Slashdot Mirror


User: MichaelKristopeit501

MichaelKristopeit501's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
62
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 62

  1. Re:Why is this such a bad thing? on Apple To Require Sandboxing For Mac App Store Apps · · Score: -1
    you have strongly implied you're a pessimistic idiot.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen non-substantial based pseudonym, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  2. Re:Why is this such a bad thing? on Apple To Require Sandboxing For Mac App Store Apps · · Score: -1
    no one said it was "bad" or "so bad" other than you...

    you may as well have asked "why, at a technical level, is this so great?"

    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

  3. evidence of something covert is contradictory on China's Cyber-Warfare Capabilities Overstated · · Score: -1
    if such evidence existed, then the actions were not truly covert.

    truisms are true.

    slashdot = stagnated.

  4. Re:curious.. on US Government Seizes Email of WikiLeaks Volunteer · · Score: -1
    again... you're an ignorant hypocrite. no one is interested in ur mum's face. you posted comments in a public forum. you solicited a response from anyone and everyone. you're an idiot.

    your ignorant hypocrisy is what keeps you from understanding your hypocrisy... you'll never understand, again, because you're an idiot.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen non-standard based pseudonym, feeb.

    make another list. number it.

    you're completely pathetic.

  5. Re:curious.. on US Government Seizes Email of WikiLeaks Volunteer · · Score: -1
    said idiot is an idiot.

    ur mum's face are an ignorant fool

    even the constitution has been amended. even the amendments to the constitution have been revoked.

    does your law permit the application of martial law under any circumstance?

    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your non-standard based pseudonym while claiming to speak on behalf of others, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  6. Re:Sorry, I don't see the issue. on Judge Rules Boss's "Firing Contest" Created a Hostile Work Environment · · Score: -1, Flamebait
    who is "We"?

    you are exactly what you've claimed to be: NOTHING.

  7. Re:No censorship on youtube on Yahoo Blocked Emails About Wall Street Protests · · Score: -1
    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your artificial persona.

    you're completely pathetic.

  8. ST:TNG prior art on Encoding Messages In Bacteria · · Score: -1
    i just invented linking

    slashdot = stagnated

  9. Re:No censorship on youtube on Yahoo Blocked Emails About Wall Street Protests · · Score: -1
    i had nothing to do with that post... you wrote it.

    you're an idiot.

  10. Re:nobody cares on Another Unreleased iPhone Lost by Employee In a Bar · · Score: -1
    i appreciate the MatLab nod.

    you could have been less pathetic if you had just not cowered behind a chosen charged amphibien based pseudonym, feeb.

  11. Re:You know, I think I speak for many people when. on Alloy Could Produce Hydrogen Fuel Using Sunlight · · Score: -1
    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    why do you cower behind a chosen electronic based pseudonym, feeb?

    you're completely pathetic.

  12. Re:Pointing at someone else's problems... on Facebook's New Privacy Controls: Still Broken · · Score: -1
    you can't "also" do anything, as your original suggestion was ignorantly flawed. you have done nothing valid.

    relying on a 3rd party which allows public access, and taking personal responsibility for your own actions on your own property have absolutely nothing in common.

    you're an idiot.

  13. Re:Pointing at someone else's problems... on Facebook's New Privacy Controls: Still Broken · · Score: -1
    you obviously don't see how it's broken... a picture put on on the street can certainly be seen by the person whose name was put on it.

    you're an idiot.

  14. Re:Not cybercrime on Coordinated, Global ATM Heist Nets $13 Million · · Score: -1
    does it even matter if they read the article? they contradicted themselves in their own comments by claiming an electronic device interfaced with the bank network was required, but then somehow rejected that as use of an "android" based on relativistic cost.

    slashdot = stagnated.

  15. Re:justin bieber is a scientist? on Scientists Modify Organism With Artificial Amino Acid · · Score: -1
    on ur mum's face's heels.

    cower in my shadow some more behind your chosen greed for currency based pseudonym, feeb.

    you're completely pathetic.

  16. justin bieber is a scientist? on Scientists Modify Organism With Artificial Amino Acid · · Score: -1

    slashdot = stagnated

  17. Re:Good. on Gizmodo Off the Hook In iPhone 4 Investigation · · Score: -1
    what other purpose does a legal system serve than protecting?

    Funny thing, you're an idiot.

  18. wahh hh wah hh h wah h h h hh hhh h hh hh on Google Pulls Plug On Programming For the Masses · · Score: -1

    wa hh hhh hh wah hhh hh hh

  19. Re:OT: Google: Android's Archiles heal? on Google+ Registers 25 Million Visitors · · Score: -1
    you believe denis-The-menace to be panicking? you are very naive.

    get back to work at the apple store, denis, you're completely pathetic.

  20. Re:So...google apps folks? on Google+ Registers 25 Million Visitors · · Score: -1

    i'm sure it also seemed to work just fine for the cross site scripters who wanted to see how you arrange and classify your acquaintances and then rebroadcast that information to anyone else who was curious.

  21. richard stallman is an ignorant hypocrite on Emacs Has Been Violating the GPL Since 2009 · · Score: -1

    completely pathetic.

  22. Re:Good call on Court to Decide If Man Can Keep His Moon Rock · · Score: -1
    there is a legal concept of "abandonment"... it is called "abandonment"

    you're an "idiot". you're also an "ignorant hypocrite".

    you sign all of your comments with the demand of others to "Learn to love Alaska".

    why would you randomly demand of others to "Learn to love alaska" unless you believed others to not already love alaska?

    every time you make such demands you are proclaiming a current state of a lack of alaskan love. you seemingly claim it is because reason to love has not yet been learned. i claim it might be for other reasons.

    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    alaska is the worst.

  23. Re:Good call on Court to Decide If Man Can Keep His Moon Rock · · Score: -1
    you are an ignorant hypocrite.
    a determination of abandonment leads to a later assignment of ownership process, thus, you're an idiot.

    you don't agree that you're an idiot, because you're an ignorant hypocrite... there is a legal concept of "abandonment"... that is why "abandonment" is a legal concept. you're a moron. you fail to understand that you're a moron because you're an idiot who is an ignorant hypocrite.

    you sign all of your comments with the demand of others to "Learn to love Alaska".

    why would you randomly demand of others to "Learn to love alaska" unless you believed others to not already love alaska?

    every time you make such demands you are proclaiming a current state of a lack of alaskan love. you seemingly claim it is because reason to love has not yet been learned. i claim it might be for other reasons.

    you're an ignorant hypocrite.

    alaska is the worst.

  24. Re:Garbage in, Garbage out on JPMorgan Rolls Out FPGA Supercomputer · · Score: -1

    and the PR is basically an admission that their system architects are unable to build a report cache system that continuously regenerates.

  25. Re:Good call on Court to Decide If Man Can Keep His Moon Rock · · Score: -1
    so "abandoned" is a legal sense? but, wouldn't that mean there is a legal definition for rescinding ownership? didn't you claim that such a definition didn't exist? i didn't go to alaskan public school, but that seems to be a... "contradiction"... or "display of ignorant hypocrisy"... or a "lie". "you're an idiot". "double quoted".

    so, "temporarily" someone doesn't own something, and you think that proves that nothing can ever not be owned by anyone? "again" you're an "idiot". let me guess, you're not a fan of native americans?

    you're an ignorant hypocrite, in a legal sense.

    alaska is the worst.