Slashdot Mirror


UK Firm To Release 'Screaming' Cell Phone

rubberbando writes "Yahoo news is running a story about a plan by a UK cell phone company to help reduce cell theft. Apparently, this new cell phone can be sent a signal after its owner has realized that it has been lost or stolen. The signal tells the phone to wipe all of its data and begin emitting a very loud and obnoxious sound. The sound will only stop if the battery runs out or is removed, but it will begin again as soon as the battery is replaced or charged. Even replacing the sim card will not help."

230 comments

  1. Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It sounds from the description that these phones will become functionally useless once you do this to them. What a fun prank to pull on your friends!

    1. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by RsG · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even better, imagine what will happen if their system is less than secure. Try and think about the damage a script kiddie could do if he got ahold of a list of people's passwords and phone numbers.

      Or, even worse, if he found out how to send the signal to the phones sans password - after all, if the company is lazy, then maybe all they'd do is dial up the cell phone and send a general purpose "kill" signal. Figure out how to tell the cellphone that it's stolen while still in the possession of its owner, and you can make somebody very, very mad.

      --
      Erotic is when you use a feather. Exotic is when you use the whole chicken.
    2. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by Jaruzel · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The kill signal will probably be in the format of a special (Operator) SMS text message. Much in the same way your Internet settings can be sent by your provider over the air (OTA) to your phone.

      However, I had an app a while back that could 'build' Operator SMS messages and send them out to peoples phones, so yeah, unless the Operator takes serious steps to secure this system, it's gonna be hacked in no time. Once hacked, the concept will be useless, and the manufacturers will stop including the kill-system in the firmware...

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    3. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      especially if the owner is in a movie theater.

    4. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You got your quote wrong, it's "Erotic is when you use a feather, kinky is when you use the whole chicken."

    5. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by kestasjk · · Score: 1

      Yes, I'm sure the potential for malicious use never crossed the engineers' minds while they were working on this protection mechanism.

      --
      // MD_Update(&m,buf,j);
    6. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by wpanderson · · Score: 1

      Planned obsolescence ... that's a bit like linking to Yahoo! News; the story can also be permanently read at Reuters for posterity's sake. Think of the slashdot grandchildren!

      --
      neuro at well dot com (when I post, it's my opinions, no-one elses)
    7. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by Itchy+Rich · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Try and think about the damage a script kiddie could do if he got ahold of a list of people's passwords and phone numbers.

      I doubt they'll need script kiddies to screw this up for them.

    8. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by om3ga · · Score: 1
      Try and think about the damage a script kiddie could do if he got ahold of a list of people's passwords and phone numbers.
      Just a thought, what if some script kiddie disabled a someones mobile phone, the phone of which was needed to call 911, resulting in someone dying due to being unable to get help? would that kid be put up for murder?
    9. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by posidian · · Score: 1

      After my rather expensive phone (Seimens SX66) was stolen in Italy last month, I would pay to be able to do this now. I don't care that I can't get my phone back, but the knowledge that someone else just easily dumped my SIM card and is using it really pisses me off.

    10. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by kalirion · · Score: 1

      I'm sure it did, and maybe some of them even let their managers know, and maybe some of those let the business/marketing departments know. That's where the knowing stopped and the engineers and managers were told to leave the business decisions to the professionals.

    11. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      Most likely, involuntary manslaughter at worst. That is what gets charged when you are commiting an illegal or wreckless act, which results in someones death, but the death was unintentional.

    12. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by virg_mattes · · Score: 1

      > would that kid be put up for murder?

      Extremely unlikely. A charge of murder requires proof of intent. The prosecution would need to prove that the kid did the disabling with the intent of preventing the user from calling 911, that he had foreknowledge that calling 911 would be necessary to preserve the victim's life, and that the victim had no other reasonable means for calling for help. That's a pretty steep curve.

      Criminal negligence, on the other hand, would be relatively easier to prove.

      Virg

    13. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by ReverendLoki · · Score: 1

      I know in the States there are regions with laws that allow for someone who, in committing a criminal act, causes an accidental death to be charged with murder, and not just manslaughter. Now, I am not a legal expert of any kind, and I don't recall which jurisdictions and which criminal acts, but I think most felonies fall under these laws. Now, wouldn't pulling off this little hack involve circumventing electronic encryption? Would that mean violating the DMCA, and would that be a felony?

      --
      09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
    14. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by denttford · · Score: 1

      You're probably thinking about felony Murder, which requires a fairly serious violent crime to make the incidental deaths murder.

      --

      Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
    15. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by mfrank · · Score: 1

      They had this on the local news last night; you can still dial 911 with the phone even if it's screaming. You can't dial other numbers, though.

    16. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by joNDoty · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article says the system also automatically backs up everything on your phone once per day. If your phone gets wiped, everything can be reloaded. I'm patting myself on the back now for reading TFA.

    17. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by Hamoohead · · Score: 1

      Heh. Can't wait to call my ex.

      --
      "If your parents never had children, chances are you wonât either." -Dick Cavett
    18. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by tzanger · · Score: 1

      However, I had an app a while back that could 'build' Operator SMS messages and send them out to peoples phones, so yeah, unless the Operator takes serious steps to secure this system, it's gonna be hacked in no time. Once hacked, the concept will be useless, and the manufacturers will stop including the kill-system in the firmware...

      I've been trying to do this for some time now. In North America, at least, it's damn near impossible to get a hold of your carrier's SMSC so you can send an SMS without going through the SMS-Email gateway (which mangles the message so you can't send things like "voicemail" messages).

      Then there are SMS gateways online, but pretty much all of the ones I've found are quite pricey, both in setup and per-message costs.

      Which software did you use? Was it carrier-agnostic?

    19. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Not sure of the app name, it may have be an old version of LogoManager for Nokia Phones, either way, IIRC SMS messages are just sent via a convoluted AT command on the serial port of the phone its self, and there's a flag that determines what type of message it is.

      I'm sure there's an RFC on it somewhere.

      But you are right, you need direct access to the SMSC, and here in the UK (and Europe too I believe) that's publicly available information.

      Of course to send SMSs properly you need a GSM datacard or Mobile Phone with a valid SIM in it, hooked up to your PC - Using any ather method (internet gateway et al.) is sure to end up in frustration.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    20. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought it was "erotic is when you kiss her, kinky is when she lets you feel her boobies".

    21. Re:Brilliant application of 'planned obsolecence' by guyjr · · Score: 1

      This would be a great way for parents to enforce a curfew on their teens... send their cell phones the signal to scream until they get home, and block all calls except to good ol' dear mom and pop.

  2. loud and obnoxious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    And I thought cell phones were already loud and obnoxious...

    1. Re:loud and obnoxious by Null+Perception · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, its just the people that use them

      --
      Great new book on Evolution: The Greatest Show on Earth by Richard Dawkins
    2. Re:loud and obnoxious by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I wonder if you can program the sound to be that of a dying giraffe.

  3. So basically... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's a hardware GUID. Whoopdy-do; if there's a remote method to turn it on via software, there's a method to turn it off via software.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:So basically... by PlusFiveTroll · · Score: 1

      I pray the cell phone companies do this, then a virus gets a few million of them at once. I don't know who would scream louder, the phones or the owners.

    2. Re:So basically... by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      Not necessarily. If it writes an "I'm disabled" flag to some place in the onboard NOR flash, and the loader reads this to decide whether to proceed with a boot or not, you'd have to rewrite the loader or the NOR flash in order to turn it off. Pulling all the power wouldn't help since the flash is designed to hold data when the power is out.

      If you have the tools to rewrite the NOR flash, then you can indeed turn off the alarm with software. The software will be external to the phone and will have to use some hardware connection to it, though.

    3. Re:So basically... by random_culchie · · Score: 1

      Its a nice idea but many of the previous attempts to disable or block phones that were stolen are easily worked around. Most stolen phones that are blocked can easily be reenabled by flashing them with a new firmware which changes the phones IMEI (International Mobile Equipment Identity) number. This unique number is is used for among other things identify phones that are reported stolen. Blocking the SIM card is easily circumvented by changing the SIM. Unless phones are designed with the IMEI set at the factory on a part of the phone's memory that cannot be changed, these new measures are useless.

    4. Re:So basically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no. you can design a useful circuit but load the wrong firmware onto say an atmel chip and there's a chance it might physically blow up. you can't reverse that by software.

      but it would be wise of the company to make it reversible so that when the phone is found it can be reset by the proper owner.

  4. Yahoo news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And Fark, BBC, Stuff, etc, etc. Yesterday.

  5. Obnoxious? by Fembot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The thing I don't get is how exactly they expect this to be any more loud and obnoxious than all these damn ringtones are already!

    1. Re:Obnoxious? by pete6677 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some asshole will probably find a way to use this sound as his ringtone!

    2. Re:Obnoxious? by stonecypher · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They might play Britney Spears. It'd explain why they're described as 'screaming.'

      --
      StoneCypher is Full of BS
    3. Re:Obnoxious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, 'screaming' would refer to anyone within earshot.

  6. Another deep thought... by mctk · · Score: 3, Funny

    If cell phones could scream, would we be so cavalier about smashing them on the ground? We might, if they screamed all the time for no good reason.

    --
    Paul Grosfield - the quicker picker upper.
    1. Re:Another deep thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I love Jack Handey...

  7. i can only wait by macadamia_harold · · Score: 4, Funny

    The signal tell the phone to wipe all of its data and begin emitting a very loud and obnoxious sound.

    Isn't this what happens if Paris Hilton calls you?

    1. Re:i can only wait by banuk · · Score: 2, Funny

      Isn't this what happens if Paris Hilton calls you?

      You're wrong, it doesnt happen to your cellphone, it happens to your brain when she calls.

    2. Re:i can only wait by gbulmash · · Score: 1

      "You're wrong, it doesnt happen to your cellphone, it happens to your brain when she calls."

      So you're saying Paris Hilton = Snow Crash?

      - Greg

  8. As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by CosmeticLobotamy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "We also then set a small bomb off, if you like, that completely wipes the data...

    As well as the ear and most of the face of the thief? Seems a little harsh.

    1. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by KDR_11k · · Score: 1

      Acually it's a counterfeit Nokia Li-Ion battery with its trigger wired to this system.

      Oh, wait, here on Slashdot people only get it if I say Sony battery.

      --
      Justice is the sheep getting arrested while an impartial judge declares the vote void.
    2. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by ricky-road-flats · · Score: 4, Funny
      As well as the ear and most of the face of the thief? Seems a little harsh.
      /insert standard Sony laptop battery joke here/

      Actually it reminded me of something I was talking about just yesterday, a funny scene from the BBC series from the 1980s, 'The New Statesman'. The main star (Rik Mayall) is held up at knifepoint, and quickly hands over his wallet when it's demanded. The theif runs off, at which point the star smiles, pulls out a little remote from his breast pocket, flips a switch and presses the red button. You hear an explosion and a scream in the distance. Great stuff!

    3. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by Goose+In+Orbit · · Score: 1

      Re: sig. So that's why they changed the name!

    4. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by Aumaden · · Score: 1

      The idea's already been used in faux commercial form: http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-279368700 1194157382

    5. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by blugu64 · · Score: 1

      Man I remember that. I was working at a cell phone refurbishing shop in the late 90's. Smoking 3rd party Nokia batterys were a weekly, if not daily occurance. Depending on volume of nokias that week.

      --
      "Personal ownership is a hallmark of conservative capitalism. And I don't believe I am entitled to anything that I did n
    6. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by neersign · · Score: 1

      You hear an explosion and a scream in the distance

      I too think and exploding device or possibly a more humane "stun gun" type action would be more appropriate than a screaming phone. Think of all the car alarms that are ignored now. I think it would be a lot harder to ignore some one going in to convulsions on the floor.

    7. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, Google had videos before the 1980s? That's impressive.

    8. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Three Stooges did a similar joke nearly 65 years ago - after trying to find an honest man by leaving a wallet on the sidewalk (and having the contents of the wallet stolen several times), filling the wallet with gunpowder and detonating it (using wires and a battery) after a guy picks it up and puts it in his pocket.

    9. Re:As Hammurabi said, a blown-up face for a phone. by diskonaut · · Score: 1

      Didn't James Bond's car have something similar in "For Your Eyes Only"?

  9. just wait till the secret code is posted on google by giuntag · · Score: 0

    ...and all the legit cell phones go off screaming! was it the final scene of the lawnmoverman? or did they copy the idea from some idiotic scheme for configuring atm machines?

  10. Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by Vihai · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I would prefer if the phone could silently send me a usage report so that I could track who stole it and kick him in the a....

    1. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by mikesd81 · · Score: 1

      What good would the usage report do? You may be able to see what the thief did, but how would you track the mobile phone? Now, if it sent a GPS signal to you, that'd be different.

      --
      That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
    2. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by Johan+Palmqvist · · Score: 1

      You can track the phone's current location by subscribing to a positioning service. It's not nearly as efficient as GPS but you will get an estimated position that is still pretty close to the real one.

    3. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by Vihai · · Score: 1

      Will the thief ever call a number published on the phone directory? There you will find a physical address where to go and ask... who is him?

    4. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by Renraku · · Score: 1

      ..so you can get arrested for assault.

      You're expected to let the police take 6+ weeks to recover a stolen item.

      --
      Job? I don't have time to get a job! Who will sit around and bitch about being broke and unemployed then?
    5. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      These two numbers were the last ones called after my phone handset was stolen. I called one of them and asked if he knew who it was who rang him twice, and spoke for a total of 2 min, 20 seconds Perhaps slashdotters would like to slashdot his phone for me.

      +61 402 558 349

    6. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 1

      Doesn't "usage" imply that he's running up your phone bill? I think this sounds like a good start, if not the best way of taking care of the problem.

      --
      "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life
    7. Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by bannerman · · Score: 1

      Your cell phone company can do this. When my wife's phone was stolen, they gave me a complete list of the numbers that had been called and the street that the user was currently driving down while talking. This was like 3 years ago. It just so happened that the phone was in a really bad part of town and all of the people they were talking to had Russian last names. I decided against tracking the phone down myself :-P

      --
      I keep forgetting my place. Jesus is for losers. Why do I still play to the crowd?
  11. Stolen phones == customer fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let's face it, a good proportion of "stolen" phones are people that want a free upgrade from the network. Oh look, they don't make that model any more, and coincidentally I was mugged today. Like the person that rung from the phone that was being reported stolen.

    1. Re:Stolen phones == customer fraud by hadhad69 · · Score: 1

      although most companies I know of have an insurance policy which requires you to pay an excess fee (for my phone it was £50! and thus I didnt bother reporting it stolen)

      --
      If you can read this, it's already too late.
    2. Re:Stolen phones == customer fraud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you assuming the situation of someone who paid for a phone insurance??? (Which is a bad idea in the first place.)

      Otherwise, by what rationale do you get a free cell phone when you lose yours?

    3. Re:Stolen phones == customer fraud by LiENUS · · Score: 1

      My phone company requires a police report and 50$ before theyl'l give you a new phone.

    4. Re:Stolen phones == customer fraud by tchuladdiass · · Score: 1

      teenagers that want a new phone. Parents will replace it for them, if they believe the story about it being stolen, becauses they still need to maintain contact with them.

    5. Re:Stolen phones == customer fraud by crossmr · · Score: 1

      How is this remotely interesting. Is there any evidence at all to indicate what percentage of stolen phones are actually people trying ot get free upgrades? a half-guess isn't exactly interesting.

  12. Simpler by bytesex · · Score: 1

    The police used to do this in the Netherlands; when a phone was reported stolen, it would be sent an SMS every five minutes, saying: 'this phone is stolen'. That would require the thief to change the SIM card, which would make his action less than free (gratis).

    --
    Religion is what happens when nature strikes and groupthink goes wrong.
    1. Re:Simpler by cynicalmoose · · Score: 2, Informative

      But as anybody can locate a SIM in the cell to which it transmits, sensible thieves replace SIMs anyway.

      --
      Exercise your right not to vote. thinkoutside.org
    2. Re:Simpler by hankwang · · Score: 2, Interesting
      in the Netherlands ... would require the thief to change the SIM card, which would make his action less than free (gratis).

      Well, they used the IMEI number of the phone that is tied to the hardware, although someone with the rights skills might be able to change the flash memory where it's stored. (By the way, you can see the number by typing *#06#). It requires cooperation of the mobile phone providers though, that should have a blacklist of stolen IMEI numbers and take appropriate action as soon as a stolen phone connects to the network.

      If this is a private initiative, it seems unlikely that all providers are going to cooperate with keeping track of IMEIs. It's more likely to work by sending a special SMS message to the phone number, which can easily be circumvented by the thief if he recognizes that it is a "screaming" phone and replaces the SIM directly after the theft.

      And never mind that you have to figure out the call center phone number to report the loss because all your phone numbers are stored inside the handset. By the way, how is this going to help you get back your phone? The thief will get rid of the phone, and it might be found by someone. But you need a secure system to make sure that only the rightful owner can de-scream it.

    3. Re:Simpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It requires cooperation of the mobile phone providers though, that should have a blacklist of stolen IMEI numbers and take appropriate action as soon as a stolen phone connects to the network.

      A register of blacklisted IMEI numbers was part of the original design of the GSM network.
      But it was never put online, because blacklisting stolen phones is not in the interest of telephony providers. Stolen phones get a new SIM card and are used to make calls, thus generating profit for the providers. Disabling them would be foolish.

      So, when proposing an anti-theft scheme, be sure you do not need the cooperation of the providers.

    4. Re:Simpler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That must get very expensive, or do they have an unlimited text messaging plan?

    5. Re:Simpler by morie · · Score: 1

      It didn't work to replace the sim, they used the IMEI to identify the phone (no tech details on how to do that, sorry) and used a "SMS-bomb"

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments I post, 54 chars)
  13. It makes me think of... by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 3, Funny

    Screaming Jay Hawkins... "I put a spell on you, cause you're mine."

  14. Idiot Tax by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And you pay a premium idiot tax of 10 british pounds (that is 14 euros, or 19 dollars) - per month.

  15. How long till... by KTheorem · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How long will it be until something like this is implemented to "punish" those that are late on paying their bill or for people who decide they want to switch service providers?

    1. Re:How long till... by dabadab · · Score: 1

      Jesus, is this +5, Interesting?
      Of course that would be just as illegal as sending out hitmen in the abovementioned cases.

      --
      Real life is overrated.
    2. Re:How long till... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Of course its intersting. Low-jacks already do this in some cases. A friend of mine's car, which has a low-jack for 'security' reasons, though i fail to see why anyone would steal that POS, will very LOUDLY complain, lock you inside the car for a good 5 minuites when the bill isn't paid on time. I had the displeasure of this happening to me while driving her to work at 2am on the 1st of the month (before the bill was auto-processed)

      Seriously, in about 3-5 years time we WILL see this happening to late billpayers. It serves two purposes, cut down on thefts, and enforce payments. It will happen.

    3. Re:How long till... by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 1

      "Interesting" rating? o.0 Will the wonders of /. ever end?

      Lets see..

      Late paying: Service turned off... that sends a better message to the user alredy.

      Want to switch: If you switch inside your contract.. they already sock you with fees. And if you are switching providers.. you are probably also switching phones so that nulls that issue.

    4. Re:How long till... by gutnor · · Score: 1


      1. A mobile phone can be used to call 112, and international FREE emergency number (you don't need a SIM to call it). There will be several person that will sue the phone companies if they kill your phone while you need it.

      2. If your phone starts screaming in your car, that can lead to a crash ... again phone companies will be sued.

      In your case if you had been victim of a car crash (or sinking in water) and were unable to extract the car, the security company would have been sued into oblivion.

      Intimidation, personal or by a company, is a very good way to get into deep trouble.

  16. Stolen Phones not really an issue by Wiarumas · · Score: 0

    What kind of business idea is this? What are they gaining out of this? Essentially if a cell phone is lost or stolen then it is as good as gone. If it is this new high tech screaming cell phone and it is stolen or lost its basically as good as gone and doesn't give the theif the satisfaction of possessing a stolen cell phone. In the end, the customer is cellphone-less anyways and the business lost a potential customer (the theif).

    --
    I will bend like a reed in the wind.
    1. Re:Stolen Phones not really an issue by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      What kind of business idea is this? What are they gaining out of this? Essentially if a cell phone is lost or stolen then it is as good as gone.

      You miss the point. People are robbed, sometimes violently, for their phones everyday. If all phones had a system like this, there would be no point in robbing people of them.

      Police around the world are concerned about the value of the goods we are carrying. For the past ten years or so it's just really been cash, credit cards and mobiles that folk carried. Cash is less common now, credit cards are more 'secure' but increasingly we are carrying laptops, mp3 players and so on. Street crime will likely increase due to the increased profitability now. And as phones are one of the more overt gadgets (especially when in use), they make a good place to start in terms of making them less valuable to a thief.

    2. Re:Stolen Phones not really an issue by edusmoreira · · Score: 1

      Indeed.
      But that's a free rider problem on its purest form. /.ers mentioned the hysterical phone would be great if everyone owned it, but terrible to own in the individual basis, for false positives will occur in your board meeting or your final exams, subjecting you to a huge embarassment.
      Collective benefits, individual harm.
      No one will buy it.
      The market for this product is DOA, unless the government buys it for everyone.

    3. Re:Stolen Phones not really an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the UK, if you report a phone stolen it gets disabled on all networks at the IMEI level (like locking out the MAC address of a network card). IMEI numbers may be able to be changed with specialist equipment (which could be illegal) but is not available to a casual thief.

      The phone can be shipped to somewhere else in Europe, but I suspect that eventually operators across Europe will be required to use the blacklist.

      In general, stolen cell phones should have NO value at all.

    4. Re:Stolen Phones not really an issue by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      In the UK, if you report a phone stolen it gets disabled on all networks at the IMEI level (like locking out the MAC address of a network card). IMEI numbers may be able to be changed with specialist equipment (which could be illegal) but is not available to a casual thief.

      Changing the IMEI is illegal in the UK, they past legislation a year or so on this. However, changing it is trivial. I'd imagine that most of the small independent mobile shops (ones that sell pre-paid phones and accessories) would do it for you provided you asked in the right way. Failing that, all you need is a data cable for most phones. But this system could take it a step further; if the phone is disabled you might not be able to boot up to the point where you can change the IMEI. If it's designed right that is.

    5. Re:Stolen Phones not really an issue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      However, changing it is trivial. I'd imagine that most of the small independent mobile shops (ones that sell pre-paid phones and accessories)
      s/small independant shop/some paki chav on a market stall/
  17. Ohhhh, goodie! by Opportunist · · Score: 1

    Given the incredible security with cells these days, I can't wait for the next time I get pestered by some godforsaken ringtone in the movies and being able to replace the audible pollution with something else. Maybe more annoying, granted, but I do trust the owner that he will quickly shut down the phone. If not, he'll be removed from the theatre.

    I call that a win-win.

    --
    We used to have a Bill of Rights. Now, with the rights gone, all we have left is the bill.
  18. New terrorist weapon... by __aaclcg7560 · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine all the chaos that these screaming cell phones would cause in an airport or airplane? Terrorists will no longer need to physically blow up a plane to disrupt air traffic with these screaming babies going off.

    1. Re:New terrorist weapon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done, you win the idiotic slashbot comment of the week award.

    2. Re:New terrorist weapon... by z0idberg · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Dept. of Homeland Security called.

      They want their paranoia back.

  19. Who do the police arrest? by badfish99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    So someone stole a phone, and now it is making a very loud unpleasant noise. So they have dumped it near my house and it is still making the noice and I am very annoyed. So I hit it with a brick until it stops.

    Question: who gets taken to court? The phone manufacturer, for creating a noise nuisance? Or the thief, for stealing the phone? Or me, for damaging someone else's property?

    I know the answer: it will be me, won't it?

    1. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The brick manufacturer for making an unsafe product.

    2. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      just take the battery out... problem solved.

    3. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's a USian answer, you insentitive clod!!

    4. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Narcogen · · Score: 1

      Given that the noise means it was stolen, rather than smashing it with a brick you could simply disconnect the battery and turn it in to the police.

    5. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Given that the noise means it was stolen,

      Most people wouldn't know that...

      rather than smashing it with a brick you could simply disconnect the battery and turn it in to the police.

      Some people might assume it's some kind of bomb...

    6. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bricks don't break phones, people do.

    7. Re:Who do the police arrest? by tmjr3353 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, if they thought it was some kind of bomb I'd hope they wouldn't be chucking a brick at it to be honest.

    8. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Hehe.


      From far enough away, if they can aim (and then duck) well enough...

    9. Re:Who do the police arrest? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just disconnect the battery! No more sound. Duh.

      And be a good citizen and return the Cell to the police.

    10. Re:Who do the police arrest? by ArtStone · · Score: 1

      if you drop a screaming cell phone into a bucket of water, would it explode?

      --
      Final 2006 "Proof of Global Warming" US Hurricane Count -> 0
  20. but will get axed by friendly fire !! by fatcop · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I lost my mobile 3 times over a period of a few years. Yes the same one. Every time some saint returned it to the local police station and I'd get it back. Quite amazing considering the inner city area I live in Sydney.

    But I can just imagine them feeling all gooey inside about the good deed they are about to do ... then suddenly this phone starts screaming like a Blitzkreig air raid, and in the panic they stomp my phone into a fine power and run off traumatised !! Fat lot of good THAT feature would do me :)

    1. Re:but will get axed by friendly fire !! by Riktov · · Score: 1

      Your phones were lost, not robbed. If someone points a gun at you and demands your phone, you're not going to expect it to be returned by some saint, are you?

    2. Re:but will get axed by friendly fire !! by BadAnalogyGuy · · Score: 1

      I have faith in my fellow man.

    3. Re:but will get axed by friendly fire !! by acercanto · · Score: 1
      I have faith in my fellow man.
      Sucker!
      --
      You can have only two of the following three qualities when developing a product: cheap, fast or good.
    4. Re:but will get axed by friendly fire !! by o'reor · · Score: 1

      The correct answer is : "Amen, sucker !" ;-)

      --
      In Soviet Russia, our new overlords are belong to all your base.
  21. In other news... by zenmojodaddy · · Score: 1

    The estate of Edvard Munch plans to sue for breach of copyright.

    1. Re:In other news... by ridiculous · · Score: 1

      Yes, but his painting may not have been missing so long had it employed this technology.

  22. Too late! by Toreo+asesino · · Score: 3, Funny

    This isn't innovation! Anyone that lives in the UK will know that not only was this done yonks ago, but it even made it into the Top of the Pops when it came out.

    --
    throw new NoSignatureException();
    1. Re:Too late! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How was parent's post flaimbait? It's funny.

  23. can you imagine the mischief? by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    i am assuming that once a cellphone is stolen, they alert the cell provider to send the phone a signal. the provider probably just has a database and a set of commands to send

    so can you imagine the mischief if that provider's system is gamed/ hacked? and the mischief makers initiate a "call all cell phones" iteration?

    depending upon the percentage of cell phones that have this feature, you could cause mass havoc across the entire country

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:can you imagine the mischief? by MichaelSmith · · Score: 1
      so can you imagine the mischief if that provider's system is gamed/ hacked?

      I am sure that could happen now.

    2. Re:can you imagine the mischief? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why do they need to be hacked? HP has proven fairly convincingly that talking cell phone companies into thinking you're someone you're not is pretty darn easy. Social engineering is not terribly difficult these days.

      Now, consider this for a bonus. I call up Sprint and get someone I don't like's phone reported "stolen." Obviously, this has some immediate unpleasantness for him. It's embarrassing (especially if it happens at work, and moreso if he doesn't think to remove the battery at once).

      But it's also a long-term issue. Let's say he calls up the phone company and says "WTF???" The phone company will tell him "You reported it stolen." He will say "um..no I didn't. You broke my phone." How long do you think it will take for the phone company to admit it made a mistake? If you think this is less than the average human life expectancy, you've never dealt with a mobile phone company...

      Also, if the phone is truly rendered unusable permanently, will the average mobile phone company replace the phone in this situation? Or will they "blame the user" for their getting socially engineered and refuse to do so, making the victim out a phone?

      Sorry, I'd rather NOT put the long-term stability of my $300 invetment in the hands of people who have proven over and over again that they don't know or care who's at the other end of the phone telling them to do stuff.

    3. Re:can you imagine the mischief? by Alchemar · · Score: 1

      If they have that kind of access, what is to prevent them from just sending a call and text message to every phone at once. I think a bunch of different ring tones would be even worse than a single tone. Either way, they will be prosecuted as terrorist. No, I am not exagerating, their are already a few cases where someone was tried as a terrorist for messing with the phone system, because it might have prevented a 911 call from going through.

  24. Such old news the battery is dead by now by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 1, Redundant
    THis was on the Reg a good while ago. It was even on the New Zealand news site by this morning.

    News is supposed to be new.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:Such old news the battery is dead by now by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      New news on slashdot? Lawl. This is a site that regularly dupes stories from several YEARS ago.

  25. The obvious next step by Gerocrack · · Score: 2, Funny

    Screaming not annoying enough for you? The next version will randomly spew a stream of urine.

  26. I had this for 3 years already! by GoatSucker · · Score: 1

    Old news - I've had an app like this on my cell phone for the last 3 years, it's called PhoneSecure - http://www.wildpalm.co.uk/PhoneSecure.html

  27. how can this be good? by scheuri · · Score: 1

    First of all...when it can be turned on, it can be turned off again. Simple rule. I have a hard time believing that turning this thing off again is not possible.

    Second...why are cells stolen? Mainly because their sim card? I doubt it. Because people call their mobile company telling them the sim got stolen and it should be blocked or something. In other words, the sim card should be rendered useless. Therefore thiefs are after the mobile phone itself to sell it.
    Soooo...the only "harm" being done is, that you lost your mobile phone and data. Whereas data might be sensitive you MIGHT think about securing your mobile a bit better. It is the same with laptops in my opinion. If electronical devices care sensitive data, you look after them WAY better!

    I think this is just a way to increase cell phone sales!
    Why? Simple...if that screaming really can not be turned of easily enough then the cell phone is useless...to the thief as well as the righteous owner. So, beside of playing pranks to "friends" by turning on the screaming and making them buying a new cell anyway...a theft leads to a brand new cell.
    Just imaging you lost your mobile thinking it was stolen and you turn that screaming on...you lost a mobile phone.
    The way with all the text messages all over you ("this mobile got/is knicked") seems kinda better as the false positivs do not necessarily lead into a buy of a new mobile phone.

    Well, I dont like the idea...

    1. Re:how can this be good? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      It would be easy to design a cell phone that could irrevocably destroy itself upon external command. Internal fuses can be blown and the phone's firmware can be erased or disabled. I can think of several simple ways to do it.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    2. Re:how can this be good? by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      First of all...when it can be turned on, it can be turned off again. Simple rule.
      And like many simple rules, totally and utterly wrong.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  28. I hope not on a laptop by mikesd81 · · Score: 1
    The system also automatically backs up data held on a device once a day, meaning users can re-load their information onto a replacement handset.
    --
    That which does not kill me only postpones the inevitable.
  29. Sounds like, by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

    a time to trot out my connections, and link to my friend's startup that provides a similar solution.

    Here's the clincher, though: they even have a beta.

    1. Re:Sounds like, by mgblst · · Score: 1

      It looks like your mate uses a J2ME solution, which is really not up to scratch. It is so easy to stop j2me software from running, just press hangup. I am not sure that this will be able to disable the phone. I am hoping the article describes a hardware solution, much better option.

    2. Re:Sounds like, by The+Cydonian · · Score: 1

      While I haven't really discussed his product with him, nope, I don't think they do J2ME; it's something more internal than that. Symbian and Windows CE, basically.

      I've seen a demo of theirs on a Nokia 8860, and on a cursory glance, the shut-down seems to work rather elegantly. Now, I rightfully don't know if it's hack-proof or anything, but certainly, it's got more to do with merely switching the phone off (or disabling J2ME).

  30. Why spend the extra money (UK) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    If you live in the UK then you can register your phone (as well as other possessions) on a system called Immobilise http://www.immobilise.com/ which is actually supported by the UK police forces and doesn't cost a penny for a basic account. If you report the phone as stolen then the phones serial number is blacklisted and none of the mobile phone providers will provide service to that handset therefore rendering the handset useless. Sure, you might be able to get to the contacts etc with an inactive SIM on some phones but at least no-one else can use the phone to make calls etc. So, shall I spend an extra £120 or shall I use a free system which is endorsed by the police...?

  31. Phones already have a GUID !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hi,

    Cell phones (GSM at least) Already have a GUID which is transmitted all the time while the phone is switched on.

    It is easy for operators to track the position of a stolen cellphone down to about a meter if they wanted to.

    They have used this to track down the polish kid who knifed someone to death over an iPod.

    If you have a cellphone and it's switched on, it's transmitting a guid and position continuously, always.

    This is why I think the spat in the UK about ID cards is silly, most people in the UK own a cellphone and it's freely, continuously and permanently giving away their identity AND position.

    Anyways. in short, if someone stole your GSM and you tell the police it's attached to a drum of sarin gas, they *will find it* in no time.

    1. Re:Phones already have a GUID !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do believe that they can't track it without activity, which is why on the news you'll hear them say that a killer's last mobile phone _activity_ was near to the murder scene.

      Also, a pay as you go SIM card normally isn't linked to an identity.

    2. Re:Phones already have a GUID !! by commodoresloat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Depends what you mean by "activity." If the phone is on, it can be tracked.

    3. Re:Phones already have a GUID !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hi,

      > Also, a pay as you go SIM card normally isn't linked to an identity.

      It is very much linked to an identity when the phone spends 6-8 hours per day in the same house and spends workdays at same place of business.

      If you carry a cellphone for any length of time, your identity and position at any time are easy to deduce by anyone with access to operator logs.

      If you carry it anywhere near security cameras, the position, time and date result in a picture!

    4. Re:Phones already have a GUID !! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the gsm protocol isnt designed to sends it's position..
      they tracked down this kid in belgium, by disabling the gsm basestations..
      when a phone enters a area, it logs onto that 'cell'..
      the basestation can only view the signal strength, and posibly the direction.
      but when you shut down this station, the phone logs onto another station,
      which is also a border of the same cell.
      so if you do that twice, you have 3 positions(of the stations) and signal strengths,
      so you can calculate the distances to each of te stations, and you can guess the position.

      so i don't believe they track in which home the phone resides, and which job you attend..
      that's so 1984..

    5. Re:Phones already have a GUID !! by mdwh2 · · Score: 1

      This is why I think the spat in the UK about ID cards is silly, most people in the UK own a cellphone and it's freely, continuously and permanently giving away their identity AND position.

      And cellphones have to be registered with the state? Is there evidence that the state is tracking these things (the problem is not some random person could track them, it's about the very real fear that ID cards would be needed for every single use of public transport for example)? And are cellphones compulsory to own? Of course not - those paranoid about being tracked can not take a cellphone.

      Anyhow, you're debating with a giant strawman. Mostly the arguments against ID cards having nothing to do with this. Does a cellphone cost over £90, for no benefit to the user, is compulsory to buy, requires your details be put onto a database, and result in a prison sentence if you fail to notify for a damaged/lost/stolen phone, or fail to notify about changes in your details?

    6. Re:Phones already have a GUID !! by squiggleslash · · Score: 1

      Cell phones (GSM at least) Already have a GUID which is transmitted all the time while the phone is switched on.

      It is easy for operators to track the position of a stolen cellphone down to about a meter if they wanted to.

      Cellphones, including GSM phones, have a variety of Ids (the IMEI and the IMSI), but they're not transmitted "all the time"; they're periodically transmitted, such as when the phone is switched on, and when the phone moves from the range of towers connected to one Mobile Switching Center to another. The only time there's continuous transmission of the type necessary to trace a handset is when they're on a call.

      Another point to remember is that this solution is of limited value. The reason cellphones are stolen isn't because thieves need them, but because they have a high resale value when exported to other countries. All this pretty much guarantees is that a crook will turn the phone off immediately after stealing it.

      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  32. Car alarms anyone? by tehSpork · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just cynical, but somehow I am expecting to hear reports of these giving off false positives. For example: The T-Mobile rep who sold me my phone fat-fingered the number while getting everything set up, which resulted in screwing up both my service and the service of the person who owned the "new" number the rep had generated (more proof that typos are not reliable random number generators). Imagine that applied to these Cellphone alarms.

    I imagine car alarms sounded just as great on paper, but the number of false positives they generate is incredible (disclaimer: I think car alarms are a great deterrent and use one). If the misfire rate on these cellphone alarms was even a small issue it could face consumer rejection due to the fear of their Cellphone being a proverbial timebomb waiting to embarrass them in public, at work, or (in my case) in class. At least with a car alarm you don't carry your car with you (if you do please reply and explain how you accomplish this feat), so it generally won't be interrupting your board meeting or examinations if it goes off. I'm all about screwing people who steal my stuff, but not at the expense of me facing the same treatment for just owning the darn thing. :)

    1. Re:Car alarms anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      At least with a car alarm you don't carry your car with you ....


      In Soviet Russia, your car carries you!

    2. Re:Car alarms anyone? by leonardluen · · Score: 1

      what makes you think this would embarass people now when they are already too stupid to turn their phone off in places such as a movie theater?

  33. IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusable by mennucc1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Actually, if your phone is GSM, then you can already do that.
    First and foremost, you must write down your IMEI number. Simply type *#06# into your cell phone. It may look like: AA-BBBBBB-CCCCCC-D . That is the serial number of the phone, and it will not change if the SIM is changed. Write it down into a safe place.
    When your phone is stolen, report that number to the police. They will report it to the providers, that will lock down the cell phone for good; moreover, if the phone is ever turned on, they may be able to track the thief whereabouts, using standard cell tecnology; that, and an identikit, may actually help them arrest the thief.
    A friend of mine, (who is in IT business) did all of the above, and she really had the thief arrested and prosecuted.

  34. New ringtone? by SpiritNL · · Score: 1

    Is this not a great ringtone?

  35. That reduces theft how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Speaking as a professional cell phone theif, I tend to take the sims out as soon as I can, and wouldn't wait to check if a phone was this particular model before I lifted it.

    This has an effect on theft how?

    1. Re:That reduces theft how? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It doesn't. No more than car alarms have an effect on car theft (the thieves will just steal the one withot the alarm but the theft figures don't really go down). It sounds more like a customer relations excercise to me - protect *your* 'phone from being stolen rather than somebody else's

      What I don't understand is why they think that these 'phones won't just end up on eBay sold without a battery? Pity the poor sucker who buys one of these and puts the new battery in while walking home from the post office!

  36. awesome! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny
    First and foremost, you must write down your IMEI number. Simply type *#06# into your cell phone. It may look like: AA-BBBBBB-CCCCCC-D . That is the serial number of the phone, and it will not change if the SIM is changed. Write it down into a safe place.

    Excellent! I am writing the number down right now in the memo pad application on my cell phone!

  37. Trolling... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How long will it be until something like this is implemented to "punish" those that are late on paying their bill or for people who decide they want to switch service providers?


    That has to be one of the the worst Troll I have seen here in a long time.

    1. Re:Trolling... by REBloomfield · · Score: 1

      I switched telecoms providers recently, and my previous provider sends me at least one letter a week asking me if my service is better and telling me that i really should switch back, and look at all the shiny deals they've currently got..... He's got a vague point....

  38. Fortunately, cell phones are perfect... by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    ...Unlike computer, cell phone hardware and firmware are 100% bug-free and reliable, and wireless connections are digital and therefore perfect with no error rate at all. Therefore, we need not contemplate the possibility of false positives ever triggering this feature accidentally.

    Heck, why stop at an irritating noise? Have it trip a little relay that will short out the battery and make it explode. That will show them!

  39. Just a thought... by d3m0nCr4t · · Score: 1

    And how do you send a signal to your cellphone ? With another cellphone i suppose.

  40. "'Mobile' is where the money is"... by gjuk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is yet another one-trick pony. Basically, a few years ago, desperate investors, not yet burnt enough by the dotcom boom, realised they should be backing "mobile" ventures. Anything would do, as long as it was "mobile".

    Note that these guys charge £100 / year ($220). Given that the average mobile would cost £200 to replace (tops, brand new) and you get a free one every year or two with a contract - they are suggesting you pay an insurance premium of c. 50% of the phone value, for a phone which you'll probably be getting rid of soon - and which the networks will disable if you report stolen. Oh yeah, and you don't actually get the phone back, it just screams.

    To be fair - the real benefit is that it backs up the data on the phone; but if you're sensitive enough to spend £100/yr on this service, you ought to find a better way. The fact that this is "Home Office and Police backed" just goes to show how readily these agencies piss our money on pointlessness.

    1. Re:"'Mobile' is where the money is"... by foniksonik · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they are marketing this at execs who have minimum $600 phones and have data worth vast amounts of money in the right persons' hands stored within it.

      Also it's not important that it backs up the data... that's a bonus... it's important that it wipes the data on the phone immediately after backing it up.

      Think "This message will self-destruct in 10..." but instead of blowing up the phone (which could lead to a lawsuit) it wipes the data and makes the phone really annoying to be around.

      IMHO they should not have it activated later "by phone"... they should pair it with a bluetooth card you keep in your wallet or other more secure bodily stored location and trigger it upon disconnect, with the ability to turn it off via a phone call (yes slightly ironic but not as much as having to turn it ON by phone). People don't typically leave a 10 M proximity from their phone at any time.... so it should work pretty well and it could turn off automatically if it comes back into range and pairs up again.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  41. Leaked picture by Mathness · · Score: 1

    Leaked picture of the art on the retail box.

    --
    Carbon based humanoid in training.
  42. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by Vihai · · Score: 1

    The police will NOT track down stolen IMEIs. This is the problem. Even if it would be quite easy: look who the SIM owner is, look who is he calling, go there and put him in jail.

    What happens now? The IMEI (hopefully) is put in the blacklist, the thief changes the IMEI (yes, it is feasible on most phones), the phone works again.

  43. Good feature by pryonic · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It would be handy if I could remotely set this off for people who feel it's necessary to play tinny RnB MP3s through their phones on long train journies. The scream would probably sound better than that noise, or may convince them just to turn the damn thing off.

    Am I the only person that finds this new 'trend' amongst teenagers on trains antisocial and inconsiderate?

    --
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.
    1. Re:Good feature by CrazyTalk · · Score: 1

      I live in the US - we don't travel by train.

    2. Re:Good feature by k4_pacific · · Score: 1

      Back in my day, we would take hand cranked Victrolas onto the trolley over to Shelbyville. I'd tie an onion onto my belt, which was the style at the time, and board the trolley with a Victrola and some Bessie Smith cylinders. One time, the motorman got so annoyed that he swerved the trolley off a cliff. Singlehandedly defeated the Kaiser it did. Kids these days, with their cell phones and bell-bottom pants and polio vaccines. Hmmmppphhhh.

      --
      Unknown host pong.
    3. Re:Good feature by rizole · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      New trend? You've heard the Sony Walkman right? I had one, what, 20 years ago? Invented in 1977 according to wikipedia, that's a long trend.

      Dude, you just turned into your father. You'll be complaining that kids these days drive too fast, swear too much, think about nothing but sex and all take drugs next.

      Scarey new millenium shit teenagers being inconsiderate. Best just sit down and take a deep breath pops.

    4. Re:Good feature by johansalk · · Score: 1

      Oh God. Nothing annoys me more than those RnB MP3 ringtones.

    5. Re:Good feature by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      What's a train?

  44. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by bopo_the_mofo · · Score: 1
    Couple of things... not just GSM, but 3G phones too have an IMEI. Unfortunately, UK carriers do not properly implement network security, so they do not correctly keep records of who (person) owns what IMEI. The police MAY attempt to report the IMEI to carriers to cancel it, but it is not guaranteed, not least because number portability means that it is only usually possible to tell from an IMEI who the issuing carrier was, not the current carrier.

    You should also have to provide a lot of ID to do this.

    Just for info... the network 'sees' your phone as a combination of IMEI and IMSI (a similar number on the SIM card). Your phone number is just a human-friendly number allocated by the net. Blocking your IMEI does not block your number, or even render your SIM unuseable. Get a new phone, use the network backup facility (which you nerdily remembered to set up) to restore your settings/contacts etc and off you go.

    Just remember, kids, the ONLY way to make sure this works is to fill in that little user survey / guarantee card that comes with your phone and TELL YOUR NETWORK WHAT YOUR IMEI IS. Otherwise forget it.

    If every scum-sucker that stole a phone got it disabled within seconds this would soon stop.

  45. Old News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OK, so the screaming is a "new idea", but at least some phones have supported "remote brickification" for years. Blackberries come to mind, but there may be other.

    However, with any halfway-open phone OS, I'm not convinced that it wouldn't be possible to disable it. With Windows Mobile 5, I know that there is software out there already that claims to do this (although I'm sceptical). Anyone care to comment on how likely this would be with Symbian?

  46. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Informative

    Their are posters from the Met Police all over London telling people to write down their IMEI numbers and report them in the instance of theft. They're making more effort than they were.

  47. Expensive and useless by adpsimpson · · Score: 1

    From the fabulous article:

    Costing around 120 pounds ($224.3) a year the technology is not 100 percent fool proof however, with organized tech savvy thieves likely to have the equipment and know how be able to get round the security measures

    The phone is stolen, battery removed and it's taken to the wee booth at the back of the market (where they can already unlock phones, upgrade firmware, backup memory etc) and restored. The loud noise is only ever heard for about 20 seconds, while in the booth in the market (when it's conveniently stuck under a pillow). The owner, who's paid £600 (over $1000) over the last 5 years for the service, more than double the value of the phone, is left with less than if they'd played the old *#06# trick (available for years for free).

    Good to see the march of technology being put to good use.

    --
    Is crushing a suspect's child's testicles illegal?
    John Yoo: "No, [if] the President thinks he needs to do that."
  48. wouldn't be that much use by RMH101 · · Score: 0

    steal phone, remove sim card and replace with your own. Text messages are sent to the phone number, which is defined by the sim, not the handset.
    Unless this is a feature that works via IMEI number and uses some specialist software at the service provider's end...

    1. Re:wouldn't be that much use by malsdavis · · Score: 1

      "Unless this is a feature that works via IMEI number and uses some specialist software at the service provider's end..."

      Which it does...

    2. Re:wouldn't be that much use by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I realize people can't be bothered to RTFA...but how about RTFS?
      Last sentence of the summary - "Even replacing the sim card will not help."

    3. Re:wouldn't be that much use by Jaruzel · · Score: 1

      Phone numbers are like domain names, they are a translation layer for us humans, the real address is the IMEI number, which is actually where the SMS's get sent. So even if you replace the SIM card, the SMS message can still be sent to the stolen phone.

      pfft.

      -Jar.

      --
      Together, We Can Make Slashdot Better. I Do NOT Mod ACs. - Check Me Out
    4. Re:wouldn't be that much use by CheShACat · · Score: 1, Interesting

      But unfortunately IMEI numbers are almost as easy to change as the SIM - with a £5 cable off ebay and a quick bit of P2P software 'theft'. I did an old Motorola I had once just to see if I could.

    5. Re:wouldn't be that much use by suparjerk · · Score: 1

      CRIMINAL!

      --
      I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  49. Do this to the Wife's phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Can I do this to my wife's phone. She's always on it. All I would have to do is report it stolen :)

    I can imagine if the commands to turn this on got hacked. Everyone who got mad at their boss or former G/F would get revenge by using this feature. Imagine if it went off in an office or crowded building....

  50. Useless by Corwn+of+Amber · · Score: 1

    This is completely useless. A cell phone in UK is almost free (as in Guiness) if you accept it to be simlocked. Then you go at the cyberspace just above the cell shop, and get it unlocked and voilà : 3G phone with no restrictions for £30.

    Then someone steals it. Big Deal. Since it is 3G, you backed up your data... right? Thief has your data... So f*ing what? He knows you cheat on your wife and he's gonna blackmail you? "Hey, I just stole your phone, and..." and at this point he's got your trusty baseball bat in his face. Twice.

    It will cost you £30 more to replace the phone, period.
    And data get backed up and restored by bluetooth (unless you're too stupid to use such high-tech, in which case WTF are you having a 3G for?).

    Oh, just before I forget... How many people are actually unhappy enough with their PSP (Phone Service Provider) that they get it unlocked and switch? Or is it only so that you can pay three times more with a prepaid card?

    And, how comes people are stupid enough to steal phones in a country where they all are simlocked by default?

    --
    Making laws based on opinions that stem up from false informations leads to witch hunts.
  51. What a bloody good idea! by bratwiz · · Score: 1

    What a terrific idea! I hope these guys make a lot of moolah for their efforts. That would be a good idea for ipods, laptops, and lots of other personal electronics that so often get stolen. Its about time that somebody came up with a good idea for how to combat the problem. The cops sure don't have time to do it.

  52. Further Reports... by DavidD_CA · · Score: 1
    Further reports tell us that the "screaming" sound file to be played when the system is activated is a well-known quote from a popular movie:


    Listen to sample.

    --
    -David
  53. Simple Solution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wrap it in aluminum foil after you take it. That way it can't send or recieve signals.

  54. No good will come of this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    1) I would guess that out of all the mobile phones that their owners cannot find, a nontrivial number are actually found later on, as it was left in a coat pocket, recovered from the bus, left at a friend's house or similar.
    Out of these, a nontrivial number of owners are likely to use the 'screaming brick' function when they find it's gone.

    At this point their cries for 'permanent wipe of data and loud screaming' gains the suffix of 'but of course I naturally meant so that *I* can turn it off when I get my mobile back, aha'.

    2) Let's hope the signal isn't something that could be replicated with those kinds of mobile phone interceptors that send 'end call' signals. Or ungodly mess follows.

    3) In many cases, phone thieves have access to fairly sophisticated technology. I had my jacket stolen with a mobile in it once, and within an hour at least something was done to it (the error message when trying to call was neither a busy signal nor the 'the phone is switched off', but something with being not accessible).

  55. In the Sony Ericsson version... by ectal · · Score: 1

    The phone will attack the thief's vulnerable spots for massive damage.

    --
    http://nerdcartoons.com/
  56. Proximity Switches by TechGranny · · Score: 1
    I personally have always wondered why some cell phones did not have a little proximity switch much like an RFID thing. The proximity tag (RFID) could be put in ones wallet or handbag, or on ones personal effects.

    Set the distance on the phone, and then if you happen to leave the phone on the table where you just ate, and walk away, once the distance hits 5 feet or so the phone starts chirping or screaming..

    You would not believe how many cell phones I see misplaced like this, and people do not even know they forgot the phone, or where they did for that matter.

    For a couple more cents, and possibly even in conjunction with the highly annoying ringtone market, the manufactureres could make the warning customizable.

    Me: Finishes the opera and begins to file down aisle exiting crowded concert hall.

    Phone (talking in sexy voice after 5 feet is passed): Hey you sexy, do you want me? I want you! Come get me you devil. Don't leave me hanging...

    Me: Continues to walk away, unable hear the phone.

    Phone: (7 feet away now, and getting louder): Hey you absent minded deaf bastard at number (423) 745-3453 get your ass over here and collect your phone.

    Then if I am obviusly too distracted to get my phone this little screaming feature might come in really handy.

    --
    Make the world better. Quit hating.
  57. And it will be codenamed... by Overzeetop · · Score: 1

    ...The Aristocrat!

    (Oh, admit it - you knew the punchline before you read it)

    --
    Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
  58. Who called the police? by Secrity · · Score: 1

    In your juristiction, is it illegal to take a brick to a discarded telephone that you found near your house? I would imagine that the police would not involve you at all unless somebody calls the police and can identify you, or the police were to happen by while you were smahing the phone.

    Although these days, if the police saw you with a brick and a screaming cell phone, you probably needn't worry about going to court; they would probably just consider you to be a terrorist with a bomb. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4711021.stm

    1. Re:Who called the police? by Macthorpe · · Score: 1

      To save people clicking that link:

      1) It's very old news, and

      2) It's nothing to do with bricks and cell phones being linked to bombs.

      It must be very trying for you to remain relevant to the conversation.

      --
      "It does not do to leave a live dragon out of your calculations, if you live near him." - Tolkien
  59. Great, next step... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...small vial of acid (or similar nasty substance - chlorine gas, maybe) stored in phone. When phone is stolen, call phone to break vial and whatch the fun begin. OK, I'm not seriously suggesting that, but it *would* be kinda fun, in a sadistic way...

  60. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no kidding, if you live in phoenix, they won't even track down a stolen car...

  61. andypeach.swf by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    look that up on google. That would be the perfect scream.

  62. Yes, but... by Channard · · Score: 1

    ... there are also ways to unlock stolen phones. Where I think this screaming phone noise will come in handy is not in catching the thief themselves. No, it'll be more useful in prosecuting reprogrammers. After all, you can claim you didn't know a phone you unlocked was stolen, but you can't really ignore a phone that's making a colossal screaming noise, which makes it as stolen. Any doubt goes right out of the window.

  63. loud and obnoxious noises by crimperman · · Score: 1
    The signal tell the phone to wipe all of its data and begin emitting a very loud and obnoxious sound.


    Will anybody notice another 'phone making a loud and obnoxious noise?

    Most mobile phones already make loud and obnoxious noises, what with the ring-tones and this new "fad" of walking along with your 'phone playing tinny "music" to all and sundry!

    Ah - here's an idea perhaps we can report somebody whose 'phone is guilty of the above by reporting it stolen. Of course for that we'd need their number - any ideas how to get that?
  64. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've tried this. Where I live they don't track them unless the thieves are armed or violent when stealing the phone. If someone snatches the phone from your pocket or car, it won't be a priority and they won't track.

  65. A better name would be ... by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

    ... "Baby Phone" :-)

  66. My brother is a DA by spectrokid · · Score: 1

    ..and he sais serial numbers are the ONLY way of the police getting your stuff back. Where he works, the police holds a big database of serials of stolen stuff. If they bust a suspected thief, they check everything in his house against the database. So whenever you buy a flatscreen, PC, TV or whatever, ALWAYS write down the serial. I just take a picture of the ID plate, print it on a B/W laser, holds forever.

    --

    10 ?"Hello World" life was simple then

  67. How is that different from your average Londoner? by ChePibe · · Score: 1

    I mean, if you've ever ridden the tube, you've learned to live with that already...

  68. Anybody got the link? by muellerr1 · · Score: 1

    I need a new ringtone.

  69. Halloween 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They should use that atrocious jingle: "Six more days till halloweeen, halloweeen, halloweeen! Six more days till halloweeen, Silver Shamrock!"

    Sorry if you're stuck with that tune in your head now.

  70. If you really want your phone back... by Dr.+Spork · · Score: 1
    Yeah, I was thinking exactly the same thing: I don't see how this alarm ads anything to your security! I mean, the first thing the thief will do is smash your phone if it starts making a terrible noise. Much better would be this: When it detects that it's stolen, it makes a calls the service provider to check its location - and maybe then reports its own sim card # and model # at an automated police voicemail number. Then it would just get stuck showing the following message: "Please place this phone in a mailbox and mail it to the following address [house address of the local police station]." (I first thought the address could be to your own home, but I don't think you want a thief to know this. And if they think that it is your home address and they mistakenly drive themselves to the police station, that's fine.)

    I think this would leave you with a much higher chance of actually recovering the phone after it's been stolen. And isn't that the point? Maybe you have pictures, numbers or other data that you don't want to lose. And that stuff is almost definitely toast if your phone just starts honking like crazy.

  71. Am I missing something? by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 1

    Last I checked, the majority of cellphone thefts are not for the phone; rather they're for the SIM card so the thief (or another related party) can make phone calls at least until the original owner realizes the SIM's gone, or until they manage to run the gamut of cell provider's customer support lines and get it disabled.

    Honestly, my phone is not that valuable to me. I don't keep any data on it that I don't back up... and while it would suck to lose my phone (because of the cost of replacement), I'm more concerned about people racking up minutes on my number before I get a chance to cancel.

    There's not really a great used market for cell phones... they're pretty much out of date at release these days. Though I agree cellphones are stolen, they're generally not for the phone itself.

    1. Re:Am I missing something? by Detritus · · Score: 1

      There's a huge market for the export of stolen phones. Where do you think that they get all of the cheap second-hand phones sold in third-world countries?

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
  72. Nokia by MBHkewl · · Score: 1

    I have a Nokia Communicator 9500 and it has an option called Remote Locking, where the owner specifies a password. Later on, if someone stole the phone, the owner sends an SMS message to the mobile and it instantly locks both the phone and the memory card.
    It even encrypts the memory card's contents.

    Yes, this is useless if the sim is changed, but the phone also employs another option to lock mobile phone if the SIM card is changed.

    Is it really necessary to delete all data and pierce the ears of the innocent?

    --
    Mod points are a dangerous tool. Abuse them wisely.
  73. This phone by Philip+K+Dickhead · · Score: 1

    Sounds an awful lot like my first wife.

    --
    "Speaking the Truth in times of universal deceit is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell
  74. If screaming isn't enough by chord.wav · · Score: 1

    What about making the battery of the phone explode in the thief's pocket?

    Disclaimer: Any Sony reference is purely coincidental. No batteries or global evil empires were harm in the making of this post.

  75. What if it wasn't stolen, just lost. by Dissenter · · Score: 1

    I guess it's an easy way to find my phone when I loose it in the house. I can always re-sync the numbers from my PC. That is, unless you can't turn off the "stolen scream." If that's the case I promise you have at least 2 screaming phones every day standing in line for service at the local dealer because they thought the phone was stolen, but found it under the bed or something. What aout the moron that leaves their phone at the office. Everyone is quietly working and a cell phone that was left at work starts to scream... This sounds like something that is going to be deemed a pain in the ass very quickly, but it will be hillarious while it lasts.

    --

    Dissenter
    "There is no knowledge that is not power."

  76. Ironic that by foniksonik · · Score: 1

    You have to call in that your phone is stolen... ;-p

    A real British comedy would be someone getting their phone stolen and then stealing someone else's phone to call in their report which would lead to that person stealing a phone to call in the theft of their phone and so on... and they all get hauled in to the station and have to explain what happened.... all bloody yelling at each other and the cops about what a degenerate society they live in... roll credits ;-p

    --
    A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  77. Enabling the signal can be helpful - or painful by psybre · · Score: 1

    Please keep me away from dense urban areas where these phones are used. If the signal is ever distributed through a virus...

    ~psybre

    --
    Authority questions you. Return the favor. -- d474
  78. friends, family? by Speare · · Score: 1

    Just wait for the court cases when friends or family are injured by these booby-trapped phones. They borrowed/found the phone, and someone forgot to tell/remind/remember that the loan/find took place, or the borrower/finder tries to call the owner's other line to return it.

    --
    [ .sig file not found ]
  79. Get those teens back. by megaditto · · Score: 1

    Fill out a Congressional page application on their behalf.

    --
    Obama likes poor people so much, he wants to make more of them.
    1. Re:Get those teens back. by jlowe · · Score: 1

      You misspelled "feel"

  80. conjugate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The signal tell the phone What you say?

    1. Re:conjugate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What you say?
      Someone set up us the screaming mobile.

    2. Re:conjugate by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1

      All of your treble are belong to us!

      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  81. Most 'stolen' phones are lost by scruffyMark · · Score: 1
    By far the most common thing is for people to misplace their phones - leave them in a restaurant, on a bus, whatever. And people being largely honest, they are quite often returned.

    Now imagine if every good samaritan had to put up with the damn thing screaming, and everyone staring at them thinking "thief"... You can forget getting your phone back now! The logical course on finding a misplaced phone will be to smash the thing to smithereens now, so it can't start screaming at three AM and wake up everyone in the neighbourhood.

    Of course, this will be good for the cellphone makers and telcos - people will get their phones back less, buy more replacements, and sign on to long contracts in order to save a bit of money on the phones.

    --

    What is the robbing of a bank, compared to the founding of a bank? -- Bertolt Brecht

  82. border states and cars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that's because your car is on the way to mexico and the cops don't want to be accused of racism or being insentive to multiculturalism. You see you are occupyng land stolen from la raza and they take your car as part of the reparations. You should be proud to donate it to assuage your part of the collective guilt.

    Did you know the federal attorney general is a member of la raza?

  83. Yes, I'ts called FELONY MURDER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doesn't require intent to kill, just that the result of your actions resulted in someone dying. For example, you grab some lady's purse that has her heart pills it it, and she dies cause you took her medicine. Actually you'd probably have to steal it at gunpoint, because the crime has to be a felony to count.

  84. Have it go off in an overhead compartment by gelfling · · Score: 1

    When you're taking off or landing. That way it's a Federal Crime if you get up to fix it. The loud noise will of course be construed to be terrorism. Old people and soccermoms will freak out. Some swarthy dude will get tasered. A fun time will be had by all. Let's Roll, Bitches.

  85. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by OfNoAccount · · Score: 1

    Of course, that doesn't stop the thief from merely changing the IMEI.

    Sure it's an extra step, and on some handsets it will require a bit of soldering, but on most it's doable with a data cable and the relevant software. Here in the UK it's also illegal to change the IMEI, but if you've already stolen the handset...
    http://www.unlockme.co.uk/blacklist.html

  86. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by suparjerk · · Score: 1

    Lucky friend of yours. In my experience, my cell provider didn't give a fuck about getting me my phone back. They just wanted to help me buy a new handset and plan from them.

    T-Mobile: you get what you pay for.

    --
    I caught the Mountain Wumpus! He gave me his treasure chest ($100) to let him go free again.
  87. Trunked Radio Systems do this by deeLo57 · · Score: 0

    This isn't any different than what Police do with "Lost" Radios If the police agency is on a digital trunked system (Typically Motorola) then they just assign the lost device to a specific talk group (lostRadiotalkGrp) and then constantly transmit a looped message to that talk group ("The radio you have is property of XYZ police, please return the equipment to the nearest station for a $50 dollar reward thank you")

  88. Already exists by puregen1us · · Score: 1

    I've seen programs with this sort of functionality before for Symbian several years ago.

    However, you end up paying a premium for a function that will at most prompt the thief to through their new phone out the window. If your phone is stolen then you want it back, I don't care otherwise, I don't want to spend money to not have it.

  89. Sweet by localman · · Score: 1

    I think this is a great idea... assuming that they make it difficult to trigger by accident or hacking (am I assuming too much?). More than my cell phone, I wish they'd do this with iPods. Even without wireless they could make it only happen on sync. If they did that, I wonder how long it would take for thievery to become less desirable. It would have to be pretty consistant to work.

    Cheers.

  90. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by internewt · · Score: 1

    Ahh, but if stolen mobiles in the UK couldn't work, then there'd be a lot less mobiles available amongst the population. Fewer mobile phones means fewer phone calls made, and as the operators charge by time on the phone, working stolen phones=profits for the operators. I should think that is one of the reasons why an IMEI dbase is not more efficient.

    As for returning guarentee cards, no thanks. The phone operators can easily determine your usual phone's IMEI number anyway, and they also have that info recorded anyway: I once entered my SIM's PIN wrong 3 times and locked it out. To undo this, I had to key in the IMEI number. To get this, I phoned my operator (from a friend's phone), gave them my phone number (and maybe some more info, or confirmed info) and they gave me the IMEI number. All this was done in a pub.

    --
    Car analogies break down.
  91. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They're making more effort than they were. Eek! It's the attack of the ambiguous pronouns!

  92. What the Crap?!! by AvyTech · · Score: 1

    Maybe I'm just sleepy or suffering from Mt. Dew withdrawal, but I don't get why anyone would buy such a phone unless it were to be used as a gag gift... A really expensive gag gift. And just how the crap DO you disable it when you realise you just dropped your phone in the couch? No longer able to tolerate the shrieking ear abuse, do you just kill yourself? Is there no end?

    --
    -- me
  93. two issues by AlgorithMan · · Score: 1

    first: what if I get my screaming phone back? it won't ever stop screaming so it'll be completely worthless - you most certainly won't even catch the thief, since he'll throw it away... the only effect will be that the thief won't use the phone

    second: what if someone cracks the signal? he might send the signal to each and every cell phone, making all those cell phones unusable and worthless...

    --
    The MAFIAA is a bunch of mindless jerks who will be the first up against the wall when the revolution comes
  94. Bad idea by twistedfuck · · Score: 1

    Sounds like a good way to get UK thieves to throw your cell phone in the thames. Presumably the owner would prefer to get it back.

    A better idea might be to lock up the phone and have it display a number the owner can be reached at and maybe a reward amount for returning it.

    1. Re:Bad idea by Bloke+down+the+pub · · Score: 1
      Sounds like a good way to get UK thieves to throw your cell phone in the thames.
      No, it sounds like a good way of stopping them from stealing by preventing them getting any income from it.


      Geographical note: if a thief in Newcastle could throw a phone into the Thames, I sure wouldn't argue with him.

      A better idea might be to lock up the phone and have it display a number the owner can be reached at and maybe a reward amount for returning it.
      That sounds like a good way to encourage worthless dirtbags to steal them in the first place.
      --
      It's true I tell you, feller at work's next door neighbour read it in the paper.
  95. Has already been done. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1
    "We also then set a small bomb off, if you like, that completely wipes the data...
    As well as the ear and most of the face of the thief? Seems a little harsh.
    Somebody, allegedly Israeli intelligence, uses this approach to assasinate suspected terrorist leaders and/or bomb makers.
    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  96. Can't wait to hear THIS in a concert hall. by fishbowl · · Score: 1

    Every generation of the cell phone gets more annoying. And I cannot remember the last
    orchestral concert I attended where someone didn't let a cell phone ring.

    One of these was a composer's premiere that was being recorded and STILL, someone ruined it with a cell phone... three different times...

    I can't wait until we get cell phones that will make a *really* loud noise and cannot be turned off at all.

    --
    -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  97. I felt a disturbance. It was as if... by SimDarth · · Score: 1

    thousands of cell phones screamed out at once. Oh, wait... it was just an average day in LA.

  98. Nobody wants more noise pollution. by the_REAL_sam · · Score: 1

    And noise pollution is all they've added to that phone.

    I just found two cell phones in the past 2 weeks. Both of them were just lying in the road. I returned both of them. One of them I gave to a cop, and, with the other one, the owner called his phone and I handed it back to him. In the second case, receiving his call and returning his phone was easy, SINCE I HAD NO INCENTIVE TO DISCONNECT THE BATTERY; his phone wasn't screeching at me.

    I guess you could say the shriek is for cases when the phoneloser calls and the finder hangs up. But silencing the phone is better than that, and possibly more effective. To reactivate a silent phone, make the finder take the phone to a service branch, and, if lost or stolen, the newly-reactivated phone could be mailed to the owner.

    --
    "Forgive us our trespasses, as we forgive those who trespass against us." -Jesus Christ The Lord's Prayer
  99. Clever trick by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simply type *#06# into your cell phone
    Yeah yeah, nice try. Everyone knows that's the secret "I've been stolen" code to make me disable my own phone, you're not going to fool me that easy!!

  100. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by thegameiam · · Score: 1

    Hmm - on a Samsung x427m with Cingular GSM, #06# resulted in "not done."

    --
    Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise!
  101. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Hmm - on a Samsung x427m with Cingular GSM, #06# resulted in "not done."

    Put a star in front of it.

  102. This is TOTALLY WICKED! by Humorless+Coward. · · Score: 0

    It's daft simple to get a cellphone without using your own real, personal information.
    I recommend leaving one of these phones in the bin at the TSA checkpoint in a US airport.
    Then call to send the signal to set the phone on scream.

    Enjoy:)

  103. The weakest link. by Tavor · · Score: 1

    The weakest link will still be the human element. Suppose:

    *Cell phone stolen.
    *Real owner sets off the "OMFG-Screaming-Harpies" function.
    *Thief gets annoyed, takes it to 'Brand-X' store.
    *Thief 'social engineers' the store clerks, saying it went off "accidently" and needs to be reset.

    You can see where this is going.

    --
    Windows has detected an undetectable error.
  104. Re:IMEI, Re:Who cares if the phone becomes unusabl by bopo_the_mofo · · Score: 1

    Phone theft is a fairly high percentage of personal crime, but stolen phones generate a low percentage of revenue for the operators. It IS in their interests to stop phone theft, cloning and other crimes: none of them want the attention of the regulatory authorities on this issue.

    For what it's worth, I'm a front end architect in the phone industry. I'm not just talking out of my trousers here.

    On your other point, yes, they can get your IMEI and ban your phone based on the number. And, as you said 'maybe some more info, or confirmed info'. There's the ID I said you'd need.

    You may already have provided this when you got your contract deal. On the other hand, for a Pay As You Go purchase the only way the opco know this is for you to have sent in the guarantee card (or registration card, or similar). Without this they simply cannot attach you personally to the number, and therefore cannot ban the IMEI which matches the numher. ...Or maybe this would turn into the best ever practical joke, and you could get your mates' mobiles banned just from knowing their phone number...

  105. Hey what's that sound? by SoopahMan · · Score: 1

    Sounds like that cell phone's got data to steal - good thing they put that sound on it to alert thieves to its readiness and location.

    I need to start designing cell phones... how do so many terrible ideas like this make it to market?