Social complexity seems to be a driver for intelligence. Hyena society is quite complex with clans and a dominance hierarchy within each clan. Hyenas seem to have theory of mind and seem to practice tactical deception. Hyenas are also good cooperative problem solvers, outperforming primates.
I'm not sure that they do. The level of ignorance about web browsers on Slashdot is really disappointing. A web browser is the most commonly used application and yet on a site dedicated to "news for nerds" there's so much ignorance, so many myths, and even flat-out dumb conspiracy theories about browsers.
There are no "clues" in the articles, just drivel. Two of the articles describe the ideas as "oddball" and that's right. There's no point in wasting time on conspiracy theorists and their "theories".
I'm asking for performance numbers under realistic usage scenarios
Having the 15 particular add-ons you use installed is not the common usage scenario. You're going to have to benchmark it yourself and report back. Otherwise it's just more idle talk.
You're making another claim with no evidence. I'm nothing to do with Mozilla. There's no value in your fantasy world. Let me know when you have actual data.
I feel it's fundamentally dishonest to brag about browser speed
So provide the benchmarks with all your particular extensions installed that show the performance difference with and without extensions. Comments with no evidence provided to back the claims are tedious.
Slashdot Mirror
what an achievement
It is. It's ideal for running emulators for projects like the Internet Archive's MS-DOS software library or their console video game collection.
I am beginning a project to port the Linux kernel to webassembly.
No need. JSLinux already runs Linux in the browser. JSLinux can also run Windows 2000
Some examples of problem solving by honey badgers.
Well for one thing, they're not necessarily the loners they were thought to be.
Social complexity seems to be a driver for intelligence. Hyena society is quite complex with clans and a dominance hierarchy within each clan. Hyenas seem to have theory of mind and seem to practice tactical deception. Hyenas are also good cooperative problem solvers, outperforming primates.
Sightings of bigfoot are also probably sightings of bears walking upright.
OSX 3.34%
The 3.34% figure is for only one version of macOS. Adding all the macOS versions together comes to 6.25%, so over twice the marketshare of Linux.
No, desktop Linux market share is much smaller than macOS.
Classic Theme restorer
Just go ahead and use userChrome.css to apply a different theme.
but won't do things yourself.
Pale Moon isn't available for my platform so it fails all benchmarks by default. When will you be providing benchmarks?
I'm not interested in either helping or hurting Mozilla. I'm interested in correcting dirt stupid willful ignorance.
Everybody knows that.
I'm not sure that they do. The level of ignorance about web browsers on Slashdot is really disappointing. A web browser is the most commonly used application and yet on a site dedicated to "news for nerds" there's so much ignorance, so many myths, and even flat-out dumb conspiracy theories about browsers.
clues that suport his theory
There are no "clues" in the articles, just drivel. Two of the articles describe the ideas as "oddball" and that's right. There's no point in wasting time on conspiracy theorists and their "theories".
So do the tests and report back.
I'm asking for performance numbers under realistic usage scenarios
Having the 15 particular add-ons you use installed is not the common usage scenario. You're going to have to benchmark it yourself and report back. Otherwise it's just more idle talk.
I've provided evidence that this person works for Mozilla several times.
Okay, where is it? Show me your proofs.
I've been trolling you since your first reply.
Cool. I was waiting for your admission. You've been reported.
Also there are only 75 extensions or so.
No. As of right now there are 7,040 add-ons available for Firefox Quantum. You can check this stuff for yourself.
You really don't understand what's being said to you, do you. This is as schoolyard as it gets.
Tut tut! Now you're making a claim with no evidence.
No. You're committing the logical fallacies of negative proof and wishful thinking. You have no credibility. Too bad.
Sure do!
This is useless.
you Mozilla marketing people
You're making another claim with no evidence. I'm nothing to do with Mozilla. There's no value in your fantasy world. Let me know when you have actual data.
Why do people post condescending shit answers like this?
How is it condescending? I asked simple questions with simple answers. You can answer them or you can't. Either way there's no need to panic.
You browse without extensions?
No.
I feel it's fundamentally dishonest to brag about browser speed
So provide the benchmarks with all your particular extensions installed that show the performance difference with and without extensions. Comments with no evidence provided to back the claims are tedious.
So.. you don't know. It's better to provide evidence to back your claims. Do you have supporting data or not?
than the number of people who switched to pale moon or waterfox last week.
How many did switch and what's the percentage user share of Pale Moon and Waterfox?