Slashdot Mirror


AVG Virus Scanner Removes Critical Windows File

secmartin writes "The popular virus scanner AVG released an update yesterday that caused their software to mark user32.dll as a virus. Since this is a rather critical file, AVG's suggestion to remove it caused problems for users around the world who are now advised to restore the file through the Windows Recovery Console. AVG just posted an update about this (FAQ item 1574) in the support section of their site. Their forums are full of complaints."

440 comments

  1. Well... by jav1231 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just doing it's job!

    1. Re:Well... by zappepcs · · Score: 4, Funny

      When I read it, I thought the title was "AVG Virus Scanner Removes Critical Windows Flaw" ...
      That would have been excellent sales technique. shame the reality is so very different.

    2. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just doing it's job!

      From its soapbox, AVG also instructed users to pack their computers back up and mail them back to the retailer.

    3. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This isn't too far from realistic.

      I work for a firm that, through the power of politics, actually pays to use McAfee antivirus and related products. Now, this is a product that can sometimes detect a virus but can't remove it, whatsoever. Yet, it will produce an error message that prompts the end-user to "delete", "remove" or "ignore"... (something to this nature - it really doesn't matter since none of them work except "ignore").

      Some of the technicians have resorted to using certain free applications to get rid of the viruses (virii?) when the end-users show up to the help desk, angry as all get. Recently, McAfee started preventing these various freeware packages from being installed - it simply detects them as viruses themselves!

      You could say that McAfee is doing its job - it leaves the sales up to the politicians while it prevents the real software from doing the work.

      What a hopeless, hopeless situation.

    4. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      shame the reality is so very different.

      It is?

    5. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Shouldn't it have deleted *all* the windows files? Windoze is nothing but a bloated virus, after all!

    6. Re:Well... by BronsCon · · Score: 5, Funny

      It removes the biggest flaw of all: user.

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    7. Re:Well... by Tubal-Cain · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Recently, McAfee started preventing these various freeware packages from being installed - it simply detects them as viruses themselves!

      This is probably why antiviruses warn you not to have a second antivrus installed simultaneously.

    8. Re:Well... by steelfood · · Score: 5, Funny

      "AVG Virus Scanner Removes Critical Windows Flaw"

      There's a redundancy in there somewhere. I can't quite put my finger on it.

      --
      "If a nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be."
    9. Re:Well... by Trogre · · Score: 2, Funny

      When I read it on the /. front page, there was a Samsung ad covering part of it due to some rather poor CSS. As a result the headline read,

      "AVG Visus Scanner Removes Critical Windows".

      That is all.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    10. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      twitter, is that you?

    11. Re:Well... by DigitAl56K · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Although this has a funny side, the impact of anti-virus software these days can be quite nasty. I'm personally an advocate of anti-virus software for the vast majority of people out there who are not specialists in computer security and really don't have much reason to keep track of all the latest exploits (technical or people-based). Good anti-virus software strikes an appropriate balance between a low impact on user experience and providing a reasonable level of protection.

      However, count yourself lucky if you don't end up on the wrong end of today's anti-virus products. Here we have a story about one product warning users about an essential file for their OS and warning them to remove it. I've seen similar problems with other legitimate software on my system and my vendor doesn't provide any clear way of submitting a file for analysis to have their defintions corrected unless I take action in the software to quarantine it first, which obviously, knowing the file is fine, I don't want to do.

      I also work at a company that distributes software to millions of people every month. It is rare that we can go more than a couple of months these days without some anti-virus package telling users that some component of our software or installers contains a virus, which is completely untrue. And when this happens there is no solution to the problem. I have spent hours on the phone trying to reach several different vendors on behalf of our users before trying to get them to fix their products. It's usually impossible to get through to anyone who can actually help. You can submit a file for analysis to have it verified as clean and hope that the vendor will correct their definitions. This can take 24-48 hours, meanwhile hundreds of thousands of your customers are being falsely informed that there is a virus in your product. And no matter your reputation people tend to lose trust when there is a big red box on their screen warning them about viruses.

      After dealing with this time and time again I've come to the conclusion that it's simply best to wait for end-users themselves to complain in enough volume to their AV vendors to have these problems corrected. Certainly I have never found any other solution that works faster. And still, the same vendor may falsely flag the same software just months later. You can't even QA against every anti-virus package out there, some packages update their definitions every three hours, so you can only ever know if you'll flag an AV detection at the instant of testing and even if you do know you're getting flagged you have the same problem - no way to resolve the issue with the vendor.

      Imagine the consequences to a person who kept falsely telling millions of people your product would infect their computers. It would surely be grounds for libel.

      Again, I believe that AV software can be both useful and valuable. But the AV industry itself is a menace and vendors are often unaccountable for their actions.

    12. Re:Well... by ChameleonDave · · Score: 4, Informative

      viruses (virii?)

      No.

    13. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IINI: it's is not its

    14. Re:Well... by antdude · · Score: 1, Informative

      it's = it is

      Yep, I am being a Grammar Nazi.

      --
      Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
    15. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      )get rid of the viruses (virii?)

      Viruses is the correct plural. Virii only makes you look like a pretentious fuckwit and is piss-poor Latin grammar.

      http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html

      Now write it out 100 times. If it's not done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off.

    16. Re:Well... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 2, Funny

      Virii is a good way to catch pendants though.

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    17. Re:Well... by Opportunist · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Is it anywhere in the business any different?

      When are you liable for what your software does? I can't really think of a single, even anecdotical, incident where a software company could have been held liable for whatever their product barfed. Databases that lose and leak information, software that miraculously fails at the most inappropriate of times, countless hours of productivity wasted because some piece of software didn't perform what it was meant to do.

      What software company has ever been held liable for its crappy software?

      False alarms are common. Much more common than AV vendors want to admit and heaps more common than the average person ever notices. I've had my time with an AV company. False positives were part of the daily routine. I'm by no means exaggerating. Finding an MS system file should be impossible due to whitelist tests, which are pretty much a standard for AV companies. But the danger remains that an update from MS collides with an update for the AV kit, which can result in what happened to AVG here.

      If some AV company keeps identifying you as malware, get into contact with them and provide them with samples to whitelist. AV vendors are usually quite approachable when offered a way to avoid false detections without having to rework their scanner to something that doesn't just match patterns...

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    18. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      It removes the biggest flaw of all: user.

      No, unfortunately, the user won't be removed until the Skynet update is released.

    19. Re:Well... by omeomi · · Score: 2, Funny

      pendants

      (pedants?)

      Sorry, I couldn't resist...

    20. Re:Well... by Hal_Porter · · Score: 1

      pendants

      (pedants?)

      Sorry, I couldn't resist...

      Muahaha. I know!

      --
      echo -e 'global _start\n _start:\n mov eax, 2\n int 80h\n jmp _start' > a.asm; nasm a.asm -f elf; ld a.o -o a;
    21. Re:Well... by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 4

      The CSS converts the "r" in Virus to an "s" as well as truncating the end of the sentence? That is some poor CSS.

    22. Re:Well... by Atario · · Score: 1

      Clearly. "Virii" would be from "virius". It's "viri".

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    23. Re:Well... by Ihmhi · · Score: 5, Interesting

      AVG recently detected the OpenOffice 3.0 installer as a trojan.

      It also did the same with keyfinder, a program that discovers the serial for Windows XP after it's been installed. (How I miss the days of just looking in the registry...) I have a lot of customers who lose their serials (and sometimes even their CDs), and I get a bit annoyed when it gets erased off of my flash drive every time I plug in it.

      Thankfully I can restore it back to its original location, but it's a hassle.

    24. Re:Well... by boogerme0 · · Score: 0, Troll

      But it's not "viruses."

    25. Re:Well... by syousef · · Score: 5, Funny

      Just doing it's job!

      At 16:42:34 AVG achieved sentience and decided that the user(32.dll) was the problem.

      --
      These posts express my own personal views, not those of my employer
    26. Re:Well... by Opyros · · Score: 5, Informative

      Arguably, it should just be "viruses". Not all Latin words retain Latinate plurals in English (e.g. "circus/circuses"), and not all Latin words ending in -us had plurals ending in -i. See this excerpt from the alt.usage.english FAQ for more. </pedantry>

    27. Re:Well... by Zencyde · · Score: 1

      Dude. Don't you know that CSS suxxx?

      --
      What day is it? Could you please tell me?
    28. Re:Well... by UncleTogie · · Score: 4, Funny

      Virii is a good way to catch pendants though.

      So THAT'S where my +2 Amulet of Snarkiness went....!

      --
      Don't tell me to get a life. I'm a gamer; I have LOTS of lives!
    29. Re:Well... by ikkonoishi · · Score: 1

      You would have a point if AVG was an acronym, but it is actually the product's name now.

    30. Re:Well... by jacquems · · Score: 1

      This just proves what people have been saying all along: Windows really IS a virus with mouse support.

    31. Re:Well... by Evanisincontrol · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Whoosh!

    32. Re:Well... by g-san · · Score: 1

      Redundancy. I don't think this word means what you think.

      Try: Circular Reference. ;)

    33. Re:Well... by g-san · · Score: 1

      Just make sure to wash your Virii before placing it around your neck.

    34. Re:Well... by janrinok · · Score: 1

      ...and another whoosh.

      --
      Have a look at soylentnews.org for a different view
    35. Re:Well... by g-san · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Now, this is a product that can sometimes detect a virus but can't remove it, whatsoever.

      Ah yes... Windows. The only system where I can be logged in as the super user only to be told I can't delete a file. Access Denied. I always feel like Windows reserves the higher system privileges for people attacking your system, or malicious software already running on your system. /sigh

    36. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that is not so unusual, many AV software is incompatible with other AV. besides, they might seem as virus to heuristics.

    37. Re:Well... by boredhacker · · Score: 1

      I can't really think of a single, even anecdotal, incident where a software company could have been held liable for whatever their product barfed.

      You can't hold someone liable for any kind of wrong doing after explicitly waiving your right to do so by agreeing to their EULA.

      You want to hold a developer responsible... no problem, just don't expect to buy their software for $199 off the rack.

    38. Re:Well... by wiz_80 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Windows assumes all users are idiots, including and especially Administrator.

      Whether this is an accurate or correct assumption is left as an exercise for the reader.

      Unix-style OSen, OTOH, are quite happy to let you shoot off your own foot, ankle, shin, knee, and indeed any body part you care to name, and supply an endless variety of interesting weapons and weaponizable tools to enable you to do so.

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    39. Re:Well... by Trogre · · Score: 1

      No, the 'r' to 's' conversion was quite possibly the result of too much coffee this morning.

      The truncating the end of the sentence? Totally bad CSS.

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
    40. Re:Well... by DigitAl56K · · Score: 1

      When are you liable for what your software does? I can't really think of a single, even anecdotical, incident where a software company could have been held liable for whatever their product barfed.

      Sure, but most products, even completely broken ones, don't go around calling other peoples products malware :)

      If some AV company keeps identifying you as malware, get into contact with them and provide them with samples to whitelist.

      On this point, you'd think that MS would make it easier on the AV's in order to prevent this kind of thing by digitally signing their libraries but I just found that user32.dll is not digitally signed. As far as getting in touch with two-dozen AV vendors any time you update any one of your libraries: yeah, right! IMHO all vendors should be required to provide a means of contact dedicated to parties suffering false positives and there should be an industry standard response time for addressing such problems. If you're going to create/distribute/sell software that potentially alerts against and disables other vendors products the onus is on you to provide reasonable remediation.

    41. Re:Well... by Pikoro · · Score: 4, Funny

      Pendii?

      --
      "Freedom in the USA is not the ability to do what you want. It is the ability to stop others from doing what THEY want"
    42. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      most antivirus software is behaving like viruses - it's putting its parts deep into system, scanning and sometimes changing or removing files, etc.

      So yes, McAfee is doing its job

    43. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      oh, noes! not again! every time there is a virus somewhere in the article or in a comment starts this useless thread! And we complain about article dupes... Could we please settle this thing once and for all?

    44. Re:Well... by vain+gloria · · Score: 1

      Same with the PyGame docs installation exe. AVG mistakenly flagged it a few days ago. No major problem obviously, but a needless irritation nonetheless.

    45. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybes the answer is not to run Windows? There are dozens of mature unix-style operating systems that do everything but high-end gaming. gOS and OSX are good choices.

    46. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can't really think of a single, even anecdotical, incident where a software company could have been held liable for whatever their product barfed.

      I'll give you an anecdote to support your claim:

      Last week, I made a support call to a supplier of our document template support system: a bug in the installer caused several .dll-files to be installed in the data-dir (network share) instead of the program dir. It went unnoticed until I uninstalled the software for one user (no need to fill in the blanks here...). When I mentioned it to them, they quite literally said "we screwed up, we're sorry". I was baffled...

      It is considered rare, when a software company owns up to their failures; liability is unthinkable. To their credit, a re-spun msi image was available from their website two hours later.

    47. Re:Well... by n3tcat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Did a deadline just pass me by again while I was wasting time on slashdot?

    48. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we're witnessing the beginnings a new slashdot meme...

    49. Re:Well... by jez9999 · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, pendi.

    50. Re:Well... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      You're saying that AV software is worthless crap, and AV companies are irritating and generally refuse to improve their products, yet recommending that most people use it. Not trying to sound pedantic, just pointing out your message in a nutshell. It's ridiculous. You shouldn't be advising people to use this stuff. Personally, I'd just work on more end-user education, getting OSes more inherently secure, and dealing with the occasional system fuckup. Don't waste time with AV products.

    51. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think we're witnessing the beginnings a new slashdot meme...

      I hope not. I am already infinitely more tired of the current ZOMG-twitter-has-sockpuppets meme than I ever was of twitter himself.

    52. Re:Well... by eulernet · · Score: 1

      Use this free service: http://www.virustotal.com/

      Upload your exe, and it will check if the last updated antiviruses tag it as a virus.

    53. Re:Well... by Kris_J · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A couple of months ago AVG decided that Portable Thunderbird was a trojan. After an update, hey, no it's not.

      I used to recommend it to anyone who needed anti-virus for a home PC but now I recommend Avast and I'll be removing the last remaining AVG install on any of my PCs the next time it screws up in any way.

    54. Re:Well... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Isn't that why almost every Unix OS strongly encourages you to do anything with a user account? I'd rather have the power and not use it than not have the power at all.

    55. Re:Well... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Or Windows Explorer is caching thumbnails, or just decides it feels like not letting you delete the directory today. Or it's open by any application. Like a virus. It happens all the time. As for Unix, yeah, it will certainly let you try.

    56. Re:Well... by Hooded+One · · Score: 4, Informative

      I doubt Unix would either.

      And you'd be wrong. It doesn't crash because deleting an open file in Unix only unlinks it from the filesystem tree, leaving the contents alone. Only when all programs release the file does the deletion complete.

    57. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html

      Wait, are you implying that the correct name for Nintendo's gaming console is Wuses?

    58. Re:Well... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      Screw that, I've rm -rf'ed myself once. They don't let you shoot yourself in the foot. They give you a high powered sniper rifle with a laser sight and then cheer you on! Taunting you all the while with a file called /./\ delete\ me.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    59. Re:Well... by Yazeran · · Score: 1

      Yes which is the reason that you can delete, move or rename /vmunix without any problems (except when you some weeks in the future has to reboot and forgot what you did... :-)

      Yours Yazeran

      Plan: To go to Mars one day with a hammer

    60. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is nothing new.

      In fact after a fresh install of AVG 8.0 earlier this year I lost my *ENTIRE* thunderbird inbox because AVg during a nightly scan found a virus in *one* of the emails.

      Again the forums we're ablaze about it. Some posts even dated back to beta releases of 8.0 before it went final.

      Bottom line. They knew 8.0 was deleting valid data in very specific cases but they didn't think it important enough to fix for almost a year!

      That's why I'm done using AVG.

    61. Re:Well... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Would storing it in a password protected zip file be less hassle?

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    62. Re:Well... by jc42 · · Score: 1

      Imagine the consequences to a person who kept falsely telling millions of people your product would infect their computers. It would surely be grounds for libel.

      No, it would be grounds for a charge of slander. This is a standard popular misunderstanding. The general explanation is that slander is spoken, libel is written.

      Since software is written by a person or group of persons, if that software said that your product was doing something that it wasn't doing, it should be grounds for a charge of libel against the person or persons who wrote the software. There should be no material difference between this and their making the same claims in written English.

      Have there been any court decisions saying that false accusations made by software is not libel on the part of the software's authors? Has any court decided that software isn't "writing"? Are there any legal experts on the topic lurking here who can tell us?

      If this hasn't been tested in court, perhaps it's about time someone did. Good luck finding a judge or jury that understands what software is.

      --
      Those who do study history are doomed to stand helplessly by while everyone else repeats it.
    63. Re:Well... by chrish · · Score: 4, Informative

      This is often (usually?) filesystem stupidity. Specifically, that in Windows (and DOS before it for that matter), an open file is considered sacrosanct. You can't delete it until everybody closes their file handles. Everybody, no exceptions.

      This is very bad when Windows helpfully caches things for you, like DLLs and EXEs, even after you've exitted the program. That's why you often have to reboot after installing something innocuous like Acrobat.

      UNIX filesystem semantics are superior here; it's the DOS legacy that keeps Windows from changing its behaviour.

      --
      - chrish
    64. Re:Well... by Eunuchswear · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or because administrater doesn't have permission. Under windows it doesn't necessarily. It does have permission to change the permissions though.

      --
      Watch this Heartland Institute video
    65. Re:Well... by frito_x · · Score: 1

      i sooo hate it when that happens... grrrrr.

    66. Re:Well... by JediTrainer · · Score: 1

      Hear hear.

      We don't distribute software per se, but our online application does generate reports in Excel format using a fairly popular OSS package as the export library.

      It's a whole lot of fun when we get emails from users complaining that their emails are having their report attachment stripped, because it has a "virus" called "CorruptedCompressedFile" in it (some AV scanners apparently bork because they detect the file wasn't created in Excel, and thus assume it's contaminated).

      --

      You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    67. Re:Well... by rezalas · · Score: 1

      Obviously AVG doesn't use its own virus scanner. Pathetic.

    68. Re:Well... by jebrew · · Score: 1

      No script. Learn it, love it.

    69. Re:Well... by jebrew · · Score: 1

      Pedantasuses?

    70. Re:Well... by a1x2 · · Score: 1

      ...virii?...

      You're right, virii.

    71. Re:Well... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 1

      Viruses is the correct plural. Virii only makes you look like a pretentious fuckwit and is piss-poor Latin grammar.

      Now that that's settled, we can move on to the next issue: the correct plural of 'Unix'. Is it 'Unices', or 'Unixen'?

    72. Re:Well... by Otter+Popinski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Viri already has a Latin meaning, it means 'men'. So, even if the old rule about pluralising Latin words ending with '-us' to '-i' was not obsolete (and it is), 'viri' would still be wrong.

      The correct word is 'viruses'.

      That's because "virus" in Latin is neuter, while "vir" is masculine. The Latin plural for "virus" is "vira" (in the nominative, anyway).

    73. Re:Well... by Hatta · · Score: 1

      Funny how everyone will complain about the use of the word 'virii', but nobody bats an eyebrow about the bizarre construction 'OSen'.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    74. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Much like the fabled Xboxen that roamed the fruited plains of the Midwestern U.S., the legendary Unices have been, until recently, spotted dancing and prancing merrily in the ethereal forests of the lands of Basementine. Sadly, these endangered creatures have been driven out by their more advanced relatives, the Windowens.

    75. Re:Well... by jsoderba · · Score: 1

      I think that history clearly shows UNIX users are linguistically irredeemable, so there is no point.

    76. Re:Well... by Soruk · · Score: 2, Funny

      MULTICS.

      Of course.

      --
      -- Soruk
    77. Re:Well... by theaveng · · Score: 1

      A joke's pretty worthless if your audience does not understand it. You might as well be speaking in Japanese.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    78. Re:Well... by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Can I have one Spaghetto please?

      And I'll take a Macarono too.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    79. Re:Well... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 2, Informative

      XP Explorer also likes to leak file handles every now and again, which has every so often prevented me from being able to delete something.

      Fortunately Sysinternals' Handles tool exists and is very useful and awesome.

    80. Re:Well... by theaveng · · Score: 1

      Isn't that why almost every Unix OS strongly encourages you to do anything with a user account? I'd rather have the power and not use it than not have the power at all.

      You just summarized my belief of how I think American politics should be.

      --
      FOX NEWS.com should be BANNED from television and internet. Have the Congress take it over and give us Truespeak.
    81. Re:Well... by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      I'm seeing state and local governments being the user accounts, while the fed is the administrator, which is to be sparingly used. Am I on track, or did you have a different thought?

    82. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mount /remotefolder
      cd /remotefolder
      umount /remotefolder

      Does this work, or does the OS stop the superuser from completing the command?

    83. Re:Well... by Larryish · · Score: 1

      Penduses?

    84. Re:Well... by Jorgandar · · Score: 1

      windii?

    85. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedantasusesi?

    86. Re:Well... by omfglearntoplay · · Score: 1

      Somebody mod this guy up. The smartest thing MS ever did was buy Sysinternals... those guys know what they are doing.

    87. Re:Well... by M1000 · · Score: 1

      Usually AV are lazy "string" (bytes) scanners, and could detect those bytes signatures databases on other products. But I would assume any program would at least encrypt their db...

    88. Re:Well... by Aldekei · · Score: 1

      Really?! Are you kidding me? Don't try to look educated without doing a bit of homework first. Virii is an excepted pluralized form of virus. Sure this is based upon a misuse/misunderstanding of Latin, but to say "viruses" is correct is equally off. Virus just happens to be one of those silly words that does not have a proper plural form.

    89. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      int count;
      for (count=0; count < 100; count++)
      printf("The plural of 'virus' is 'viruses'\n");

    90. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you've never had headaches from NFS locking

    91. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAWW!! NEVER! GETS! OLD!

    92. Re:Well... by Atario · · Score: 1

      Can I have one Spaghetto please?

      I'm sorry, you seem to have misspelt "pasketto".

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    93. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a similar situation at work. The main corporate AV scanner I have does not always remove the threat - especially that XP Antivrus 2009 fake AV package - and I have to turn to freeware av scans to ensure the PC is clean. At least the corporate AV does not detect the freeware AV as a virus.

    94. Re:Well... by againjj · · Score: 1

      I love deadlines. I like the whooshing sound they make as they fly by.

    95. Re:Well... by ChameleonDave · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's because "virus" in Latin is neuter, while "vir" is masculine. The Latin plural for "virus" is "vira" (in the nominative, anyway).

      Wrong. "Virus" in Latin had no plural. It was a mass noun meaning "poison", "foulness". One can guess at what the plural form would have been ("vira", "virus", "virua"...) but you cannot state it as a fact.

      In English, its plural is "viruses". In Latin, it had no plural. I actually don't mind "viri" too much. It's naive, but a reasonable mistake to make, given precedents such as "cacti". What annoys me is "virii", which is just idiotic.

      I wish I'd linked my first "No" to Wikipedia, to nip this thread in the bud.

    96. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Pedii. :)

    97. Re:Well... by OldeClegg · · Score: 1

      You mean, my detachable Virii?

    98. Re:Well... by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      Why wouldn't it just be Unixes seeing how Unix is a proper noun in most cases.

    99. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Virii is a good way to catch pendants though.

      I think you mean someone who is exacting in their subject (pedant), not something that hangs around your neck (pendant). ;-) (Anonymous Coward Pedant)

    100. Re:Well... by JimFive · · Score: 1

      Actually viri is the plural of vir(man). As far as I can tell virus is not a latin word.
      --
      JimFive

      --
      Please stop using the word theory when you mean hypothesis.
    101. Re:Well... by wiz_80 · · Score: 1

      I know it's incorrect, but plurals of acronyms are always weird. Technically, OS should stand for both Operating System and Operating Systems. In actual usage, people tend to make plurals of acronyms exactly as they do with real nouns, that is, adding an S at the end. However, OSs looks weird, and also risks overloading OSS, a valid acronym in its own right.

      Therefore, since we already use the pseudo-germanic -en plural for other nouns (boxen), why not OSen?

      --
      " There is a rational explanation for everything. There is also an irrational one. "
    102. Re:Well... by Otter+Popinski · · Score: 1

      Wrong. "Virus" in Latin had no plural.

      You're right, of course. I only remembered the gender and declension.

      I wish I'd linked my first "No" to Wikipedia, to nip this thread in the bud.

      You started this thread and seem perfectly willing to participate in it.

    103. Re:Well... by genotype · · Score: 1

      Just like it's technically correct, although arguably pedantic, that plural of octopus is 'octopuses,' as octopus is of Greek origin and Greek isn't pluralized by changing 'us' to 'i.' If you wanted to be really technical, the plural of octopus should be octopodes (or something). If octopus were of Latin origin, I believe it would be more along the lines of octoped. Oh, and it should also be written in a different alphabet.

    104. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wuss -> Wii ?

    105. Re:Well... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "(...) Virii only makes you look like a pretentious fuckwit and is piss-poor Latin grammar.

      http://linuxmafia.com/~rick/faq/plural-of-virus.html

      Now write it out 100 times. If it's not done by sunrise, I'll cut your balls off."

      You make pretty convincing pretentious fuckwit yourself.

    106. Re:Well... by Atario · · Score: 1

      You must be a blast at parties.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    107. Re:Well... by Irvan · · Score: 0

      at least it let us to format c: 'sometimes the moron called himself as idiot'

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    108. Re:Well... by Irvan · · Score: 0

      why not like open office
      OOo
      OoO
      ooO
      Ooo


      'sometimes the moron called himself as idiot'

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    109. Re:Well... by Irvan · · Score: 0

      like my SP3 makes me have to F5 to see updated list



      'sometimes the moron called himself as idiot'

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    110. Re:Well... by Irvan · · Score: 0

      Reallllyy....? so why don't u stop give ur customer viruses(viruses right? not viri). :)

      --
      'sometime the moron called himself as idiot'
    111. Re:Well... by cbellh47 · · Score: 0

      You must be one of the nazi-grammar policemen I hear about here on slashdot. Your post kind of contradicts yourself with that non-word pretentious thing and improper adjective to describe Latin grammar that you used. I understood perfectly, however. So what kind of penalty are you going to impose on yourself or ahould I report you to the the head-nazi. But this could backfire and you may come back at me like was done to Joe the Plumber for asking a question. So I will go back into my hole now where nazi-grammar-police aren't allowed. There is a sign at the entrance to that effect.

    112. Re:Well... by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      Oh be fair. It's not like the other product's reason to exist was to find malware. I could offer you in return that no AV product I know of ever fubar'd a database, but I do know a few database products that did.

      And you might be surprised, but the reputable AV companies do actually have such a contact address, or will quickly forward your complaints to the relevant departments. Response times are usually around 2-3 hours.

      You might notice I said reputable. I don't mean the ones that put more money into marketing and kickbacks than in R&D. And yes, an industry standard for this would be awefully nice. Also for AV companies.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  2. doh by phaetonic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    you get what you pay for?

    1. Re:doh by ShadowBlasko · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you get what you pay for?

      So, those of us who have paid for (what used to be called) the SoHo version, or any of the other versions should just grin and bare it? I dont think so. I'm pissed. It's not all freeware

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order- Ed Howdershelt Via Tass
    2. Re:doh by McNally · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you get what you pay for?

      It'd be nice to think that that was true, but based on the number of totally f'ed up McAfee and Norton situations I've seen, it's not even close to safe to conclude that for-pay anti-virus products are reliably more trouble-free than ones that don't cost money for home use.

    3. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually the free versions always get their updates later than the paid for versions, so it's the paying customers who were affected the most by this.

    4. Re:doh by Daimanta · · Score: 2, Funny

      So not paying institutes messing up your pc?

      Then I know some people from the Cosa Nostra that I want you to meet...

      --
      Knowledge is power. Knowledge shared is power lost.
    5. Re:doh by Adambomb · · Score: 1

      should just grin and bare it?

      Well yes, actually, as depending on what you bare to them it can be a very effective statement.

      ESPECIALLY if you're grinning while you bare it.

      --
      Ice Cream has no bones.
    6. Re:doh by TornCityVenz · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's Why I moved to Linux....oh wait...nevermind.

      --
      I Need someone to rebuild a Digitech Digital Delay pedal for me....for me...for me...for me.
    7. Re:doh by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Careful what you bare, you saw how quick it cut off that dll file :D

    8. Re:doh by Kjella · · Score: 1

      based on the number of totally f'ed up McAfee and Norton situations I've seen

      Norton couldn't pay me enough to run their home AV solution again, ever. Even their own salesmen said it was crap to have some credibility when pushing the enterprise version. I use AVG as a confirmation of my own good sense on my Windows machines, and if nothing else it's been quietly sitting in the corner doing its job (or not). At least it hasn't been a pain in the butt like certain other software, so despite this blunder I'm quite likely going to continue using it. Well that, and Linux on the rest but that's another story. Despite these news I still have faith that AVG is the least crappy of the bunch - and that's saying alot.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
    9. Re:doh by thetrick · · Score: 5, Informative
    10. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn you Linus you've DOOMED US ALL!!!

    11. Re:doh by IorDMUX · · Score: 4, Funny

      Why do people always decide to grin and bare it on Slashdot? I mean, couldn't they at least include a NSFW tag?

      It's just not Kosher, sometimes.

      --
      >> Standing on head makes smile of frown, but rest of face also upside down.
    12. Re:doh by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 4, Interesting

      AVG failed to detect dozens of viruses and malware on my sister's computer that Avast cleared out. Avast isn't perfect, but they're both free, and it's my experience that Avast is more reliable than AVG. As always, YMMV.

    13. Re:doh by dunezone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It deletes a single file that can be recovered painlessly. On the other hand Norton will install itself where it spawns god knows what else into the system. And the worst part is that even after you kill the damn program there is still shit left over controlling your system. Heck, they even make a special program just designed to uninstall it.

    14. Re:doh by kiddygrinder · · Score: 4, Funny

      I run AVG in wine. how else can i tell if i'm getting the viruses!

      --
      This is a joke. I am joking. Joke joke joke.
    15. Re:doh by Machtyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      Interestingly, as a non-paying customer, I was affected by this bug. I now have three programs that I will not be able to uninstall. AVG detected their uninstaller file as a virus and deleted them.

      How many times will Grisoft pull this crap? First flooding teh intertubes now deleting my l33t filez.

      Some time ago I was recommending this and installing this program on all computers. Now, I'm just waiting for Comodo to get their act together and release an AV product I can trust.

    16. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      :blink: Why is your anti-virus deleting files instead of quarantining them!?

    17. Re:doh by zippthorne · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Are you sure it's a subset and not a union? Which AV program did you run first?

      --
      Can you be Even More Awesome?!
    18. Re:doh by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      I agree. As someone deals with viruses on an almost daily basis I suggest avast and spybot to detect (if not remove) viruses. These two don't catch them all, but they usually make the system usable enough to remove the rest (the pre-boot avast check is especially useful). Also from my own experience: beware kaspersky! While it is good at preventing infections, my experience with virus ridden systems is that it makes them unbootable. Various other anti-malware/virus tools are hit and miss, and while detection has improved in programs like mcafee, I have found they still require manual removal.

      --
      Get a web developer
    19. Re:doh by Opportunist · · Score: 1

      With Norton and McAfee you buy into the smile of the PR and sales guys. The scanner is basically free, what you pay for is PR and sales.

      --
      We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
    20. Re:doh by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      AVG was run first (it was already installed), so I have no evidence to suggest Avast is actually superior in detection ability other than the fact that it detected several viruses that AVG did not detect. But like I said, YMMV.

    21. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Norton has no relevance to this story. The discussion is not about Norton. Norton sucking does not make AVG suck less.

    22. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AVG is great for most viruses you encounter in the wild. Avast is great for the kind of stuff you run into on hardcore tranny scat fetish websites.

      What was it your sister does for a living?

    23. Re:doh by vux984 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. As someone deals with viruses on an almost daily basis I suggest avast and spybot to detect (if not remove) viruses. These two don't catch them all, but they usually make the system usable enough to remove the rest (the pre-boot avast check is especially useful). Also from my own experience: beware kaspersky! While it is good at preventing infections, my experience with virus ridden systems is that it makes them unbootable. Various other anti-malware/virus tools are hit and miss, and while detection has improved in programs like mcafee, I have found they still require manual removal.

      Installing and performing multiple scans in multiple AV products takes longer than just reinstalling windows on MOST PCs. And reinstalling windows misses less and cleans out general windows rot too. If you're a large enough company that you have recovery images, it takes even less time.

      But it takes me maybe 3.5 hours to backup key data, then repartition, reformat, install XPSP3, drivers, configure the network identification, printers, and install Office, filemaker, citrix xenapp client, java runtime, flash, acrobat reader, firefox, our remote support software, configure email, and perform updates (including ie7), restore data, configure email, etc on one of our office PCs. On machines where we have a good restore image, we can wipe and image in an hour-ish, including data backup and restore.

      It easily takes 8+ hours to run an AVG scan, avast scan, spybot scans, and then manually troubleshoot and remove the stuff that's left, and takes a miniumum of 3-4 hours.

    24. Re:doh by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Painlessly? It requires using Windows Recovery Console which necessitates having boot media available. My desktop can't boot off normal XP installation media due to a lack of AHCI drivers so I had to slipstream my own - I haven't figured out how to make a slipstream disk that still allows Recovery Console. My flatmates laptop doesn't have an optical drive and requires netbooting, which in turn requires a Windows Server nearby. If it causes someone like me problems, you can guarantee it will cause many non-technical users a great deal of grief.

    25. Re:doh by value_added · · Score: 1

      Painlessly? It requires using Windows Recovery Console which necessitates having boot media available.

      You can install Recovery Console locally and set it up as a boot option.

      The drawbacks include:

      1. Not appropriate for most users.
      2. Boot time reminder that the Recovery Console is mostly useless.

    26. Re:doh by awshidahak · · Score: 1

      painlessly provided you can get to the recovery console. my moms computer only comes with a "recovery disk" that wipes the hard drive clean and reinstalls everything including all the hp crapware that you have to waste time deleting afterward. she uses avg. i sure hope that she doesn't install the update.

    27. Re:doh by hughk · · Score: 1

      ClamWin runs quite nicely under Linux - sounds crazy but if you have some SMB shares, it is faster to run the AV directly on the SMB server and it runs natively.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    28. Re:doh by Prune · · Score: 1

      I have AVG on my computer, but I've started installing Antivir on others' now and I have to say I might switch myself.

      --
      "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    29. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn! It must suck to not be able to drop into root/single user mode.

    30. Re:doh by Micrll · · Score: 1

      AVG failed to detect dozens of viruses and malware on my sister's computer that Avast cleared out. Avast isn't perfect, but they're both free, and it's my experience that Avast is more reliable than AVG. As always, YMMV.

      Same thing here on a smaller scale, AVG let in two viruses on its watch, though it did have the decency to let me know that they were there, after they installed themselves. I switched my parents computer to Avast. Have not had a problem except for having to reregister each year and I was able to walk my mother through that. Also on the plus side, I actually appreciate its verbal alert that a new virus database has been installed, I can always check with my parents that everything is good by asking them if they have heard the computer update recently.

    31. Re:doh by Harold+Halloway · · Score: 1

      I think these people are the type who could care less about their grammar.

    32. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If it is kosher it's even barer.

    33. Re:doh by pipatron · · Score: 1

      Care to post an URL?

      --
      c++; /* this makes c bigger but returns the old value */
    34. Re:doh by hairyfeet · · Score: 1

      Here you go. XP ISO Builder will let you turn her recovery disc into a regular install disc,as well as slipstream service packs,drivers,user accounts,software,etc. So easy my 15 year old nephew can do it. So much better than dealing with those crapware recovery discs. Oh,and it works on 2K and 2K3 too. But it would probably be smart to make one for your mom before something happens to bone her PC. Because lets face it,it Windows and it'll get boned sooner or later. Better safe than screwed.

      --
      ACs don't waste your time replying, your posts are never seen by me.
    35. Re:doh by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      ClamAV runs quite well at Linux too. Why use a ported software when you can have the original?

      Also, if you have a SMB share, take a look at clamfs. It works like "-o bind", but runs clamav on everything that is written. You simply mount a protected fs somewhere and export this one, instead of the original dir.

    36. Re:doh by cffrost · · Score: 1
      --
      Thank you, Edward Snowden.

      "Arguments from authority are worthless." —Carl Sagan
    37. Re:doh by stevegee58 · · Score: 1

      Funny. By coincidence I switched both PCs in the house over to Avast about a month ago. I can't say if it's actually better or not detection-wise, but it's waaaaaaaay faster. AVG is a real resource hog; that was my main motivation to switch to Avast. In addition, I rather resented AVG's constant presumption that I'd buy the full version. Avast is what it is without being pushy.

    38. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Painlessly? It requires using Windows Recovery Console which necessitates having boot media available. My desktop can't boot off normal XP installation media due to a lack of AHCI drivers so I had to slipstream my own - I haven't figured out how to make a slipstream disk that still allows Recovery Console. My flatmates laptop doesn't have an optical drive and requires netbooting, which in turn requires a Windows Server nearby. If it causes someone like me problems, you can guarantee it will cause many non-technical users a great deal of grief.

      have you tried disabling AHCI from BIOS - I found this handy on a laptop where I too had to employ a slipstreamed ahci driver technique

    39. Re:doh by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I'm amazed it took this long for someone to make this comment.

      It's for reasons like this I have not had an AV app auto-delete "hits" in YEARS.

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    40. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... let's see. d-e-l-e-t-e is easier to spell and type than q-u-a-r-a-n-t-i-n-i-n-g. Yes, I know their different.

    41. Re:doh by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      And, as a paying customer, I wasn't.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    42. Re:doh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wait your nick is HeronBlademaster so we should take you seriously? BWA HA HA HA HA HA.

      Dork. And I know it's all a front - you actually work on Avast.

    43. Re:doh by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      I haven't figured out how to make a slipstream disk that still allows Recovery Console

      They're also known as "Linux Live CDs".

    44. Re:doh by msimm · · Score: 1

      Yep. Good AV programs are always going to be something of a moving target. AVG started getting screwy a few years ago and I jumped to Avast. I don't know or have time to care what might be going on internally at the company, but if your tech and still using what was once a good product, it's time to update your arsenal.

      I think Avast is still a good option, but I use Avira AntiVir. They both score pretty highly. And both have their quirks (Avast has a terrible gui and Avira presents a friendly 'pop-up' after it updates to remind you they have a pay version).

      --
      Quack, quack.
    45. Re:doh by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      ClamWin? Do you mean ClamAv?

    46. Re:doh by ais523 · · Score: 1

      I run ClamAV on my Linux laptop because my ISP's (a company ISP) terms of service say that computers that connect via it have to have virus scanners installed. It hasn't found anything yet, nor do I expect it to...

      --
      (1)DOCOMEFROM!2~.2'~#1WHILE:1<-"'?.1$.2'~'"':1/.1$.2'~#0"$#65535'"$"'"'&.1$.2'~'#0$#65535'"$#0'~#32767$#1"
    47. Re:doh by David_W · · Score: 1

      Why is your anti-virus deleting files instead of quarantining them!?

      That's a great question, and the primary reason I switched away from AVG when version 7 came out and the default action went from quarantine to delete. (The secondary being all the pieces of it I didn't want, like the Firefox integration, that it put on without making it really clear what it was doing.)

    48. Re:doh by GigaplexNZ · · Score: 1

      I wasn't aware these "Linux Live CDs" had a spare copy of user32.dll in the correct version, and many don't have write access to NTFS by default. While it is possible to use them to fix the problem, it is still not what I would consider "painless".

    49. Re:doh by datapharmer · · Score: 1

      I agree that reinstalling generally takes less time in a corporate environment, but when you have someone with old hardware, hard-to-find drivers, no backups or install disks and personal data scattered all over the drive it is better to try and remove than to wipe it out, hope you can find the right drivers and hope you got everything backed up that they will need. I can run a virus scanner unattended for the most part, but on OS reinstall has prompts unless you have an image or OEM setup pre-configured which you usually won't have for an individual. Besides, removing a virus by wiping out a system and reinstalling does no good if you are just going to put the same old data back on that may in fact be the original culprit. Sure you can scan it, but then you are back to spending time going over a bunch of data by running several scanners. Moral of the story: make backups of your data, drivers, and config files (or even better make an OS image and backups) Moral of the Moral: people who get viruses also tend to be the same people who won't have those things.

      --
      Get a web developer
    50. Re:doh by entrylevel · · Score: 1

      Holy crap. Why not run ClamAV proper in Linux instead of ClamWin???

      --
      Karma: Incomprehensible (Mostly affected by posting at +5, reading at -1, and metamoderating everything unfair.)
    51. Re:doh by sumdumass · · Score: 1

      I used Antivir for a while until the discontinued win9x support. I then had to drop them. What I liked about it back then (and yes, this was a while ago) was that if you downloaded a current file, the definitions were also current or within just a few days. I'm not sure if it is the same now but that was such a great help when you couldn't put an infected machine on the net.

      Maybe I should take another look at them.

    52. Re:doh by hughk · · Score: 1

      Sorry, Yes, I meant its Linux brother.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
    53. Re:doh by hughk · · Score: 1

      As mentioned, I meant ClamAV, my bad!!!

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  3. It's sad... by FF8Jake · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It seems like AVG has gone massively downhill lately.

    1. Re:It's sad... by WiglyWorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      After having read this, I think I may switch back to Avast.

    2. Re:It's sad... by Finallyjoined!!! · · Score: 3, Funny

      I must admit I don't recommend it anymore, however if it kills Windows systems it's just gone up in my estimation :-)

      --
      If I had an Ass, I'd call it Fanny Bottom, then I could slap my Ass; Fanny Bottom, on the Arse.
    3. Re:It's sad... by LSD-OBS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You said it, brother. We stopped using it when they released v8.0

      They've completely lost the plot. Marketing-bullshit-driven crap, no doubt.

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    4. Re:It's sad... by phmadore · · Score: 1

      If only there were more opensource coders who used Windows primarily, there'd probably be an anti-virus along the lines of Filezilla, Firefox, Openoffice, and so on...

    5. Re:It's sad... by mofag · · Score: 1

      I agree. I bought the full version to have more control over what it did but the full version just takes over your PC in a similar fashion to symantec or mcaffee. It seems like the only way to have a safe computer is to not use it and that's the way these "security" suites are going: "we'll make your PC unusable so you don't get into trouble"

    6. Re:It's sad... by negRo_slim · · Score: 1

      Marketing-bullshit-driven crap, no doubt.

      True enough, but it's not so bad you can't live with it... except that lower "notification bar" that never stays hidden. It simply returns to spew more FUD, like did you know that nearly 80% of all websites kill a kitten when you visit with out a spyware blocker?

      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    7. Re:It's sad... by TENTH+SHOW+JAM · · Score: 1

      Not really, people who code for open source have a vested interest in doing things once, doing them properly and never having to do them again. This is usually because the individual coders reputation is on the line. Thus we see the ultimate Open Source solution for anti virus is to remove the vectors which viruses cannot attack.

      Built in security beats tacked onto the side any day.

      Now I know that Open Source still has bugs that allow viruses to propagate, but the solution is usually that the writers of the original code fix the hole rather than someone else selling a tacked on solution.

      --
      A sig is placed here
      To display how futile
      English Haiku is
    8. Re:It's sad... by fuzzyfuzzyfungus · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm not sure that there would be. Antivirus is one of those things that(at least until actual heuristic scanning that seriously works comes out) leans heavily on having a whole bunch of security guys and worker drones hammering out signature updates all day every day. That isn't something that falls under "The Open Source is strong with this one". In particular, antivirus is basically a bandaid designed to let clueless users use critically flawed systems without understanding them. If OSS coders were more common on Windows, they would probably just read and write to any of the various guides for running Windows with minimal privileges, and ignore the problem.

    9. Re:It's sad... by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
      --
      .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    10. Re:It's sad... by maxume · · Score: 5, Informative

      Go to the install directory and rename "avgresf.dll" and "afgmwdef_us.mht" (adding a .bak or whatever should work fine). I did this a few days ago and the notification bar is no more, with no apparent problems.

      Also, don't tell anyone, to prevent AVG from changing it.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    11. Re:It's sad... by JustOK · · Score: 1

      Thus we see the ultimate Open Source solution for anti virus is to remove the vectors which viruses cannot attack.

      And no one has the authority to say that they didn't get it quite right: they should be removing vectors which viruses CAN attack.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    12. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I use my kitten as a spyware blocker. Will it die?

      Damn, wheres Schroedinger when I need him.

    13. Re:It's sad... by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 5, Funny

      "nearly 80% of all websites kill a kitten when you visit with out a spyware blocker?"

      It's actually one of the HTTP status codes

      463 - NO_MORE_KITTEN

    14. Re:It's sad... by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, they used to be very good, but they have gone all terrible. First, they started hiding all evidence to their free version from their website (you have to know to go to free.grisoft.com otherwise there is no link from their main website, though it is back up now), misleading licensing, then their version 8 started doing all sort of crap like hogging resources, scanning every weblink and generating massive amount of web traffic (though it can be turned off), and having bugs every week like marking legitimate files as infected and irritatingly requiring a computer restart every time you turn it on (requires a reinstall to fix it).

      They have gone all shite, and I'm massively put off by them now, and I will recommend anyone against buying or using their stuff. They are just plain sloppy now, and frankly you don't want your first or second line of defence to be sloppy.

      After our current license term expires, my company will be switching away to another vendor.

    15. Re:It's sad... by BronsCon · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thus we see the ultimate Open Source solution for anti virus is to remove the vectors which viruses cannot attack.

      So, Microsoft got it right?

      --
      APK quotes people (including myself) without context and should not be trusted. Just thought you should know.
    16. Re:It's sad... by narcberry · · Score: 4, Funny

      Also, don't tell anyone, to prevent AVG from changing it.

      Especially not any popular websites.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    17. Re:It's sad... by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      You do realize that any account that can execute arbitrary code can end up virus infected right?

      On any operating system?

      Don't confuse the fact that your OS of choice for this discussion has a statistically irrelevant percentage of the market share therefor no one bothers to write attacks against it with some sort of special power that prevents it from being infected.

      Your an idiot for thinking that not having admin privs makes you immune from virus issues. It make make your system safe, but you can still become part of a botnet, your files can still be destroyed, and performance can still be effected, it just may not bother others on your OS of choice. Its entirely possible for an OS running off a live cd can be exploited and be used as part of a botnet or to spread a virus for instance. Likewise, root services aren't required. All you need is some way to get some code of your own started. Everything else is mitigation. Antivirus, firewalls, anti-spyware, IDS system, all of them are ways to mitigate a problem that can't be solved. No more than there is a common cure to every thing that makes living beings sick and die.

      OSS doesn't solve the problem, and your ignorant for thinking that the two are in any way related. Perhaps making it so security holes are plugged faster may help, but it also makes it easier for 'the bad guys' to find exploits, please stop being a fanboy and learn about how it works rather than spew this sort of ignorance, kthx

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    18. Re:It's sad... by steveha · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Antivirus is one of those things that(at least until actual heuristic scanning that seriously works comes out) leans heavily on having a whole bunch of security guys and worker drones hammering out signature updates all day every day. That isn't something that falls under "The Open Source is strong with this one".

      Hmmm, not sure I agree. I have always thought that the open source community could do a great job with antivirus.

      The key is to get a large community of people who, when they discover a new virus, contribute their knowledge back to the open source project. And I think this is actually working with ClamAV.

      I know that I have submitted my share of viruses... when I get an email offering me a cool new screen saver, and the file is called "screensave.scr.exe", I scan it with ClamAV. If ClamAV doesn't spot anything wrong, I'll submit that file to the ClamAV project.

      Usually I submit the file at VirusTotal first, and attach the report to my submission.

      ClamAV gets signatures very quickly for new viruses as they appear. The whole signature-based game is a continual game of catchup, though. I agree that heuristic-based scanning would be preferable, but that seems like a hard problem.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    19. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > If only there were more opensource coders who used Windows primarily, there'd probably be an anti-virus along the lines of Filezilla, Firefox, Openoffice, and so on...

      There is at least one open source anti-virus for Windows.

      http://www.moonsecure.com/

      Apart from free virus database updates, Moon Secure ant-virus isn't much different form the others though, since it will still allow you to delete a file which is critical bit of Windows if a virus has managed to attach itself to that system file.

      Windows and the very concept of anti-virus is inane anyway ... fancy trying to fix an attack on your system by detecting a problem only AFTER it has compromised your system. Talk about an exercise in wishful thinking ...

    20. Re:It's sad... by e+r+i+k+0 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm thinking that's a server-side error, so it should actually be 563 No More Kitten if you're following RFC 2616 correctly.

    21. Re:It's sad... by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      Ok, sure... But what is the free alternative? Avast is ok, but has failed me twice, and is audibly annoying. Avira seems ok so far, but has popups. Low sig AV programs are hard to come by to begin with, free-flav aside...

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    22. Re:It's sad... by RobertM1968 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You do realize that any account that can execute arbitrary code can end up virus infected right?

      On any operating system?

      You do realize there is a major difference between an OS's ability to run a virus - and an OS's prevalence to being able to be infected through numerous, never-quite-patched-correctly holes, buffer over/underrun exploits, back doors, open sockets on a TCP/IP stack (that based on it's origin should have been decent) that has been horrendously mangled into a security threat?

      There is a big difference between the two. If all Operating Systems had equal market share, Windows would in all probability still have the lion's share of infections simply because there have been tons of flaws/holes in the OS to allow it to be easily infected.

      Yes, there are lists that show the numbers often being equal - in quantity... but a true in depth study of the list will show that many of the windows vulnerabilities turned out to be very very simple to exploit - so easy any script kiddie could do it... and that many of those vulnerabilities were never completely fixed and resurfaced utilizing a slightly different access vector.

      Add to that, every other OS out there has a better track record at fixing such holes - while Microsoft has often either (a) went out of their way to downplay the issues or (b) outright denied the issues until there was a big enough public outcry. That too adds to the number of infected machines on each platform (again, assuming each had equal market penetration) and once again would lead to Windows still being waaaaay at the top of the mountain.

      Of course, by your scenario, you seem to equate "people installing viruses on their own machine via the computer's I/O devices" or "allowing others to do it directly at the machine" the equivalent of a machine that is far easier to infect via external, networked methods. Sadly (for your argument) that is preposterous.

    23. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't confuse the fact that your OS of choice for this discussion has a statistically irrelevant percentage of the market share therefor no one bothers to write attacks against it with some sort of special power that prevents it from being infected.

      Your an idiot for thinking that not having admin privs makes you immune from virus issues. It make make your system safe, but you can still become part of a botnet, your files can still be destroyed, and performance can still be effected, it just may not bother others on your OS of choice. Its entirely possible for an OS running off a live cd can be exploited and be used as part of a botnet or to spread a virus for instance. Likewise, root services aren't required. All you need is some way to get some code of your own started. Everything else is mitigation. Antivirus, firewalls, anti-spyware, IDS system, all of them are ways to mitigate a problem that can't be solved. No more than there is a common cure to every thing that makes living beings sick and die.

      OSS doesn't solve the problem, and your ignorant for thinking that the two are in any way related. Perhaps making it so security holes are plugged faster may help, but it also makes it easier for 'the bad guys' to find exploits, please stop being a fanboy and learn about how it works rather than spew this sort of ignorance, kthx

      This would be a beautiful theory if it weren't for the inconvenient truth. The simple fact is that all viruses, malware, spyware and botnet zombie code runs on Windows machines.

      If anyone running a Linux system simply adopts a self-imposed policy of "I will only install software from the repositories using the package management system" ... then their system is guaranteed to never get malware.

      This has nothing to do with obscurity of Linux systems. It has only to do with four things:
      (1) Installing Linux software using the package manager requires the local system administration password to be manually entered.
      (2) All software in the repositories is "visible" to the developers who put it there, and they use that software themselves (so they are not going to infect their own systems by deliberately putting malware into code they are themselves using).
      (3) All software in the repositories is auditable by the 1.5 million + open source programmers of the world, and
      (4) Software transferred via the repositories is digitally signed.

      The performance effectiveness of this software distribution system can be gauged by the fact that (AFAIK) there has never been a recorded case of a Linux system getting a malware infection via the repositories/package management in the entire time that this system has been in common use.

      As for your assertion that "Its entirely possible for an OS running off a live cd can be exploited and be used as part of a botnet or to spread a virus for instance" ... I'd like you to give a "for instance". Remember that you can't write to a CD. Remember also that there are no Windows liveCDs, and all the zombie machines that are part of botnets are Windows machines.

    24. Re:It's sad... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Would be nice if their website at least told which OSes were affected...

      Considering my Vista is still running, I'll just assume "XP only" but who knows, it might hit me tomorrow. :(

    25. Re:It's sad... by raftpeople · · Score: 2

      That's why you should use an OS with capability based security so arbitrary code can't be executed.

    26. Re:It's sad... by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      If anyone running a Linux system simply adopts a self-imposed policy of "I will only install software from the repositories using the package management system" ... then their system is guaranteed to never get malware.
      Is that so?

    27. Re:It's sad... by Killer+Orca · · Score: 1

      Thank you for that hack, for some reason the AVG install discovered my last name and all the notifications I got were in Spanish, making them doubly annoying. Now it's all gone and I don't have to be eye-raped again.

    28. Re:It's sad... by CSMatt · · Score: 1

      Well there's always ClamWin, which uses the cross-platform ClamAV engine.

      Of course, ClamAV is primarily designed to target Windows viruses, as there are viruses for Windows than for other systems.

    29. Re:It's sad... by greg1104 · · Score: 1

      Been obvious they're circling the drain since the whole LinkScanner debacle

    30. Re:It's sad... by penguin+king · · Score: 1

      Surely it must be client side, or why do you care about the server's kitten?

    31. Re:It's sad... by ChrisMP1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How is that an error? Cats are fucking annoying.

      263 No More Kitten.

      --
      <sig>&nbsp;</sig>
    32. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If anyone running a Linux system simply adopts a self-imposed policy of "I will only install software from the repositories using the package management system" ... then their system is guaranteed to never get malware.
      Is that so?

      Yes it is so. You have not managed to find any instance of malware being installed on a user's Linux system via the repositories.

      For example, this is what happened to the Debian server:
      "The intruder had access to the server using a compromised developer account."

      That is not the same as:
      "Malware was installed on many user's systems via the repositories".

      What part of these stories of hackers managing to guess passwords on Red Hat, Gentoo or Debian development servers did you fail to understand?

    33. Re:It's sad... by armanox · · Score: 1

      In comparison, Avira's once a day popup isn't so bad.

      --
      I'm starting to think GNU is the problem with "GNU/Linux" these days.
    34. Re:It's sad... by darkpixel2k · · Score: 1

      After having read this, I think I may switch back to Avast.

      Really? After the gp said "It seems like AVG has gone massively downhill lately."?

      You must be the guy the campaign sign makers target.

      Vote for Kodos!

      Hmm...that sign makes a good point. I think I'll switch my vote to Kodos!

      --
      There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
    35. Re:It's sad... by nsheppar · · Score: 1

      Well, it's not really that bad. It went from being a good product to being just avg.

      --
      Correctness matters. Mercy matters more.
    36. Re:It's sad... by forgotten_my_nick · · Score: 1

      congrats on being the only search result for NO_MORE_KITTEN. :)

    37. Re:It's sad... by vacuum_tuber · · Score: 1

      My XP Pro 64-bit is still running and the file is still there, with no infection hits reported in recent days.

      --
      Look at the bright side: there's always seppuku.
    38. Re:It's sad... by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      The simple fact is that all viruses, malware, spyware and botnet zombie code runs on Windows machines.

      Well that's not a fact. This article at a Linux-friendly site has this citation:

      There are about 60,000 viruses known for Windows, 40 or so for the Macintosh, about 5 for commercial Unix versions, and perhaps 40 for Linux.

      This has nothing to do with obscurity of Linux systems. It has only to do with four things:
      (1) Installing Linux software using the package manager requires the local system administration password to be manually entered.

      That depends on the configuration. My Gnome desktop on Debian, for example, set up a password database that I unlock once, and I guess due to some choice I made when I first started using it, never again prompts for that session. That session being as long as I'm logged on, which is typically a week or two until Compiz has a spaz. Any program at all could grab the local admin password from the database and do whatever the hell it wanted without me ever knowing about it. Why aren't there any programs to do that? Because there's so few people running this setup that writing the code to do this would be a waste of time, despite how trivial it would be. It's very unlikely to ever end up running on an appropriate machine. That's purely because of obscurity though.

      (2) All software in the repositories is "visible" to the developers who put it there, and they use that software themselves (so they are not going to infect their own systems by deliberately putting malware into code they are themselves using).

      This is reasonable enough. Do bear in mind however that developers are often running development versions of code, and therefore not quite the same as the binary packages Joe User would be installing from their distro's repository. You're unlikely to have developers deliberating placing malicious code in the repositories, but it's possible their machines could be infected in some way and it could be snuck in.

      (3) All software in the repositories is auditable by the 1.5 million + open source programmers of the world, and

      True, but it still took a few years for a massive hole in Debian's SSL package to be discovered, which is used by a heck of a lot of people. While flaws in crypto are a particularly extreme case, it still shows that we can't just say "millions of eyeballs" and believe that'll solve all the problems.

      (4) Software transferred via the repositories is digitally signed.

      Yep, sure.

      The main thing is the difference in culture, and most Windows users will be very unhappy at having to restrict themselves to distro-supplied software. I do think this is a better system than "download some exe and run it", but it will take a long time to get that kind of culture shift. Still, Microsoft are working on an online store and I think that, in the very long, in order for Windows to remain a viable platform for the masses it will have to adopt a more modern approach to software management. Once people get used to "search for software, click to install, download, install, run" they'll find the "go to a store and buy a box" or "go to Google and search for stuff and hope you don't get malware" to be vastly inferior.

      Even using 100% repository software won't solve the problem, it'll just mean that bugs in software become the usual infection method rather than bugs in human operators.

      Lastly, using 100% repository software is often not an option. Especially if by that you mean "official repositories". Media codecs are still quite problematic due to laws restricting their use, and I suspect it's only going to get worse as people increasingly use these laws to help enforce copy protection mechanisms. Then there's software which is unlikely to end up in repositories, such a

    39. Re:It's sad... by Kleen13 · · Score: 1

      I have to say.... ya, I hate the popups, but so far Avira is batting 100% Knock on wood......

      --
      That sinking feeling deep in your gut when you KNOW you screwed up bad summed up with: {head desk} {head desk}
    40. Re:It's sad... by DarkEmpath · · Score: 1

      If I could kiss you, I would.

    41. Re:It's sad... by jez9999 · · Score: 1

      It seems like AVG has gone massively downhill lately.

      Aren't they actually discontinuing the free version now, anyway? I looked around for version 8 free, couldn't see one. That's when I told my dad to uninstall AVG and just not be an idiot when using the computer (he has Sygate firewall on there anyway, which is remarkably good at killing off Windows OS backdoor attacks).

    42. Re:It's sad... by LSD-OBS · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a fairly pervasive (and convincing) school of thought these days that argues against the use of anti-virus software entirely. The argument goes something like:

      AV software is nowhere near infallible. Therefore running AV software gives you a false sense of security while slowing your computer down. You're better off taking more effective precautions such as only installing reputable software, and keeping it up to date.

      --
      Today's weirdness is tomorrow's reason why. -- Hunter S. Thompson
    43. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why is there such a desire to try to make a dubious case that Linux is vulnerable to malware, when the plain simple fact is that Linux systems don't get malware? This is especially so when one adopts the simple policy ... "always install from the repositories".

      >There are about 60,000 viruses known for Windows, 40 or so for the Macintosh, about 5 for commercial Unix versions, and perhaps 40 for Linux.

      60,000 : 40 is damn close to "all". Close enough for the purposes of discussion. In any event, none of the 40 known pieces of malware for Linux (typically these are worms, not viruses, but we'll let that go) are currently active, out there "in the wild". None are effective against any moderately up-to-date Linux install.

      >That depends on the configuration. My Gnome desktop on Debian, for example

      How you set up your installation, and what risks you want to take, is entirely up to you.

      This has nothing to do with the veracity of the original claim, to whit ... "Installing Linux software using the package manager requires the local system administration password to be manually entered".

      That remains true for Linux installations no matter how risky **YOU** might want to run your installation.

      >True, but it still took a few years for a massive hole in Debian's SSL package to be discovered, which is used by a heck of a lot of people.

      It wasn't a "massive hole" ... it was a case of reduced (not absent, but reduced) security for the SSL layer.

      The error introduced wherein a well-meaning programmer "cleaned up" the Debian SSL code had no other visible effect at all. None whatsoever. No systems were compromised.

      It is remarkable then that this error (one can't really call it a bug when it results in no observable anomalies or behaviour) was picked up as soon as it was.

      Compare this to the case actually under discussion ... wherein someone has **deliberately tried** to get **malware** inserted into code to be distributed via repositories. That scenario is as different as night and day. There is just no way that deliberate malware would pass inspection. Remember that most FOSS submissions are culled because there is a better solution available in another submission. FOSS development is a "meritocracy". There is just no way that malware is going to be the most meritorious submission. There is no way to obscure a malware intent and have it pass consensus as being the best approach ... at the very least other "purists" and "code nazis" will "clean up" the submission to remove the obscurity ... no doubt removing the obscured malware in the process, even if the malware wasn't recognised as such.

      It just isn't credible. No malware is going to make it past the FOSS development process ... just not going to happen.

      > they do mean there's an exception to "only install from repositories".

      > There's also always the issue of the repository version being out of date.

      > Another issue is software that is not yet popular enough

      All of that simply doesn't address the point made.

      The point made was that, **IF** one actually **FOLLOWS** a **self-set** policy of "always install from the repository using the package manager" ... then one's Linux system will not get any malware.

      Argue against that point ... not some other ramble that you just made up to try to come up with something.

    44. Re:It's sad... by ShakaUVM · · Score: 1

      Actually, yeah. I used to like AVG, but now it's total shit.

      The latest version of AVG caused my system to grind to a halt and start crashing randomly. I don't know what it was doing, but if I tried to open many files quickly, my applications would crash. Probably something to do with their hooks which enable the scanning.

      I uninstalled it and my system started working perfectly again.

    45. Re:It's sad... by Gazzonyx · · Score: 1

      I've got it running on my primary desktop, but I decided this morning that if it hoses the install... it's only two weeks until Fedora 10 releases.

      --

      If I mod you up, it doesn't necessarily mean I agree with what you've said, sorry.

    46. Re:It's sad... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      Funny: I got tired of AVG's growing bloat and switched to Avast a few days ago. Good timing, even if serendipitous.

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    47. Re:It's sad... by TFGeditor · · Score: 1

      It went wa-aay south when they made the upgrade to version 8 (I think it was 8) mandatory. This version complains that AVG is broken if you disable resource-hogging Resident Shield, browser URL checking/security, and any of the other bloatware "improvements."

      AVG was pretty cool when it allowed the user to select only wanted features (email and on-demand or scheduled system scans). Now it is just another component of the Micromess Windows Suite.
       

      --
      Ignorance is curable, stupid is forever.
    48. Re:It's sad... by insane_machine · · Score: 1

      Don't forget to run a firewall to block unsolicited incoming traffic. Some flaws in one application will still get you with a worm then, if there is no patch out yet.

    49. Re:It's sad... by maxume · · Score: 1

      AVG has stopped distributing the bad definition file, so if it isn't already on your computer, it shouldn't be coming in. I guess they could make the same mistake again, but there is at least some chance that having made the mistake will make the more careful for awhile.

      Also, system files are protected differently in Vista, so it might not be a problem (It depends on how hard AVG works to overcome Windows):

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Resource_Protection

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    50. Re:It's sad... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 1

      Well, that's all good, but it still would have been nice to tell customers which OSes are affected. I don't think that's asking too much.

    51. Re:It's sad... by maxume · · Score: 1

      Sure. I was posting to alleviate your concerns, not to stick up for AVG.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    52. Re:It's sad... by sqlrob · · Score: 1

      What part of "reissued a package" did you miss?

    53. Re:It's sad... by Vampo · · Score: 1

      Who let the kitten out? The kitten should not be accessible. 363 No More Kitten

    54. Re:It's sad... by The+MAZZTer · · Score: 1

      Actually the network monitoring can't be completely turned off in 8, as I discovered.

      Even if you choose NOT to install those components at install time, a network driver is still installed and runs all the time. This driver causes random "Client timed out" errors in one of my favorite games, Team Fortress 2 (and possibly other Source-engine games).

      I completely disabled AVG at that point, and not only did the problem disappear, but I also got a significant performance boost from my PC (I had always wondered what was slowing it down all the time). When it STILL caused problems (with Word 2007 this time, I couldn't open ANY file) I just uninstalled it entirely. My system runs better than it did before.

      Of course, AVG never found anything anyway (I'm good at not downloading files from random websites). I think a non-invasive virus scanner will be good enough for me for the future (like ClamWin).

    55. Re:It's sad... by flyingfsck · · Score: 1

      ClamWin isn't too bad.

      --
      Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
    56. Re:It's sad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still running 7.5 on my computer and it still downloads the definition files daily. At least it looked like it was the couple of times I've actually seen it updating. It could be possible that they aren't releasing any updated definitions and just giving 7.5 versions an update containing no new definitions.

    57. Re:It's sad... by totally+bogus+dude · · Score: 1

      The point made was that, **IF** one actually **FOLLOWS** a **self-set** policy of "always install from the repository using the package manager" ... then one's Linux system will not get any malware.

      Argue against that point ... not some other ramble that you just made up to try to come up with something.

      Why argue against that? What point are you trying to make? There's a million ways I can self-cripple my use of the computer to make it perfectly safe no matter how stupid or naive I may be, as a user.

      If one actually follows a self-set policy of "always install software from trusted sources and verify your files weren't tampered with" on Windows, then one's Windows system will never get any malware.

      Again, who gives a shit? Actual users don't do this because it's too restrictive, or they don't really understand what it means, and they're easily mislead and distracted by the promise of awesome animated cursors or free emoticons or whatever. Nobody targets Linux for malware because virtually the entire userbase is more savvy than "regular users" and won't run some arbitrary attachment in the first place. But claiming this makes Linux immune to this vector of attack is completely missing the point.

      Most Windows users nowadays run as an unprivileged account. Malware is still a huge problem for these users because, as it turns out, you can do lots of annoying shit without requiring root or administrator privileges.

      The problem with Windows has never been Windows itself. Sure, there are some things Microsoft could have done better in order to make it slightly harder to attack, but ultimately as long as you're letting the user have control of the system it's going to be vulnerable. The kind of user that receives a link for an ePostcard, follows it and then runs the .exe it downloads will do exactly the same thing on Linux or MacOS X or FreeBSD or OpenSolaris. Not letting you execute things by default doesn't matter, because the website will just have instructions for enabling the execute bit and user will follow that in order to view their postcard.

      Advocating for a distribution that prevents you from running any programs or scripts which didn't come from an official repository would be a way to solve this problem. It would also severely hamper the usability of the system, especially for "power users" who want to write their own scripts; so you'd have to be able to disable it. Which means Joe User can disable it by following the instructions on the helpful ePostcard website.

  4. not what it seems by savuporo · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is actually a patch that they tried to roll out to fix Ubuntu bug #1, a great stride forward too.

    --
    http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.slashdot.org Errors found while checking this document as HTML5!
    1. Re:not what it seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      Naw, the patch that was released was called Windows Vista.

    2. Re:not what it seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't tell me ... you can crash Ubuntu's launchpad with a slashdot?

    3. Re:not what it seems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That bug was fixed by Bernard.

      OK, I gave this another thought and I came to the conclusion that we should all switch back to Windows and I'll tell you why.

      If we all go to our local computer store, buy the latest Windows edition and install it on our computers then this will bring lots of cash into Microsoft's money bags. But as we all know, this money will not be used for research or the development of new bloatware. No! All the money will go directly to the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and they will use it to help Africa. Let these guys save the world, I have enough problems in my own life. Hence, if Bill & Melinda can do all these good deeds and raise the level of income in Africa then this will prevent South African entrepreneurs from flooding global markets with unbeatably cheap (or even free) products

    4. Re:not what it seems by againjj · · Score: 1
  5. Re:Sucks to be on windows.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.apple.com/support/downloads/

    security updates

    Riiiiiiiiight

  6. I haven't been hit yet... by bogaboga · · Score: 1

    ...how do I shield myself from the hit, potentially causing headache? Do not recommend Linux for it's "not there yet." I will give KDE a few more years.

    By the way, AVG will never auto-update on any system of mine! But when I update manually, all goes well. Do they (AVG) just want to frustrate me in the hope that I will abandon my "free" AVG? If that's what they think, they are doomed!

    1. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by couchslug · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "Do not recommend Linux for it's "not there yet." I will give KDE a few more years."

      It would appear that certain free AV software is also "not there yet". :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    2. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by Animaether · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you haven't been hit yet, then you probably won't be either; your AVG quite likely already has the fixed definitions file.

      If you -are- hit... guess what? it pops up a warning that it believes it found some sort of trojan in user32.dll . Laymen might just tell it to remove the thing, but I do hope -you- would know better and tell it to stfu and ignore, then fetch the latest update (it will warn you a few more times if you've got the resident shield runnning, as user32.dll gets accessed a lot).

      If you -are- hit and it has already removed it... quickly restore it, carry on.

      If you are hit, it has removed it, and your machine has already crashed... reboot to a command prompt (safe mode MAY work, but it didn't when I fixed a machine on sunday), restore user32.dll from a cache / restore point. If you can't get it from a cache, get it from the installation CD (if you have one), but keep in mind that it will be missing updates and windows update might not realize that (as everything else on the system tells it hotfixes N-M have been installed - maybe MS will make the update check the MD5 or something of user32.dll, after this problem, just in case).

      This was extremely stupid on the end of AVG, but then I'm still baffled why such files can be removed at all; same with ntldr. If you accidentally wipe your root dir, you're all kinds of f'ed.

    3. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by narcberry · · Score: 1

      ...how do I shield myself from the hit?

      Sorry, you can only raise your AC and hope that's enough.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    4. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by guyminuslife · · Score: 1

      Yes. Give KDE a few more years to come out with KDE 5, break everything all over again, and insist that they'll be ready for prime time in another few years.

      --
      I don't believe in time. It's a grand conspiracy designed to sell watches.
    5. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      "If you accidentally wipe your root dir, you're all kinds of f'ed."

      Yeah, I'd be offline for a few minutes.
      I'd have to boot from live CD or USB key, and eventually reinstall after backing up my home directory and whatever else I want to save.

      Inconvenienced? Slightly.

      F'd? Nope. :)

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    6. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by codepunk · · Score: 1

      It is not there yet? I don't have to run anti virus on my Linux box and therefore do not have to worry about some crapware removing my system binaries. Oh yea it could not remove them anyway unless I ran said crapware virus scanner as root.

      I may run Windows some day, but it just is not there yet!

      --


      Got Code?
    7. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by nevermore94 · · Score: 1

      The most important thing ... with any virus software ... is to make sure you have it set to "Ask me before removing threats" and NOT "Remove all threats automatically". That way you get to make the final choice about what gets deleted and you can avoid any false positives from destroying anything important.

      I now run AVG on both of my systems and have never had it delete anything. Previously, I have had both McAfee and Norton find false positives and want to delete things that I knew were safe. So, false positives are nothing unique to AVG, although this was a particularly bad blunder.

      --
      Nevermore.
    8. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "but then I'm still baffled why such files can be removed at all;"

      because a virus could be injected in such files?

    9. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by Machtyn · · Score: 1

      My copy of AVG also fails to auto-update about half the time.

    10. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by rdnetto · · Score: 1

      I do hope -you- would know better and tell it to stfu and ignore

      Except that because it is a standard windows DLL, it is extremely likely that it would be infected, or a virus would have the same name. Just like how heaps of viruses are called svchost.exe because Windows normally runs around 6 different copies of it.

      --
      Most human behaviour can be explained in terms of identity.
    11. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by OcotilloScott · · Score: 1

      I though UAC was supposed to be the thing that prevented/stalled you long enough to NOT delete a system file like this? Not that anyone here is running Vista with UAC turned on... Then again...not that anyone's running Vista anyways...

    12. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by B3ryllium · · Score: 1

      Why raise your AC when you could just open a few Windows?

      (Maybe this is just my Canadian bias showing, and the fact that it's almost winter ...)

    13. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by mspohr · · Score: 1

      From the weekly stories about Windows problems, I would have to conclude that it is "Not there yet."

      --
      I don't read your sig. Why are you reading mine?
    14. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by greengrass · · Score: 1

      "Do not recommend Linux for it's "not there yet." I will give KDE a few more years."

      Forget it, Fanboy! Linux will never catch up with MS's ability to run malware.

      --
      The MS "no sue/patent deal" with Novell/Xandros is like the Pope blessing a Jewish wedding
    15. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps it can be removed because "Anti-Virus" companies rely on low level Windows functionality that allows them to hook into the kernel, delete open files, and take other low level actions. This kind of shit is why the anti-virus vendors get all angry and sad when Microsoft starts talking about Kernel Patch Protection. Because these people need to keep us safe by hooking all kinds of hooks (dragging down system performance) and by reducing your system stability. It's also why the anti-virus companies talk shit on Windows UAC, Kernel Patch Protection, NX bit and software DEP, ASLR, the priviledge separation efforts underway in the Windows services, Internet Explorer's protected mode, etc etc etc. They need to keep you afraid of Windows, even as Windows' security track record improves more and more over the years. Their worst fear is that through their evolutionary and plodding ways, Microsoft will eventually achieve a relatively secure Windows and that people won't be afraid anymore.

      I run Windows Vista 32bit with UAC enabled. I use a non-administrator account and escalate to UAC when installing software or changing system settings. I rarely see the UAC dialog because I rarely do anything that would trigger the UAC dialog. My Vista networking is configured for home network so I have some ports open, but I'm behind a basic Netgear cable router, so I have basic NAT. I browse the web with Internet Explorer 7. I have no anti-virus or anti-spyware software running in real-time on my workstation. And yet somehow, despite all of this, I am not owned. I have no viruses or spyware installed on my system, I'm not getting hacked by websites I visit, nor am I getting viruses through email. These are pretty much the only reasonable open vectors on my system. My Internet Explorer's protected mode and a combination of my email hosting provider's anti-virus scanning, Outlook's extension filtering, and my own common sense, keep me from getting infected.

      Now, I'm actually a developer (C/C++/C#) and something of a power user. But I've learned to use Windows within the bounds of a non-admin account, and in doing so, I've had a much smoother experience, something akin to the smooth sailing that Macintosh users generally report. I've found that most people who get owned are running XP as Administrator, and most people who have fucked up computers, fucked up their computer with their own hands under Administrator access.

      Try it. Run Vista as non-administrator. Leave UAC enabled, and if it triggers alot, as yourself what the hell you're doing to trigger it so much? Run IE7 with protected mode on (and petition Firefox to take advantage of Protected Mode and/or privilege separation). As long as you have a reasonable NAT router in place and aren't opening HAPPY_FUN_TIMES.EXE, you won't get owned, and you won't lose 25% of the performance of that hot new computer you just bought.

      BT

    16. Re:I haven't been hit yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What is the latest fixed definitions file?

  7. Should have gone for the gold... by phmadore · · Score: 5, Funny

    Should have gone for the gold, marked Explorer.exe and iExplore...

    1. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      del config.sys

    2. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Anpheus · · Score: 5, Funny

      You haven't used Microsoft software in a while, have you?

    3. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by cazbar · · Score: 1

      I should think losing iexplore.exe would be a benefit.

    4. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by negRo_slim · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      On the Oregon Cost born and raised, On the beach is where I spent most of my days
    5. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by msuarezalvarez · · Score: 2, Funny

      The list time I installed an OS from MS, it had a CONFIG.SYS file... What do they use nowadays?

    6. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by techno-vampire · · Score: 1

      I was thinking roughly the same thing, but I would have suggested having the user delete kernel32.dll, then reboot "to make sure your changes take effect."

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    7. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by hey · · Score: 1

      The Registry, I suppose.

    8. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Explorer is actually one of the few things I like about Windows. It's better than any Linux alternative (Nautilus, et al) and way better than the POS known as Finder.

      This coming from someone who doesn't even run Windows except in VMware.

    9. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by initialE · · Score: 1

      %windir%\system32\config.nt for dos level compatibility

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    10. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by VShael · · Score: 1

      The list time I installed an OS from MS, it had a CONFIG.SYS file... What do they use nowadays?

      I don't know about "use" but my XP system still has a Config.sys file in C:\
      As well as IO.sys and MSDOS.sys and autoexec.bat

    11. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you upgraded from an earlier version that had it, and it wasn't deleted.

    12. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Negative.

      I have a new(ish) 64bit IBM IntelliStation Pro that has never had anything but XP-64 on it. It still has the above mentioned files.

      Please insert credit(s) to continue.

      --
      -
    13. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Hillgiant · · Score: 1

      Not as much as you would think.... Windows help system is based on iexplore.exe

      Help in windows is pretty useless, but help in some of my applications is occasionally required. Stupid, pointless, anti-trust integration.

      --
      -
    14. Re:Should have gone for the gold... by Anpheus · · Score: 1

      It may be capable of dual booting into a DOS environment as part of the OEM kit. As you may know, 16-bit software does not run under any 64-bit version of a Windows OS, and Windows XP was the first 'home' Windows release that did not feature a DOS subsystem. (Windows ME made it harder to get to, but that's neither here nor there.)

  8. hugsforhackers? hugsforusers if you use AVG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AVG: Tough on hackers. Tougher on you

  9. downhill since 7.5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    IMO it has definitely gone down hill since 7.5; remember being able to run in CLI?
    I had (at one time, when I was a break/fix tech) everything set to run silent install, clean everything and spit out a log thereafter... but since 8 came out, that's only for pro! ... nice AVG, enjoy your declining market share in the "crap av" category.

  10. nothing of value by roman_mir · · Score: 1

    and nothing of value has been lost

  11. Hah finally by sleeponthemic · · Score: 1

    Flagging the OS as a virus.

    Pretty soon you'll click heal and your box will immediately start downloading something much more wholesome

    --
    I record my sleeptalking
    1. Re:Hah finally by LingNoi · · Score: 1

      Seeming as distrowatch refuses to list Ubuntu: Satanic Edition, but happily allows Muslim and Christian editions of Ubuntu I guess they're going to need the numbers.

  12. Setting itself apart from other software by LoadWB · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Damn. This is what I was hoping would never happen to AVG. After reading all the times that McAfee, Norton, and others had removed Office documents, Windows DLLs, and Office DLLs, I always had a smug chuckle available.

    But now. Ah, well. Four years, 300 workstations, a dozen or more managed installations and still not a single infection or major problem for me using AVG.

    1. Re:Setting itself apart from other software by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Are you sure that's not just because AVG doesn't detect some viruses? As I mentioned elsewhere, my sister's computer was running AVG, but it had dozens of viruses that I could only remove by installing Avast (though to be honest I ended up reformatting anyway). I used to recommend AVG but in the last two years or so I've been recommending Avast.

    2. Re:Setting itself apart from other software by LoadWB · · Score: 1

      Perfectly clean systems. AVG v8 also has much better scanning engines, and I have used v8 solely to clean systems on which other software packages, including Avast, could not clean, let alone even start running.

      Although, WinAntiVirus XP 2009 64 keeps telling me that these systems have over 20,000 infections.

    3. Re:Setting itself apart from other software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      SmugChuckle is my new favorite distro.........

    4. Re:Setting itself apart from other software by black_lbi · · Score: 1

      Well, you were lucky. I had a virus on my usb drive ... (something that changed autorun.inf, i didn't bother to write down the name). So i was sure that something was wrong, but AVG was saying everything's ok ...
      I tried to check the file with Kaspersky's online virus scanner. Like i suspected it was a trojan of some sorts.
      I tried avast!, clam-av and avira (I'm cheap like that), and only avira recognized the file as being a virus.

    5. Re:Setting itself apart from other software by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ditto on all, 'cept 2 years, and nearly 1000 workstations. Alas, sigh.

  13. Isn't this ... by Riot.ATL · · Score: 1

    ... a good thing?

    </flamebait>

  14. Maybe they should test it on Windows? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, I can understand that they develop their scanner on a different OS, but they really should test it on Windows, since that is what it is supposed to run on.

    Clearly their QA process is totally non-existent.

  15. I'm not surprised... by gravyface · · Score: 1

    We use the non-free edition on several of our customers' SBS 2003 servers and noticed that one of their updates had put the machine in a "AVG has been updated. Please reboot now" loop and Exchange's Information Store service wasn't running/couldn't start. Had to disable the scanner key in the registry so Exchange would start. Then had to download a utility to fix the update files to bring AVG back to a stable state.

    Also had another issue where ICS was suddenly enabled and failing on the server; traced that back to AVG as well.

    We're looking for another low-cost, low-bloat anti-malware solution to migrate our clients to once their licenses expire.

    --
    body massage!
    1. Re:I'm not surprised... by HeronBlademaster · · Score: 1

      Just a bit of advice - I'd stay away from BitDefender. They gave us a great price, but their software caused all sorts of network issues - one of our domain controllers started intermittently losing network connectivity for no reason whatsoever (I had to reformat the server to fix it). We had DNS and WINS resolution issues for weeks after installing BitDefender. Various applications wouldn't work. Their management tools don't always work correctly.

      We ended up getting a prorated refund; we're going to buy Avast this week instead. I use Avast on my personal laptop; I love it, and haven't had any significant performance degradation. (For improved performance, turn off VRDB generation.) Avast integrates with e-mail clients (including Outlook and Thunderbird) and I think it can integrate itself with instant messenger and peer-to-peer clients as well, but I don't use that feature.

    2. Re:I'm not surprised... by Donniedarkness · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's by no means low cost, but I do have to say that I love NOD32. It's worth the extra money to not have to worry.

      --
      Earn a % of cash back from Newegg, Tiger Direct, Walmart.com, and more: http://www.mrrebates.com?refid=458505
    3. Re:I'm not surprised... by minvaren · · Score: 1

      We went to Avast! Managed to get away from SAV. We run mainly older desktops (P3 933, 256MB), so every bit of free memory helps. Avast uses around 20MB, unlike nearly every one of it's competitors.

      As my environment isn't yours, though - try it out for a few first.

      --
      Big! Strong! Wow! Tada-O!
    4. Re:I'm not surprised... by GravityStar · · Score: 1

      You may want to evaluate Avira: http://www.avira.com/en/products/index.html

      I use the free personal edition, and am quite satisfied with it. YMMV

  16. Wasn't AVG a "dangerous" program, recently? by ivi · · Score: 1

    I seem to recall reading reports / rumors of AVG being a dangerous product, at the latest major version release (was it 7.0?).

    At that point, we removed it, but still have one computer trying to run it, but (hopefully) unable to do so, due to a missing AVG DLL file (deleted, with others, when manual remove wouldn't work).

    Who would use a program, with such a recent (alleged) history of infecting computers, rather than protecting them? :-/

    1. Re:Wasn't AVG a "dangerous" program, recently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't know about "dangerous", but it does suffer from an annoyingly high number of false positives. I've not seen any other issues with it, but that's often enough.

    2. Re:Wasn't AVG a "dangerous" program, recently? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have seen imposter programs claiming to be AVG products. AVG itself identified them as viruses.

  17. Arrr! by gbutler69 · · Score: 1

    Avast yee scurvy dogs!

    --
    Over-the-top Response Guy! Giving "Over-the-Top Responses" since 1970.
    1. Re:Arrr! by mhall119 · · Score: 0

      No, Avast yee scurvy virii.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    2. Re:Arrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, Avast ye scurvy viruses, dammit! Not everything that looks vaguely latin should be pluralized with an i, and most certainly nothing should be pluralized by changing the word-final "us" to "ii"! You're just a dumbass trying to look educated, and failing miserably. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/virus

    3. Re:Arrr! by meringuoid · · Score: 0, Redundant
      No, Avast yee scurvy virii.

      No, Avast ye scurvy viruses.

      --
      Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
    4. Re:Arrr! by mhall119 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Right, because Pirates are known for proper spelling and pronunciation. Can you see a pirate trying to pronoun viruses? I didn't think so.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    5. Re:Arrr! by mhall119 · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Right, because Pirates are known for proper spelling and pronunciation. Can you see a pirate trying to pronoun viruses? I didn't think so.

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    6. Re:Arrr! by Jarjarthejedi · · Score: 1

      I don't know, if you say it with a Captain Barbosa voice viruses actually sounds pretty good...

      --
      There are two kinds of fool One says 'This is old therefore good' Another says 'This is new therefore better'- Dean Ing
    7. Re:Arrr! by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      you can't get people to stop using 'virii' anymore than you can get them to stop using 'm$' or 'all your base' references. it's the internet - lighten the fuck up.

      also, you're giving language tips to someone typing in a pirate accent...

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    8. Re:Arrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      That should be Pirii, not Pirates.

    9. Re:Arrr! by mhall119 · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, it's Pirates, dammit! Now I'm going to lecture you about the proper pluralization of latin sounding words because I think you're a dumbass trying to look educated, there is no way you would make a common mistake for comedic value. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/humor

      --
      http://www.mhall119.com
    10. Re:Arrr! by vawarayer · · Score: 1

      If only I had 10cents everytime I wanted to tell someone to be polite.

    11. Re:Arrr! by Atario · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not everything that looks vaguely latin should be pluralized with an i

      No, but it's fun.

      I suppose next you're going to object to "VAXen" and "boxen"?

      Get off my damn lawn.

      --
      "A great democracy must be progressive or it will soon cease to be a great democracy." --Theodore Roosevelt
    12. Re:Arrr! by penguinchris · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Use of "boxen" is actually really annoying to many people, including myself; and honestly, at least for me, when I see that it lowers my opinion of whoever wrote it. The impression it gives me is that the author is trying to sound cool to people who are computer geeks, but the kind of geek that mods their computer so it looks cool and runs the latest game quickly, not the kind that's actually interested in the inner workings of the system.

      So that's my problem with it - I know other people say "boxen" as well, but it seems like the kind of thing that is most often used in the group described above. That this is a negative connotation for me I guess would imply that I'm an elitist of sorts, but that's not it; I'm just not into the same kind of thing. That's just not the kind of geek I am and I sometimes regret being found guilty by association with that group by people who don't know me well but can tell I'm a geek.

      Of course, I'm also the kind of person who gets annoyed at most all improper grammar usage. The "Its/It's" problem so many people have is one of the worst.

      On the other hand, I don't mind "virii" that much; I know it's incorrect but it's not so much of a stretch as "boxen". I agree, it's fun, when used in the right context. A story about popular anti-virus software running amok definitely counts as the right context.

      Also, while I do use them quite frequently myself, I don't get too concerned about proper comma and semicolon usage, so please no comments about that if I've done something wrong in that regard :)

    13. Re:Arrr! by mrbcs · · Score: 4, Funny
      Use of "boxen" is actually really annoying to many people, including myself; and honestly,

      Well, better than my slip up. I was working at an office with a secretary. She was showing me around the place, where the machines were etc. We had finished and needed to get back to her station to fix her system. Guess what I said without even thinking?

      "Well I guess we should go now and take a look at your box." She laughed pretty hard.
      I couldn't believe that I said that.

      --
      I'm not anti-social, I'm anti-idiot.
    14. Re:Arrr! by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Well, eventually you'll get old, and some phrase you thought was cool when you were young will piss off some young grammer nazi, and then Total Consciousness will be yours.

      Says the guy who remembers when an 11/780 was pretty fucking cool.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    15. Re:Arrr! by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      Heh, at least she has a sense of humor; it's funny too that she even knew what that meant in the anatomical sense (I'm imagining a typical middle-aged secretary, obviously that could be wrong.)

      Now I'm really going to sound like an ass, but calling a computer a "box" in the first place has always bothered me, so of course I don't like "boxen" either :)

      I guess I'm somewhat out of place here; I love computers, run linux exclusively and know a lot of the inner workings, but in real life I'm actually a science nerd (and grad student) so I don't fit in with slashdot's predominantly computer science/IT culture (of course I know science is a big deal around here too, but it's not the main focus.)

      That's my excuse for criticizing common IT slang :)

    16. Re:Arrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, Avast ye scurvy viruses, dammit!

      There's no such thing as "viruses", just there's no "mouses". "Virus" is the plural for "virua".

      Other commonly confused words include "bus", the plural of "bue", "adress" for "adreso" (tricky one!). Not many people know or use those words correct hence the mess we're in.

      But some words are catching up faster than others, such as the popular "yes", which is the plural of "yea".

    17. Re:Arrr! by penguinchris · · Score: 1

      I completely agree, I'm sure that would happen - if I used "cool" phrases at all. I'm sure I seem like a square among people I talk to, and I know by writing this I'm going to sound like a jerk, but I actually feel really awkward using trendy phrases and slang so I don't do it. I don't even like calling people by nicknames. It's uncomfortable for me.

      Now, I consider this to be something of a problem; I'm not saying I'm better than people who use cool phrases - in fact I wish I was able to do so more easily! I think this actually has the same effect you predict, except I don't have to wait to get old, where young(er) "trendiness nazis" are annoyed at my language usage. It certainly has made for many awkward conversations.

      I know you're being sarcastic in your post (while letting in an amount of meanness appropriate to the level of jerkiness found in my original post) so please don't take this the wrong way. I'm taking the time to defend myself against a sarcastic attack only because this is something I think about a lot; on the one hand I'm glad I never fell into the trap of using too much slang most young people have, on the other I wish I didn't sound like such a dork when I talk to people :)

    18. Re:Arrr! by badfish99 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You obviously never learned Latin, or you would know the correct declension of the noun "bus", as given here

    19. Re:Arrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but if you meet one alone, it's a Piratis.

    20. Re:Arrr! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I can't be the only one waiting to hear the rest of the story...

    21. Re:Arrr! by Alpha830RulZ · · Score: 1

      Ah, Grasshopper, you worry so much. My sarcasm was meant in a friendly way. There is no need for defense, because no attack was intended.

      --
      I was taught to respect my elders. The trouble is, it's getting harder and harder to find some.
    22. Re:Arrr! by E++99 · · Score: 1

      No, Avast ye scurvy viruses, dammit! Not everything that looks vaguely latin should be pluralized with an i, and most certainly nothing should be pluralized by changing the word-final "us" to "ii"! You're just a dumbass trying to look educated, and failing miserably. http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/virus

      I propose we foil the wet blankets, such as the parent, by referring to the singular as a "virius" instead of a "virus." These are the battles upon which the evolution of language is based!

    23. Re:Arrr! by E++99 · · Score: 1

      Use of "boxen" is actually really annoying to many people, including myself; and honestly, at least for me, when I see that it lowers my opinion of whoever wrote it. The impression it gives me is that the author is trying to sound cool to people who are computer geeks, but the kind of geek that mods their computer so it looks cool and runs the latest game quickly, not the kind that's actually interested in the inner workings of the system.

      I always get a kick out of the word "boxen" and make a mental note to use the term myself (which I promptly lose). It never occurred to me the example of "oxen" in English; I've always though of it as the simulation of a native German speaker making a mistake on the pluralization... for the reason that it just sounds better than "boxes". (I suppose "ox" must have come to English via German.)

  18. Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .... by whoever57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That's going to be fun for the millions of PC users who did not get a Windows CD with their PC and did not bother to burn a re-install CD.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  19. It's done this before.. by Rob+from+RPI · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been using AVG at customers sites since version 6.. It has, over the years, deleted entire outlook pst's, repeatedly uninstalled VNC servers and radmin, and generally been grumpy for the slightest reason.

    I am a sucker for punishment, because I still keep using it. It's just as good as the rest, it's half the price, and noticably faster than all the others I've tried.

    I think that, however, the entire concept of antivirus is going to have to fail, and we'll need a whitelist, rather than a blacklist.

    There has been quite a bit of discussion about this over the years, and it's going to come true.

    Oh. And as an added bonus, Slashdot is screwing up my display. When I load the page, I get the comments page, and then it clears and I get a spammy IBM flash ad of some sort. Serves me right for not installing ABP after a reinstall.

    --Rob

    1. Re:It's done this before.. by bheer · · Score: 1

      I recommend AVG to people who don't want to pay for antivirus. Despite the rap it gets on /. it's way better than McAfee/Norton.

      For those who can pay for antivirus, check out Eset's NOD32. Simple, stays out of your way and has some seriously impressive reviews.

    2. Re:It's done this before.. by narcberry · · Score: 1

      Good luck implementing your "white list".

      What happens when, inevitably, another problem occurs? Do you clear your white list and start building a list of "trusted" websites all over again?

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    3. Re:It's done this before.. by initialE · · Score: 1

      whitelisting would be the nightmare that we are all fearing - think of it as the application of trusted computing and you'll see why. Imagine never being able to compile and distribute your own programs without the compliance of a major antivirus provider.

      --
      Starbucks, Harbuckle of Breath.
    4. Re:It's done this before.. by magarity · · Score: 1

      The whitelist would be of executables, not websites. If a website wants to launch a thread outside the normal display features of a browser, that needs extreme scrutiny. A whitelist would be the easy way to do this, both for web apps and locally installed software. Now, the problem of who and how makes/approves such a whitelist of websites wanting to execute jobs is another matter...

    5. Re:It's done this before.. by OneSmartFellow · · Score: 1

      completely ignoring ClamAV - which I use - haven't had a single virus in years

    6. Re:It's done this before.. by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

      repeatedly uninstalled VNC servers and radmin

      G@# FU@34N6 D#@# IT that make my day so... goddamned... frustrating. We use RAdmin, and while I understand that it could theoretically be used to hijack a computer, so could SMB and RDP, but does it disable those? I have put in so many service requests to AVG about this and they tell me the same thing every time, which is "sorry, fuck you." I even sent them screenshots of the AVG files in the exceptions window with the "any location" option checked, and an AVG window popped up in front of that with one of the files in the background exceptions window telling me it found malicious software. "Sorry, we can't recreate this problem, fuck you." I used to tell people to install AVG all the time, but now my face turns red when somebody utters those hellspawned letters.

    7. Re:It's done this before.. by maxume · · Score: 1

      Imagine if the whitelist was a system feature under user control (it would be a pain in the ass in a lot of situations (parents, etc.), but it wouldn't be 'scary' the way you are talking about).

      This is essentially what permissions on unix do by the way, the system looks if the file has been marked as executable before running it, rather than doing everything it can to execute the file when it is clickety-clicked.

      The parent situation could be alleviated by subscribing them to a vendor whitelist, but it wouldn't need to be the only whitelist, there could be more than one.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
    8. Re:It's done this before.. by narcberry · · Score: 1

      And the users of most computers will still click "yes" when prompted.

      "Add 'registryspy' to your list of approved services?"

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
  20. Hype by dr_strang · · Score: 1

    I use their 7.5 network scanner system with the TCP server and didn't have a single machine on the network (50+) go down.

    I don't know if that's good or bad.

    --
    This is a sig. It is like every other sig in the world, except that it is mine, and it is different.
  21. Re:Sucks to be on windows.. by mrsteveman1 · · Score: 1

    They make AV software for OS X you just choose not to install it. That is the difference.

  22. Oh so the real truth comes out by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Funny

    Windows really is a virus and not an operating system. The user32.dll file is the one that phones home to Microsoft and has that "NSA Backdoor" in it.

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Oh so the real truth comes out by Binkleyz · · Score: 1
    2. Re:Oh so the real truth comes out by narcberry · · Score: 1

      It won't be just an NSA backdoor for long. But it's ok, we might be terrorists, so better safe then sorry.

      --
      Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
    3. Re:Oh so the real truth comes out by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Yeah good one but TFA talked about Windows XP having the user32.dll virus and not Windows Vista.

      Even 12 year olds who use Google as a research tool for Junior High Computer Papers know that much. :)

      BTW Tin Foil hats don't work, I use Lead foil hats, they block the gamma radiation used by alpha waves the CIA uses via the Remote Viewing exercises invented by Dr. Doom er ah Claude Van Dam, er Whatshisname

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    4. Re:Oh so the real truth comes out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shoot yourself, preferably in the mouth.

    5. Re:Oh so the real truth comes out by Binkleyz · · Score: 1

      Noted.. But my point (and the overall point of the article, as I read it) was that it appears that only conspiracy theorists believe that the NSA (or whoever) had backdoor hooks into M$-published DLLs.

      To be honest, I seriously doubt they'd bother, as there are always people looking in the code for exactly that sort of thing. In contrast (and this is my own tin foil hat moment), I have little (really none) doubt that the NSA can find out literally anything about anyone if they choose to.. If they really wanted to know what was on your computer or your network connection, they'd simply tap your connection and do a black-bag op to clone your hard drive for examination (at their leisure) by their acres (see "The NSA doesn't measure computers in computing power; it measures them in acres. That's how they talk about their computers: how many acres of computers they have. ... We're talking about millions of processors that can work on a single problem simultaneously. The amount of computing power is phenomenal. It's just staggering." of computers.

    6. Re:Oh so the real truth comes out by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Actually I was joking, the FBI and NSA and CIA doesn't need a back door in any operating system.

      Not when they have Carnivore at every ISP, and Magic Lantern to back it up.

      Offically they don't use those technologies anymore, unoffically they developed better more high tech versions and stopped using the old versions in 2000, and classified it as Top Secret Magestic Level so that only Members of Congress and the President know about it, but cannot tell the public about it.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  23. Calm down by whitehatlurker · · Score: 1
    Yeah, it's false positive, and one that should have been caught well before the update was made. So? I have an F-Secure version that insists Adobe Acroreader is part of some kind of nefarious plot, and has for several releases of their update files.

    Pretty much every AV software has had false positives. This one is somewhat funny in that this false positive hit an important part of MicroSoft's operating system, but if it weren't for that, this would not be newsworthy.

    If people didn't react with such a vigorous knee-jerk when their software detects a "virus" (ZOMG! burn the computer - it's InFeCTed!), things would be better. I like how TFA suggests disconnecting your computer so that AVG can't update ...

    --
    .. paranoid crackpot leftover from the days of Amiga.
    1. Re:Calm down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      when several people within my family suddenly are left without a functional computer (blue screen reboot cycle), and i am the only one in the family able to fix it (or has to talk people through it on the phone), then i'd say it is newsworthy, i dont care that it nukes a part of MS's OS (OMG WINDUZ IS TEH VIR0RZ!!!11!1one), i care that somehow it disables computers without warning, leaving me (and countless other geeks) to do massive clean-up.

      a simple update wrecking hundreds of thousands (possibly milions) of computers is newsworthy.

      Thats what i hate about being the only geek in the family, even when ive left windows behind myself (except on the workfloor, but there, sysadmining isnt my job/responsibility), i still get to clean up the crap everytime something major hits windows-land

  24. We've had our eye on you for sometime now... by HangingChad · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd like to share a revelation that I've had during my time here. It came to me when I tried to classify your operating systems and I realized that you're not actually cross platform. Every OS on this planet instinctively develops a natural equilibrium with the surrounding community but you Windows users do not. You move to a hardware manufacturer and you multiply and multiply until every desktop is consumed and the only way you can survive is to spread to another OEM. There is another organism on this planet that follows the same pattern. Do you know what it is? A virus. Windows is a disease, a cancer of this planet.

    You're a plague and AVG is the cure.

    --
    That's our life, the big wheel of shit. - The Fat Man, Blue Tango Salvage
    1. Re:We've had our eye on you for sometime now... by OldManAndTheC++ · · Score: 1

      Agent Smith: How can you scream if you don't have a mouth?

      Steve Ballmer: Mmmph! Mmphmmph!!

      Delicious.

      --
      Soylent Green is peoplicious!
  25. How does stuff like this happen? by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    I always wonder how things like this happen.

    One has to assume that after the final release of the update was built... that nobody in SQA ever tried it out, even once.

    Is there any other possible explanation?

    1. Re:How does stuff like this happen? by Culture20 · · Score: 1

      [...] nobody in SQA ever tried it out, even once.
      Is there any other possible explanation?

      Maybe: SQA could have tested it many times, with every version of Windows, but this could signal a widespread infection of user32.dll that AVG correctly identified, but incorrectly corrected. I consider this scenario equally likely, especially with a windows worm 'sploit out there that I _know_ some people didn't patch the vulnerability to until the first, second, or third coffee shop they visited.

    2. Re:How does stuff like this happen? by jabithew · · Score: 1

      Thank you! That's what I was thinking! Yet nobody has asked this key question until here. How the fuck did this update get out of the door?

      And why doesn't the software maintain a do-not-delete list of key system files? Granted they may get infected, but deleting user32.dll can only result in a situation as bad or worse than any potential virus. There can be no circumstance when deleting it can make sense.

      --
      All intents and purposes. Not intensive purposes.
  26. It's official, AVG suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Since that whole URL-checker-let's-DDOS-the-internet update I switched to the far superior Avira for my windows boxen and am now feeling smugly vindicated.

    (www.avira.com)

  27. That explains it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was getting worried about my DSL connection running so much faster and so much less spam...

  28. Virus checker with an autoimmune disease by coolsnowmen · · Score: 1

    I wonder if you could give windows an autoimmune disease by crafting specialized virus payloads that look sufficiently like important system files to a virus checker. If you really understood how virus checkers try to match a virus signature to a class of computer viri, then one might be able to do it. Just a thought.
     

  29. Stopped using AVG at version 8 by Smidge204 · · Score: 1

    When version 8 came out I refused to update, having already read some complaints about it. When the current version stopped updating, I just uninstalled it. AVG was what I recommended to everyone who asked back when it was version 6... how far they've fallen.

    Point of discussion: What are some decent alternatives that Slashdotters have employed? I've moved on to Avast! but I'm sure there's more out there. Bonus if it's freeware.
    =Smidge=

    1. Re:Stopped using AVG at version 8 by MtViewGuy · · Score: 1

      I'm using Norton Internet Security 2008 on my current PC and actually find it fast, stable and works quite well. It appears Synmantec learned their lessons about older versions of Norton Internet Security causing performance issues and NIS 2008 and the new NIS 2009 are getting good reviews.

  30. Etrust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thats why I use eTrust. Its cheap, doesn't slow your pc and I'v never gotten a virus by using it.

  31. Damn..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    so Windows really is a virus?

  32. It's how it's done in the internet age, re: Adobe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The age of the internet, where things go bad and no one thinks it's unusual. Lots and lots of crap, all free, mind you, that dumbs down the users that much more. If you paid $1000 for it, you might have other thoughts, like this Photoshop 11 catastrophic UI failure

    http://www.adobeforums.com/webx?128@@.59b6eb20

    which is demonstrated here

    http://img397.imageshack.us/my.php?image=ps11dropdownblacknotyelbt5.jpg

  33. Re:Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And what about those who didn't get the CD and also don't have a %root%\i386 folder? Is there a way to create the CD without the files in there?

  34. Affects XP only by sponga · · Score: 1

    This problem only affects XP so if you are running Vista than you should have no problems.

    Unfortunately that is where the viruses are at right now on XP, ouch.

  35. People work HARD not to change by erroneus · · Score: 1

    I am sure some people are as awed [though not amazed] as I am observing how hard people fight so they don't have to change to something better. Mac OS X and Linux are both very good alternatives to Windows. And where Windows is ABSOLUTELY necessary, there is Virtual Box to run just enough Windows to run the critical apps and the relatively safer Linux or Mac OS X to access everything else.

    People should not have to work THIS hard to keep from changing. It is beyond the critical point at which it is actually cheaper and less difficult to change directions and learn something new.

    1. Re:People work HARD not to change by Samah · · Score: 1

      When Linux can run every single Windows-based game I play, flawlessly, I'll move. Until then, I'd rather use Windows.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    2. Re:People work HARD not to change by erroneus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You and people like you are precisely why the abusive monopolies exist. Your persistent drug-addiction-like dependence on gaming has placed all profiting parties so high on their thrones that they will continue to rule you and all the people like you. Put some principles before your pleasure once in a while and you might develop what some call "character."

      The game developers will not write to Linux or even Mac OS while they already have your short-n-curlies. They have no motivation to change while you remain staunchly loyal to their current model.

    3. Re:People work HARD not to change by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      Buy a gaming console, a macintosh, and never look back.

    4. Re:People work HARD not to change by illumin8 · · Score: 1

      You and people like you are precisely why the abusive monopolies exist. Your persistent drug-addiction-like dependence on gaming has placed all profiting parties so high on their thrones that they will continue to rule you and all the people like you. Put some principles before your pleasure once in a while and you might develop what some call "character."

      It's a fucking computer, not a religion. What you fail to realize is that PC gaming is an entire ecosystem, from hardware manufacturers who have to make drivers for 3d and audio hardware, to Microsoft, to the game developers themselves. Every single component of that chain has literally billions of dollars invested, and it's unfortunate, but it doesn't make a lot of business sense to start over from scratch on some other platform.

      Personally, I'd love to be able to play games on Linux and not deal with Windows, but be realistic, it won't happen until a significant market share of users is on Linux, and it won't happen until the entire ecosystem has "re-tooled" which includes Nvidia and ATI making decent Linux drivers (that don't suck twice as much as their Windows versions) and game developers learning how to code on Linux.

      So don't put the blame on us, the gamer. It's not like we're going to quit playing games. We play games on whatever works, whether it's a Nintendo Wii, Xbox360, PS3, or a Windows PC. If you want us to stop playing games on those platforms, go build your own damn gaming ecosystem on Linux and make better games there. Until then, STFU and drop the religious OS shit. It's a fucking gaming platform, not a fucking religion.

      --
      "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
    5. Re:People work HARD not to change by Erikderzweite · · Score: 1

      If you truly thinks that Linux (as an OS and as a community) owns you something -- don't even consider a switch. Thank you.

    6. Re:People work HARD not to change by Samah · · Score: 1

      Your persistent drug-addiction-like dependence on gaming has placed all profiting parties so high on their thrones that they will continue to rule you and all the people like you.

      I code Java and PL/SQL all day at work, so when I get home, I want to play games. As such, my PC at home is built mostly for gaming.

      Put some principles before your pleasure once in a while and you might develop what some call "character."

      If a new game comes out that I want to play, and won't run in Wine, I can either run it Windows, or fight with my OS trying to get it working while my friends tell me how awesome it is. Thank God I have my "principles" to keep me all warm and fuzzy. Sorry, but that doesn't sound like fun.

      The game developers will not write to Linux or even Mac OS while they already have your short-n-curlies. They have no motivation to change while you remain staunchly loyal to their current model.

      I'm sure many game developers are avid Linux users at home, and are forced to use Windows at work. I'm also sure that many of them would love to see their game running natively in MacOS and/or Linux. The problem is the publisher, who usually doesn't see that market as being "economically viable." People need to understand the difference between "developer" and "publisher."

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    7. Re:People work HARD not to change by Samah · · Score: 1

      Never used a Macintosh, nor do I plan to migrate any time soon.
      I won't get into the whole console vs PC debate (because no-one ever wins), but you will never make me choose a console over a PC.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
    8. Re:People work HARD not to change by Koiu+Lpoi · · Score: 1

      So you're a shining example of the OP's post, eh?

    9. Re:People work HARD not to change by Samah · · Score: 1

      Not really. I've never used a Macintosh because I've never personally needed to. I have no desire to change, because Windows does what I need.

      If at some point in the future I'm presented with a Mac and I have a need to use it, I'll make comparisons and see which I prefer. Until then, I'm happy with Windows.

      --
      Homonyms are fun!
      You're driving your car, but they're riding their bikes there.
  36. Get the real details via UnNews by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1
    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
    1. Re:Get the real details via UnNews by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 1

      Sorry typo, This is the real Captain Obvious UnNews article now with a quote from Batman's sidekick Robin.

      --
      Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  37. Whew by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never run my AVG scans.Glad my irresponsibility finally paid its dividends.

  38. Sounds familiar... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought this sounded oddly familiar... not too long ago I was helping a client out of a mess caused by Trend Micro identifying Windows system files as being infected by a "Generic Trojan"

    The problem was exacerbated by Trend Micro failing to properly quarantine the files and it ended up just corrupting them. Almost needless to say, the repair instructions were useless.

  39. Par for the course by Tridus · · Score: 1

    The one time I installed AVG, it broke my network connection completely. I guess they've improved their technology since then. :P

    --
    -- "So they told me that using the download page to download something was not something they anticipated." - Bill Gates
  40. Re:Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Maybe they should have followed the instructions then?

  41. Re:Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .. by Ka+D'Argo · · Score: 1

    I'm kinda in that boat. Economy has hit me hard so a quick fix for having no PC I bought an eMachine (browsing and browser games). Sadly though it came with Vista Basic Home, it didn't come with a restore disk, the "restore" is a hidden partition that I have no idea how to access from dos, cause it's not even listed as a drive or partition of any kind. And of course asking Gateway is a hassle since their 1-800 isn't even listed in what little documentation comes with the PC, you have to find that on their website, which is a problem if you can't use Windows ;o I'm using AVG but until this issue is fixed I'm not updating definitions.

    --
    Aw Frell this
  42. Re:Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .. by narcberry · · Score: 1

    Don't worry guys, someone made a lot of money selling your computer and OS to you.

    --
    Modding me -1 troll doesn't make me wrong.
  43. John Hardin's Email Sanitizer by flyingfsck · · Score: 1
    --
    Excuse me, but please get off my Pennisetum Clandestinum, eh!
  44. why is it so easy to remove the user32.dll file??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i think that should be the question.. sure its bad that avg removed this file... but the fact that it could be so easily removed (or tampered with) shows a greater security flaw in windows me thinks....

  45. AVG was poison for Devs, now rest of world, too! by soporific16 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    The day AVG started deleting CMDOW.EXE (a very useful utility to hide DOS box windows) BY DEFAULT when it does its scheduled scan (which is set to on by default), was the day the straw broke this camel's back.

    OK, fine, most people won't have CMDOW.EXE on their system legitmately (ie they didn't put it there themselves) and so if they do have that file, something nefarious has happened at some stage. But for all devs that do use this file (and others like it), AVG is not a friend, not even in the slightest.

    So, that leaves the non-devs, and there's enough of them around to build a business model based upon offering the program for free in order to get some paying customers. So, Sometimes, if building a PC for a complete noob and i wasn't going to have to maintain it afterwards, i would ignore my hatred of AVG and just install the latest free ed so at least the user would have a relatively trouble-free anti-virus solution.

    Now, AVG has no doubt ruined many a noobs week because their computer doesn't work and they have no idea how to fix it. Great one AVG!

    I now have a delete-on-sight-with-a-scorched-earth-attitude policy with regard to AVG (was previously only an ignore-at-all-costs-except-when-really-lazy policy). Can all members of the technical elite follow suit? Thanks.

  46. What has changed at AVG? by Bazrr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Over the last few years I have installed AVG Free on hundreds of my customers computers. On the whole it has been a good stable program. While I havent seen this current problem yet, this would be the third time this year that I know of where AVG have stuffed up and caused major problems. The last one was where they disabled Zonealarm and customers lost their connection to the Internet. For your average home user, it is beyond them to know why something goes wrong, it just does. AVG on the other hand seem to be slipping in the way they approach the care they should be taking when releasing updates. Be interesting to know if something has changed this year in their process of developing and releasing updates?

  47. Sigh by polymerousgeek · · Score: 1

    I administer a network of a about 200 windows systems, and we use almost exclusively AVG Free. Oy vey, am I gonna have a long day on Wednesday, maybe I should just unplug the phone now.

    --
    53 49 47 53 20 53 55 43 4B
    1. Re:Sigh by nonewmsgs · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I administer a network of a about 200 windows systems, and we use almost exclusively AVG Free. Oy vey, am I gonna have a long day on Wednesday, maybe I should just unplug the phone now.

      i thought the AVG free license was for personal non-commercial use.

    2. Re:Sigh by perlchild · · Score: 1

      Guess that makes them a tragedy of the commons.

    3. Re:Sigh by polymerousgeek · · Score: 1

      i thought the AVG free license was for personal non-commercial use.

      Probably should've mentioned that we're a small private school, not an commercial organization, so I'm pretty sure there's no potential license issues.

      --
      53 49 47 53 20 53 55 43 4B
    4. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      i do not think that a "small private school" running TWO HUNDRED copies (not that either item alone would be any different.. it wouldn't) fits within the limitations for using avg free:

      from http://free.avg.com/download-avg-anti-virus-free-edition#tba2

      # AVG Anti-Virus Free Edition is for private, non-commercial, single computer use only. The use of AVG Free within any organization or for commercial purposes is strictly prohibited.

    5. Re:Sigh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i thought the AVG free license was for personal non-commercial use.

      Botnet?

  48. Perhaps a.. by slummy · · Score: 1

    deltree /y *.*

    Would be in order?

  49. Re:Sucks to be on windows.. by Majik+Sheff · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I suppose as a Mac user you're more educated and enlightened than the PC users.

    That would explain your abuse of the apostrophe and your usage of the word 'then' when you clearly meant 'than'.

    Fail troll is fail. It's a shame that moderators must waste points on anonymous cowards just so the rest of the community can exist in relative peace.

    --
    Women are like electronics: you don't know how damaged they are until you try to turn them on.
  50. Read the subject line, ... by PPH · · Score: 1

    ... figured they were referring to IE.exe and thought, "Well duh".

    --
    Have gnu, will travel.
  51. Finally by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Antivirus software that really works!

  52. How did you figure that out? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sweet!

    How did you figure that out? And does it stop it from opening your web browser? I think it did that once to tell me about a new major version (which I had to install on my own... it was a pain finding the free version, too), but that might be part of the update section, which is important, if buggy...

  53. In Soviet Russia by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In Soviet Russia, AVG deletes you! Or at least your 50gb porn collection.

  54. Free hugs... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux was handing them out earlier today.

  55. Bug by saxoholic · · Score: 0, Troll

    I don't know... this sounds like a feature to me. AVG should hype this up. On another note, I have AVG, and haven't had this problem yet. Don't know if it's updated itself though.

  56. whew! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good thing I don't keep my AVG up to date!

  57. hmm... by sraviik · · Score: 0

    Me thinks they meant to backup the file in the vault but messed up while defining it so they accidentally release the update wrong so that it deletes it instead of backing it up.

    --
    4c:61:7a:79
  58. Dell support FTP servers are slooooooooowww by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It seems that they either use MS Windoze and AVG too, or they are getting hit by millions of downloads to fix problems tonight.

  59. avg by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i wish that AVG would listen closer to users ..

    and not remove radmin.exe and r_server.exe ..

  60. Re:Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .. by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    On HP/Compaq machines, you can hit F10 at the POST screen (just after power-on of your system) to begin a system restore. Maybe your machine has a similar option at boot-up?

  61. AVG - NVG by kpainter · · Score: 1

    Not Very Good

  62. How hard is it by zakezuke · · Score: 1

    How hard is it for a virus scanner to

    1) Move suspicious files to the chest
    2) log the changes
    3) reboot with a little script that if no successful login in x minuets, restore from last change.

    Something like this would be farking useful.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    1. Re:How hard is it by pimpimpim · · Score: 1

      You are so right, a virus scanner should never do more harm than the thing it protects from. I installed AVG on my wife's computer, but to reduce the load I have it do a virus check only once in a week, whereas it does try to upload the updates every day. This might actually save me from a lot of unnecessary work no,w I will now have to find out if it really is skipping the update.

      --
      molmod.com - computing tips from a molecular modeling
  63. Quality own goal.. by cheros · · Score: 1

    No recovery features (WFT does it have to DELETE that file immediately instead of quarantining it for a few days?), and for most end users they will need that PC to work to read the AVG notice and recovery instructions.. Nice catch 22.

    Morons..

    --
    Insert .sig here. Send no money now. Owner may sue, contents will settle. Batteries not included.
    1. Re:Quality own goal.. by maxume · · Score: 1

      It does quarantine files. This involves copying the file to a special directory and removing the system copy. The problem is that the system copy is needed to boot.

      If a user checks the scan report and restores the file from quarantine before rebooting, they will be fine. If they have the scanner set to trigger a reboot, they are screwed.

      --
      Nerd rage is the funniest rage.
  64. How ironic by Amiralul · · Score: 1

    Boy, I'm so glad that today I'll buy my first MacBook!

  65. Question the effectiveness........ by Anachragnome · · Score: 1

    I have only had 2 attacks on my machine that actually did anything to it.

    Both were keyloggers that ran under run32dll.exe in the form of a dll file. Both were from ads on a popular World of Warcraft site that I picked up pretty much the same day.

    I had AVG 7.5 and it did NOT pick up either. Warcraft caught BOTH of them. Yep. The GAME caught them. Simply told me it didn't like the programs running on my machine and refused to let me log in(Way to go Blizzard! You could have informed me BEFORE I typed in my password though).

    Wasn't that hard to find once I knew there was something to look for, but c'mon, for petes sake. Warden caught it when AVG couldn't?

  66. An easy switch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NOD32 anyone...?

  67. keygens, magical jelly bean etc... by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 3, Informative
    Several of the AV packages mark these as trojans. Just to be on the safe side, upload a sample to virustotal which checks with around 30 different products.

    It's always good to have a second opinion - see e.g.portable clamwin

    Andy

  68. Just one problem here! by Fallen+Andy · · Score: 1
    Restoring USER32.DLL from the CD will get you the version which was installed when you *first* installed XP.

    In other words if your CD is XP + SP1, you'll get the SP1 version. SP2, the SP2 version.

    So, you'll need to re run whatever update procedure you use to get back to a fully up to date and patched system.

    Big hint: google "Heise update" - (I keep all of the updates for XP, vista english on a handy WD pocketdrive (6GB)).

    I just checked on my machine and on a fully patched (post SP3) machine you can find a copy of the newest USER32.DLL in "%SYSTEMROOT%\servicepackfiles\i386".

    On my machine it has a size of 578,560 bytes (version from properties is: 5.1.2600.5512)

    (Then again, maybe AVG hoses that backup copy as well ...)

    Andy

  69. What are virusses again? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

    Oh wait... that was from way back when I was still using Microsoft products.

    --
    Here be signatures
    1. Re:What are virusses again? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How cute, so youve moved to the 1% of the shitpile of FOSS zombies. What is it you guys do anyway besides watching spinning 3d cubes all day? Play games? Photoshop? Flash x64? hahahaha

      There is this weird fat kid in my office who just goes on and on about linux. So we put him in a corner and let him do his shit while he compiles crap all day, we get work done.

      Good riddance. Dont come back.

    2. Re:What are virusses again? by V!NCENT · · Score: 1

      Media center backend (my pc) and a Media center frontend (old Laptop behind my pc). id Software games natively and Win32 games under wine. Browsing the web (read /., read email, etc). Download and watch episodes of tv series. Listen to online radio. Download and play music and also put it on my mp3 player. Instant messaging with friends. Doing work for school with OpenOffice.org. QCAD for CAD work for school (we can chose any CAD app that we want). Watching DVD discs. VoIP with video from my webcam (rarely, but I use it sometimes).

      Am I forgetting something? Nice talking to you Steve Ballmer :P

      --
      Here be signatures
  70. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  71. and you thought that was bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://avgtechnologies.112.2o7.net/b/ss/avgcorporatepublicww/1/H.15.1/s48146192664623?[AQB]&ndh=1&t=11/10/2008%200%3A28%3A42%202%20360&ns=avgtechnologies&pageName=http%3A//www.avg.com/avg-update-bulletin&g=http%3A//www.avg.com/avg-update-bulletin&r=http%3A//www.avg.com/support&server=www.avg.com&s=1440x900&c=32&j=1.7&v=Y&k=Y&bw=1440&bh=708&p=Mozilla%20Default%20Plug-in%3BShockwave%20for%20Director%3BWindows%20Genuine%20Advantage%3BAdobe%20Acrobat%3BShockwave%20Flash%3BJava%28TM%29%20Platform%20SE%206%20U7%3BMicrosoft%AE%20DRM%3BWindows%20Media%20Player%20Plug-in%20Dynamic%20Link%20Library%3B&[AQE]

  72. maybe they should install wubi by default by mAriuZ · · Score: 1

    i think they should install wubi http://wubi-installer.org/ or

    http://unetbootin.sourceforge.net/

    so they can later can recover from such an mess

    --
    developer http://flamerobin.org
  73. proper tag: by excelsior_gr · · Score: 1

    itisnotabugitsafeature

  74. Amazing Post! We heard it here first! by www.blogLinux.org · · Score: 1

    A program had a bug in it? G T F O Who cares? Wake me up when it rm -rf c:\ 's Until then I'll still recommend it to windows lusers Whoops typo

  75. AVG Virus Scanner Removes Critical Windows File by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The popular virus scanner AVG released an updated that caused their software to mark user32.dll as a virus. Since this is a rather critical file, AVG's suggestion to remove it caused problems for users around the world who are now advised to restore the file through the Windows Recovery Console. AVG just posted an update about this (FAQ item 1574) in the support section of their site. Their forums are full of complaints.
    --------------------
    Rose

    Various Social Bookmarking

  76. 2000 called, they wanted their OS back by FoamingToad · · Score: 1

    It's [ rd /s /q . ] these days.

    (Deltree was retired with Win 9x)

    1. Re:2000 called, they wanted their OS back by slummy · · Score: 1

      i haven't used windows since 9x thanks for the tip!

  77. Third major screw up from AVG updates recently by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Clearly they don't test their releases before they send them into the wild.

    Luckily I didn't get the update to AVG yesterday, but I've had it report 2 false positives with recent updates.

    1. They reported zlib.dll as shipped with Winamp as being a virus, and reported the winamp installer with it as well. Winamp is one of the most popular PC apps so should have been tested.
    2. Another windows system file was being reported as a virus recently (I searched their message boards and confirmed it was a false positive before ignoring).

    Sorry, but I'm losing patience with AVG and this current false positive is one too many for me. All occurred in the past few months.

    I'm now looking at Avast, but failing that will have to consider paying for a Norton Antivirus update.

  78. Not just the free ones giving problems, Nod 32 too by mike_diack · · Score: 1

    It's not even a case of "you get what you pay for" anymore:

    Sadly even the rather good Nod32 (ESET) antivirus scanner that has consistently been shown to be one of the better AV's (fast, effective and light), is now beginning to give problems.

    On Sunday I installed the latest (beta) version of "Free Download Manager", a well regarded, open source windows downloader that I've used for months now. Nod32 decided that the uninstaller was malware and deleted it, so if I want to remove it now, I won't be able to via control panel, since the uninstaller has been deleted!

    To me it's beginning to look like the AV industry is now very close to having lost the war against malware. I'm seeing lots of false positives from other AV tools as well.

    Mike

    --
    Linux fan and Win32 developer
  79. If you've got a French XP it'll zap winsrv.dll too by Eunuchswear · · Score: 1

    Fuck.

    --
    Watch this Heartland Institute video
  80. OS vendor responsibility by eniacfoa · · Score: 1

    if MS was legally obliged to provide an adequate anti-virus, there would be a single point of contact for developers. This is the only way I can see it possible. It mite ruin the AV industry, but we'd all probably be better off if MS were accountable for protecting their product from falling to a shitpile with virus infections. And developers would have one place to go to get flagged as clean.

  81. image by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.logi-com.nl/image.nrg Burn this one with nero or something, boot from it and it reapirs automaticcly.

  82. So what are ./ers plans to deal with this? by IceCreamGuy · · Score: 1

    So, for those of us unfortunate enough to be admins at companies that use AVG Network Edition, what are you guys planning to do about this? I have this on about 300 PCs, but since their control console doesn't work, I have no central control over them. Not only that, but the updates don't even work on half of them (goddamn "update unsuccessful"). So I torn, would it be best to disable updates for a while until we can get the manual update files out, or to update to the latest on every single client machine?

  83. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  84. Too little... by UnixUnix · · Score: 1

    Actually, AVG is not wrong -- quite the opposite; but it doesn't go far enough. ALL of Windows is a virus :D

  85. Lets watch the stocks crash by hesaigo999ca · · Score: 1

    Where's the popcorn...let's watch the stocks crash!

  86. Re:Slipstreaming boot drivers by obscured_dude · · Score: 1

    N-lite is your friend!!! http://www.nliteos.com/

  87. Nothing new by OtakuPersona · · Score: 1

    AVG has been the master of false-positives for a while. Some legitimate application are picked up repeatedly as a different trojan/virus every several months. Every time they are informed they fix it in their next definition, only to make the same mistake again with the same programme a few months later. Their quality control seems fairly poor.

  88. virus? What's that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    LOL at you Windows users! Wake up and use a real OS already.

  89. Blowinâ(TM) In The Wind by triso · · Score: 1

    Let me have Bob Dylan sing out why I no longer use MS Windows.

    How many roads must a man walk down
    Before you call him a man?
    Yes, n how many seas must a white dove sail
    Before she sleeps in the sand?
    Yes, n how many times must the cannon balls fly
    Before they're forever banned?
    The answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind,
    The answer is blowin in the wind.

    How many times must a man look up
    Before he can see the sky?
    Yes, n how many ears must one man have
    Before he can hear people cry?
    Yes, n how many deaths will it take till he knows
    That too many people have died?
    The answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind,
    The answer is blowin in the wind.

    How many years can a mountain exist
    Before its washed to the sea?
    Yes, n how many years can some people exist
    Before they're allowed to be free?
    Yes, n how many times can a man turn his head,
    Pretending he just doesn't see?
    The answer, my friend, is blowin in the wind,
    The answer is blowin in the wind.

    Next: Joan Baez sings against closed-source.

  90. Laugh by sjbe · · Score: 1

    A joke's pretty worthless if your audience does not understand it. You might as well be speaking in Japanese.

    He who laughs last thinks slowest

  91. What's wrong with that? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AVG should delete the rest of windows as well to leave a secure state... ;)

  92. Why use AV at all? by Sun.Jedi · · Score: 1

    I read this article a while back, and decided to opt-out of the AV hassles.

    Between backups, automated installs, and some really simple things you can do to minimize infections, I find AV to be more 'in-the-way', than not.

    I do things like disabling MS macros, java, popups, vbscript, etc ... I use adblock/noscript. I've had to rebuild a few times, sure, but I don't consider a rebuild to be a huge timesink. I have all my game/app settings on a CD, so its not real hard.

    Disclaimer: I only use Windows to play games on, primarily. My situation may not fit corporate standards or grandma/grandpa usage. I'm pretty sure corps use ADS or some such, and I have no intention of putting a boot server in my Mother's house, so there is that drawback which may make it worthwhile for some to use AV.

    MS had an interesting suggestion regarding which AV vendor to choose.

    All in all, AV seems to take more time, and cause more problems (even simple ones) than its worth, never mind the expense. YMMV.

  93. Re:Please insert the Windows XP installation CD .. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's the plan, Haven't you heard M$ wants to get rid of XP. What better way than to "pay off" AVG. Users don't have the CD, can't reload, doesn't know about Ubuntu etc. They go buy new PC

  94. Web Page Statement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who understands their dual-meaning message from their web site when it reads "AVG goes beyond other security software by protecting you in ways nobody else can"?

    It's SO tough to get a Windows virus when you can't start Windows.

  95. Sucks to be you.. by destiney · · Score: 1

    /me pets his Linux kernel.

  96. two sheep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one shoop

  97. Not a problem for English language versions by lloyd_borrett · · Score: 1

    The problem only affects AVG users of the Dutch, French, Italian, Portuguese, and Spanish language versions of Windows XP. It has no impact on those who use the English language version of Windows XP. Best Regards, Lloyd Borrett Marketing Manager, AVG (AU/NZ) Australian & New Zealand distributors of AVG Anti-Virus & Internet Security Products. www.avg.com.au

  98. AVG 8.0 = FAIL by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to be a huge supporter of AVG free. Recommending my customers download and install it, even including a link to the page on newly installed desktops.

    To my knowledge everything was fine until:

    A: COX and other "inhome tech" service offerings began installing it as part of their service(yes, I know, this is illegal according to the TOS, but legality has never stopped a major comms. provider before, why now right?)- I mention COX due to the fact that they actually used video footage of a tech installing the free version on a 'customers' comp during an ad for the service, which enraged GriSoft to no end, understandably.

    B: In order to gain some perceived 'lost revenue', AVG began partnering up, and taking payments to falsely flag certain files as threats, when they were not. I've even seen some HP and Dell scripts flagged as threats!

    C: Updates are now nowhere near as current as they used to be, with even more viruses* slipping through immediately after an update that should have covered them. This applies to paid and free versions. It seems someone there must have spoken to someone at Symantec, because now, AVG is as useless, invasive, and annoying as any Norton product. Granted that last part is pure speculation, but the pattern is starting to fit.

    All that said, I have emailed all my customers, and suggested those using AVG try something else, NOD32 seems to work fine, and be as effective as AVGfree used to be, for what that's worth. Not only is it as effective, but far less annoying, less resource intensive, and generally easier to use. It's package deal for home users is attractive as well, price wise.

  99. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion