Getting a certain few of the questions wrong might be very disappointing in a public servant (e.g.: I hope they all know who commands the US military). Most of the questions were useless, though interesting, historical trivia. I got 31/33, but if a senator doesn't know the specific dogma of a religious sect, I won't think any less of them as that knowledge would not help them run the country.
Funny that. With the exception of rape-fantasy porn, they look like they're having a good enough time on camera. Are you suggesting that despite sticky mountains of evidence to the contrary, porn performers really *ARE* good actors/actresses? So skilled at acting that they can fool anyone into thinking they aren't being raped!?!?
Also. Please cite your references.
Also, The post you quote wasn't about the merits of porn as it relates to performers or adults. Nor is it about completely illegal, and I think all here would agree abhorrent, kiddy porn. It is about the supposed "dangers" associated with children witnessing adults having sex, And the grandparent claims children have died because of other peoples' religious beliefs while none have died from watching porn. As far as I know, this is true.
Below are two examples of children who died this year in the US because of their parents religion. They would have lived if given any medical care. I challenge you to cite one reference of a child losing his/her life as a result of *viewing* legal adult pornography.
If this manages to become law I propose that everyone in Britain find 1) a buddy and 2) a surveillance camera. Then engage in some consensual "violent" kinkiness with the first in front of the second.
Is it so hard to believe that a Christian can vote with their head and not their Bible? No.
Is it so hard to believe that most Christians will vote with their head and not their Bible? Yes.
Why should I believe that he won't be warped and corrupted by the power of the President's office? You absolutely shouldn't believe that any candidate won't be corrupted by the office. Any winner will be. Some worse than others. It doesn't matter how "pure" their intentions are to begin with. If one of your primary deciding factors is how trustworthy the candidate is, then the best you can do is pick the one you think will remain the least corrupted for the longest time. I don't know if that's Hillary or Barak. It looks like from your perspective Hillary has the handicap coming out of the gate since, as you say, she has "no principles" Who knows how long Barak would last against the temptations of the office, or how much worse than Hillary he could become?
...a war with a poorly understood purpose... I wonder what that's like? The commander-in-chief says our troops have to stay in Iraq until they "get the job done". But what exactly is the job? How will we know when it is done?
Didn't the job originally involve ousting a crazy motherfucker who helped Bin Laden so he wouldn't use his biological/chemical/whatever weapons? Well we did that. FOUR YEARS AGO. And he didn't have any WMDs. Or help Bin Laden.
Easy. Elephants, hippos, alligators, lions, polar bears, and kitty cats were the food for the dinosaurs. The dinosaurs made their way through the dragons, unicorns, hobbits and fairies by the time the flood ended and the rest were spared. They're living on a ranch in Montana now.
GAH! I corrected you and screwed up the numbers myself. Judge Wells allowed *11* of IBM's 198 disputed claims (23, 43, 90, 94, 186-192) and barred the rest.
If there was a clearly observable sign saying that the signal was for customers only then I'm sorry but it is theft.
That's reasonable. Speaking personally I've never seen such a sign at a coffee shop offering free WiFi so I doubt there was one in this case. It's possible though.
Yes this guy was committing theft and should be charged.
It's theft is it? Has anyone here ever been to a trade show and taken the free swag without ever buying the product promoted on said swag? Have you accepted free posters & whatnot from an auto show without later buying a Ferrari or Porshe?
Did you ever accepted the free t-shirts that newspapers and other companies hand out on campuses, at sporting events, concerts, etc. all over the country without later purchasing the goods or services they promote?
Then you sir, are a thief. None of that swag was free for those companies. And you should be charged.
Some coffee shops offer free WiFi in an effort to get people into the store spending money. If it fails, that's too bad. When someone uses their free wifi without buying anything it's perfectly ethical and it's perfectly legal.
Other coffee shops charge customers for WiFi. If this shop can't handle the inevitable freeloaders they've certainly got the option to lock down their network--and until they do the freeloaders are doing nothing wrong.
Slashdot Mirror
Getting a certain few of the questions wrong might be very disappointing in a public servant (e.g.: I hope they all know who commands the US military). Most of the questions were useless, though interesting, historical trivia. I got 31/33, but if a senator doesn't know the specific dogma of a religious sect, I won't think any less of them as that knowledge would not help them run the country.
Actually, What we need are a lot more good programmers. The sex of these good programmers is irrelevant.
Funny that. With the exception of rape-fantasy porn, they look like they're having a good enough time on camera. Are you suggesting that despite sticky mountains of evidence to the contrary, porn performers really *ARE* good actors/actresses? So skilled at acting that they can fool anyone into thinking they aren't being raped!?!?
Also. Please cite your references.
Also, The post you quote wasn't about the merits of porn as it relates to performers or adults. Nor is it about completely illegal, and I think all here would agree abhorrent, kiddy porn. It is about the supposed "dangers" associated with children witnessing adults having sex, And the grandparent claims children have died because of other peoples' religious beliefs while none have died from watching porn. As far as I know, this is true.
Below are two examples of children who died this year in the US because of their parents religion. They would have lived if given any medical care. I challenge you to cite one reference of a child losing his/her life as a result of *viewing* legal adult pornography.
Kara Neumann: http://abcnews.go.com/Health/DiabetesResource/story?id=4536593&page=1
Ava Worthington: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/04/04/AR2008040403314.html
If this manages to become law I propose that everyone in Britain find 1) a buddy and 2) a surveillance camera. Then engage in some consensual "violent" kinkiness with the first in front of the second.
Of course Outlook+Exchange makes you happy compared to Notes!
After a Year using notes (7 & 8), I'd be happy happier communicating with my coworkers using cave paintings.
What's the ruling party called?
The "Ironic Party"?
If one of your primary deciding factors is how trustworthy the candidate is, then the best you can do is pick the one you think will remain the least corrupted for the longest time. I don't know if that's Hillary or Barak. It looks like from your perspective Hillary has the handicap coming out of the gate since, as you say, she has "no principles" Who knows how long Barak would last against the temptations of the office, or how much worse than Hillary he could become?
That clearly depends on how awesomely you want to kill them.
Game 3.0 economy???
Jesus Christ.
You mean something like Remote Desktop's "AutoInstall" feature?m l#autoinstall
http://www.apple.com/remotedesktop/newfeatures.ht
...a war with a poorly understood purpose...
I wonder what that's like? The commander-in-chief says our troops have to stay in Iraq until they "get the job done". But what exactly is the job? How will we know when it is done?
Didn't the job originally involve ousting a crazy motherfucker who helped Bin Laden so he wouldn't use his biological/chemical/whatever weapons?
Well we did that.
FOUR YEARS AGO.
And he didn't have any WMDs.
Or help Bin Laden.
Easy. Elephants, hippos, alligators, lions, polar bears, and kitty cats were the food for the dinosaurs. The dinosaurs made their way through the dragons, unicorns, hobbits and fairies by the time the flood ended and the rest were spared. They're living on a ranch in Montana now.
That's every month.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossbow#Technology
That's a quote from Janice Yamamoto, The woman who nominated him. ...Just so you know.
(+1 Yum.)
The second display is capable of showing MP3s? That's handy.
I like watching audio; cuts down on noise pollution.
The Wi-Ex YX500 series and some of the ones made by Wilson Electronics all suck. Avoid them.
The Wi-Ex YX500 series and some of the ones made by Wilson Electronics Are all great. Get them.
My new web site www.funwithbarbiesandfurbieshappyinnocentfunsitefo rkidswithabsolutelynoanalsexipromise.com ...
Is DOOMED!
GAH! I corrected you and screwed up the numbers myself.
Judge Wells allowed *11* of IBM's 198 disputed claims (23, 43, 90, 94, 186-192) and barred the rest.
21 actually
SCO made 294 claims.
IBM objected to 198 of the claims.
Judge Wells allowed 17 of IBM's 198 disputed claims and barred the rest.
That leaves 117 of SCO's 294 claims standing. ~66% gone.
1 really damn good read. Judge Wells's order was fantastically fun.
That's reasonable. Speaking personally I've never seen such a sign at a coffee shop offering free WiFi so I doubt there was one in this case. It's possible though.
It's theft is it?
Has anyone here ever been to a trade show and taken the free swag without ever buying the product promoted on said swag? Have you accepted free posters & whatnot from an auto show without later buying a Ferrari or Porshe?
Did you ever accepted the free t-shirts that newspapers and other companies hand out on campuses, at sporting events, concerts, etc. all over the country without later purchasing the goods or services they promote?
Then you sir, are a thief. None of that swag was free for those companies. And you should be charged.
Some coffee shops offer free WiFi in an effort to get people into the store spending money. If it fails, that's too bad. When someone uses their free wifi without buying anything it's perfectly ethical and it's perfectly legal.
Other coffee shops charge customers for WiFi. If this shop can't handle the inevitable freeloaders they've certainly got the option to lock down their network--and until they do the freeloaders are doing nothing wrong.