I have an Oculus Rift and had a DK2, and to be honest I was skeptical of gaming in VR at the current iteration of the technology as it gets tiring in the long run and a lot of the games are more tech demos than real games.
But then I played Elite:Dangerous (space sim) and later The Unspoken (fireball-tossing wizard duels in multiplayer). These are games where that sense of presence that VR offers is used to mind-blowing effect. Especially in E:D, as VR allows a real sense of *scale*. I never thought about this before I tried E:D, but flying into a space station that is over a km long really gives you a "holy crap that this is huge"-feeling. And you really feel that you are sitting *inside* of your ship, which is oddly pleasing.
The same for The Unspoken. Using Oculus touch controllers you really feel that the hands you see in-game are your own, and the first time I saw my right hand burst into flame as I was charging up a fireball was another of those "holy crap" moments.
Once developers get a better handle on how to make VR games it's going to become a serious segment of gaming. We see early signs of this already, as E:D and Unspoken demonstrates, but there is still some way to go (and possible a couple of HW iterations) before it becomes a serious platform in terms of users and revenue. And I'm not ruling out another short-term crash/flop if the next iteration takes too long, or developers can't come up with better experiences before users' patience runs out. We're not there yet, but VR is just too much fun to go away permanently.
Perhaps it has always been like this, people who vote similarly read the same news sources and congregate with like-minded people only. The internet just makes groups bigger and makes these behaviours more obvious to the observer.
Probably Mr Goatse was right all along.
You're probably right, but at the risk of falling into the "everything was always better before" trap, I can't help but think that even if you used to read a right-of-center newspaper, you would get differing viewpoints, some not following general orthodoxy. A "perfect" algorithm that can with a very high degree of certainty give you what you most want to read could create the feeling that the world is *exactly* as you think. The only conclusion then, when meeting people who disagree, is that they must all be idiots...
What worries me more than social media becoming the primary source, is the idea that we should only read be interested in things we are already interested in.
We're in a period of strongly polarized opinions where the idea of political discourse seems to be that you and me sit alone on our respective mountaintops and yell at each other. It bloody important to read news that doesn't fit your existing opinions or interests, how else will you ever question them? Or get new ones?
I try to make a point of reading news sometimes from sources who's political alignment I clearly disagree with. It's annoying and refreshing (and allows me to smugly roll my eyes at the world occasionally). And just once every blue moon, I actually change my opinion or discover something interesting. In an ever more complex reality, we need more viewpoints, not fewer, and I'm worried that algorithmic filtering of news feels like a boon but is actually really detrimental to us all.
Developer only? What is that non-sense? The TrimSlice ships with Ubuntu ready to use. ~$200 for the feature set is a steal, IMO. Not happy without a Dell logo or something? What's the problem with the TrimSlice?
Having spent a little under a decade in IT consulting (AIX/Solaris/Linux) I also ended up wanting to change. Not so much because I was fed up with doing what I was doing (I also felt I made ok money), but because I wanted to try something new. I also wanted to have a career with a higher income potential and more options of taking on quite different roles in the future. I'm a little surprised only two comments suggest what I did: get an MBA!
There are typically two points in your life when employers are less obsessed with only giving you a job that directly fits your background: when you've just graduated from university (where, at least at my university, only about one third accept jobs directly related to their field of study) and upon completing an MBA (where you apply for "MBA positions", many of which do not require any particular background). I really believe the MBA is the hands down best way of performing a radical career change *without* sacrificing salary of career progress - quite on the contrary: on average it will boost both quite nicely. It is also a very intersting study, covering fields I'd always been curious about and it's a great opportunity to meet peolpe from a myriad of backgrounds. The network and friendships I gained from my MBA is really the most valuable thing in the long run (come to think of it, when you're past 30, most of us don't make that many new close friends, but during the MBA I did, which was great).
Trying to get into a ranked MBA, which I really recommend to get some bang for your bucks, might seem quite dauting at first, but in truth it is easier than one might think. There are tons of things you can do to boost your chances to a point where you will be very likely to succeed - most of which Google can dig up for you.
Um, I must admit this sounds extremely strange, but perhaps things were that different 20 years ago. Today, banks shouldn't even admit to someone having an account with them until they have IDed themselves. In my case I have my standard current account with UBS (UBS is one of the biggest retail banks in Switzerland, unlike abroad where there are no retail branches to my knowledge), and I can tell you from experience that until they have had a long hard look at my passport, they won't even talk to me (much less give me money from a friend's account).
As for my employer, which is a classic traditional Swiss private bank, you would have your own relationship manager who knows you and follows you from you first enter the bank and for the duration of your relationship with us. All your contact with the bank, in person or otherwise, would go through him or her. I know of a case where a friend of mine's father was a client with another private bank, and she'd been meeting the relationship manager several times with her father in the past. Nevertheless, one time she was in Switzerland she decided to visit the bank to check on the account's performance, but as she was not formally listed as a co-owner of the account, the relationship manager refused any information, despite recognizing her.
I think your friend's experience was rather unusual - as a matter of fact, if your friend came to me tomorrow, and I volunteered information on your account, I would be guilty of revealing client information which carries a prison sentence as well as a nasty fine.
The Swiss are extreme when it comes to keeping people's privacy. Even your tax payments (tax at source/quellensteuer) is anynomized before your company hands it over to the tax authorities on your behalf if you have a direct taxation/tax at source arrangement.
A quick comment on the numbered accounts though: one benefit of the numbered accounts which I failed to mention is that even internally in the bank, only a handful of people know who hides behind the number, which means that even though you are on file with the bank and still must idntify yourself upon opening the account, the number of people who knows who you are is very very low, and not potentially all 20'000 employees of a large bank like UBS or Credit Suisse with access to normal client information. This is the solution Elvis would choose!;)
Though I don't necessarily disagree with the point that banking secrecy can be abused (as can all forms of anonymity), one should perhaps consider that it's the Swiss' right (and I am not Swiss myself) to have whatever laws they want in their own country. The Swiss believe strongly in the rights of the individual and have accepted that with this extended freedom, which you do not enjoy in for example the US or most of the EU, there will be a price to pay. I would dare argue there is a price to pay for the deteriorating rights of the individual that we see in most countries today as well.
In Norway for example, every citizen's taxes are available publicly to everyone else online (you can google the taxes of any Norwegian). They argue that without this practice (i.e. with secret wages and taxes) you will have fraud, inequality and a lack of transparency. This is further towards the other end of the spectrum. I presume you're American, which puts you in the middle. That doesn't mean I think I can tell you that you should post your taxes and salary online, nor hand over the details of your bank account to the first public servant who asks, though the (US in this case) government would probably catch a couple more tax avoiders that way.
To be honest I do not know, and I would suspect you are right. What I can say for sure though, is that in my own organization, this is is considered an absolute rule and I'd be willing to bet anything that it has never been broken. You risk jail and losing your job - I don't think any ticket (i.e. new account) is worth that (at least not to me, and I'm 100% sure not to my colleagues).
Numbered accounts do not exist - they are a James Bond myth. What we (I'm a Swiss banker) refer to as "numbered accounts" are accounts where the name of the account holder is not references in correspondence with he bank. The idea of accessing your account with only a number is a joke, considering that the Swiss have one of the strictest identification policies for opening and managing accounts in Europe (and thus probably the world). You not only need to ID yourself, but also prove where the money come from to the bank. (Certain countries have poor documentation standards for just about anything, and getting an account if you're from one of those is very very hard. You'd get it in Germany though, where they are more lax on their documentation (as is France), which is a little ironic...).
As possibly the only Swiss banker on Slashdot I should perhaps point out that: - "numbered accounts" are a myth from James Bond movies. They do *not* exist. What is referred to as a "numbered account" is an account where the bank offers to send all communication without referencing the name of the client, as a way of preserving anonymity if the communication is intercepted/stolen - ID requirements for opening a Swiss bank account today are *more* stringent than in EU. France is notably lax, which is a little ironic (you need to document not only who you are but *how* you got the money, and if there ever is a case where a bank fails to follow these guidelines, they can lose their banking license). Citizens of certain countries will find it nearly impossible to open an account in Switzerland as the level of documentation in their home country is not acceptable for opening a Swiss bank account. - The Swiss distinguish between tax fraud (fabricating papers, forging signatures etc.) which is a criminal offense and where the bank will hand over information on your account, and tax evasion (failing to list all assets/income) which is *not* a criminal offense in Switzerland. The latter category they have now conceded to assist with on a case by case basis.
It is easy to misunderstand Swiss banking secrecy as some kind of dodgy way of assisting rich foreigners with tax fraud/evasion. In fact there is no difference between the rights of a wealthy foreigner and someone like me who (though not a Swiss national) has a job and get a regular salary in Switzerland. We all have the same rights.
To understand where all this comes from, one has to understand the very strong federal system of Switzerland. The Swiss "cantons" are almost as independent as separate states, with a weak and small central government. It boils down to this: the rights of the individual is valued much higher than the rights of the state. This is why the Swiss police cannot (nor the "IRS" or any other government entity) get my account information in Switzerland. This tilt of rights in favor of the individual versus the state also leads to a lot of other differences from most other countries, like that assisted suicide is legal in some cantons, including my canton of Zurich, liberal drug policies etc. In certain cantons you can actually negotiate your tax with the local cantons (who all have different tax rates) directly.
...it depends. I was in China recently, visiting an old friend who lives there. He signed a document saying he was officially a foreigner and suddenly got CNN on his cable. Seems you can get away from most of it by not being Chinese, even in China.
I prodded the "Great Firewall" when I was there, and realized some sites were cut off, like the CNN. Besides Yahoo and some other sites have tailor made pages for the Chinese. I made a SSH-tunnel back home to god old Norway though (no restrictions on protocols/ports it seemed, only some IP-adresses), so I had no problems. I don't think it would be much of an obstacle for most slashdotters:)
Kinda funny really, that whenever the US does something ridiculous, like this, everybody goes into defense if they are being critizised from abroad. If you're a US govt. institution and want to pass another bill taking away the last illusions of privacy in the US, all you have to do is log on to/. and pretend to be a brit and critizise it. Every slashdotter from the US is suddenly all in favour. Why is this so hard to realize?
Oh, and Norwegian government is much less intrusive. So is Swedish, Danish and Islandic to mention the few ones I know well enough to compare. Pretty much every one I know really. But I'm not from the US, so the response to this post is pretty much given allready, isn't it?;P
AIX has KDE on 5L. The "L" is for Linux btw:)
SMIT works well, linuxconf does, in my experience, not. I don't like SMIT all that much, but it really works, so that puts it far ahead imho.
Yes, but lvm and the device handling is much more mature under AIX, linux still has a long way to go. AIX, which I worked on as a comsultant for two years, is much more geared towards large scale application and database servers, and especially lately SANs (storage area networks). Then again AIX have, and have had for many years, HA (high availability) failover sollutions that work very well, and especially in connection with SANs and other storage sollutions. Linux could benefit greatly in the high end area from taking a closer look at these features. A 99,999% stable Linux failover cluster with two nodes sharing an EMC storage sollution over a SAN would be very interesting:)
Slashdot Mirror
Well... Can you see electricity? Nope.
(A blinding, blue-white bolt of lightning strikes AC)
Thor has spoken.
Thank you sir - made my day!
I have an Oculus Rift and had a DK2, and to be honest I was skeptical of gaming in VR at the current iteration of the technology as it gets tiring in the long run and a lot of the games are more tech demos than real games.
But then I played Elite:Dangerous (space sim) and later The Unspoken (fireball-tossing wizard duels in multiplayer). These are games where that sense of presence that VR offers is used to mind-blowing effect. Especially in E:D, as VR allows a real sense of *scale*. I never thought about this before I tried E:D, but flying into a space station that is over a km long really gives you a "holy crap that this is huge"-feeling. And you really feel that you are sitting *inside* of your ship, which is oddly pleasing.
The same for The Unspoken. Using Oculus touch controllers you really feel that the hands you see in-game are your own, and the first time I saw my right hand burst into flame as I was charging up a fireball was another of those "holy crap" moments.
Once developers get a better handle on how to make VR games it's going to become a serious segment of gaming. We see early signs of this already, as E:D and Unspoken demonstrates, but there is still some way to go (and possible a couple of HW iterations) before it becomes a serious platform in terms of users and revenue. And I'm not ruling out another short-term crash/flop if the next iteration takes too long, or developers can't come up with better experiences before users' patience runs out. We're not there yet, but VR is just too much fun to go away permanently.
Perhaps it has always been like this, people who vote similarly read the same news sources and congregate with like-minded people only. The internet just makes groups bigger and makes these behaviours more obvious to the observer.
Probably Mr Goatse was right all along.
You're probably right, but at the risk of falling into the "everything was always better before" trap, I can't help but think that even if you used to read a right-of-center newspaper, you would get differing viewpoints, some not following general orthodoxy. A "perfect" algorithm that can with a very high degree of certainty give you what you most want to read could create the feeling that the world is *exactly* as you think. The only conclusion then, when meeting people who disagree, is that they must all be idiots...
What worries me more than social media becoming the primary source, is the idea that we should only read be interested in things we are already interested in.
We're in a period of strongly polarized opinions where the idea of political discourse seems to be that you and me sit alone on our respective mountaintops and yell at each other. It bloody important to read news that doesn't fit your existing opinions or interests, how else will you ever question them? Or get new ones?
I try to make a point of reading news sometimes from sources who's political alignment I clearly disagree with. It's annoying and refreshing (and allows me to smugly roll my eyes at the world occasionally). And just once every blue moon, I actually change my opinion or discover something interesting. In an ever more complex reality, we need more viewpoints, not fewer, and I'm worried that algorithmic filtering of news feels like a boon but is actually really detrimental to us all.
Developer only? What is that non-sense? The TrimSlice ships with Ubuntu ready to use. ~$200 for the feature set is a steal, IMO. Not happy without a Dell logo or something? What's the problem with the TrimSlice?
I bought one last week from here http://trimslice.com/web/
Cheap, cool (as in not hot) and fairly reasonably priced for what you get. Waiting for mine right now...
Having spent a little under a decade in IT consulting (AIX/Solaris/Linux) I also ended up wanting to change. Not so much because I was fed up with doing what I was doing (I also felt I made ok money), but because I wanted to try something new. I also wanted to have a career with a higher income potential and more options of taking on quite different roles in the future. I'm a little surprised only two comments suggest what I did: get an MBA!
There are typically two points in your life when employers are less obsessed with only giving you a job that directly fits your background: when you've just graduated from university (where, at least at my university, only about one third accept jobs directly related to their field of study) and upon completing an MBA (where you apply for "MBA positions", many of which do not require any particular background). I really believe the MBA is the hands down best way of performing a radical career change *without* sacrificing salary of career progress - quite on the contrary: on average it will boost both quite nicely. It is also a very intersting study, covering fields I'd always been curious about and it's a great opportunity to meet peolpe from a myriad of backgrounds. The network and friendships I gained from my MBA is really the most valuable thing in the long run (come to think of it, when you're past 30, most of us don't make that many new close friends, but during the MBA I did, which was great).
Trying to get into a ranked MBA, which I really recommend to get some bang for your bucks, might seem quite dauting at first, but in truth it is easier than one might think. There are tons of things you can do to boost your chances to a point where you will be very likely to succeed - most of which Google can dig up for you.
Um, I must admit this sounds extremely strange, but perhaps things were that different 20 years ago. Today, banks shouldn't even admit to someone having an account with them until they have IDed themselves. In my case I have my standard current account with UBS (UBS is one of the biggest retail banks in Switzerland, unlike abroad where there are no retail branches to my knowledge), and I can tell you from experience that until they have had a long hard look at my passport, they won't even talk to me (much less give me money from a friend's account).
As for my employer, which is a classic traditional Swiss private bank, you would have your own relationship manager who knows you and follows you from you first enter the bank and for the duration of your relationship with us. All your contact with the bank, in person or otherwise, would go through him or her. I know of a case where a friend of mine's father was a client with another private bank, and she'd been meeting the relationship manager several times with her father in the past. Nevertheless, one time she was in Switzerland she decided to visit the bank to check on the account's performance, but as she was not formally listed as a co-owner of the account, the relationship manager refused any information, despite recognizing her.
I think your friend's experience was rather unusual - as a matter of fact, if your friend came to me tomorrow, and I volunteered information on your account, I would be guilty of revealing client information which carries a prison sentence as well as a nasty fine.
The Swiss are extreme when it comes to keeping people's privacy. Even your tax payments (tax at source/quellensteuer) is anynomized before your company hands it over to the tax authorities on your behalf if you have a direct taxation/tax at source arrangement.
A quick comment on the numbered accounts though: one benefit of the numbered accounts which I failed to mention is that even internally in the bank, only a handful of people know who hides behind the number, which means that even though you are on file with the bank and still must idntify yourself upon opening the account, the number of people who knows who you are is very very low, and not potentially all 20'000 employees of a large bank like UBS or Credit Suisse with access to normal client information. This is the solution Elvis would choose! ;)
Though I don't necessarily disagree with the point that banking secrecy can be abused (as can all forms of anonymity), one should perhaps consider that it's the Swiss' right (and I am not Swiss myself) to have whatever laws they want in their own country. The Swiss believe strongly in the rights of the individual and have accepted that with this extended freedom, which you do not enjoy in for example the US or most of the EU, there will be a price to pay. I would dare argue there is a price to pay for the deteriorating rights of the individual that we see in most countries today as well.
In Norway for example, every citizen's taxes are available publicly to everyone else online (you can google the taxes of any Norwegian). They argue that without this practice (i.e. with secret wages and taxes) you will have fraud, inequality and a lack of transparency. This is further towards the other end of the spectrum. I presume you're American, which puts you in the middle. That doesn't mean I think I can tell you that you should post your taxes and salary online, nor hand over the details of your bank account to the first public servant who asks, though the (US in this case) government would probably catch a couple more tax avoiders that way.
To be honest I do not know, and I would suspect you are right. What I can say for sure though, is that in my own organization, this is is considered an absolute rule and I'd be willing to bet anything that it has never been broken. You risk jail and losing your job - I don't think any ticket (i.e. new account) is worth that (at least not to me, and I'm 100% sure not to my colleagues).
Oh, and by the way, they were disbanded in Panama too in the 1990s.
http://www.panamalaw.org/numbered_bank_account.html
My apologies, let me clarify - they do not exist in SWITZERLAND, which I believe is the topic of discussion here.
Numbered accounts do not exist - they are a James Bond myth. What we (I'm a Swiss banker) refer to as "numbered accounts" are accounts where the name of the account holder is not references in correspondence with he bank. The idea of accessing your account with only a number is a joke, considering that the Swiss have one of the strictest identification policies for opening and managing accounts in Europe (and thus probably the world). You not only need to ID yourself, but also prove where the money come from to the bank. (Certain countries have poor documentation standards for just about anything, and getting an account if you're from one of those is very very hard. You'd get it in Germany though, where they are more lax on their documentation (as is France), which is a little ironic...).
As possibly the only Swiss banker on Slashdot I should perhaps point out that:
- "numbered accounts" are a myth from James Bond movies. They do *not* exist. What is referred to as a "numbered account" is an account where the bank offers to send all communication without referencing the name of the client, as a way of preserving anonymity if the communication is intercepted/stolen
- ID requirements for opening a Swiss bank account today are *more* stringent than in EU. France is notably lax, which is a little ironic (you need to document not only who you are but *how* you got the money, and if there ever is a case where a bank fails to follow these guidelines, they can lose their banking license). Citizens of certain countries will find it nearly impossible to open an account in Switzerland as the level of documentation in their home country is not acceptable for opening a Swiss bank account.
- The Swiss distinguish between tax fraud (fabricating papers, forging signatures etc.) which is a criminal offense and where the bank will hand over information on your account, and tax evasion (failing to list all assets/income) which is *not* a criminal offense in Switzerland. The latter category they have now conceded to assist with on a case by case basis.
It is easy to misunderstand Swiss banking secrecy as some kind of dodgy way of assisting rich foreigners with tax fraud/evasion. In fact there is no difference between the rights of a wealthy foreigner and someone like me who (though not a Swiss national) has a job and get a regular salary in Switzerland. We all have the same rights.
To understand where all this comes from, one has to understand the very strong federal system of Switzerland. The Swiss "cantons" are almost as independent as separate states, with a weak and small central government. It boils down to this: the rights of the individual is valued much higher than the rights of the state. This is why the Swiss police cannot (nor the "IRS" or any other government entity) get my account information in Switzerland. This tilt of rights in favor of the individual versus the state also leads to a lot of other differences from most other countries, like that assisted suicide is legal in some cantons, including my canton of Zurich, liberal drug policies etc. In certain cantons you can actually negotiate your tax with the local cantons (who all have different tax rates) directly.
...it depends. I was in China recently, visiting an old friend who lives there. He signed a document saying he was officially a foreigner and suddenly got CNN on his cable. Seems you can get away from most of it by not being Chinese, even in China.
:)
I prodded the "Great Firewall" when I was there, and realized some sites were cut off, like the CNN. Besides Yahoo and some other sites have tailor made pages for the Chinese. I made a SSH-tunnel back home to god old Norway though (no restrictions on protocols/ports it seemed, only some IP-adresses), so I had no problems. I don't think it would be much of an obstacle for most slashdotters
Kinda funny really, that whenever the US does something ridiculous, like this, everybody goes into defense if they are being critizised from abroad. If you're a US govt. institution and want to pass another bill taking away the last illusions of privacy in the US, all you have to do is log on to /. and pretend to be a brit and critizise it. Every slashdotter from the US is suddenly all in favour.
;P
Why is this so hard to realize?
Oh, and Norwegian government is much less intrusive. So is Swedish, Danish and Islandic to mention the few ones I know well enough to compare. Pretty much every one I know really. But I'm not from the US, so the response to this post is pretty much given allready, isn't it?
AIX has KDE on 5L. The "L" is for Linux btw :)
SMIT works well, linuxconf does, in my experience, not. I don't like SMIT all that much, but it really works, so that puts it far ahead imho.
Yes, but lvm and the device handling is much more mature under AIX, linux still has a long way to go. AIX, which I worked on as a comsultant for two years, is much more geared towards large scale application and database servers, and especially lately SANs (storage area networks). Then again AIX have, and have had for many years, HA (high availability) failover sollutions that work very well, and especially in connection with SANs and other storage sollutions. Linux could benefit greatly in the high end area from taking a closer look at these features. A 99,999% stable Linux failover cluster with two nodes sharing an EMC storage sollution over a SAN would be very interesting :)