Slashdot Mirror


User: Eunuchswear

Eunuchswear's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
6,176
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 6,176

  1. Re:Lethal? on Contractor Proposes Laser Rifles for US Military · · Score: 1
    If your microwave delivered two kilowatts of power you'd have your turkey cooked in no time
    Mine is 800W, it takes a lot longer than .35 seconds to cook a turkey. It takes about a minute to heat a cup of water up hot enough for instant coffee.

    Thinks, 660 joules is 157 calories, so it'll boil about 1cc of water, so it's not going to cook very much of a human body.

    P.S. what kind of barbarian would try to cook a turkey in a microwave?

  2. Re:Advantages? on Contractor Proposes Laser Rifles for US Military · · Score: 2, Insightful
    * silent
    It fires hot gas through a supersonic nozzle and you think it'd be silent?
    * no recoil
    Nope, 90 pounds of recoil from the afforementioned supersonic gas
    * less resupply problems (lay a power cable to the forward camp instead of moving trucks full of ammo)
    Nope, it takes big lumps of polonium 210 and compressed cylinders of CO2, Nitrogen and Helium, not electricity. By the way, how do you imagine it would be defending a 300Km power cable instead of a few truck convoys?
    * if constructed right, can be enclosed completely = less susceptable to dirt, dust and water
    Better be enclosed, it's full of gas at 2173K and a nice lump of alpha-emitting Po 210.

  3. Re:Lethal? on Contractor Proposes Laser Rifles for US Military · · Score: 1
    A net energy output to target of approximately 1.9 kW sounds quite lethal to me.
    Huh? 1.9kW is power, not energy. 1.9kW for how long? Ah, 0.35 seconds. So that's 660 joules, most websites seem to be giving 1570J for a 5.56mm NATO round, so the fancy laser gun puts out less than half the energy of a boring old M16 or SA80.
  4. Re:Subscription Perks on Miyazaki's 'Spirited Away' Wins Best Animated Picture · · Score: 1

    Huh, I bought it in (late January, early Feb? can't remember). Finaly some good comes out of being in zone 2.

  5. Re:Yeah! on Looking for Unbiased War News? · · Score: 1


    And we all know what happened to Bambi! She was exploited by Diseny, and burned in a forest fire afterwards



    Bambi was a boy.

  6. Re:Almost nothing new here on Analysis of SCO vs. IBM · · Score: 2, Informative
    Ah, but a distinction - it seems the SCO people are willfully blurring the patent/copyright issue. Yes, they have patents on Unix. No, it doesn't extend to EVERYTHING about Unix. And I bet they don't have a patent, say, System V startup script formats.

    SCO has no patents at all. None. Follow the Patents, People

  7. Re:Isn't there a law against that? on SCO Sues IBM for Sharing Secrets with Unix and Linux · · Score: 1

    Fair? Fair? This isn't a game.

  8. Re:no mention on Europe Heads for the Moon in July · · Score: 1

    Pledge of Allegiance: One nation, under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all...


    Surely you mean:



    I pledge allegiance to my Flag and the Republic for which it stands, one nation, indivisible, with liberty, equality and justice for all.

  9. Re:This isn't going to make the US on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    Well, natives have something called a birth certificate. They can also get social security cards

    So the foreigners have hard to forge ID cards while the natives have nice easy to copy birth certificates.


    Still a little problem there.


    By the way, I'm a resident alien in a country where I have to carry an identity card. This only makes sense because the natives have to have cards too, and the police have the right to ask for your card when they feel like it.


    I just don't see how "identity cards for foreigners" can work without going the whole way.

  10. Re:BULLSHIT on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    Hitler never killed his own people and then blamed someone else!


    Never? No Never!


    Keep on dreaming.

  11. Re:Good. NOT! on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1


    But come on, be honest: the real bad guys will lie in that form, won't they?


    Are you now, or have you ever been, a member of the communist party?


    Of course you'll lie if you should say yes, but THEY WANT YOU TO - it's the lie that lets them deport (or imprison) you. If you answer yes then you don't get the visa, if you answer no then you do time. Simple.

  12. Re:big deal on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    ...get rid of the soldures with semi-automatic weapons in your air ports


    What kind of fucking wimpy, nay even gay, country has soldiers armed with semi-automatic weapons in air ports. We butch European countries insist on Full-automatic weapons, preferably with big magazines. Excuse me, now I have to go in to a darkened room to calm down. Nurse!
  13. Re:Amusing read... on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 0, Troll
    And, as of 20:40 UTC 9/2/2003 this is marked (score: 0).


    Slashdot is only moderated by people with no sense of humor.

  14. Re:This isn't going to make the US on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    Colonial involvement in the French & Indian/Seven Years War started with George Washington taking some guys out to Western Pennsylvania to defend his investment in the Ohio Land Company again the French at Ft. Duquense.


    And those horrid unfair "taxes without representation" were imposed to pay for this idiot war.


    Which did make the US.


    Makes you think, doesn't it.


    Or maybe not.

  15. Re:This isn't going to make the US on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1


    First, the government should issue these cards to all foreigners and keep a tab on them.

    (I feel like an idiot for replying to the same comment twice).


    You do realize that "cards for foreigners" is only useful if "natives" have cards too. Otherwise how will la Migra tell the difference between you and some smelly mex who threw his card away?

  16. Re:This isn't going to make the US on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    There are over 10 million illegal aliens in the U.S. Most of them are overstays. The government needs to check on foreigners every now and then to see if they're still legal.

    Nice idea. So, you're introducing the national identity card (with obligation to register residence and Frence style "controle d'identite" by the police) when?

  17. Re:Foreign passports require biometrics? on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    the US would suspect
    [suspend?] that country's membership of the visa waiver programme


    And you do know why the programme exists? The day France is removed is the day all those nice american tourists start needing a visa to see the Eiffel Tower.


    Deterrence, it works if both sides have the bomb.

  18. Re:scary on US Immigration Implements Biometric-based Border · · Score: 1

    So if 1984 comes 20 years late ...

    Since Orwelll (aka Mr Blair) was writing about
    1948...
  19. Re:Hypocrisy? on Even Sun Can't Use Java · · Score: 1

    You know, a week ago I had moderator points. Bugger.

  20. ACL's (was Re:Backdoors) on Shell Simulation Via CGI · · Score: 1

    I first used ACL's in 1978 on an ICL 1903T running George 3 (and George 4 in the hours of darkness).

    Can we talk about dick size now?

  21. Re:They will fail on Software Libre: DoHS Switches, Commerce Slights · · Score: 1
    The post I was responding to called for coffee growers to "form a cartel like OPEC." I had difficulty in deciding where to begin to show just how ludicrous this statement is.
    And what's ludicrous about the International Coffee Organization?
  22. Re:Hmm... on 98% of DNS Queries at the Root Level are Unnecessary · · Score: 1
    ...So I guess most of those unneccessary top-level DNS requests were for www.clownpenis.fart, right?
    ...click, whoops make that 1 more!
  23. Re:Highlight... on 98% of DNS Queries at the Root Level are Unnecessary · · Score: 1
    How does a query containing a valid IP address ever get to a root server?
    Because it's a query.

    In other word's someone is doing something like:

    if (gethostbyname (argv[1])) {
    ... connect;
    }
    else if (inet_aton (argv[1])) {
    ... connect
    }
    (I think that Windows might do this if you pass a dotted address to gethostbyname).
  24. Re:Vatican on 98% of DNS Queries at the Root Level are Unnecessary · · Score: 1


    "Scientists at the Vatican Praying Center found that 98% of the prayer queries at the God level are unnecessary."


    Protestantism provides better response times (no unnecessary priest gateways between believer and God) but Catholisism has better resource usage!
  25. Re:In related news on 98% of DNS Queries at the Root Level are Unnecessary · · Score: 1
    ...DNS service was quite problematic, on their very young ethernet network. My solution was to play with dig a little bit and enter a couple root servers into my /etc/resolv.conf.
    Which was (or should have been) pointless. Why would a root server answer a recursive query? Oh, because it's runing Broken Internet Name Daemon.