No. He was arrested because he had a bench warrant for his arrest. He didn't commit a minor traffic infraction and was arrested by an officer who pulled him over. That is like saying a man was arrested for speeding when in the whole story is he beat his wife, she filed a complaint, a warrant for his arrest was issued, and was arrested when he was pulled over for speeding.
In an ideal world, there would be no crime, everyone would have enough to eat, no one would have to do a job they dislike, and a man could have sex with a hot chick whenever he felt like it.
No. This entire case is about people who have been arrested and taken to jail. Once in the jail, the police can strip search any detainee. So, you have to be arrested, taken to and held at the jail.
A valid arrest is an officer telling one not to leave. You should learn the actual meaning of "arrest". When people are taken to jail and only charged with "resisting arrest" or "resisting arrest without violence", what has happened is the officer told the person to stop or not leave or to come back because the officer wanted to talk to the person and the person has attempted to leave. Once an officer has, even verbally, restricted your freedom to leave one is under arrest. Attempting to leave is "resisting arrest".
Your personal definitions don't mean shit in the law or in court.
So the Supreme Court ruled that it is perfectly reasonable to arrest someone for absolutely no reason
An arrest warrant, even if it is a clerical error, is a valid reason to arrest someone and take them to jail. The person in question was arrested because there was a warrant for his arrest.
Imagine that your 19 year old daughter had gotten a speeding ticket, paid it a bit late, but paid it in full, and was carrying proof, was then forcibly taken into custody for a few days and required to spread her legs and hold open her vagina while an officer shined a flashlight inside while several others stood around, then repeat for her anus; and again before going to court where the judge orders her released on her own recognizance.
You use two fallacies, misleading vividness and cherry-picking.
And, that is not what happens in a strip search. An officer performs the search while observed by a second officer to ensure no sexual battery occurs. Male officers do not search female prisoners. Everyone who is arrested and taken to jail is searched. The person in question was not singled out for search, but was searched along with everyone else.
And, how about this scenario:
Imagine that your 19 year old daughter had gotten a speeding ticket, paid it a bit late, but paid it in full, and was carrying proof, was then forcibly taken into custody where she is sexually tortured and her throat is cut by a gang member who was arrested and had a straight razor hidden in her vagina.
See, two can play that game. And, I hope that happens to your kids and your grandkids. In fact, I hope your son gets arrested, taken to jail, and then gets his dick and balls cut off and fed to him when he resists the advances of a guy who got a knife or some other blade in by having it stashed in his ass.
And, Zimmerman and other witnesses said they were on at least partially on the sidewalk. Are you sure you want to allow that. I suggest you look up the rate of concussion from having one's head impact the ground, including grass. Why don't you have a friend do that to you and get back to me, assuming you are able?
I see you are privy to the entire investigation. Please tell us everything that has happened in it, including everything that has not been made public.
Here is what we will do. I will come up behind you and punch you in the face as you turn around. Then, while you are down, I am going to get on your chest and begin to pound the back of you head into the side walk. Then, you can explain to me if it was self-defense or not.
I wasn't writing about how much, but I gave some evidence (not definitive, but some) that this wasn't true
I suggest you look up the phrase "Daming with faint praise". If they didn't hate to pay money, there would be much more, and you completely ignore that. The fact is that if they didn't hate to pay, they would be paying much more and Nepomuk would have pulled in much more. Instead, you have proven my point for me.
Seriously, just stop. The FLOSS community hates to pay money and thinks no one should make any money from software. All one has to do is look at comments on Slashdot to see that.
It is called insanity. And, to be honest, stupidity. The true secret to success is not "never give up". Rather, it is "Know when and why to give up and try something else."
So, you are saying that it is Microsoft's job to choose third party software for you and host it, right? You are complaining that Microsoft doesn't provide a bunch of software they didn't write and don't care about but Ubuntu does? You do know that SSH is not a part of Linux, right? Nor is there spreadsheet software or PDF reader that is a part of Linux. Those are third-party software application bundled into a distribution and the bundled apps vary between distribution. You know that right? And, you know that Linux is not Ubuntu right? And, that Linux is not the GNU tool set?
Seriously, if you want to play this game, we can and you will lose.
You know who does the equivalent of making Windows distros? Computer and Laptop manufacturers such as Asus, Dell, and HP. And, what does everyone complain about? "That crapware installed on my new laptop that I have to uninstall."
Slashdot Mirror
No, they didn't. You obviously have no clue about the law and how it varies. Now, please, STFU.
No. He was arrested because he had a bench warrant for his arrest. He didn't commit a minor traffic infraction and was arrested by an officer who pulled him over. That is like saying a man was arrested for speeding when in the whole story is he beat his wife, she filed a complaint, a warrant for his arrest was issued, and was arrested when he was pulled over for speeding.
He would have been arrested and god knows what else.
False assumption.
And, I call bullshit on you being a lawyer, thus I call bullshit on your story.
Do it. I will love to see the look on your face when you are then taken to jail and charged with indecent exposure or some equivalent charge.
In an ideal world, there would be no crime, everyone would have enough to eat, no one would have to do a job they dislike, and a man could have sex with a hot chick whenever he felt like it.
Oh, yes, YouTube. The last bastion of fair and balanced reporting in America. Let me guess, you also believe the flat-earthers on there too, right?
Please go look up the legal definition of "arrest".
No. This entire case is about people who have been arrested and taken to jail. Once in the jail, the police can strip search any detainee. So, you have to be arrested, taken to and held at the jail.
A valid arrest is an officer telling one not to leave. You should learn the actual meaning of "arrest". When people are taken to jail and only charged with "resisting arrest" or "resisting arrest without violence", what has happened is the officer told the person to stop or not leave or to come back because the officer wanted to talk to the person and the person has attempted to leave. Once an officer has, even verbally, restricted your freedom to leave one is under arrest. Attempting to leave is "resisting arrest".
Your personal definitions don't mean shit in the law or in court.
So the Supreme Court ruled that it is perfectly reasonable to arrest someone for absolutely no reason
An arrest warrant, even if it is a clerical error, is a valid reason to arrest someone and take them to jail. The person in question was arrested because there was a warrant for his arrest.
Imagine that your 19 year old daughter had gotten a speeding ticket, paid it a bit late, but paid it in full, and was carrying proof, was then forcibly taken into custody for a few days and required to spread her legs and hold open her vagina while an officer shined a flashlight inside while several others stood around, then repeat for her anus; and again before going to court where the judge orders her released on her own recognizance.
You use two fallacies, misleading vividness and cherry-picking.
And, that is not what happens in a strip search. An officer performs the search while observed by a second officer to ensure no sexual battery occurs. Male officers do not search female prisoners. Everyone who is arrested and taken to jail is searched. The person in question was not singled out for search, but was searched along with everyone else.
And, how about this scenario:
Imagine that your 19 year old daughter had gotten a speeding ticket, paid it a bit late, but paid it in full, and was carrying proof, was then forcibly taken into custody where she is sexually tortured and her throat is cut by a gang member who was arrested and had a straight razor hidden in her vagina.
See, two can play that game. And, I hope that happens to your kids and your grandkids. In fact, I hope your son gets arrested, taken to jail, and then gets his dick and balls cut off and fed to him when he resists the advances of a guy who got a knife or some other blade in by having it stashed in his ass.
Oh, and here you go: video evidence of an injury to the back of Zimmerman's head.
And, Zimmerman and other witnesses said they were on at least partially on the sidewalk. Are you sure you want to allow that. I suggest you look up the rate of concussion from having one's head impact the ground, including grass. Why don't you have a friend do that to you and get back to me, assuming you are able?
I see you are privy to the entire investigation. Please tell us everything that has happened in it, including everything that has not been made public.
Of course, if you can't, then you are lying.
Here is what we will do. I will come up behind you and punch you in the face as you turn around. Then, while you are down, I am going to get on your chest and begin to pound the back of you head into the side walk. Then, you can explain to me if it was self-defense or not.
You wouldn't believe his claims because you are a bigot.
Seeing as almost every single news source in the U.K. is baised, there is not such things as a "quality newspaper" in the U.K.
You mean a biased, lying, window-peeping rag?
As long as you don't mind massive habitat destruction. All the environmentalists will be fine with that, right?
Piracy never hurts anyone! I know it has to be true because that is what I keep seeing people say here on Slashdot!
I guess FLOSS supporters don't like hearing the truth.
I wasn't writing about how much, but I gave some evidence (not definitive, but some) that this wasn't true
I suggest you look up the phrase "Daming with faint praise". If they didn't hate to pay money, there would be much more, and you completely ignore that. The fact is that if they didn't hate to pay, they would be paying much more and Nepomuk would have pulled in much more. Instead, you have proven my point for me.
Seriously, just stop. The FLOSS community hates to pay money and thinks no one should make any money from software. All one has to do is look at comments on Slashdot to see that.
It is called insanity. And, to be honest, stupidity. The true secret to success is not "never give up". Rather, it is "Know when and why to give up and try something else."
And, SSH isn't a part of Linux or even GNU/Linux. It is included by Ubuntu as third-party software.
So, you are saying that it is Microsoft's job to choose third party software for you and host it, right? You are complaining that Microsoft doesn't provide a bunch of software they didn't write and don't care about but Ubuntu does? You do know that SSH is not a part of Linux, right? Nor is there spreadsheet software or PDF reader that is a part of Linux. Those are third-party software application bundled into a distribution and the bundled apps vary between distribution. You know that right? And, you know that Linux is not Ubuntu right? And, that Linux is not the GNU tool set?
Seriously, if you want to play this game, we can and you will lose.
You know who does the equivalent of making Windows distros? Computer and Laptop manufacturers such as Asus, Dell, and HP. And, what does everyone complain about? "That crapware installed on my new laptop that I have to uninstall."