Over-reliance on the autopilot is driving without due care and attention, whether the autopilot causes a crash or not. This driver was not relying on the autopilot but using one of its features to enhance his care and attention.
Actually, it describes
- Cours d'eau de montagne, rapide et irrégulier, de faible longueur, plus ou moins à sec entre des crues violentes et brusques.
- Liquide qui coule en abondance : Des torrents de larmes.
- Abondance de quelque chose qui semble se répandre : Un torrent de lumière. Un torrent d'injures (http://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/torrent/78539)
Because Torrent just happens to also be a French word. It wouldn't have been a valid reason in Spain (which however doesn't exclude other valid reasons).
A fact is neither truth nor lie. It just is. A statement of fact on the other hand can be as true or false as any other statement. That there are trees is a fact. "There are trees" as a statement of fact is the truth. "There are no trees" as a statement of fact is a lie.
Or how about there were plenty of gays/bis in Entreprise but since their sexuality was not the least bit relevant to the plot, there is no way of knowing who they were. One thing they did do was to invent a third sex it the Progenitor and to have an openly polygamous/polyandrous species in the Denobulans, whose everyday sexual alignment seemed a bit versatile.
The countries I've lived in since 1986 never got past TOS. So six months ago or so I decided to put that right and watched large slices of TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT in that order. I saw well over half the episodes of all of incarnations except DS9, which I abandoned in disgust after the Dominion War deus-ex-machina. None of my judgements are therefore the result of memories clouded by time.
I found TNG very, very weak (and the theme music extremely irritating). DS9 was boring with very poor plots and a dreadful lead actor who spoke like he was reading from a script given to him one word at a time. VOY recovered from a truly terrible first two or three seasons but never quite overcame the bad acting of Chakotay, Paris, Neelix, Kim, and the characterization of the captain (not Kate Mulgrew’s fault). Enterprise on the other hand boldly explored issues where no (or very few) Star Treks had gone before. I don't think I skipped a single episode.
If I had to do it all over again I'd just watch ENT and TOS and leave it there (except maybe watch Trials and Tribble-ations at the end).
When the advertising hoardings say "Vote Labour" or "Vote Conservative" and plaster the statesmanlike face of their leader-du-jour all over the place, there can be little doubt we are being expected by the powers-that-be to vote for a Prime Minister, despite what we are technically doing.
When a referendum is advisory it tells the government how much of a popular current there is one way or the other. The government, being responsible, must then judge whether that current is strong enough to enact an irreversible change that goes well beyond the scope of most other government decisions. Is 51.9% really enough for that? Will there be a parliamentary debate to decide whether it is or not?
The petition says you must be a UK citizen or resident to vote. It ask you for your name. It asks what country you live in and your postcode. And it asks for your e-mail address. You then have to click the link in the e-mail they send. For example I'm a UK citizen and I currently live in Spain after spending many years in France. There are many expats who have invested their life in EU countries, because you know, European Union right? They are now having the rug pulled from under their feet. And they did not get the chance to vote. The people most directly affected didn't get a vote.
"They don't want you to see the awful trade deals that favour them but force you to compete on wages and conditions with people in the developing world."
To be fair to the leave camp, Michael Gove did say Britain could emulate Albania.
You could have stopped at "Nobody says 2x more". For 2x they say twice as much/many. Although plenty of people do say things like "two times cheaper" (which as you indirectly point out is just plain wrong).
His argument is flawed because it just passes the buck. Does the superior civilization who is running the simulation deduce that it too must be in one by the same reasoning?
I've never seen as many straw men in one place in all my life as there are in this article. Nobody has said anything about not allowing foreign products in. They are already selling as many iphones as they want. Just not in Apple stores.
I think we already have ultrasonic for that. So by the same token subsonic shoud be infrasonic. There again we do have infrastructure and superstructure.
Slashdot Mirror
From my experience, every update removes useful power user features.
Over-reliance on the autopilot is driving without due care and attention, whether the autopilot causes a crash or not.
This driver was not relying on the autopilot but using one of its features to enhance his care and attention.
Ah yes Catalan, Gallego... I stand corrected; although I'm sure the point wasn't missed.
Actually, it describes
- Cours d'eau de montagne, rapide et irrégulier, de faible longueur, plus ou moins à sec entre des crues violentes et brusques.
- Liquide qui coule en abondance : Des torrents de larmes.
- Abondance de quelque chose qui semble se répandre : Un torrent de lumière. Un torrent d'injures (http://www.larousse.fr/dictionnaires/francais/torrent/78539)
Because Torrent just happens to also be a French word. It wouldn't have been a valid reason in Spain (which however doesn't exclude other valid reasons).
And how about this—is this ambiguous?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/con...
Replying to myself here - I just realized I have repeated more or less exactly what AC #52502523 said.
A fact is neither truth nor lie. It just is. A statement of fact on the other hand can be as true or false as any other statement.
That there are trees is a fact.
"There are trees" as a statement of fact is the truth.
"There are no trees" as a statement of fact is a lie.
You see his parents though, and there's no doubt about it. However, I believe KHAN was Punjabi or Sikh?
Whatever their ancestry, Bashir’s parents and Bashir himself are explicitly English in the same way Sisko is explicitly American.
Or how about there were plenty of gays/bis in Entreprise but since their sexuality was not the least bit relevant to the plot, there is no way of knowing who they were.
One thing they did do was to invent a third sex it the Progenitor and to have an openly polygamous/polyandrous species in the Denobulans, whose everyday sexual alignment seemed a bit versatile.
I'm a big fan of Uhura and Nichelle Nichols but to suggest her job was anything other than an interstellar switchboard operator is misleading.
The countries I've lived in since 1986 never got past TOS. So six months ago or so I decided to put that right and watched large slices of TNG, DS9, VOY, and ENT in that order. I saw well over half the episodes of all of incarnations except DS9, which I abandoned in disgust after the Dominion War deus-ex-machina.
None of my judgements are therefore the result of memories clouded by time.
I found TNG very, very weak (and the theme music extremely irritating).
DS9 was boring with very poor plots and a dreadful lead actor who spoke like he was reading from a script given to him one word at a time.
VOY recovered from a truly terrible first two or three seasons but never quite overcame the bad acting of Chakotay, Paris, Neelix, Kim, and the characterization of the captain (not Kate Mulgrew’s fault).
Enterprise on the other hand boldly explored issues where no (or very few) Star Treks had gone before. I don't think I skipped a single episode.
If I had to do it all over again I'd just watch ENT and TOS and leave it there (except maybe watch Trials and Tribble-ations at the end).
When the advertising hoardings say "Vote Labour" or "Vote Conservative" and plaster the statesmanlike face of their leader-du-jour all over the place, there can be little doubt we are being expected by the powers-that-be to vote for a Prime Minister, despite what we are technically doing.
When a referendum is advisory it tells the government how much of a popular current there is one way or the other. The government, being responsible, must then judge whether that current is strong enough to enact an irreversible change that goes well beyond the scope of most other government decisions. Is 51.9% really enough for that? Will there be a parliamentary debate to decide whether it is or not?
The petition says you must be a UK citizen or resident to vote. It ask you for your name. It asks what country you live in and your postcode. And it asks for your e-mail address. You then have to click the link in the e-mail they send.
For example I'm a UK citizen and I currently live in Spain after spending many years in France.
There are many expats who have invested their life in EU countries, because you know, European Union right? They are now having the rug pulled from under their feet. And they did not get the chance to vote. The people most directly affected didn't get a vote.
"They don't want you to see the awful trade deals that favour them but force you to compete on wages and conditions with people in the developing world."
To be fair to the leave camp, Michael Gove did say Britain could emulate Albania.
You could have stopped at "Nobody says 2x more".
For 2x they say twice as much/many.
Although plenty of people do say things like "two times cheaper" (which as you indirectly point out is just plain wrong).
I didn't see what you did there.
His argument is flawed because it just passes the buck.
Does the superior civilization who is running the simulation deduce that it too must be in one by the same reasoning?
Decimating is knocking 1/10 off, not dividing by 10.
So how are all the other stores already selling Apple stuff getting by?
I've never seen as many straw men in one place in all my life as there are in this article.
Nobody has said anything about not allowing foreign products in. They are already selling as many iphones as they want. Just not in Apple stores.
So allowing a shop to sell 70% of imported goods can be considered as not wanting imported goods. Right.
I think we already have ultrasonic for that. So by the same token subsonic shoud be infrasonic. There again we do have infrastructure and superstructure.
I give in.
While I can't speak to the sophistication of ISIS IT departments.
I think it's safe to imagine they're not dunces and know what "routing around" means, including its most broadest of meanings.
Since when was it possible for 156 million mostly penniless people to move elsewhere?