Linking is *not* a crime in UK, no matter what some district judge might personally think. There is no legislation saying it is a crime (or even civil misdemeanour), just an opinion by someone who has nothing to do with any part of an extradition process and forgot that he is supposed to interpret law, not make it up. What he said was "probably illegal" and has no place whatsoever in any legal proceedings.
Posting a letter bomb is most definitely a crime in UK, even if it doesn't kill / maim / hurt anyone because the intent was there.
He was given permission to leave Sweden. So he did. Then something weird and as yet unexplained happened and another prosecutor decided he was guilty of something without including the two women the original questioning had been about.
I've never heard of this "have to be in Sweden to be questioned by a prosecutor" before. Presumably neither Assange nor his lawyers have as well. The prosecutor was asked several times to come to London during the last 450+ days of house arrest but refused without saying why.
If a prosecutor is enough of a "judicial authority" (not in this country they aren't) to authorise a EAW then the Swedish embassy is Swedish enough to be a venue for questioning.
"The more serious problem with Dresden was that arguably they really were targeting civilians."
Same as Coventry. Difference being Churchill knew about the attack thanks to intercepted messages but had to let it happen so the Germans didn't know we had cracked their codes. That incentive for revenge, plus the fact that Dresden was pretty much the only large city not yet hit made it a pretty tempting target.
"In Canada, speech which specifically targets minorities or criticizes religions can be labeled as hate speech with fines given."
You say that like it's a bad thing. Which would you prefer, WBC assholes shouting that your loved one that you are currently burying will been in hell, or the legal facility to shut such hate mongerers down?
It's a bit more than that. A contract that contains a clause that removes your statutory rights can be agreed to without that particular clause being a valid part of the contract but requires a re-issue of the contract without that clause. If the clause cannot be removed (like in a EULA), then the entire contract can be considered null and void...
As a user of websites I know this can happen so they are fine under the law. As a user of my company's website I know this does happen because I'm in the development team so that is fine under the law.
Oh, you meant some other user? How is a site supposed to know what a random user knows, let alone prove it when there is no definition of "user"?
Quite. There's nothing to see here any more. For implied consent you just need a suitably descriptive privacy policy page, which most sites already have. The 11th hour relaxing means everybody can pretty much carry on as usual
There was a rumour that she knew she'd eventually face charges so she got pregnant in order to help her case, as rich pregnant women with connections to the Prime Minister don't go to jail. She claimed her body clock was "ticking" and such scurrilous accusations denigrated the fine reputation of the UK press.
Lest it be forgot, she was editor of the News of the World, a paper that even fish balked at being wrapped in.
Or just get some shipped over from UK. All surge protection devices (strips, pass-through sockets, etc.) are rated at least 250VAC / 13A with response times for some in the nanoseconds. You'll need plug adapters by the crate though...
Windows has done this for years when searching for device drivers...
Linking is *not* a crime in UK, no matter what some district judge might personally think. There is no legislation saying it is a crime (or even civil misdemeanour), just an opinion by someone who has nothing to do with any part of an extradition process and forgot that he is supposed to interpret law, not make it up. What he said was "probably illegal" and has no place whatsoever in any legal proceedings.
Posting a letter bomb is most definitely a crime in UK, even if it doesn't kill / maim / hurt anyone because the intent was there.
You port it to Android with hooks for PS3 / XBox controllers. Even joysticks are supported.
Hopefully they'll be the primary targets from the increased Predator visitations.
He was given permission to leave Sweden. So he did. Then something weird and as yet unexplained happened and another prosecutor decided he was guilty of something without including the two women the original questioning had been about.
I've never heard of this "have to be in Sweden to be questioned by a prosecutor" before. Presumably neither Assange nor his lawyers have as well. The prosecutor was asked several times to come to London during the last 450+ days of house arrest but refused without saying why.
If a prosecutor is enough of a "judicial authority" (not in this country they aren't) to authorise a EAW then the Swedish embassy is Swedish enough to be a venue for questioning.
"The more serious problem with Dresden was that arguably they really were targeting civilians."
Same as Coventry. Difference being Churchill knew about the attack thanks to intercepted messages but had to let it happen so the Germans didn't know we had cracked their codes. That incentive for revenge, plus the fact that Dresden was pretty much the only large city not yet hit made it a pretty tempting target.
If France was one of the countries that hadn't implemented a law this case wouldn't have seen the light of day...
"In Canada, speech which specifically targets minorities or criticizes religions can be labeled as hate speech with fines given."
You say that like it's a bad thing. Which would you prefer, WBC assholes shouting that your loved one that you are currently burying will been in hell, or the legal facility to shut such hate mongerers down?
It's a bit more than that. A contract that contains a clause that removes your statutory rights can be agreed to without that particular clause being a valid part of the contract but requires a re-issue of the contract without that clause. If the clause cannot be removed (like in a EULA), then the entire contract can be considered null and void...
As a user of websites I know this can happen so they are fine under the law. As a user of my company's website I know this does happen because I'm in the development team so that is fine under the law.
Oh, you meant some other user? How is a site supposed to know what a random user knows, let alone prove it when there is no definition of "user"?
Quite. There's nothing to see here any more. For implied consent you just need a suitably descriptive privacy policy page, which most sites already have. The 11th hour relaxing means everybody can pretty much carry on as usual
The UK method is to put a low fence around it with a heritage noticeboard filled with uninteresting facts. Worked for Stonehenge.
I remember when the story broke (in the Sunday Sport) that a London Routemaster bus had been discovered there. They had pictures as well.
It was a much bigger story a few months later when they reported it had disappeared. They had pictures of where it had been to prove it
It's a more correct use than usual as hacking means "unauthorised access"
Works even better when you reply *in detail* to something you haven't read.
There was a rumour that she knew she'd eventually face charges so she got pregnant in order to help her case, as rich pregnant women with connections to the Prime Minister don't go to jail. She claimed her body clock was "ticking" and such scurrilous accusations denigrated the fine reputation of the UK press.
Lest it be forgot, she was editor of the News of the World, a paper that even fish balked at being wrapped in.
Don't you be dissin' mah county, boy, it ain't no wasteland!
Except for Worthing.
We do know what English muffins are. We call them muffins. McDonalds calls them McMuffins. The French call French Fries pommes [de terre] frites.
"Do astronauts get to sue Apple, too, if they discover their 4G iPad doesn't work in orbit?"
If it was advertised as being able to do so and thus a purchase decision was made because of that assertion, then I'd say yes.
The iPad "4G" was advertised as working with UK 4G networks. It doesn't and never will.
Just because the FBI's strawman argument worked to extend them powers they didn't really need doesn't mean your one will be as successful
If I had to implement that method I'd have checked that the highest index of a zero based array is length - 1 for my third comparison...
Not only that but the function doesn't work unless there is some sort of zero indexed array whose highest index is equal to the array length.
Or just get some shipped over from UK. All surge protection devices (strips, pass-through sockets, etc.) are rated at least 250VAC / 13A with response times for some in the nanoseconds. You'll need plug adapters by the crate though...
Have there between any examples that weren't part of the plot in a police procedural show?
I'm sure he is busy working on a new project