Solaris, HP/UX and BSD have shared ancestry. It's possible (though improbable) that some horrible underlying problem is shared between them. Hell even Linux has shares the same ideas. Better use Windows, at least that is an independent development.
Yes, but few vulnerabilities are kernel related. Most are in user level code, and "ubuntu on everything" is in fact creating a monoculture, not increasing the alternatives.
not here in a technical "it's available and there's a usergroup of five people" sense like plan 9 is)
Five people! Five people! Some of dream of having five people. I'm working on a project that is 20-30 years old and has as far as I can tell two users.
AIX PS/2 (and AIX/370) wasn't the same OS as AIX on RS/6000, It was a port of LOCUS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOCUS_(operating_system) with an el-cheapo AIX compatibility layer. (That's how come AIX PS/2 had the TCF clustering software but AIX on RS/6000 didn't).
If the genocide in Sudan succeeds in killing all blacks there, the AFP will personally go down and congratulate the sudanese government on a jihad well done
Just exactly what "color" do you think the Sudanese government are?
If you want to consider China an enemy, and think "Aid and Comfort" is enough to convict for treason then you'd better start by locking up the board of Wal-Mart. Then have a look at the contents of your house and wardrobe and decide whether to turn yourself in.
Citation needed? He's said that the BSD license doesn't do all the things he wants the GPL to do, but you do know that the BSD license is recognised as a free software license by the FSF, don't you?
Modified BSD license
This is the original BSD license, modified by removal of the advertising clause. It is a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license, compatible with the GNU GPL.
If you want a simple, permissive non-copyleft free software license, the modified BSD license is a reasonable choice. However, it is risky to recommend use of "the BSD license", because confusion could easily occur and lead to use of the flawed original BSD license. To avoid this risk, you can suggest the X11 license instead. The X11 license and the revised BSD license are more or less equivalent.
This license is sometimes referred to as the 3-clause BSD license.
Slashdot Mirror
Ah, the old "the beatings will continue until morale improves" idea. You get that a lot in dying companies/industries.
Solaris, HP/UX and BSD have shared ancestry. It's possible (though improbable) that some horrible underlying problem is shared between them. Hell even Linux has shares the same ideas. Better use Windows, at least that is an independent development.
Yes, but few vulnerabilities are kernel related. Most are in user level code, and "ubuntu on everything" is in fact creating a monoculture, not increasing the alternatives.
However in this case their actual views, rather than this absurd parody, are probably right.
Five people! Five people! Some of dream of having five people. I'm working on a project that is 20-30 years old and has as far as I can tell two users.
So you got them from Ubuntu.
I wonder where Ubuntu got them?
For a laugh try asking an arab.
By the way, the people of Sudan, whether "black" or "arab" are all Africans.
Who happen to be (if you look at them) black.
AIX PS/2 (and AIX/370) wasn't the same OS as AIX on RS/6000, It was a port of LOCUS http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOCUS_(operating_system) with an el-cheapo AIX compatibility layer. (That's how come AIX PS/2 had the TCF clustering software but AIX on RS/6000 didn't).
A wonderful example of what happens when you try to use logic to argue from false premises.
Why do you keep saying AFP when you mean AP? Do you have some problem with the French?
Damn, you're so dumb you don't know that AP is not the same as AFP and I'm so nice I didn't even notice.
Just exactly what "color" do you think the Sudanese government are?
Well of course. Forgive me for overestimating the intelligence of my audience.
Don't worry about it. When I was a kid Japan was known for making shoddy knock-offs of "Western" goods.
Before my time the US was known for making shoddy knock-offs of European goods.
You don't use liquid hydrogen in ICBM's.
If you want to consider China an enemy, and think "Aid and Comfort" is enough to convict for treason then you'd better start by locking up the board of Wal-Mart. Then have a look at the contents of your house and wardrobe and decide whether to turn yourself in.
Because they'd lose money?
Are you asking if your plan would be breaking the law, or whether you would get away with it? It's not the same question.
Citation needed? He's said that the BSD license doesn't do all the things he wants the GPL to do, but you do know that the BSD license is recognised as a free software license by the FSF, don't you?
(From http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/index_html#GPLCompatibleLicenses).
I see no tirade.
Try it with a book. See if you get sued by the author.
GPL code is copyrighted. Only by accepting the GPL do you have the right to copy the code.
Compile it. Distribute it. Get sued. Discover you're wrong. HTH. HAND.
Or because administrater doesn't have permission. Under windows it doesn't necessarily. It does have permission to change the permissions though.
Fuck.