Nissan skyline 4 banger, 4 wheel power, so much antislip tech they come off the line faster than everything. Muscle isn't everything. Then again, I'd love to have a `93 mustang cobra.
Without their cache, these modern chips amount to nothing. They are no good unless you have something filling the pipeline with the next instruction. Take your k-spiff pentium III 950 and turn off cache. Boot windows. Have fun in your misery. THis is how I slow games enough to play them on my 450. Gabriel knight works just fine without cache.:)
that's interesting, but you could have just put junkbuster proxy on your system, and set up the block file like this:
doubleclick.net flycast.net /ad*/ etc...
It would save you a lot of trouble, since dblclick changes its server names around to different schema from time to time. I prefer to block the whole domain.
And also DUI is a national industry. Everyone who is tagged for DUI is usually sent to a "Track 2" program where they must participate, and they must pay for. The class is bs, as it is pretty much a "scared straight" or high school detention in nature. Did I mention this is a multi-billion dollar industry? no better monopoly than the government.
Be careful using up your VDE resources while in shell. Also, if you write a custom script, make sure it doesn't spawn subshells, or it will easily chomp 255 vde units at a time. Set your max run to 5-10 and you should be ok.
I'd personally settle for EPIC to not call it "cookiegate". We have "Monicagate", "Chinagate", "travelgate", etc. You'd think we could come up with a suffix NOT related to the Watergate hotel. That's why it's called the "Watergate scandal". Since cookies are not related to breakins of the watergate hotel, they should find a new name. mumblegrumble pissondis.
It has nothing to do with your settings. Yes, they could say that, but the standard has a way to simply override and accept.
This system does NOT NOT NOT send out your information for you! It is not a "wallet" program! It informs you of site policy, should you want to sign up. It does not sign you up indiscriminately. that is up to you.
You sound like someone who actually read the spec or listened to the report yesterday on NPR. Good. This program/initiative seeks to make sites take responsibility for their actions when selling names. Nobody likes a welcher. You can refuse to enter data on most sites, and still get something out of it./. doesn't require you to login, but if you want a name, you have to give up the comodity of information (which has never been abused so far.) which they do not resell.
The P3P standard is being developed to let users decide how much of the data their computer will give up about them.
It has nothing to do with PGP, even though it begins and ends with P. btw, so does PHP and PCP. I don't think anyone is confusing those with PGP either. It is not an encryption technology, but a policy technology.
It would send out a PICS-like code to a user, and it would match to user preferences to check for violations of personal security rules.
This would let people collect a certificate that states "this site (will|will not) (sell|share) you information. Information is kept for (foo) months." If visitorse have a problem in the future that they think is a result of visiting this site, or accuse the site of violating their stated terms, they have evidence by which to prove it.
There really aren't many implementations available yet, aside from some of you usual startup-of-one-purpose companies.
This is a consumer protection measure intended to keep governments (particularly the pesky US) from passing yet more laws that don't work.
This was reported on NPR yesterday. Some folks form junkbusters commented on it saying it was a good idea to take back personal information, but more needs to be done to ensure enforcement, or the whole system would fail.
I needn't remind anyone that using junkbuster with cookie protection is usually enough for most privacy addicts.
Cb {c flat) -- it seems much more appropriate, since it is destined to fall flat.
It's c-like and Java-like? Here I was thinking java is like c. So to me, c# is like c.
Also, a music metaphor is simply a stupid play, especially when we are programmers, not musicians.
If I recall correctly, M$ made a visual J++ that was their version of java. It didn't involve an analagous transformation like c -> c++ (objects) but rather a closer tie to the M$ paradigm.
Since "innovation" and "plagarism" seem to mean the main thing when M$ is concerned, I guess they didn't consider this an issue.
Didn't "cool" stand for "C object oriented language" or some rubbish?
I'm certain we could find some epathet for this one too, ala "wince"...
What I can't believe is that PETA didn't go for the ORG TLD in the first place! They are a (supposedly) non-profit lobbying group, and as such they should have grabbed the peta.org domain straight off. PETA.COM is rather a lame domain for something that tries to appear as a grass roots lobbying group. I would have no objection to a peta.com leading to a company, but I have a problem with it pointing to a non-profit. Didn't TLDs have enforcement at some point in the past?
Well, yes. It appears to be some sort of aesthetic given that white people are in porn. Perhaps a lot of it comes from America where the census puts whites at 70-80% of the population. Or perhaps idiots post messages on usenet that say "don't post ugly n*gger b*tches!" to intimidate the posting of only whites. There seems to be a problem here, but it's most likely that white women/men have higher opinions and half the magazines contain whites. Go figure.
This is like the memex posited by Vannevar Bush. It was a system to organize all of your notes based upon a pre-hyperlink concept. It would be a series of documents on supermicrofische accessable by record numbers like the hyperlinks of today. Very cool, but I don't know if it is invalidating.
Actually, you are guilty of the sin of mis-appropriating parody as criticism. I'm making fun of Katz, not being critical of him. There is a difference.
It was meant to be a troll, if that's what you are implying. I just wish it actually went by totals. the actual total of the response is 6. It started at 2, got 6 points, dropped 2, and should now be 6. sounds like it doesn't go beyond 5 or it is broken by not re-totaling everything. Blame the moderators for pointing it out, and for you reading it. It was funny or interesting by the estimation of 6 moderators. it was "overrated" by two of them. I win. nyah.
Is it novell?
No, it seems more like NT: as usable as religion with a spattering of buzzwords. nothing like novell.
security by obscurity is never the answer. You could change the port, but a cracker would simply need to portscan you.
Nissan skyline 4 banger, 4 wheel power, so much antislip tech they come off the line faster than everything. Muscle isn't everything. Then again, I'd love to have a `93 mustang cobra.
Without their cache, these modern chips amount to nothing. They are no good unless you have something filling the pipeline with the next instruction. :)
Take your k-spiff pentium III 950 and turn off cache. Boot windows. Have fun in your misery. THis is how I slow games enough to play them on my 450. Gabriel knight works just fine without cache.
portmium
gritsium
Thank you.
(just kidding, It's a great name, really.)
nevermind.
If you read even the first page you will find out Fenne wasn't a preacher. But who needs editorial control anyway?
that's interesting, but you could have just put junkbuster proxy on your system, and set up the block file like this:
doubleclick.net
flycast.net
/ad*/
etc...
It would save you a lot of trouble, since dblclick changes its server names around to different schema from time to time. I prefer to block the whole domain.
Yes, and that's why all my junkbuster configs have "doubleclick.net" in the cookieb file. Nothing from dblClick gets through.
And also DUI is a national industry. Everyone who is tagged for DUI is usually sent to a "Track 2" program where they must participate, and they must pay for. The class is bs, as it is pretty much a "scared straight" or high school detention in nature. Did I mention this is a multi-billion dollar industry? no better monopoly than the government.
Be careful using up your VDE resources while in shell. Also, if you write a custom script, make sure it doesn't spawn subshells, or it will easily chomp 255 vde units at a time. Set your max run to 5-10 and you should be ok.
I'd personally settle for EPIC to not call it "cookiegate". We have "Monicagate", "Chinagate", "travelgate", etc. You'd think we could come up with a suffix NOT related to the Watergate hotel. That's why it's called the "Watergate scandal". Since cookies are not related to breakins of the watergate hotel, they should find a new name. mumblegrumble pissondis.
from The spec:
This was exactly what I was looking for.
It has nothing to do with your settings. Yes, they could say that, but the standard has a way to simply override and accept.
This system does NOT NOT NOT send out your information for you! It is not a "wallet" program! It informs you of site policy, should you want to sign up. It does not sign you up indiscriminately. that is up to you.
From the email Ton sent out to c-key owners:
blender 2.0 will make money from this boxed set. Sounds like a linux distro model.
I cannot wait for my tutorial guide!
You sound like someone who actually read the spec or listened to the report yesterday on NPR. Good. This program/initiative seeks to make sites take responsibility for their actions when selling names. Nobody likes a welcher. You can refuse to enter data on most sites, and still get something out of it. /. doesn't require you to login, but if you want a name, you have to give up the comodity of information (which has never been abused so far.) which they do not resell.
Isn't that "There are two kinds of people: People who categorize people into groups, and people who don't"?
The P3P standard is being developed to let users decide how much of the data their computer will give up about them.
It has nothing to do with PGP, even though it begins and ends with P. btw, so does PHP and PCP. I don't think anyone is confusing those with PGP either. It is not an encryption technology, but a policy technology.
It would send out a PICS-like code to a user, and it would match to user preferences to check for violations of personal security rules.
This would let people collect a certificate that states "this site (will|will not) (sell|share) you information. Information is kept for (foo) months." If visitorse have a problem in the future that they think is a result of visiting this site, or accuse the site of violating their stated terms, they have evidence by which to prove it.
There really aren't many implementations available yet, aside from some of you usual startup-of-one-purpose companies.
This is a consumer protection measure intended to keep governments (particularly the pesky US) from passing yet more laws that don't work.
This was reported on NPR yesterday. Some folks form junkbusters commented on it saying it was a good idea to take back personal information, but more needs to be done to ensure enforcement, or the whole system would fail.
I needn't remind anyone that using junkbuster with cookie protection is usually enough for most privacy addicts.
Cb {c flat) -- it seems much more appropriate, since it is destined to fall flat.
It's c-like and Java-like? Here I was thinking java is like c. So to me, c# is like c.
Also, a music metaphor is simply a stupid play, especially when we are programmers, not musicians.
If I recall correctly, M$ made a visual J++ that was their version of java. It didn't involve an analagous transformation like c -> c++ (objects) but rather a closer tie to the M$ paradigm.
Since "innovation" and "plagarism" seem to mean the main thing when M$ is concerned, I guess they didn't consider this an issue.
Didn't "cool" stand for "C object oriented language" or some rubbish?
I'm certain we could find some epathet for this one too, ala "wince"...
All the same, I'd rather call it cb
iOpener, $100. This is the price of what 6 hits of crack?
iOpener service, $20/mo. You can go without your crack just once, can't you?
It may be hard to get a phone line in a crate though..
those both point to user 7654.
That is a curious number...
Slashdot is not unix.
What I can't believe is that PETA didn't go for the ORG TLD in the first place! They are a (supposedly) non-profit lobbying group, and as such they should have grabbed the peta.org domain straight off. PETA.COM is rather a lame domain for something that tries to appear as a grass roots lobbying group. I would have no objection to a peta.com leading to a company, but I have a problem with it pointing to a non-profit. Didn't TLDs have enforcement at some point in the past?
Well, yes. It appears to be some sort of aesthetic given that white people are in porn. Perhaps a lot of it comes from America where the census puts whites at 70-80% of the population. Or perhaps idiots post messages on usenet that say "don't post ugly n*gger b*tches!" to intimidate the posting of only whites. There seems to be a problem here, but it's most likely that white women/men have higher opinions and half the magazines contain whites. Go figure.
This is like the memex posited by Vannevar Bush. It was a system to organize all of your notes based upon a pre-hyperlink concept. It would be a series of documents on supermicrofische accessable by record numbers like the hyperlinks of today. Very cool, but I don't know if it is invalidating.
Actually, you are guilty of the sin of mis-appropriating parody as criticism. I'm making fun of Katz, not being critical of him. There is a difference.
It was meant to be a troll, if that's what you are implying. I just wish it actually went by totals. the actual total of the response is 6. It started at 2, got 6 points, dropped 2, and should now be 6. sounds like it doesn't go beyond 5 or it is broken by not re-totaling everything. Blame the moderators for pointing it out, and for you reading it. It was funny or interesting by the estimation of 6 moderators. it was "overrated" by two of them. I win. nyah.