Slashdot Mirror


Real-Time Testing of China's Internet Filters

mrbnsn writes "The Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard Law School is conducting a study of Internet filtering in countries worldwide. As part of this study, they have put up a web page where you can get a real-time report on whether any URL you submit is blocked by the Great Firewall. Check whether you'd be able to read your favorite web sites in Beijing!" I've also heard that there are some "western" hotels that have non-blocked connections. Anyone from China care to tell us what it's like?

251 comments

  1. ROC by uberchicken · · Score: 1

    Oooo so close... I'm in Taiwan, could have been a really relevant (first) post...

  2. Ah-soo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I doubt the government would allow non-blocked connections. Otherwise you'd see 2 billion chinese packed into the Hilton every day :)

    1. Re:Ah-soo.... by rodac · · Score: 1

      No you would not. A pretty standard western business hotel in Shanghaij goes for ~300USD per night. Thats a single room at a basic business hotel. If you want the better rooms/hotels, well, then its gonna cost a lot more. They did sure get the hang of this capitalims idea pretty quickly.

    2. Re:Ah-soo.... by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      Anyone from China care to tell us what it's like?

      Maybe 'dare' would fit better than 'care'

    3. Re:Ah-soo.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      300 USD/night is still a little out of reach for the average Chinese worker. That's about 2400 in chinese money, which can be the monthly salary of some people.

    4. Re:Ah-soo.... by bleeeeck · · Score: 1
      A pretty standard western business hotel in Shanghaij goes for ~300USD per night.

      I don't think they're that expensive. Prices from one of my web site's Shanghai hotel page:(for October 15, 2002)

      It is still kind of expensive for a night of web surfing though ...
  3. The humanity! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its for your own good, I mean, good citizens only want to view things like Aunt May's puppy page right? Who would possibly want to view anything 'objectionable'? Criminals, thats who!

    heh.

  4. And so begins... by Nailer · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...the downfall of Chinese civilisation:

    Testing complete for http://www.stileproject.com. Result:
    Reported as accessible in China


    1. Re:And so begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Tired of random user bans,uninformed editors,and unfair moderatation? Me too.

      No, but I am tired of the consistently SHITTY spelling in the articles and comments.

    2. Re:And so begins... by Raetsel · · Score: 3, Informative

      • Starting testing...

      • Stage one testing complete.
        Stage two testing complete.

        Testing complete for http://google.com. Result:
        Reported as inaccessible in China

      Great. All the sleaze you want, but one of the premier search engines is off limits. Decline of civilization indeed -- perhaps the result will create an interesting test case for future anthropology and psych students.
      --

      "...America's great minds of today, teaching America's great minds of tomorrow. Poor bastards." -- A Beautiful Min
    3. Re:And so begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Slashdot.org is blocked, but not Everything2.com.

      I can't decide whether that's weird or not.

    4. Re:And so begins... by spongman · · Score: 2
      no shit! google has to be one of the most useful things on the internet, and the internet is arguable one of the most useful things around today. tools for tool users. evolution for those monkeys that can.

      Poor bastards.

    5. Re:And so begins... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Screw Stile, they let *NAMBLA* through!

      Eeugh.

    6. Re:And so begins... by tka · · Score: 1

      Testing complete for http://google.com. Result:
      Reported as inaccessible in China


      But there isn't much use for search engine like google if you can't access the pages you've searched for. I think the question is basicly about general access to every page on net, not about access to specific sites.

    7. Re:And so begins... by Stonehand · · Score: 1

      Maybe they're not overly fond of the Google Cache.

      --
      Only the dead have seen the end of war.
    8. Re:And so begins... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      I'm near Shanghai and for the last 8 months I have been hear, Google has always worked fine..... until I woke up this morning. I gather everyone else can still access it so I wonder if it was freshly added today to the block list?

      While on this topic..... whats the 2nd best search engine - finding life without google to be difficult :(

      - HeXa

    9. Re:And so begins... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      Slashdot ain't blocked or otherwise I would not be able to post this message ;)

      - HeXa

    10. Re:And so begins... by brain159 · · Score: 2

      Why not? What's so threatening to the chinese government about Marlon Brando look-alikes? :P

    11. Re:And so begins... by netsharc · · Score: 1

      Does google.de work? google has a lot of .country-code suffixes, although they share mostly the same IP. Try one of 216.239.35.100, 216.239.37.100, 216.239.39.100, 216.239.33.100

      Hmm I did nslookup 216.239.35.101 as well, it said that's www.google.com as well (although nslookup google.com returned *.*.*.100 not 101, so perhaps they didn't block it. Try and experiment. 102 and 103 seem to work as well.

      --
      What time is it/will be over there? Check with my iPhone app!
    12. Re:And so begins... by H3XA · · Score: 2

      The IP address work fine to access Google - thanks for the, solves my googling problem

      Perhaps it is a DNS problem resolving google.com, I will try again tomorrow and see if the name works yet.

      - HeXa

    13. Re:And so begins... by jelle · · Score: 2

      Masybe they blocked the DNS servers for google.

      Hmm. Maybe did the people running the root servers put up a website on those machines?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    14. Re:And so begins... by danimrich · · Score: 1

      Nevertheless,
      www.google.com works, as do
      images.google.com and
      groups.google.com.

      Trying to check whether the cached version of Amnesty International is reachable in China, I found that the system returned an error message stating that the Great Firewall blocks requests only by URL and thus the parameters should be removed from the request.
      Apparently, the server containing the cached page, "http://216.239.37.100/", can be reached from China.

      I am inclined to think that the Chinese Government may already have more subtle methods to block content. On the other hand, they keep shutting down internet cafes...

      --
      where's all that Karma?
    15. Re:And so begins... by donky · · Score: 1

      Great. All the sleaze you want, but one of the premier search engines is off limits.


      If you allow access to a website that caches copies of arbitrary web pages for retrieval and viewing, then it sort of defeats the purpose of blocking those arbitrary sites in the first place.
    16. Re:And so begins... by mrbnsn · · Score: 1
      Actually, Google has not always worked fine.

      For about one week in March, 2001, it was blocked (presumably due to the cache feature). After a week it was unblocked again (presumably due to popular outrage).

      It was blocked again early Saturday morning, China time. It will be interesting to see how long it lasts this time around, as it is even more popular now than it was 18 months ago.

    17. Re:And so begins... by smithmc · · Score: 1

      Feh. That's nuthin'.

      Testing complete for http://goatse.cx. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China

      --
      Downmodding is the refuge of the weak. Don't downmod, make a better argument!
    18. Re:And so begins... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      Turns out I still cannot use Google even with the IP addresses.... searches just time out :(

      - HeXa

    19. Re:And so begins... by Latent+IT · · Score: 2

      This is because searches rely on using the google.com DNS entry. So even though you browse to google by using 111.222.111.222 or whatever, the search result URL is still www.google.com/blahblahblah.

      To fix this problem, you need to edit your local hosts file to manually resolve google.com. If you let me know what OS you run, I can tell you exactly how to do it. This will only work if they're only filtering google.com the name, and not the IP address. But if you get the site by putting in the ip, that's probably what they're doing. How dumb!

      Of course, you could use a search engine to find out how as well. ;p

    20. Re:And so begins... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      nah.... even with IP address being used in the query I still get time outs - solved my problem though by using other NON-BLOCKED search engines that use Google as a back end :)

      - HeXa

  5. www.google.com? by Repran · · Score: 0

    Testing complete for http://www.google.com. Result: Reported as inaccessible in China Oh shit - I knew it... this must me new though cause yesterday I worked.

    --

    -- Contradictions only exist in thought - not in reality.

  6. slashdot is blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    slashdot is blocked in chaina apparently

    1. Re:slashdot is blocked by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      Well, that would certainly make it difficult for people in China to tell us what it's like, eh chris? :)

      --
      [McP]KAAOS

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    2. Re:slashdot is blocked by Genyin · · Score: 0, Redundant

      slashdot is blocked in chaina apparently

      No it isn't.

    3. Re:slashdot is blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not when tested from Korea. Wonder why the varied results....and why/if where you test from matters? Sounds like a hoax site in the works to me.

    4. Re:slashdot is blocked by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      I have problems using the " Test another URL:" field. Many unblocked sites show up as blocked when given that way. You will notice that the wrong URL is in the brower's URL bar during the test and the blocked site won't show up in their blocked site list after the test is finished.

      Seems it's better to just edit the URL in the browser's URL field.

    5. Re:slashdot is blocked by H3XA · · Score: 2

      I'm in China and I can view it fine.

      - HeXa

    6. Re:slashdot is blocked by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 1

      Could you post a traceroute? It might be interesting for someone who knows the topology.

      --
      Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
    7. Re:slashdot is blocked by H3XA · · Score: 1

      Tracing route to slashdot.org [64.28.67.150] over a maximum of 30 hops:

      1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
      2 44 ms 44 ms 43 ms x.x.x.x
      3 47 ms 42 ms 42 ms x.x.x.x
      4 44 ms 43 ms 42 ms 990-A1-33.nj.jsinfo.net [61.132.68.33]
      5 45 ms 62 ms 76 ms 990-A1-222.nj.jsinfo.net [61.132.68.222]
      6 73 ms 42 ms 43 ms 202.102.8.169
      7 44 ms 44 ms 45 ms 202.102.8.169
      8 48 ms 55 ms 48 ms 61.132.78.133
      9 49 ms 47 ms 47 ms 61.132.78.29
      10 48 ms 47 ms 48 ms 61.132.78.9
      11 48 ms 52 ms 48 ms 61.132.23.114
      12 100 ms 53 ms 51 ms p-3-0-r1-c-shsh-1.cn.net [202.97.39.9]
      13 51 ms 51 ms 51 ms 202.97.33.90
      14 175 ms 170 ms 169 ms 202.97.51.6
      15 633 ms 634 ms 643 ms ibr02-p5-1.paix01.exodus.net [206.79.9.121]
      16 753 ms 754 ms 771 ms bbr01-p6-0.sntc03.exodus.net [209.185.9.241]
      17 712 ms 676 ms 687 ms bbr02-g4-0.sntc03.exodus.net [216.33.153.66]
      18 846 ms 864 ms 866 ms bbr02-p0-0.okbr01.exodus.net [216.32.132.170]
      19 665 ms 650 ms 661 ms bbr02-p6-0.wlhm01.exodus.net [209.1.169.45]
      20 633 ms 620 ms 615 ms dcr03-g2-0.wlhm01.exodus.net [64.14.70.65]
      21 591 ms 640 ms 624 ms csr03-ve241.wlhm02.exodus.net [64.14.70.138]
      22 592 ms 584 ms 569 ms 64.28.66.204


      The trace never makes it to the last step (23) of 64.28.67.150 (Slashdot) due to a firewall it seems :)

      - HeXa

  7. It would also be interesting to post results... by afflatus_com · · Score: 2

    on the percentage success that peek-a-booty can get around a random sample of these Chinese-government blocked URLs. It would be interesting report to read, if anyone who has the capacity or people connections to can get some good effectiveness data.

    --

    -----
    Cast a Cold Eye
    On Life, on Death
    Horseman, pass by
    --W.B. Yeats' gravestone
  8. And how can we stop this? by Lady+Blue · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What I want to know is how we, the coder community, can help people in China get around the site filters! I know there's one research project underway with proxy servers, but it'd be great if someone could come up with a cheap and easy hack that solves this. Any ideas?

    1. Re:And how can we stop this? by nutznboltz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just keep making web caches of the banned documents and they will have a "whack-a-mole" problem.

      A mini cache with the most subversive web pages that could fit in 2MB could be automatically distributed to hundreds of web sites.

      You can walk around the so-called "Great" Firewall right now by using existing web caches. Can you imagine how bad they'd lose if there were thousands of caches of subversive pages?

    2. Re:And how can we stop this? by nutznboltz · · Score: 0

      Want cheap and easy? If you have a web site copy something about Tibet or Falun Dafa into it and post the location on USENET.

    3. Re:And how can we stop this? by Knightcon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about Triangle Boy the whole point of this project is to do just that defeat internet censorship in all its forms.

    4. Re:And how can we stop this? by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2, Funny

      Stile Project (a haven of rather vile material) and Camwhores got around it just by using standard load-balancing techniques.

      Meh, if there's any site worth blocking, it's Stile's.

    5. Re:And how can we stop this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, I've been going around this by using proxies. I'm using multyproxy, so I can use try lots of different proxy servers.
      I've been in China for more than 1 year, and this is what I found:
      CNN.com was blocked until recently
      ebay.com was also blocked until recently
      geocities and yahoogroups were still blocked
      google was not blocked, until couple days ago
      slashdot was not blocked, and never had any problems accessing it.

      Right now, I'm resorting to using two browsers. i use IE for the regular ones, and K-meleon connected via multiproxy for the blocked sites.

      Sure, it sucks, but as long as I can get around it, it's not bad (I looked for ways to get around this for more than 2 months!!)
      On the other hand though, a 512 kbps ADSL connection in Fujian (Southern China) costs around US$ 6 per month - including ADSL modem rental!!!
      It goes up to 8 usd/month for 1 mbps, 10 usd for 1.5 mbps, and so on.
      but in Shanghai, it's a 'whopping' 15 bucks/month for a 512 kbps :D

      They're trying to close down the internet cafes, but those who remain, charges a mere US$0.20 per hour for a 2 mbps conenction. Sure they get low salaries, but they can surf all day long with those minimum wage :D

  9. Actually... by olesk · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...it depends. I was in China recently, visiting an old friend who lives there. He signed a document saying he was officially a foreigner and suddenly got CNN on his cable. Seems you can get away from most of it by not being Chinese, even in China.

    I prodded the "Great Firewall" when I was there, and realized some sites were cut off, like the CNN. Besides Yahoo and some other sites have tailor made pages for the Chinese. I made a SSH-tunnel back home to god old Norway though (no restrictions on protocols/ports it seemed, only some IP-adresses), so I had no problems. I don't think it would be much of an obstacle for most slashdotters :)

    1. Re:Actually... by doop · · Score: 3, Informative

      I visited China very recently (to attend a conference which was being held there), and stayed in a pretty Westernized
      hotel with internet access.

      slashdot was accessible, as was google, which IIRC was even nice enough to talk to me in the appropriate language. Some bits of yahoo.com were accessible, but not the webmail or news. CNN and BBC News were both blocked, as were quite a few other news sites, and unsurprising things like Amnesty international.

      I say blocked, but what I mean is that when I tried to access these sites, the connections would always just time out while others were fine. I can't remember what happened when I tried to ping them.

      I had no trouble downloading an SSH client and using it to connect back home.

    2. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, if only I had mod points...

    3. Re:Actually... by AnyoneEB · · Score: 1

      Odd, my dad was in China for bussiness and he uses Yahoo, but had no trouble accessing anything.

      --
      Centralization breaks the internet.
    4. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, I think using "nigger" was the icing on the cake. You're just some jive-ass hooly-hoop-eyed turkey.

    5. Re:Actually... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I was in shanghai for a month, living with my cousins, who are, by the way, chinese nationals. from their home, I had no trouble accessing yahoo or cnn.

  10. list of blocked by nexex · · Score: 2

    no one IN china will be able to tell us, slashdot is on the list of known blocked sites.

    http://code.law.harvard.edu/filtering/list.html

    --
    Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    1. Re:list of blocked by killenheladagen · · Score: 1
      Either the list of blocked sites is flawed or the test is. Or maybe they switched the filter off.

      When I ran the test for slashdot.org I got the result:

      Testing complete for http://slashdot.org. Result: Reported as accessible in China

    2. Re:list of blocked by cioxx · · Score: 1
      no one IN china will be able to tell us, slashdot is on the list of known blocked sites.
      http://code.law.harvard.edu/filtering/list .html


      Uhh, no. That's just a list of sites. Eventhough it says something in effect of "these are blocked", it's probably a typo. I don't believe China would have the balls to block Sourceforge and OSDN.

      How do I know that's a stupid list? Look at this entry below:

      http://www.FIRSTPOST.com - 8/31/2002 7:13:36


      Maybe Chinese hate people who post "First Post" and are trying to reduce spam? Who knows.
    3. Re:list of blocked by p3d0 · · Score: 2
      I don't believe China would have the balls to block Sourceforge and OSDN.
      Huh? What does that mean? Why would this take "balls"?

      Anyway...

      --
      Patrick Doyle
      I mod down every jackass who puts his moderation policy in his sig. Oh, wait a sec....
    4. Re:list of blocked by billbaggins · · Score: 3, Funny
      I don't believe China would have the balls to block Sourceforge and OSDN.
      Huh? What does that mean? Why would this take "balls"?
      Y'see, whenever someone in China opens up a pipe to a blocked site, they have to run over really fast and stuff a ball in one end of the pipe so that the information can't get through. They can retrieve the ball after a timeout convinces the browser that the site doesn't exist, but if a site is really popular and a lot of people request it in a short time, they can actually run out of balls to stuff in pipes, the firewall breaks down, and they all burn to death. So they have to be very careful which sites they block.
      --
      "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
      --Winston Churchill
    5. Re:list of blocked by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 1

      Huh? What does that mean? Why would this take "balls"?

      Because this user believes in CowboyNeal's supah powah!!!

    6. Re:list of blocked by idiosync · · Score: 1

      On the contrary. I live in China (Beijing) and I visit slashdot almost daily. I don't know where that information came from.
      Some of the most notable blocked sites in my experience have been CNN, BBC at times (they ran a story that upset the government and suddenly vanished from the airwaves not too long ago), Geocities, Angelfire and most of the other large hosting services, counterpane, and the majority of US DoD sites. Stuff like cryptome works, as does the google cache for pages that are blocked normally. Most of the larger proxy services are blocked, but there is one in Belarus that people still use.
      Like the guy above said, there doesn't seem to be any filtering of ports and ssh is still possible, but it can be unbearably slow over the 28,000 connections that are typical.

      Hope this clears things up,
      Chris

    7. Re:list of blocked by mrbnsn · · Score: 1

      The test is flawed. I live in China, and I've been checking the sites that show up in the blocked list. The test has a high false-positive rate, and sites that fail one test one time are not removed from the list even if a subsequent test shows them as accessible.

  11. The Real Point by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The idea that the great firewall of China will protect the communist party is farcical. As with any wall it can do nothing against the threat that comes from inside the country.

    Of course in the mind of lunatic GOP nationalists nobody in the world outside of the US ever had an idea about freedom or human rights. But the Berlin wall failled and so will the great firewall.

    The criticism that will bring down the communist party is local. That is why they are so afraid of an AIDS activist who described how careless officials spread AIDS to whole villiages collecting blood plasma.

    Outside comment can play a useful role but politicians who agrandize themselves by claiming to have brought down communism in other countries are largely hot air bags.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    1. Re:The Real Point by nexex · · Score: 2

      Hmm, wasn't it Pres Reagan who said, "...tear down this wall!" Besides, this has nothing to do with the GOP...

      --
      Winter 2010: With Glowing Hearts
    2. Re:The Real Point by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hmm, wasn't it Pres Reagan who said, "...tear down this wall!" Besides, this has nothing to do with the GOP...

      A speach that went down well in the US but you miss out the start of the phrase, "Mr Gorbachev". Gorbachev did far more to end communism in the USSR than Reagan could.

      The Soviet Union collapsed because the Communist party had visibly lost control and Gorbachev was clearly not prepared to reassert it by force. The loss of control began in Poland and spread through Eastern Europe. It was the students from East Germany that tore down the wall, not Gorbachev or Reagan.

      If huffing and puffing from US politicians would blow down communist regimes then Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea would have fallen first. Instead they are still standing and it is pretty obvious that the regime is using the external hostility as an excuse.

      Cancel the sanctions against Cuba and the regime would be lucky to last more than five years. The right is keen to spend money on broadcast propaganda to attack Cuba but completely ignores the propaganda effect of tourists carrying fat wallets. Of course the Cuba sanctions policy is not about bringing down Fidel and has everything to do with getting votea in Florida so the effectiveness is not exactly the issue.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:The Real Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Good lord, you're angry. Try some decaf, then stop regurgitating stuff about "the right" that your friends and self-comforting media sources spew into your head.

    4. Re:The Real Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The criticism that will bring down the communist party is local. That is why they are so afraid of an AIDS activist who described how careless officials spread AIDS to whole villiages collecting blood plasma.

      Oh ya right, like capitalists never made a bunch of people sick and then tried to cover it up. Shea right. That could happen anywhere and has nothing to dow tih communism.

    5. Re:The Real Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh. What a loser. Instead of trying to aid those at the bottom to succeed, in typical Americal liberal fashion you instead seek to destroy those who make it in this country. Congradulations, you're a hypocrite.

      We have defeated Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea. Name me one of these countries that actually practices communism, and not despotism. I think we've pretty much destroyed any hope for the success of communism and socialism by example, and I know that just burns you up inside. But you need to face facts, they simply don't work. Sorry, move on.

      Cancel the embargo against Cuba and we'll just have a China 90 miles away. China, the great communist empire that openly advocates capitalism because they realize it's the only successful economic system. Better to just wait for Castro to finally die off, than to start another 50 years of pseudo-communist regimes in Cuba supported by the money of tourists.

      And if "the right" are the only ones who support the embargo, then why is it still here? The left has had plenty of time to defeat it, yet they never seem to even bring it up. Hmm. Interesting. Also, who started this little embargo? Could it be a Democrat, President Kennedy? Never!

      Also, the forced kidnapping of that little Cuban boy by Reno's gang of thugs would have more than balanced out any embargo lifting effects on Gore's pitiful presidental run. How embarassing to have lost that one, but the American people are waking up to the lies from you on the left. Scary, isn't it? Why do you think confidence in the media is at an historic low, and keeps dropping? Go ahead, do another editorial labeled as "news" and lose a few more views to Fox News.

      What is it with you left losers and Reagan? You really can't stand the man, can you? Yes, he did bring down communism in Europe and the Soviet Union. By vocally identifying the foe (re: "evil empire", re: "axis of evil") and then taking them head on, we outspent and out-maneuvered them.

      I personally think you're just angry because another socialist/communist empire failed. Guess what, they all will. It doesn't work, plese stop trying, we don't want your fucking liberal utopia here!

    6. Re:The Real Point by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      We have defeated Cuba, Vietnam, North Korea.

      Not unless you are a communist sympathizer.

      The only thing keeping those regimes alive is the ability of the leaders to blame the US for the results of their own incompetence.

      Same thing just happened with Iran. After 9/11 the democratic reformers had an ideal opportunity to take on the unelected mullahs who were then on the defensive. His Inadequacy gives his idiotic 'Axis of Evil' speech and that is all over, the mullahs are back in control and everyone has to denounce the great satan again.

      Attacks from US politicians to boost their own ratings do nothing for reform.

      Chineese comunism is going to be dumped in the garbage can of history sooner or later. They have already dumped the economic theory and the political part will follow soon enough. Ironically the main thing that holds the party in place is fear of a return to the instability and famines of Mao's great leap forward.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    7. Re:The Real Point by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excuse me? You make my point exactly, thank you very much, that we have already defeated these countries since any attempt at communism has been thwarted.

      Sigh. Are you totally inable to see the world other than than through James Carville's eyes?

  12. Sure it works? by hyeh · · Score: 1

    Are you sure this thing works?

    Both http://www.taipeitimes.com and http://www.chinatimes.com.tw are reported as being accessible in China.

    Also, I believe it is 4 star and above hotels in China that do not have restrictions on Sattelite TV and Internet access.

    1. Re:Sure it works? by e-gold · · Score: 1

      I believe it does not.

      e-gold shows as blocked from the Harvard computers, but either a LOT of Chinese use proxies to get around the blocking, or the filter-tester just doesn't work as they say/think. Chances are good that the Chinese government is big enough to pay for custom censorware, so maybe that explains it.
      JMR

      Speaking ONLY for myself!!!

      --
      Try e-gold - (contact me). I'm NOT e-
  13. Secret fibres HK-macow by throwaway18 · · Score: 1

    Hong Kong is now part of China. I saw a rumour, can't remeber where, that there are secret undersea fibre optic cables running from Hong Kong to Macow to supply corporations with an uncensored internet connection.

    1. Re:Secret fibres HK-macow by odaiwai · · Score: 2

      HK and Macau were both *NOT* part of China for a long time. They're now both Special Administrative Regions and very independent.

      I'm in HK and, trust me, there are no restrictions on the internet here.

      As for cables to Macau, it would make some sense to run cables across the Pearl Delta from HK (it's not that far) just to avoid going through the Mainland, and because it's a shorter line. It would have been done a long time ago, though, well before Macau was handed back to China.

      Macau was only returned to China in 1999, *AFTER* HK (1997), so I can't see any advantage - if there was a crackdown, HK would have been first.

      Some of the sites on the 'inaccessible' list were for pro-Taiwan HK newspapers, so sites in one part of China are blocked from the main part.

      ah-wai

    2. Re:Secret fibres HK-macow by H3XA · · Score: 1

      heh..... if a mainland person wants pr0n, they go to HK do do some VCD/DVD/magazine shopping at the corner store - just like the mainland but with pr0n instead of the usual warez:)

      - HeXa

  14. Gotta have them whores.. by meff · · Score: 1

    Testing complete for http://www.camwhores.com. Result:
    Reported as accessible in China

    Whoohoo!

    Apparently stileproject works too.. lol.

  15. Internet in China Rocks by Quarkness · · Score: 0

    I just got back from China. I've stayed three weeks in a hotel in shanghai with unlimited internet access in the room. The only website that was blocked (not in the dns) was www.cnn.com. europe.cnn.com and asia.cnn.com worked just fine. The speed was incredible.
    The next three weeks I travelled around the country (Chongqing, Chengdu, Xi'an, Beijing and more). At most of the internet bars I could watch the dutch news full screen at very high quaulity, something I'm not able to do with my cable modem at home. The highest download speed I got was 450 Kbytes/sec. (from messenger.microsoft.com of all places)
    At some places they do have filters, I was reading a newspaper online that had an article about porn, that article was blocked.
    The places I mentioned were public internet bars cramped with Chinese people. Most of them were playing online games though...

    So, if you can live without online porn, internet in china is just fine.

  16. No sourceforge in China? by micahjd · · Score: 2
    Anyone else notice that http://sourceforge.net is blocked? I've had Chinese developers asking me to mirror documentation on my sourceforge-hosted site because it was blocked.

    --
    -- 2 + 2 = 5, for very large values of 2
    1. Re:No sourceforge in China? by athmanb · · Score: 2

      Probably because of the subversive downloads hosted by sourceforge like some gnutella and freenet clients.

    2. Re:No sourceforge in China? by r6144 · · Score: 1
      I'm in Shanghai. All project homepages (like speex.sourceforge.net) are blocked. www.sourceforge.net became blocked very recently. Thankfully prdownloads.sf.net and lists.sf.net are still accessible, so I can still download things and read mailing lists (if I can obtain the list names), but not much more.

      Google is accessible, so project homepages etc. can still be read via the google cache, but often it is a PITA.

      Of course I'm very unhappy about this, and cannot understand why. Maybe it is because of the `forge' in it, maybe they want to prevent IP leakage, or it may just be a mistake that no one cared to report. I want to send some interesting patches to PrBoom, but don't even know where to send them.

    3. Re:No sourceforge in China? by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

      Figures... They block open-source but not warez!

      RIAA/MPAA should look to China as a role model of the American teenager if they keep pissing the "consumer" (I'm not a teen but I'm mad as hell) off.

      Up here in Canada, we have succeeded in a 15% decrease in music... Congradulations my fellow Canadians... Are CDs are 50% cheaper and we still pirate more...

      Per capita, more broadband, at a cheaper price, but it appears that when Canadians say boycott, more of us carry it out!

    4. Re:No sourceforge in China? by spongman · · Score: 2

      ironic, isn't it, that a country with such a poor IP record as Chin should be blocking suck things. ho-hum.

    5. Re:No sourceforge in China? by H3XA · · Score: 1

      sourceforge is wierd.... sometimes it is blocked and sometimes its not.... or particular subsites are/are not.

      ... not like its hard to proxy around the restrictions though ;)

      - HeXa

    6. Re:No sourceforge in China? by skuenzli · · Score: 2

      Well, it looks like a guy named Colin Phipps is maintaining this source. You can reach him at:
      cph [at] cph [dot] demon [dot] co [dot] uk.

      If you have a more specific contact request, then let me know and I will try to find it.

      Regards,
      Stephen

  17. Look at what is powering their lookups: by echophase · · Score: 1

    218.2.131.246 - - [30/Aug/2002:18:18:43 -0500] "GET / HTTP/1.0" 200 1110 "-" "MSIE 5.0b1 ( Windows 98)" Rock on.

    1. Re:Look at what is powering their lookups: by damiam · · Score: 1
      IE doesn't even say that - it says "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0, Windows 98)"

      It's likely that they just have some perl script that identifies itself as IE.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    2. Re:Look at what is powering their lookups: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Confirmed from recent weblogs:
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 95)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 98)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows 98; Hotbar 4.0)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT 5.0)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.01; Windows NT; v1.0 C1; v2.0 C3;
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; AOL 7.0; Windows 98; DigExt; btclick.com
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows 98; DigExt; CDv5_0699)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.0; Windows NT; DigExt)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.1b1; Mac_PowerPC)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.50; Windows NT; SiteKiosk 4.8; SiteCoach 1.0)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; MSN 2.5; Windows 98)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; QXW0335r)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Supplied by blueyonder)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; VNIE4 3.1.814; sureseeker.com)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows 98; Win 9x 4.90)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0; PRU_IE55SP1; PRU_IE55)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 4.0; e-merge April 2000)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0)"
      "Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 5.5; Windows NT 5.0; Config D)"

    3. Re:Look at what is powering their lookups: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That doesn't tell you anything. I've had my copy of AtGuard configured to send the string "Mozilla/6.76 (Linux; U; PPC)" for years. No idea if Mozilla is up to 6.76 yet or not.

    4. Re:Look at what is powering their lookups: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, what the hell is the matter with you?

      At least CENSOR the ip address the request came from, eh? You've just given firewall administrators all over .cn yet another IP range to add to the filter.

  18. Nice by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://www.snuffx.com. Result:
    Reported as accessible in China

  19. wrong by tanveer1979 · · Score: 2

    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://slashdot.org. Result:
    Reported as accessible in China

    Slashdot is accessible apparently
    --
    My Aurora : http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o91ZsGwJYyg
    FB : https://www.facebook.com/TanveersPhotography
    1. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Certainly wrong, i've just returned from China and Slashdot could be reached from there. News.bcc.co.uk was the only site that i couldn't reach.

    2. Re:wrong by billbaggins · · Score: 5, Informative
      From the front page...

      http://slashdot.org - Reported as inaccessible in China
      http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China

      Throw your result in (slashdot.org accessible), and what we get is either a filter on the fritz, or else this tester still has some bugs to be worked out of it. According to the FAQ, China's filter is based on IP address. Does slashdot's homepage have multiple IPs? (sorry, too lazy to check).

      For whatever it's worth, it seems that Saudi Arabia is not known to block slashdot.

      --
      "The best argument against democracy is a five minute chat with the average voter."
      --Winston Churchill
    3. Re:wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For whatever it's worth, it seems that Saudi Arabia is not known to block slashdot.

      Interestingly enough, according to that list, they have blocked that very popular page
      named "404 Not Found". :-)

  20. no google? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They block google? I assume because of the cached pages. ug, the internet is just a incoherant mass without google.

    Really though, this shouldn't be considered a big deal. It's china's business on how they want to run their country not the rest of the world. Maybe I start critizing china when the u.s. is perfect, till then MYOB!

  21. All SourceForge sites blocked by Eloquence · · Score: 5, Informative
    This is the list of sites that have been found to be inaccsesible. A lot of them are the expectable human rights (Amnesty etc.), Tibet and Falun Gong stuff, as well as some news media (Yahoo Asia News, CBS News, BBC news, and many US-based China news sites).

    Geocities appears to be completely blocked.

    The Chinese government doesn't like Playboy or sex.com - hmm, do we see a correlation between repressive government and antisexual morals there? Nah, couldn't be.

    I have no idea why they censor {Insert Something Funny}, an obscure weblog, an anti-tobacco group, the Canadian Parks and Wilderness Society, Columbia Earthscape, or Columbia University.

    Google is on their shitlist. No surprise given its cache and large index. The Wayback Machine isn't - I'd expect that to change in the long term. Anonymizer is accessible as well.

    Peek-A-Booty and Freenet are not accessible, of course. It appears that all SourceForge sites are blocked (unless the testing engine is slashdotted and not working properly, but other sites are reported as accessible). I presume this might be because Freenet is hosted at SourceForge.

    1. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by Carlos+Laviola · · Score: 1
      Testing complete for http://www.amnesty.org. Result:
      Reported as accessible in China
    2. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by Eloquence · · Score: 1

      Not for me - I get the inaccessibility message. Their testing method is probably unreliable.

    3. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      All the site you claim as being blocked show up as accessble when I test them from Seoul.

      Sounds like hype to me that anything is being blocked at all.

    4. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by spongman · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would have thought that a country that has a 1-child-per-family law would want to encourage the male population to jack off as often as possible.

    5. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by HungWeiLo · · Score: 1

      an anti-tobacco group [gasp4air.org]...

      This one's easy - they're pocketing cash from the tobacco companies here in the States. Why can Philip Morris keep paying out billions to states and families here? Because they can be assured of a market of 8-year-olds enjoying their most luscious products in Third World countries. At last count, some report said that a large percentage (I don't remember how much) of children 6 and above in China are regular smokers. No surprise given all the unrestricted advertising in the country by Big Tobacco.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    6. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by garcia · · Score: 2

      really? I just tried Playboy and Maxim and they worked just fine. If the government doesn't like them why don't they block them?

    7. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've tested some sites, and it seems that as a rule of thumb less known sites have a better chance of being reported as blocked (I've tested a couple of topics, but I think the best way to test this is use well-known vs. obscure free/open-source software projects). It means that the blocking scheme is pro-active, I guess (allow only approved sites, rather than disallow only banned ones).

    8. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by j_w_d · · Score: 2

      The last I heard, Seoul was still in Korea, so perhaps that has something to do with their being accessible there.

      --
      ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
    9. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by More+Trouble · · Score: 1
      Several Universities are block because they host Falun Gong information. Mine is, umich.edu.

      :w

    10. Re:All SourceForge sites blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i was in western china last year, and noticed that all the news internation sites, sky news etc were not blocked.
      surely some co-incidence, what with murdoch owning star news which boardcasts all over south and eat asia.
      I suppose he is not considered a subersive influence (in china)

  22. FreeNet blocked? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It appears that freenet has been blocked (IPv6 tunnelling). For obvious reasons.

    I believe that you can still get Freenet from Debian, and that isn't blocked.

    I wonder what would happen if people set up IPv6 sites and ask people in China to do 6to4 tunnelling?

  23. The Great Firewall is not that bad. by cioxx · · Score: 1

    Testing complete for http://znet.org. Result:
    Reported as accessible in China



    Seriously, if Znet/NPR are not blocked in China, I don't see what the big deal is. Either Harvard folks coded that url checker with QBASIC or China is a Great place to live in.
    1. Re:The Great Firewall is not that bad. by tempmpi · · Score: 1

      Maybe because there isn't anything interessting to see at znet.org ?

      --
      Jan
    2. Re:The Great Firewall is not that bad. by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Hey man, don't diss QBASIC!

      My friend and I once invented a programming language and wrote a compiler for it in QBASIC. It's nowhere near complete enough to be useful, but it does actually build .com files that execute in DOS.

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
  24. Pr0n not blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's quite interesting. I'm a chinese but I can watch pr0n.

    1. Re:Pr0n not blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kleenex please...

  25. Does this test actually work? by samoht · · Score: 1

    Having a look at the recent requests on the main page I see:

    http://slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China

    But on the Inaccessible Sites page I see:

    # http://slashdot.org - 8/29/2002 11:39:06 AM

    Something wrong with the test?

    1. Re:Does this test actually work? by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      I have problems using the "test another URL" field. Seems it doesn't always update the site being checked and causes "random" blocked/unblocked results. The "block" errors are never logged to the list of blocked sites.

      It is much easier and more reliable to just edit the URL in the brower's URL field at the top.

  26. Sigh... by Jesus+IS+the+Devil · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Testing complete for http://www.goatse.cx. Result:
    Site not reachable from US testing location. Check URL and web server.


    I guess somebody up in the Chinese government got tricked into going over to goatse.cx and got a real scare...

    --

    eTrade SUCKS
    1. Re:Sigh... by cioxx · · Score: 1
      Testing complete for http://www.goatse.cx

      wow. That was original.

      You shall now be crowned as the KOMEDY KING of Slashdot.
    2. Re:Sigh... by Krapangor · · Score: 1
      Site not reachable from US testing location.

      I think that means that the Havard Law School has a filter which blocks goatse.
      Unfortunately there is no censoring in the US.

      --
      Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    3. Re:Sigh... by puckhead · · Score: 1

      Give him a break. It wasn't original or funny but it was neccessary.

      --
      Watching Cowboy Bebop in my jammies, eating a bowl of Shreddies.
    4. Re:Sigh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For a guy who's posting history is as dry as sand, you sure are one picky mofo.

    5. Re:Sigh... by cioxx · · Score: 1

      For a guy who's posting history is as dry as sand, you sure are one picky mofo.

      Actually that's not the case. I've been with /. since the early days and witnessed the best and worst throughout...

      I try not to linger on one account for long.

      Hope that explains it.

  27. Extensive testing by worried geeks... by MavEtJu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Extensive testing by worried geeks has shown that slashdot.org is still accessible from the Chinese part of the Internet. Further tests are scheduled for the next couple of days to make sure it stays.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  28. The horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now, which country was it that was behind a Great Firewall?

    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://goatse.cx. Result:
    Site not reachable from US testing location.

    1. Re:The horror! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you're complaining because...?

  29. Real-Time Testing of MPAA / RIAA filters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now when will we have a real-time method of testing MPAA / RIAA's filters?
    Anyone interested to study this?
    I've also heard that there are still some "eastern" ISPs which do not block P2P applications.

  30. Proof of a repressive society! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Apparently http://midgetsex.com is a threat to the communist party.

  31. http://www.microsoft.com - Reported as accessible by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They got *that* one right!

  32. No blocking in better hotels by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was in Beijing two months ago. Stayed in the Crown Royal. There was a computer in the room, with full time internet and none of the western sites I checked were blocked. CNN International was on TV as usual.

    Remember, it's the internet cafes' that are mostly affected (and then not that often), not Hotels were foreignors stay, or massive groups of individual users.

    1. Re:No blocking in better hotels by H3XA · · Score: 1

      quick summary of major blocked sites....

      CNN
      BBC
      Geocities

      - HeXa

  33. What's the point? by awptic · · Score: 2

    Having an entire coutry filter content is ridiculous.. don't they realise how futile this is against anyone with even the most basic understanding of computers and network? It doesn't take a genious to setup an ssh tunnel to a proxy outside of china, or to do any other number of things that could circumvent the filters. Oh well... that's alot of money down the drain for nothing.

    1. Re:What's the point? by spongman · · Score: 2

      the problem is that if you're intelligent enough to set up such a tunnel, are you willing to rish being shot in the back of the head for doing so?

  34. I'm in China, it's not that bad... by pfleisch · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just arrived in Dalian, China three weeks ago and I'm going to be here for a year working at the Chinese Academy of Sciences.

    One of my main fears about coming here was the internet access. I was afraid that they would block any western site that could talk about democracy or badly about China in any way. Could it be possible that I might not be able to, gasp, read slashdot for an entire year? After I got here I found at that isn't the case at all. I can get to Slashdot, CNN, Yahoo, pretty much every site that I use on a regular basis. The only one that really pisses me off is sourceforge. Out of all the sites to block, why the hell did they pick that one? Maybe because they figure that if anyone does find a way to write a piece of software that could get around their firewall, that would probably be one of the first places it would be posted. I can't seem to come up with a better answer. Any ideas?

    Anyway, Google is not blocked, and neither is the cache, so if I ever do find a site that I can't get to, I just use Google's cache to get a general idea of what is there.

    Also, as far as the blocking of Playboy and other sex sites goes, any country where you can walk into a bar and have two prostitutes sitting on your lap within 5 minutes (no joke) has far more serious moral issues to deal with than a few internet sex sites. Enough said.

    1. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot bashes america so much, of course they will allow you to read it.

      Slashdot isn't so much pro-democracy as it anti-america.

      It's the america-sucks-chic man, get with the latest fashion!

    2. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by fluppy88 · · Score: 1

      When I was in China I was glad to see that slashdot.org (about a year ago)wasn't blocked. Neither was the economist.com (which I found strange). But washington post, ny times, la times (and other major papers were blocked. ny times is not blocked now, right? Most of my news I could get from news.yahoo.com so I didn't really have any trouble with news sites, but virtually all free webhosting was blocked, and many universities were blocked as well. i used the Real-Time Testing link to test my old homepage at duke.edu and it said the link worked, but when I was in China the link definitely did not work.

      also, it's mostly only the foreigners who have two prostitues sitting on their lap withing 5 minutes. It's because foreigners go to those places and pay for prostitutes, supply meets demand, and an ugly cycle begins. (I never met one chinese person who frequented prostitues. They either couldn't afford it or didn't need one)

    3. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >(I never met one chinese person who frequented >prostitues. They either couldn't afford it or >didn't need one)

      bollocks! One chinese policeman and I thumbed through my phrasebook on a train journey together - he invited me to stay at his hometown, and then told me he would get me a prostitute! - he seemed surprised when I said I didn't want one ...

      China's one-child policy, combined with a culture that perceives male children as more useful (not so different from most cultures really) means that there are more men than women. In that situation you get lots of prostitutes. Nothing wrong with that IMHO but the Chinese definitely use them

      The anonymous coward formely known as jonathan emett

      (ie too lazy to log in)

    4. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by gabacho · · Score: 1

      ...go to those places? You mean hotels? Or are you implying one would never go to a bar for a few drinks? And those Chinese that can afford it and want it, do it. No moral supremacy there.

      --
      (This sig has been removed at the request of the patent holder for Sigs.)
    5. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      "Also, as far as the blocking of Playboy and other sex sites goes, any country where you can walk into a bar and have two prostitutes sitting on your lap within 5 minutes (no joke) has far more serious moral issues to deal with than a few internet sex sites. Enough said."

      thats because lao wai's are so much "better equipped"..... or thats what I tell my Chinese wife :D

      - HeXa

    6. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "thats because lao wai's are so much "better equipped"..... or thats what I tell my Chinese wife :D"

      Unfortunately, this racist attitude doesn't make up for lao wai's being te bie ben!

    7. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by SystemAddict · · Score: 0

      I was a bit surprised to find that www.guardian.co.uk (liberal British newspaper) was allowed by the Gt Firewall but the test failed for www.telegraph.co.uk (right-wing British newspaper which one would expect George Bush the Younger to think just fine) was not accessible from the USA!

    8. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by H3XA · · Score: 1

      I'm part Chinese.... perhaps I should beat the crap out of myself for making fun of my weiner dimensions :)

      - HeXa

    9. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by FunkyChild · · Score: 1

      Also, as far as the blocking of Playboy and other sex sites goes, any country where you can walk into a bar and have two prostitutes sitting on your lap within 5 minutes (no joke) has far more serious moral issues to deal with than a few internet sex sites. Enough said.

      Perhaps by blocking sex sites, they think they can stimulate the local economy? Ooh that was a bad pun...

    10. Re:I'm in China, it's not that bad... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That depends. Does your wife post anonymously on ./?

  35. What they don't tell you... by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    All sites tested here will be reviewed by party apparatchiks for inclusion in the filters.

    This site is nothing but a ploy to collect objectionable websites!

    Ok, not really. I just wanted to use 'apparatchiks' in a sentence. Btw, autopr0n isn't filtered! Come on and visit, horny chinamen! (and horny Chinese lesbians too). Coincidentally, there happen to be lots of Asian chicks featured...

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  36. Something's not right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Every site that you guys are saying is blocked is showing as not blocked for me. I'm in Seoul, South Korea and I don't see why it should matter where I test from.

    I think the so-called test site is randomly picking sites to tag as blocked.

    1. Re:Something's not right.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since when did South Korea belong to China?

  37. nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Np, it apparently does not. All the sites I test that others claim are blocked are fine.

    The Harvard test is bogus.

    1. Re:nope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Harvard is an institution operated by and for the elite ruling class of america, of course they will spread lies and fud about the only non-western state with potential for wold power status. Harvard has a record of aiding the united states government in intelligence and propoganda work. Just becuase a school is considered "good" (i guess by good most people mean to expensive for working class riff-raff and racist admissions so no pesky africans get into the elite echelon) doesn't mean it won't protect it's place in the ruling elite by any means. Do you know how much defense budget money gets funneled into these elite schools? They will say whatever the masters tell them to say.

    2. Re:nope by H3XA · · Score: 1

      perhaps it would be more useful if they ACTUALLY came to China to do this testing instead of relying on the "average netizen" that appears "informed" if they can press a button.

      - HeXa

    3. Re:nope by parasite · · Score: 0

      Harvard ?? And American in the same sentence ?? Are you out of your fucking mind ?
      Harvard is one of the top anti-American, pro-terrorist institutions functioning
      and alive in the United States today. When have you seen a single word of support
      for anything American come out of that leftist post-Modernist shithole ?? Just tell
      me a single instance. They believe in "tolerance" of pure evil -- ie muslim
      terrorists -- and meanwhile don't want their perfect multi-culturalism messed up
      so they prohibit the only pro-American institution, the miliary, from advertising
      on campus. You are one moronic little shit

  38. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  39. china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    China is doing it all wrong.

    They should try to adopt more western policies.

    For instance, arrest the person running anti-american website and seize the servers as "evidence". Or if someone says negative things about american financial interests i.e. big business, just sue them into oblivion. Then once the pesky dissenters are silenced you let huge media cartels roll in and control everything that the public sees.

    This way you still give the illusion of free speech, but no one can really say anything that threatens the ruling class.

    China is doing it all wrong.

    1. Re:china by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That post needs modded up--he hit it right on the head.

  40. Won't be long by r6144 · · Score: 1
    Google is quite well known in China --- my mother and her friends use it as the sole search engine (except on some campus machines where nothing outside China is accessible). If it gets blocked, people will notice it quickly.

    But... it is blocked now (or slashdotted, which is less probable)... maybe slashdot shouldn't have posted this story in the first place...

    1. Re:Won't be long by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

      It is possible to pull up banned web pages via the google cache. I used to do this at work all the time to get around the firewall back when we had one. That is probably why the blocked it.

    2. Re:Won't be long by mrbnsn · · Score: 1
      Google was added to the block list early Saturday morning, China time. They blocked Google once before, in March, 2001, but gave it up after a week due to popular discontent.

      Presumably, this time around it is part of a general heightening of security during the run-up to the pivotal Party Congress in November, when all of the third generation leaders are set to retire.

  41. It is broken... by Chexsum · · Score: 0

    From the formbox;

    http://www.google.com - Reported as inaccessible in China
    http://www.communism.org - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.google.com - Reported as accessible in China

    It is obviously broken!

    --
    Pixels keep you awake!
  42. not accurate by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is just another anti-china propoganda tool.

    It reports sites as being blocked which aren't really blocked. This is garbage. China is really the only non-western power that can threaten america and it's allies. Of course this all part of a propoganda war, which slashdot is happy to aid. Just like being against genetically engineered foods is looks like a "Grass roots" movement it's really just a way for the EU rulers to control imports from america. There is constantly this anti-china crap in western media outlets geared towards the tech savvy. Don't buy the hype. The west isn't so free as you think it is, and china isn't so bad as you think it is.

  43. Disable popups on chinese sites, or PORN! by r6144 · · Score: 1
    Online porn is officially illegal in China, but many of the ads on Chinese sites (especially local news sites whose funding is scarce) are adult content enough. In some sites, porn is just one click away. A few even put porn^H^H^H^Hadult content links in my Favorites or Desktop (only when using IE, of course). Fortunately only my parents use IE at home now, and they know how to remove those bookmarks manually.

    If my government want to do censorship, it should start from the inside. At least few major US or UK sites will link to goatse.cx-alike on the front page.

    1. Re:Disable popups on chinese sites, or PORN! by H3XA · · Score: 1

      Online pr0n in China is still VERY easy to access..... um..... so I have been told ;)

      - HeXa

    2. Re:Disable popups on chinese sites, or PORN! by parasite · · Score: 0

      I don't get tit...

      When I was in the Beijing airport last week, there was this dude,
      and he was standing at the magazine racks (BTW right next to the
      children's books) flipping through EVERY LAST individual page of
      a 300+ page nudie magazine. (Like he was an old Chinese Geizer dude)
      and he was obviously enjoying it very much. Hell for that price,
      I woulda bought my own copy, but I was worried of embarassment if
      they decided to search my carry-on -- DOH! I was already past the
      security checkpoint anyway.

      Anyway there was some little kids like 2 feet away... their
      precious eyes! DEAR GOD, the horrors. Of course, I didn't care
      what kids saw when I was 14 years old and my friends and I would
      go to Waldenbooks and grab all the "sex position" books we could
      find and drag them over to the kids section, and leave them
      wide open on the shelves! God that was hilarious.

      oh for back in the day...

  44. Infrastructure by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    Does anybody know anything about the actual infrastructure that is the "Great Firewall of China"?

    I've done some googlin' but can't really find out anything about it. I think I heard once that Cisco had been involved in putting it together.

    I'm just idley curious - where is it/they? What platforms are used? What are the bandwidth requirements etc. Anybody know?

  45. xenu by nzhavok · · Score: 2
    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://www.xenu.com. Result:
    Site not reachable from US testing location. Check URL and web server.

    must be those dame scientologists in beijing
    --

    He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
    1. Re:xenu by Fastolfe · · Score: 1

      That's just saying that it couldn't even get to the site from the United States, which probably means the site's down or you mistyped a URL. China wasn't tested here.

    2. Re:xenu by Happy+go+Lucky · · Score: 1
      I believe Operation Clambake is actually http://www.xenu.NET

      It does come back as being accessible in China, FWIW. Apparently, Tom Cruise hasn't reprogrammed the Great Firewall yet.

  46. Re:How accurate is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the only reason kuro5hin hasn't been blocked is because they blocked: www.kiroshin.org, and then kiro5hen.org, and all the other logical sounding spellings. It will be awhile before they reach the maximum illogical numeral/letter configuration that finally blocks the site.

  47. How to bypass www restrictions? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Your corporate has blocked some www sites? Is your surfing being monitored by some software which logs all the sites you visit? Worry no more brother.. All you need to do is -> point your browser to some site which does translations and "translate" the page which is blocked! The only thing that shows in logs is the URL of the site that does the translation!

  48. No problems by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 1

    I was in China last spring break for a series of concerts. Wheil we were in Bejing, we stayed in the Carey Centre Hotel, which is one of the nicest in Bejing. So when we got to our rooms, obviousy, the 1st thing I went for was the internet connection. Well, It was a little box that looked like a TiVo which had come CAT5 cable coming out of the back and a coax cable to the TV. so we turned it on and..... it ran a chineese version of LINUX! My room mate and I were thrilled and we stayed up all night playing with the thing.

    Anyway, back to the firewall, it seems that CNN is accessable by the harvard website on this page

    http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/tes t/ go.asp?URL=http://www.cnn.com

    my experiences are that the firewall only blocks certan IPs, not just allows certan IPs. So, you can telnet to your home box, use Lynx to brows the web remotely, and have no problems!

    1. Re:No problems by Large+Green+Mallard · · Score: 2

      Or if you were really hardcore, and slightly paranoid about the Chinese government sniffing your login details to your home machine, you'ld use SSH to connect to it.

      Or even better, use the ssh -L port forwarding command to forward a local port on your machine in china to the squid port on your machine back home and browse the web using your browser of choice ;)

    2. Re:No problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I was in China last spring break for a series of concerts"

      Frightens me a bit that the first thing you went for was still the internet connection on your holiday ;P

      As for china not being so bad... believe whatever you want mate ;) As for the western world being rotten too... agreed.

    3. Re:No problems by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      ssh -X unrestricted.host
      is the way to go.

      Forward X Window apps through the beauty of ssh. When people talk about the Internet routing around censorship as damage, this is what they mean.
      Mail me at anything at mmdc dot net if you truly need an unrestricted connection over ssh.
      I'll set you up (if you can use mozilla over X)...

      Cheers,
      Jim in Tokyo

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    4. Re:No problems by jabbadeznuts · · Score: 1

      Well,

      we got to our hotel in Bejing arround 4 AM EST. so we had nothing better to do. I was with the school Band.

  49. My site's blocked. Speculating why. by Charles+Dodgeson · · Score: 2
    My vanity site is reported as inaccessible. I'm not sure why, but here are some guesses
    • It's vhosted, and there is something interesting I share that IP address with.
    • For a while, I reported all spam involving unresponsive Chinese network operators to the Chinese embassy in the US, telling them that this was a image problem for China.
    • After never having a response to those either, I started including in my LARTs to China text like "thank you for your support of a Free and Independent Tibet", hoping that that might get someone to pay attention.
    --
    Prime numbers are exactly what Alan Greenspan says they are -S. Minsky
  50. Re:How accurate is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah. Looks like it is true. It was programmed with QBASIC. :(

  51. Not a waste of money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Most people don't have even the slightest background in computers- chinese or otherwise. 99% of web-browsing americans wouldn't have any idea what to do if they typed in a URL and a page came back saying "Website not available". If they'd never been there before, they'd probably think the site doesn't exist. The difference is that americans could go find books or other sites to learn the loopholes. China probably blocks this education. I wonder if many chinese even know that they're being blocked, and only know the internet that they are allowed to see.

  52. Odd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They blocked playboy.com but not whitehouse.gov.
    I bet they blocked whitehouse.com.

  53. Spent 2 months there this summer by Ducon+Lajoie · · Score: 1

    Here's my experience while accessing the net through internet cafés, both officials and less official ones. Yeah, cnn.com is blocked. but money.cnn.com was not. It's not a very smart filter it seems.
    Some sites will just time out. In some places a proxy generated page will tell you about a breach of user agreement, both in english and chinese.

    It does not prevent young chinese boys to access plenty of pr0n in plain view in some cafés.

    Slashdot.org was accessible when I tried it. I even posted a comment on a similar story while a was there.

  54. Two words .... by shri · · Score: 2

    Thank Cisco. :)

    1. Re:Two words .... by vegetablespork · · Score: 1

      Fucking disgrace, Cisco is. Their people should be on trial at the Hague for crimes against humanity for turning their talents in this direction.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  55. With Peekabooty by elegante · · Score: 1



    With Peekabooty the Chinese can un-block whatever the states wanna block.

  56. Re:How accurate is this? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    4, Interesting ?
    Let's see if I can make up something similar:

    http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as inaccessible in China
    http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as inaccessible in China
    http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.slashdot.org - Reported as inaccessible in China


    Very odd indeed.

  57. Anyone from China care to tell us what it's like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    SUPPLIES!!!

    (probably noone will get it, sigh)

  58. amerika have good rooking presidensu by deadb0lt · · Score: 1

    Testing complete for http://www.whitehouse.com. Result: Reported as accessible in China Chinese Male 1: Ooooh! Rikey amerikan presidensu! Chinerse Male 2: Yes yes. I rooking and get BIG penis!

    --
    I would create a sig, if only something of value could be said with just 120 chars.
    1. Re:amerika have good rooking presidensu by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You moron, that's not even Chinese. That was a Japanese imitation.

      Better to be informed before becoming a racist, don't you think?

  59. The reason The Great Firewall sucks. by nutznboltz · · Score: 1

    click me
    Me too.

    Just keep making web caches of the banned documents and they will have a "whack-a-mole" problem.

    1. Re:The reason The Great Firewall sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      click me [archive.org]
      Me too. [harvard.edu]

      Just keep making web caches of the banned documents and they will have a "whack-a-mole" problem. Phew. I actually thought that this was a goatse troll....

    2. Re:The reason The Great Firewall sucks. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a web site it's easy to make a cache of a banned document. Just use "wget --mirror" or similar to pull something about Tibet or Falun Dafa into your site and post the new location on USENET.

      It doesn't even have to be very much data, just be as subversive as possible.

  60. Tobacco is banned for people under 18 by r6144 · · Score: 1
    In shanghai, it IS illegal to sell tobacco/cigarette to people under 18. I can see such a sign at all cigarette-selling places on campus.

    As for the percentage of young regular smokers, I find it hard to believe. No one in my middle school or high school dare smoke in public.

    1. Re:Tobacco is banned for people under 18 by bash99 · · Score: 1
      In shanghai, it IS illegal to sell tobacco/cigarette to people under 18. I can see such a sign at all cigarette-selling places on campus.
      As you can image, it's never works in real life.
      As for the percentage of young regular smokers, I find it hard to believe. No one in my middle school or high school dare smoke in public.
      I've been in Shanghai JiaoTong University, about 20% shanghai classmate smokes when they in high school, but I'm sure they are more in other city.
  61. So scared that they forgot to block it? by r6144 · · Score: 1

    A week ago I got there (from china). Using links(1), of course. The text along is scary enough.

  62. Chinese control of outside access by gabacho · · Score: 1

    I lived in China for 2 1/2 years, retuning 2 years ago. In general, the Chinese gov't does little to restrict foreigners' access to outside world. They just don't want the average citizen to have access to "corruption". I have never had my baggage searched going in and out of China (many times) but the Chinese are frquently pulled over for inspection. TV is controlled. I lived in an apartment building that had only Chinese living there. TV had only Chinese programing on it. On a building for foreigners there is no problem setting up a dish and getting what you want. I had internet access in Shanghai and Beijing. I could never confirm it, but it seems there were dial-in numbers for Westerner's accounts and then there were different dial-in numbers for Chinese accounts. There were some websites I simply could not connect to. The only one I can remember for certain was anything on Geocities. But there were others. Generally speaking, Westerners are not bothered unless they want to attend, for example, a Falungong activity. :>)

    --
    (This sig has been removed at the request of the patent holder for Sigs.)
  63. darn..... why did i forget.. by sydneyfong · · Score: 2

    ... to test out the rumored blocked sites when I was in Tian Jin (a city near Beijing) a few weeks ago. Well, there I found a netcafe, and got online for a few hours. Slashdot was definately accesible there, and IIRC google was accessible too. I forgot to get on those sites with "controversal" information, so I'm not sure. I didn't have the feeling that sites were blocked though... But the connection... you could expect it was pretty darn slow ;-p

    --
    Don't quote me on this.
    1. Re:darn..... why did i forget.. by billatq · · Score: 1

      ... to test out the rumored blocked sites when I was in Tian Jin (a city near Beijing) a few weeks ago. Well, there I found a netcafe, and got online for a few hours. Slashdot was definately accesible there, and IIRC google was accessible too. I forgot to get on those sites with "controversal" information, so I'm not sure. I didn't have the feeling that sites were blocked though... But the connection... you could expect it was pretty darn slow ;-p

      I've heard that some cybercafes have proxy servers or the access that doesn't have blocks on it.

  64. Re:My site's blocked. Speculating why. by namtog · · Score: 1

    After checking your site and seeing that it really was blocked I was stunned. That prompted me to check my hobby site, namtog.com. It is also blocked. I can not believe it is the content. I took a screen shot. MNF is rarely dangerous, unless your on the field.

  65. But only today by xant · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Chinese government is reading /. today to find out what good sites they missed.

    --
    It's rare that you're presented with a knob whose only two positions are Make History and Flee Your Glorious Destiny.
    1. Re:But only today by The_Guv'na · · Score: 1

      Are the Chinese Government officials looking for sites to block or sites to bookmark? ;-)

    2. Re:But only today by askii64 · · Score: 0

      Probably both.

      --

      -This quite possibly mangled, stupid, demented comment was brought to you by Askii64.
  66. Maybe that's not the point... by JohnDenver · · Score: 2

    1. You don't have to be 100% effective to be effective.
    2. Maybe the point is to remind Chinese citizens they can filter any part of the Internet whenever they want. This keeps the censorship precident active, in the event they want to *really* lock down on unfavorable opinions.
    3. Maybe they want information to slowly seep into the country to reduce the risk of information shock.

    These sort of arguments apply well to content protection schemes. It doesn't have to work 100% to work.

    --
    "Communism is like having one [local] phone company " - Lenny Bruce
  67. Interesting... by inkfox · · Score: 1
    They seem to block the search engines which cache, however they seem to have forgotten The Wayback Machine. Oops!

    And no - this isn't tipping anyone off there... slashdot.org seems to be blocked too.

    --
    Says the RIAA: When you EQ, you're stealing bass!
  68. secured proxy by aderusha · · Score: 1

    i have a friend of mine that moved to china about a year ago. he had mentioned that a number of US media sites (cnn.com, msnbc.com, etc) were blocked. i set up cgiproxy, an anonymizing web proxy perl cgi - it's the script that runs anonymizer.com. my friend can now establish an ssl connection through a normal browser to jump around any webfiltering in place.

  69. So what exactly is blocked ? by bushboy · · Score: 1

    Is the "Real-Time Testing of Internet Filtering in China" actually working ?

    I'm struggling to find a site that's blocked and some of the URL's I've entered you'd expect to be blocked.

    www.tibet.com - now there's one that's "Reported as accessible in China"

    I think this test is seriously flawed...

    --
    A slashdotting - you get the stick first and then the carrot !
  70. The Chomsky archive is interesting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What about the Noam Chomsky archive? Whether you agree or disagree with him, he's certainly not irrelevant. Just look at his success with his book 9-11. No corporate media coverage, and he still makes the bestseller lists.

    1. Re:The Chomsky archive is interesting by tempmpi · · Score: 1

      znet.org just gives me:

      This Site is Planned for Development. In the Meantime, Try Searching the Internet for These Topics.[...(Search Engine advertising follows))

      Znet.org may contained interessting things, but they seem to be gone or moved now. Or the url was just wrong.

      --
      Jan
    2. Re:The Chomsky archive is interesting by cioxx · · Score: 1
  71. This article is now blocked.... by WhiteManInChina · · Score: 1

    I am a US citizen who has been living in China for almost 2 years. About 1 month after Bush's visit to China, a lot of previously blocked web sites, such as cnn.com, suddenly seemed to open up. However, close inspection revealed the evil truth. China has implemented filtering and logging on an amazing scale. Last year, China Telecom signed a contract to buy roughly $50M worth of custom networking hardware from Cisco. Since then, they have been "upgrading" the networks and international connections with hard-core filtering and logging. Thanks a LOT CISCO! They have also hired a small army of nerds to actively monitor and block specific articles or whole sites that are not part of the Chinese brainwashing program. When I read CNN, I have to use a proxy server to see the real propaganda from the US. They seem to block or altar most articles about China. I also have to change my proxy servers at least once a day. They are actively blocking proxy servers now.

    Interestingly, they seem to be watching /. nowadays. When this article was first posted, I had no difficulty reading it. Now, I have to use a proxy server to read it and make this post.

    sneaky bastards...

    There is no political solution to our troubled evolution.

  72. Re:You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can confirm what the AC above my post is saying. It is a Japanese imitation.

    I encourage you to watch your mouth when you are within a 5 foot radius of a Chinese person. However, I fully encourage your racist rantings in front of a Chinese Triad member to get an asskicking you deserve.

    Happy holidays, racist trash.

  73. /. 's blocked by China by tankrshr77 · · Score: 1

    Please wait for testing results. Full testing can take as long as 120 seconds.

    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://www.slashdot.org. Result:
    Reported as inaccessible in China

  74. Re:How accurate is this? by Ark42 · · Score: 1

    This is what I saw:

    http://www.nypost.com - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.google.com - Reported as inaccessible in China
    http://slashdot.org - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.bmezine.com - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.halturnershow.com - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.beliefnet.com - Reported as accessible in China
    http://145.94.54.56 - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.insex.com - Reported as accessible in China
    http://www.bukkake.com - Reported as accessible in China
    http://scimail.uwaterloo.ca - Reported as accessible in China

    I guess porn is good, but google is bad somehow..

  75. I'm the stileproject admin by toastyman · · Score: 2

    I'm the geek behind stileproject.com, camwhores.com(mentioned in another comment), etc.

    About a year ago, we had www.stileproject.com resolving to 6 different IP's in a round-robin DNS arrangement.

    Someone from China reported to us that we got blocked by the .cn government, but that every few days which IP of ours was blocked would change, but it was never more than one IP at a time, so he could still get in eventually.

    I'm not exactly sure why, but eventually they either gave up, or decided that the site's content wasn't worth banning anymore because they dropped it and nobody's emailed me in many months saying they were having problems.

    And yes, we've had several people from China send in subscriptions (always in cash, wrapped in a dozen sheets of paper) for camwhores.com. I think no matter what country you're in, there's some huge appeal of foreign porn. :)

  76. Can't believe no one has checked this yet... by Dthoma · · Score: 1
    Starting testing...
    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://cyber.law.harvard.edu/filtering/china/test/ . Result:

    Reported as accessible in China

    Seems that you can access the testing site itself from within China. :-)

    --

    Note to M1-ers: a curt but otherwise insightful message is not "Flamebait" or "Troll".

  77. need better filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    www.sfu.ca (my university) - inaccessible
    www.porn.com - accesible

    Lol, those commies are dumb.

    1. Re:need better filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps because at university you learn to think for yourself!

  78. I'd Tell You by dbCooper0 · · Score: 1

    ...but then they'd have to shoot me :(

    --
    db
    Cig:
    ôô
    /`
  79. Guess what... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    America is #1.

    Sorry to rub salt into your obvious wound, but that's how it is.

    Mark Oberg, proud American.

    (410)715-2440

  80. "inconsistent results" and proper interpretation by bedelman · · Score: 1

    Many thanks to all who suggested sites. Logs reflect a substantial number of newly-found blocked sites -- many of them going beyond the sites Professor Zittrain and I have been testing to date. (We've obtained sites tested to date using extraction from Yahoo and from Google.)

    There have been several messages in this forum about getting multiple results re certain sites of interest, slashdot and google in particular. It's certainly odd to see a given site listed as both "reported to be accessible" and "reported to be inaccessible" mere minutes apart. But as it turns out that's not an unusual result in our testing of China -- perhaps reflecting network congestion, perhaps round-robin DNS (using multiple IPs for a given host, and only one or several but not all IPs are blocked), perhaps some other factor yet to be determined. Accordingly, in our "final reporting" of blocked URLs (as distinguished from the preliminary results posted in real-time by the testing system), we'll report as "inaccessible" only those sites that pass a reasonably rigorous test ("inaccessible on at least 60% of tests, and inaccessible from at least three testing locations"). Meanwhile, http://code.law.harvard.edu/filtering/list.html should be taken only for what it is; I've added a link to the FAQ to the top of that page to encourage folks to read more on this subject. Most importantly, look for our forthcoming report -- expected later this fall -- which will detail the sites we in fact found to be inaccessible, consistently, over an extended period of time.

    Finally, a few readers asked whether the "test another url" form is working properly. I can confirm that it is. However, the testing site uses frames, so the URL listed in the Address Bar can in some instances get out of sync with what's really being tested. With any luck I'll fix this later this afternoon. My apologies for the confusion.

  81. Specific methods of blocking? by bedelman · · Score: 1

    Any thoughts on what technology or technologies China might be using to block access to specific web pages? My testing to date suggests that blocking is generally at the level of an entire IP -- affecting all web pages (and all virtual servers) hosted from that IP. This sort of blocking is straightforward -- just load a "blackhole" file into the router, and that's that. On the other hand, blocking specific pages is harder -- usually the kind of task that requires a proxy, with all the cost, complexit, and performance implications that entails. Is it your sense that that's what China is doing? Or something else? Any references available?

  82. The Real Deal.. by It's+Baby! · · Score: 1

    Okay, I've lived in China for the past 6-7 years from the beginning of net access to the cybercafes of today (except in Beijing :) where we are now.

    Anyhow, my observations, and daily experience is such:

    Email is not a problem. About as reliable as in the states, with certain exceptions when the infrastructure is having problems, like when they cut that trans pacific cable a few years back, and other nonsense.

    Almost EVERYTHING is accessible, in terms of content, from Pr0n to anti-China news.

    There are a few sticklers, like:

    The Chinese Association of Students and Scolars
    (which has a lot of Tiananmen rhetoric up)

    MAJOR news sites, like CNN, WashingtonPost, LATimes, ChicagoTribune, etc.
    (But who gives a damn!? Most of their articles are bought from wire services and you can still read them on Yahoo!, MSNBC, ABCNEWS, Google's cache, etc. I mean, Chinese business interests still have to keep up on their stock portfolios!)

    Many of the "Free Website Services" are blocked because people put up all kinds of shit (that can't find funding or a feasible business model) there anyhow. (mostly lots of anti-China, China Democracy movement, and Fa Lun Gong, and Tiananmen rhetoric)

    >> Side note: Don't blast me because I use the work 'rhetoric'... I use it both ways, to describe all kinds of people that keep moaning about the same damn things instead of getting anything done about them. I know people who were 'fasting' in Tiananmen, and what CNN didn't tell you, like: Ice Cream, Yoghurt, and Beer are not considered food, so they could have those. And, the fast was only during the daytime. After nighttime many of the students went ahead and ate. It was more of a WoodStock to most of the Yoots invovled, at least before the tanks rolled in.. much the same as the protests on the American Embassy after the 'bombing' of the Chinese Embassy in Yugoslavia.::

    Anyhow.. I don't think this is such a big deal to most people on the Internet in China. Most people are just happy to get online, play games, see what's going on in the outside world, etc.

    Most CHINESE CHINESE (i.e. Not involved with the foreign community enough to speak English on a daily basis) don't have any interest in going to most of the sites mentioned because it's IN A FOREIGN LANGUAGE! They're content to get most of their information from sites like Sina, Sohu, Tomtom, etc.

    Most ENGLISH SPEAKING CHINESE are independent enough to get news from multiple sources if they want English news, but for the most part, it's through interactions with people, and not through spending time online checking websites. China has much to great a social life (i.e. you actually get out and meet people instead of being holed up in front of a glowing screen) for them to spend isolated looking for information on English websites. Why look it up when you can just talk about something over dinner with friends?

    Most FOREIGNERS in China follow the ENGLISH SPEAKING CHINESE habit (or vica versa), but still fall into the morning 8-10am massive news surfing habit because they want to keep up to date on what's going on back at home, or simply can't read Chinese news and need something to comfort them.

    In any case, in China everyone's so freakin' international that if there's something they can't get access to, we just send an email off to a friend and ask them to send us the text from a particular URL.

    No, it's not INSTANT GRATIFICATION like in the US, but it's manageable without too much hassle. I'd say nine days out of ten it doesn't really matter.

    It's more of a token demonstration than anything. The more you point it out, the more valuable the token becomes.

    If anyone wants more specific insights into China's internet, send me email.

  83. What it's like? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Someone shared me the awful feel of being filtered out by the great firewall; bigger sites which are blocked: time.com, geocities.com (it's unblocked after Yahoo's purchase), and most sites which has the smell of democracy, tiananmen, tibet, etc. They also told me that web based proxy/anonymizer are mostly blocked.

  84. Just returned back from china this week by Ramen+Noodles · · Score: 1

    Spent time visiting several cities in china. Shanghai, Chengdu, Beijing CNN was accessible, only sometimes. Slashdot was accessible, only sometimes. Yahoo was accessible. The Great Firewall works, only sometimes.

  85. Re:Deport ALL mexicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We first hang the republicans, then deport the spics.

  86. Email by nizcolas · · Score: 1

    I noticed someone posted that they had no problem getting email through, I thought this odd after something my father told me.

    My dad is in a program whose focus is to teach Chinese students English via (email) correspondance course. The course is sponsored by a Christian organization.

    The problem my dad was having is that he was able to receive the emails from the students, but the students informed him that they were not able to receive his emails. My dad asked the organization if they had any ideas what was going on and they were baffled. Finally through a series of trial and error my dad found out that if you did not fill in the subject line, the message made it through.

    Again I'm less certain about this after reading the other post about email. Maybe my dad's address has made it into the "Western Devil" blacklist ;)

    ~nico

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
  87. I think you got it. by twitter · · Score: 2
    The real effectiveness lies in isolating those who know things. MOST people are not going to bother to cirumvent the filter and will continue to have their world shaped by the party. When and if you ever displease the party, "hacker" will be added to your list of crimes and no one will have any idea what you are talking about. You brought it on yourself your friends can say as they turn their back on you.

    I see the same kind of thing right here in the good USA. I just got burnt for "excessive" personal internet usage at my engineering job. My peers don't know what a google search is much less slashdot. Trying to explain that this a software news site and that I read it in part to keep up programing skill would be futile. Other people listen to online music, read CNN and other less work related things with impunity.

    As freedoms and personal dignity wane here, the rest of the world will suffer that much more.

    Look for your ability to post anything that would require filtering anywhere to go away. As multinational publishers and telcoms continue to gobble up the web, your ability to publish uncensored pages goes away.

    Anyone else want to build alternate networks? Think light and radio based backbone nodes with 811.b local distribution. No, I don't want to republish RIAA crap, swap porn or other Warez. What I want is the ability to publish MY content without AOL/McDisneySoft looking over my shoulder at my big five megs of advert wracked Geo Cities "web" pages.

    When all the censors finish their work, what's left will be a serries of billboards not worth browsing.

    End Rant.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  88. the plan by Atonomous+Coward · · Score: 1

    phase one: Switch toward capitalism phase two: filter a bunch of sites phase three: ????? phase four: Profit!

  89. Re:You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know what would happen if he did that? Nothing. They would probably laugh because they are as equally racist themselves. The Chinese don't have an inferiority complex like the niggers.

  90. Need in the mother of invention. by fulldecent · · Score: 1
    I propose a solution to the problem of "un-warranted" proxy servers in general. Regardless of the ethics of such a notion, I'm expressing a way of attacking this:

    I propose that to handle the distribution and maitenance of live/cached data, we resort to the P2P method. Persons from inside (china) will have self-propogating lists of servers that may get the information they need. "Pirates" that host tunnels and other exploits will be easily recognized as "super nodes" and free, external or "alternate configurations" of DNS server can be listed.

    In overview, internal users, will be constantly searching for content cached on other internal users' computers, while live content will sucessfully seep through holes in the great firewall by means of private piracy and exploitable errors in the system. Moreover, this application would allow the fastest collaboration of network status's and trade instability for redundancy.

    I hope this inspires a revolution to such an extensive feat of censorship.

    --

    -- I was raised on the command line, bitch

  91. Heh... by Fogbank · · Score: 1

    riaa.org is reported as inaccessible.

    So there.

    --
    Ciao,
    Foggy
  92. Re: Decentralized blocking rules? by iconian · · Score: 1

    I stayed at a person's home in a city in southern China and I was able to access, to my surprise, cnn.com, nytimes.com, yahoo.com. and slashdot.org. Recently, back in the US, I tried exchanging photos via photos.yahoo.com with 2 people living in two different cities of China but they told me they were not able to see the pictures (still not 100% sure if it's a communication or firewall problem). It's strange how different people who visited China are reporting different experiences. Maybe the great firewall of China is not centralized?

  93. Re:My site's blocked. Speculating why. by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

    The firewall blocks sites by IP, so sites like yours are collatoral damage when one server hosts a lot of sites (called vhosting), one of which has probably been deemed objectionable.

    Other people have said that Geocities is inaccessible, but it looks like your actual site is still accessible. Just tell all the Chinese Monday Night Football fans to go directly to the Geocities site.

  94. uh, WTF. Moderator? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why hasn't this post been moderated as INFLAMMATORY, OFFENSIVE, or TROLL? Why is the full body even listed at the top level? Or perhaps the slashdot mod on this thread has a tendency to look the other way?

    You, deadb0lt, are a prime example of the Walking Braindead.

  95. Sourceforge virtual sites blocked by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to live in Shanghai the biggest problem I had was sourceforges virtual domains for the projects are blocked so you can't get to the project home pages. This was reported and verified with sourceforge. Now taking it up with the Chinese goverment is a diffrent matter but hey maybe the firewall guys in china read slashdot :)

  96. Re:Deport ALL mexicans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    NO! The problem is NOT the wetbacks, it's the FROSTBACKS from CANDA!

    Get rid of Peter Motherfucking Jennings, Michael Jackass Fox, and Joe Fucking Lieberman.

    WE DON'T NEED NO CANADIANS. NO STINKING FUCKING CANADIANS.

  97. An oddity by i+am+fishhead · · Score: 1

    The filter seems to block my school's main site, but not the CS Department's site. Any Ideas?

  98. Harvard: Where's Wan Yanhai? (Open Sources) by Jamyang · · Score: 1
    China's most prominent AIDS activist has been "disappeared" - believed to have been detained by the police, relatives and human rights groups said Wednesday. img scr="BLANK IMAGE"

    Many reporters have highlighted Wan's work in raising awareness about HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, - and also Gay & Lesbian rights in China. CPJ also highlight Wan's role as a webmaster - and as a leading critic of Beijing's neo-fascist Information enviroment, and cult-like Pledge of Self-Discipline Yahoo!

    CPJ concerned about safety of Web publisher

    Wan Yanhai is a courageous man - our thoughts are with him, Su Zhaosheng - his wife, and his family.

    Read: The Great Firewall of China, by Xiao Qiang, Executive Director, HRIC - and CPJ's Asia Research Associate Sophie Beach, from the L.A. Times of August 25, 2002....

    http://www.aizhi.org/ [aizhi.org]

    Starting testing...

    Stage one testing complete.
    Stage two testing complete.

    Testing complete for http://www.aizhi.org/.
    Result:

    Reported as accessible in China

    Tested at request of Greg Walton,
    China's Golden Shield, Corporate complicity in the development of surveillance technology in China Le bouclier d'or de la Chine

    Open Source Intelligence

    Http://go.openflows.org [openflows.org]

    Related stories:

    Where is Wan Yanhai?
    China's most prominent AIDS activist has been "disappeared" - believed to have been detained by the police, relatives and human rights groups said yesterday.

    China Net Spies


    ...there was recent evidence that state censors had removed the blocks on some banned Web sites to see who tried to access them. "The reverse-trace route monitoring we do on a regular basis shows a surprising number of interesting sites that were once blocked are now going through, but with anomalous traffic signatures, suggesting some systematic surveillance of sensitive sites. Perhaps the PSB [Public Security Bureau] is trying to learn more about surfing habits," he said.

    The "Great Firewall" is failing
    Beyond the Great Firewall - from censorship to surveillance
    Gartner: China's Internet Strategy: Struggling to Maintain the "Great Firewall"
    China, Nortel, and the Net

    or Ethan Gutmann's Who Lost China's Internet?

    if you're still interested.....Chapter Two of the private RAND study published Tuesday, "You've got dissent"offers an authoritative analysis of the evolving, multi-layered counter-netwar strategies deployed in the PRC -> increasingly redistributing the focus of the so-called "Great Firewall" from the International Gateways, through the ISPs and out to the cybercafes [;-)cracked versions of these filters available], the possibility of .cn ISPs setting policy on individuals' firewalls in offices and homes

    Endnotes: Zi Xiang Mao Dun

    P2P geektivists could note a parallel decentralisation of resources in the Future Trends section, in Chapter One for more on innovation at the Edge of the network:

    "Dissidents, Falungong practitioners, and other activists in the PRC and abroad may increasingly turn to emerging peer-to-peer technology to exchange information."

    All this augurs a mighty struggle deep indside China's networks in the coming years, but with China sending dissidents to mental hospitals a culture of self-censorship is probably the gravest challenge to free experssion.

    Note to CowBoyNeal,language barrier: this installation has problems with Chinese charcters - there'd probably be people out there who have modified SLASHcode to handle Chinese UNICODE, and perhaps publish automatically to USENET, Freenet etc.

    they'd probably also find time to translate this thread.

    i'd like to go on, but some government employed s'kripty in Yunan's is busy thinking he can backdoor my network - its not an ethical thing - its the aesthetics i've got a problem with...so crude, juvenile. I'll leave you with a final link

    1. Re:Harvard: Where's Wan Yanhai? (Open Sources) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      1675/2002.09.01

      VIP Reference(Dacankao) Defends Human Rights in PRC Since 1997

      for subscription, send email to: Beijing@LiPeng.ORG
      for proxy servers, email to: ip@privatehop.com

  99. Re:You are an idiot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh its you, the white trash posting various anti-non-europeans messages here!

    They would probably laugh because they are as equally racist themselves.

    I know many collegues and friends of Chinese descent, and I can tell you for a fact that their "racist tendencies" are far below that of DeadBolt's.

    The Chinese don't have an inferiority complex like the niggers.

    Ha, say that in front of a black person and you will likely get a beatdown. Try south central L.A. Go on. I dare you.

  100. A possible explanation by bedelman · · Score: 1

    1) They're on different IPs.

    and,

    2) There's something else on the first IP that China doesn't like. You might be able to find it (try a google search on "china site:www.caltech.edu"). You might not.

    Remember, all indications to date (to my knowledge, at least) are the filtering operates at the granularity of an entire IP address. If so, there's no way to block just one page or directory or even domain name (if multiple domain names are hosted on the same IP, as is of course standard these days). So China might "have" to block www.caltech.edu notwithstanding that the page they "want" to block is www.caltech.edu/deep/link/path/filename.html .

  101. I come from china, the block list not all aviable by liaobin · · Score: 1

    I can visit slashdot.org, yahoo.

    but I can not visit sf.net in last month,
    I can not visit google in last day.

  102. I'm Chinese, and I'm in China by z01d · · Score: 0

    yes, it's fascistic

    as far as i know, the Great Firewall is not that simple, it's not only based on IP address filter, it do filter IP packet, i mean, even if i use some proxy server outside the wall, i still can not access some website (the proxy itself is not been blocked), i doubt the wall is based on content filter: if it find some sensitive words (mostly, the domain name of the website) in an IP packet, it just throw it out as junk.

    i don't know if this comments will be seen by the slashdot editor, but i really don't like to see this kind story on slastdot, because CCP are fascistic, they are insane, they even banned sourceforge, they can ban slashdot in no time. i just afraid....

    1. Re:I'm Chinese, and I'm in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yes CCP are facsist

    2. Re:I'm Chinese, and I'm in China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      do not be afraid

  103. China Blocked from my Firewall by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 2

    With the multiple ssh and other scans, combined with so many spam images hosted in China, I have most of China's major ISPs blocked at my firewall. I have a network to protect.

    I figure that just blocking off the ISP is better than notifying them that they have someone trying to tunnel through my servers. What would an ISP there do after investigating logs to see who it was?

  104. Major DNS problem in China (31/8) by AtomicBomb · · Score: 2

    Probe that later on. Many parts of China got hit by major DNS problem on 31/8, Beijing time. So the results were not at all reliable during the first 12 hours after this story was posted in slashdot.

  105. Yes by Jamyang · · Score: 1
    Chapter Two of the private RAND study published Tuesday, "You've got dissent"offers an authoritative analysis of the evolving, multi-layered counter-netwar strategies deployed in the PRC -> increasingly redistributing the focus of the so-called "Great Firewall" from the International Gateways, through the ISPs and out to the cybercafes [;-)cracked versions of these filters available], the possibility of .cn ISPs setting policy on individuals' firewalls in offices and homes

    Endnotes: Zi Xiang Mao Dun

    P2P geektivists could note a parallel decentralisation of resources in the Future Trends section, in Chapter One for more on innovation at the Edge of the network:

    "Dissidents, Falungong practitioners, and other activists in the PRC and abroad may increasingly turn to emerging peer-to-peer technology to exchange information."

  106. It's the Google cache by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    People are using it to axcess the google cache mirrors of blocked sites

  107. Nothing like helping the Chinese to do it. by TrebleJunkie · · Score: 1

    Okay. So, the Chinese Ministry of Keepin' the Brotha Down is going to see all these experimental packets bouncing off or whizzing past the firewall while we Free Stupid People go bouncing the URLS/Addresses of our favorite probably-controversial-and-harmful-to-the-people-i n-china web sites, and you don't think those sites that aren't blocked are going to end up that way before long?

    Idiots. Quit helping them out.

    --

    Ed R.Zahurak

    You know, oblivion keeps looking better every day.

  108. Friends report Wan Yan Hai is safe (Open Sources) by Jamyang · · Score: 1
    Friends say Wan Yanhai is 'safe,' but protesters Monday urged Beijing to explain his disappearance.

    -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
    Version: PGPfreeware 7.0.3 for non-commercial use
    iQA/AwUAPXQLctA2woXcpyGSEQKBfgCg42njJxBK7j1lxMlOWN
    rvTVqpveEAoOBu q3qWmzI5pomj9p81ccR68zNR
    =RyNf
    -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

  109. Your Excellency: Where's Google? by Jamyang · · Score: 1
    Via facsimile: (202) 588-0032

    Your Excellency:

    The Committee to Protect Journalists (CPJ) is very concerned by the Chinese government's apparent blocking of domestic access to the Google Internet search engine. Such censorship directly affects China-based journalists' ability to conduct research and impedes citizens' access to news that is unavailable in China's tightly controlled domestic media. . .facsimile

  110. Cisco sells routers, switches to China Telecom - by Jamyang · · Score: 1
    - meanwhile, China Mobile Picks Nortel:

    Cisco Systems, said on Thursday it will supply routers and switches to help the Shanghai unit of China's largest telecom operator upgrade its network. Cisco did not disclose details of the contract. . .(reuters/ZDnet) Meanwhile, China Mobile Picks Nortel: Leveraging the Optical Ethernet capabilities of Nortel Networks metropolitan optical portfolio, the Shanghai network will support real-time, mission-critical data applications, including Shanghai Mobile's evolving Business Operation Support System (BOSS), billing and network management. . .