Heh. I remember whipping up a summary of that during my degree, a decade ago. Even then, it was viewed as historical research - I had to go down to the stacks!
I don't think that counts: a) it wasn't your mistake; and b) the company should never had had that revenue in the first place, so it wasn't a "loss" but a restitution.
Even more so since HSAs are now the equivalent of health-oriented RRSPs in the USA. Man, that could have been golden. Of course it's just parked now because nobody wants to pay.
They could have been running the code for it on their server, doing a (perhaps asynchronous) request for the CAPTCHA image and that had been set up to use a direct IP address (or domain linking to one).
The connection strings for AJAX requests and the like are often forgotten when handling domain-related issues/HTTPS/etc., so I'm not at all surprised.
Many disagree with you as to whether these things are or should be rights. Some believe that people should be left to starve or freeze to death if they are unwilling or unable to work. (This viewpoint is not uniquely American.)
Deriding people who hold such views for their lack of compassion is non-productive. To win them over, it may be more effective to show how helping the poor benefits them - if indeed it does. For example, public health care benefits everyone who has direct or indirect contact with the public - even the rich - through the prevention of epidemics.
In the Simpsons, the local school puts on a play ("The Nice Man Giveth") to show Mr Burns the personal value of education, when poorly-educated students accidentally serve him rat poison, can't read a map to drive him to hospital, and fail to operate correctly on him. While it does not work in that particular instance, perhaps those who seek funding from the public could do a better job of explaining why the public should care.
The point is that it's obvious that he's the stronger player, and the world needs a better system than a single championship once every three years to prove it.
. . . especially when the needs vary with each site.
I run Flayrah (a furry news/features site) and implemented a comment moderation system based on weighted ratings and user karma across comments and posts that fades and folds comments as their rating decreases. It works pretty well for us, but it took a lot of time to balance, as well as technical expertise which most site-runners don't have.
Sometimes people complain about the "rule of the majority", but in practice they tend to do quite well. The alternative was more heavy-handed moderation by selected moderators, who have their own biases.
It's best to mix up your adjectives a bit. If you have someone "note" everything, it gets boring rather quickly. If you get stuck, "said' or "wrote" are good options.
Slashdot Mirror
That's potentially a problem, but probably not the problem.
Perhaps not, but there is apparently a significant amount of overground cabling in London, which is why they're making a tunnel to replace it.
I learnt that just yesterday! It's called nominalization.
Are you using VirtualBox 5? They added support for a bunch of instructions.
Heh. I remember whipping up a summary of that during my degree, a decade ago. Even then, it was viewed as historical research - I had to go down to the stacks!
I'm sure Facebook will claims the use of the term "Face" infringes their trademark.
I don't think that counts: a) it wasn't your mistake; and b) the company should never had had that revenue in the first place, so it wasn't a "loss" but a restitution.
Even more so since HSAs are now the equivalent of health-oriented RRSPs in the USA. Man, that could have been golden. Of course it's just parked now because nobody wants to pay.
They could have been running the code for it on their server, doing a (perhaps asynchronous) request for the CAPTCHA image and that had been set up to use a direct IP address (or domain linking to one). The connection strings for AJAX requests and the like are often forgotten when handling domain-related issues/HTTPS/etc., so I'm not at all surprised.
Here's a Google cache, including the diagram: http://webcache.googleusercont...
But "Ask Slashdot" is all about pointing out your superiority to others. Why not the OP?
Many disagree with you as to whether these things are or should be rights. Some believe that people should be left to starve or freeze to death if they are unwilling or unable to work. (This viewpoint is not uniquely American.)
Deriding people who hold such views for their lack of compassion is non-productive. To win them over, it may be more effective to show how helping the poor benefits them - if indeed it does. For example, public health care benefits everyone who has direct or indirect contact with the public - even the rich - through the prevention of epidemics.
In the Simpsons, the local school puts on a play ("The Nice Man Giveth") to show Mr Burns the personal value of education, when poorly-educated students accidentally serve him rat poison, can't read a map to drive him to hospital, and fail to operate correctly on him. While it does not work in that particular instance, perhaps those who seek funding from the public could do a better job of explaining why the public should care.
If he liked it so much, he can always pay for the programmers to support it. He's a free man now, sort of!
This is where you take your mother to court for abuse and file a petition of emancipation. Good luck weaselling out of contract terms then.
The point is that it's obvious that he's the stronger player, and the world needs a better system than a single championship once every three years to prove it.
Besides, chess has always been played in Eurasia.
Because in Oceania it rains all the time and Eastasia prefers Go.
The author of the bzip2 decompression code seems to have gotten a little bored writing the comments.
. . . especially when the needs vary with each site. I run Flayrah (a furry news/features site) and implemented a comment moderation system based on weighted ratings and user karma across comments and posts that fades and folds comments as their rating decreases. It works pretty well for us, but it took a lot of time to balance, as well as technical expertise which most site-runners don't have. Sometimes people complain about the "rule of the majority", but in practice they tend to do quite well. The alternative was more heavy-handed moderation by selected moderators, who have their own biases.
It's best to mix up your adjectives a bit. If you have someone "note" everything, it gets boring rather quickly. If you get stuck, "said' or "wrote" are good options.
If wishes were mod-points, we'd all be +5.
The poster made a comment in the second bug saying that they hoped to get a faster response than on the MySQL bug.
One of them is black. RTFA!
You can't take a gift back; but if you don't get a product or service you purchased, that's a different matter.
You can also right-click on the tab bar, it's an option there.