Slashdot Mirror


User: driftingwalrus

driftingwalrus's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
333
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 333

  1. A classic gopher site... on Bring Back Gopher Campaign · · Score: 1
    The net just wouldn't be the net without the Internet Wiretap...

    gopher://wiretap.spies.com

  2. Re:ok.... on Democratic GPL Software Company · · Score: 1

    And the strong "Gatesian" hand you speak of gave us Megacruft Windows. Yet, development driven by geeks who wanted to put in "k00l" features gave us Linux. I think that speaks for itself.

  3. Re:No contract? on Intellectual Property Issues In College? · · Score: 1


    Contracts assigning ownership over ideas that one comes up with even in one's own personal time over to a company are nothing new -- Waelscherts was under a contract like that when he came up with his valve gear design. To escape having to sign the idea over to the railway he worked for, he had a friend patent the idea in the US for him and then signed the patents over to him when left the railway.

  4. Re:Proven? on Dinosaurs Never Held Heads High · · Score: 1

    IMHO, I think you can actually prove quite a lot in mathematics.

  5. Re:Woe to my kid who tries this on his school... on The Kid Who Wouldn't Be King (UPDATED) · · Score: 1

    Seems to call to mind the Freedom Riders in the US(if memory serves).

    All they did was write letters, right?

  6. Re:Vote !Gore on The Full Nader Plus a Taste of Bush and Gore · · Score: 1

    Hum! I wonder if you propel a vehicle using a vote/anti-vote reaction...

    If an anti-vote hits a vote, do they both cancel each other out releasing massive amounts of politicians?

  7. Reminds me of a classic patent... on Patent Warfare · · Score: 1

    About 1910 Henry Ford had a lot of problem from a consortium of car makers.

    They had a patent on the arrangement of an engine, wheels and transmission. It was excessively broad, and the idea was nothing new.

    It took years and a massive legal battle to finally kill that patent.

  8. New name for this planet on New 'Planet' Discovered in Solar System · · Score: 1

    It should be named 'Rupert'.

  9. Re:This sucks on Mir Lives · · Score: 1

    There's a lot of value to keeping Mir running at this stage.

    The more disasters encountered on Mir the more experience you have dealing with them. Mir's had fires, explosions, air leaks, crashes, failures galore. What that means is that now they know how to deal with those disasters in a real world situation.

    Because of Mir the Russians have been able to gain a great of expertise on dealing with space-borne disasters. Who's to say that any one of the disasters Mir has encountered couldn't happen on the ISS? Every single one could very easily happen. The people who designed Mir should be extremely proud of themselves, they've managed to build a space station that has survived more than twice is expected lifetime and it still supporting life.

  10. Re:Employee Mail on UK Employers May Read Employees' Mail · · Score: 1

    > so is the toilet.. how'd you like a camera there?

    Interestingly, what if a certain disgruntled employee where deliberately clogging said toilet? Or lobbing explosive charges down the thing? Would it be justifyed to mount cameras in the washroom so as to identify said employee?

  11. Re:The domain squatter daemon [concept] on NSI Accused of Cybersquatting · · Score: 1

    Here, here! We need something more interesting to consume CPU cycles than cracking RC5.

  12. Re:Don't dismiss watermarking too fast... :-( on SDMI *NOT* Cracked!? · · Score: 1

    They have an awful lot more to be afraid of than we do.

    No matter what, inevitably, they're going to be fighting people who are a lot smarter than they are. I have no doubt that no matter the technology they come up with a way to crack it.

    It's always a stupid idea to fight people that are smarter than you are.

  13. Re:Fully Operational? on Lego Mindstorms AT-AT · · Score: 1

    >I dont give a flying fuck about online music, I >dont give a flying fuck about politics, the >cuecat,
    > freshmeat, anime, starwars or lego. >This site blows harder than it ever has.
    >

    Then why do you ever read it? You silly, silly person.

    That's like buying a game magazine and complaining about their being so much #$%#$% coverage of games.

  14. Re:Union! on Aristotle, Dilbert And The Working Life · · Score: 1

    A union is most necessary where a company tries to cheat it's workers and give them the minimum necessary. Lest we should forget working conditions at the turn of the last century - you could go to jail for quitting your job.

    Safety standards(and especially OSHA) where totally nonexistant, and employers provided no help. Get your hand ripped off in some machinery? Well, if you couldn't afford medial care, tough. The company sure wasn't going to sink any money into it. Unions forced employers to give employees fair treatment. How many large companies would *YOU* be willing to trust to give you fair treatment? There aren't a whole lot.

    Some places, of course, don't need a union. If you consider machine shops, they're mostly rather small businesses, and usually are not unionized. The owners of machine shops are also rarely jerks trying to cheat their employees.

    In the computer business, we DESERVE paid overtime. Seniority should be valued. Better work hours and better treatment. That's what unions can bring. Now, if the place where you work already provides those things, then you don't really need a union. Not many companies do, however. Those places need unions.

  15. Geek Porn on Welcome to the World of Quickies Entertainment · · Score: 1

    Hum! I was rather hoping it would be a Cray with it's cabinet open....

  16. Union! on Aristotle, Dilbert And The Working Life · · Score: 2

    I've said it before and I'll say it again, the IT field would be much better off with unionization.

  17. Re:This baby is actually several years late on Where Oh Where Is The Pentium 4? · · Score: 1

    I will take this time to note that are a number of non-Intel architectures out there already that are 64-bit.

  18. Re:This baby is actually several years late on Where Oh Where Is The Pentium 4? · · Score: 1

    Actually... no. In 2038 the clock rolls over, so the date suddenly changes from 2037 to 1969.

    A lot of software doesn't handle that change terribly well, though some can. The EOF is ^D, unfortunately I don't have an ASCII table handy to tell you what the hex for ^D is :( It's deffinitely not 9999.... etc.('twould be a 32-bit int, though, so 32 1's translated into decimal)

  19. Re:Is this even legal? on Aussies Put Old Pay-TV Dishes To Use -- As A LAN · · Score: 3

    To my understanding, the limits are only on the outer edges of the band.

    2.4GHz is an ISM band(Industry, Science, Medical), so it gets used by microwaves, X-Ray machines, etc. It's not a licensed band, and is mostly kept open for noise generated by these devices.

  20. Hacker on Digital Convergence Likes Hackers (?) · · Score: 1

    At least they're using the term hacker properly....

  21. Re:is Xi still spamming usenet? on DeXtop And Free Software · · Score: 1

    'Tis a pity, too.

    At least a while back their stuff used to be pretty good...

  22. Mass Download on Can Ten Billion Gigs Fit In A Test Tube? · · Score: 1

    Great! Now we can do a mass download of the whole world wide web and determine an official signal to noise ratio for this thing.

  23. Re:JW's not taking blood products is darwin in act on Blood Type: NULL · · Score: 1

    You make a fundamental assumption here, and that is that blood is safe. Blood is not safe, the list of diseases that can be transferred through it is PHENOMINAL!

    Neither is there a whole lot of proof that blood transfusions are actually beneficial.

    Also, have you ever actually read the Bible? From what you say, it certainly sounds like you haven't. If you haven't, shutup.

  24. MRAM == Core memory? on What Will Be The Next Generation Of RAM? · · Score: 1

    This MRAM sounds a LOT like old-fashioned core memory.

    It didn't lose the data it carried after powerdown, either.

  25. Re:But when? on Potential 100 GHz Carbon Nanotube Molecular Computer · · Score: 1

    > Sounds like a bunch of researchers are in need of > more funding to me, so they try to make promises > of something that probably will never happen.

    You have to realize that these technologies take a lot of time and effort to develop, things do come of them but you don't always hear reports that mention the original announcement. Consider the blue laser, I remember reading about the development of the blue laser in Scientific American back in 1994. Wasn't until much later that the technology finally saw it's full use in DVDs.