Slashdot Mirror


NASA Prepares to Launch Comet-Buster

Chessphoon writes "NASA's Deep Impact, a spacecraft named after the 1998 movie, is scheduled to launch on January 12. If all goes as planned, the spacecraft will collide with Comet Tempel 1 six months later on July 4, and create a crater so that the inside of the comet can be analyzed."

207 comments

  1. Is it just me... by mstra · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...or is this the kind of thing that, if it happened in a movie, would cause an apocolypse brought on by our own hubris?

    Yes, I read TFA. I know that there is no danger. But those crazy scientists in the movies always think they are safe too.

    --
    Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    1. Re:Is it just me... by fred911 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      " I know that there is no danger"

      That's because you don't live there. What if we're too stupid to recognize a type of life that does?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B - D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0 45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    2. Re:Is it just me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      even though there is NO danger, the (Hollywood) movies which have shaped my social conscience hold more sway than any form of rational thought.

    3. Re:Is it just me... by mstra · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, if they're too stupid to have created movies to teach them to defend themselves against Bruce Willis, then they're better off being wiped out.

      --
      Photography, technology, and my dog Scout - http://mattstratton.com
    4. Re:Is it just me... by IO+ERROR · · Score: 1
      Yes, I read TFA. I know that there is no danger. But those crazy scientists in the movies always think they are safe too.

      This is real life. Real life is usually orders of magnitude less exciting than the movies. But if you're looking for a little danger, you can always walk around Harlem naked. It's a pretty sure bet that shortly after that, either you will impact something, or something will impact you.

      --
      How am I supposed to fit a pithy, relevant quote into 120 characters?
    5. Re:Is it just me... by LWATCDR · · Score: 1

      "That's because you don't live there. What if we're too stupid to recognize a type of life that does?"
      Well if there is life it must be pretty board living on a frozen rock. The is the most exciting thing to happen to that comet in a long time. I am sure thier news network will love it.

      --
      See my blog http://ilovecookes.blogspot.com/ for light hearted technical information.
    6. Re:Is it just me... by xSauronx · · Score: 2, Funny
      They were quite entitled to make any suggestions or protests at the apporpriate time, you know....

      The plans were announced months ago...

      Well...but the plans were on display, on the internet even, surely they have access to the internet out there....

      Yes the Earth internet...

      Yes we're some distance away and all....

      Look they haven't even tried to find the plans...

      It's not as if it's a particularly nice rock...

      Oh they'll love the crater!

      --
      By and large, language is a tool for concealing the truth. -- George Carlin
    7. Re:Is it just me... by aminorex · · Score: 3, Funny

      i TRIED to explain there was intelligent life on the wet rock, but nobody believed me. i shouldn't have admitted that it was made of meat. then they might have at least checked out my story, but when i tried to explain that there was animated intelligent meat living on a warm rock by Sol, that it had cultures, art, even songs (singing meat?) well, i wouldn't have believed it either if i hadn't seen it myself.
      the new hyperdrive bypass goes through on tuesday.
      so long, singing meat people.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    8. Re:Is it just me... by boaworm · · Score: 1
      What if we're too stupid to recognize a type of life that does? After seeing too much star trek, I kind of admit there might be some very strange life form there. Altough, that is VERY unlikely, simply because there is no:
      • Atmosphere
      • Oxygien
      • Water
      • Jean Luc Picard
      Show me one or two of those, and i'd be willing to talk :-)
      --
      Probable impossibilities are to be preferred to improbable possibilities.
      Aristotele
  2. Cool Idea by Aldirn · · Score: 0

    That's going to be interesting to see.

    1. Re:Cool Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, thanks for your meaningful contribution to the discussion.

  3. What a waste of money by albn · · Score: 1

    IMO, why waste money to see the content of a comet? There are so many better things to learn and explore in this great cosmos of ours.

    I really think they will be sorely disappointed when they discover the comet is really some rock covered with ice.

    --
    Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
    1. Re:What a waste of money by dustinbarbour · · Score: 1

      So many better things to study.. why go to the moon? It's a dead rock.

    2. Re:What a waste of money by rpozz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Maybe the technology could be used to take a comet off-course when it's about to hit something we don't want it to (eg Earth)?

    3. Re:What a waste of money by Free_Meson · · Score: 4, Funny

      IMO, why waste money to see the content of a comet? There are so many better things to learn and explore in this great cosmos of ours.

      I bet there's a tootsie pop in the middle and we'll still be left pondering that eternal question: how many licks does it take to get to the middle of a tootsie pop?

    4. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just for training and creating a waypoint before going to Titan, because THIS one is still a mystery like the hell. And of course for Hellium-3. Hellium-3=Profit!

    5. Re:What a waste of money by albn · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Why did we go to the moon? It was a political "mine is bigger than yours" game. Also, we want to send miners up there to compensate for dwindling natural resources. How is that going to cost effective?

      --
      Some call me Howie Feltersnatch
    6. Re:What a waste of money by drakethegreat · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think you are thinking about it the wrong way. NASA doesn't like to spend more money to send crafts over 1000 times the distance or greater (where other comets might be) but rather would spend money on analyzing a comet right near by. It saves them money actually and because they have never seen the comet up close its possible that its something besides just a big rock. NASA is full of optimists who think that something amazing to learn could be anywhere in the cosmos so they will take the time to look at anything they can. Waste of time, I don't think so.

    7. Re:What a waste of money by Batte · · Score: 1

      So what if it turns out there are hidden WMDs in there?

    8. Re:What a waste of money by jakuis · · Score: 0

      IMO, why waste money to see the content of a comet? There are so many better things to learn and explore in this great cosmos of ours.

      I think research like this can some day save our asses. Should one of those big ones be headed straight at us, the more info we have about it in advance, the better.

    9. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could use that money to better society, education, health care and stamp out hunger. The farther one look into the stars the less they will see their own people.

    10. Re:What a waste of money by jericho4.0 · · Score: 1
      You think maybe they expect to find out it's a gigantic tamale covered in sour cream?

      _Any_ data about the interior of a comet would be informative, and will incfluence theories about the formation of the solar sytem.

      --
      "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
    11. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hellium is the stuff of nightmares.

      Also shouldn't that be....

      1: Launch cometbuster-2: Collect Helium-3: Profit!

      [Groan]

    12. Re:What a waste of money by Mr2cents · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I have a better idea: why don't you divert money meant for the military to that worthy cause and stop whining about some millions spent on a space probe? Billions and billions are spent each day developing and building weapons. Incidentally, most misery on earth is caused by war (eg, famines are often caused by long wars causing farmers to stop cultivating the land).

      You could also split it 50/50 between humanitary aid and space programs, you could still solve most if not all diseases and famine, while launching a mission like the two mars rovers EVERY DAY!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    13. Re:What a waste of money by Lotana · · Score: 1

      why waste money to see the content of a comet? Well, we need to get those giant ice cubes to battle global warming from somewhere!

    14. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Exploring space... ...is a waste...

    15. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They're going to launch a 370kg mass at it, to form a crater (and study it during/after).

      Without knowing it's mass, etc. I can't be sure how much it'll affect it, but I doubt it would be too significant. My point is, while you could try greater masses, every kg counts when attempting a launch/manuevering in space (yeah you got it up, now try getting it to hit that moving rock over there). It quickly becomes impractical to use this kind of deflection method - if you're attempting a deflection, it's probably going to be against something heavy, or else why bother?.

      There are possible methods though.

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asteroid_deflection

    16. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BTW That includes "building" the mass in space IMO.

    17. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent idea! We should ALL suffer because of those who choose not to support themselves. Of course, I mean MORE than we already do.

    18. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      We've killed two birds with one stone. (j/k)

    19. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comet exploration is very important. If our civilization ever moves into mining the our solar systems, comets could be an important source of volatiles such as hydrogen, oxygen, nitrogen and carbon. The first two could be used to make rocket fuel in-situ. All combined a comet may have the resources to keep a good space colony well supplied in much needed resources.

      Additionally, this type of research will give us a good view of the materials that make up the Oort cloud, thus helping us to understand how our solar system developed.

    20. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aaha...then we can build a gaint licking rocket.

    21. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but then the enviromental lobby would complain about littering. :-)

    22. Re:What a waste of money by bungalow · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Incidentally, most misery on earth is caused by war (eg, famines are often caused by long wars causing farmers to stop cultivating the land).

      No. War is a symptom. It exacerbates the problem, but it is not the problem.

      Most misery on earth is caused by selfishness. Uncontrolled selfishness between two humans will often lead to either a fistfight or exclusion of the other person.

      War is either a fistfight (WWII) or a hissy fit (cold war and its multiple unofficial wars) fought for leaders of nations who are pissed off at each other for verious reasons (some unjust, some just).

    23. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm??? One theory, still under discussion, is that life on Earth was originated by amino acids and other elements found on meteors and comets that impacted the planet, one article. Experiments have already shown that these elements can survive the re-entry and impact forces, what's left is to see if these elements actually exist on comets. This probe may do that.

      Waste of money? Not a chance. It's a bit sad to see that NASA is using such a brute force approach. But this can be very crucial in answering the origins of life on Earth, and the probability that it exists on other planets.

    24. Re:What a waste of money by nxtr · · Score: 1

      How many licks does it take to get to the inside of a comet?

    25. Re:What a waste of money by uncoveror · · Score: 1

      NASA is hoping this comet probe works out better than the last one, CONTOUR. It will work only if the aliens let it.

      --
      The Uncoveror: It's the real news.
    26. Re:What a waste of money by helioquake · · Score: 1

      Exploration and investment are the reasons for a mission like this.

      The former -- exploration -- is what NASA and scientists will advertise in front. Why? Because we know so little about comets. Imagine, if the judgement day comes and we have to "shoot down" one of these in order to save the humanity, wouldn't you be rather comfortable to know what and how comets are really made of? We really do not know what happens to a comet when we toss a stick of dynamite into it, as its structural integrity is not well known.

      The latter -- investment -- is the second and the foremost important reason. In order for a super-power nation to sustain its technological supremacy in this world, its government must invest its money for the advancement of engineering and science [*]. The investment to a NASA's mission like this may not seem as important as an investment toward curing cancer, etc., but such assessment is near-sighted. For example, building of a scientific instrument requires a miniaturization of electronic component (in order to reduce its size and weight). Each component is also certified to withstand harsh cosmic environment (sudden changes in temperature and severe bombardment by cosmic radiation). The skills learned through these R&D may eventually trickle down to the industry, and hence possibly leading to development of affordable high-tech components (e.g., IC chips in a decade ago). Basically the high cost of R&D may be paid by the government and the industry would benefit from such learned knowledge. It is not too surprising that a medical breakthrough on cancer may come from the spread of affordable technology obtained through space research.

      [*] There was no time in history that a single nation had dominated the world without its technological advantage.

      But at the bottom line, the choice is up to you and other constituents in the nation. You ask your representatives to choose either to feed the hungry right now or to invest on the future. I'm inclined to choose the latter.

    27. Re:What a waste of money by mabinogi · · Score: 1

      There is more than enough food in the world to stamp out hunger already. The problem is not an economic one.

      Space exploration _does_ better education and society, through a better understanding of the universe.
      Better education and understanding of the universe then has a flow on effect towards better health and stamping out hunger.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    28. Re:What a waste of money by adeydas · · Score: 1

      We are optimistic about it too but what exactly do they wish to find besides rocks and dust!

    29. Re:What a waste of money by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      Well argumented!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    30. Re:What a waste of money by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      How is that going to cost effective?

      It will be, just not anytime soon. Don't get caught in the trap of always thinking what is here and now is all there is.

      Spend a moment and think on the scale technology has driven forward in the past 200 years. We have gone from living in the dark at night, without climate control, to sending people to the moon and mechanical drones to Mars.

      Quantum computing and nanotech are going to hit eventually. If not one of those, then it is likely someone will stumble on something completely missed by the entire mass of humanity and change the world again. Or, of course, we could just all die out due to a disaster at any given moment...

    31. Re:What a waste of money by omeomi · · Score: 1

      I have a better idea: why don't you divert money meant for the military to that worthy cause and stop whining about some millions spent on a space probe?

      Ooh, here's an idea...how's about we dissolve the military, and spend the money on, oh, say...education? And yes, on science, and ooh...how's about healthcare? It sure would be nice not to have to spend an assload of money on health insurance, and then still have them not pay 100% of dr. bills...

    32. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      IMO, why waste money to see the content of a comet? There are so many better things to learn and explore in this great cosmos of ours.

      I bet there's a tootsie pop in the middle

      "My God...it's full of stars!"

    33. Re:What a waste of money by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

      That's the idea! It's already working in parts of the world, you know!

      --
      "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    34. Re:What a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, war can cause much misery, however as the tsunamis have shown, natural disasters can sometimes be worse. How many people are belived to be dead and suffering from the tsunamis and earthquakes? Compare that to the number of people dead and suffering due to war last year...

    35. Re:What a waste of money by drakethegreat · · Score: 1

      That is the point of my post. They hope to find that which is not known. Every rock is different and you never know if the next one will have something previously never seen before by human eyes.

  4. Price is right? by Everguide · · Score: 0

    And how much did it cost this time? NASA really should be run more like a corporation instead of a Government organization. They spend 300 million on what a company could build with 30 million. www.gameguidesonline.com

    1. Re:Price is right? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      What does gameguidesonline have to do with NASA?

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    2. Re:Price is right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      d00d, didn't you ever play Sid Meyer's NASA back in the day? I could always advance a few ages, but them damn ruskies caught up to me eventually EVERY TIME!

    3. Re:Price is right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's his sig.

    4. Re:Price is right? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why do people still insist that there is a difference between "BIG BUSINESS" and the "government" that we currently have in this and many other countries?

      Are we not being currently run like a company, wasn't that touted when we elected (selected if you like) the first "CEO" president/Harvard Business school graduate? Do you ACTUALLY think that the "government" is building and running these programs? Those government workers are actually getting the bloated paychecks? It's BIG BUSINESS! And, the last time I checked, the two largest government run agencies or programs made a profit last year - the good ole' U.S. Post Office (THEY want to privatize it, darn, if it could only lose money for a while) and Social Security, which never missed a payment, has enough money to maintain solvency to 2052 (and then would still be able to meet obligations up to 80% of it's current payments) and has been the most successful GOVERNMENT program in history (ask all the presidents from LBJ to Baby Bush who have "borrowed" and left IOUs and continued to borrow from the system). Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know the argument is that it is a part of the general fund, therefore the money can be use for any purpose. But tell me this, how can we use the money for the General Fund when it's there, yet not help out the program FROM the general Fund when it needs it? Why does it then have to stand alone as a self-funding program?) To continue, both these programs are genuinely for the greater good of society. And both are being targeted for privatization. Along with all the overgrown, hazardous trees that are causing all the fire hazards in our National Parks. Yes, BIG BUSINESS would run it better. And before you go point to the example of the Millau bridge in France being built with "private" funds and for only an estimated 394m euros ($524 U.S.), instead of the billions that that the erstwhile Bay Bridge is costing in San Francisco. Remember your fables: "The devil WILL get is due!" The company(s) that built the bridge have a contract for 75 years to collect fees. How many times will this private corporation raise fees? What happens when it can't meet its obligation to repair the bridge, because their calculated fees aren't high enough or the public balks at paying them? Will the "government" then simply close the bridge? No, they will come in and "bail" out this private "BIG BUSINESS" to keep the bridge safe and operating. Instead of letting this private sector enterprise simply fail. Just ask the "private, BIG BUSINESS" airlines in the U.S.

      Sorry for the rant, but of course business is a part of the success of the U.S. and the world, not the end-all and be-all. It has always been thought of as a partnership. That is why the founders of this "democracy" put such constraints on commerce; they saw the dangers as well as the reward. Unfortunately, BIG BUSINESS as risen to such heights, that more than likely, it will choke on it's own greed and take the rest of us with it.

      Regards, A small business owner!

    5. Re:Price is right? by WhatAmIDoingHere · · Score: 1

      Is it? Why was it on the same line as the body of his post?

      If it's his sig, he should either use the built in sig option under "Preferences" or at least put it a line down.

      --
      Not a Twitter sockpuppet... but I wish I was.
    6. Re:Price is right? by pnewhook · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You completely miss the point of NASAs existence.

      Of course things cost more when NASA does it because the purpose of NASA is to take government money and spread it out to as many other companies as possible. Without this, companies such as Boeing, Lockheed Martin and numerous other aerospace companies big and small would never exist (or be radically different).

      This is a method to keep engineers, scientists, average joe workers, and the thousands of other workers that provide related services and materials to them employed. Doing something interesting with that money is completely secondary.

      Some other countries choose to give direct subsidies to their high tech companies. Americans seem to frown or this so the government chooses to get NASA to do it indirectly.

      --
      Tesla was a genius. Edison however was a overrated hack who liked to torture puppies.
  5. Stop the Violence by knapper_tech · · Score: 5, Funny

    What if the comets retaliate by impacting Earth?

    --
    "There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell them." ~ Louis Armstrong
    1. Re:Stop the Violence by Roland+Piquepaille · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then Earth will form the Coalition of the Willing, composed of the United States, Tonga, Estonia, Palau, the Marshall Islands, Micronesia, Samoa (and Poland, you forgot Poland!) and will send interplanetary missiles on Venus, because Venus provided support to the cometian terrorists...

    2. Re:Stop the Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you a member of the Film Actors Guild?

    3. Re:Stop the Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Poland is pulling out.

    4. Re:Stop the Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI.

    5. Re:Stop the Violence by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

      What if the comets retaliate by impacting Earth?

      The dinosaurs tried the same thing in 60,000,000 B.C., and look what happened to them.

    6. Re:Stop the Violence by MacGod · · Score: 3, Funny

      Then Earth will form the Coalition of the Willing..... and will send interplanetary missiles on Venus, because Venus provided support to the cometian terrorists...

      So, you're saying there's oil in the comets?

      --
      "Reality is merely an illusion, albeit a very persistent one " -Albert Einstein
    7. Re:Stop the Violence by snake_dad · · Score: 1

      Comets impacting Earth have given us water. It's one of the prime factors enabling us to exist. Anyway, thusfar comets have been hitting us lots more than we have been hitting them. It's about time for some revenge :)

      --
      karma capped .sig seeking available Slashdot poster for long-term relationship.
    8. Re:Stop the Violence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    9. Re:Stop the Violence by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Then we'll counter-retaliate! Kill 'em all and let God sort 'em out! Damn godless comets...

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
    10. Re:Stop the Violence by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "The dinosaurs tried the same thing in 60,000,000 B.C., and look what happened to them."

      In all seriousness it would be cool to avert a catastrophe that the dinos couldn't. It'd prove we've actually evolved!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    11. Re:Stop the Violence by aminorex · · Score: 1

      No, I'm saying the comets refer to Israel as "the Zionist entity". That's grounds for life imprisonment without trial in Guantanamo -- or a few nukes.

      --
      -I like my women like I like my tea: green-
    12. Re:Stop the Violence by mbbac · · Score: 1

      No, but there is oil in Venus.

      --

      mbbac

  6. Do your homework... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The NASA project was *not* named after the movie. Read http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/01/01/comet.bus ter.ap/index.html
    for the real story.

    1. Re:Do your homework... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      The NASA project was *not* named after the movie... It was named after a p0rn fantasy.

    2. Re:Do your homework... by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      the link doesn't really say anything to one way or another about it.

      and really... would you believe that ASIMO isn't named after asimov just because some pr folkster said so?

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:Do your homework... by Ian+Jefferies · · Score: 1

      I'd like to see the PR try it for ASIMO 5.

      --
      A physicist is an atom's way of thinking about atoms
    4. Re:Do your homework... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://www.cnn.com/2005/TECH/space/01/01/comet.bus ter.ap/index.html

      Please visit Slashcode bug #981137, which concerns automatically hyperlinking URLs in "Plain Old Text" mode, and add a comment to show your support for a speedy resolution. No progress has been made on this trivial feature request for longer than six months.

  7. More information.... by NOT-2-QUICK · · Score: 2, Informative

    From a previous slashdot article.

    --
    Beer is proof that God loves us and wants us to be happy. -- Benjamin Franklin
  8. NOT named after the movie by GabrielF · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The mission is NOT named after the movie, the project manager claims that they came up with the name independently at around the same time. However, members of the team also served as consultants on the movie.

  9. Nothing to see here. Please move along. by SilentChris · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh dear god! They smashed the spaceship into Slashdot!

  10. The aliens have got a little list by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
    And in six months, they've going to come and look for all of you!
    Deep Impact's larger flyby spacecraft will carry a smaller impactor spacecraft to Tempel 1 for release into the comet's path for a planned collision. The flyby spacecraft will take pictures as the 370-kilogram (816 pound) copper-tipped impactor plunges into Tempel 1 at about 37,000 kilometers (22,990 miles) per hour. The impactor is expected to make a spectacular, football field-sized crater, seven to 15 stories deep, in the speeding comet. Carried aboard the impactor will be a standard mini-CD containing the names of comet, space and other enthusiasts from around the world.
    Hopefully they won't be too pissed off. Maybe just an alien wedgie or something?
    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:The aliens have got a little list by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      What? No AOL (Aliens On Line) CD?

    2. Re:The aliens have got a little list by MikeyToo · · Score: 1

      No, they put a CD with a lot of people's names on it. Maybe I wasn't so bright adding my daughter's name to the list. The cometites might get pissed and blame it on her.

      --
      "Well Ranger Brad, I'm a scientist. I don't believe in anything." - Dr. Roger Fleming
    3. Re:The aliens have got a little list by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All my family have signed up for this, and as its launch grows nearer its getting exciting.
      This may be the only way I can get into space, so jumped at the chance when offered last year.

      Its also good for my son, who can show all his class the certificate hes got for signing up.

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    4. Re:The aliens have got a little list by Segfault666 · · Score: 1

      'my name was on a cd that smashed into a comet'
      that's a phenomenal life accomplishment.

      lets now strive for ...
      'oh my god, leonardo di caprio looked at me'
      'i've gone one whole year without wearing matching socks' ...

    5. Re:The aliens have got a little list by LiquidCoooled · · Score: 1

      OMG!

      Segfault666 replied to me!!!
      I'll never click refresh again.

      I do know what you mean though, but I have to keep my feet kindof on the ground, the areas I am aiming for do not involve space missions :)

      --
      liqbase :: faster than paper
    6. Re:The aliens have got a little list by tarkas · · Score: 1

      Carried aboard the impactor will be a standard mini-CD containing the names of comet, space and other enthusiasts from around the world. ...and will be converted to plasma, along with the impactor, on impact. Nice gesture - whatever.

      -Me

    7. Re:The aliens have got a little list by AndroidCat · · Score: 1
      Lord High Executioner; in a speech immediately preceding the song, he says "If I should ever be called upon to act professionally, I am happy to think that there will be no difficulty in finding plenty of people whose loss will be a distinct gain to society at large."
      Too bad we can't convert some people to plasma by slaming them into a comet (for science). Darl McBride and Al Ralsky would be at the head of my little list. (You may put 'em on the list--you may put 'em on the list; And they'll none of 'em be missed--they'll none of 'em be missed!)
      --
      One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  11. I'm placing my bets now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Twenty bucks says by some freak accident of nature, the commet ends up hitting Earth.

    1. Re:I'm placing my bets now... by rpozz · · Score: 1

      $1,000,000 says it doesn't.

  12. 1998 movie...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Deep Impact.

    Was Tara Reid in that?

    1. Re:1998 movie...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Téa Leoni. Much less stupid. Of course, it would have been better still with Natalie Portman.

    2. Re:1998 movie...? by Jediman1138 · · Score: 1

      it would have been better still with Natalie Portman...covered in hot grits, of course

      --

      nothing.can.stop.me.now

    3. Re:1998 movie...? by Daverd · · Score: 1

      I read that as Natalie Portman...covered in hot girls, of course.

      I was about to mod it -1, Redundant.

  13. When a comet is on a collision... by rarose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    course with earth and we have to figure out how to nudge it off course, the data this mission gathers will be invaluable.

    The ass we save may be our own.

    --
    --Rob
  14. Corpsicle by vveak · · Score: 1, Funny

    I created the Event Horizon to reach the stars, but she's gone much, much farther than that. She tore a whole in our universe, a gateway to another dimension, a dimension of pure chaos, pure evil

    1. Re:Corpsicle by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1
      I created the Event Horizon to reach the stars, but she's gone much, much farther than that. She tore a whole in our universe, a gateway to another dimension, a dimension of pure chaos, pure evil

      Yeah? We created Lawrence Fishburne, aka "Cowboy Curtiss," aka "Othello," aka "Morpheus," and we say he's gonna whoop that bitch-ass "Event Horizon" all the way to Pluto. Oh yeah.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  15. If she was... by rarose · · Score: 1

    it'd take a bigger impact for her to feel it.

    [thunk] [thunk] [thunk] Any nerves not insulated by silicone?

    --
    --Rob
  16. Microbes at the scene: by dj245 · · Score: 1

    Uh-oh, better call Maaco!

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
    1. Re:Microbes at the scene: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, they just need some Peelable Auto Paint

      http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=05/01/02/233325 4&from=rss

  17. Given their track record by fuzzy12345 · · Score: 5, Funny

    NASA should have considered planning this mission to be a near-flyby. Given their record of hitting what they aim to miss and missing what they aim to hit...

    --

    Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
    1. Re:Given their track record by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      -1 Troll

  18. Maybe.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    They should get the ESA to oversee/launch this mission. They seem to have no problem impacting their spacecraft.

    smile

  19. payload revealed by deft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wheras the pioneer spacecraft carried media of human genome, voices, sounds, animals, how the world workewd, this mission needed to crater a giant comet.

    Therefore, the media stored on board consists of Gigli, Ishtar, Hudson hawk, Battlefield Earth, and The Adventures of Pluto Nash.

    --

    There's nothing Intelligent about Intelligent Design.
    1. Re:payload revealed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, the mission is just to make a big hole, not utterly destroy it!

    2. Re:payload revealed by rzebram · · Score: 1

      Gah, blasphemy! Don't compare Gigli to Pluto Nash... Gigli is the base to which we all calibrate our suck barometers, and Pluto Nash is just... different.

  20. Tunguska? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that was a big one :)

  21. it wasnt named AFTER the movie by cheekyboy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Can the editors get a clue, as said in other articles else where on the net, the name DEEP IMPACT was determined about the same time as the movie title was, but was 100% a coincedence and not chosen because of a movie.

    Yes a small anal point, but jeez, you guys fail basic Journalism 101 class dudes.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:it wasnt named AFTER the movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deep impact? anal?... argh! it's Goatse: The Movie!

    2. Re:it wasnt named AFTER the movie by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      . . . you guys fail basic Journalism 101 class dudes.

      Of course.. that's why they're posting on slashdot :)

      --
      Ryan

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
    3. Re:it wasnt named AFTER the movie by 1u3hr · · Score: 1

      It's becoming almost compulsory to make some fatuous, inappropriate movie reference to get your articles posted on Slashdot these days (eg, the "James Bond" peelable paint -- not a fucking word about James Bond in TFA, of course). And in this one, "Comet-Buster": it's NOT going to "bust" the comet; it'll smack into it all right, but that's all. The editors seem to be as easily amused and deceived as an average 9-year-od.

    4. Re:it wasnt named AFTER the movie by mogalpha · · Score: 1

      Was this really informative?... sounds somewhat troll'y to me, but eh, what do I know, I don't have any mod points or anything.

  22. And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by hh1000 · · Score: 1

    What a great gesture of intergallactic diplomacy.

    We send out a spacecraft with a plaque theorizing someone could intercept it. Do we think hurling a bomb is any less likely to be found by an alien civilization?

    1. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do we think hurling a bomb is any less likely to be found by an alien civilization?

      The 370kg load is not explosive IIRC.

      Hypothetically speaking, an alien civilization is quite a lot more likely to "find" us hurling the probe (through incident photons) than actually be on the receiving end (even if it did miss its target). So the answer is a resounding NO. :-)

    2. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      You see, objects have to obey this nice thing called gravity. No matter how many times you may have heard it, you could not throw a baseball to the moon from orbit (Though a big enough railgun could do it...). Things are not weightless in space, that is just an illusion created when falling. Throwing a baseball from the shuttle, for example, would give it a slightly diffrent orbit, but it wouldn't drift off into the unknown. It may even come back and hit you a few orbits later. If this thing missed, the impactor (which isn't a bomb) would likely drift around in solar orbit for all eternity (well, a few million years, at least).

    3. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      Gah, left html formatting on.

      Its not THAT bad, parse it anyway. C'mon, you can do it!

    4. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Things are weightless in space unless under rotation or thrust. They retain their mass. See difference.

      There are very low delta-v paths between points in the solar system. These are known as the interplanetary superhighway. You'd throw the baseball at a very specific speed and direction, it would enter a slightly different orbit, and gradually, over the course of very many orbits it would interact harmonically with the moon's orbit, widening it's orbit slightly on each pass. Eventually, it would pass through an unstable Lagrange point, and have a wide variety of paths to choose from, including paths that wound up in Lunar orbit. These paths are very slow, but useful to unmanned probes.

      Couldn't let all of Nerull's misinformation stand.

    5. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by aeroelastic · · Score: 1

      Things are not weightless in space, that is just an illusion created when falling

      Hate to burst your bubble, but things truly are weightless in space. Mass is constant, weight depends on gravity. And I don't really understand what this sentence means anyway. Maybe you should look up how orbits and physics really works.

      /Aero-Mech. Engineer

      --
      "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
    6. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Junta · · Score: 1

      Since in space things orbit other things, it means things are experiencing gravitational forces, and therefore, in some reference frame, weigh something. Maybe they don't weigh much, but if things in space were truly weightless, they wouldn't be in orbit. If he said things are not massless, that would've been meaningless to his point about drifting. If something is truly weightless, it would mean it experiences absolutely 0 gravitational force. It may feel weightless, and it is about as weightless as it gets, but it is not truly weightless.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    7. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by aeroelastic · · Score: 1

      I think I understand your point, and I would agree that gravity is still acting on something in orbit. However, the centripedal force (from orbiting) is equal to the force of gravity, so that the net force is zero. Remember, weight is a force measurement (e.g. pounds of force or Newtons). Mass is measured in pounds of mass or kilograms.

      It's good you mentioned reference frame, because that is very important. In the reference frame of the orbit in space, placing a baseball on a scale (also in orbit) would read as no weight. However it would also still hurt if it hit you, because the mass is the same.

      Space can be a real pain to get your mind around sometimes. Space-time gives me headaches.

      --
      "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
    8. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      I was attempting not to be confusing, but I'm never very good at that.

      What I ment was gravity does not just stop having an effect. Many people think that if you took a baseball in the shuttle, and shoved it away from earth, it would keep drifting away from earth. (Imparting enough dV to send the baseball to escape velocity doesn't count, but that would be one hell of an arm.)

      In this case, rather than a baseball, its a probe. The rules still apply.

      Of course, you know that, but many don't.

    9. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by aeroelastic · · Score: 1

      I also wasn't clear in my reply, my internet/asshole instinct took over. Yeah, if you just took a baseball strait up into space and tried to throw it, it would fall back down. I was talking more about in an orbit, since you are spinning that would help throw the ball into space.

      I was trying to be informative. My intent was not to cause further confusion, a task at which I failed miserably.

      --
      "It doesn't take a rocket scientist" -I guess I should leave then
    10. Re:And if it misses what will it eventually hit? by Nerull · · Score: 1

      I was talking about orbit, and a few million years of lunar pertubations notwithstanding, it wouldn't leave orbit (I'm talking about throwing it here, not using a cannon, though ~7km/s to ~10-11km/s is a bit much for it too).

      Ive heard people say things like "Why don't they just take it out of the airlock and shove it toward earth..." about the ISS junk pile problem, for example. Thats the kind of thing I was trying to explain.

  23. you must be a jock by cheekyboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because if all comets are NOT ice, but just normal asteroids that generate massive plasma/electric charges, then that changes *ALL* theories on how the earth/solar system was evolved, and that throws out other derived theories, and then it makes more new ones, which would lead to more discoveries and finally allowing you to get your anti-gravity device to get to the moon. OK.

    --
    Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
    1. Re:you must be a jock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      then that changes *ALL* theories on how the earth/solar system was evolved, and that throws out other derived theories, and then it makes more new ones, which would lead to more discoveries and finally allowing you to get your anti-gravity device to get to the moon. OK.

      But will it get you laid?

    2. Re:you must be a jock by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh my god...

  24. Beagle 2? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Create a crater? Is this what the British were trying to do with Beagle 2? It all makes sense now...

  25. Gosh, NASA scientists watch movies too by xant · · Score: 0
    First paragraph:
    The spacecraft is called Deep Impact just like the 1998 movie about a comet headed straight for Earth.
    Nothing else in the article says how it was named. Don't be silly, of course it was named after the movie. You think somebody at NASA right now is going, "Gosh, what a coincidence! Who knew Hollywood made a movie of the same name about flying out to a space rock."
    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:Gosh, NASA scientists watch movies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From about halfway through the article:
      No matter what, fans of the 1998 disaster film can rest easy. (Coincidentally, the movie and spacecraft people hit on the same name independent of each another, at about the same time.)
    2. Re:Gosh, NASA scientists watch movies too by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummm... You need to read the entire article.

      Look further down.

      "No matter what, fans of the 1998 disaster film can rest easy. (Coincidentally, the movie and spacecraft people hit on the same name independent of each another, at about the same time.)"

  26. Re:first willis by cybertears · · Score: 1

    Bruce Willis was in Armageddon, not Deep Impact.

  27. "NASA's Deep Impact, a spacecraft named after the 1998 movie"

    ...and next year the "Preparation H" will probe an asteroid. It will be the first spacecraft in history entirely covered in latex.

  28. Hi Mr. Comet by StarWreck · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    [satelite]Hi Mr. Comet! How are you today?

    [comet] Fine... who are you?

    [satelite]*points* Look! Its the good-year blimp!

    [Comet] Huh?! Where?

    [satelite]*BOOM*!!!

    --
    ... and in the DRM, bind them.
  29. Oh, great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now I have that lame ghostbusters song in my head.

  30. If only linux was there... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    That piece of shit OS would crash itself into the comet.

  31. Will they never learn...? by tygerstripes · · Score: 4, Funny
    Carried aboard the impactor will be a standard mini-CD containing the names of comet, space and other enthusiasts from around the world.
    Now look, we all remember hearing back in the '80s how you could run a truck over a CD, cover it in jam and use it as a teething-ring and still get it to play, but it's just not true!!!

    Send an I-pod instead. That might survive. If it doesn't get stolen en-route.

    --
    Meta will eat itself
  32. The deep impact movie by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That movie sucked. I hope that isn't an indicator on how the mission will go.

  33. Crew Suggestions - Michael Jackson & Fritz Hol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Michael Jackson (who can pay his own way) Chuck Norris, Rush Limbaugh J-Low, and that guy with the high pitched voice.

  34. Re:Crew Suggestions - Michael Jackson & Fritz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chris Tucker?

  35. Biological loading by dj245 · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they will send it up squeakey clean biologically or if they will let it fly full of microbes so that we can have a chance at seeding another planet with our wonderfully fruity DNA.

    --
    Even those who arrange and design shrubberies are under considerable economic stress at this period in history.
  36. From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend dept by roman_mir · · Score: 5, Funny

    She thinks that the NASA is just hiding the fact that the comet is about to hit us and is dangerous so they decided to blow it up but masked the attempt as a scientific experiment.

    (and before you, smartasses, ask me, yes, she is a girl :)

  37. Re:Un-Funny Military Applications: China and NASA by Dasch · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Dude, the cold war is over. My bet is that half of your computer hardware was manufactured in Taiwan.

    You Americans are the only ones that believe we (the western, "democratic" nations) actually need that thing...

  38. Because they can? by Gorffy · · Score: 1, Insightful

    So, blow up a chunk of what we expect to be ice and rock... just to confirm that it is, indeed. Ice and rock. Maybe it's magic space rock! i think this project might just be:
    a.) a geologists wet dream
    b.) a way for nasa to prove it can do something right, and get more money. (1.) Shoot missle at comet. 2.)?? 3.) Government Funding!)

    The Titan project (forget the name) is far better.

    1. Re:Because they can? by TheGavster · · Score: 1

      Well, provided that you kept people with, like, knowledge out of the room, you could spin a success with this thing as a demonstration of how we can make a missle shield.

      --
      "Because Science" is one step from "Because old book". Try "Because of my experiment testing my falsifiable assertion".
    2. Re:Because they can? by FleaPlus · · Score: 1

      As it stands, we really don't know what's under the surface when it comes to comets and other extraterrestrial objects. This probe will let us find out.

      This is of great interest from a basic research perspective, but after our relative close call with MN 2004 the more practical applications of this should be obvious.

    3. Re:Because they can? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (1.) Shoot missle at comet. 2.)?? 3.) Government Funding!)

      2.. annouce all comets as terrorist threats.

  39. Obligatory obscure movie quote by EEBaum · · Score: 1

    "If it's done safely, therapeutically, there's no danger involved."

    --
    -- I prefer the term "karma escort."
  40. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by roman_mir · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    by the way, she is rubbing her breasts against myself right now, and it feels good, and at the same time she is licking my ear and at the same time she is coming up with this cool shit and .... I am going....

  41. Re:Un-Funny Military Applications: China and NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SDI Was not put in place to combat the cold war, SDI was recently developed and not in any related way to the cold war. So Dude, you easteren people must be the only people that somehow think america is invincible and an endless well of money.

  42. Well... by lxt · · Score: 1

    I'm going to assume you meant by the comet crashing into a planet, and isn't it a creditable belief that some of the material responsible for life on earth was brought by comets? Perhaps a alien civilisation's equivalent of this probe was the basis for the entire of life on Earth? :)

    On a slightly more serious note, all NASA space gear is assembled in a clean room, and they do almost everything they can to prevent microbes from contaminating equipment.

    1. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn I guess I shouldn't have stuck that test tupe up my ass then

  43. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by vigilology · · Score: 1

    Modded as funny, but it could equally be insightful.

  44. And Twenty Minutes Later... by Master+of+Transhuman · · Score: 2, Funny

    the nanotech civilization living on the comet wipes Earth off the Solar System...

    With luck, they'll be more precise about it and just wipe out the US government.

    Well, we can hope...

    --
    Richard Steven Hack - This sig is TOO GODDAMN SHORT TO DO ANYTHING USEFUL WITH! MORONS!
    1. Re:And Twenty Minutes Later... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      With luck, they'll be more precise about it and just wipe out the US government.

      After stating that, Mr. Trans, just try getting on an airplane now without having to take your pants off and getting a free medical exam. Welcome to The Database, the precursor to you know what.

    2. Re:And Twenty Minutes Later... by Legion303 · · Score: 1

      "just try getting on an airplane now without having to take your pants off and getting a free medical exam."

      Don't laugh, that's the only option for the millions of us without health insurance.

      Why, I had to hide my son in the carry-on luggage so we could get an x-ray of his leg and make sure it wasn't fractured after that nasty bike crash.

  45. This is off-topic but.. by mpeg4codec · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Has anyone played around with their little Java orbit simulator? It seems to me that in 2022 or so, the comet will come to a very near miss or possibly even impact with Mars. How reliable is this simulator in the long run, and how likely is it that something of that nature would occur and/or have any major effects?

    1. Re:This is off-topic but.. by imemyself · · Score: 1

      It comes fairly close according to the orbit sim(here), but the comet's orbit is a fair ways off the ecliptic. Where it would "intersect" Mar's orbit then, it would be over Mars. By the time it gets to Mar's orbit it would have already pulled ahead of Mars.

      --
      Every time you post an article on Slashdot, I kill a server. Think of the servers!
    2. Re:This is off-topic but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sep 6 2170 is about as close as it looks like it'll get ...

    3. Re:This is off-topic but.. by dabigpaybackski · · Score: 1

      Cool. Let's divert it's orbit a little then. Mars needs water if we want to start terraforming.

      --
      "OH SHIT, THERE'S A HORSE IN THE HOSPITAL!"
  46. Hollywood psychics? by vandoravp · · Score: 1

    First Arnold ends up with a possibility for being president (not likely I hope) and now this. Does Hollywood have a real-live psychic helping with storylines or is it the other way around and this culture is that influenced by movies? (note: terrible attempt at sarcasm)

  47. The deductive reasoning IQ of slashdot by ThoreauHD · · Score: 0, Troll

    42.

    I see lots of posts of the IQ deficient saying that this project is a waste of money. Tell me, when NASA has no money, why would they "waste" it by smashing copper into a near orbiting asteroid?

    Answer this you fucking myopic retards and you've gotten your answer.

    Align this with the fact that the US, EU, and Australia began building asteroid intercept craft's in 1999. You kids really have short memories and attention span's.

    You will notice a correlation here that we are about to get smacked and that this information is being withheld so you fuckers can continue to do what you are told. Squeel little piggies.

  48. Thanks NASA by Tom7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm glad we're finally doing something about these damned comets.

    Kill 'em all!

  49. Re:Nothing to see here. Please move along. by secretsquirel · · Score: 1

    Mayday Mayday! this is slashball 1, we've been hit hit! with rasberry's!!

  50. Two Points... by rasafras · · Score: 1

    First, they must have taken a page from the particle physics book: smash things together and see what happens.

    Second, we already know they're good at crashing things, so this shouldn't be a problem. In all seriousness, I look forward to it.

  51. Still no cure for cancer... by dan2cool2486 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Cant cure cancer. Cant cure AIDs either. Cant kill terrorists. But hell, lets blow up some comets!

    1. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "Cant cure cancer. Cant cure AIDs either. Cant kill terrorists. But hell, lets blow up some comets!"

      Yeah, it's pretty sad that Nasa's focus is on space travel instead of being a bunch of generalists.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      But what if these cures are in a comet?

    3. Re:Still no cure for cancer... by Drantin · · Score: 1

      Why, blow it up, of course!

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
  52. Re:Crew Suggestions - Michael Jackson & Fritz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hell, no. Cris Tucker would talk the thing into a million pieces and send them raining upon our solar system.

  53. Bunch of freaking nerds by barslecht · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I will not try and discourage you all from being second-hand dogprotoge's, but henceforth I got to tell you irrelevant assracking binoculars that there's more in no mam's life than cracked-eyed donuts and your forensic so-called stuff that matters.

    I won't try to immunate your moralistic unconciousness with irrelevant remarks like deo volente or carpe diem, but you should at least try to once see freaking more than this squared-ass blasphemy of what you are trying to achieve! Get out of your junked-boned plutoniumheap in Mary-freaking-Poppins-Ass-his-name to once see more than the indulgent pixel on your screen and the womb your social retireness was once created. Does this life of yours furfill a usefull purpose? Get on your legs, assraiders. Check barslecht.nl

  54. This one time... by Muttonhead · · Score: 2, Funny

    at band camp, we converted my flute into a rocket. We had a launch and it intercepted an asteroid. We steered the asteroid into a collision path with the earth. It was all very politically motivated of course. You see we wanted to bring in the new world order with a bang.

  55. NASA High by SmoothDime · · Score: 1

    Seems like NASA's been having a lot of success lately. These are exciting times and im glad to be alive. Let's go to mars!

  56. "Ah, one..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "...ah two-hoo, ah three."
    (Crunch).

    "Three."

    QED.

    1. Re:"Ah, one..." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Without biting it takes about 300 licks.

      I tested this when I was a kid.

  57. Solar pool... by Eric+Damron · · Score: 1

    And Earth is the left side pocket...

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  58. remember? by Striker770S · · Score: 2, Insightful

    NASA's Deep Impact, a spacecraft named after the 1998 movie why would anybody want to remember that movie let alone name something after it. The only reason it was made was because celestial objects destroying the planet was in that year. I mean remember that one fad where volcanoes destroying stuff was in. But i dont think NASA would be that connected into hollywood-movie-pop-fopa to name something after a movie because movies are so fake. I mean hell no one would name a fusion generator the octavious because a guy in spiderman2 created the most bullshit fusion reaction ever. Just my feeling.

    --
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. - Catcher in the Rye
    1. Re:remember? by Limburgher · · Score: 2, Funny

      fopa? Try faux pas. Funny. That's sort of like fumbling over the pronunciation of "pronunciation". :)

      --

      You are not the customer.

  59. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except for the fact that they aren't blowing up the comet.

  60. Re:Un-Funny Military Applications: China and NASA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    sorry, the yanks are the ones that are trying to militarize space. the whole "fortress america" thing is an act. how would a space based missle defence system stop any of the attacks that the united states has EVER experienced? it wont, and it couldnt. the whole thing is an excuse to put weapons in space to rain death on brown people all over the world.

  61. Waste by defrabelizer · · Score: 0, Troll

    what a waste of a perfectly good spaceship, and several million dollars.

  62. But what if the aliens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    design a comet buster buster? What then?

  63. As a bonus.... by Chmcginn · · Score: 1

    that impact may well be deep, and lasting. ;)

    --
    Have you been touched by his noodly appendage?
  64. i like to call it by Striker770S · · Score: 1

    creative spelling. i didnt feel like looking it up so i winged it. i do the same on homework.

    --
    I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes. - Catcher in the Rye
    1. Re:i like to call it by Qrlx · · Score: 1

      Just so you know, faux pas actually means something, and that something is, literally, "false step."

      I don't know if I would have gotten faux pas from what you wrote. That is all.

  65. Look by StikyPad · · Score: 1

    The NASA project was NOT named after the movie of the same name.

    It was named after Armageddon.

  66. Comet Temple 1 and 3 questions. by tdhillman · · Score: 0

    1. How come we always try to do the most far-fetched shit humanly possible. It's a ball of ice people.

    2. Is this a velied anti-semetic attack? (take some time with it....now you've got it)

    3. Didn't Mercury stop making Comets? This has got to be too valuable to blow a crater in.

    --
    befuddled (noun) 1. Unable to create a pithy sig
  67. Re:Un-Funny Military Applications: China and NASA by the+angry+liberal · · Score: 1

    Wow, you actually figured it out? We, the yanks, have known exactly what the point of this was for years.

    China is also seeking to militarize space. This would happen with or without the US being around. If the US or China wasn't there to do it, the old Soviet Union would have been happy to fill in the void. I am sure every one of the countries under the label of "axis of evil" would spring at the opportunity to also seek space weaponry if they had the resources. I would also bet a little dictator with death rays from space would have no problem obliterating your skinny, white european hyde. The US, on the other hand, would probably seek free trade agreements and offer humanitarian and military aid if you choose sides with them.

    While I disagree with the premise of the current occupation, it is disturbing to see so many people whine about a nation which brought them the very technology they use to complain about it.

    Hopefully, next time we won't spend hundreds of billions rebuilding europe, japan and company. Apparently, assisting them in their wars while being a constant source of aid doesn't give one any political tout anymore, so screw it. ;-)

  68. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Enjoy the attention whore.

  69. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    you mean "her" avatar is a girl? otherwise, i'm sorry, but you are off the island.

  70. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by qbwiz · · Score: 1

    Most of the ideas that I have heard for averting comets involve deflecting them, and not blowing them it.

    --
    Ewige Blumenkraft.
  71. Sounds like a good idea... by Sheepdot · · Score: 1

    ...but if the "Heaven's Gate" cult was right, we might be killing several aliens and the spirits of all the 39 dead humans who "warped" to the comet after committing suicide.

  72. American vs. European Approach by superyooser · · Score: 4, Funny
    ... the European Space Agency's Rosetta spacecraft, which will attempt a controlled landing on a comet, but not until 2014.

    Deep Impact, by contrast, will provide "instant gratification," says Grammier. The entire $330 million mission should be wrapped up a month after impact.

    So, the Europeans are going to geeeently land their little rover (Beagle III?), putter around, and delicately inspect rocks and dust. Boooriiiinng! :-)

    NASA, in typical American fashion...

    This is one spacecraft NASA wants to smash and trash. "It would be like it's standing in the middle of the road and this huge semi coming down at it at 23,000 mph (37,015 kph), you know, just bam!" Grammier says. ... "We expect to provide great fireworks for all our observatories," Grammier says, "and that's exciting to do it on July Fourth."
    KA-BLOOIEE! Blow it up! Blow it up! I'm so glad I'm an American. This is a country that combines science, space explosions, and patriotism into one very cool bundle. And we can take pictures of it from Mars.

    I. Love. This. Countryyy! Yeeeeeeaaah! *does Bush/Ballmer monkey dance*

    1. Re:American vs. European Approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sure but the ESA will never nkow anything below the surface they land on. Would you rather have nasa and esa both launch the same mission? Isn't variety better?

  73. Mea Culpa by superyooser · · Score: 1
    the Europeans are going to geeeently land their little rover (Beagle III?)

    Oh, it's called the Rosetta. Sorry. I even quoted that. Doh!
    But the Beagle jab was said in jest anyway.

  74. NASA = Nonthinking Arrogant Shooting Assholes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Everything in the universe has a purpose, a lot of which is still being discovered. Shooting a comet with out weighing out the possibilites, is lame. This one small comet may some where down the line hit a larger comet and prevent it from hitting us, who knows. They sure don't. It's a chain of events.

    1. Re:NASA = Nonthinking Arrogant Shooting Assholes. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And it's equally likely to hit a large comet and knock it towards earth! We better do something quick!

      That is to say, both are equally unlikely to ever happen, and I'll put money on the fact that we won't alter it's orbit measurably.

      What makes you think they didn't weigh out the posibilities?

      Personally, I'd rather learn what we can about comets so that we can do something about that big one that's coming eventually.

  75. I had a class with the Chief Scientist (A'Hearn) by dolphin558 · · Score: 0

    Michael A'Hearn is a very nice guy.

  76. Why bother? by srhuston · · Score: 1

    We already know what they'll find in the middle of the comet. Naquadah.

    --
    Three dits, four dits, two dits, dah!
    Radio, radio, rah rah rah!
  77. OH NOES! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if it hits to hard, it will set off the naquita that the go'aold hid in the center of the crater! get major carter up ther NOW!!!

  78. Geez - It should carry a mini iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    like, mini-CDs are soooo 90's.

  79. Re:From my super smart and beautiful girlfriend de by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There's also the fact that it's a known comet that any amature astronomer with a half decent telescope can track and calculate its orbit.

    Of course they could be lying about the target, but considering astronomers all around the world will be watching the target they told us, I don't think that's true. If there were a conspiracy why not just launch it without telling us the details.

  80. if this.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if this was in a cartoon, the copper pod would miss the comet, make a 180 turn around its gravity field and crash in bruce willi`s house

  81. 'nother small point here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It IS named after the movie. Well, because of it at least.

    I'll admit, you have the current "official statement" correct. None of the higher-ups want a project named after a hollywood movie. In the future this might well be the exact opposite, as advertising is the lifeblood of the space industry.

    I'd say you could get the facts by emailing one of the minor team members, but they really have better things to do, so lets just beleive what we will.