Slashdot Mirror


Aussies Put Old Pay-TV Dishes To Use -- As A LAN

Insane Hardware writes: "If you thought the olympic show the Aussie's put on was pretty tops, then this will blow your socks off. Insane Hardware sends in word about a group of people in the country's capital, Canberra (just south of Sydney), who are setting up a wireless air network for game play amoungst many other things (pr0n trading???). So how are these guys doing it and doing it cheaply? Well they are using satellite dishes from an old defunct Pay-TV system Australia had some years back called Galaxy, and are using some standard old full-length WaveLAN ISA cards which operate in the 2.4GHz range to hook up to these ol dishes. " (More below.)

Mr. Hardware continues: "Although not the best speeds, approximately 2Mbps with a 2.2ms round trip latency isn't too shabby when you consider the cost and implementation of this. Hell, you can even learn how to make a reciever dish at this site! So how is it powered? Linux of course! Check out www.air.net.au for more info."

Check out the mailing list archives to see how much progress they've made, too -- perhaps some friendly (and entrepreneurial) Slashdot reader can hook a few Canberrans up with wireless cards for cheaper than they can get them down there?

159 comments

  1. Re:Necessary to mention Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    Yer I saw that. The article is infact on Air.net.au. It has some excellent info on it. Im interested in trying something like this, however I am unsure about the FFC rules and regulations for 2.4GHz operation. Isn't that "free" man's territory?

  2. I don't think they're using the satellite by plover · · Score: 1
    I'm reading this as they're using the old dishes as high-gain antennas for their own point-to-point network.

    John

    --
    John
  3. Re:Fosters... by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

    How do you pronounce XXXX?

    --
    -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
  4. Re:Fosters... by snookums · · Score: 1

    four-ecks

    --
    Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
  5. Re:Fosters... by snookums · · Score: 1

    Considering that you can buy Melbourne Bitter in Victoria as well, I doubt that this is true. They might have started bringing it to Sydney to combat Tooheys "Sydney Bitter" (which was a nice beer, but they kept changing the recipe until it ended up tasting of sump-oil).

    --
    Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
  6. Re:Fosters... by snookums · · Score: 1

    If Canberra is too cold for you, go stand in front of one of these 2.4GHz dishes :)

    --
    Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
  7. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by Erasmus · · Score: 1

    Actually, it looks like they are just using the antennas from the defunct TV service, not the satelites.

    In fact, if you read their site, they are using home-made and other types of antennas as well.

  8. Why bother with wireless?? by James+Foster · · Score: 1

    I live in Sydney, and on the way back from a recent skiing trip we passed through Canberra. It takes all of 5 mins to drive from one end to the other. Canberra is like a country town, and since the project is specified at "North Canberra" I'm wondering why they didn't use normal cables ;) I can see why /. called it a "LAN" rather than "WAN" though...

    1. Re:Why bother with wireless?? by NtG · · Score: 1

      PS for those who haven't visited us here, Canberra is not that small. And while this project is based in North Canberra, there are people attempting to achieve the same thing in South Canberra. It would be difficult to link the two networks wirelessly as there is a fair distance between the sites at North and South Canberra.

    2. Re:Why bother with wireless?? by tyderian · · Score: 1

      Canberra is not a 5 minute town... Takes more than 40 minutes to drive from one end to the other legally... and thats on a fairly clean run.... North canberra is fairly large, sure not as big as sydney, but its got roughly half of the 350,000 odd population there... Its mainly northside because its *run* by people in the Clug (canberra linux users group) which coincidentally meets northside (Aus.Nat.Uni)

      --
      A goldfish has a memory span of about 3 seconds. Im not much better.
  9. Re:Fosters... by lpontiac · · Score: 1
    Really? I never knew that... guess that explains it all.

    Still, I can't quite see myself drinking Crownies out of a blue can..

  10. minnesota by austad · · Score: 1

    Who wants to try this in the Minneapolis/St. Paul area? I'm 23 stories up and have a good line of sight view to many places around St. Paul.

    austad@NO.SPAM.marketwatch.com

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  11. SeattleWireless by belial · · Score: 1
    check out SeattleWireless.



    They are using the canberra plans to make helical antennae and set up a city-wide wireless network.


    for free

  12. Re:2.4 GHZ Internet access does exist in my Apt!!! by belial · · Score: 1

    you dont need to hack into the airport. just unscrew it and plug in an antenna. it's an orinocco card and it has an antenna jack built in.

  13. Re:Fosters... by nickread · · Score: 1

    Ahhh, Cascade Premium.... mmmmm...
    Another great one is J.Boags & Sons Premium...

    Funnily enough, both are Tasmania... Must be the clean fresh water we have down here!

  14. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by ozbird · · Score: 1

    The Galaxy "satellite" dishes didn't point at a satellite either. They pointed at a local transmission tower

    I think you may be confusing the two Galaxy dishes. The genuine satellite service used a solid, offset parabolic dish (so that the feedhorn doesn't obstruct the dish), which was pointed at one of the Aussat satellites (IIRC.) The microwave service used a wire mesh "dish" pointed at a base station. The article refers to "Galaxy TV antennas" which sounds more like the microwave antenna.

  15. Just south of Sydney? by imroy · · Score: 2

    Just south of Sydney is.....Wollongong!

    I haven't been to the 'gong for a while, but it most definetely is not our nations captial! I thought Canberra was mostly west from Sydney. Where's my map...

    Nitpick: *sigh* The only place here in Oz that most people know about is the now cliched "Sydney, Australia". Canberra would be better described as "central NSW, where it's bloody cold and only fat-cat pollie's want to stay" :)

    1. Re:Just south of Sydney? by tpv · · Score: 1
      Actually, just south of Sydney is Sutherland and "the shire" residents certainly do think it is the capital of Australia....

      Rant: Why is it that when there's an article mentioning (eg) Denver, we don't get a geography lesson. Do people just assume that the whole #@$^@# world knows US geography? Or is it just that you think that US people can't look at an atlas, but the rest of us can.

      --

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
    2. Re:Just south of Sydney? by imroy · · Score: 1
      Actually, just south of Sydney is Sutherland and "the shire" residents certainly do think it is the capital of Australia....

      Well, whatever. It depends on how far south you go. I just picked the biggest population centre I knew of that was south of Sydney. Give me a break. I'm from Bathurst mostly, and thanks to my "indoors" personality I'm not too hot on geography. Even local stuff I should know :P
      Hey, if there's ever an article on /. about Bathurst, I can come on and complain that you all sound like dickheads pronouncing it with a long "urrr" sound! It really pisses us Bathurst-ians off. ;)

      Rant: Why is it that when there's an article mentioning (eg) Denver, we don't get a geography lesson. Do people just assume that the whole #@$^@# world knows US geography? Or is it just that you think that US people can't look at an atlas, but the rest of us can.

      Well, the internet is still composed mostly of US citizens. And thanks to the US entertainment mega-industry, just about anyone in the world could name about a hundred US cities, towns, and states - and know where alot of them are.

      Besides, there have been other nitpicks before. There has been a few corrections on /. about the exact name of a couple of colleges and universities. And I seem to remember something about Carolina vs South Carolina.

    3. Re:Just south of Sydney? by tpv · · Score: 1
      That wasn't meant to be a dig at you.
      It was a dig at shire-folks.

      Having grown up in Wollongong, my initial reaction was the same as yours. But I lived for almost 18 months in Sutherland, so I know that they really do think they are the centre of Australia...

      Hey I'm all for nitpicks.

      --

      --
      Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.Read more of this story at Slashdot.
  16. ...yes, and with cows... by spacehop · · Score: 1

    great fun - we used a repeater based wavelan setup to reach a laptop attached to a camera mounted on a cow... http://cowcam.co.uk/

  17. Wait until you see what the ABA and ACA say... by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1
    The Australian Communications Authority (ACA) and the Australian Broadcasting Authority (ABA)are going to come down on this like a tonne of bricks.

    The Government here regards spectrum as its own asset not as a community asset to be regulated for the benefit of all.

    They charge BIG dollars for the right to do this kind of thing in "THEIR" spectrum.

    It sucks but thats how the system works.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
    1. Re:Wait until you see what the ABA and ACA say... by Keldar · · Score: 1

      That's the first thing that I thought! The incumbent telcos would also arc up, they cracked it when a group of neighbours attempted to string a cable across the street to create their own community LAN...

  18. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by titus-g · · Score: 2
    The Lopht peeps were setting up something similar as well, and there are quite a few others around as well.

    There was an article at technocrat.net about it, but the search seems to be down so can't find it now, also possibly it was posted on /.?

    Nice if someone could set up a group/site/thing to coordinate things a bit more, save running into IP conflicts (quite a few seem to be going for IPV6) if they get linked together (even if only tunneled through the internet) and to get some linking going of cos :).

    --

    ~ppppppppö

  19. I think the 11th commandment applies here by athmanb · · Score: 1

    Don't let yourself get caught :)

    And with satellite dishes (which transmit directionally), this isn't even too hard to accomplish.
    Unless someone is that stupid to point his antenna directly at some feds, they won't receive the signal, and everything is fine.

    I guess something like that could even be used as some semisecure, because listening in ("wire"-tapping) is kinda impossible if you're not exactly between the sending and the receiving antenna.

    1. Re:I think the 11th commandment applies here by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1
      Or of course you are stupid enough to let it become the talk of the net with a huge peice in slashdot.

      I think the cat is out of the bag and if there is a problem it will soon become apparent.

      --
      'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  20. Irridium? by levik · · Score: 1

    So what about all those irridium sattelites? Or have they burned up already? :) If not, well, this may be a good "cheap" network in the sky.

    --
    Ñ'
  21. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    I'm in NYC (Manhattan and Brooklyn), and would love to see a free wireless service. I'd be willing to set up base in Brooklyn and maybe in Manhattan. I currently have 4 WebGear cards running at home in my LAN. I have also have CDPD service from Verizon at $40/month. It would be a pipe dream if I can dump them and get higher speed service for no cost...

  22. Other Dishes? by mini+me · · Score: 2

    I have an old Bell Expressvu dish kickin around (with the old hardware before the upgrade to the new satellite) anyone get it working with one of these? How about dishes from other vendors? For some reason I cannot load the link so maybe that info is on thier site?

    This could be a good way for people in the country to get higher speed net access. If you can find a near-by friend with high-speed access that is.

  23. England? Scotland maybe? by Y3HarB-y*qOi!(5Q1 · · Score: 1

    Or it could be the classic:

    "The rain in Spain stays mainly on the plain."

    or something like that.

    --
    PejVHF8LRIgynjB0dqjTuH4/8A-Z9#sSQV74sR>S4983w0cSM5
    1. Re:England? Scotland maybe? by aed · · Score: 1

      "The rain in Spain falls mainly on the Spaniards."

  24. Sounds like.. by mindstrm · · Score: 3

    They are simply using the dishes as 2.4Ghz directional antennas.

    Sounds cool, right? Might want to check local regulations for the 2.4Ghz ISM band. You can only have so much gain for so much power... if you try this in the US you might be violating FCC.

  25. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by simong · · Score: 1

    Have a look at consume.net for a similar project that's underway in London, the difference being that it's being designed as a bandwidth sharing scheme so that packets from wireless devices can be forwarded to the general Internet using routers attached to ubiquitous wireless basestations.

  26. Re:Fosters... by Keldar · · Score: 1

    hahaha well I am sure the CUB really does not give a shit

  27. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by titus-g · · Score: 1
    --

    ~ppppppppö

  28. Re:They would say "no" and fine you by titus-g · · Score: 1
    *"The axiom 'An honest man has nothing to fear from the police' is currently under review by the Axiom Review Boa*

    Those bloody snakes get everywhere don't they :)

    --

    ~ppppppppö

  29. Re:"Canberrans"? by child_of_mercy · · Score: 1
    Yes Canberrans... No not Canberries.

    While we are firm and juicy, we only turn red when we get too much sun.

    --
    'There is a Light that never goes out.'
  30. Re:Airlink by strangemoose · · Score: 1

    Ha! How about DSL Installs that arn't possible..
    I asked Tellus and they basically said:
    "The phone lines in that area are so crappy, Its
    a wonder that your phone even works."

    So I went and got cable. and with 200kbps average
    I'm happy. (sometimes up to 300kbps)

    --
    Sig? What sig?
  31. "Canberrans"? by OlympicSponsor · · Score: 2

    Surely they call themselves "Canberries"...
    --

    --
    Non-meta-modded "Overrated" mods are killing Slashdot
    (Hey Ryan! Here's your proof!)
  32. Re:You forgot BSB by titus-g · · Score: 1
    Well, as the guy above posted there is consume.net in London, Edinburgh and Stirling could be good as well as they are on hills so line of sight can be good.

    As for the dishes, haven't been recently, but I'd guess the old non digital ones are probably being given away at most of the auctions in the country.

    *mirroring stuff like DVD decryption software maybe* and of course now with all this censorware and government pressure pr0n is under threat at well, should get mirroring all you can find right now, umm for political purposes of course...

    --

    ~ppppppppö

  33. Pretty cool stuff. by levik · · Score: 1

    Sounds really nice. A good solution for cities. Does it have a gateway to the net at large? If so, when is one coming to New York, and where do I sign up?

    --
    Ñ'
    1. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by dgibson · · Score: 2

      Galaxy wasn't a satellite system. It was a surface pay TV system based on microwave transmissions from Telstra tower on black mountain.

      All that the air.net.au people are using are the now disused microwave antennas - they can often be collected free from people who used to have Galaxy. That makes a very cheap way of getting an ~18dBi antenna.

    2. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by nathanh · · Score: 1

      My bad. I had Galaxy for six months before cancelling the service. I must have had the wire mesh microwave type because my "dish" (a tiny little thing) was aimed directly at Telstra Tower. I didn't realise there was a second type of Galaxy dish built for satellite reception.

    3. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by nathanh · · Score: 3

      You don't need an actual satellite. You just use satellite dishes. The dishes point at each other. They don't point into the skies. They're all pointing at somebody elses dish nearby.

      The Galaxy "satellite" dishes didn't point at a satellite either. They pointed at a local transmission tower (Telstra Tower, or as all the locals call it, Black Mountain Tower).

    4. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by Devil+Ducky · · Score: 2

      This type of system would require an existing Satelite system, such as "Galaxy." Other cities could put a satelite up simply for this purpose, but that would take away the economics of it all.

      Would be much cheaper to run digital lines (phone/cable), and then you wouldn't have to have a sat-dish.

      But it's still cool, just doesn't make sense in somewhere like NYC.

      Might work in rural areas though, they usually have sat-dishes already (for TV) and with the new dishes most places in hicksvilles have a large unused dish and a smaller one for TV.

      Devil Ducky

      --

      Devil Ducky
      MY peers would get out of jury duty.
    5. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by Kickasso · · Score: 2
      This type of system would require an existing Satelite system, such as "Galaxy."

      More precisely, this type of system would require a defunct Satelite system, such as "Galaxy". Or a hardware hacker willing to show you how to make a 2.4GHz antenna.
      --

    6. Re:Pretty cool stuff. by pallex · · Score: 2

      Or a software hacker willing to show you how to make a working satellite system defunct!

  34. Why dosn't the government actually do this by Y3HarB-y*qOi!(5Q1 · · Score: 1

    I would be thrilled to have wireless access via a system like that but I don't think that this will ever happen.

    --
    PejVHF8LRIgynjB0dqjTuH4/8A-Z9#sSQV74sR>S4983w0cSM5
  35. I wonder what the FCC would say... by zonker · · Score: 2
    I wonder what the FCC would say about this if someone did it in the US? The 2.4 Ghz stuff wouldn't be a big deal I guess, but the propagation of the signal may... I dunno, what do you think?

    (Just thinking out loud...)

    / k.d / earth trickle / Monkeys vs. Robots Films /

    1. Re:I wonder what the FCC would say... by mikemsd · · Score: 1

      If you want to try this with the FCC's blessings, I would suggest a Amateur radio license. There is a lot going on in the field of packet radio. The speeds aren't very fast, but the amateur bands have some real possibilities for development, the ham radio community is always looking for people with ideas to help make the hobby even more fun.

    2. Re:I wonder what the FCC would say... by homebru · · Score: 2

      I would suggest a Amateur radio license

      And I would recomend that the hams leave this one alone. You see, if it takes a ham license to run the transmitter, then non-hams can't legally join the fun.

      So, if someone wants to play with this, go read Part 15 of the FCC regulations ("License-free operation and frequencies") and do it there. Legally unlicensed and available to everyone who wants to play.

  36. That's really unfair by JurriAlt137n · · Score: 1

    In Aussi-land, where it's good weather all the time, you might get away with this. In some countries in europe, which we will not mention by name, it is always raining and as such a hell of a lot less fun playing around with satellite dishes outside.

    --

    People replying to my sig annoy me. That's why I change it all the time.
    1. Re:That's really unfair by irc(addict) · · Score: 1

      Seeing as such, that Im an Australian, I can tell you one thing: Good Weather? *BS* ;-) The weather out here can practically make the satellite dishes melt, and we have enough sounden downpours in most of aus, that could flood you out of house and home, if the situation is right. Yet, some how, all of our "bandwitdth" internet is done by these dishes and so is our "cable" TV. (still cant figure out where the cable comes into it) And, what sucks about the bandwidth net, is that is download only, you still have to tie up the phone with out going stuff through your slow dial-up modem. sucks.

  37. YES! Satellite TV Piracy is coming back! by kirwin · · Score: 2

    If you can make a wireless LAN out of old satellite dishes, then you can surely transmit satellite TV from them also, can't you?

  38. FCC rules on 2.4 Ghz by rho · · Score: 3

    There's an EETimes article about it here. To sum up:

    It allows frequency-hopping signals in the 2.4-GHz band to operate at 1, 3 or 5 MHz, with at least 15 non-overlapping channels spread out over a total span of 75 MHz. The average time of occupancy on any frequency shall not be greater than 0.4 seconds, within a 30-second period. The maximum output power is 125 mW at 5 MHz, vs. the 200 mW the HomeRF group had requested.

    This mostly concerns the battle between HomeRF and 802.11, but does give some good info.

    --
    Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    1. Re:FCC rules on 2.4 Ghz by jandrese · · Score: 2

      Of course all Slashdot readers should remember that the FCC has no authority in Australia, so this only applies to people trying to do the same thing in the US.

      --

      I read the internet for the articles.
    2. Re:FCC rules on 2.4 Ghz by rho · · Score: 1

      What? I thought "as USA goes, as does the rest of the world!"?

      Just kidding -- good point. Shoulda added that.

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
  39. Re:Runs on Linux by darksmurf · · Score: 1

    Sorry, I completely disagree with you.

    I prefer wireless linux-driven network information over the repetitive mega-cool/atari-handheld stuff.

    Gee, Slashdot posting things that are not incredibly interesting for every single reader?

    Wah.

    The Slashdot guys do a decent job of getting interesting stuff - no filter is perfect.

    cat Flame.didntmeanto > /dev/null

    Ok, so some filters are perfect.

  40. Re:Runs on Linux by Vanguard(DC) · · Score: 1

    "if Joe Q. Schmuck's shoelace has Linux running on a 2" chip"

    ummm.. id want THAT posted....

    simple.

    ./vanguard

    --
    "I think, therefore I get paid."
  41. Re:Is this even legal? by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Actually.. it isn't directly related to range.
    Directional antennas will let you go quite some distance with standard 2.4Ghz stuff, still within regulations. We've set up some 18 and 19 km links using yagi and sectoral antennas. Of course, caluclations were done to make sure we didn't exceed the acceptable limits.

  42. Radio Modems by SigVn · · Score: 1

    Does anyone remember Radiomodems

    1) what happed to them

    2) could a radio modem be hocked up to a wireless eithernet device

    3) is that what these people have done? Or are they using the dishes as point to point microwave transmiters

    Casue I am a little confused here.

    --
    Yes I can not spell...Wait....for a second there I almost cared.
    1. Re:Radio Modems by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
      Does anyone remember Radiomodems

      http://www.ricochet.com/

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  43. Aussie Pr0n! by jabber01 · · Score: 1
    Australian porn is some of the best!
    I did lots of research into this while in college.
    I sure wish they set up a short-wave version of this system, so I could continue my research here in the States.

    The REAL jabber has the /. user id: 13196

    --

    The REAL jabber has the user id: 13196
    What you do today will cost you a day of your life

  44. Hmmm by glowingspleen · · Score: 1

    A use for old satellites, eh? Now if only we had some unused satellites that covered a large percentage of the planet and were planned to be deorbitted just to waste about a billion dollars of technology for fun... ...but we don't have anything like that, right?

  45. Airlink by Eck · · Score: 1

    This looks like the Internet connectivity offered in Edmonton, Alberta (and elsewhere) by OA Net, where I work. The Airlink service has been a big seller, largely because DSL installs take so fscking long.

  46. Allocating by class C chunks? by b1t+r0t · · Score: 1
    I looked at the IP registry and I noticed that while they are using one of the officially unassigned networks (192.168.x.x), they are assigning it to their members (currently 25 entries in this list) in class C chunks. Obviously they aren't planning on more than 250 or so members. They probably should have used the 10.x.x.x range, but maybe this type of project doesn't scale well past 250 or so sites per wireless network.

    But isn't this kind of thing what gave Fidonet such growing pains? The original Fidonet address spec was two 16 bit integers, but then they had to add zones in front, and they wanted non-dialable client nodes, so points were tacked to the end. Some software never properly supported zones, much less points. (And some TCP/IP software still doesn't support variable length bit masks either.) At least with a full class C per site, they don't have to worry about the "point problem".

    --

    --
    "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
    "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    1. Re:Allocating by class C chunks? by Tuross · · Score: 1
      I'm speaking as someone in Canberra involved in this. It started as a fun hack hobby of people in the Canberra Linux Users Group but the mailing list has people from other states involved as well. Obviously there's no interstate connection since the cards don't transmit with enough power to stretch the 400+ Km to our friends in Sydney or 800+ km to our friends in Melbourne, and further.

      Anyway, there's not even 250 people in the CLUG, let alone doing the WaveLAN thing, so this limit isn't as silly as it sounds. We're not worried about scalability since there's currently more than enough and if the limit is hit, then shock horror we can vi a file and use the 10.0.0.0 network instead. That's enough IP's for every man, woman, child, dog and refrigerator in the territory with room to spare (heck, 256^3 is almost enough for the population of the country).

      The galaxy antennas have worked mostly well though some people have been having more luck with custom helicals (which is also good since the galaxy ones are rare, anyway it's more fun to build your own)

      One big problem we have at the moment is between the north and south side is a fair bit of non-residential area (read: parks, public land, parliament house, etc) a wideish lake, and a mountain - which is making a north-south link impossible due to the short range of the cards. The guys north-side (the main instigators) have been having more luck as the terrain south-side messes with LOS more.

      Anyway its a lot of fun and I encourage other people who like hacking and get bored with ethernet networks to get involved in something similar in your area. We've already got a splinter group iirc which are using a different card which has a longer range and more bandwidth, and works with modern hardware (the main problem with the wavelan cards imho - full-length 8-bit ISA)
      --
      Matt

      --
      Matt
      1. Read Slashdot
      2. ???
      3. Profit
    2. Re:Allocating by class C chunks? by drwho · · Score: 1

      There's an upper limit to the number of devics you can have on a given wavelan network anyhow, i think it might be 252. Which means that you'd have to start routing anyhow.

  47. Not just canberra by BlackLight · · Score: 1
    dont give all those canberries all the credit, cause it isnt just them setting it up. Adelaide, Melbourne and the entire state of tasmania (the one at the bottom, that always gets left off the maps are also setting up similar things. Finally, we australians have had an idea before the americans! too bad about the FCC... HAHAHAHA

    go to http://www.adelaide.air.net.au for news on our exploits or http://www.tas.air.net for tasmanian info. Melbourne doesnt have a site yet.

    1. Re:Not just canberra by Chuq · · Score: 1

      heheh - on http://www.tas.air.net.au:

      "website coming back again soon..."

      oh well...

      All of Tasmania? That'd be nice.. but the place is 400km's from one corner to the other. At the moment it is focused on the biggest cities Hobart (mainly western shore) and Launceston.

      And seeing as our site is so non-existant - please email the list at wireless@taslug.org.au, or look in IRC at irc.slashnet.org #vortex (and msg acb and call him a whore)

      --
      - Chuq
    2. Re:Not just canberra by andrewcb · · Score: 1

      yep, that'd be correct :>

      we are slowly working on getting the site back up.

      The major problems we have at the moment are as Chuq says, the area to cover is massive - and capital here is minimal, so if anyone would like to donate to a good cause (hell, we'll even incorporate ourselves especially so you know you aren't being ripped off) then we'll love you for ever :>

      --
      --- acb!irc.slashnet.org
  48. I live in Canberra by G-funk · · Score: 1

    I live in Canberra, and while I'm not a part of the geek scene, a lot of my mates are (my copy of mirc is still zipped). If somebody wanted to hassle some of the geeks involved, you can bet you'll find them at #canberra on the local efnet (no, no idea what that is). But what I can tell you is, this is soooooooo far from news it's not funny, this project has been underway for at least a year or two. I used to be interested, but it's just not that great, and afaik most of the people involved are in belconnen and you need to be within x kilometres (about 2.5???) to use it.

    Gfunk

    --
    Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  49. Aussie beers (sort of off topic :) by kubrick · · Score: 1

    If you want a good Australian beer try Cascade Premium, and if you want the beer that we all drink get VB or XXXX. They won't win any competitions but they do the job, and don't completely taste like piss.

    Cascade is a good beer, as is anything by Coopers and James Boag. Unfortuantely, VB and XXXX do taste completely like piss.... Toohey's Old & and Toohey's New aren't too bad if you're stuck in Sydney, though.

    The main reason VB sells so well in Victoria and XXXX in Queensland is saturation marketing of their home turf.

    --
    deus does not exist but if he does
  50. Re:Fosters... by linzeal · · Score: 1

    6.25 Australian dollars = 3.53 US dollars Back in kentucky we call that a 12 pack of Old Millwakuee (sp?), and when I was in minnesota for a year they called it pig's eye.

  51. Re:I Thought Aussies Were Stupid by Big+Ben+August · · Score: 1

    Wait a minute...
    Look at Elle McPherson (sp?).

    --Ben

    --
    --Ben
  52. old Primestar dish? by RocketRay · · Score: 1

    I've got an old Primestar dish taking up space in my patio (when they "upgraded" me to DirecTV they didn't take it). I wonder if anything can be done like that with old Primestar dishes.

  53. Re:Fosters... by CukO · · Score: 2

    Funnily enough, Australians don't drink fosters.I am Australian and have lived/been to all of the major cities and regional centres and not once have I seen anyone (with the exception of a few tourists) drink fosters.
    In fact most of the pubs in Sydney don't have it. Fosters was labeled as piss by Australians a long time ago, so they decided to spend a pretty penny on international marketing to get everyone else to drink it.

    If you want a good Australian beer try Cascade Premium, and if you want the beer that we all drink get VB or XXXX. They won't win any competitions but they do the job, and don't completely taste like piss.

    In regards to the wireless lan I am interested as too whether our FCC will nab them for it.

    Cheers :)

    Now where did I leave the keys to my kangaroo?

  54. Re:They're already sort of doing this in the US by doolsap · · Score: 1

    yeah- I've used the similar service in Santa Fe, with an antenna mounted on my roof- the article opens up new possibilities of taking it mobile, though- does one need line of sight to the antenna?

  55. "lan"? by ignorant_newbie · · Score: 1

    um... wouldn't that be _w_an? notmally i wouldn't be that picky, but this is slashdot afterall.

  56. FCC? by tooth · · Score: 1

    I seem to be seeing lots of questions about the FCC, but in .au it's the SMA (spectrum managment athourity) that handles this (same thing, just different letters). I have no idea on broadcast rules in .au, maybe there are some amatuer radio people here that can explain it better?

  57. Re:This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellit by dgibson · · Score: 2

    Actually the Galaxy antennas in question do include a downconverter/preamplifier which needs to be ripped out before they can be used for transmission.

  58. Re:Remote access by dgibson · · Score: 2

    Not really. In order to get the distances, you need to use fairly highly directional antennas. So the restaurant would have to be very well located, and then you'd have to get your dish in to line of sight of another antenna and carefully line it up.

  59. Re:Fosters... by deniable · · Score: 1
    I didn't realise people really drunk XXXX, except in rural Queensland?

    Kinda like the old joke: Why do they call it XXXX?

    Because Queenslanders can't spell Beer. :)

  60. Uhhh... by Torak- · · Score: 2

    Not that it would matter whether the FCC allowed it or not, since the FCC HAS NO AUTHORITY OUTSIDE THE UNITED STATES. Fucking insular Americans.

  61. Re:Fosters... by stylewagon · · Score: 1

    Doesn't the statistic go that the top selling beer in London is Fosters?

    I agree that no Australian in their right mind would drink Fosters. During the Olympics here in Sydney they had a massive marketing blitz - including a vain effort to boost sales - a buy-one-fosters-get-another-free promotion.

    They couldn't even give the stuff away...

    Still they had a half-decent ad campaign during the olympics.

    Another beer urban legend is that CUB introduced Melbourne Bitter into NSW after shifting the brewing of NSW-distro Victoria Bitter to Sydney. Seems everyone noticed the taste change when they stopped using water from the Yarra and used Sydney tap water instead... ie. Melbourne Bitter is the old VB brewed in Melbourne. Anyone confirm?

    --

    *** I am the real stylewagon

  62. Dell's wireless solution by Fervent · · Score: 2
    Somewhat "offtopic", but not really, has anyone tried the solution Dell offers for wireless? I bought a laptop from them a few days ago and decided to opt for their wireless cards and base station. Thank god for payment plans.

    Is it is as good as Airport?

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Dell's wireless solution by Fervent · · Score: 2
      That's it. "True mobile". Hopefully it'll be worth the purchase.

      It should also be interesting to see if I can get it to play nicely with Linux. I'll keep a Windows 98 partition around just in case.

      --

      - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    2. Re:Dell's wireless solution by ostiguy · · Score: 2

      It probably is Airport, which is all still Lucent gear, from what I have read.

  63. You forgot BSB by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    There must be a lot of unused BSB satellite dishes kicking around the UK worth practically zip by now Also with people dumping their old sky dishes for 'digi dishes' for sky digital pretty soon their will be a lot of old sky dishes going cheap Sod the weather, surely it would be worth setting up a network live this just for gaming and mirroring stuff like DVD decryption software maybe ?...

  64. They would say "no" and fine you by disc-chord · · Score: 1

    I'm not 100% positive, but I'm pretty sure wireless phones (the ones you have a base station for a ground line, not cell or pcs) have the FCC in their pocket for the 2.4ghz range. Quite a shame really, I'd love to run around town with a constant connection to the net.(read: not with one of those silly little phones)

    Good luck to anyone thinking of talking the FCC into giving up any air space for such an endevour. They rake in millions by selling the air to private corps, and are not likely to just give it away in an effort to "do the right thing", I'm affraid.

    disc-chord
    "though we say, 'all information should be free', it is not... information is power and currency in the virtual world we inhabit."-Billy Idol (1994)

    1. Re:They would say "no" and fine you by Tassach · · Score: 2
      Actually (IIRC) The 2.4GHz spectrum slice is globally unregulated -- anyone can use it for whatever they want to use it for. Of course this means you can't complain to the FCC (or it's equivilent) if somebody else is causing interference on that frequency. There are a bunch of unregulated (or semi-regulated) frequencies that can be used for consumer products. The frequencies used by cordless (handset) phones are one example; WaveLAN is another. Some of these frequencies are totally fair game; others have a cap on the amount any one station can broadcast (Like CB radio, which is limited to 3 watts, IIRC).

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    2. Re:They would say "no" and fine you by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      there would be _no_ problem doing this, the 2.4Ghz spectrum is _freely_ available for use in the US,
      and people have been using this same stuff for a while now here.

      --
      .
  65. Re:Fosters... by RedX · · Score: 2

    I read recently during the pre-Olympic hype that Fosters only has something like 2% of the beer market in Australia. Fosters was also actually started by 2 Americans who opened a brewery in Australia.

  66. Questions, questions, too many questions! by Mikeytsi · · Score: 4

    Since there's a whole bunch of questions on this, and I've got some experience in this arena, I'll impart some of my knowledge.

    No, it's not illegal. The 2.4Ghz band is a public band, so it's not tightly regulated by the FCC. It's a real pain in the ass when you've got a whole bunch of people running in the frequency range in the same area though,... (Guess how I know this?)

    Provided you could get a signal, you'd be able to connect to the network from anywhere. All you need is a wireless ethernet card, and the information on how to connect to the network. (I currently have two different wireless PCMCIA cards, and should be getting a third soon). An actual "dish" is not necessary.

    "Rain Fade" isn't really an issue, unless you're talking HEAVY rain. Rain Fade is a lot more of a problem when you're actually going through the cloud cover (a-la Satellite). The wireless stuff they're doing doesn't work that way.

    That about covers it. BTW, the company that I work for is getting into this technology REALLY heavy in the US. Especially since Cisco bought Aironet, which has a wirless system that communicates at 11Mbps. That's pretty damn fast for radio, people.

    --
    I've been called a "Fucking Dick" by better people than you.
  67. How about DirectTV dishes? by fprintf · · Score: 1

    Anyone ever used DirectTV dishes for this sort of thing? I know they are expensive right now, but in the long term they might become cheap.

    Thx.

    --
    This post brought to you by your friendly neighborhood MBA.
    1. Re:How about DirectTV dishes? by Peter+Simpson · · Score: 1

      Usually, they use yagi "beam" antennas, but there
      have been articles on reusing digital satellite TV
      dishes in the "ham" publications (QEX, I think).
      There are several web pages on high speed packet
      radio at 10 GHz as well.

  68. no guys, not sattelite dishes by coliano · · Score: 1

    The article says that they're using mostly old helical type antennas, no reference to sattelite dishes. Think about it, with a dish you need line of site, usually to a sattelite although, you could problably set up some type of dish to dish relay system but that would require an impossible network of dishes. These guys are using omni-directional RF to do this. There's no way dishes could be used for a system like this unless it was a simple point to point connection and even then, I don't think you'd be able to use the WaveLan cards mentioned in the article. So don't get your hopes up for that collapsible, portable laptop connected take anywhere dish cause the reality is even better-AFAIK the hardware is small and can be made extremely portable you just have a limited travel range.

    1. Re:no guys, not sattelite dishes by tjones · · Score: 1
      Helicals are directional, maybe not as focused as a dish, but directional regardless.

      Although I imagine with an antenna every 120 degrees or so you could fairly well emulate an omni antenna. Why you would want to is left to your imagination.

    2. Re:no guys, not sattelite dishes by dgibson · · Score: 2

      It most certainly is point to point. There's no way you'd get the distances covered here with omnidirectional within the legal power limits. The Galaxy antennas aren't "satellite dishes" as such (Galaxy was a surface system), just directional microwave antennas.

    3. Re:no guys, not sattelite dishes by coliano · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the clarification, I'm certainly not an expert on the subject. Do you think this means that each "node" would have to have mulitple transciever stations in order to relay the signal to someone further "down the line"? I was visualizing a system sort of like that used by cell phones where the distribution of transcievers creates a blanket of coverage for a particular area; as long as you're within range of at least one other transciever, you got a signal. Or are there just particular internet access points, any one of which must be within the range of your transciever?

  69. Ambient Signal in Canberra by Gefiltefish · · Score: 1

    So, let me see.. this means that I could go for a walk through Canberra and get hit be some stray signal from a mpeg featuring Pamela Anderson hard at work??

    Awesome!

  70. Re:They're already sort of doing this in the US by Cy+Guy · · Score: 1

    I think LoboNet gets their technology from uSurf America that has several patents on the technology. They are the parent company of CyberHighway, a nationawide ISP.

    These old wireless cable systems are all over the country, Sprint has bought up a lot of them.

    By the way, there are no satellites involved. Why does everyone assume that a dish antenna has to be for satellite?

  71. Re:Europe has the Psion Wavefinder by SigVn · · Score: 1

    thx.

    Now all I have to do is get it in Canada.

    --
    Yes I can not spell...Wait....for a second there I almost cared.
  72. Re:I'm all for it by skroz · · Score: 1

    Why would you EVER pay for a T1 to connect to "the building next door" when you can get a laser or microwave link for a ONE TIME COST reoughly half that of the monthly charge for your T1??? And it would be FASTER???

    --
    -- Minds are like parachutes... they work best when open.
  73. Re:Fosters... by drwho · · Score: 1

    I have to agree that Fosters is crap. Knowing that Australians don't actually drink it makes me have a bit more respect for them.

  74. Re:Fosters... by Goonie · · Score: 1
    If you want a good Australian beer try Cascade Premium, and if you want the beer that we all drink get VB or XXXX.

    Personally I prefer James Boag's Premium Lager. Like Cascade, it's brewed in Tasmania, and Boag's has recently been bought out by San Miguel (big Philippines-based multinational brewer) so you might actually get a chance to find the stuff overseas now. Very smooth drink.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  75. Don't forget by mattbee · · Score: 2

    Seeing as nobody seems to have mentioned it, there's a similar initiative being started by consume.net, aiming to do much the same thing around London in the UK. The first masts are going up at the moment, and apparently you can get quite a good range from the `Sarah Lee antenna', i.e. made out of a cake tin and coathangers :-) Maybe somebody who's actually used one can fill me in here, but the mention of it on the mailing list made me laugh.

    --
    Matthew @ Bytemark Hosting
  76. Re:Fosters... by kzharv · · Score: 1

    An interesting point is that when Carlton & United (the makers of Fosters) export Foster it is not the same as what you get in oz. It is actually Crown Larger which, in Australia, is a "premium" local beer.
    So Foster in other parts of the world is better than in .au.

    Just my input on this (off)topic.

  77. Re:Fosters... by Keldar · · Score: 1

    I think the Aussie cricket team drinks XXXX too... because it is free. At the Olympics, all I saw was Fosters, it was pretty funny. It was actually the first time I had ever drunk a genuine Foster's Lager. I have got into that Foster's Extra stuff, but it isn't quite the same now is it... VB forever! BJ

  78. Re:Fosters... by perthling · · Score: 1

    Well it couldn't possibly be any _worse_ than it is in .au!!!
    Crown is quite nice IMHO, especially with a wicked curry.

  79. Re:Fosters... by jbrw · · Score: 2

    I didn't realise people really drunk XXXX, except in rural Queensland?

    For Australians in the UK (such as myself), here's some happy news: VB distribution seems to be improving. It's imported from Oz, and Sainsburys is stocking it (at some stores in London, at any rate) at a reasonable price.

    Woo!

    The pubs i've seen it in seem to charge about £2.50 (~AUS$6.25) for a can...

    ...j

  80. Iridium Defunct by envisionary · · Score: 1

    I might point out that as of March 17, Iridium was no longer functional in it's original sense. As a matter of fact the last functioning systems are now down as of Sept 1. The following is a little link regarding the previous:

    Dear Valued Motorola Customer:

    As you know, Iridium LLC ended commercial service on March 17 of this year. Since then, some limited Iridium service has continued to be available in some geographic areas, depending on the operational status of the various Gateways and Service Providers, while the plan for decommissioning the Iridium System was being finalized. As we have indicated in our communications with our customers, and Gateways and Service Providers around the world, since March 17, there has been the possibility that any remaining Iridium service could end at anytime, without any advance notice.


    More of this can be found at the following: http://www.mot.com/satellite/info/

  81. Europe has the Psion Wavefinder by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    Check out This page at The Register

    To quote...

    "Revolutionary" products are announced daily in the IT business, but Psion's latest, the Wavefinder, could genuinely merit the tag on a couple of fronts. The price is only a temporary breakthrough, because receivers from the consumer electronics outfits will ultimately match and then beat it, but the association with PCs is a smart notion, as is the bundling approach. The Wavefinder, a sort of 'soap on a rope' affair you stick to the wall behind your PC, is bigger than you expected from the pictures, but there are obvious advantages for Psion in presenting it with a simple USB connection that allows it to get display, control and power from the PC 'for free.' And when it ships in the UK in two weeks time it will be free, for people buying the right PCs from retail giant Dixons/PC World. That's a tempting bundle that should help Psion punch above its weight, and steal a march on Japan's electronics giants.

    The broader revolutions, however, are more easily grasped when you consider what digital radio is, and the implications of it becoming a ubiquitous PC peripheral. Digital radio currently exists as high quality, multi-channel audio broadcasting (in Europe - the US seems to be two years behind, with an inferior system, again), but although that's cool, start thinking of digital radio as the ability to throw miscellaneous free broadband stuff at computer users everywhere and you see rather wider potential.

    It can do pictures, hook into Web sites, it can broadcast Web sites. You can be listening to a song, decide you like it, find out the name of the band then just click through to a Web site to buy the CD. Or - the fatal, Napster-style flaw in the thinking of people who think they'll make money out of this - you can just record it directly into MP3 format. Or look at it from the point of view of the wireless network operators who've just coughed up tens of billions for their 3G licences.

    Their thinking, as far as broadband wireless is concerned, has been that they'll be able to use their vast future bandwidth for music, video, multimedia, and that they'll be able to recoup their investment by charging for this. So imagine their surprise in recent months when they've 'discovered' a bunch of broadband wireless franchises that were sold for a song, and that are now in the hands of broadcast operations who're familiar with the concept of dishing out content for free.

    Sounds kinda similar to what you want, if you live in Europe you're in luck ;)

  82. More like a WAN by suitcase · · Score: 1

    This is more like a WAN, campus sized deal(or bigger). If only I didn't live in such an urban area I would buy a rig like this for almost any price to link up to work.

  83. Re:This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellit by levik · · Score: 1

    OK, so I always thought that sattelite dishes were used to RECEIVE stuff, which works fine for downstream. How is upstream handled?

    --
    Ñ'
  84. 2.4 GHZ Internet access does exist in the US !!! by DEADJEDI · · Score: 1

    2.4 GHZ Internet access does exist in the US, I should know, I helped design and build the network for the ISP. All Wavelan, different combos of antennas, shooting upwards of 11Mb at 3-20 miles out from a 23 story building. They were using LINUX ROUTER PROJECT as their customer premise router/NAT box, etc... Where you ask... Flint, Michigan of all places :)

  85. Re:I Thought Aussies Were Stupid by geobaker · · Score: 1

    Or Rachel Hunter or a couple of women on the Australian Soccer team or.... And please, like the US doesn't have it's fair share (or more, if you count ugliness due to post-implant probs.) of ugly women (and men)...

  86. Re:Fosters... by JCMay · · Score: 1
    Too bad all the Fosters I've ever seen was brewed in Canada.

    Jeff

  87. We're doing it in the UK by MadMax · · Score: 2

    www.tele2.co.uk

  88. Re:This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellit by Tassach · · Score: 3
    An antenna dosn't really do anything by itself. It all depends what you hook up to it. If you connect a receiver to an antenna, all you can do is recieve stuff. If you hook a tranciever up to it, you can transmit & receive.

    There's no real technical difference between the antenna a radio station uses to broadcast it's signal and the antenna on your car that you use to pick up that signal. The difference between a dish antenna and a linear antenna is that the dish is fairly directional whereas the linear antenna is omnidirectional.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  89. Some Mac users have been doing stuff like this. by Asterix72 · · Score: 1

    Slashdot reported on some Mac users using their Airport cards and various antennas/dishes to accomplish similar things as our pals down under. http://slashdot.org/articles/00/04/06/1235248.shtm l Here is a link to the article referenced by Slashdot that details what these Mac users were doing. http://macintouch.com/airportantenna.html

  90. Remote access by Flounder · · Score: 2
    Can this network be accessed with a portable dish? Sit in an outdoor cafe, setup your laptop and a collapsible 1 meter dish and surf at some decent speeds. And no mobile phone charges. Man, I'd pay for that.

    Besides, how cool would it be to be sitting in a restaurant with a satellite dish?

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

    1. Re:Remote access by Jarvo · · Score: 1

      (I'm not speaking from experience here, so take it with a grain of salt)

      Most of the antennas they are working with would be uni-directional. i.e. You have to point them toward another antenna that is pointing at you. This is inherited from the satellite dishes that are used.

      The omnidirectional antenna designs that the website links to would be what you need. Also, you would have to stay within range of your nearest network gateway to access the internet to get outside.

      How long is it before some Bluetooth or WAP people start crying "patent infringement"?

  91. Govermental Regulations? by katzegott · · Score: 1

    Is there any Govermental Regulator like the FCC that would consider this type of communication against the law? Or is this the type of situation where the power of the dishes isn't large enough to have regulations? (although I would think it would be plenty of power) Just think of the possibilites with that type of system in any big US city... You possibly could take your laptop in your car (for cheap) just as long as you were in the signal's range.

  92. Runs on Linux by Swede2048 · · Score: 2

    I'll probably get Troll -1, or flamed for saying this, but does anyone really care about the "oh, and it runs on Linux!" tagline lately? It's getting to the point where if Joe Q. Schmuck's shoelace has Linux running on a 2" chip that suddenly this is a Slashdot-worthy article.. This is not news for nerd.. It's news for lamers. Now if you're going to put up a tutorial on writing a driver for this dinky little device, or one of the "making-of" type pages (as with the mega-cooled systems, the atari-handheld thing, etc), then I don't mind. But can we stop with the, "OOOOH! The article mentions the letters l-i-n-u-x in succession, let's post the sucker!!" stories? Just my thoughts

    1. Re:Runs on Linux by Tsujigiri · · Score: 1
      Firstly it's not Just your thoughts in fact their not thoughts at all, just a knee jerk reaction to the word Linux in an article. The word Linux doesn't even appear on the Frontpage blurb, you have to see the full posting.

      Also if you bothered to go to the home page of the project you would have seen that it is an effort by a bunch of Linux enthusiasts to build a high-speed wireless network in some parts of Canberra.

      So the mention of Linux down the bottom of the post is actually quite subttle. The article could have been titled Linux Enthusiasts Put Old Pay-TV Dishes To Use -- As A LAN as that's what it is really about.

      Next to reply to Now if you're going to put up a tutorial on writing a driver for this dinky little device, or one of the "making-of" type pages; if you actually go to the link you'll see on the page the section:

      Antenna designs

      Jason Hecker has an excellent document on his helical antenna design.

      Tony Langdon has design details for a high gain 2.4 GHz omnidirectional antenna. Look for the links that refer to a 2.4 GHz antenna.

      Finnally if I look at the Frontpage of /. at the time of posting, there are only 3 out of 23 stories that are directly Linux related and 2 others that are indirectly related. This is not quite the enviroment for rampant Oooh ooh they mentioned Linux, they must be l4m3rz!!!!!! Kill the pengiun!!!! rants

      --

      "I'll take the red pill. No! Blue! AAAaaaahhhhhhhhh"
      - Monty Python meets the Matrix

  93. Re:transmission technology issues/bandwidth? by Millennium · · Score: 1

    Dude, where do you get this stuff?

    Honest question here. I doubt you're making this up yourself, and I want to see the real source of this.

    Oh, and do stop with the goatse.cx linking in the sig, "Bob." No one (and it probably really is at least pretty close to "no one") wants to see that. Your trolling stands just fine on its own.
    ----------

  94. Fosters... by FortKnox · · Score: 4

    A scene of a man eating a steak, and hooking an old dish into his 8088 computer
    An aussie voice with aussie accent: Local area network

    A can of fosters smacking the floor...
    An aussie voice with aussie accent: Beer... Fosters... Australian for beer.


    -- Don't you hate it when people comment on other people's .sigs??

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Fosters... by Tsujigiri · · Score: 1
      If you want a good Australian beer try Cascade Premium, and if you want the beer that we all drink get VB or XXXX. They won't win any competitions but they do the job, and don't completely taste like piss.

      VB!!!!!! Victoria Bitter is perhaps the worst beer in Australia (kinda like Visual Basic). I don't think I actually know anyone who would say they drink it. Cascade Premium not too bad, but here in Adelaide, the best would have to be Coopers. Especially their Dark Ale. Yummy. In fact I could do with one right now, all this VB is making me sick (Visual Basic that is, I'm at work). Although I tend to drink Irish/Scottish beers myself, all those ales like liquid silk. Ooouuuuggghhhhhweeelalkshjdfowienlznfvvvsrvnoslrgd gamuclmzlikjnjdofliar.aC Q@$%^@^$$%!DSDZVQ$%FR$@$%235234q%23dqc24rwef..... (Thump)....

      --

      "I'll take the red pill. No! Blue! AAAaaaahhhhhhhhh"
      - Monty Python meets the Matrix

    2. Re:Fosters... by jaymz666 · · Score: 1

      Actually, as I like to say about Fosters

      Fosters... Australian for Bud

    3. Re:Fosters... by DHam · · Score: 1
      If you want to drink good Australian Beer, drink Coopers. Bottle conditioned and with a bit of flavour, not like VB, XXXX or (heaven forbid) Fosters. If you can't get Coopers then Toohey's Old is another good option.

      Since this is an article about Canberra, I should also point out that for REALLY good Australian beer one need go no further than the the Wig and Pen in the city. They brew their own beer in a variety of styles and have a wall full of prizes for it. As a bonus, the Wig and Pen is around the corner from LinuxCare's Australian office and just off the campus of The Australian National University so it's perfectly placed for the geek about town in Canberra.

    4. Re:Fosters... by CukO · · Score: 1

      There was VB at the olympics as well.
      In fact I saw a bunch of fosters workers wearing their official sponsors hats and shirts completely decked out in fosters apparel drinking VB :)
      Thats one way to get yourself fired.

    5. Re:Fosters... by Kanasta · · Score: 1

      SHaddup or I'll set my pet roo on ya!


      ---

  95. Is this even legal? by jandrese · · Score: 2

    I don't know about Australia, but here in the US there are strict limits on what you can do with te 2.4GHz band, including rather low caps on the total transmitting power which limits the range of any sort of home network.
    Does anyone with experiance in the aussie equivelent of the FCC have any insight into this?
    Oh, and the link in the article should point to www.air.net.au.

    --

    I read the internet for the articles.
    1. Re:Is this even legal? by DHam · · Score: 1
      The Australian equivalent of the FCC is the Australian Communications Authority, formerly known as the Spectrum Management Authority. Hunting through their site, the only things I could see which appeared relevant were some stuff which implied you need a licence to broadcast in the 2300-2400MHz band and a class exemption for on-site office equipment (like conventional wave-lans, for an example). So it looks like you might need a licence to do this.

      A small point for whoever suggested finding cheaper cards (and don't forget, that $150 was almost certainly in Australian Dollars), there are pretty tight restrictions on importation of radio devices to Australia. In particular, you need to make shure there is an ACA permit in force for that device.

      A small trivia point for anyone else who lives in Canberra: I think the ACA have their offices in Belconnen in the Benjamin Offices.

    2. Re:Is this even legal? by kd5biv · · Score: 1
      It's not a licensed band, and is mostly kept open for noise generated by these devices.
      It is licensed if you want to go narrowband -- amateur radio has a secondary allocation on the 2.4 GHz band. Not like NFM and DSSS are going to interefere with each other very much, but the potential is there.

      One thing that could be tricky, though, is if FM-video amateur TV gets as popular on 2.4 as it is on 1.2 .. those signals spread out a bit .. ;-)

      --


      73 de N5VB (ex-KD5BIV) AR SK
    3. Re:Is this even legal? by driftingwalrus · · Score: 3

      To my understanding, the limits are only on the outer edges of the band.

      2.4GHz is an ISM band(Industry, Science, Medical), so it gets used by microwaves, X-Ray machines, etc. It's not a licensed band, and is mostly kept open for noise generated by these devices.

      --
      Paul Anderson
      "I drank WHAT?!" -- Socrates
    4. Re:Is this even legal? by irc(addict) · · Score: 1

      Uhm, it is already pointing to air.net.au. And no, there isnt that much of a limit that i know of. (Me Aussie)

    5. Re:Is this even legal? by simong · · Score: 2

      2.4GHz is the assigned band for wireless networking in the UK and assumes a mean range per device of about 300 metres. By extension it's probably the same in Australia.

  96. prices by andrewmuck · · Score: 1
    I looked into buying some of the cards mentioned and found that there are none left :( You can get some nice new ones(2mbit) but instead of $150 they are about $250+GST, initial price quoted was $310 thats $165 for PCMCIA card and $145 for ISA or PCI adapter. Plus add on our 10% GST.
    Alternatively you could build your own.
    If anyone has some old cards for sale at reasonable price, I am in the Perth area W.A!

    cya, Andrew...

    --
    This is my sig, exciting huh!
  97. If you can make a wireless LAN out of old satellite dishes, then you can surely transmit satellite TV from them also, can't you?

    You can beam it into another user's satellite receiver, if he happens to be pointing at you (unlikely) or you're right off the edge of his dish (where most parabolic reflector antennas have a minor lobe.)

    You'd have a tough time uplinking to the satellite. I understand the receivers are at a very different frequency from what the little piepans handle.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  98. What about... by xtermz · · Score: 1

    using actuall satellites? I know for a fact that the HAM radio community has pulled together and gotten their own satellite put into orbit. How about an Open Source satellite system?. It would free us from commercial and governmental regulations. There is enough money out there , with all the dot com'mers and such poppin up...to do something like this. And with contributions from commercial organizations, the HW can be acquired. Its a real possibility...

    "sex on tv is bad, you might fall off..."

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
  99. This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellites by Tassach · · Score: 3
    Did everyone here fail 3rd grade reading comprehension?

    The network described in the article uses WaveLAN cards connected to old dish antennas. You could do the same thing with just about any other parabolic antenna you might have access to (DirecTV, anyone?). At no time does the signal bounce off a satellite -- this is all line-of-sight between two or more ground-based nodes.

    Please stop talking about Iridium or anything else in orbit. You are only making a fool of yourself by doing so.

    --
    Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  100. Canberra also has 51 Mbps Fiber To The Curb ! by ccomfort · · Score: 2

    Canberra has also been rolling out 'high capacity optic fibres to within 300 metres of individual homes. The last segment of the connection to the home consists of copper wires, similar to those used in office local area networks. The total bandwidth to every home is a massive 51mbps downstream and 1.6mbps upstream.' I think this is supposed to be a world first. I'm sure this must have already been covered. http://www.csu.edu.au/special/raiss99/papers/cvivi an/

  101. 2.4 GHZ Internet access does exist in my Apt!!! by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2

    Courtesy of the rock-solid and easy-to-setup Apple AirPort.. I have an Orinoco (nee WaveLAN) board in my W2k laptop (ProntoEdit and the TrueSync on my fone only work with Win32 :() and my signal is outstanding..

    At work we demo'd a point2point wireless installation between 2 buildings using 14dB Yagi directional antennae. Solid connection even without direct line of sight (a couple of buildings in the way).. Very impressed..

    Now I just have to get a nice amplified omnidirecitonal antenna for my apt (and hack into the airport to solder the antenna connection ;) so I can compute out on the shared patio..

    Your Working Boy,

  102. Primestar dishes by radiashun · · Score: 1

    I always wondered if it would be possible to create some sort of mini-VLA with a bunch of Primestar dishes. I know this wouldn't be the easiest of tasks, but harder stuff has been done right? I mean, according to THIS article there were 2.3 million Primestar subscribers when DirecTV decided to buy them out. That means that there are about 2.3 million Primestar satellite dishes sitting around being useless.. there's gotta be something cool to use them for. Spiffy new high-speed file-sharing network? A VLA rival (I don't actually know if this would be possible because I'm not an astronomer)? Bah, the possibilities are endless.

  103. Re:This uses satellite DISHES people, not satellit by Decado · · Score: 1

    So now people can take down the network just by bumping into the sattelite dishes and knocking them off track. Should definitely make life easier for the more malicious types out there :)

    --

    Slashdot: Proof that a million monkeys at a million typewriters can create a masterpiece

  104. About the FCC by piku · · Score: 1

    Last time I checked the FCC doesn't regulate foreign countries.

  105. pr0n? Never. by GianfrancoZola · · Score: 1

    Who would think of perverting a new bit of technical ingenuity for the use
    of pr0n? Surely there's no precedent for that??

    Just think of cheap wireless combined with wearable computing. Nobody would
    ever get anything done and downloading of pr0n would climb to unheard of levels. :)

  106. I'm all for it by HasH_Browns37 · · Score: 1

    No more T-1 to connect to the building next door. Where can I get the HW? HasH_Browns

    --

    scattered covered smothered chunked

  107. Necessary to mention Linux by Fervent · · Score: 4

    Not to be hypocritical, but did the poster just mention the word "Linux" to get the article accepted more easily? I would have thought the hardware news would've carried on its own.

    --

    - I don't care if they globalize against free speech. All my best free thoughts are done in my head.

    1. Re:Necessary to mention Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Nope it wasn't neccessary but the site which is making this gear is using linux to power it. They are using some drivers that one guy wrote for linux. Have you guys even read the site? Have you seen their guide for making your own satellite reciever? I didn't know that PVC could be used. B.K

    2. Re:Necessary to mention Linux by Jawbox · · Score: 1

      No, the Linux mention is from the original article on Insane Hardware. Actually, the Slashdot article is pretty much just the Extreme article cut and pasted. (Thats why the html link is bad.)

  108. We're sort of doing this in Lithuania by Ainis · · Score: 2

    Academical and Research Network in Lithuania (LITNET) is widely using wavelan technology. For example radio network covers entire Vilnius city (it's our capital with ~700'000 population).

    Check out the map of this network (I'm very lucky to live on one of those small red dots :)). We've recently upgraded most of our wavelans in Vilnius from 2mbit/s to 10mbit/s. It's a pitty this network has only 2mbit connection to the world.

    If you wish to learn more about technology we use go here, to learn more about Litnet go here

  109. Quite Common by Wolfbaine · · Score: 1

    This is actually becoming quite common in Australia. There are two projects I know of in Western Australia alone. The one Im involved in is the Perth LAN project. (Please be real gentle, the link its on is very slow. Ill see if I can get a mirror up.)

    This project is based around spread spectrum WaveLAN cards, running at 11MB/s encrypted. The system is based around Debian routers, though there are a few windows boxes on the network at the moment. A link to tie this network into the internet is underway. (At the moment it relies on a tenuous routing arrangement from a collection of modems.)If you're interested in this please mail at:
    intra@it.net.au
    --or--
    ryan@slowest.net

  110. Re:Here's the link... by irc(addict) · · Score: 1

    Without trying to start a flame war, get a clue mate. its in the Actual Article, its in Related links, and then you post this? If I didnt know better, Id classify it as 'flamebait' not 'redundant'. actually, Id have both.. :-) "Go ahead, moderate me down."

  111. FCC equivalent in your country (Re:Uhhh...) by NKJensen · · Score: 1

    Any country has an authority with the same goals as the FCC:

    Set up limits for frequencies and radiation levels so that most people can use the air for communictions.

    In my case, they are called "Telestyrelsen".

    Torak - would you like that the strongest transmitter has the right to the air or is that just a bit too liberal?

    --
    -- From Denmark
  112. Heh by glowingspleen · · Score: 1

    Thanks. But I was using sarcasm to convey that point, Mr. Master of the Obvious.

  113. They're already sort of doing this in the US by blazer1024 · · Score: 4

    Here in New Mexico, a company called LoboNet uses 2.4GHz LAN/WAN radios from BreezeCOM with outdoor antennas to businesses in the more rural areas. (Near Albuquerque and Santa Fe, but too far for DSL or ISDN)

    They have around a dozen customers, and there's no problem with the FCC, since the 2.4GHz spectrum is an non-license spectrum. As far as power levels go, I don't know. But it works quite nicely.

    (Although for some reason LoboNet doesn't have any mention of it on their site... strange. But I know it's there! Maybe there's some mention at the Integrity Networking Solutions site, since many of the wireless networking customers go through them.)