Slashdot Mirror


User: leonardluen

leonardluen's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
791
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 791

  1. Re:WTF? on School Bans 'Tag' · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i bet this kid does feels safer now...when all the other kids, who no longer have an avenue to outlet their energy by playing tag, beat this kid to a pulp because he got them all banned from playing tag.

  2. Re:Oh, boo hoo on uTube.com Business Stalled by YouTube Purchase Hype · · Score: 2, Interesting

    according to whois utube.com has been registered since 1996
    youtube.com has been registered since 2005

    i think when they first made their website that was the last thing they were thinking about.

  3. Re:Car alarms anyone? on UK Firm To Release 'Screaming' Cell Phone · · Score: 1

    what makes you think this would embarass people now when they are already too stupid to turn their phone off in places such as a movie theater?

  4. Re:Maybe it's just me... on Mastering Regular Expressions · · Score: 4, Funny

    i see you have not yet mastered reqular expressions

  5. Re:Or saw the pollution to supply the e-cars... on Smithsonian Removes EV1 Exhibit · · Score: 2, Informative

    you are forgetting that not all power is created at fossile fuel burning power plant.

    so for the sake of argument let's just assume your numbers are correct. you said a gas car is roughly 30% efficient. i read several other comments mentioning that 20% of power in the US is generated via nuclear power. we will even forget that some power is also generated via other clean methods such as wind solor or hydro.

    so taking this into account that makes our car suddenly 20% more efficient since 20%+ of the power isn't from fossile fuels so... .24 + .24*20% = .29 wow, that seems aweful close to your number for efficiency of a gas car! and we even left out a number of other types of clean power generation.

    also it takes a lot of energy to refine gas from crude oil. so that should be added into your calculations for the efficiency of a gas car. generally most fossil fuel plants don't use the same fuels you burn in your car, so you would probably have to take into account the refining of their fuel as well.

    now 3/4 of statistics are made up on the spot so take this with a grain of salt. maybe my math is bad or there is some other flaw in my argument, but the point i wanted to make is that the efficiency isn't as simple as you are trying to make it out to be.

  6. Re:The official story is a conspiracy theory. on US Releasing 9/11 Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Tape · · Score: 1

    that is the problem...how would you know when they aren't feeding you bullshit? what if they already are telling you what they really know and you just don't believe it because you think the story you made up is more plausible?

  7. Re:The official story is a conspiracy theory. on US Releasing 9/11 Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Tape · · Score: 1

    also how does "* half of the presumed "hijackers" still alive in Saudi Arabia or Qatar "
    prove anything other than we don't know WHO the hijackers were?

  8. Re:Of Bunkers and Reichstag fires.. on US Releasing 9/11 Flight 77 Pentagon Crash Tape · · Score: 1

    tell me this, if you think that the government is so malicious and full of such masterminds to pull of a conspiracy of this magnitude while fooling millions of people into thinking it was a ragtag group of terrorists, then why did they not have the foresight to also cover their tracks with building 7? why would they leave such a glaring hole that you could use to pick apart their entire story and make their whole "conspiracy" come crumbling to the ground?

  9. Re:Two photons travelling in opposite directions on Light so Fast it Travels Backward · · Score: 1

    from the frame of reference of the photon itself, since time does not pass for it, it believes that it is moving at infinite velocity.

  10. Re:quote on Light so Fast it Travels Backward · · Score: 1

    Look at the simulator and just imagine changing the waves slightly so that the pulse moves backward instead of forward.

    or instead of imagining it you can click on the simulator and it does it for you...

  11. Re:Simple solution... on Bill Would Outlaw Digital Receiver Recorders · · Score: 1

    yeah, that worked well with the DMCA didn't it?

    (hint: it was signed into law by clinton)

  12. Re:So how do we... on Quantum Computer Works Better Shut Off · · Score: 5, Funny

    So how do we overclock it?

    buy more cats

  13. Re:Answers.. on Quantum Computer Works Better Shut Off · · Score: 1

    the only "deadlocks" that occur are when you open the box and look at the cat...

  14. Re:you seem to think that J.K. Rowling is an Ameri on The Great HDCP Fiasco · · Score: 1

    her works became governed by US copyright laws the minute she published them in the US. so it doesn't really matter where she is from, because she decided to publish here she has to follow US laws.

  15. Re:Fees and Acceptance on E-Tracking May Change the Way You Drive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    darn right! that is the way it should be! heck it should be even cheaper than it is!

    you should be appalled that you let your greedy govts in europe beat you over the head with the tax club every time you fill up your tank.

    americans hate taxes...we went to war with england over taxes. damn right we aren't going to let any tax go on our gas without complaining

  16. Re:FP: What a great idea! on FCC Report Supports a la Carte TV Pricing · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, I wonder if some channels will actually become FREE in the hopes of selling ads. (I guess that didn't work in newspapers and magazines, but they are cheap.)

    some channels alread do it...they are called over the air and have existed for many many years (even before cable--gasp!!!). and i know a great many people that don't have cable or sattelite and only watch these "free" channels.

    seriously, it shows that it is possible for a company to broadcast without charging a fee. heck making yourself available over cable should theoretically be cheaper than broadcasting over the air, because then you don't necessarily need all those expensive transmitters.

  17. Re:The "environment" on The Math Behind the Hybrid Hype · · Score: 1

    maybe instead of taxing gas we could just tax vehicles based on efficiency!

    isn't that what taxing gas does? the more gas a car uses the more taxes a person pays for that vehicle...thus you are essentially taxing vehicles with bad gas milleage more than vehicles with good gas milleage

  18. Re:Greed on 419 Emails From A Cultural Perspective · · Score: 1

    >>sudo: user 'Lottery' is not in /etc/sudoers file. This incident will be reported.

    looks like you lost...maybe you should buy another ticket

  19. Re:Region Coding on PS2 Mod Chips Legal In Australia · · Score: 1

    because only s small proportion of people install mod chips to unlock their player from region coding.

  20. Re:All very weel and good on New Battery Technology Powers For 12 Years · · Score: 0

    probably because people are afraid of the word "nuclear"

  21. Re:Using a coil and background power? on New Battery Technology Powers For 12 Years · · Score: 1

    >>First of all, a coil only generates current when the magnetic flux through the coil is changing.

    so all a person would have to do is walk in circles around people on their cell phone!

    that solves several problems at once! first you get power for your pace maker, you get exercise, and you annoy the heck out of people on cell phones!

  22. Re:So she did her job... on Bush Supreme Court Nominee Former Microsoft Lawyer · · Score: 1

    the job of a lawyer is to fight for their client as much as possible.

    it is the job of a judge/jury is to hand out justice. if justice failed, then it is the judge/jury's fault, not the lawyers.

  23. Re:I think I speak for a lot of people when I say. on How About a Nice Game of Global Thermonuclear War? · · Score: 1

    well then i guess it is time to start the "free beer" party! we can probably gather a whole lot of members right here on slashdot.

    if together we can bring a server to its knees crying in pain then we must truly be powerful!

  24. Re:I think I speak for a lot of people when I say. on How About a Nice Game of Global Thermonuclear War? · · Score: 1

    Some (lots) of us who voted for Bush did so because we disliked Kerry

    instead of voting for someone you disliked less, you should have voted for a candidate you did like. there are many great 3rd party candidates out there, the problem is people don't think they could possibly win the election, and so no one votes for them. this has become a self fulfilling prophecy...no one is willing to vote for them, so there is no possibility they will ever be elected. we need to break from this cycle/mentality and start voting for the GOOD candidate, not just the lesser of two evils! if everyone voted for who they precieved to be the good candidate, then some of these 3rd party candidates would indeed be capable of being elected.

    by voting for what you perceived to be the lesser of two evils you simply wasted your vote, and now you have to live with the poison you chose yourself

  25. Re:I think I speak for a lot of people when I say. on How About a Nice Game of Global Thermonuclear War? · · Score: 1

    I think I heard a statistic on a television show the other night stating that 20% of adults think the Sun revolve around Earth.

    damn that is bad, only 20% of people know the truth! didn't we learn from einstein that motion is relative? since motion is relative, then we are stationary observers...the sun does indeed revolve around the earth, and the earth for all practicality is the center of the universe since it is our point of refference for everything we see in the universe.