Slashdot Mirror


User: Chmcginn

Chmcginn's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
1,120
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 1,120

  1. Re:You've got to be kidding. . . on The Invasion of The Chinese Cyberspies · · Score: 1

    Okay, how about blatant racism? (Check on pretty much all the articles about LA)

  2. Retail stores? on The End of the Bar Code · · Score: 1
    That way, if a bad guy comes to rob them, the only money that is going to be lost is whatever the customers have in their wallets, plus the obligatory packet of bills they hand the idiot

    So... they don't have any retail stores or restaurants as customers? A few years ago, I was the morning manager at a small restaurant. My last duty pretty much every morning was to bring the credit card receipts to the safety box at the local Wachovia, and get enough cash for change for the next day. When I went in there at about 1100 every day, I'd see the same four or five other people, all doing pretty much the same thing. (The watch store down the street, the two drug stores, and the coffee shop in the same plaza as ours). And I was pretty much under the impression, from talking with our accountant & owner, that commercial accounts made a lot more money for the amount of work.

  3. Haven't we seen this before? on Report Claims Men More Intelligent Than Women · · Score: 1
    I seem to remember, years ago, a study released about how, on a random sample of IQ tests, the average (median) of all male and female subjects were pretty close (within the sampling error). The mean was a bit higher for the males, because the standard deviation for men was almost double. I can't find said study now, though... I do remember a lot of people bitching about how it "had to be biased", though, and I couldn't figure out why.

    And it would almost make sense, too, if the gene set for "average" intelligence was dominant (or at least some parts were), and X-linked. Men would have a much higher chance of being geniuses, but also a much higher chance of (non-disorder linked) being at the other end of the spectrum. Just a little hypothesis which will probably get me plenty of "flamebait". :)

  4. Not degraded, as much as.... on The Decline of Science and Technology in America · · Score: 1
    Has the modding system degraded this much?
    "Degraded" implies that it was better than this to start with. Eh.... not so much.
  5. Re:Cue on Top Level .xxx Domain Concept Under Scrutiny · · Score: 1
    At some point, when reality sets in

    For a timeline on this one, I'll guess about the same week as this problem gets solved...

  6. Dumbest. on ESRB Revokes San Andreas Rating · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    Non-GNAA.

    Post.

    Ever.

  7. Von Braun? on U.N. To Govern Internet? · · Score: 1

    I was thinking that Germany's rocket research in WWII probably led to most of it, since both the US and the Soviet Union took a whole bunch of scientists & documentation home with them after the fall of Berlin. (And even before that.)

  8. In dude's defense... on Next NASA Vehicles To Resemble Shuttles · · Score: 1

    He said nothing about where or what he did when he served. He could have been a cook in the Navy or a mechanic in the Air Force.

  9. The irony is.... on Next NASA Vehicles To Resemble Shuttles · · Score: 1
    And what's even sadder is apparently I'm not even allowed to say I think something is in poor taste without assholes like you and some others acting like I just am some ulta-offended, always PC, yuippity up.

    Now he acts offended.

  10. Well, sorta on Next NASA Vehicles To Resemble Shuttles · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The Space Shuttle orbiter weighs in at a whopping 104,000 kg! Combined with its cargo capacity, the Space Shuttle is capable of 132,800 kg to LEO! That's way more than the Saturn V could manage on all three stages. So if we ditch the orbiter itself, the shuttle's infrastructure could be the most powerful superbooster ever designed.

    You're leaving out the fact that a portion of the engine is built into the orbiter. I'm not sure exactly what it masses, but I'd take a guess it's bigger than the difference between 118,000 kg and 132,800 kg.

    On a totally unrelated note, why don't we use the rest of the metric scale when dealing with really big stuff?

  11. Nope, he's just... on Next NASA Vehicles To Resemble Shuttles · · Score: 3, Funny

    trying to exercise his constitutional right to never, ever be offended.

  12. That's just great on Next NASA Vehicles To Resemble Shuttles · · Score: 5, Insightful
    As such, while much of what is done by the existing infrastructure and workforce at KSC will be similar to what is done for the Space Shuttle system, it will likely require a much smaller workforce. While members of Congress from the space states will be happy to hear of a new launch system - one that retains some existing infrastructure - they will not be happy to hear that jobs will be lost.

    So, as always, (good science/actual military need/sensible budget-keeping (pick appropriate phrase based on article) ) takes a backseat to Senator Whosit saying, "You won't cost my state jobs!"

  13. Finagle already answered that one on Science's 125 Big Questions · · Score: 1

    through one of his prophets Niven - "The perversity of the universe tends towards a maximum"

  14. Hmmm.... on The Strange Energy Budget of Ethanol Production · · Score: 1
    [Lower energy loss means longer energy storage and more effective energy generation]
    Well,that's true... but even if there were no power losses in the power grid, we'd be saving less than 10%. (Check wikipedia).
  15. Maybe I'm reading too much into this... on U.S. Scientists Create Zombie Dogs · · Score: 1
    TFA claims that there's no damage to the dogs, but we can't know how their total lifespan is effected yet.

    But it seems to me like you're implying that before something gets tested on humans, they're going to dope up mice,dogs, & chimps with it... and then wait the average mice, dog, and chimp lifespan to see if their "total lifespan" is "effected"? For mice, sure, (18 months ain't too long), dogs, maybe (maybe not... 10 years a step is long), and chimps, well... no.

    Plus... okay, you started reading TFA, but... where the hell did you pull the egomaniac celebrities bit from? They pretty specifically state that this would be for a few hours, only... and they don't even "freeze" them.

    I mean, seriously.

  16. Bad analogy... on Death On Demand Drive Tech · · Score: 1
    Ebola kills almost every human, period. And it doesn't spread well outside of humans. So, yes, it is pretty self-limiting.

    However, to most computers in the world, this would appear to be a payload-less virus (or worm)- only the tiny percentage with this style of drive would notice any ill effects. (Besides possible bandwidth usage.)

  17. Test =! Calibrate on Mars Rovers Have Incorrect Instruments Installed · · Score: 1
    Obvious time to test is when you finish building the equipment, still in the manufacturer's lab, before shipping it out.

    Yes, that's the obvious time to test it to make sure it works within the manufacturer-guarenteed range. But the best time to try to calibrate it to a much smaller, more accurate range is when it's in the situation where it's going to be used. (Or as close as you can get it, since we didn't have the luxury of calibrating them after they landed on Mars.)

  18. I, for one... on Random Number Generator That Sees Into the Future · · Score: 1

    blame out new alien overlords. Or maybe our old alien overlords, I don't fucking know.

  19. One of my pet peeves... on Genetic Engineers Barking Up the Wrong Trees? · · Score: 2, Informative
    Is this particular "story".

    For example, the Americans spend millions to design a pen that will write in zero-g, the Russians use a pencil. The russians have an elegant solution, but the Americans now have a new understanding of chemistry, a new understanding of flow-dynamics, perhaps a new manufacturing process for fine detail, plus detailed experience of zero-G. The Russians have invested nothing and gained nothing in their solution.

    I know you didn't state it, but you implied it, and it's not true - NASA didn't spend any money to design these. And the Fisher pen company sold them to the Russian space program not too long after they began selling them to NASA.

  20. McCarthy? on U.S. Scientists Say They Are Told to Alter Finding · · Score: 1

    Is that you?

  21. Facts? We don't need no stinking facts... on Repair Costs for Hubble Are Vexing to Scientists · · Score: 1
    (Speaking of Hubble, and linking to an article about junk in orbit)

    You damn litter-bug

    Except for the fact that NASA has repeatedly stated if they can't afford to fix Hubble, they'll at least make sure it gets safely de-orbited.

  22. Not just one... on MGM's DVD Class Action Settlement · · Score: 1

    This seems to indicate that the DiCaprio movie is the third of the title. (The other two weren't about Howard Hughes, though.)

  23. As a bonus.... on NASA Prepares to Launch Comet-Buster · · Score: 1

    that impact may well be deep, and lasting. ;)

  24. WTF? on Weather Monitoring Frequencies Subject to Pollution · · Score: 1
    Why is this modded flamebait? Seriously, on a tech & science - savvy site, you'd think people would know the difference between good evidence & an anecdote.

    And, no, I'm not new here, I'm just thick-headed.

  25. Eh, well... sorta. on Australian Police Given Power To Use Spyware · · Score: 1
    You need to understand how anti-spyware software works. It doesn't automagically shield you from malware, nor does it inherently know what's a good program and what's a bad program. The reason you have to frequently update is because the human programmers do the grunt work of identifying malware and how to remove it, not the software itself.

    It depends on how exactly their spyware functions. If it's a separate executable that communicates with their servers, a software firewall that's set to check your permission before allowing programs to transmit anything would stop it, regardless of how it was set up. That could still be circumvented by the government telling firewall makers to make an exception for their software, but that's not quite the same thing as telling them not to work around it, eh?