Better soilder, better driver, better quarterback, completely different jobs that use the same visual skills. The mentally disturbed are going to find and outlet & a reason, regardless of what we do or don't ban.
Well that's why the studies were done by scientists and not idiots spouting off on/.
btw....If you are completely without a clue, said studies proved that heavy gamers have increased spatial reasoning abilities. I.e. while one person can only track so many moving objects at one time, the gamer can track *up to* 50% more. This is good for both jet pilots & RADAR operators.
As for references, it was just in the news (and I believe Nature) last week, Google's your friend.
Yeah, that's why we are seeing "professionals" getting indictied left & right over here. 50 years ago there was honesty in professionalism, now it's been replaced by greed...
Through phrases like "misusing and misappropriating SCO's proprietary software", and through the enumeration of five categories of rights in paragraph 68, SCO's complaint implies the existence of relevant SCO intellectual-property rights based on patent, copyright, trade-secret, and trademark law as a background to the explicit matter of its licensing dispute with IBM over Linux.
It is notable that the complaint does so without ever actually stating what those claims are. We have previously observed that the outcome of the USL/Novell-vs.-BSD lawsuit places the very existence of such rights in serious doubt. But there are other reasons for SCO's coyness which should not escape notice.
One is that, despite misleading claims implied on SCO's web pages by phrases like "exclusive licensing", SCO does not own or control the Unix trademark. As we have previously observed, that trademark -- and the privilege of suing IBM for relief on a trademark-violation theory -- belongs to The Open Group.
Furthermore, SCO is barred by the terms of the GNU General Public License from making copyright or patent-infringement claims on any technology shipped in conjunction with the Linux kernel that SCO/Caldera itself has been selling for the last eight years. Therefore, SCO may accuse IBM of misappropriating SCO-owned software to improve the Linux kernel only if that software does not actually ship with the Linux kernel it is alleged to be improving!
Finally, SCO is barred from making trade-secret claims on the contents of the Linux kernel, not merely by the fact that the kernel source is generally available, but by the fact that SCO has made the sources of its Linux kernel available for download from SCO's own website! [25].
SCO, as a matter of fact and law, clearly does retain proprietary rights with respect to the SCO OpenServer binary distribution (which has never been published in source-code form and is not under the GPL). It is not the purpose of this position paper to dispute those rights. But to the extent that SCO uses those proprietary rights to attempt to cast a shadow over Linux, it maintains a position which is factually untenable.
Indeed, the effect of SCO's complaint is to systematically mislead and obfuscate on the issue of what background rights SCO actually has at issue in its claim of tort and license violations. The clear intent is to deceive observers into believing that SCO has a licit claim.
But that emperor has no clothes. Ultimately, SCO's argument would appear to boil down to asserting that "IBM had no right to give the community technologies that SCO had made freely available on its download site."
SARS is a regular virus that has mutated due to certian countries habits for housing different kinds of livestock together in the same unsanitary pens for extened periods of time? This would allow the virus many many more chances than it would normally have for cross-species mutation. Over a long enough time frame (oh 2000 years or so I guess) I guess anything is possible...
Plaintiff, EMARKETERSAMERICA.ORG, INC. hereby makes a demand for a jury trial of all counts so triable.
Sweet, these morons *want* a jury trial.
Jury: "Your honor, we find the defendant SpamHaus et al. innocent on all charges, and furthermore recommend the public castration and/or execution of the plantiff & all it's members.
U.S.P.O. was privatized a few years back, and they've been raising the price of postage stamps ever since. That being said, they still do a pretty damn job a such a enormous task.
Sweet...
It's better than AC fuckwad....
Better soilder, better driver, better quarterback, completely different jobs that use the same visual skills. The mentally disturbed are going to find and outlet & a reason, regardless of what we do or don't ban.
Jaysyn
Well that's why the studies were done by scientists and not idiots spouting off on /.
btw....If you are completely without a clue, said studies proved that heavy gamers have increased spatial reasoning abilities. I.e. while one person can only track so many moving objects at one time, the gamer can track *up to* 50% more. This is good for both jet pilots & RADAR operators.
As for references, it was just in the news (and I believe Nature) last week, Google's your friend.
Jaysyn
The one around the throat?
(yes, that's the point...)
Jaysyn
s/large/small
s/unemployed/idle rich
Jaysyn
I fucking love that song....
Jaysyn
Yeah, that's why we are seeing "professionals" getting indictied left & right over here. 50 years ago there was honesty in professionalism, now it's been replaced by greed...
Jaysyn
Justin is an officer at nullsoft. I.e. he's the CEO.
Jaysyn
I use Winamp2 because I can't get Ryan Giess' plugins to work with Winamp3.
Jaysyn
It depends if you are in a right-to-work state or not. Non-Competes in California & Florida are pretty much a joke...
Jaysyn
Can't we do a little better than that?
Jaysyn
Oddly enough I see more Europeans on Trepia right now than anything else, 1 other Floridian, and a bunch of people on the other side of the country.
Jaysyn
Microsoft researchers are suggesting that clusters of Linux PCs are used? Are they now Ex-Microsoft researchers?
Jaysyn
Fuck it we'll nuke the moon then!
Oh, wait...
Jaysyn
Umm, no sounds more like cocaine and/or alcohol.
Jaysyn
You mean Heyward's Handy Haversack, right?
Jaysyn
From the OSI position paper:
Through phrases like "misusing and misappropriating SCO's proprietary software", and through the enumeration of five categories of rights in paragraph 68, SCO's complaint implies the existence of relevant SCO intellectual-property rights based on patent, copyright, trade-secret, and trademark law as a background to the explicit matter of its licensing dispute with IBM over Linux.
It is notable that the complaint does so without ever actually stating what those claims are. We have previously observed that the outcome of the USL/Novell-vs.-BSD lawsuit places the very existence of such rights in serious doubt. But there are other reasons for SCO's coyness which should not escape notice.
One is that, despite misleading claims implied on SCO's web pages by phrases like "exclusive licensing", SCO does not own or control the Unix trademark. As we have previously observed, that trademark -- and the privilege of suing IBM for relief on a trademark-violation theory -- belongs to The Open Group.
Furthermore, SCO is barred by the terms of the GNU General Public License from making copyright or patent-infringement claims on any technology shipped in conjunction with the Linux kernel that SCO/Caldera itself has been selling for the last eight years. Therefore, SCO may accuse IBM of misappropriating SCO-owned software to improve the Linux kernel only if that software does not actually ship with the Linux kernel it is alleged to be improving!
Finally, SCO is barred from making trade-secret claims on the contents of the Linux kernel, not merely by the fact that the kernel source is generally available, but by the fact that SCO has made the sources of its Linux kernel available for download from SCO's own website! [25].
SCO, as a matter of fact and law, clearly does retain proprietary rights with respect to the SCO OpenServer binary distribution (which has never been published in source-code form and is not under the GPL). It is not the purpose of this position paper to dispute those rights. But to the extent that SCO uses those proprietary rights to attempt to cast a shadow over Linux, it maintains a position which is factually untenable.
Indeed, the effect of SCO's complaint is to systematically mislead and obfuscate on the issue of what background rights SCO actually has at issue in its claim of tort and license violations. The clear intent is to deceive observers into believing that SCO has a licit claim.
But that emperor has no clothes. Ultimately, SCO's argument would appear to boil down to asserting that "IBM had no right to give the community technologies that SCO had made freely available on its download site."
Jaysyn
SARS is a regular virus that has mutated due to certian countries habits for housing different kinds of livestock together in the same unsanitary pens for extened periods of time? This would allow the virus many many more chances than it would normally have for cross-species mutation. Over a long enough time frame (oh 2000 years or so I guess) I guess anything is possible...
Just a wild guess.
Jaysyn
Yeah, I realized right as I hit the submit button....
Oops
Jaysyn
Heh, I've got 4 + a wheel. 14 buttons if you count my Claw (www.claw.com.au).
Jaysyn
Bullshit, I downloaded a new bugfix for it yesterday afternoon.
For the record I use Phoenix/Firebird, Windows Update just alerts me to when IE needs fixing....
Jaysyn
Matt Murdock, is that you?
Jaysyn
Demand for Jury Trial
Plaintiff, EMARKETERSAMERICA.ORG, INC. hereby makes a demand for a jury trial of all counts so triable.
Sweet, these morons *want* a jury trial.
Jury: "Your honor, we find the defendant SpamHaus et al. innocent on all charges, and furthermore recommend the public castration and/or execution of the plantiff & all it's members.
Judge: "Sounds good to me."
Jaysyn
U.S.P.O. was privatized a few years back, and they've been raising the price of postage stamps ever since. That being said, they still do a pretty damn job a such a enormous task.
Jaysyn