If the King were actually revered and if he actually doesn't like the law, he would have it repealed. Logic dictates that he must approve of the law, or that he is actually just a figure-head of the real government. Either way, he's a shit-head child-rapist.
A lot of people gamble for the fun of it, you know. There is value to the thrill of potential winnings, and that value may very well be greater than the dollar amount spent.
Granted, there are a lot of suckers too, especially in Vegas.
Voting for the lesser evil never works. Here's why: every candidate's campaign is run entirely on the premise that they must look less evil than their opponents. So, "less evil" only means that you were swayed by their campaign. It says nothing for how evil they are. Additionally, "less evil" in US politics means they would only torture you a little before slitting your throat. Either way you end up tortured and dead.
US Congressmen have no say in their State's government (that I am aware of, for any State), so blaming them for their State's mismanagement is unfair.
Now, I happen to feel that "politician" is just another word for mass-murderer, and that none of them deserve a break, unless its to their spine. But you can't blame their State's fiscal problems on them.
The entire purpose of the Republican party is to take the US to Feudalism. The current economy and the governmental gridlock is entirely according to plan.
You may be correct that the top 1% of the wealthy won't increase tax revenues by a significant amount, but until someone making twice what I do actually pays the same RATE, never mind the same dollar amount, I believe taxes should be raised.
It is not fair that those who earn more pay a lower rate. Either there should be one rate, or the rate should increase as income increases. No other option is fair.
You may be technically correct, but most malware for Windows are not viruses. No OS is secure from Trojans, and that's the category most malware falls into.
It's not a security flaw because the code to disable it must be running as administrator. Once you have admin credentials, there is no security, by definition.
How about you get a working mind and then reconsider.
1) MS already has an AV product, and they've had it for a few years. In terms of resource usage, it's the best available for Windows. It is updated very frequently, and it complains if you haven't updated the definitions in the past week.
2) The developers working on AV software in general are way better at it than you are. If the current approaches could be scrapped for something better, they would be.
That's not how it works. Free Speech is a right, but only idiots claim that means one can take over a private conference hall to make ones self heard. The right only means, as the Constitution states, that Congress shall make no law abridging this right. Similarly, an amendment to make Internet access an inalienable right would simply prevent Congress from taking it away. It would not mean that private enterprise or individuals would be forced to provide access.
Slashdot Mirror
If the King were actually revered and if he actually doesn't like the law, he would have it repealed. Logic dictates that he must approve of the law, or that he is actually just a figure-head of the real government. Either way, he's a shit-head child-rapist.
Just because you can't take your phone from one carrier to another does not mean that you have no choices.
Have you tried to buy cold medication in the past half-dozen years? The next step will to make it prescription-only, followed by an outright ban.
Face it, American Law is all about punishing the innocent to inconvenience the guilty.
Ignore the troll, or sign him for lots of spam at mipak@yahoo.com.
A lot of people gamble for the fun of it, you know. There is value to the thrill of potential winnings, and that value may very well be greater than the dollar amount spent.
Granted, there are a lot of suckers too, especially in Vegas.
Given your numbers, we only need to cut spending to just under ~$2.5T to lower the debt. So, it can be done without raising taxes.
It won't be done that way, but it could be done that way.
That's a false dichotomy. The military is an entitlement program.
Voting for the lesser evil never works. Here's why: every candidate's campaign is run entirely on the premise that they must look less evil than their opponents. So, "less evil" only means that you were swayed by their campaign. It says nothing for how evil they are. Additionally, "less evil" in US politics means they would only torture you a little before slitting your throat. Either way you end up tortured and dead.
US Congressmen have no say in their State's government (that I am aware of, for any State), so blaming them for their State's mismanagement is unfair.
Now, I happen to feel that "politician" is just another word for mass-murderer, and that none of them deserve a break, unless its to their spine. But you can't blame their State's fiscal problems on them.
Corporations vote all the time. They call it lobbying, we call it bribery. In the end, it's just (buying) votes.
The entire purpose of the Republican party is to take the US to Feudalism. The current economy and the governmental gridlock is entirely according to plan.
The last time was 2012
Really? No wonder the Republi-shits can't get any governing done. They are too busy fucking around with a time machine.
You may be correct that the top 1% of the wealthy won't increase tax revenues by a significant amount, but until someone making twice what I do actually pays the same RATE, never mind the same dollar amount, I believe taxes should be raised.
It is not fair that those who earn more pay a lower rate. Either there should be one rate, or the rate should increase as income increases. No other option is fair.
Wow. You are a truly sanctimonious asshole. It's all about you, is it?
Should I wait to stop murdering until someone tells me to stop? If something is illegal, it's illegal. It doesn't matter what your opinion is.
Well, your ass comes pre-partitioned. So, I'd hope, anyway.
You may be technically correct, but most malware for Windows are not viruses. No OS is secure from Trojans, and that's the category most malware falls into.
It's not a security flaw because the code to disable it must be running as administrator. Once you have admin credentials, there is no security, by definition.
It's really annoying when idiots who obviously do nothing to keep up with the topic at hand spew nonsense like this.
Run SE on your home machine and see if you remember it's even installed a month later.
How about you get a working mind and then reconsider.
1) MS already has an AV product, and they've had it for a few years. In terms of resource usage, it's the best available for Windows. It is updated very frequently, and it complains if you haven't updated the definitions in the past week.
2) The developers working on AV software in general are way better at it than you are. If the current approaches could be scrapped for something better, they would be.
And how exactly would a white list help?
That wouldn't help. You still need an administrator and that account better be able to run non-MS software.
That's funny. My OS X devices aren't running any AV software. Run's running SL and the other Lion.
Dr. Bob is your ex-wife?!
That's OK. Your post also means that you're a demented idiot. It's a shame there's no law banning you from the Internet.
That's not how it works. Free Speech is a right, but only idiots claim that means one can take over a private conference hall to make ones self heard. The right only means, as the Constitution states, that Congress shall make no law abridging this right. Similarly, an amendment to make Internet access an inalienable right would simply prevent Congress from taking it away. It would not mean that private enterprise or individuals would be forced to provide access.
The Bible does not list an age for the Universe, nor even for planet Earth.