88. Ironically, I got it because a friend borrowed a cassette from a Ministry fan, and brought it to me with the words: "Listen to this track - this is the worst music I have ever heard."

      It was of course the first industrial I had ever heard, and I ran out and bought the album!

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    5. Re:Another First by barks · · Score: 1

      For me, this guy is the most influential musician of the last 15 years.

      Yup...and sadly I think I'm among the many that only knows that "F*ck you like an animal" song. I probably have listen to a trillion of their songs and not realized it...the tragic case of several bands in the '90s all trying to sound the same...they indeed succeeded.

    6. Re:Another First by malraid · · Score: 1

      From what I've read, the first Industrial band was Throbbing Gristle. In fact, they setup a label named Industrial Records, that's where the name comes. And that was in 1975. Their music is barely listenable to. It weird, bizzare, too experimental. Same as other groups of the time like Cavaret Voltaire and Foetus. Really weird stuff, that's "classic industrial" from what I've read.

      In regards to Hanzel und Gretyl, give it a try, it's like cross between NiN and Rammsteint (they're from NY but sing in german) They have satirical twist also, and they throw bad sci-fi from the 50s in the mix. Two of their albums that I would recommend most are "Transmissions from Uranus" and "Ubber Alles"

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    7. Re:Another First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're kidding. Influential? Nobody fucking sounds like NIN, Reznor's a joke. If we lived in an alternate universe where industrial-pop was popular, maybe you'd have a case.

    8. Re:Another First by zoeblade · · Score: 1

      Be brought forward some new huge bands like Marylin Manson and Filter

      Interesting. How did he help out Filter? I know that with Marilyn Manson, he signed them to his label, produced their first few albums to get that distinct NIN-like sound, and even played the Mellotron on Antichrist Superstar. That's a pretty big break he gave them!

      There's even a WHOLE movie that's based off the images of the video for "Closer"

      Which movie's this? I'm curious now.

    9. Re:Another First by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Interesting. How did he help out Filter?

      Trent Reznor "helped" Filter by falling out with his guitarist on the Broken tour. The guitarist in question was Richard Patrick who then went on to form Filter.

    10. Re:Another First by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

      "For me, this guy is the most influential musician of the last 15 years."

      haha, no no
      Guys like Chuck Schuldiner of Death, Muhammed Suicmez of NEcrophagist, THOSE guys are influential musicians, pushing the envelope of music and instruments.

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    11. Re:Another First by Mr.+Flibble · · Score: 1

      Yes, you are correct. I had forgotten about Throbbing Gristle.

      Sounds like Hanzel und Gretyl is like Wumpscut... I will check them out! Thanks!

      --
      Try to hack my 31337 firewall!
    12. Re:Another First by Kesh · · Score: 3, Informative
      Which movie's this? I'm curious now.

      Well, that depends on what he's meaning. There's Closure, a two VHS set that came out a long time ago. There was supposed to be a DVD release this year, but it's been indefinitely shelved due to debates between Reznor and the label.

      What he was probably talking about, though, is Broken, a movie where a young man is kidnapped, tortured and forced to watch NIN videos. It was produced by Reznor and features a performing S&M artist named Bob Flanagan. It was never officially released, and the video for "Happiness in Slavery" (taken from this movie) was banned from MTV. You can, however, download the video to HiS on the official NIN site.

      Rumor has it that the movie was intended to be included in the DVD release of Closure, but we won't know until that project gets back on track.

    13. Re:Another First by malraid · · Score: 1

      Regarding Filter, Richard Patrick got serious air time during the "Pretty Hate Machine", even though he only played on the tour (since as is widely known, Trent makes his albums pretty much alone). I'm sure that being in the "Head like a hole" video didn't harm his career. On the movie, the one I'm speeking about is "House on Haunted Hill" features several scenes that are pretty much copies of the closer viedo, for example the one with a guy with googles hanging from the ceiling. The whole atmosphere is just like the video also.

      --
      please excuse my apathy
    14. Re:Another First by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      This guy was the first big artist to record the soundtrack for a computer game (remember Quake 1?)

      Eh...any claim about the first "big" artist to do something is fairly underwhelming, as always there were a number of "small" artists who did it long before.

      Now he's the first one to release a song as a GarageBand file.

      Again, many other artists have done similar things in other format / for other programs. Nothing new here...

      He brought industrial music (or something like this) into the main stream.

      Very short-term memory. Bands like Kraftwerk and some of the bands to follow New Wave in the 1980s did this much more significantly...

      Be brought forward some new huge bands like Marylin Manson and Filter (I'm not arguing if they're good or bad)

      But you should (argue if they are good or bad)...there's nothing impressive about a bad band. MM is only well known because they were the first band to sign to TR's new label, when TR was still an active and visible performer. Whoever he had signed first was garaunteed to suceed.

      But he is just going to release his fourth album in almost 20 years of career.

      Which is ridiculous with the extremely large gaps between releases...

      He made 2.5 good albums, and a bunch of remixes of that small amount of material, and coasted on it for years and years and yaers. I LOVE his first albums. Absolutely. They were great. But when you do nothing for half a decade after that, and then come out with something that is just mediocre...eh.

      There's even a WHOLE movie that's based off the images of the video for "Closer" (Ok, so the movie sucks and the video wasn't Trent's work, but still)

      Well: a) as you admit, it's not TR's work...b) you admit that it's bad...and c) it's not even remotely original...Hell, Michael Jackson made a long movie for Moonwalker.

      So what's your point here?

      For me, this guy is the most influential musician of the last 15 years.

      How on earth could you think so? I can name dozens of other artists more influential on other artists and the music industry (for example: Tori Amos...she pretty much *made* a genre feasible for many to follow after her). I can name dozens of artists that have been more innovative (for example, Brian Eno, Peter Gabriel, and David Bowie). I can name dozens of bands that has sold more albums by orders of magnitude. And so on and so on...and any genres of music that he could've possibly been classified as in the past, have changed unbelieveably much such as to not even be really applicable anymore...

      So what has TR done that's so influential? Made 2.5 good albums, and then just wandered off to do next to nothing for years and years...how is that influential?? Lots of people haven't even heard of NIN nowadays, which admittedly is sad, but hardly influential.

    15. Re:Another First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tori Amos...she pretty much *made* a genre feasible for many to follow after her

      Sure, and the whole world suffered through the likes of Fiona Apple.

      for example, Brian Eno, Peter Gabriel, and David Bowie

      Note that the poster said "in the last 15 years" -- none of these guys have done much terribly interesting stuff in the last 15 years. And what good stuff they have put out pales in comparison to what they put out years earlier.

      Made 2.5 good albums, and then just wandered off to do next to nothing for years and years...how is that influential??

      The Velvet Underground made 2.5 good albums, and I doubt you could call them anything but influential.

      Portishead made 2.5 good albums and vanished off the face of the earth (and have been rumored to be recording another album for the last seven years) -- again, incredibly influencial.

    16. Re:Another First by Murphy+Murph · · Score: 1

      Uh, the movie (House on Haunted Hill) and the video (Closer) both draw from the same source...Joel Peter Witkin.

      --
      I dub thee... Sir Phobos, Knight of Mars, Beater of Ass.
    17. Re:Another First by mushroom+blue · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Death really only influences a very small subset of death metal bands, especially those that gravitate towards (and draw from) the Florida Death Metal scene. Their small foray into progressive experimentation, and later return to technical death metal (which was very overrated) isn't exactly the best resume to declare Schuldiner as influential as, say, Kerry King of Slayer (whose fingerprint is evident in nearly every genre of metal), or even John Petrucci of Dream Theater. This is not to say that Chuck Schuldiner, or Muhammed Suicmez (who is essentially Yngwie Malmsteen doing death metal) were in any way untalented; simply that they aren't as influential as you say they are.

      especially when being compared to Trent Reznor.

      he's not exactly the father of industrial music (that label could either be attributed to any member of Throbbing Gristle or Al Jourgensen), but Reznor done more to push the genre into mainstream. his influence on most popular music (good or bad) has been striking; everyone from Nu Metal staples to Emo/Screamo kids list NIN as one of the main musical influences. most contempory mainstream metal bands (Killswitch Engage, Cradle of Filth, etc) will tell you they have a large NIN collection. I even read Flea from Red Hot Chili Peppers list NIN's "The Fragile" as one of his top 10 albums of all time.

      This is what differentiates Reznor from the two you have listed: Reznor transcends boundaries of genre. he may not have the most complex melodies, but his style is unique. even if Suicmez is satisfied with his new band, he'll never be accessible enough to truly further music.

    18. Re:Another First by mushroom+blue · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Very short-term memory. Bands like Kraftwerk and some of the bands to follow New Wave in the 1980s did this much more significantly...

      he did mention the last 15 years, so since 1990 or so, Kraftwerk hasn't done anything particulary influential. hell, Gary Numan has been more influential in that time.

      Kraftwerk (and most 80's new wave) was only really responsible for the EBM branch of industrial music anyway. the rest took what they liked, and moved on to a harder sound.

      MM is only well known because they were the first band to sign to TR's new label, when TR was still an active and visible performer. Whoever he had signed first was garaunteed to suceed.

      yeah, because we're all hearing a lot from Godhead these days. for every Eminem or Marilyn Manson, there are first bands that blow real hard.

      this brings up the next point: Marilyn Manson only gained his initial exposure due to Reznor. if what you said was true, then Manson would have stopped selling records after Antichrist Superstar (which was the last record Reznor had anything to do with). the fact that Marilyn Manson is still able to pump out a multi-platinum record pretty much negates your theory.

      Which is ridiculous with the extremely large gaps between releases...

      apparently, your idea of influence and importance is the ability to create and move product as fast as possible. lemme know how your collection of "influential" backstreet boys albums are doing.

      He made 2.5 good albums, and a bunch of remixes of that small amount of material, and coasted on it for years and years and yaers.

      2.5? this means you're not counting "broken" as an album (which is complete crap. it stands quite well on its own), and you're probably one that couldn't wrap your head around The Fragile. but that's allright, you're bringing up the "lack of material" red herring again. nevermind that there are seventeen releases from the band...

      how many solid albums did Led Zepplin make?
      how many albums have Tool released?
      how many albums did Jimi Hendrix release?

      the answer is: "not very many". productivity does not equal brilliance.

      Well: a) as you admit, it's not TR's work...b) you admit that it's bad...and c) it's not even remotely original...Hell, Michael Jackson made a long movie for Moonwalker.

      a) House on Haunted Hill is someone shamelessly stealing from Mark Romanek's visuals.
      b) it's not bad because it's derivative. it's bad because of execution.
      c) Trent Reznor didn't have anything to do with it, so comparing it to MJ's movie is sorta pointless.

      How on earth could you think so? I can name dozens of other artists more influential on other artists and the music industry

      really? so most Nu Metal, Emo, Hardcore, Stoner pop (Incubus/Red Hot Chili Peppers), industrial metal (Rammstein, etc), and even Mall Punk (Sum 41, Blink 182) would list someone else more influential than Trent Reznor? I highly doubt it. many are more innovative, but most aren't anywhere near as influential anymore.

      So what has TR done that's so influential? Made 2.5 good albums, and then just wandered off to do next to nothing for years and years...how is that influential??

      hrm. 17 releases, all of high quality. multiple movie scores (Lost Highway, 1 Hour Photo, Natural Born Killers). multiple game scores (Doom 3 - score is available online - and Quake). responsible for many other musicians making it big. responsible for the sound of many different genres.

      yeah. I'd say that's fairly influential. in fact, that's almost David Bowie levels of influence. and he thinks Reznor is influential as well.

    19. Re:Another First by TechnologyX · · Score: 1

      Very well put, if I had mod points I would bump you up.

      Something that I and a lot of people in the death metal genre are guilty of is kind of a 'blinder' effect. Chuck Schuldiner, Muhammed, Yngwie, Michael Romeo et al are what influences our genre, and it's kind of hard to step out of it for a minute and look at more mainstream alternatives. I for example play lead guitar in a technical metal band, and while I like NIN's music and respect Trent's talent, I don't view him as an influence because he doesn't affect my music at all.

      Thinking about what you said though, you're definitely right about Muhammed, and even Yngwie and some of the other insanely talent guitar players, they just aren't accessible to a mainstream push. Which, is good, but is also bad at the same time. I don't know how I would feel about Hot Topic selling Necrophagist shirts :P

      --
      Slashdot sucks
    20. Re:Another First by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      Kraftwerk (and most 80's new wave) was only really responsible for the EBM branch of industrial music anyway. the rest took what they liked, and moved on to a harder sound.

      Hardly. Almost all industrial bands, when asked their influences, have one band that is almost always listed: Kraftwerk. There are other bands that are frequently named, but none that receives more note than Kraftwerk. I don't even like Kraftwerk all that much, but *that* is the definition of influential. And let's not forget Skinny Puppy, Throbbing Gristle, and others...*they* were influential.

      the rest took what they liked, and moved on to a harder sound.

      Again...the *definition* of influential...

      yeah, because we're all hearing a lot from Godhead these days. for every Eminem or Marilyn Manson, there are first bands that blow real hard.

      You take something I said, and twist it into something I didn't. Did I *say* all first signed bands?? Nope!
      And, as for MM, it was just the right place and time for TR to start a label. *That* is half the story of MM's success.

      this brings up the next point: Marilyn Manson only gained his initial exposure due to Reznor. if what you said was true, then Manson would have stopped selling records after Antichrist Superstar (which was the last record Reznor had anything to do with).

      Again, you put words in my mouth I didn't say. Did I say TR's involvment with the band while recording was the secret of MM's success?? Again, nope! What I *did* say, is they were there at just the right time to receive a massive media blitz propelling them further than, well, they ever should've. And as for how they've managed to continue to sell albums...

      the fact that Marilyn Manson is still able to pump out a multi-platinum record pretty much negates your theory.

      Again, hardly. The music industry is all about business, and next to nothing about quality or creativity. It is planned, constructed, and created to craft what will sell and win it will sell. You throw enough marketing dollars behind even the worse band ever made, and they *will* sell millions upon millions of records. Why? Because you pay radio stations, CD stores, etc. to play their albums, and *whichever* album is being played is garaunteed to sell copies, regardless of what it is. (don't even get me started on payola)

      Additionally, another marketing masterpiece is that such bands can collect a "momentum"...once you get them going, if you do it the right way at the right time, they can keep afloat on their own...on their *past* success and their convinced "fans".

      The other half of MM's success is the same as why you know Dennis Rodman's name over most other basketball players of the same skill...

      apparently, your idea of influence and importance is the ability to create and move product as fast as possible. lemme know how your collection of "influential" backstreet boys albums are doing.

      LOL! You are even hypocritical as well. First you say seem to point out some quality of MM's record sales, then you turn around and accuse me of doing just that! It's one or the other..

      Best part is, yet again, I didn't say that..you continue to put words in my mouth, so I won't bother with the rest...

    21. Re:Another First by stang · · Score: 1
      how many solid albums did Led Zepplin [sic] make?

      Nine in 11 years ('69 to '80). I'll call it 12 years if you agree to count Coda, so it's 10 in 12. And yeah, there's a 2-disc live album in there, but Physical Graffiti is two disks, too.

      And not a bad disk in the bunch.

      And every disk has its own unique sound.

      --
      "200 Quatloos on the newcomer!" "300 Quatloos against!"
    22. Re:Another First by ruiner13 · · Score: 1
      "But he is just going to release his fourth album in almost 20 years of career."

      Hmmm... let me see. Singles/remix albums are shown as sub-items.

      1. Pretty hate machine
        1. head like a hole
        2. Sin
        3. Down In it
      2. Broken / Fixed (i consider them related)
      3. Downward Spiral
        1. closer to god
        2. closer: further away
        3. march of the pigs (2 disc)
        4. further down the spiral
        5. perfect drug versions
      4. The Fragile (2 discs)
        1. the day the world went away
        2. things falling apart
        3. we're in this together
        4. still
        5. and all that could have been (live)
      5. With Teeth (in a few weeks)
        1. the hand that feeds (out on tuesday?)

      Videos:

      1. Closure
      2. And all that could have been

      Soundtracks:

      1. Lost Highway
      2. The Crow
      3. Tomb Raider
      4. Natural Born Killers

      So, that makes 5 albums, a ton of singles/remixes, a few videos/dvds, soundtracks, and of course quake. I'd say he's got quite a portfolio for 20 years work.

      --

      today is spelling optional day.

    23. Re:Another First by RealRav · · Score: 1

      This guy was the first big artist to record the soundtrack for a computer game (remember Quake 1?)
      Devo recorded the soundtrack for the game Neuromancer, which came out on the Commodore 64 in 1988.

    24. Re:Another First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For me, this guy is the most influential musician of the last 15 years.

      Thanks for confirming that mac users are motherfucking idiots.
    25. Re:Another First by aug24 · · Score: 1

      Yeah but most of all, "Sometimes I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie".

      (quoth Tori Amos)

      J.

      --
      You're only jealous cos the little penguins are talking to me.
    26. Re:Another First by chochos · · Score: 1

      I thought you were talking about The Cell, which also has a lot of scenery that looks like leftovers from Closer.

    27. Re:Another First by pknoll · · Score: 1
      This guy was the first big artist to record the soundtrack for a computer game (remember Quake 1?)

      I didn't know that. Descent II, which was released in 1996, features music by Skinnypuppy. I suppose they're not "major", but it's interesting to note that Reznor may have started the ball rolling, so to speak.

    28. Re:Another First by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he's not exactly the father of industrial music (that label could either be attributed to any member of Throbbing Gristle or Al Jourgensen)
      Try Pink Floyd for father of industrial as per their 1975 release "Wish You Were Here". The instrumental parts of "Shine on you Crazy Diamond" are instrumental as is the rhythm section in "Welcome to the Machine".
  32. iWonder what this will mean by circusboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    for apple sales to the college crowd...

    when I was in college, it was mostly Macintosh, <disclaimer> it was an art school</disclaimer> though we did have Irix and AIX stations for 3D work (and even an amiga for video.) I understand that things have changed since then ( I haven't really been paying attention,) to be mostly a windows thing. (It is for the college I currently work for, (though I was lucky enough to be given a mac to work on instead.))

    do you all think that the mix of iPod, iTunes and now GarageBand are enough to grab a reasonable share of the impressionable, fashion-conscious, future buyer? Or do you think that Apple might cave, and put out GarageBand for windows? (though guessing its dependence on coreAudio might make that port a more significant challenge.)

    (iNote with some interest that the spell checker in panther passes iPod and iTunes with out a pause, but fails with GB and iNote. It will be interesting to see the dictionary in Tiger to see what iThings will pass the spellchecker... note that it does not offer iPod as an alternative spelling, it just doesn't mark it as misspelled.)

    --
    -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    1. Re:iWonder what this will mean by cowscows · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't see garageband ever coming out for windows. It's cool, fun software, and it's another reason for someone to buy a mac. But that's pretty much where it ends. There's no real market share to compete for there. iTunes went to windows because the more copies that get spread around, the more songs will get purchased on Apple's music store.

      Apple doesn't make more money every time someone creates a new garageband song. They make more money everyone buys a mac, so keeping garageband as an incentive makes sense. I guess you could make the argument that people trying out garageband might decide that Apple makes quality software, and start looking at macs more seriously. I've seen some anecdotal evidence of that with iTunes, and definitely with the iPod. But I think garageband might be more work than it's worth.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:iWonder what this will mean by sevinkey · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't know that apple needs to release garageband for windows anyway, I was very happy using the Sonic Foundry (now Sony) audio suite on PC, and the rest of my favorite software like Reason and Reaktor were PC ports of mac versions anyway.

      I switched (unintentionally) to mac after I found a bargain on a G4 tower and started using it... these things don't crash. I've lost so much work in my lifetime due to PC crashes. When I'm writing music, I don't want to have to worry about keeping the platform going, just like your fedEx guy doesn't want to worry about his truck.

    3. Re:iWonder what this will mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      when I was in college, it was mostly Macintosh, <disclaimer> it was an art school </disclaimer>

      Well, I'm currently in college, and now that they've rolled out campus-wide wi-fi I'm quite astonished at the number of Powerbooks and iBooks around here, even in the Engineering building, and even the undergrads, not just the research folk.

      It's not uncommon to see a majority of Mac laptops, if not a 50/50 split. And I guess it makes sense; An iBook is only a couple of hundred bucks more than a cheap Wintel laptop (and the cheapest Wintel laptops are most certainly complete garbage.)

      Why on earth would Apple release GarageBand for Windows? They write software like iLife specifically to make the Mac platform attractive to users. The only reason iTunes is available for Windows is to sell iPods.

    4. Re:iWonder what this will mean by daviddennis · · Score: 1

      I now work for the Department of Chemistry of a major university that I'd better not name just yet.

      When a student's brandishing a notebook, there's about a 90% chance it's an Apple one.

      The professor I'm working with has a Tablet PC but uses Linux on the desktop.

      When I attended meetings of content creators, there's about a 70% Mac market share.

      So things are actually pretty good, at least where I work.

      D

    5. Re:iWonder what this will mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (you don't (happen to be (a lisp)) programmer)
      (do (you ?))

    6. Re:iWonder what this will mean by circusboy · · Score: 1

      (just learning)

      it occurred to me that since I spend a lot of time writing and speaking in parenthetical statements, that it might be worthwhile to learn a language that "speaks" like I do.

      I'm actually leaning towards Objective-C though, less like me, but such pretty graphics/interfaces, (through cocoa anyway.) I hear tell that there is a lisp/cocoa bridge being worked on, though the last time I checked it wasn't for SBCL, which to date is the most reliable lisp for the mac that I could afford. it seems to be a fun language. have begun experimenting with pyObjC a bit, and that looks promising as a middle ground of sorts.

      In response to some of the other posts that responded to my other post, I didn't mean to suggest that Apple should port GB to windows, in retrospect I feel that I may have phrased the question poorly. I would be very happy if Apple managed to achieve a level of about 10% of the market, (I can hear the collective 'hah' from here, (I have read somewhere recently that they were headed back up to 5%, but I haven't the link to back that up, sorry)) as that is a level that guarantees a large enough market for 'major' software companies to write for, (assuming of course that the company/developer in question does not write an application that turns out to be a really great idea for addition to the OS. (because at that point, well, you know what seems to happen...) though honestly they seem to be doing pretty well for 2 or 3%. As they start to make more of their own software that is a worthwhile alternative to the established packages, so long as they remain profitable, who cares what the percentage is?

      I suppose what I was really wondering was whether or not anyone else thought that this might be an addition, (or the proverbial straw,) that causes the hoped for halo effect that the iPod and iTunes were supposed to do. since they have previously ported those two products over to windows, there wasn't very much incentive to switch. Now, however, a famous person, (whether you like his stuff or not, (I do, (well some of it) but that's just me)) has released a product, that will only run on a piece of software that runs on an Apple. Where will this go, (if anywhere?)

      Personally, having bought a number of DVDs with "PC only" 'features,' I'm thrilled.

      --
      -- it's ridiculous how many people misspell ridiculous... (damn, damn, damn...)
    7. Re:iWonder what this will mean by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      my college's freshman laptop program gave art majors macs and everybody else pcs. the 'good' design labs were furbished with macs too. whee.

    8. Re:iWonder what this will mean by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1
      I don't know that apple needs to release garageband for windows anyway, I was very happy using the Sonic Foundry (now Sony) audio suite on PC, and the rest of my favorite software like Reason and Reaktor were PC ports of mac versions anyway.

      While I'm sure the developers of Garageband are flattered that you consider Garageband in the category of Reason and Reaktor, I would like to point out the Garageband is a consumer application.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
    9. Re:iWonder what this will mean by sevinkey · · Score: 1

      and a damn good consumer application at that. I'd never really used it much until trying out this remix, and I'm impressed with how easy it is to use, but definitely consumer.

  33. From The Man... by metalligoth · · Score: 5, Informative

    Note from Trent in the .sit file:

    Hello all-

    For quite some time I've been interested in the idea of allowing you the ability to tinker around with my tracks - to create remixes, experiment, embellish or destroy what's there. I tried a few years ago to do this in shockwave with very limited results.

    After spending some quality time sitting in hotel rooms on a press tour, it dawned on me that the technology now exists and is already in the hands of some of you. I got to work experimenting and came up with something I think you'll enjoy.

    What I'm giving you in this file is the actual multi-track audio session for "the hand that feeds" in GarageBand format. This is the entire thing bounced over from the actual Pro Tools session we recorded it into. I imported and converted the tracks into AppleLoop format so the size would be reasonable and the tempo flexible.

    So...

    You need a Macintosh and you need GarageBand 2.0. If you have a newer Mac, you already have the software. The more RAM you have the better. I did this on a PowerBook 1.67 w/ 2G RAM but it has been running on far less powerful systems. Drag the file over to your hard disk and double click it. Hit the space bar. Listen.

    Change the tempo. Add new loops. Chop up the vocals. Turn me into a woman. Replay the guitar. Anything you'd like.

    I gave this to my crew and band to test out and all work effectively stopped for a while - it's fun to mess around with. I've now heard a country version of the track as well as an abstract Latin interpretation (thanks, Leo).

    There are some copyright issues involved, so read the notice that pops up. Giving this away is an experiment. I'm interested to see what comes of it, what issues are raised and what the results are.

    Have fun-

    Trent Reznor

    April 15, 2005

    1. Re:From The Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Turn me into a woman ...

      My fantasy come true! It's like he's been reading my diary ...

    2. Re:From The Man... by austad · · Score: 1

      I thought the max ram in a Powerbook was 1.2G?

      --
      Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
    3. Re:From The Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, that's just the 12 Inch PowerBooks that have 256MB soldered on, and one free SODIMM module. All other PowerBooks have two SODIMM modules (2 x 1GB).

    4. Re:From The Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pfft. He's already halfway there.

      I wonder, if Bowie and Reznor hooked up, who'd be the "man"...

      Ew. That's gonna keep me up tonight.

    5. Re:From The Man... by identity0 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The interesting thing is that Trent has been a geeky guy for a while - he made "Pretty Hate Machine" using a Mac and a MIDI keyboard, IIRC.

      He's also made the soundtrack for Quake because he liked Doom so much, and is close friends with John Carmack.

      While not as geeky as some of the electronica musicians out there, he's still got geek cred.

    6. Re:From The Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can pull your age from this post. If you were under 30 it would read "blog" instead of "diary". ;)

    7. Re:From The Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He's been hanging out with Manson too long.

    8. Re:From The Man... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want to fuck him as a man. mmmmmm sweet trent reznor man-pussy.

  34. Popular with electronic artists by sadida_333 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think it is great that Reznor is doing this and I think it is great that it is getting some visibility. It should be noted that many electronic music artists have provided similar "full access" to their music for remix competitions in the past. BT actually made 4 tracks available for all to tinker with.

  35. Great for Educational Uses by pbooktebo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What I love about this most is not the remix potential. I teach at an arts high school, and I plan on bringing this in to class.

    I loaded the file into GarageBand and gave it a listen. What I love is that you can "solo" any of the tracks (listen to just that track and nothing else). Trent has done a nice job labeling all the tracks (there are 17 of them in all). Some are especially subtle, and it is great to hear just the "Ambience" track, then put the whole mix back on and listen for it.

    This gives students a chance to better understand how much creativity it takes to make what basically sounds like a simple rock song.

    Remixes are also a great use of this technology, but the ability to break complex media down to their components and discuss how they enhance our experience is really priceless. I'd love to have this with "A Day in the Life" from the Beatles, too (hear all those grand pianos at the end one by one)! Someday...

    1. Re:Great for Educational Uses by rigorist · · Score: 1

      I totally agree.

      I've been messing around with GarageBand for a few months. While I can play bass and guitar, I have no idea how an actual song recording is constructed. I love having this so I can see how the various tracks are put together to make an entire song.

    2. Re:Great for Educational Uses by (el)Capitan.Nick · · Score: 2, Interesting
      --
      "Never let your sense of morals prevent you from doing what's right." -Isaac Asimov
    3. Re:Great for Educational Uses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't been able to listen to the tracks individually, but together, they sound fab!

      http://regnyouth.blogspot.com/

    4. Re:Great for Educational Uses by babyphatman · · Score: 1

      this may be interesting for your students... along the same lines you can rearrange two bobby mcferrin songs... "just enough" and "don't worry, be happy"... and in real time too if your quick enough!

      --
      A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals...
    5. Re:Great for Educational Uses by chris_eineke · · Score: 1
      I'd love to have this with "A Day in the Life" from the Beatles, too (hear all those grand pianos at the end one by one)! Someday...

      Looking at the cost of a grand piano tells me that you (or me, heh) won't be able to afford the real thing. But how about the not-so-real thing? Ever tried the sample-based grand piano by Steinberg? Or how about the grand piano synth? I admit, it's still some serious dough, but just get a couple of bright musically-inclined students, get the sheet music, and record it on your own. Since you are a teacher at an arts high school, I assume the recording technology is already there and available. If not, you can buy older hardware for a fraction of the price of new stuff.
      --
      "All you have to do is be fragile and grateful. So stay the underdog." Chuck Palahniuk, Choke
    6. Re:Great for Educational Uses by ManxStef · · Score: 2, Interesting
      s. I'd love to have this with "A Day in the Life" from the Beatles, too (hear all those grand pianos at the end one by one)! Someday...

      Afraid that one won't happen unless someone invents some fancy tech to pull each instrument out of the audio stream! Back in the 60's when the Beatles recorded Sgt. Pepper's the highest number of tracks the best multitrack recorder could handle was four (a "4-track", probably using 2-inch tape), so they didn't have much to play with at all, at least that's what my music tech teacher told me. This actually makes Sgt. Pepper's all the more amazing: given the technical constraints of a 4-track you've only got 2 spare tracks to play with at any one time, and have to "bounce" these to the other 2 (say 3 & 4) to get a stereo recording (3=L, 4=R) and free up these tracks again, thereby losing the ability to adjust levels, pan, and aux/insert effects on everything you're bouncing down. So the logistics of recording must've been horrendously complicated, and that's not even mentioning their groundbreaking invention/use of tape-loops and the like! Which brings us to "A Day in the Life": they actually jury-rigged two 4-tracks together for it, syncing them manually I think with a primitive click/sync track, absolutely amazing stuff at the time. Sgt. Pepper's Lonely Hearts Club is truly a masterpiece, both sonically and technically.

      A quick Google search reveals more details here:
      http://www.avrev.com/music/revs/beatles/
    7. Re:Great for Educational Uses by Pauper · · Score: 1

      This gives students a chance to better understand how much creativity it takes to make what basically sounds like a simple rock song.

      Absolutely. Not just students, even, but anybody who's interested in peeking behind the curtain to see a small part of what goes into making, as you say, what sounds like a simple rock song. (Though in a sense, it is simple - most of the tracks are synth keyboards, guitars, or percussion - in other words, the building blocks of rock.)

      More important, it might even win him some new fans - folks who used to be somewhat jaded about listening to the music of a rocker who primarily seems to record for video games. I know I'll be checking into NIN a lot more than I would have considered had my only exposure to it been Quake and the T-shirt worn by a certain youthful slacker culture.

      As for the song itself, the only change I can consider making is replacing Trent's vocals with the voice track from the Animaniac's song I'm Cute. (If you've heard the song, turn off the vocal track and sing along with the lyrics on the other end of that link - you'd be amazed how well they fit the rhythm, for the most part.)

      Anybody know where I can find a 16-track Animaniacs remix?

      Pauper

      --

      Another blow struck for decisiveness...or was it clarity?
  36. Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How does a person I've never heard of, from some group I've never heard of, releasing stuff I don't care about in some mac proprietary format should be a reason to switch to a platform and OS that I've never cared for?

    Oh, wait, this is /. Of course any pro-apple post will be modded up, even if it's wrong or just plain stupid.

    1. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      lol, what?

    2. Re:Insightful? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      How does a person I've never heard of, from some group I've never heard of

      I can understand that... Its because you was born in the '50s or may be in the '90s...
      Who know... who cares about you anyways?

    3. Re:Insightful? by gryphokk · · Score: 1


      If I was that ignorant, I'd post anonymously too.

      --
      And you, madam, are very ugly. In the morning, I shall be sober.
  37. Performance tip for non-G5 users by Logic+Bomb · · Score: 5, Informative

    People who won't use GarageBand much may not have noticed that by default, new tracks are created with both Echo and Reverb plugins turned on and their values set to 0. If you get errors during playback saying "too many plugins or effects" for your system, go through track by track and turn off Echo and Reverb. Even though their values are set to 0, they seem to still occupy CPU cycles. Made the track playable on my 1 Ghz G4 iMac with 512 MB RAM.

    1. Re:Performance tip for non-G5 users by BandwidthHog · · Score: 1

      Good tip, thanks. Surprisingly, even without disabling all that, it played flawlessly on my 533mhz G4 tower with 1GB RAM. The side scrolling was lagging and jerky, but audio was perfect.

      Just disabled all the silent effects; CPU is still pegged, but the visuals (side scrolling, VU meters, etc.) are still laggy but (I think, could be placebo) somewhat better.

      --

      Quantum materiae materietur marmota monax si marmota monax materiam possit materiari?
    2. Re:Performance tip for non-G5 users by PostItNote · · Score: 1

      Thanks! Another performance tip is to turn all software instruments into real instruments in the preferences menu.

      Between the two of those, I think I've got it...

    3. Re:Performance tip for non-G5 users by Queer+Boy · · Score: 1

      According to Apple, the best way to increase performance is to lock the track which renders it to disk. It works with software instruments and real instruments that use complex effects.

      --
      Not since Marie-Antoinette played milkmaid has looking simple and honest been so fake and complicated.
  38. Thank You, Trent by Neuropol · · Score: 0

    I will get to work on this right away.

  39. Correction, cowboy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Leslie Rankine released a Ruby track in exactly this way and for this reason, and with these results (though substantially less publicized) about 5 years ago.

  40. If you like this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You might also like Noodle Heaven.

  41. Re:nice going nin+ by EtherAlchemist · · Score: 1, Redundant


    ... a step in the right direction :)

    I agree! That direction being following in the footsteps of others.

    If anyone remembers Acid prior to Sony's acquisition of SoundForge, they had guest artists all the time who would provide tracks for public remix and then the bands would choose the best one. Not just no-name or rarely heard of groups (NOT saying Nine Inch Nails is either of those) but actual artists. I remember remixing Gravity Kills, Garbage and The Beastie Boys.

    The thing that gets me about this article though, is that it says "...this is the first time such a project has been as open to the common user." but this is false on two points.

    1 - As I just mentioned (and is discussed in a number of other posts) this isn't the first time this has been available.

    2 - Since when (and I'm not trolling here) are Mac users "common users?" Forgive me if I am wrong, but Windows has the dominant market share. I would think Windows users would be common users.

    All is not lost though, from what I understand, GarageBand is a loop-based system. So apps like Acid should be able to play with these files.

    --
    R(k)
  42. Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by errxn · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    How about, gee, releasing the original ProTools session under that EULA for those of us who don't own or use GarageBand but do happen to have a real audio package? What a concept! I guess it wouldn't be all "neato" and stuff if it weren't in an officially Apple-sanctioned format, though.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    1. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by cowscows · · Score: 5, Insightful

      In the little blurb he wrote up to go with the release, one of the things he talked about was how going to garageband allowed for much smaller file sizes. Maybe nobody wanted to host the full size dealie.

      People like you, I just don't understand. Someone gives the world something, a complete gift, and you bitch that it's not enough. What is your problem? If he did put out the ProTools session, you'd probably complain about the EULA. If he made it less restrictive, you'd wonder where the hell the rest of his songs were.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    2. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by joel8x · · Score: 2, Informative

      I prefer this method only for the reason that unless you own every plug-in for pro tools that NIN used, the tracks would be a mess. This way he can created loops out of each track that are there own entity. If you have access to a Mac, you can just get the aiff files from the GB package and add them to the DAW of your choice.

      --
      Sound waves should be free!
    3. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Parent deserves to be modded up.

    4. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

      Please mod the parent up through the roof. He nailed it.

      Nicely said my friend. :)

      wbs.

      --
      Huh?
    5. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by errxn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, yes, I guess I do sound like I'm bitching, but it's not about Trent Reznor or the fact that he released the tracks to the public. That, in and of itself, is a very cool move, and I agree, it's a complete gift.

      This having been said, let me ask you a question. Do you think that if the tracks had been released in some, oh, I dunno, say, Windows-only format, that it would be receiving the same ebullient praise here today? I didn't think so. See my point now?

      As for the EULA, it is fine and completely understandable. If I were Trent Reznor, the last thing I would want to do is be in some club somewhere and hear samples of my material in some crappy remix that was "produced" by DJ WhiteKidWannabeGangstaFromDaBurbs. Would you? Again, I didn't think so.

      So, where the hell are the rest of his songs? Hehe.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    6. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by errxn · · Score: 1

      I'd prefer the raw tracks anyway. After all, the idea is to be creative with the material, not just reproduce his mix, right?

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    7. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by cowscows · · Score: 1

      If it were in a windows only format, it might be getting the same praise. It depends. Here's what I think is important.

      Garageband is a fairly easy to use piece of software that comes free with a bunch of computers. Something like ProTools is, well, it's got pro right in the name. That's sort of intimidating.

      The garageband focus really makes it look like Reznor is doing this for the every day fan. That's what makes it so compelling, at least to me. I don't know a damn thing about audio, I'm not a musician, and I've hardly even touched garageband, despite the fact that I've had it sitting on my harddrive for months. Yet now I'm downloading this file so I can mess around with it.

      The fact that it can get someone like me excited about making (editing?) music is what's so cool. The fact that you'd like to be able to play around with the tracks in ProTools is entirely understandable. I was more bugged by the bitter tone of your original post than anything else.

      --

      One time I threw a brick at a duck.

    8. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by errxn · · Score: 1

      Sarcastic? Sure. Smarmy? Possibly. But...bitter? Nah, it's too nice a day today, and plus, it's the weekend.

      --
      In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
    9. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      What windows format would that be? Is there a common windows equivalent to garageband that comes with windows?

    10. Re:Hey, I've got this wacky idea! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can afford ProTools but not garageband?

  43. First or not, who cares? by borud · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Who gives a rat's ass if this is a first or not!? If you're into firsts then go buy a stack of Guiness Book of Records -- it has plenty of fodder for you.

    What is cool is that he is a major recording artist (whether you like his music or not) and that he has made it trivial (rather than just "possible") for the masses to remix his music.

    It's not like it wasn't worth doing if someone had done it before.

  44. Cool by joel8x · · Score: 1

    Now, if only more artists did this... It would make mash-ups nice and easy if consumers had access to the raw files!

    Now we just have to wait and see how the RIAA overlords handle this since major label artists are giving back to their fans. Shame on you artists for being creative without a pricing model! SHAAAMMMEEE!!

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
  45. Ha by unsinged+int · · Score: 4, Funny

    Some fan you are. You spelled their name upside-down.

    1. Re:Ha by pipingguy · · Score: 1


      Give him a break, he could have written, "Ni! Ni! Ni!", causing all to cower and start searching for shrubberies and herrings.

  46. Not the first time by G3ek · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is not the first time Trent has done something like this.
    Right after The Fragile [amazon.com] was released, Trent and David Bowie both put a song online from their new albums to be remixed by the public but you had to use a proprietary web based application.
    it was really fun getting to mess with the tracks, and I applaud Trent for this venture. I 3 NIN.

    1. Re:Not the first time by kureido · · Score: 1

      I 3 NIN.

      I 4 NIN.

      Wait, I don't want to play this game, I'm gonna lose.

  47. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is billed as the first time an artist has released such a track to the public for remixing, but it probably isn't.

    No, its probably not, I'm sure theres a lot of artists out there that allow remixes of their music, even the songs you buy from them.

    But, how many major artists have done so, and done so in a format actually suitable for remixing (as opposed to an mp3 or ripping a cd track)?

  48. Re:nice going nin+ by h4rm0ny · · Score: 1


    Agree with both points (although anyone with a little savvy should be able to get this on a PC), but a little addendum.

    It's only a couple of generations ago that all music was essentially open to the public, and considerably more open than this! If you heard a good song and you could play an instrument, then you'd probably perform it yourself somewhere. That's how it grew.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  49. Halo 2 == Pretty Hate Machine by tepples · · Score: 4, Funny

    Personally, I'll wait for: "Trent Reznor Releases Three Guitar Riffs as Halo 2 Weapons."

    Which songs from halo two are you talking about?

    1. Re:Halo 2 == Pretty Hate Machine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Head like a hole sounds appropriate...

  50. So wha by tulimulta · · Score: 1

    Did I understand correctly, that you effectively cannot do anything with those samples besides having fun with them in your bedroom studio? If this is so, this is not that interesting. You can sample any music you like from any source you like and have fun with them with yourself.

    Granted, it's nice having having different instruments and sounds as separate files, and for sampling-challenged Apple Garageband users the format is a big plus, but there's nothing genuinely new or innovative here, since you can't even distribute your creation to the public. (Provided that I understood the EULA correctly.)

    I wish they he had declared a remix competition open to public for example. The best remixes could have ended on a compilation.

    1. Re:So wha by Miss_Saturnine · · Score: 1

      We at The NIN Hotline are running a competition that is open to all and everyone (and to win prizes too! OH MY GOSH!). We're closely affiliated with nin.com, so basically we're just saving them time and effort by taking it off their hands. :)

    2. Re:So wha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We're closely affiliated with nin.com you're a troll wherever you go, aren't you?

  51. Shamen too (1989). by cve · · Score: 1

    The "Move any mountain" single included all the samples. "Monkeys" was my favorite.

  52. Been looking for Him by jeephistorian · · Score: 2, Funny

    Glad to hear that Brian found Jesus. We let Him out a few months ago to get a bit of air and next thing we know...He's gone, poof, nada....

    Could someone please post where Brian put Jesus so that we could come and get Him? Oh, just to make sure, our Jesus weighs 27 pounds and is black and white and likes to play fetch...

    thanks.....
    _____________

    --
    Huh?
  53. Re:nice going nin+ by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 1

    >>Since when (and I'm not trolling here) are Mac users "common users?"

    I take this as meaning that the work can now be done by non professionals on consmer grade hardware.

    Face it, the Mac, for all it's coolness and goodness is a consumer grade platform. Despite the fact that it is used by the pros.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  54. Re:In other words. by walrus-zero · · Score: 1

    He's only releasing it like this because he couldn't be arsed mixing it himself.

  55. NIN did the sounds and music for Quake 1 by Vandil+X · · Score: 1

    NIN did the sounds and music for Quake 1. It's in the credits both in-game and in the docs.

    The "NIN" on the boxes was a double-credit, for NIN's involvement with the game and the fact that the ammo were nails for both types of nailguns.

    --
    Up, Up, Down, Down, Left, Right, Left, Right, B, A, START
    1. Re:NIN did the sounds and music for Quake 1 by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      I haven't yet seen a game since then that had the same wicked atmosphere and soundtrack all mixed together. Quake was SPOOKY cool....

    2. Re:NIN did the sounds and music for Quake 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well yeah, I certainly hope the ammo for a nailgun would be nails.

  56. Works In GarageBand 1.0 by metalligoth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not as cool, but it does work in GarageBand 1.0 - Just be advised, you need to click through a seemingly endless string of warning dialogs.

  57. Sonic Foundry Acid by DaveCBio · · Score: 1

    Well, now it's Sony Acid. They have been doing this type of thing for years. They've had Acid Planet remix contests almost as long as Acid has been around with major artists like Garbage and Madonna. So, why is it when something like this happens on the Mac people act like it's groundbreaking?

    1. Re:Sonic Foundry Acid by cellophane01 · · Score: 0

      Those contests are f*cking rigged.

      Also, Acid blows.

  58. Re:In other words. by vain+gloria · · Score: 3, Funny
    Even people who don't like Nine Inch Nails appreciate the DVD when I show it to them :)

    Maybe they figured out that if they didn't seem to appreciate it you'd make them watch it again until they did ;)

  59. Re:In other words. by GeorgeMcBay · · Score: 1

    This is billed as the first time an artist has released such a track to the public for remixing, but it probably isn't.


    Wow, that's a pretty useless comment even by Slashdot standards. If you can't be bothered to google for a couple of seconds to see if it is, indeed, the first time, why comment on it?

    And for the record, the important thing here is that NIN/Trent is a "major" well-known artist. And while major artists (eg Bowie) have been involved in authorized remix situations before, the big deal here is Trent released what is essentially the source code of the song (not Open Source style, more like Shared Source style), making it a LOT easier for Joe Average to try his hand at a remix. Usually the remixers are left to their own devices to cut and make loops of the original track, which requires a lot of skill and, arguably, access to rather high priced audio software.

  60. Hate to be cynical... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NIN FUCKING RULES!!!111oneoneone

    Now that I've got that out of my system, the hand that feeds was one of the first tracks off the new album leaked / released to the web, and a lot of people are canning it. "It's too poppy! I have bad taste!" etc etc etc. You can read a lot of interviews with angry Trent getting upset about people bagging out the hand that feeds - hate to be cynical, but maybe that has something to do with this release...

  61. Re:In other words. by severed · · Score: 1

    Perhaps this is the first time that a major well known artist has released his tracks for remix using Garage Band, but others have done it in the past...

    Moby did it on their "Feeling So Real" Remixes Single. At the end of the cd, they included a track titled "remixes parts."

    --

    HaXXXor.com - Naked Chicks Teach You How To Ha

  62. He even owns two Cinema Displays! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.nin.com/visuals/2-23- 05.jpg

    1. Re:He even owns two Cinema Displays! by OmniVector · · Score: 1

      one of theme is a 30" display... mmmmm

      --
      - tristan
  63. Already done by josefkk · · Score: 1

    The British post rock band Mogwai did this with their 'Happy Songs for Happy People' album. It contained a demo version of Cubase SX and all the parts of the track 'Hunted By A Freak'. Glad to see Reznor is making distributing it for free, though.

    --
    I think therefore I am. Therefore, I think, I am.
    1. Re:Already done by fribhey · · Score: 1

      i'm glad you mentioned that. i was going to say something but i'm guessing most people here on /. have absolutely no idea who mogwai is. i bought that CD when it came out but if i remember correctly the demo of cubase was windows only so i never really messed around with the audio files. i've been wanting to import them into garageband but never got around to it.

      --
      / http://suffocate.us
      / http://johngrayson.com
  64. Anyone else here from the Butler area? by Thrakkerzog · · Score: 1

    I grew up near where Trent Reznor did. It's kind of strange seeing a Reznor heater in my grandpa's barn. I guess Trent's dad runs Reznor Heating & Cooling.. and is somewhat well-known in the rural areas up north of Pittsburgh.

    I guess the apple fell really far from the tree. :-)

    1. Re:Anyone else here from the Butler area? by Excen · · Score: 1

      Go figure, right? The best artists usually come from normal backgrounds.

      --
      "No beer until you finish your tequila!" -Leela's Dad
  65. Don't want to sound like a troll, but... by danila · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't it be nice if Nine Inch Nails released their webpages in an open format? I am all for creative freedom and letting the artist express his vision in any way he sees fit, but making the blog using a bunch of gifs with intentionally garbled text looks pretty over the top.

    The blind fans of NIN will certainly not appreciate empty ALT tags...

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  66. gB_NiN by anechoic · · Score: 0, Troll

    in the press release TR states:

    "After spending some quality time sitting in hotel rooms on a press tour, it dawned on me that the technology now exists and is already in the hands of some of you."

    - uh, this just dawned on him?

    and "This is the entire thing bounced over from the actual Pro Tools session we recorded it into."

    - I find the fact he did everything in ProTools and then ported it into gB a rather curious statmement...if gB is so rockin' why didn't he just use gB from the start?

    - oh yeah, because gB sucks and he's only doing this for publicity...got it...

  67. Head Like a Hole remix for Windows by EnronHaliburton2004 · · Score: 2, Funny

    From http://www.nineinchnails.net/lyricshalo3-2.html


    Sec-ur-it-y HOLE!
    Blue scren your soul!
    I'd rather crash
    then give you control

  68. That's Innovation! by greylingrover · · Score: 1

    With the likes of Todd Rundgren, Reznor is pushing the digital envelope for the sake of creativity and consumer involvement.

    Kudos Trent!!!

    BTW, how the F can I get tix in the Bay Area? Who do I have to $%#& up here? ;) ;)

    --
    --- Shoo-be-doo-be-do-wop-say-what-yeah!
  69. BULLSHIT you Apple fanboy! by greggman · · Score: 0

    >this is the first time such a project has been as open to the common user.

    AcidPlanet.com has had remix contests of famous bands for the last 6-7 years! Including groups like Depeche Mode, Baldwin Brothers, Al Jarreau. I still have many of the sample sets they put up for download. They also have a free version of Acid for mixing them.

    They used to put up a different artist's samples about once a month.

    1. Re:BULLSHIT you Apple fanboy! by wheatwilliams · · Score: 1

      Yes, but as far as I know, all those Acid remix contests involved two track mixdowns and not individual master tracks before mixdown. And generally they only offered excerpts from the two track mixdowns.

      So this is the first time that anybody's put up all the separate tracks and loops to an entire song. This is an important distinction.

    2. Re:BULLSHIT you Apple fanboy! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, "Depeche Mode--lol"

    3. Re:BULLSHIT you Apple fanboy! by greggman · · Score: 1

      Wrong again. They are full unmixed tracks and loops direct from the studios.

      For example the Depeche Mode "I Feel Loved" sample set has separate tracks for

      Acoustic Guitar
      Electric Drums
      Lead Male Vocal
      High Octive Background Vocals
      Backing Vocals
      Keyboard
      Bass
      Phased Percussion
      Nord
      Background Boom
      Cowbell
      Electic Kazoo
      Mercury
      Rain Stick
      Reactor
      Seed Pod
      Shaker
      Tamboreen
      etc...

      And each of those is broken in 2 to 8 loops.

      The sample mix re-produces the original song mixing all those parts in realtime in Acid.

  70. not the first, though metropolis isn't very major. by RevAaron · · Score: 1

    this isn't the first time i've seen something akin to this. haujobb released a 2-disc album (on the metropolis label, not "major," but bigger than nothing records). the first album contained remixes of the songs on haujobb's "solutions for a small planet," while the second disc contained all of the audio samples and loops that went into making the music. you could use them to make remixes of haujobb's music, and also to make original music of your own, using their samples with others to make your own stuff. this was waaay back, maybe in 1996-8 IIRC. badass.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  71. It will take more than this to make me a fan by cocoamix · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    I'm an avid Mac fan and also and avid listener of industrial music, but I hate NIN.

    What annoys me more is people who know I love Macs and Industial music automatically assume I MUST be a NIN fan.

    It will take more than a free song and a reminder that he uses Macs to change me into a NINny.

  72. And don't forget by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Funny
    His award winning hit during his vegetarian stage:

    "I want to wok you with some vegetables
    I want to taste you in a stir fry...
    I want to wok you with some vegetables
    With tofu, mushrooms, and rice!"

  73. Re:With Teeth is terrible... by Hatta · · Score: 1

    I'm gonna have to disagree with you about Closer. Forget the "fuck" in the chorus, it's about the instrumentals at the end. The polyphonies he creates still blow my mind 10 years later. The song writing may not be as good as some of the others, but for musical sophistication that's easily the best 2 minutes on the album, if not the decade.

    As for the fragile, it's not as tightly produced as TDS, but that would be difficult for for a double album. He still manages to pack the album with complex textures and many excellent songs. The only bum track is Starfuckers. It's not as edgy as his previous stuff, but it's still more sophisticated and intelligent than anything else that came out in the pop/electronic/industrial genres at the same time.

    I haven't heard the new album yet, but I suspect it'll grow on you. It's always taken me a few listens to get what Trent was going for. Great music gets better the more you listen to it.

    --
    Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
  74. Regarding FLA. by Arivia · · Score: 1

    One thing a lot of people forget is that FLA(Front Line Assembly) is roughly only 1/3rd of a band-that band being Rhys Fulber and Bill Leeb(although Fulber did leave FLA for a little while)-the other two thirds of the band being Delerium and Synaethesia/Intermix(Conjure One plays a minor part, too). Between the two of them, they have produced an insane amount of music, but if you're trying to track the evolution in their style, you've got to listen to it all. Together, they make for an excellent study in just how blurred the lines between trance, ambient, and industrial music can be, and you also get to listen to a large collection of simply amazing music. If you really like FLA, and you want more stuff exactly like it, pick up Delerium albums from before Semantic Spaces(the stuff after that is not industrial at all-still really nice stuff, but much more ethereal, melodic and involving many more female vocals)...For example, you'll get the original track The Bonening(by FLA, off Complete Total Terror Disc 2) is based off of-Bleeding, by Delerium. It's a really nice way to see how the same basic melody can be interpreted two different ways by the same people(although Rhys didn't have much input into the contents of Complete Total Terror, as it's mostly unearthed stuff Bill did by himself).

    --
    The role of the writer is not to say what we can all say, but what we are unable to say. -Anais Nin
    1. Re:Regarding FLA. by LizardKing · · Score: 1

      Frontline Assembly were originally Michael Balch and Bill Leeb. Rhys Fulber only joined when Michael Balch left following the "Gashed Senses and Crossfire" album. Personally I only liked one more album they did, "Caustic Grip", which included the jaw dropping "Provision". Then like most of the late eighties industrial bands they disappeared up their own arse and produced watered down techno.

    2. Re:Regarding FLA. by Coryoth · · Score: 1

      Personally I only liked one more album they did, "Caustic Grip", which included the jaw dropping "Provision". Then like most of the late eighties industrial bands they disappeared up their own arse and produced watered down techno.

      I almost agree with you, save for "Implode" which I would rate as one of FLAs best albums. It was, I admit, rather an odd one out sandwiched between the likes of "Flavour of the Weak" and "Epitaph". Otherwise the more interesting work went on with the side projects (Synaesthesia and Noise Unit for instance) which may or may not be to your taste.

      Jedidiah.

  75. That's IT - this is one more nail in my Win2k box by bergeron76 · · Score: 1

    I've been convinced to move to Apple for quite some time now.

    This is "Yet Another Reason To Move To Apple (YARTMTA)".

    --
    Don't think that a small group of dedicated individuals can't change the world. It's the only thing that ever has.
  76. Haujobb also by falser · · Score: 1

    The Ninety-Nine remix album contain a whole second disk with hundreds of clips, loops, beats etc. It's kind of amazing how a musician can take a bunch of usually non-musical sounds and arrange them into flowing beats and rythms. If I had a little more creativity I'd be all over this kinda stuff.

  77. Getting this to work with Windows! by PenguiN42 · · Score: 4, Informative

    First, you need to extract the .sit file: I got the demo of stuffit expander

    Then you need something that can burn the .dmg file, or something to convert it to an .iso: I used dmg2iso (the perl script seems to work better).

    Then I burned the .iso, but it's a mac file system, so you need something that can read mac filesystems. I grabbed the demo of macdrive.

    With that I can grab all the .aif files from the "The Hand That Feeds 1.0.band\Media" directory and import them into my audio program of choice! I couldn't find anything to convert the garageband "projectData" file into another format (it's xml, but with a weird encoded data block), but the .aif files are a good enough place to start playing with the sounds.

    I'm sure there's equivalent utilities for linux, as well, but I don't know about them.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
    1. Re:Getting this to work with Windows! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      There is no step 47.

    2. Re:Getting this to work with Windows! by SwItCH_LiVEs · · Score: 1

      Wow, what an awesome post. You saved me a LOT of time. (i'm a windows user) +5 Karma on Slashdot, +5 Karma in real life! Thank toy.

  78. Re:That's IT - this is one more nail in my Win2k b by PenguiN42 · · Score: 1

    See my post right below yours -- you can get the audio data for use on a windows machine.

    --
    The following sentence is true. The preceding sentence was false.
  79. Ministry sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's why no one knows about them.

    NIN at least is fun to listen to.

  80. Big change for Slashdot by sunderland56 · · Score: 1

    What a change... usually the Slashdot community comes down hard on someone doing things in a proprietary, non-standard format, that isn't useable by 99% of the community. Now, they're cheering it....

    1. Re:Big change for Slashdot by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      as far as I'm concerned, Trent Reznor could join Microsoft and I'd go put a pre-order on longhorn.

    2. Re:Big change for Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless the "community" (aka Slashdot users) has more Apple users than you think.

      I'd be interested in a new poll: what OS do you use on your main computer?

  81. Hear that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That's the sound of Weird Al shitting a gold brick.

  82. Hes' on a major label by Gary+Destruction · · Score: 1

    That's almost never a good sign. There are the elite few that are strong enough to keep it together while being on major labels. But most tend to fall apart and sell out.

  83. Wumpscut did that for Wreath of Barbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    like 5 years ago. Reznor has never done anything original in his life.

    1. Re:Wumpscut did that for Wreath of Barbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Counterpoint: Who the deuce is Wumpscut?

      (And therein lies the point)

    2. Re:Wumpscut did that for Wreath of Barbs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      www.wumpscut.de

      actually yes Rudy did do this before but just gave us a bunch of mp3s of samples. So this is a bit different. plus :w: is only mainstream in germany and some other parts of europe. NIN is alot more well known in the us

      P.S: parent poster , Trent and Rudy both kick ass so fuck off , NIN was already well established when rudy was still djing

  84. what i am surprised about... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    is no one mentions that a short while ago (ok, not so short, but at the height of napster) trent was very against p2p and sharing of music. obviously i don't have the quote, but he was only slightly less against it than metallica.

    i still love the music (since hearing "down in it" and "head like a hole" in a club and had no idea what i was listening to, but had to have it) and think trent has a great talent, but his napster views have always been in the back of my mind when i go buy his material, or look for concert tickets (as of yet i have not seen nin live).

    has he genuinely changed his views on the technology or is he just being hypocritical?

    how about a /. interview with trent, one of industrial music's pioneering kings? i'd love to ask him that question myself.

    1. Re:what i am surprised about... by Bambi+Dee · · Score: 1

      What about this is hypocritical, though? It's his stuff and therefore his decision what to share of it or how to go about doing it. When I share a piece of music I wrote it needn't imply I think everything else ought to be "freeware" as well.

      how about a /. interview with trent, one of industrial music's pioneering kings? i'd love to ask him that question myself.

      Didn't Pretty Hate Machine come out in 1989? Industrial music had been around for a dozen years or more at that time. I wouldn't call PHM industrial anyway; reminds me more of new wave/synth pop with a gothic twist (and a hint of Skinny Puppy and/or EBM maybe, whatever).

      Using guitars wasn't his idea either, was it?

      Not that it matters what it's called (or what I call it, IANAHistorian), I'm not using the "industrial" label as a seal of approval.

    2. Re:what i am surprised about... by darkewolf · · Score: 1

      If that was the case /. would have to interview people like Genesis P-Orridge, Blixa Bargeld, maybe even Boyd Rice. Who predated Trent Reznor by a good 10 years at the very least and are all still going strong.

      But we wouldn't want facts to get in the way of a good post :P

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
  85. tracker music? by radarsat1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    anyone else remember downloading XM and IT files, and loading them in and looking at the samples and the song structure...? ah.. those were the days. Learned so much about music that way.

    1. Re:tracker music? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 1

      Not only do I remember it, I used to mess around with XM/IT/S3M files all the time (sometimes even with NIN music!)... FastTracker II was great. There was a guy who used to put out NIN songs in S3M format, and it was always fun to play around with those. They were on the Hornet archive somewhere if I remember correctly. Indeed, those were the days!

  86. Re:With Teeth is terrible... by Bloodlent · · Score: 1

    Yeah, you are definitely right. The instrumentals in the end are fucking amazing. I'm just so tired of people idolizing Closer and ignoring the rest of the album.

  87. NIN not the first... by vivarey · · Score: 1

    Actually, Trent isn't the first to do this. Beck released the isolated vocal track for his song 'Mixed Bizness' back in 2000 for a remix contest sponsored by Launch.com and Sonic Foundry.

  88. This is not the first time thsi has been done: by zeruch · · Score: 1

    Marillion did something very similiar to this with an entire albums worth of tracks a few years back and actually took the best remixes from the pool of selections and placed it as a "b-side" to one of their legitimate single releases.

  89. numbskulls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hello, /I'm/ reading this thread, inconsiderate clod(s).

    1. Re:numbskulls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inconsiderate clod(s)

      That's INSENSITIVE clods, you ... uh... insensitive clod!

  90. Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive? by Shag · · Score: 1
    Why does "the Windows equivalent of Garageband" cost frickin' $300? The whole iLife suite - Garageband, iPhoto, iMovie and some other stuff - is $79. And that's if you have an older Mac and have to buy it - I think it comes standard on most or all of their new ones.

    Is it because Acid Pro has such an impressively busy interface and Garageband doesn't?

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  91. Reminds me of that SNL with Christopher Walken by crunk · · Score: 1

    We need more cowbell!

    --
    It's the battle of the minds, and everyone's unarmed.
  92. FUQ'R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If Trent is only going to support his Mac fans, then he can go FUQ himself.

    1. Re:FUQ'R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can just go and suxor it you fuggin luzer! Bwahahaha.

      Go Trent!!

    2. Re:FUQ'R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just another example of what the real artists use.

    3. Re:FUQ'R by planetoid · · Score: 0

      Huh? Where does it say Trent uses Jeskola BuzzTracker?

      --
      Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  93. Re:Another by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "This guy was the first big artist to record the soundtrack for a computer game (remember Quake 1?)"

    Xenon II - Megablast had a soundtrack by Bomb the Bass, that was in 1989.

  94. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Shamen did this in 1990 on their Move Any Mountain single... I think the key difference here being that the previously mentioned "been there done that posts" show just releasing raw material. Any remixer or DJ would grab these themselves anyway, it just made mixing in the artist's music more appealing - got them more play, etc. This is all publicity too (what isn't?) the new bit is that it was done with GarageBand, a novice-friendly app, and by a very well known artist -- For Free and prior to the official release of the album. It's buzz generator, but very cool at that.

    also: if you can't open these files in *nix and claim to be a slashdot geek, perhaps you should just give up and go back to CNET.

  95. First Remix? by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 1

    Probably not, but I threw this togeather in about twenty minutes (using the premade GarageBand loops) as a joke to horrify my hardcore NIN-fan buddies.

    My sincerest apologies to Trent Reznor for distroying his song. :(

    1. Re:First Remix? by oneiron · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha! That's great! ...in a horrifying kind of way.

    2. Re:First Remix? by i+love+pineapples · · Score: 1

      Hahahaha! That's great! ...in a horrifying kind of way

      Then I've accomplished my goal!! Thanks! :D

    3. Re:First Remix? by togofspookware · · Score: 1

      Hey, this is pretty catchy. I like it!

      --
      Duct tape, XML, democracy: Not doing the job? Use more.
  96. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by bbzzdd · · Score: 1

    Well, there's always the free Acid Xpress to which Apple has no compliment.

    I am not arguing GarageBand isn't a good tool at a great price. I use GarageBand (and ProTools, and Cubase SX) all the time for home recording on my Powerbook and I love it. I am just pointing out the Windows equivalent.

  97. obvious publicity stunt by SuperBanana · · Score: 1
    Trent Reznor, great musician, got his idea from David Bowie

    I don't suppose it occured to anyone that the whole thing is just a publicity stunt cooked up by Apple and Nine Inch Nails (which, last I checked, was popular about 10 years ago when I was in high school).

    1. Re:obvious publicity stunt by dmarcoot · · Score: 1

      obvious? wow, im hearing about this everywhere, not. the guy uses apple stuff, as a mac user, its natural for him to give back in a format which is convient for him.

      more like obvious troll.

  98. any way to port to other software (ie FruityLoops) by krunk4ever · · Score: 1
    My friend recently purchased the MBox Factory for $550 which was bundled with some really cool stuff such as:

    moogerfooger Analog Delay

    JOEMEEK SC2 Compressor

    JOEMEEK VC5 Meequalizer

    Cosmonaut Voice

    Maxim

    Pre-authorized iLok Smart Key

    the main mixing software that was included i believe as called ProTools. i might be wrong, but i've only seen it once. for those who have actually used an MBox, you might be able to tell me which software it is from the Bundled Software list.

    Anyway, from what I recall seeing, the layout was quite similar to other software available on windows such as ProTools, Cakewalk, Fruityloops, etc. I'm just wondering if there's any easy way to convert or import to something a windows program can understand.

  99. Not to hate on Apple, but... by MunchMunch · · Score: 1
    "Though by no means the first time a major-label artist has released a track to the public for remix, this is the first time such a project has been as open to the common user"

    ...I seem to recall Beck releasing Mixed Bizness, fully multitracked, via Sonic Foundry ACID a while back for a remix contest.

    Now, as most music-software-inclined people know, ACID is basically Garageband, except it came out many many years earlier (and has at this point evolved far past where Garageband is today). ACID, of course, has also been available on the platform that the overwhelming majority of computer users use (Windows), whereas Garageband has and is not. So really, what's with the straight-from-the-marketing-department talk?

    Personally I wouldn't use either piece of software unless held at jagged-broken-PCB-point-- but, hey, as a musician I'm happy that more people are getting into actually producing music, whatever tools they use. Still, I just wish the Applerati would be a little more modest about where music-tool history begins. The way some people talk about Apple's software, they sound like, to put it gently, discreetly and subtly, brainwashed zealots.

    1. Re:Not to hate on Apple, but... by aristotle-dude · · Score: 1
      "Now, as most music-software-inclined people know, ACID is basically Garageband, except it came out many many years earlier (and has at this point evolved far past where Garageband is today). ACID, of course, has also been available on the platform that the overwhelming majority of computer users use (Windows), whereas Garageband has and is not. So really, what's with the straight-from-the-marketing-department talk?"

      Yeah computer users. I wonder what proportion of successful musicians use mac versus windows directly in their work. I also wonder what percentage of the those computer users actually bought their copy of ACID.

      I'm not talking about some shitty "independent" artist but someone who is good enough to consistently produce good shit with mass appeal.

      Obviously, neither Garageband or ACID are used by serious artists except perhaps as a scratch pad for playing with ideas.

      If you had RTFA, you would have known that NIN used ProTools to do the original recording and Trent ported it to Garageband for his mac user fans.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:Not to hate on Apple, but... by WarehouseCU · · Score: 1

      Didn't John Mayer get on stage at this years MacWorld with Steve Jobs to intro the new version of GarageBand and talk about how he has used it. And he ported it using a quite new PB, sounds like Trent is a Mac user.

  100. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    > Why does "the Windows equivalent of Garageband" cost frickin' $300?

    Because Acid Pro is aimed at the (semi) pro market, like Logic (Express), Cubase SX, Cakewalk Sonar, etc. For home-user music software like Garageband you can try Acid Music Studio/Express, Cakewalk Music Creator/Home Studio, Cubase SE, Fruity Loops.

  101. why as garageband by pronobozo · · Score: 1

    why as garageband file? That's what I have to ask. Why make something that can be easily accessible to everyone NOT?


    oh well..

    --
    ------
    insert sig here,here, and here
    1. Re:why as garageband by mindstrm · · Score: 1

      Such as?

    2. Re:why as garageband by PunkPig · · Score: 1
      That's right, why can't Trent make music that is easily accessible to everyone.

      Come on Trent, sugar up your tunes, enough with the anger already.

    3. Re:why as garageband by Anita+Coney · · Score: 1

      Oh come on, Trent is about a sugary as they come. He's basically an angry Inxs. You want real inaccessible music? Try John Zorn, Brujeria, or Throbbing Gristle. Trent is nothing but a pansy poser. He's to the 90s as Sammy Hagar was to the 80s.

      --
      If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
    4. Re:why as garageband by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because MIDI can't have samples (as far as I know, which ain't much) and most people wouldn't have a clue as to how to use an XM file.

    5. Re:why as garageband by carlfish · · Score: 1

      I suspect "because it was there".

      If you read the included readme file, this was very much a spur-of-the-moment idea he had while sitting around doing interviews. Seeing as Reznor is a Mac user, and iLife is installed on all Macs by default, GarageBand was probably the most appropriate (i.e. widely-distributed, cheap, hobbyist) software Reznor had lying around at the time.

      As far as I know there's no standard open format for this kind of data, so you can't really fault someone for choosing one closed format over another.

      Charles

      --
      The more I learn about the Internet, the more amazed I am that it works at all.
    6. Re:why as garageband by pronobozo · · Score: 1

      well just export the audio files. :-P

      all audio programs can open .wav

      --
      ------
      insert sig here,here, and here
  102. Use Transmac to burn the .dmg on Windows by Aggrajag · · Score: 1

    Transmac can be used to open and burn .dmg images. You can download a non-crippled 30 day evaluation version from their site.

  103. Re:nice going nin+ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The major difference being GarageBand is on nearly every mac out there today. What percentage of PCs come with Acid installed?

    And really I find this method far more interesting. Contests are great, but that's all acid had. Here's an artist without going through a 3rd party just saying "here's my track, go have fun with it." It seems far more liberating to me than "remix and win!"

  104. Every time I boot Windows by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I find happiness in slavery...

  105. Global Goon by planetoid · · Score: 0

    Johnny Hawk of Global Goon has been doing this for years with his internet remix contests; Beck, David Bowie, and other more well-known artists have also tabbled cautiously in this concept as well. But Trent is not "breaking new ground" with this.

    --
    Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
  106. I would pay good money for more NIN tunes by PunkPig · · Score: 1

    Hopefully Trent puts out a DVD of his tracks in garageband format.

  107. For us PC users by nedder · · Score: 1

    Can someone convert this to Acid or Fruity Loops format? I am certainly not going to buy a mac just so I can use Garageband.

    1. Re:For us PC users by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Are you telling us that you drop acid and eat Fruit Loops cereal?

      Have you heard of Garageband's big brother http://www.apple.com/logic/ or ProTools http://www.digidesign.com/?

  108. Somebody Call Paris !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Fianlly, music for Paris Hilton to play with.

    Ogg pukes in your general direction

  109. Done on Acid by urbaneassault · · Score: 2, Informative

    SonicFoundry Acid's community site back around 2000-2001 had contests where artists like Beck would post samples from the studio for incorporation into the "best" community compositions. Granted, the name recognition of Trent and NiN is a bit greater than Beck. Also, you could do this for free (not Free) using the community version of Acid.
    Excellent that Trent is dishing out to the Garageband fans, though, and I hope to see more musicians doing the same.

  110. Re:Another by mushroom+blue · · Score: 1

    one word simultaneously shoots down your submission, and asks for more information:

    who?

  111. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by Shag · · Score: 1

    Acid Xpress looks like crippleware, but thanks for pointing it out!

    I use GarageBand too. :)

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  112. I tried to load it into GarageBand 1.something... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

    ...and the error message was "Warning! This Song Was Created By A Newer Defender Version". Curious. I guess the Apple internal name for GarageBand was Defender.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  113. GarageBand 2.0 [or greater] by ukleafer · · Score: 1

    For Logic Pro 7 users ...

    Just open the garageband file as if it were a Logic Project. Logic imports it fine, extracts all the audio files into an "Audio Files" directory, and does its pretty overviews.

    It seemed to open up in a default 64 audio / 64 instrument environment for me, with all the channels set up as drum presets, so I had to remove most of the channels, and then remove gates, chaneqs and compressors for what remained. CPU much happier following the tidy up.

  114. Re:Hes' on a major label by praxim · · Score: 1

    He's been on a major label for at least 12 years. I wouldn't worry too much.

  115. Re:KILL YOURSELF TODAY!!! by Bloodlent · · Score: 1

    Yeah, alright. What a bad flame.

  116. Since sox won't touch this... by adolf · · Score: 1

    Anyone care to convert this back over to a format usable by the rest of the world?

    There's a plethora of Linux multitracking software (along with a healthy dose of it for every other platform), but it doesn't sound like anyone can get within 10 feet of this file without owning a Mac (including myself).

    Who wants to be the first person to hammer out the Ardour-compatible "remix" of this thing?

  117. kwitcherbitchin by billcopc · · Score: 1

    Trent Reznor released something to the public. Now quit looking for counter arguments and think about it for once: NiN is rather large and influential, a household name. They have the clout to make their own decisions with little regard to what the Big Five would want to shove down our throats. Just like Apple makes a fashion statement of going against the grain, so does NiN with this move. Yes it's a bit of a publicity stunt, but how many basement DJ's haven't dreamed of getting their hands on unmixed multitracks ? This enables much greater flexibility and creativity for samplers and remixers, without sucking off some nasty record exec for the "privilege".

    This is a GOOD thing, so quit complaining. Think of it as open-source music!

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  118. Remix audio starting, MIDI files ending by Simonetta · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's ironic that one major artist is releasing a single in remixable form when the music industry is shutting down ALL the MIDI file sites in the world.

    MIDI files are lists of instructions for playing a piece of music. For example, an instruction that says play G# on the trumpet for .68 seconds. These files are usually played through the wavetable synth in the sound card or audio chip. They sound somewhat ridiculous and are often laughed at. They do, however, have one very interesting and special property.
    With a notation program that recreates the sheet music from a MIDI file, they allow a music student to learn a song or piece or music. You have to learn how to read music to use it, but that is not very hard. MIDI files show you the chord patterns that beginner and intermediate players would not be able to derive from simply listening to a song over and over.
    It is the sheet music book publishers that are shutting down all the MIDI files on the web. They are doing this because they believe that ten thousand downloads of a Classic Rock song's MIDI file is the loss of ten thousand sales of the printed sheet music for that song at $5 for maybe five sheets of paper. So, a major music instructional resource is being destroyed to preserve an imaginary market. (Would you buy sheet music of a classic rock song? Would you even know where to get sheet music in your city?)
    This happens at the same time that every school in the country is ending or cutting back on music education in the classroom.

    The whole music industry is insane and out of control. These guys are going to end up destroying their entire industry and destroying a significant percentage of the 20th century's music recordings in the process. First by stealing the public domain by legally extending the copyright period indefinitely. Then by enacting extraordinarily brutal jail penalities for downloading and sharing music recordings, even music that is supposed to be out of the copyright period that was in effect when the records were originally made. Then by putting unbreakable encryption on recordings and passing laws preventing the sale of any music playback device that can play recordings without this encryption. Then raising the price on recordings to pay for all this beyond its value to listeners and collectors. And finally, removing the recordings from the market because "they don't sell".
    In this scenario, all the music recordings that are endlessly pumped into our heads in 2005 will be simply gone by 2055 (most of you reading this will still be alive then). All the music that you grew up will just ... be... gone. Almost all of the music that your grandparents listened to is gone.
    This is why downloading, sharing, and 'pirating' music is critically important to do. You simply can not trust the fools who run the music industry to protect and preserve a society's culture.

    1. Re:Remix audio starting, MIDI files ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's really upto the customers at the end of the day.
      A handful of label is behind this, because their business modell is thretened by technology.
      It would not be impossible to stage a worldwide boycott against them.
      I would also look into a possibility of suing these major labels for monopolizing public airwaves. It would be easy to prove that a handful of labels are controlling what is played on the radio and television.
      Limiting the use of MIDI files and other means for future generations actually will hurt them and the bands they represent. The next generation of musicians simply won't learn and play their songs.

  119. grrr...messed up formatting (Re:Another First) by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

    Kraftwerk (and most 80's new wave) was only really responsible for the EBM branch of industrial music anyway. the rest took what they liked, and moved on to a harder sound.

    Hardly. Almost all industrial bands, when asked their influences, have one band that is almost always listed: Kraftwerk. There are other bands that are frequently named, but none that receives more note than Kraftwerk. I don't even like Kraftwerk all that much, but *that* is the definition of influential. And let's not forget Skinny Puppy, Throbbing Gristle, and others...*they* were influential.

    the rest took what they liked, and moved on to a harder sound.

    Again...the *definition* of influential...

    yeah, because we're all hearing a lot from Godhead these days. for every Eminem or Marilyn Manson, there are first bands that blow real hard.

    You take something I said, and twist it into something I didn't. Did I *say* all first signed bands?? Nope!
    And, as for MM, it was just the right place and time for TR to start a label. *That* is half the story of MM's success.

    this brings up the next point: Marilyn Manson only gained his initial exposure due to Reznor. if what you said was true, then Manson would have stopped selling records after Antichrist Superstar (which was the last record Reznor had anything to do with).

    Again, you put words in my mouth I didn't say. Did I say TR's involvment with the band while recording was the secret of MM's success?? Again, nope! What I *did* say, is they were there at just the right time to receive a massive media blitz propelling them further than, well, they ever should've. And as for how they've managed to continue to sell albums...

    the fact that Marilyn Manson is still able to pump out a multi-platinum record pretty much negates your theory.

    Again, hardly. The music industry is all about business, and next to nothing about quality or creativity. It is planned, constructed, and created to craft what will sell and win it will sell. You throw enough marketing dollars behind even the worse band ever made, and they *will* sell millions upon millions of records. Why? Because you pay radio stations, CD stores, etc. to play their albums, and *whichever* album is being played is garaunteed to sell copies, regardless of what it is. (don't even get me started on payola)

    Additionally, another marketing masterpiece is that such bands can collect a "momentum"...once you get them going, if you do it the right way at the right time, they can keep afloat on their own...on their *past* success and their convinced "fans".

    The other half of MM's success is the same as why you know Dennis Rodman's name over most other basketball players of the same skill...

    apparently, your idea of influence and importance is the ability to create and move product as fast as possible. lemme know how your collection of "influential" backstreet boys albums are doing.

    LOL! You are even hypocritical as well. First you say seem to point out some quality of MM's record sales, then you turn around and accuse me of doing just that! It's one or the other..

    Best part is, yet again, I didn't say that..you continue to put words in my mouth, so I won't bother with the rest...

    1. Re:grrr...messed up formatting (Re:Another First) by mushroom+blue · · Score: 1

      it's a shame you couldn't have refuted any of the points I made, instead of simply commenting on the parts that were less than essential to the post.

      I'm still looking forward to how anything you've refuted makes Trent Reznor less influential.

    2. Re:grrr...messed up formatting (Re:Another First) by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 1

      it's a shame you couldn't have refuted any of the points I made, instead of simply commenting on the parts that were less than essential to the post.

      I went through your post LINE BY LINE, until I just gave up, as I realized it was all going to be landing on deaf ears.

      Heh, looks like I was right...

  120. yes, there's a place... by Phil+Urich · · Score: 2, Informative

    All the info can pretty much be found on this thread about it, including some people hosting sites of the remixes, etc.

    --
    I remember sigs. Oh, a simpler time!
  121. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by wahsapa · · Score: 1

    either my sarcasim meter is broken or... shouldnt you be comparing movie maker to imovie?

  122. Re:I don't understand. by benzapp · · Score: 1

    Trent is a genius, its that simple. Every once in a while a particular artist is recognized as being beyond trends. Trent is one of those people.

    --
    I don't read or respond to AC posts
  123. Re:I don't understand. by BigDumbSpaceApe · · Score: 1
    2. NIN is mainstream.
    Should read :
    2. NIN is mainstream now.

    Some youngsters may not recall how things were when NIN released Pretty Hate Machine. industrial music wasn't popular. Glam rock was dying, and so was the 80's synth pop, and the only thing going was Hip Hop. Every junior high and high school probably had a couple Ministry fans but there wasn't much. Pretty Hate Machine was a breakthrough album for that generation, like Nirvana's first one, Bleach. It didn't sell like a pop album, but definately introduced a generation to a new style of music, with dubbed copies getting passes around alot. (NIN becoming mainstream and selling like a pop album didn't come until Closer came out on the radio, which was kinda like Nirvana's Nevermind)

    It was a very big change at the time in the direction of music.

    --
    WWJD? JWRTFM.
  124. Fedex guy? by billybob · · Score: 1

    When I'm writing music, I don't want to have to worry about keeping the platform going, just like your fedEx guy doesn't want to worry about his truck.

    I'm sorry, but did you just pull that out of your ass, or is it some social meme or inside joke I'm not aware of? It just sounded extremely random :)

    --
    Joseph?
    1. Re:Fedex guy? by sevinkey · · Score: 1

      yeah, I pulled that out of my ass... sorry if my analogy skills aren't up to par on a Saturday morning :)

  125. Torrent for extracted files by L3WKW4RM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's a torrent of all the .aiff audio files extracted out of the .sit, for non-Mac users to remix with.

    http://www.echoingthesound.org/greg/thtfgbmedia.zi p.torrent

    ...and the rest: http://www.desult.com/greg/thtfgbextra.zip

    1. Re:Torrent for extracted files by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      see, now you're just abusing the right to share.

      It is only meant for Mac users. If you the user can't use it with the program it was intended (GarageBand) then it's not for you at all. If you can't open the .band file you should not be having anything to do with it.

  126. AcidPlanet's licensing is restrictive by Infonaut · · Score: 1
    I hadn't heard of AcidPlanet, so thanks for pointing it out. I like a lot of the Chemical Brothers' music, so I went to their contest page. Then I looked up the rules and found this:

    By entering your Remix in the Contest, you acknowledge and agree that: (a) Astralwerks will maintain ownership of the Master and the Loops, and will own all Remixes entered by you in the Contest or otherwise uploaded to the Website (the Master, the Loops and the Remixes being collectively referred to herein as the "Materials"), and (b) as between you and 2004 Virgin Records, 2004 Virgin Records will own all publishing rights in and to the Materials. Each entrant into the Contest hereby grants, sells, transfers, assigns and conveys to Astralwerks, its successors and assigns, all present and future right, title and interest of every kind and nature whatsoever, including, without limitation, all copyrights, all music and music publishing rights, and all rights incidental, subsidiary, ancillary or allied thereto (including, without limitation, all derivative rights) in and to the Remix(es) for exploitation throughout the universe, in perpetuity, by means of any and all media and devices whether now known or hereafter devised (the "Rights"). Sponsors shall have the right, in their sole discretion, to edit, composite, morph, scan, duplicate, or alter, the Remix(es) for any purpose which Sponsors deems necessary or desirable, and each entrant irrevocably waives any and all so-called moral rights they may have in the Remix(es) submitted by him or her. Each entrant hereby acknowledges that such entrant does not reserve any rights in and to the Remixes. Notwithstanding the forgoing, an entrant will retain whatever rights such entrant had in and to any Additional Elements that may be incorporated into a particular Remix, subject to an irrevocable, royalty-free, worldwide, non-exclusive license to use such Additional Elements throughout the universe in perpetuity in any and all media now known or hereafter devised.

    Essentially they let you borrow the loop, and if you enter the contest, whatever you create is theirs. So Sony owns anything you come up with and can do whatever they want with it, forever and ever, throughout the universe. The creative effort you put into transforming the loop is owned by Sony. You can't distribute it - in fact, you even waive all "so called moral rights." If that's not covering your legal bases, I don't know what is.

    Interscope's agreement on the Reznor download is much more agreeable. They basically tell you that you can't make money by selling any alterations you make to the loop.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  127. Upgrade by qzulla · · Score: 1

    I bought my Mac last September and it has GB 1.1. This requires 2.0. It errors out on my system. I am not going to upgrade for $79 just to hear his song.

    qz

  128. yeah but its on Mac! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Garage Band 2 comes free with every Macintosh. Damn near every OS X user also owns a copy of Garage Band, even if they are not musicians, DJ's, or recording enthusiasts."

    It's on Mac. So maybe 4% of home computer owners will be able to do something with these files. Of that 4%, what percentage will actually know about, or care to even download the files?

    FEH

  129. Easy answer. by Oscar_Wilde · · Score: 1

    Or do you think that Apple might cave, and put out GarageBand for windows?

    No.

    Why on Earth would they do that?

  130. Re:I don't understand. by DisKurzion · · Score: 1

    On top of that, I wouldn't say NIN is that mainstrem now either. Admittedly, I havn't listened to too much rock radio, but when I do, I NEVER hear NIN songs. The only NIN song I ever hear on the radio is "Closer," which is from 1994.

    I usually define "mainstream" as "what you hear on the pop radio stations." Look at what plays on most of these stations: 50 cent, Nickelback, 3 doors down, Britney Spears, etc. How many people that listen to these stations know any NIN song other than "Closer"? How many people do you know own "Still" or "The Fragile"? Have you ever heard "Something I can never have" on the FM radio?

    NIN has a decent fanbase, but it is anything but "mainstream." "The Downward Spiral" was the ONLY NIN release to hit "mainstream."

    Interesting read on Trent and NIN:
    http://empirezine.com/spotlight/trent/trent. htm

  131. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by prockcore · · Score: 1

    Why does "the Windows equivalent of Garageband" cost frickin' $300?

    Because it's soo much better than garageband. You can keyframe audio effects. You can have more than 8 tracks.

    Acid5 is more equivilent to garageband (although it can still do more) and it's only $70.

  132. um, cost? by Scudsucker · · Score: 1

    How many "average computer users" popped $150 for ACID (and that's the educational price) to play around with those samples from Beck? Whereas every Mac released within the last year or two has come with Garageband.

    So it would seem "this is the first time such a project has been as open to the common user" would not be an unreasonable statment to make.

  133. I need the Pro Tools version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why not the entire Pro Tools session?
    Why limit it to Mac?
    For real remix let's have the entire PT session...

    1. Re:I need the Pro Tools version by tigeba · · Score: 1

      Very few people would have the proper system (most likely Pro Tools HD) to open up the real session, not to mention owning the various plugins. It seems like releasing a bunch of submixes like he did is the proper way to go.

      It's not like you can't get someone to open the project in GarageBand and export it to whatever format you can use.

    2. Re:I need the Pro Tools version by gumbo · · Score: 1

      Export them as individual WAV files. Export wet versions if the effects plugins used are vital, or export dry versions to give more flexibility to the remixer. Or some combination of both.

  134. AIFF extraction by SonicSpike · · Score: 1

    Hey... how do I extract the AIFF/WAV files from this thing? I have a PC as well..

    Thanks!

    --
    Libertas in infinitum
  135. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by Shag · · Score: 1

    Hmmm. GarageBand can record up to 9 tracks (8 real instruments and 1 software instrument) at once, according to its help. It can, I think, have as many tracks as your system can handle.

    Only $70 is better than $300, though. Thanks.

    --
    Village idiot in some extremely smart villages.
  136. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gadzooks man! How about "And All That Could Have Been," it's a concert DVD from NIN that was shot entirely in DV and edited with Final Cut Pro. Professional quality through and trough. I haven't seen The Fragile yet, but will check it out now. You should check out AATCHB when you et a chance. He's amazing live.

  137. Re:Isn't Apple stuff supposed to be more expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean like Garageband is a crippled Logic Express which is a crippled Logic Pro?

  138. This works with GarageBand version 1.1 ... by xeyr · · Score: 0

    ... not v2 as the web page says. You get a notice saying "please update", but it works fine.

  139. Re:What about Quarashi? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why should the /. visitors bother to read the posts when even the /. editors don't bother to read the posts?

  140. mnb Re:Oh, the possibilities... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Jello would be mighty pissed if he heard you say "New Wave" and "Dead Kennedys" in the same sentance.

    That was the whole point of "Pull My Strings"

  141. "I'd rather die than give you control" by Zhe+Mappel · · Score: 1
    But on second thought, he wouldn't. :-)

    I'm not a huge fan of Reznor's work but I admire him giving users control over his music. That's the paradigm shift here: a notorious studio wiz inviting budding wizards into his tower.

    In the age of the remix and the mash-up, no work of music is ever finished. Think of it. If Reznor's daring move became popular, we'd never have to put up with Britney Spears again: you'd just overlay some loops, remove the cliched beat, bend that nasty little corporate whine of a voice into something interesting, and voila, Nine Inch Britney. ;-)

  142. No World Order by calibanredux · · Score: 1

    In 1993, Todd Rungren released "No World Order," which was billed as the first interactive music CD. (Link: http://www.soundonsound.com/sos/may04/articles/tod drundgren.htm) Using the CD-I format, it provided an interface that allowed users to modify the tracks in a variety of way (changing tempos, removing vocals, etc.). But you were limited to the information on the CD and you could not save the results of your changes. This is not to take away from Reznor. What he has has done is both cool and groundbreaking. But it is interesting to think about the changes in technology that have allowed him to take this step.

  143. Re:I tried to load it into GarageBand 1.something. by WarehouseCU · · Score: 1

    Should have clicked past the warning. It loads successfully and you can play with it.

  144. Those numbers pale in comparison. by i41Overlord · · Score: 1

    While 1.07 million Macs sounds like a lot at first, it pales in comparison to the amount of PC's that were shipped, especially when you consider that Apple is the only company that sells Macs (obvously).

    For reference, IBM shipped 2.9 million PC's in the quarter, and they're a relatively minor player. HP shipped 8.2 million, and Dell shipped 8.8 million.

    That accounts for almost 20 million PC's, and that's only from the top 3 vendors. There are hundreds, if not thousands of smaller companies who make PCs.

    Even considering the stellar year Apple had, it still only accounted for 3.7% of the computer market, meaning that 96.3% of computers were PC's, and not Macs.

  145. Torrent to the .aiffs by statixz · · Score: 0

    Here's the torrent to the individual extracted .aiff.

    Save you all the trouble from having to do it manually.

  146. Dream Theatre by chochos · · Score: 1

    The music is good but I can't stand the singer's voice. Luckily, their songs tend to be long instrumentals followed by a couple of verses, then 10 more minuts of instrumentals to let every member in the band show you how incredibly skilled they're at their instrument and how well they can play together these really hard parts using odd tempos and stuff. Then you listen to the guy wailing a little more and 10 more minutes until you realize it's the next song already and they're all mixed because it's a concept album...

  147. Shiver-inducing experience by Biologist · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Long time pianist and electronic music tinkerer/enthusiastic here... I just downloaded the NIN file and gave it a listen. I honestly have to say that the experience of messing with Trents tracks (!!!) was on par with my first hearing of Tomita's interpretation of "The Planets" or Wendy/Walter Carlos "Switched on Bach". It was like a whole new expanse of music was openned up to me... Wow! It's one thing to kind of know that, in principle, you have the tools to produce something on par with "The Hand that Feeds" (i.e. a computer, a program like Garageband), but being presented with a finished product like this song to mess with is amazing. (I certainly don't claim to have anything even slightly on par with the talent of Trent Reznor or other pro musicians; I am just excited by the democratization of the whole process and the creative opportunities of it all).

  148. Fashion statement... by MsGeek · · Score: 1

    My favorite Reznor/Mac story was how he went out and bought a Blue-and-white G3, and two months later the first G4s with their graphite-and-white color scheme was released. Not only was he kicking himself because he had missed out on Altivec, but he also thought the grey/white G4s were more aesthetically pleasing. The Blueberry color was too cheery, to his viewpoint.

    And my Blue-and-white? It's netname is Trent. Named not after Reznor but his animated namesake from "Daria." ;-) MacOS 8.5.1 was one of the flakiest MacOS releases ever, and that's what was installed on it when I got it. So, he was named after an animated flaky musician dude.

    --
    Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power multiplied.
  149. Re:In other words. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Hi, who are you? Why is my AIM name in your profile?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  150. free ftp space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone needs some ftp space:

    ftp.antennaaudio.com

    login: audio
    pwd: temp

  151. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Go fuck yourself you stupid shit.

    Fuck you and your stupid pyramid scheme you piece of human waste. I hate you with a passion.

  152. Re:In other words. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Alright.. Thanks for replying.

    Back to the topic of my original post..

    Why is that guy using my AIM name in his profile?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  153. This song sux. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the vocals make me want to PUKE puke MY my FUCKING fucking GUTS guts OUT out ON on THE the FLOOR floor AND and THEN then DROWN drown MYSELF myself IN in IT it

  154. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because I can, moron. Why should I change it?

  155. Re:In other words. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Because I would like you to?

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  156. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Nope, not going to happen. You acted like a fucking douchebag and pissed me off. It's staying.

    Go rot in hell.

  157. Re:In other words. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Some other words on the influence of TR:

    The live show for the Fragility tour five years ago was profoundly revolutionary in its use of LCD screens. While they've been around a long time and used for video, Trent took it in an unprecedented direction by using them for lighting effects as well. The DVD captures part of this, but if you were at one of the shows, you know what a stunning visual experience it was.

    Furthermore, TR has always been at the cutting edge of technology, and so far as I know has always been a devoted Mac user. If memory serves, I believe he made his first album, Pretty Hate Machine, mostly or entirely on an old Mac Classic using whatever primitive music editing suite existed at the time. Remarkable.

    And while NIN is credited with but a handful of albums (officially only three full-length studio EPs until the new album comes out next month), Broken (as mentioned elsewhere) is practically a full-length album on its own (and is stand alone, as opposed to takeoffs of another album). And the litany of singles and remix albums are not of the garden variety singles. When Trent remixes a track, it comes out completely new, not just adding a bass line or funky beat, or with a guest vocalist. The multiple mixes of Eraser on Further Down the Spiral being an excellent case in point. Even the live album was spectacular, not just for capturing the concert sound, but for the second disc that consisted of a few remixes and new tracks that would've been worth $15 on their own.

    Finally, to measure the influence or greatness of NIN solely based on the number of full-length studio albums is to miss the point. Listen to a NIN studio album and try to fathom producing the whole thing in just a year or two. Or better yet, start mixing the new track in GarageBand and see for yourself. Then bear in mind that TR basically does it all himself, and also produces countless remix albums, and has other projects like Quake and producing soundtracks for movies like Natural Born Killers, and even manages to find the time to tour on occasion, and you begin to grasp the extent of his influence.

  158. Re:In other words. by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

    Sounds fair.

    I feel special that I've got my own personal troll. ^_^

    --
    Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
  159. The number one selling single of 91' was not... by DaDeacon · · Score: 1

    Ah my man the number one selling single 1991 was not Ministry..
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hot_100_N o._1_Hits_of _1991_%28USA%29
    sorry to say but Everything I Do (I Do It For You) Bryan Adams was damn were you off...