I have never had a white person come up to me and threat me for doing nothing. But, I have had multiple black, ghetto rat thugs do it. The article's author was fired for pointing out how he feels most white people have to think and deal with most black people because "the internet" took offense to it. It didn't matter that his article was in response to an article written by a black man about how black parent feel they must teach their children to deal with white people, especial authority figures.
So, why don't you answer as to why black people think it is appropriate to shout insults at a stranger who has done nothing to them then track that person down and threaten him with violence and death in a grocery store?
I have never had a white person come up to me and threat me for doing nothing. But, I have had multiple black, ghetto rat thugs do it.
It is not just my "anecdote". Maybe you should check out the crime statistics and the prison populations and the gangs. Oh, wait, reality doesn't for a basis for your world view does it? Let me guess, all those violent, drug dealing, gang members who are black are just misunderstood and held down by the man, right? Let me guess, all those black men in prison are there unjustly, right? They never committed a crime, they were framed by whitey, right? And, the simple fact that one of the leading causes of death among black males is other black males is just a coincidence.
Here is the truth: Most black people in America are violent, arrogant, ignorant, racist assholes who are barely civilized and it is their own fault. Their culture glorifies anti-intellectualism, racism, violence, hatred, drugs, and murder. Most black children are born to single mothers who often have multiple children from different fathers who do not support their children. All the while claiming they are christians. They complain they can't get a good job while ignoring the fact that they are ignorant because they didn't want to pay attention in school. Of course, they preferred to disrupt classes in school because they weren't going to need it because they are all going to be professional athletes or rappers making millions a year. They come to interviews dressed like trash, speak like trash, give the interview attitude then claim racism when the aren't hired. Rather than work to improve themselves, they abuse drugs. Rather than work at the low paying jobs they qualify for, thanks to their anti-intellectualism, they commit crimes and deal drugs. They demand respect while giving none. They demand to be treated as social equals while dressing and acting like savages. And, the times the black culture has been challenged by black people, those people, including Bill Cosby, have been derided as race traitors by the race-baiting "black leaders".
And, the absolute worst part is how kids of all races see that misbegotten excuse for a culture as cool and want to emulate it because it is different from their authority figures' cultures.
He doesn't say what to do in the situation I found myself in, with a large black man accosting me and trying to start an altercation in a grocery store when I had done nothing at all. I was left wishing I had purchased the handgun I was looking at a few days earlier because this individual was stating that I would have been physically attacked and possibly killed if I had not been inside the store.
And, black people wonder why they have bad reputations, are feared, and get shot.
So, you are saying that killing someone to save others is less evil than killing someone just because. Killing another person, even in defense of another, is evil according to many people. Just ask the people who protest against the death penalty.
Thus, my argument still holds.
I am not twisting your words, rather I am reframing your statement by extending it to similar acts and situation. Your point was that "avoiding the greater evil does not legitimize the lesser evil".It is just less evil than letting that other person kill someone else.
Stip searching prisoners is, according to you, the lesser evil. The possible violent attack with a weapon and/or death of a guard or inmate is the greater evil.
You are making a fool of yourself by making foolish arguments that require a variation of the special pleading fallacy.
Your second mistake may have been to accept the free hosting. It is quite possible that by accepting you have just cut yourself out of any future ability to seek redress.
Oh, so murdering someone isn't evil all the time, yes?
The reason for the strip search is to prevent weapons and other dangerous object from entering and being manufactured and then used in the prison or jail. The strip search is to protect the lives of the inmates from other inmates.
Seeing as it is OK to kill someone to protect a life, why isn't it OK to strip search someone to protect multiple lives?
Why can't you get the story straight? Your description is as accurate as describing the sinking of the Titanic as "Ship hits ice cube causing some injuries".
4) An innocent man who, thanks to the media and people on social networking sites, will be branded a murderer and, with the rest of his family, live in fear for the rest of his life.
Martin, a stranger to the neighborhood, wandering around the neighborhood in the middle of the night in the rain wearing a "hoodie" instead of rain gear or carrying an umbrella is suspicious behavior. Clearly, Martin engaging in this suspicious behavior is what started this chain of events.
Really? So, murdering a dictator to prevent the deaths of hundreds of his subjects is not legitimate? Shooting and killing an armed hostage taker is not legitimate?
No, the cops arrested him because he had a bench warrant for contempt of court because he didn't show up in court and someone didn't record that he had paid his fine.
When one is put in jail, one doesn't have certain rights. Or, do you think that when one is locked up, one retains all of one's rights, such as the right to bear arms?
I am afraid YOU didn't educate yourself about the actual case. When one does not paying a traffic ticket, one is required to appear in court. Failing to appear in court about that traffic ticket is considered being in contempt of court. When one is in contempt of court, a warrant is issued for one's arrest. He was arrested because a warrant was issued because he was in contempt of court.
The officer did not have a choice in the matter. If he had let the guy go, he would have been derelict in his duty. The officer is not the judge and only the judge can accept the documentation and vacate the warrant. You are suggesting that the officer go beyond his powers and substitute his own opinion over that of the judge. And, even if the officer had let the guy go, if another officer at some point in the future were to cross paths with the guy in question, the guy would have been arrested because the officer does not have the power to dismiss the warrant.
Also, the officer did not have the person arrested. The judge had the officer arrest the person.
What are you, 12? Don't you know anything about the law? Perhaps you should try learning about the law before commenting on it.
Slashdot Mirror
I have never had a white person come up to me and threat me for doing nothing. But, I have had multiple black, ghetto rat thugs do it. The article's author was fired for pointing out how he feels most white people have to think and deal with most black people because "the internet" took offense to it. It didn't matter that his article was in response to an article written by a black man about how black parent feel they must teach their children to deal with white people, especial authority figures.
So, why don't you answer as to why black people think it is appropriate to shout insults at a stranger who has done nothing to them then track that person down and threaten him with violence and death in a grocery store?
I have never had a white person come up to me and threat me for doing nothing. But, I have had multiple black, ghetto rat thugs do it.
It is not just my "anecdote". Maybe you should check out the crime statistics and the prison populations and the gangs. Oh, wait, reality doesn't for a basis for your world view does it? Let me guess, all those violent, drug dealing, gang members who are black are just misunderstood and held down by the man, right? Let me guess, all those black men in prison are there unjustly, right? They never committed a crime, they were framed by whitey, right? And, the simple fact that one of the leading causes of death among black males is other black males is just a coincidence.
Here is the truth: Most black people in America are violent, arrogant, ignorant, racist assholes who are barely civilized and it is their own fault. Their culture glorifies anti-intellectualism, racism, violence, hatred, drugs, and murder. Most black children are born to single mothers who often have multiple children from different fathers who do not support their children. All the while claiming they are christians. They complain they can't get a good job while ignoring the fact that they are ignorant because they didn't want to pay attention in school. Of course, they preferred to disrupt classes in school because they weren't going to need it because they are all going to be professional athletes or rappers making millions a year. They come to interviews dressed like trash, speak like trash, give the interview attitude then claim racism when the aren't hired. Rather than work to improve themselves, they abuse drugs. Rather than work at the low paying jobs they qualify for, thanks to their anti-intellectualism, they commit crimes and deal drugs. They demand respect while giving none. They demand to be treated as social equals while dressing and acting like savages. And, the times the black culture has been challenged by black people, those people, including Bill Cosby, have been derided as race traitors by the race-baiting "black leaders".
And, the absolute worst part is how kids of all races see that misbegotten excuse for a culture as cool and want to emulate it because it is different from their authority figures' cultures.
So, it is only intolerance if a white person does it?
He doesn't say what to do in the situation I found myself in, with a large black man accosting me and trying to start an altercation in a grocery store when I had done nothing at all. I was left wishing I had purchased the handgun I was looking at a few days earlier because this individual was stating that I would have been physically attacked and possibly killed if I had not been inside the store.
And, black people wonder why they have bad reputations, are feared, and get shot.
If it is so secret, how come the author of the article has all this information on it?
I am not putting words in your mouth. I am picking apart your argument by showing it is based on a false premise.
Everyone knows there are no viruses for Macs because it is based on a Unix kernel~
So, you are saying that killing someone to save others is less evil than killing someone just because. Killing another person, even in defense of another, is evil according to many people. Just ask the people who protest against the death penalty.
Thus, my argument still holds.
I am not twisting your words, rather I am reframing your statement by extending it to similar acts and situation.
Your point was that "avoiding the greater evil does not legitimize the lesser evil".It is just less evil than letting that other person kill someone else.
Stip searching prisoners is, according to you, the lesser evil. The possible violent attack with a weapon and/or death of a guard or inmate is the greater evil.
You are making a fool of yourself by making foolish arguments that require a variation of the special pleading fallacy.
Hey, look, another liar.
In actuality, it went like this:
4) Confronts random stranger, determines stranger is a dumbass kid.
5) Turns to return to his car.
6) Stranger sucker punches him.
7) Stranger gets on his chest and pounds his head into the sidewalk
8) He shoots the stranger trying to kill him.
Now, shut the fuck up if you can't get the story right.
Your second mistake may have been to accept the free hosting. It is quite possible that by accepting you have just cut yourself out of any future ability to seek redress.
I am sure you will keep your head buried in your ass and the asses of people like yourself.
Oh, so murdering someone isn't evil all the time, yes?
The reason for the strip search is to prevent weapons and other dangerous object from entering and being manufactured and then used in the prison or jail. The strip search is to protect the lives of the inmates from other inmates.
Seeing as it is OK to kill someone to protect a life, why isn't it OK to strip search someone to protect multiple lives?
Why can't you get the story straight? Your description is as accurate as describing the sinking of the Titanic as "Ship hits ice cube causing some injuries".
Yes, they purposefully distorted the call and they did it for ratings.
I see. So pandering to the lowest common denominator justifies a news program lying on air and fanning the flames of public outrage. Interesting.
Yes, you missed
4) An innocent man who, thanks to the media and people on social networking sites, will be branded a murderer and, with the rest of his family, live in fear for the rest of his life.
Zimmerman grabbed his gun, jumped out of his car, and chased down a random stranger who was just walking down the street.
Nice way to lie.
Martin, a stranger to the neighborhood, wandering around the neighborhood in the middle of the night in the rain wearing a "hoodie" instead of rain gear or carrying an umbrella is suspicious behavior. Clearly, Martin engaging in this suspicious behavior is what started this chain of events.
No, dumbass, the bench warrant was issued for contempt of court. Do you know anything about the law or are you just talking out of your ass?
Really? So, murdering a dictator to prevent the deaths of hundreds of his subjects is not legitimate? Shooting and killing an armed hostage taker is not legitimate?
Your point is false.
Ever hear the terms misleading vividness and cherry-picking?
No, the cops arrested him because he had a bench warrant for contempt of court because he didn't show up in court and someone didn't record that he had paid his fine.
total gutting of our rights
When one is put in jail, one doesn't have certain rights. Or, do you think that when one is locked up, one retains all of one's rights, such as the right to bear arms?
Please explain, in detail, how it is "essential liberty" to not be strip searched before being put in the general population of the jail.
I am afraid YOU didn't educate yourself about the actual case. When one does not paying a traffic ticket, one is required to appear in court. Failing to appear in court about that traffic ticket is considered being in contempt of court. When one is in contempt of court, a warrant is issued for one's arrest. He was arrested because a warrant was issued because he was in contempt of court.
The officer did not have a choice in the matter. If he had let the guy go, he would have been derelict in his duty. The officer is not the judge and only the judge can accept the documentation and vacate the warrant. You are suggesting that the officer go beyond his powers and substitute his own opinion over that of the judge. And, even if the officer had let the guy go, if another officer at some point in the future were to cross paths with the guy in question, the guy would have been arrested because the officer does not have the power to dismiss the warrant.
Also, the officer did not have the person arrested. The judge had the officer arrest the person.
What are you, 12? Don't you know anything about the law? Perhaps you should try learning about the law before commenting on it.