Slashdot Mirror


Baker Has to Make 102,000 Cupcakes For Grouponers

Rachel Brown, owner of the small Need a Cake bakery, became a victim of the old adage, "Be careful what you wish for. You might just get it." More than 8,500 people took Rachel up on her Groupon offer of a 75% discount on a dozen cupcakes, forcing her to make over 100,000 cupcakes to fill all the orders. In the end Brown lost almost $20k. "We take pride in making cakes of exceptional quality but I had to bring in agency staff on top of my usual staff, who had nowhere near the same skills. I was very worried about standards dropping and hated the thought of letting anybody down. My poor staff were having to slog away at all hours — one of them even came in at 3 a.m. because she couldn't sleep for worry," she told The Telegraph. "We are still working to make up the lost money and will not be doing this again."

611 comments

  1. The Law of Unintended Consequences... by CanHasDIY · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The 'Law of Unintended Consequences' strikes again!

    75% off is a seriously deep discount, what did she expect would happen?

    --
    An enigma, wrapped in a riddle, shrouded in bacon and cheese
    1. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Surt · · Score: 1, Interesting

      She must have had some pretty serious margins to only lose $20k on a 75% discount after paying for extra staff.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    2. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Governments offer free benefits to immigrants and what do they expect?

      They "expect" only the ones needing it the most or the "hard luck cases" will be the only ones taking the help...

      Instead the ruthless amoral ones come in and take full advantage while the ones actually needing the help who are good people who are too prideful to take the handouts.

      So you end up with people immigrating to counties for the "welfare state" who don't even like the country and sometimes even loathe it, but do it for the freebies. And people wonder why Europe is becomming such a mess....

      DUH!

    3. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by JustOK · · Score: 5, Funny

      I don't think they understood what could happen when the passed that law.

      --
      rewriting history since 2109
    4. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Nowhere in TFA does it actually say she lost $20k, and in fact the article is from The Telegraph and the business is based in London, so all currency in TFA is in pounds. In fact it says she lost between £2.50 and £3 per batch, which means she lost between £21,250 and £25,500, which would mean she lost close to $40k. More relevant to your comment, she lost £2.50 and £3 per batch selling at £6.50, so it costs her a little over £9 to make a dozen cupcakes which she normally sells for £26, so yes, she has some healthy margins, although not totally unreasonable for food products where you have an awful lot of waste (anything you don't sell by the end of the day is trash). Though I also don't really understand who the hell pays £26 for a dozen cupcakes.

    5. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      It was tough, but I just knew someone would find a way to insert a retarded political commentary into this story. Congratulations, AC! You are today's winner on "Who Wants To Be A Fucking Retard!"

    6. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some one at Goupon must have sold her a "bill of goods".
      75% discount must be below her cost of goods sold.

      Why would anyone do that ??

      Would you discount your labor by 75% ??

    7. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by The+Pirou · · Score: 3, Informative

      Most baking is on a very low margin because of the bulk batches made by the Baker. Bread, Doughnuts, Pastries, and such can all be under 6% even utilizing 'expensive' ingredients like nuts and fruit. It's laborious, but only requires a few people to have any actual skill depending on the situation because of easy recipes.

      I'm surprised she didn't approach a local culinary school if her cupcakes took such skill to prepare and create.

    8. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by couchslug · · Score: 1

      I smell bullshit. Given the markup on baked goods selling them at 25-percent of RETAIL should still make money.

      Money "not made" /= "net loss".

      --
      "This post is an artistic work of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact."
    9. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 4, Informative

      Most baking is on a very low margin because of the bulk batches made by the Baker.

      Well, for chain stores, sure. My wife runs a bakery - specialty cake shop - and margins have to be higher because of specialized ingredients, lower volume, personalized decorating, and so forth. It tastes a lot better than the bulk-produced stuff you get at Costco or Sam's or even the grocery story, but it costs noticeably more, too.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    10. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I smell bullshit. Given the markup on baked goods selling them at 25-percent of RETAIL should still make money.

      Money "not made" /= "net loss".

      groupon itself takes 50% of (discounted) revenue, so she would have seen 12.5%

    11. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by rickb928 · · Score: 1

      Don't forget Groupon gets a cut of this. And it ain't 25%.

      --
      deleting the extra space after periods so i can stay relevant, yeah.
    12. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2

      They're a direct-to-customer operation -- there's no wholesale step. It's not a fully automated industrial bakery, and that's part of their attraction to the clientele. The loss of efficiency is partly offset by the lack of middlemen.

      --
      Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
    13. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Enry · · Score: 1

      You'd hope for increased business. Think of it as a promotion or loss leader to get people in the door.

    14. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by timbo234 · · Score: 1

      Super expensive 'gourmet' cup cake bakeries are a fad right now in London, that's how she can get away with 26 quid for a dozen.

      --
      Pre-canned Evolution Links for all those Slashdot holy wars.
    15. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by LibRT · · Score: 1

      You're right: she lost just $0.20 per cupcake at a 75% discount. So if the normal price of her cupcakes is $1/each, her gross margin is 55%, and if the normal price is $2/each, it's 65%. But I don't think anyone's getting rich making cupcakes - haven't heard of any "cupcake billionaires".

      Fuck. Now I have a craving for a cupcake...anyone have a groupon handy?

    16. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      A ton of these have sprung up in the Washington DC area. My girlfriend heard about this great cupcake place and wanted to check it out. So we went. It's very upscale. I was shocked at both the fact that it existed and that it was so expensive. I then found out there were a bunch of other places just like it.

      Actually, when I was in New York two months ago, we passed by one that was selling miniature cupcakes.

      From what I can tell it's some kind of current trend / fad. It doesn't make sense to me since I can bake a dozen of these things for $2-$3, but they seem to be getting enough business to support multiple of this type of store in the same area.

    17. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Well, it worked. Now what?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    18. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by LordCrank · · Score: 2

      Groupon only gives the actual vendors half the money, so if a groupon user paid £6.50 the retailer would receive £3.25, so she was spending about £6 to make a dozen cupcakes and charging £26. Those are indeed some very healthy margins.

    19. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by TVDinner · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I owned a mall-based cookie/cafe store and also a pretzel store. Margins on meal normally run 3x-4x the cost of ingredients to account for labor, electricity, waste, etc. that the poster stated above. But the margin on bakery goods depends on the holding time of the good. The longer the item lasts, the lower the margin needed. On the cookies we sold, the holding time was 3-4 hours and the margin was around 6x-7x. For pretzels, the holding time was 30 minutes and the margins are around 30x-40x. That pretzel you buy at the mall is SERIOUSLY cheap to make, but you throw them out ALL the time because they get stale so quickly. My favorite item to sell was bottled water. Lasted basically forever and and I made 10x margin on it; even better than my fountain drinks. And believe me, it's true when they say most of the profits a store makes is between Thanksgiving and Christmas. the busy season at the mall really helps because you crank out goods and your not throwing stale items away like you do during a normal period.

    20. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by poetmatt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      so basically, she made a completely moronic business decision, but the article's slant is that it is the fault of groupon? Is this woman not aware she could have set these at a price that would have been reasonable as opposed to bankrupting?

    21. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      she has some healthy margins

      from a pure economic point of view

      MR=MC so her marginal cost is probably somewhere around £17. If not she is leaving money on the table. The 9 is probably just material cost plus some labor. It also depends on who her market is. She may be small enough that 26 is reasonable for someone to buy (think birthdays and CEO functions...)

      Some people see to think everyone should sell everything at cost. Which means no one would make anything. Unless they wanted to donate it.

      Or as one guy who I met who did this sort of thing for many years. "Sell it for about double what it costs you to make it. You will come out a bit ahead. If you have a smaller market bump the price a bit." Its a axiom that holds mostly true for most things you want to sell. Only places like walmart and mcdonalds can afford to make 10 cents on 2 dollars cost. As they have the volume for it.

    22. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Excellent comment except for this:

      ...the business is based in London, so all currency in TFA is in pounds.

      TFA says "...Need a Cake bakery in Reading, Berkshire...". That's not in London. It's near London, but a quick glance at a map shows that it's certainly not in London.

    23. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Enry · · Score: 1

      Well, it may have worked. Depends on if business picks up over time, but it's unlikely it will pick up enough to offset the losses.

    24. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by ThorGod · · Score: 1

      You had me until you converted currencies wrong. 21,250 pounds = 1.3520 * (21,250) dollars = 28730 dollars, 25,500 pounds = 34476 dollars.

      --
      PS: I don't reply to ACs.
    25. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      She didn't think she'd get that level of response and cause spiraling labor costs. Prepared food has a pretty impressive margin and 75% probably wouldn't have hurt her too bad if it didn't require extra labor hours/personnel which drove the cost of making the cupcake through the roof. Just a guess though.

    26. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by The+Pirou · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've only ever baked for 'mom and pop' affairs, so I wouldn't know about chain stores. The first time was for a boss who started with $500 and 2 credit cards 18 years ago and turned it all into a well known gourmet market in the Atlanta area. Another time was for another well known DIY restaurant/bakery in town.
      My mother was a pastry chef who has made cakes similar to those on the website of your wife since I was 3 years old. I know the costs and labor involved to make make breads, cakes and other assorted patisserie fair. There is still an insanely low margin on baking using 'fancy' ingredients.

      As for Groupon...Groupon costs a lot in food costs, and 2 years later I hadn't seen any significant change in sales that could've been attributed to their involvement.

    27. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by sys_mast · · Score: 1

      Yes, why didn't the groupon get priced at a point that is break even? Isn't the point of groupon to generate a ton(not metric ton, but a high volume) of customer traffic?

      --
      Those who can, do.
    28. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Okay - that comment of yours ("I don't think they understood..."). That is precious comedy. Others might get the sardonic subtlety - I'm just saying it's high art... Well played.

    29. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Talderas · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The fault of GroupOn is an inability to set limits in the number of coupons issued. A 75% discount was probably still profit for her but that profit was erased because the quantity of coupons from GroupOn vastly exceeded her production capability so she had to hire more employees to meet the demand. That is expensive. If GroupOn allowed a limit to the number of coupons, say 2,500 then she many not have needed the extra employees and not suffered the losses from it.

      --
      "Lack of speed can be overcome. In the worst case by patience." --Znork
    30. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by jimicus · · Score: 2

      She couldn't. Groupon won't run the deal unless it's fantastically good - on the order of 60-80% off. On top of that they then take 50% of the coupon cost.

      In theory you're supposed to keep the details of all the customers and sell them stuff at a later date - though lots of businesses have reported that this can be nigh-on impossible. The sort of customer who takes you up on a 75% offer is frequently the sort of customer who would never pay full price under any circumstances.

      What she should have done was limited it to 100 customers. But I'm given to understand Groupon have this habit of using all sorts of high-pressure tactics to assure you there's no way you'll wind up with more customers you can cope with, and under these circumstances it'd be silly to limit it to 100 customers when prospect number 101 could be the one who keeps coming back.

    31. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Local+ID10T · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've used Groupon for my business.

      The idea is to consider it a marketing expense -you are paying for customer eyeballs (our estimate was we were exposed to 400,000 customers who had never heard of us before), not expecting to make a profit on the items that the Groupon customers buy.. but you don't want to actually LOSE money on any sales.

      --
      "You want to know how to help your kids? Leave them the fuck alone." -George Carlin
    32. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by JWSmythe · · Score: 2

      8,500 people took the offer. the story says £2.50 to £3.00 per dozen loss. That's £21,250 to £25,500 loss. She had to hire on extra staff at £12,500.

      Her ad was: "Twelve Cupcakes with a Choice of Flavours and Designs for £6.50 from Need a Cake (Value £26)" I won't try to guess her profit margin, as that would be total guess work. We can calculate that she would have expected £221,000, but only was paid £55,250. That doesn't include any charges that Groupon may have charged her to run the ad.

      I've seen other stories on the topic. Groupon pushes for unreasonably low prices, to be a loss leader. It does drive business, but does not usually result in other sales. It's dirty marketing that ends up hurting the businesses that they are servicing.

      Sure, she should have stuck with £1 over cost (including staff and utilities). They hard sell to get you to drop your price as low as possible. It's inexperienced business people falling for a great sales pitch and promises of huge returns. It does Groupon good, where they will keep membership interested. For the cupcake shop, they may end up closing the doors.

      --
      Serious? Seriousness is well above my pay grade.
    33. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Rary · · Score: 5, Insightful

      so basically, she made a completely moronic business decision, but the article's slant is that it is the fault of groupon? Is this woman not aware she could have set these at a price that would have been reasonable as opposed to bankrupting?

      From TFA:

      Mrs Brown, who had only expected a few hundred orders, said that the experience was “without doubt, the worst ever business decision I have made”.

      Sounds like she's well aware that she made a bad business decision. What the article doesn't clearly state is what options Groupon provided her in terms of prices she could offer or limitations on the number of groupons sold. At the end of the article, a Groupon representative says that there was no limit placed on the number sold, and that "(w)e approach each business with a tailored, individual approach based on the prior history of similar deals." This doesn't really tell us much, but it is entirely possible that Groupon sold Mrs. Brown on the idea by providing her with unrealistic expectations based on "prior history of similar deals".

      It's also possible that she isn't actually blaming Groupon at all. The article makes that claim, but the quotes from Mrs. Brown only talk about her own underestimation of the response to the deal.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    34. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      Well, it worked. Now what?

      Now she moans about it to the telegraph and any other rag that will listen.
      She lost about $40,000 (USD) during this promotion, but her normal price is $40 (USD) for a dozen cupcakes. I think she can handle a $40,000 hit.
      I've never even been to the British Isles and even I know this is your typical "White, Middle Aged, Middle Class Woman Has Something To Moan About" story.

      Hell, I think she deserves it - fuck stupid trends. There are three separate "reality" shows about cupcakes that I know of (Cupcake Wars, DC Cupcakes, The Cupcake Girls), as well as Sweet Avenger, a 12-episode series about vegans shitting on your cruelty cupcakes. Then there's Cake Boss, Ace of Cakes, and all the other generic cake-themed shows.

    35. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 2

      so basically, she made a completely moronic business decision, but the article's slant is that it is the fault of groupon? Is this woman not aware she could have set these at a price that would have been reasonable as opposed to bankrupting?

      I agree that GroupOn isn't to blame here. Almost any time a business gets involved with Groupon it's a big mistake. The alternative is to set up Groupon deals that aren't actually any cheaper than normal rates, in which cases it's the customers who lose. It's possible to find a win-win through Groupon, but it seems that in the vast majority of cases Groupon should be avoided.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    36. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by sexconker · · Score: 1

      She didn't think she'd get that level of response and cause spiraling labor costs. Prepared food has a pretty impressive margin and 75% probably wouldn't have hurt her too bad if it didn't require extra labor hours/personnel which drove the cost of making the cupcake through the roof. Just a guess though.

      I bet she's still making money anyway, or she's simply retarded.
      Anyone who was losing money (or would have lost money by hiring temps to fill orders) would have turned people away saying "Sorry, we're sold out.".
      And if they wanted to be nice, they'd offer rain checks.

    37. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by LordKronos · · Score: 5, Informative

      The fault of GroupOn is an inability to set limits in the number of coupons issued....If GroupOn allowed a limit to the number of coupons, say 2,500 then she many not have needed the extra employees and not suffered the losses from it.

      You are absolutely right....except for that fact that you are absolutely wrong. Groupon DOES allow limits. I know I've intended to buy a groupon before but waited before purchasing, and when I later came back, the deal was over BEFORE the expiration because it reached the max quantity. Don't believe me? How about from the Groupon CEO himself:

      http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/g/a/2010/09/17/businessinsider-groupon-ceo-posies-2010-9.DTL#ixzz0zp2ktgaQ

      Also, to clarify one important point: it has always been Groupon policy to allow merchants to cap deals. If a merchant sells too many Groupons, they’ll have a bad experience, the customer will have a bad experience, and therefore, Groupon loses. We’re longer-term thinkers than that. In fact, we have the opposite problem more often – where merchants protest a cap we recommend, convinced they can handle more customers than we think they can.

    38. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by sjames · · Score: 2

      Don't forget Groupon takes half, so she was selling at 12.5-percent retail.

    39. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by ColdWetDog · · Score: 5, Funny

      I owned a mall-based cookie/cafe store and also a pretzel store.

      OK, I'll bite (so to speak)

      How did you end up with the handle "TVDinner"?

      --
      Faster! Faster! Faster would be better!
    40. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Acron · · Score: 1

      As far as I'm aware, the vendor is able to cap the number of groupons offered. A popular local restaurant groupon a while back was limited to 750 (which went so fast it was too late for me by the time I noticed).

    41. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by sl4shd0rk · · Score: 1

      > 75% off is a seriously deep discount, what did she expect would happen?

      Yeah, I don't understand the logic here. Perhaps a 75% discount on a dozen is small enough to "eat" (haaaa) on a low volume but when you throw in an order for 102,000 you're expected to get orders filled immediately and operating costs skyrocket.

      --
      Join the Slashcott! Feb 10 thru Feb 17!
    42. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Acron · · Score: 1

      Most groupons I see for my area are generally around a 50% discount, not 60-80%.

    43. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So she didn't know about the lack of limits? Still sounds like the fault rests with the baker.

    44. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Fnord666 · · Score: 1

      Most baking is on a very low margin because of the bulk batches made by the Baker.

      Well, for chain stores, sure. My wife runs a bakery - specialty cake shop - and margins have to be higher because of specialized ingredients, lower volume, personalized decorating, and so forth. It tastes a lot better than the bulk-produced stuff you get at Costco or Sam's or even the grocery story, but it costs noticeably more, too.

      They're f@%&ing cupcakes for $DEITY's sake. This whole insane trend of charging $4-$5 for a cupcake is out of control anyway. Now maybe it it makes sense on the coasts I suppose, but here in the flyover states everyone knows how to make their own cupcakes by the time they are 10 years old. The sooner stores that do nothing but make cupcakes go under the better. Doubly so since it appears that the store's owners do not understand the contracts they are signing.

      Like they say though, good decisions are made through experience. Experience is gained by making bad decisions. Now they know a little bit more than they do before.

      --
      'The tyrant will always find pretext for his tyranny.' - Aesop's Fables
    45. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by whoever57 · · Score: 1

      What about Groupon's cut?

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    46. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The fault of GroupOn is an inability to set limits in the number of coupons issued. A 75% discount was probably still profit for her but that profit was erased because the quantity of coupons from GroupOn vastly exceeded her production capability so she had to hire more employees to meet the demand. That is expensive. If GroupOn allowed a limit to the number of coupons, say 2,500 then she many not have needed the extra employees and not suffered the losses from it.

      The other day I purchased something from the $1 lunch and the business who was involved limited the Groupon to 15 customers. If a limit can be set there I'm not sure why it would not be able to be set in others??

    47. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are missing the fact that she probably ended up spending more on employee overtime, outsourcing with agency staff, etc. Not to mention that you need to keep the shop open longer (utilties, etc).

    48. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by blair1q · · Score: 2, Insightful

      A limit is self-defeating. If you want one person to get a 75% discount, you might as well want everyone who gets a chance to get a 75% discount.

      Groupon's issue is that it's aggressive about marketing these overgenerous discounts to merchants. So her mistake was engendered by their suggestions. If Groupon used its statistical information wisely, they'd have guided her to a discount level that would get her a reasonable increase in business, not a flood.

      But Groupon doesn't really care if the merchant is happy. It's trying to sell stock, and what sells stock is gaudy revenues for itself.

    49. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      You know how groupon has gained it's volume? by dumping shitloads of money on salesmen who sell these deals to the shops, salesmen who don't give a fuck if it makes sense for anyone involved, it doesn't even make sense for groupon(they're losing money!!). but volume == bubble == _investor_ money , right?

      so there should have been a limit and the groupon guy should have told the shopkeeper to add a limit.

      groupon is ridiculously priced company for doing so BAD BUSINESS..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    50. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Mister_Stoopid · · Score: 1

      they seem to be getting enough business to support multiple of this type of store in the same area.

      The fact that they exist does not imply that they have sufficient business. If you're the type of person who opens a brick & mortar business based on a product that is clearly nothing more than a passing fad, are you really doing the market research beforehand to guarantee that your market is large enough? Probably not.

    51. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      They only did it because Barbra Streisand campaigned against it.

    52. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by blair1q · · Score: 2

      On the other hand, they have thousands of people who will likely come back and average-up that margin, and they're now world-famous.

      Best $40k that lady ever spent on her business, I'm guessing.

    53. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Rary · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well yes, he claims that it has always been Groupon's policy. Of course, that was stated in response to a particular case in which the business owner claimed that Groupon refused to allow a cap on the number of groupons sold.

      We can't be sure what deals and limitations the various groupon salespeople actually present to retailers, but it's completely naive to think that Groupon is completely blameless in cases like this simply because the CEO issued a sympathetic press release.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    54. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      No, a limit is not self defeating.

      If you can only make a profit selling 2000 cupcakes, then you make sure the coupon has a limited issue that would end up at or around 2000 cupcakes. This isn't fucking hard to do. Guess what? This makes this more *exclusive* and increases the value of the offer. Ever heard of "offer for a limited time!"? If someone says "I'd like the deal they have" it is up to the business on the "how to deal with that". That is *NOT* the fault of groupon.

      Groupon is not the merchant, why should they care if the merchant is happy or not? They are selling what they promised to sell. Groupon has done absolutely nothing wrong here, and the business blaming groupon shows you who really made the mistake: the business. In short, don't offer what you can't provide. How dare groupon offer a business something, and the business take them up on the offer! that is the message you're sending.

      A little bit of basic math on profits vs if groupon people take the coupon would have easily shown what is and isn't profitable, and then the business could have decided a: whether to do business with groupon and b: whether or not it's profitable.

    55. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Politburo · · Score: 1

      Box cake mix and a jar of frosting was how I was taught to make cupcakes when I was 10. That is not what these places sell.

      These days, I make my own cakes and frosting from scratch. But I still buy from the bakery, because it's better and more varied than what I can do, and sometimes you're just lazy and want the product without all the work. Lastly, you can buy just one instead of making a dozen (which can easily lead to overeating).

    56. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      There is still an insanely low margin on baking using 'fancy' ingredients.

      I suspect we are talking at cross purposes. There's marginal cost (how much it costs to make "N+1" units vs. just "N" units) and then there's profit margin (how much you charge for the unit vs. how much it cost to make).

      In terms of ingredient costs, sure, baking eleven cakes doesn't cost a whole lot more than making ten cakes. But if you're hand-decorating each cake to finish them - especially if they are unique orders, as was the case in the linked article, where people could order which cake and frosting - the marginal labor costs are a lot harder to get around. If you get into overtime, adding that 'one extra cake' costs quite a bit more, for example. And once you hit the limit of what'll fit into the oven at one time (say, X), you have a discontinuous jump in what the "X+1" will cost in terms of time and effort.

      The profit margin needs to be quite a bit higher than the marginal cost of ingredients, because of the labor. Even in a busy grocery store that does baking in bulk, the cake mixes (ingredients) cost a whole lot less than the finished cakes (after the labor).

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    57. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Austerity+Empowers · · Score: 1

      Welcome to 2010, businesses use groupon to drive customers in with discounts, and suddenly are surprised when customers show up. Groupon goes away, so do the customers (at least most of them, depending on how good your product was compared to competition), and businesses whine again that the money machine doesn't work.

    58. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Coupons are marketing costs that get new customers in the door to try your wares?

      What kind of absurd business logic is this?

    59. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1

      This whole insane trend of charging $4-$5 for a cupcake is out of control anyway.

      I happen to agree - it's basically a fad. Of course, cupcakes aren't a major part of my wife's business. :)

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    60. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't tell someone you're "sold out" when you already sold them the cupcakes. If you can't make that many cupcakes, you shouldn't sell that many. Unfortunately she failed to set a limit on how many of her cupcakes Groupon was allowed to sell.

    61. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by blair1q · · Score: 2

      You either don't know how math works, or don't know how sales works.

      She could have set a lower discount, still set no limit, got fewer takers, but got a better class of takers (those who were interested not just because of the size of the discount).

      She would then (a) profit from every cupcake sold even though she was offering a discount and (b) profit even more from repeat business.

      Groupon should care about anyone who they serve, whether it's the merchant or the consumer. But they don't. They only care about shovelling in numbers so they can bedazzle Wall Street.

    62. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      You can also (at least around these parts) set a limit for groupons so that only X may be bought.

      She's either very smart and has got not only tons of grouponers but also blogs from around the world to advertise for her on only ~$40,000, or very very dumb.

    63. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you never heard of a "t.v. dinner?"

      Aluminum trays filled with a full meal: Meat, starch, vegetabls & a dessert. The concept was a tray dinner that you could eat in front of the television with the rest of your family. Swanson's Hungry Man dinners are "t.v. dinners."

    64. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by larry+bagina · · Score: 1

      Groupon takes 50% of that 6.5#. Her take was only 3.25#/dozen.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    65. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by cayenne8 · · Score: 1

      If you're the type of person who opens a brick & mortar business based on a product that is clearly nothing more than a passing fad, are you really doing the market research beforehand to guarantee that your market is large enough? Probably not.

      Well, that's the thing. You get in early on the fad....open shop, sell a good bit, and sell it off before the fad ends, and move on to the next business start!!

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    66. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so basically, she made a completely moronic business decision

      Moreover, then she stuck with it. If I'd suddenly need 102000 cupcakes because of a poor decision, the first thing I'd is contact a full blown cupcake factory to help me out, rather than try to bake all of them myself. She might have to needed to spend a week negotiating price and quality requirements, but it might have turned into a beneficial deal. Then again maybe she did. As her shop is nearby, I'm tempted to drop by and ask.

    67. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by DaveGod · · Score: 2

      The costing quote isn't very useful as it doesn't make clear what they're counting or whether it's incremental.

      Also, in the UK - and particularly for boutique shops - rent and other overheads can be a substantial proportion of costs. This results in a situation where scale makes things interesting. I can explain the situation faced by our shopkeeper and also why the figures do not appear to add up, but I only know how with an illustration. So, say:

      normal sale price £26
      average ingredients £7
      average worker per batch £8 (remember these are boutique, the whole point is the time spent with the icing)
      contribution to overheads and profit per unit = £11 (appears to be 42% gross margin)

      rent say £24k pa
      admin & other overheads say £50k pa
      therefore break-even point at (24k+50k)/11= 6,727 dozens.

      Now at normal capacity 10,000 dozens, a reasonable £36,003 profit is made.

      So what happens if you have a Groupon code, whereby maybe 2,000 extra cupcakes are sold at £6.50? I assume that existing customers don't notice the discount so normal sales are unaffected, quite plausable for a boutique shop. OK so overheads are fixed and already paid for right, so there's a loss of £11-£6.50=£4.50, * 2,000 = £9,000, right?

      Nope. Really production wages are semi-fixed. Staff have contracted minimum hours and are only willing to do so much OT, there's a limit to how long cupcakes will store for, you always need to cover for sick time... In a big corporation this comes out through scale, in a small boutique shop it doesn't. So actually there's extra capacity to cover your 2,000 and the loss is actually £7-£6.50 = 50p, * 2,000 = £1,000. Maybe you need one or two extra shifts but a £2,000 loss is worst-case and still a bargain for the advertisement: you'll make that back plus some profit if 10% of them come back ONCE at full price.

      And if those 10% of them actually come back ~3 times per year each, you can probably hang onto using up much of that excess capacity so you should be looking at £26-£7 * 200 units *3 = £11,400 per year. Nice.

      But what happens when 8,500 new orders come in? All your excess capacity is burned by the first 2,000 units. The next 6,500 have the full 7+8=£15 cost per batch! Now you're losing ((15-6.50) * 6,500) + that £2,000 = £57,250. Actually it's probably worse than that because you're having to find temp labour fast, so they'll cost more, and frankly they won't be half as good as your regular staff, taking longer, more wastage...

      Of course if 10% of those guys come back once you're laughing, but it's less likely. Those temp workers really couldn't do what makes your boutique shop special. Such a big influx is much more likely to be cannibalising sales too. It's also more likely to be coming from wider afield - people less often travelling nearby to buy from you, or who already shop at a local competitor.

      This shop owner may well have made smart, well informed decisions all the way but for one critical one. I think we should forgive her that too, our hindsight is 20-20 but in her day-to-day an extra 8,500 orders would seem ridiculous.

    68. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only problem with that approach is that you are paying to advertise Groupon's brand, not your own.

    69. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Algae_94 · · Score: 1

      The cupcake bakery made a bad business decision with this Groupon and it bit them in the ass. Groupon is not to blame for this, but it is a tarnish to whatever reputation Groupon currently has. If Groupon wants to have a successful business with good relationships with the stores they work with, Groupon needs to analyze all this data from previous Groupons, talk to stores about their experiences, and give much better guidance to their clients to get good deals that don't cause a big loss or negative customer experiences.

    70. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by TVDinner · · Score: 1

      I'm old enough to have eaten said item below, but it's from a ZZ Top song. "I like the enchiladas and the teriyaki too; I'll even like the chicken if the sauce is not too blue"

    71. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make too much sense either though.

      First of all, the 100k cupcakes aren't going to be turned in all at the same time. Granted, it might be a little busier for the first month or so, but most of these programs will have an expiry date far into the future. She may have to make more per day, but probably not absurdly more.

      Also, if she was making enough profit at a 75% discount to cover her existing staff, then adding one or two more people (even at razor thin profits per unit), she shouldn't be losing THAT much for a few temp workers.

      I smell gross financial mismanagement here.

    72. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The profit margin needs to be quite a bit higher than the marginal cost of ingredients, because of the labor. Even in a busy grocery store that does baking in bulk, the cake mixes (ingredients) cost a whole lot less than the finished cakes (after the labor).

      Profit margin is always after costs of all inputs (including labor) have been accounted for.

    73. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by poetmatt · · Score: 1

      What groupon *should do*, is up to them, not anyone else.

      If they do a bad job, the market will deal with it by people choosing other offers, as appropriate. As a result, a lot of other sites offer what groupon does now: youswoop, livingsocial, etc.

      I do know math, but you don't know business. All you think is what groupon "should" do. Business deals are not the same as consumer deals. Business deals are *NOT* about some kind of a relationship unless it's written in a contract. Obviously Groupon followed their contract, or they'd be sued for this.

    74. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Groupon doesn't pre-sell the items online, they only are giving out the opportunity for a discount. She could have refused the sales at the door, but she decided not to until they had 8500 orders, not wanting to take a PR hit and getting a bad name for "running out". Two bad decisions, one to take the Groupon deal without setting a practical limit to start with, and another to not put the brakes on an out-of-control situation sooner.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    75. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Hopefully this woman learned something very important about promotions: never offer any promotions that leave you with a negative profit margin. Promotions should never be more than enough to cause you to break-even, if that. There's a reason you see retail stores offering promotions all the time for 10, 20, sometimes 30% off, and still doing well business-wise: their normal prices have very high profit margins, so even when they drop the price 30% for a promotion they're still coming out ahead. The only time you should ever take a negative profit margin on a sale is when you're getting rid of stuff on clearance/closeout, because getting 10 or 20% of the regular price is still better than throwing it in the trash and getting nothing at all, and you need to clear out the space to make room for higher-margin stuff.

    76. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree that GroupOn isn't to blame here. Almost any time a business gets involved with Groupon it's a big mistake.

      If GroupOn's business model is screwing businesses, I'd say they deserve some blame.

    77. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Since you say you used to own a mall-based food store, maybe you can answer the following question for me. I'll understand if you have no idea, but since you'd know something about mall rents, maybe you'll have a clue:

      How the hell does Radio Shack stay open? I never see any customers inside those stores!

    78. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by cmburns69 · · Score: 1

      Groupon should care about the merchant because a happy merchant will work with Groupon again; An unhappy merchant will not.

      --
      Online Starcraft RPG? At
      Dietary fiber is like asynchronous IO-- Non-blocking!
    79. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Nowhere in TFA does it actually say she lost 20k ... so it costs her a little over £9 to make a dozen cupcakes ... Though I also don't really understand who the hell pays £26 for a dozen cupcakes.

      Yeah, and what kind of cupcake costs 75p to make? I suspect that 75p includes all overhead for the building, labor, accountancy firm, janitor, annual contribution to the neighborhood business association, and payments on the owner's leased Mercedes, which she only uses for business purposes, of course.

      If they had a batch order for 100,000 units, I bet costs per unit dropped considerably.

    80. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      You average corner bakery that bakes the same day from fresh ingredients will still cost less than these specialty cupcake stores.

    81. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by rk · · Score: 1

      That's not really true in the case of loss leaders. Stores sell stuff at a loss all the time, especially grocery stores with perishables, because you can't really stock up on things like milk, eggs or produce. The objective is to get your butt in the door to buy that 1.59 gallon of milk that cost them 1.92 that they usually sell for 2.59. But maybe then you'll buy that 5.99 box of bakery "gourmet" cookies right near the dairy case that cost them 1.64 to make, in addition to all your groceries because you don't want to go to 4 different stores to buy food, do you?

    82. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Sprouticus · · Score: 1

      As for Groupon...Groupon costs a lot in food costs, and 2 years later I hadn't seen any significant change in sales that could've been attributed to their involvement.

      If you have not seen any return, perhaps your products did not warrant it. I can say for myself and my friend (small sample, but IMO itelling) that we ALWAYS treat groupons as a way to check out a new product and decide if we like it. I was just at a little Italian place this weekend and used a gorupon. I would NEVER have gone there (in the corner of a strip mall) without it. The food was amazing. I will be going back. Conversely, I have been to places, purchased services and was unimpressed. I will not be going back to those establishments.

      Im sure that there are those that use Groupon as a one time sheap dinner/ride/event/etc, but I would guess that a good % of groupon users are folks like me.

      So if you dont get a return on your investment, maybe the cause is looking you right in the mirror.

    83. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So there's a market, and business case, for an automated "just in time" baking system that eliminates waste by baking on demand?

      (A serious question)

    84. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's a little different with perishables, but even there they aren't selling them at a loss, at least not when they're fresh. The fresh ones have a healthy profit; after they're not fresh they drop the price a lot so they can at least recoup most of their money before the thing is so stale they have to pitch it. As you said, the normal price of the milk is 2.59, not 1.59, and they try to sell most of it when it's at 2.59.

      Using loss leaders is risky, and usually only done for certain situations where it makes sense. Grocery stores can afford to do a certain amount of that, because people shop there so much anyway for their regular groceries, and most of them don't bother to go to 6 different stores just to save a few cents here and there, so offering a few cheap products at a loss (esp. if they're nearly expired anyway) can work out well there. Video game consoles can afford to do it because they make so much more on the games rather than the console itself. But making your primary product a loss-leader is not a smart move, and that's exactly what this bakery did. People don't go to bakeries to buy $150 worth of groceries for the next 2-4 weeks, they only buy a few treats. And apparently this business's main item was cupcakes, which is what they offered to customers at a loss. Not smart. How long would Starbucks stay in business if they started offering all their drinks at a loss? (Why anyone would buy Starbucks drinks is beyond me, but you get the point)

    85. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by The+Pirou · · Score: 1

      I suspect we are talking at cross purposes.

      Probably.

      I was addressing the actual cost per unit (to include labor and materials) as ~1/20th of the cost paid by the consumer.
      Occasionally particular items require more effort or require a higher cost because of specific ingredients, but most bakers with business longevity don't have that cost associated with EVERY item.

      Most of the orders aren't unique as such, but rather chosen from a limited selection. Some of the cupcake styles will of course require more effort than others, but many of her offerings are simple designs that use cookie-cuttered fondant or edible pastry print, and all of the cupcakes are presumably using one of several base cupcakes. Cross utilization is always king in this type of operation.

      Filling the oven is less of an issue because the bulk of the labor is going to be the actual decoration of the cupcakes. It would only take one unskilled laborer that can read and follow directions(though that can be asking a lot these days) to keep everyone on staff but the dishwasher rolling in cupcakes.
      Secondly, it is unlikely that 8500 people went to a cupcake store that they probably didn't know much about that same week, much less that month. Business was swamped by comparison to her normal routine I'm sure, but Groupon is a tricky devil that is still kicking you long after the initial rush.

      I like to use the deals on Groupon, but I hate what it does to my food costs when it's used on me.
      One of the last deals we had with them was a $25 coupon for the cost of $15. We then paid Groupon $5 for each of those coupons they sold. Sadly customers didn't use it all on baked goods...

    86. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Funny, crutchfield did that to me in 1998 when I purchased 10 of their FREE subwoofers on their website ;)
      (actually, it was just flatout denial over the telephone as they called me a couple hours later)

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    87. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by adolf · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hmm.

      I think it was me that was keeping Radio Shack alive. I, until very recently, used to buy 1:1 audio isolation transformers exclusively from Radio Shack. They were about $4, which is very reasonable for quantities of 1, and were of consistent quality for decades. (They get used for projects at work, so I try to keep a few around.)

      Why have I stopped buying them there? Because approximately 1 month ago, they stopped carrying that part and do not list a replacement.

      I have subsequently noticed that the Radio Shack in the mall has closed. Coincidence?

    88. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another brilliant example of 'most people are stupid'. I mean as the previous poster said: what was she thinking (probably not much).

      My respect for fulfilling that order however.

    89. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nowhere in TFA does it actually say she lost $20k, and in fact the article is from The Telegraph and the business is based in London, so all currency in TFA is in pounds. In fact it says she lost between £2.50 and £3 per batch, which means she lost between £21,250 and £25,500, which would mean she lost close to $40k.

      no, the it says $20k, not £20k. I believe he mistook the $$$ for £££.

      he should have taken the time to stop and think, perhaps at least check the copy and paste

    90. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by chrismcb · · Score: 1

      While I agree that she made a bad decision, I mean what was she thinking to offer such a discount? I would also imagine that Groupon advised her on what sort of deal to offer. They claim they tailor the deals. She also claim she only expected a few hundred. Which I imaging Groupon convinced her of what would happen. She decided she could lose 1000lbs for the advertising benefit. But not 10 or 20 times that.

    91. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by drsmithy · · Score: 1

      Though I also don't really understand who the hell pays £26 for a dozen cupcakes.

      ITT: Americans discovering how expensive the rest of the world is.

    92. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's not at least indirectly blaming Groupon, then how did the story get into the news in the first place?

    93. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about 75% off to the first 100 people?

    94. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Zebai · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't say that's always true. Its true that she should not have offered this coupon at a below cost discount but not because its a bad idea it was just a bad idea for her and for several reasons.

      The most important being this was an untested, unknown advertising venue for her, when you advertise in a new market or with a new medium you don't go into blindly with an offer you cannot sustain. The company i work has well established return rates on various types of advertisements and they set the amount of the discount so that the amount of return that effort traditionally gives doesn't hurt our margin. If we went into groupon, a medium we've never tested before we would do so without the benefit of all our marketing research data and so our discount would not be as good as our more targeted advertising the amount of the discount would be such that should we had an overwhelming response we could maintain it without loss. Once we established a history with them and know the amount of offer takers that venue traditionally receives then we would adjust our promotion offer to suit it better.

    95. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While groupon does allow limits and most deals have one, it is true that the sales person might not have advised them about setting proper limits. It should be considered also that according to the literature and groupon itself most of the merchants who ran a deal would run a groupon deal again. Several thousands of deals are run every day by groupon and there is no much publicity about the successful cases.

    96. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      Listen, it's Slashdot, an American website. Be thankful we even recognized that this was taking place in a different country.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    97. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by thegarbz · · Score: 1

      so basically, she made a completely moronic business decision, but the article's slant is that it is the fault of groupon? Is this woman not aware she could have set these at a price that would have been reasonable as opposed to bankrupting?

      While I fully agree, Groupon is at least partially to blame here due to the way their sales force actually works. Groupon take a cut based on a sales of the discounted product. The incentive is for sales people to NOT recommend capped Groupon deals. This would seem to be completely moronic if it weren't for the fact that it is not an isolated case. Groupon are best placed to advise how their product works and it is beginning to be quite evident that they are not doing so with the customer's best interests at heart.

      Perhaps the most telling statistic is that 50% of Groupon's customers would not use Groupon again. When any company gets dissatisfaction numbers quite that high then something is seriously foul with a company's product or service.

    98. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The Groupon sales people probably sold her on the idea that it would help to drum up business, conveniently forgetting to tell her that Groupon has become a notorious hotspot for professional freeloaders and exploiters, who have no damned intention of becoming repeat customers once they've gotten their freebies.

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    99. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by elrous0 · · Score: 1

      The REALLY weird thing is that all the unique stuff that Radio Shack carries that occasionally forces me to go there (audio adapters, electronic components, etc) is the very stuff they have moved more and more AWAY from in the last decade or so. The unique stuff keeps losing shelf space and the crappy stuff that everyone has (cellphones, cheap stereos, etc.) gets MORE space. It's like they're a company that's determined not to make money. Maybe the whole company is just some tax dodge or something (like a Uwe Boll movie), some write-off for investors who actually want it to lose tons of money.

      Seriously, has ANYONE ever bought a modern cellphone from Radio Shack? Cellphones take up over half their floor space now and I've never met anyone who has bought a cellphone there (not since they sold the old bricks back in the 80's anyway).

      --
      SJW: Someone who has run out of real oppression, and has to fake it.
    100. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by cthulhu11 · · Score: 1

      But when you used it, you limited the offers to be sold to a number you could handle, right? Failing to do so would seem to be the fault of the article's subject. From what I've seen, every groupon deal is limited in this way, or at least can be by client businesses with at least a fragment of a clue.

    101. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If she's not at least indirectly blaming Groupon, then how did the story get into the news in the first place?

      Maybe its because a business owner actually acknowledged her own failings rather than blaming/suing everyone else?

    102. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Surt · · Score: 1

      Redundant? Check the post order metamods.

      --
      "Who is the Journal of Quantum Physics going to believe?" --Stephen Hawking
    103. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by The+Pirou · · Score: 1

      As it happens, the place I was referencing for that particular statement has had more than a few accolades. Whether people like her or respect her opinion, Rachael Ray named us in the top 8 pizzerias in the US. I ran the kitchen there for over 2.5 years; Purchasing, production, and everything else that wasn't mixing a drink up at the front bar eventually fell into my lap. Groupon wasn't a major factor in anything.

      The owner is a big fan of analytics, having set the Guiness record for solving the rubik's cube at the age of 14, writing a book on it at 16, graduating from Yale to spend years as a programmer before going into Pizza and doing lectures on mastery & analytics for Google and other companies. He tracked more fiscal minutiae and marketing variables than I've ever seen on the back end of the business. Did I mention Groupon wasn't a major factor? It wasn't a factor.

    104. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by The+Pirou · · Score: 1

      Whoops, forgot the www in my code. Sorry 'bout that.

    105. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If Groupon are claiming to offer a tailored individual approach, then they fucking well should have tailored the deal for a small shop so it had a limit. But that isn't in their interests, they don't give a fuck about the businesses, they just want their cut and the more deals sold the more they get.

      That said, she should have been more careful when setting up the Groupon deal.

    106. Re:The Law of Unintended Consequences... by wvmarle · · Score: 1

      Many Groupons I doubt whether the price is really such a discount.

      I have had a pretty nice set dinner some time ago, a Groupon, claiming to be 70% off ($350 (USD45) instead of $1050 or so). What an offer! Or was it? The dinner was good, that notwithstanding, the restaurant was serving Groupon only, and with a choice of just three sets they could save a lot on their food and handling costs. Considering the quality of the meal and the location of the restaurant, what we paid was a good price, but definitely not cheap. Absolutely not worth the original price, they'd never be able to compete on that.

      Then my wife came with an offer: a laptop, 30% off! Top deal! Or is it? In that case in seconds I found the exact same laptop model in other on-line shops at almost the same price. Barely any discount for the groupon sale. The "original price" was obviously fake.

      So many more of the same I see on Groupon: the discounts are just too big to be economical. Giving a try-out discount is one thing; losing out on the deal is another. Restaurants and so will at least want to have their cost covered; other goods have a purchase price and a reseller wants to have at least their purchase cost back.

      In previous stories here on /. it was mentioned that Groupon takes a 50% cut on the deal - this I also start to doubt more and more. I don't know how much they take, but laptops are low-margin products so it can't be that much, or the reseller would be taking a huge loss.

      Back to the cakes in question: no doubt the margin is lower than on their normal sales, but if the bakery's manager is not totally stupid they have at least their cost covered on it, possible a small margin, and with the current economy of scale that he's (unintentionally) achieving he may be able to make them a bit cheaper even.

  2. And the moral of today's story is... by RogueyWon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... be careful about the special offers you advertise online. Groupon isn't at fault here - if anything, the complaint is that it did its job too well. If you put a sign in your window offering a special offer, you can take it down whenever you want. If you stick something out on the net, you need to be very sure that you can handle a bit of scaling around the response.

    Still, full credit to the bakery for actually meeting the orders. I suspect lots of far larger retailers would have tried to weasel out of the deal they'd offered in a situation like that. And so far as I can see from TFA, nobody is talking about lawsuits.

    1. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by marcosdumay · · Score: 1

      There is some fault at Gropoun, they should have a way to limit the number of offers (unless they have, then the fault is doubly with the retailer).

      But I bet that maker will get something in return for that sale, she's getting a lot of publicity.

    2. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by marcosdumay · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just replying to myself... Groupon does set that limit, and the fault is doubly with the retailer.

    3. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by sribe · · Score: 1

      There is some fault at Gropoun, they should have a way to limit the number of offers (unless they have, then the fault is doubly with the retailer).

      Groupon absolutely does allow limits on offers. I know, because once or twice I've responded to an offer and the web page said "sold out".

    4. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      Other sellers have reported that the Groupon salespeople do their very best to convince companies not to put any cap at all on the amount of product available, downplaying the probability of just something like this.

      This is hence similar to a lender trying to get someone to maximise their borrowing. You could argue that the bakery as a company is a professional business and has no excuse - on the other hand you don't expect bakeries to be masters of internet marketing either. It would make you legally correct and a jerk.

    5. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      ...I suspect lots of far larger retailers would have tried to weasel out of the deal they'd offered in a situation like that...

      AT&T had their online coupon for a free usb wifi card. So many people ordered it that they cancelled orders and didn't give it to many people. Props to Rachel Brown for holding a more respectable offer than AT&T could. :)

    6. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by canajin56 · · Score: 2

      They do. You can limit them to X total coupons sold. You can also make them "one per customer" although customers will get violent if you try to enforce that just because it says so on the coupon.

      --
      ASCII stupid question, get a stupid ANSI
    7. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by angel'o'sphere · · Score: 1

      Did you ever try to put up your own deal with groupon? It has a super shitty user interface. That mistake could have happend to everyone ... and groupon is the only one making money on such mistakes.

      --
      Cost free eBook I read (by iBook/Kobo/Amazon/ObookO/Gutenberg etc.): "The Green Odyssey" by Philip Jose Farmer.
    8. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by AngryDeuce · · Score: 1

      Well, when you're not a multinational conglomerate you don't have the luxury of pissing off tens of thousands of people like they can.

      Hell, they don't even have to worry about Class Action Lawsuits anymore. They might as well change their motto to "Take it or leave it, we really don't give a shit either way, we'll win in the end (TM)"

    9. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fault can't be assigned so simply. What is Groupon's business? Who are its customers?

      I believe that Groupon's business is advertising, and its customers are the businesses who sell the discounted offers. Groupon should be interested in helping these businesses advertise effectively. Any intelligent salesperson could have asked the question "How many of these offers are you capable of fulfilling?" and weighed the number of available coupons against this. This would allow for exposure for the business, discounts for Groupon buyers, and of course a cut for Groupon itself. Everyone wins. Everyone is happy.

      A savvy business owner would have realized this without advice from Groupon, and the fact that this woman didn't implies that her business was destined to fail eventually anyway. But that does not change the way this story reveals Groupon's motivation: Groupon's primary motivation is not helping its customers, it is taking as much money from them as possible. Any business not organized around serving its customers will shortly find itself without any.

    10. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is England though, the worst we have is drive by arguments...

    11. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's similar to the housing collapse: the right wing blames it all on borrowers taking out loans they couldn't pay. Be that as it may, what does it say about a bank that makes it a *policy* to lend out to as many people who can't pay as possible?

    12. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by slazzy · · Score: 1

      Groupon could also have a way to stagger the date that you can redeem the certificates for example for every 10 they sell, the first date it can be used on goes forward one day. Probably by the time it got to a month people would stop ordering, but at least they would have the option to still buy and wait a month for their cheap cupcakes...

      --
      Website Just Down For Me? Find out
    13. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      You can also make them "one per customer" although customers will get violent if you try to enforce that just because it says so on the coupon.
      The same can be said about any coupon for any store that says one per customer. People will ALWAYS try to weasel their way into using more than one, or using the coupon for other products, or somehow 'adjusting' it to fit what they actually want.

      My personal theory is... if I ever owned a store, I'd kick them out for trying to scam me. You try to cheat me when I make an offer of good will by way of putting out coupons, then I do not want your money. Get the hell out of my store, I will not sell to people trying to steal from me.

      Unfortunately, various people with marketing degrees tell me that this isn't an economically viable way to do things. Apparently nowadays, you have to accept thieves into your store with open arms.

      Thus why I never plan to open a business. Everything's too broken nowadays.

    14. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by planimal · · Score: 0

      then how come i can't have real glass in a bar?

    15. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      "You can also make them "one per customer" although customers will get violent if you try to enforce that just because it says so on the coupon."

      Then you simply smile and say "bring it" as you reach for a tazer.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    16. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought they did set a limit. There were offers I saw in my email that were limited.

    17. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not around for the first run of "We don't care, we're the phone company", eh?

    18. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by mr1911 · · Score: 1

      "Whoosh" + mod points = -1 score.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    19. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

      To be fair, Groupon's sales people try to pressure the businesses into allowing unlimited sales, and will try to negotiate a higher percentage of the revenue going to them if you limit it too much. They aren't happy about it, but in my experience, they will agree to set limits to the purchase amounts as long as you are going to be selling $20k of product.

    20. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Rary · · Score: 1

      Groupon does set that limit, and the fault is doubly with the retailer.

      Not necessarily. Groupon is in the business of selling these deals to retailers. A Groupon representative says in the article that they approach each retailer with a deal tailored for them based on past experiences with similar clients. It is at least possible that Groupon approached Mrs. Brown with an offer that they believed (or at least told her that they believed) would result in a few hundred purchases, and she bought it.

      Sure, it's buyer beware and all that, but it's possible that Groupon is doing a poor job, intentionally or otherwise, of setting accurate expectations for retailers.

      --

      "You cannot simultaneously prevent and prepare for war." -- Albert Einstein

    21. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by dcw3 · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, various people with marketing degrees tell me that this isn't an economically viable way to do things. Apparently nowadays, you have to accept thieves into your store with open arms.

      Why are you asking the thieves? While I'm stereotyping here, so much of marketing today is about getting people to buy stuff that they have no reason to purchase. Every commercial seems to either use sex, or tug at heart-strings to tell you how it's going to save the children/environment/whales/grandma/handicapped. I tease my MBA spouse about it all the time.

      --
      Just another day in Paradise
    22. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by ravenshrike · · Score: 1

      That Fannie and Freddie encouraged Countrywide to start the ball rolling with those standards, and thus everyone else followed suit.

    23. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by blair1q · · Score: 1

      If it says "one per customer" and someone tries to use a second, that's not accepting an offer, it's theft.

      I'd not only refuse to give them a second item, I'd take back the first and call the cops.

      And if they get violent, well, you ever seen the equipment they use in a professional bakery? Would be a shame if someone accidentally fell into that dough mixer. Y'know?

    24. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by sootman · · Score: 1

      > Other sellers have reported that the Groupon salespeople do
      > their very best to convince companies not to put any cap at
      > all on the amount of product available, downplaying the
      > probability of just something like this.

      It is very, very important to remember that a salesman's interests are the exact opposite of yours. You want to keep as much of your own money as possible, and they want to take as much of your money as possible. On the one hand, you both want the same thing: for you to give them some money in exchange for something you want. And yeah, in theory, they want you to be happy, buy again, and tell your friends. But on the other, much bigger hand, they just want your money, period. When you're having a moment of doubt as to whether the salesman really wants to help you or not, remember the big hand.

      Also remember: until you hand over the money, you have ALL the power in the transaction. If you're feeling overwhelmed or worried or anxious, take a breath and wait. You can ALWAYS say "no" and walk away. If they start saying things like "You can save 10% but only if you sign today", WALK AWAY. Do you REALLY think they're going to turn away your business tomorrow? They will ABSOLUTELY offer you the same deal in a day or a week or a month if it means they get the sale. And the flip side of that is this: once you hand over your money, you have no power at all. If anything goes wrong, you are probably fucked. Yes, in theory you could sue, but that is usually not practical, especially in the realm of a few hundred to a few thousand dollars.

      --
      Dear Slashdot: next time you want to mess with the site, add a rich-text editor for comments.
    25. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by R3d+M3rcury · · Score: 1

      You could argue that the bakery as a company is a professional business and has no excuse - on the other hand you don't expect bakeries to be masters of internet marketing either. It would make you legally correct and a jerk.

      No, I don't expect bakeries to be masters of Internet marketing. However, I am in control of my business. If I don't understand something, I either read up on it or I don't do it.

      I don't buy the whole, "It's not my fault that someone took advantage of me!" attitude. Yes, Groupon uses high-pressure sales tactics. If you don't like it, walk away. If the deal doesn't seem good, don't take it. Make sure you're covered. If the salesperson doesn't like that, TFB.

    26. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Saw some of those "Extreme Couponer" shows and these people roll their carts up and tell the clerks that they're going to separate things into multiple orders in order to get around coupon limits. I'm not sure why the stores put up with it.

      Sorry, have a nice day, but I've got real customers to deal with

    27. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The emotional justification is simple and easy to understand: You're willing to sell one at a special price but not two? So the couple there gets to buy two at a discount but I have to pay full price for the second because my better half is at the store across the street? If I notice that I pay more than someone else for the same product, then I feel cheated. If I feel cheated, I am willing to cheat you.

      That's why you grant everybody the discounted price, as often as they want until you end the promotion, even if they forgot to bring the coupon (put a batch of coupons next to the product). That also means you never sell coupons, and you always reserve the right to end the promotion at any time unless you still make a healthy profit at the discounted price.

      The feeling cheated aspect is of particular importance when you look at "new customer discounts", especially in the fields of telecommunications and online services: The fact that you can't stay with a company without paying significantly more than someone who is as disloyal as possible means that only companies with exceptional products or services can hold on to customers. Everybody else always has to keep paying everybody to "come back" from a different service provider, and then lock them into long contracts. The companies are in this mess precisely because they couldn't resist the cheap marketing. Paying someone to switch to you gets you the equivalent of mercenaries, who will just as easily be bought away from you. If you treat your loyal customers worse than new customers, you get what you pay for.

    28. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Tom · · Score: 1

      Other sellers have reported that the Groupon salespeople do their very best to convince companies not to put any cap at all on the amount of product available, downplaying the probability of just something like this.

      Wouldn't one minute of using your brain tell you that just to be sure, you should set some ridiculously high cap? Say, if you plan to sell 100 units, and in your wildest dreams fantasize about 500, set a limit at 2000 or so?

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    29. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by fat+bastard+of+doom · · Score: 1

      Actually, I used to be the General Manager for an extremely high volume Hardee's. One of those nice 24 hour jobs off of a major interstate. We had the problem with people trying to fuck us over with coupons and getting aggressive about it. For example, we had shit like people trying to combine a BOGO Thickburger coupon with a $1.99 Thickburger coupon, and then with a free fries with purchase of Thickburger coupon, and then trying to use a free drink coupon. NO! NO! Fuck you very much. Not happening. Period. You do not get two big bags of food for two bucks.

      They would try to bully their way with the coupons with my crew and my management staff. I started throwing them out on their asses, and sometimes not in a pleasant way, depending on how pissy they were getting. Coupons plainly state the limits on them and that they can not be combined with any other offer. This includes combo pricing, assholes. The other thing that they would try is to keep the coupons. Sorry. No coupon, no discount. Fuck you very much for coming in. Expired coupon? No. Fuck you!

      You know what the funny thing was? This didn't affect my customer count and sales. Most people trying to screw businesses over with coupons and discounts are not regular customers. You will not see them unless they can get something free or highly discounted.

      Thank these Extreme Couponers for this shit. Fuck them.

    30. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Groupon fucks you over if you choose to use the limit. Basically, you either have no-limit and get lots of promotion (exposing you to this exact scenario and making Groupon tons of money), or you set a limit and Groupon says "nahh you're clearly not serious, we're not going to advertise you at all. Also while you're at it, make it a 75% discount instead of a 50% so we can buy up a bunch of coupons to fuck you even harder."

      Groupon is bad for businesses and will drive a lot of otherwise sustainable operations out of business.

    31. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by fat+bastard+of+doom · · Score: 1

      No, you don't grant as many discounts as the customers want. You certainly do not offer the discount to anyone who walks in the door, whether they have the coupon or not. Offering the discount without the coupon should be used as a last resort, and at the discretion of a manager or owner, in order to keep a repeat customer.

      There is generally a set amount of profit that a company is either willing or able to leave on the table when designing a discount campaign. With coupons, for example, a company will generally set a certain number of discounts. This is because the executives, owners, or whoever makes the decisions, has decided that there is a specific number of discounts that can be given out before the cost of the promotion gets out of hand. Though you may not think so, in many cases coupon discounts bring an item close to cost.

      In my earlier example, that $1.99 hamburger coupon actually cost me about $1.85 to make. This accounts for its proper share of costs, including food cost, labor, utilities, insurance, advertising, and so forth. The only thing that figure does not include is the taxes. Retail can be similar, depending on the item being sold. Something with an MSRP of $50.00 may have a wholesale cost of $15.00. That may sound like a lot of profit, but overhead and other costs can quickly send the actual cost well upwards of $30.00. Giving everyone that walks in the door that 30% off coupon doesn't sound so pleasant now, does it?

      I am not trying to be an asshole, nor am I trying to personally attack anyone. Unfortunately, you probably either 1.) have never been in a high enough level management position to understand certain aspects of business and/or 2.) have never taken bachelor's or masters level business administration courses, in particular, cost accounting, supply chain management, and applicable marketing courses. I have. I left my restaurant to finish my MBA. I have held several senior management positions in my life, and dealing with these issues was my bread and butter for years.

    32. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      then how come i can't have real glass in a bar?

      You get your not real glass to go with your not real ale.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    33. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      "You can also make them "one per customer" although customers will get violent if you try to enforce that just because it says so on the coupon."

      Then you simply smile and say "bring it" as you reach for a gun.

      FTFY. This *is* an American website, after all.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    34. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      That Fannie and Freddie encouraged Countrywide to start the ball rolling with those standards, and thus everyone else followed suit.

      Yeah, too bad private banks gave shitty mortgages all on their own. Back to the drawing board, troll.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    35. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're not making a profit on discounted items and can't afford to sell at that price as often as the customer likes, you're doing it wrong. As I said, if I see that you give the same product to someone else and they pay less than I do, I rightly feel cheated and you won't like the consequences of that. The steeper discount might bring you new customers, but those who pay full price will be put off and look for steep discounts elsewhere. They'll become mercenary customers, who buy from whoever gives them the biggest discount. You killed their loyalty and your competitor buys them off. While you were looking at your MBA, you neglected that the customer is not a rational being. Excluding someone from a promotion is one of the worst things you can do as a business.

    36. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Killing customers makes the other ones scatter. Tazing them makes the others gather and want to kick the body. Tomorrow we are going to have several people killed over a 50% off price on a discontinued piece of crap at a walmart or other store. Americans have no qualms over killing each other to save some money.

      And yes, I know this is America. This is how we do it here.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    37. Re:And the moral of today's story is... by fat+bastard+of+doom · · Score: 1

      No, customers are not rational beings. Despite this, you have a promotion that is either time limited or numerically limited. That is the very definition of a promotion; it is limited and it ends. Despite their general lunacy, most customers understand this. You, as a manager enforcing these limits, are beholden to your superiors, who are beholden to all stakeholders. It is your and your company's job to balance the intent of the promotion with the execution of the discounts. If the intent is to move that product out then, by all means, run a no limit sale. There are plenty of them, and I see nothing wrong with that. Simple examples are dollar or percent off sales on a particular item for a set amount of time, generally to move out the product.

      This does not mean that, when the promotion ends, you keep giving the discount out to all and sundry. This is counterproductive. Your normal sales price is set where it is for a reason. Limited promotions are used because of this. As mentioned earlier, there is a set number of discounts that a company decides that it is able to absorb. If number is 100, and you give out 750, this heavily affects the net profit. Also, if you make these kind of exceptions once, you are expected to do it for everyone, every time.

      It should also be of note that customer loyalty is not involved when dealing with the 'steep discount' crowd. They are wedded to the discounts and, other than some slight level of brand preference, they will shop where the price is the lowest. It is not possible to sustain a business with the dubious 'loyalty' of these customers unless you are in the business of discounted retail or food. Take a look at the behavior of some people when it comes to gas prices. I have heard it said more than once that gasoline is the only product in which people will go miles out of their way and waste time in order to save pennies.

      I own and operate a grocery business, and do not use coupons for all of the reasons that have been brought up. I use limited time targeted price reductions, and these are effective for what I need, which is to move out old product. I do not use sales to encourage people to shop because, when all is said and done, my prices undercut the chain grocery stores by quite a bit. If I go much lower than my regular prices I make no money. Not only do I not make money, but the customers come in to buy the sale items and nothing else, and I never see them again. None of them convert to loyal customers.

      Back to the coupon example from Hardee's. This was a real example which, unfortunately, was more common than you might think. I spent 12 to 15 hours in the store 5 days a week. Do you think that my regular customers tried that? No, they did not. Do you think that, even if I gave that massive discount that I would ever see them again? No, I would not. People that try this sort of thing are generally people that found a stack of coupons and wanted something for nothing. Now, though the coupons were limited to 1 per customer, I had a policy to let them use multiple coupons in the order as long as they did not stack. They are going to use them at some point, so why not let them use them all at once. My hard line stance came from the stacking of multiple coupons affecting the same item and people wanting the limited BOGO coupon discount constantly with no coupons.

      Something else to think about, and this applies to retail as well as fast food. As a manager, your allowable payroll generally derives from the sales. This often does not take excess coupons into account. If you turn in $250.00 in coupons and you actually gave $1000.00 in discounts, your allowable payroll takes a hit. This affects your ability to properly serve your customers.

      Naturally, I am not any more likely to change your mind than your are to change mine. We are on opposite sides of the fence, and there is certainly room for both opinions. I would, however, like to do something that is rare here. I would like to thank you for an interesting and thought provoking discussion.

  3. Limits by heypete · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I seem to recall reading that Groupon allows businesses to limit the number of offers available. That is, rather than having to deal with 8,500 orders, Ms. Brown could have limited the offer to 100 (or some other arbitrary number) people.

    If my understanding is correct and such a system exists, it would be foolish for a business to not use it.

    1. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I seem to recall reading that Groupon allows businesses to limit the number of offers available. That is, rather than having to deal with 8,500 orders, Ms. Brown could have limited the offer to 100 (or some other arbitrary number) people.

      If my understanding is correct and such a system exists, it would be foolish for a business to not use it.

      Is there a minimum that Groupon makes businesses sign up for?

    2. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's in groupon's interest to not let the client do that. They get vast sums of money from these "deals" and they know the system doesn't do the small business any good, because the couponers are pretty much all piss taking free loaders.

    3. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's what I thought as well. Doesn't look like the Guardian did much research on this one...

      Groupon Stores Merchant FAQ

    4. Re:Limits by maeka · · Score: 2

      It's in groupon's interest to not let the client do that. They get vast sums of money from these "deals" and they know the system doesn't do the small business any good, because the couponers are pretty much all piss taking free loaders.

      Not only does Groupon allow businesses to set a limit, it very clearly is in Groupon's best interest to do so.
      If Groupon partners overextend themselves and deliver shitty service nobody will use Groupon.

    5. Re:Limits by Loether · · Score: 5, Interesting

      My wife uses Groupon all the time and so by extension I use Groupons. I hate them for precisely the GPs reason. Retailers ask if you are using a Groupon. If you say yes you almost always get substandard treatment/products. The companies who use Groupon overextend themselves and then hire temps or decrease quality to cover for their mistake. It's bad for businesses and bad for customers. The only one it's good for is Groupon.

      --
      TODO create witty sig.
    6. Re:Limits by cluedweasel · · Score: 1

      Not quite sure why the Guardian would be doing any research on behalf of The Daily Torygraph.................

    7. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Comeon... if that where 100% true your wife would not be using it all the time. More likely it's bad for customers of businesses who over extend their services. I do 75% off offers all the time I'd welcome 8,500 customers.

    8. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Best post in the thread.

    9. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "because the couponers are pretty much all piss taking free loaders."

      How so? They are paying for a product?

      What does urine have to do with anything? Totally crass.

    10. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      On the other hand, if vouchers go unused, Groupon receives 150%+ of what they otherwise would have received.

      The actual formula is in their Merchant terms and conditions calculated as such:

      - The 'Full value of the deal' is the sum before any discount (i.e. the $200 in 'receive $200 worth of haircare for $20'
      - The 'Amount paid' is the actual amount paid ($20).
      - For any unused voucher the merchant will receive the Amount Paid minus 25% of the Full Value of the Deal. In this case that's $20 - $50 = they get zero.

      GroupOn vouchers pretty much always have Amount Paid at maximum 50% of the Full Value, often much less. GroupOn therefore has a clear and immediate incentive for customers not to use their vouchers.

    11. Re:Limits by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it is the coupon crowd. They get off on going to the grocery store and getting paid for wheeling out a cart full of groceries. A serious bunch, they maintain photo albums full of coupons and spend anywhere from 6 to 10 hours per weeks gathering coupons.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    12. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This. I went to a greek restaraunt in Queens, NY once and they asked if I was paying with a coupon. I had no idea what they were talking about but it turned out that it was just the groupon deal and the people who did get the deal got a different menu than the rest of us with different prices too.

    13. Re:Limits by datavirtue · · Score: 2

      I just buy off-brand stuff and forgo the waste of time.

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    14. Re:Limits by Colonel+Korn · · Score: 1

      Comeon... if that where 100% true your wife would not be using it all the time. More likely it's bad for customers of businesses who over extend their services. I do 75% off offers all the time I'd welcome 8,500 customers.

      Why assume that people act rationally? It's usually not the case. A substantial chunk of America believes in astrology, but that doesn't mean it's real.

      Groupon is almost always terrible for the business, and when it's not, it's terrible for the customers.

      --
      "I zero-index my hamsters" - Willtor (147206)
    15. Re:Limits by blair1q · · Score: 1

      It's not just in Groupon's interest to leave that limit off. Spreading the opportunity to new customers is the point of coupons, and limiting it only to those who happen to see it limits your reach.

      The key here is the 75%, which is too big a discount. Groupon should know by now how many people will take advantage of something like that, and should apprise the merchant of the statistics. Then, instead of setting a hard limit, the merchant can select a smaller discount that still allows all interested parties to participate, but discourages apathetic freeloaders and aims at a number of participants that is more in line with the merchant's full capacity.

      But that's not in Groupon's interest. Groupon wants volume and for its hordes of users to be happy because that's the volume that means revenue to them and revenue means their stock goes up.

      Same result, different variable. Groupon would make you promise 100% discounts to everyone on Earth if they thought they could get away with it.

    16. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are thinking like someone who wants to build a company to last for decades. What matters to the owners of Groupon is that they can post high revenues for a couple of quarters and then have an IPO.

    17. Re:Limits by BigSes · · Score: 1

      Wow, dick, you could have just said "Different minimums for different businesses." You know, not everyone is completely familiar with their policies and not every needs to be talked down to for asking a simple question.

    18. Re:Limits by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 1

      Notwithstanding the poster's hilarious urinary colloquialism, what he's saying is the people attracted to deep discounts like that are unlikely to ever become full-price regular paying customers once the deal is over.

      "Taking the piss" is British slang (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taking_the_piss). Get a sense of humor. Really.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    19. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually old chap, I believe the GP needs to get a sense of humour. Pip pip!

    20. Re:Limits by History's+Coming+To · · Score: 1

      Groupon also allows you to unsubscribe from their emails. As far as I can tell you have to mark it as spam a few times, block their domain, and then it goes away.

      --
      Please consider this account deleted, I just can't be bothered with the spam anymore.
    21. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having gone through the Groupon experience (I own a bakery), I can tell you that you really don't have a clue as to how these things work.

      Groupon does not have 'partners' - they have customers, and that's us, the store owners. Groupon is not the store owners friend. It's in the Groupon's salescritters best interest to sell as many coupons as they can to get as much money on the 'deal' as they can for themselves (not 100% sure, but I'd bet that they're commission based - they're certainly aggressive enough).

      Limits are not mentioned until brought up by the owner, or needed as a rebuttal to an objection made by the owner. And then they're *strongly* discouraged.

      We were considering doing a Groupon for cupcakes as the margin is better and we wouldn't be out of pocket as much, but the salescritter kept pushing us to do a Groupon for our pies (at 60% off no less). We'd end up loosing $7 per pie if we took this deal. There is no way in the world that this deal would have worked for us - even if we called it a 'marketing expense' (which seems to be the Groupon way to justify a really bad deal).

      We ended up not going through with it. Refusing the deal doesn't seem to stop at least one Groupon (or lookalike) critter from calling us *every single day* and trying to pitch it to us again.

    22. Re:Limits by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Not only does Groupon allow businesses to set a limit, it very clearly is in Groupon's best interest to do so.
      If Groupon partners overextend themselves and deliver shitty service nobody will use Groupon.

      It's not in Groupon's long-term interest, but that assumes that Groupon is a legitimate business with long-term interest, rather than barely concealed scam.

      There have been numerous stories about Groupon, all of which seem to come down to the fact that Groupon will always try to convince the business owner to eschew any limits and to drop the price as much as possible, drawing in as many customers as possible. In some cases, they make it a condition of the deal ("either you do it this way, or we walk away"). Obviously, this is not actually in the best interest of those businesses (as they normally find out shortly after), and clearly this means that Groupon is just trying to skim money here and now from all those sold coupons, going until their reputation is sullied bad enough that no business will take their offer anymore.

    23. Re:Limits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never used groupon but a thing like it. Dallas, TX has a entertainment.com deal of the day thing. There's no exp. date. If I get one, I always go there awhile later for precisely this reason - don't get substandard product.

  4. Stupid is as stupid does. by pyite · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I may hate Groupon, but this person has no one to blame but herself. Do the math. If you sell that many coupons, even if only a fraction of them are redeemed, that's a lot of cupcakes.

    --

    "Nature doesn't care how smart you are. You can still be wrong." - Richard Feynman

    1. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by timeOday · · Score: 1, Troll

      Your short post has a high percentage of "hate" and "stupid." Hey, she goofed up, it happens, even AT&T DDOS'd their own network with the iPhone. She wasn't being malicious, let's just learn something from her mistake and move on. A year from now she'll probably still be running her own small business and most of us will still be sniping at people on the Internet.

    2. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I may hate Groupon, but this person has no one to blame but herself. Do the math. If you sell that many coupons, even if only a fraction of them are redeemed, that's a lot of cupcakes.

      The point is that promoting your business via Groupon is very often a big mistake, unless you have a lot of perishable unsold inventory.

      Selling via Groupon doesn't do much to build your business, since most Groupon buyers are cheap - instead of looking to become regular full-price customers, they will look for the next Groupon.

      The customer is loyal to Groupon, not the businesses that sell via Groupon.

    3. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your short post has a high percentage of "hate" and "stupid." Hey, she goofed up, it happens, even AT&T DDOS'd their own network with the iPhone.

      You ARE aware of the words used here on Slashdot to describe that exact scenario when it happened, right? Most of them were far, far stronger than "hate" and "stupid", they came in much higher percentages per post, and they were delivered in posts of all shapes, sizes, and lengths.

    4. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by nospam007 · · Score: 0

      "...let's just learn something from her mistake and move on. A year from now she'll probably still be running her own small business..."

      I doubt that. This indicates that she not the dimmest notion of the math required to run a business.
      Additionally she won't pay any taxes with such a loss and you guys will have to make up for it.

    5. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by silverglade00 · · Score: 1

      She got some great publicity about her commitment to customers. She got her name out there on the greater Internet. She even did it in a way that gives her a tax break. All she had to do was apologize and say "Sorry these aren't that good, but I was busy. Buy some later and they will be better quality, I promise!" Sounds like she is doing pretty good to me.

    6. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by zazzel · · Score: 2

      The customer is loyal to Groupon, not the businesses that sell via Groupon.

      Any of these marketing devices do that. In my city, you can buy a coupon book for a (rather long) list of restaurants (usually two meals for the price of one). Behaviour? You buy the book, take your s.o. and then visit every place exactly ONE time. The book will last you a year. Next year: same procedure.

      The restaurants in there put themselves in a horrible position, since they have no repeat customers. If they drop quality, they will have bad reviews, too! So it's only profitable for restaurant owners who did not think long enough about "location, location, location".

    7. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by SumterLiving · · Score: 1

      Sorry nospam007. A mistake in business doesn't mean you are stupid and will never be successful. But don't let a boatload of history get in the way of your opinion.

    8. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by 140Mandak262Jamuna · · Score: 1
      If the one time customers can be served at a no-loss basis, they will help keep the lights on and defray the fixed costs. And if you convert a few to regulars you are ahead of the game. The trick is to serve them at no loss basis. Most restaurants can serve an additional entree at 50% of menu price, or they limit these coupons to items with least cost.

      I saw an analysis that Groupon is simply a large short term loan to these businesses with a huge interest load. Except the repayment is "in kind" instead of money, and this comes in masquerading as an advertisement scheme that gives money to the merchant unlike all other coupon deals where the merchant pays for the ad costs. Young entrepreneurs who have more dreams than sense bite it hook, line and the sinker.

      --
      sed -e 's/Chuck Norris/Rajnikant/g' joke > fact
    9. Re:Stupid is as stupid does. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They most probably do have repeat customers, but that set probably doesn't intersect with the set of deadbeats who choose where to eat based solely on a coupon book. Secondly, the way I understand it, a restaurant has fixed costs every night its open and so a full table is better than an empty table.

      If the coupon is for 2 for 1 on main courses (cheapest free), the absolute worst case is that 2 people come in, order 2 of the cheapest main courses with the smallest margin, eat nothing else and drink only tap water. The only way the restaurant will lose out is if the cost to prepare the two meals is not covered by the price paid. Now, what would more often happen is that a couple (or a couple and their friends) would show up, have a starter/dessert because they're saving money on the main course, have a couple of drinks and boom, they've made money.

  5. When will businesses realize by Draconis183 · · Score: 0

    That Groupon is not good business? Lets discount more than 50%, then pay a hefty commission on top of that.
    Unfortunately these small businesses don't do the math and there are many stories like this.

    1. Re:When will businesses realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Groupon is great for business. Retarded small business owners not putting limits on their groupons are bad for business. Besides, she loses 20k now. She will probably gain 10x that over the next few years through increased exposure. That's 8500 customers that possibly would have never known about her shop.

    2. Re:When will businesses realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do you get extra cheap coupons or just plain salary at the Groupon PR department?

    3. Re:When will businesses realize by spire3661 · · Score: 5, Informative

      The conversion rate for grouponers is abysmal. They are locusts out swarming for the next deal.

      --
      Good-bye
    4. Re:When will businesses realize by CubicleView · · Score: 2

      I think it must really depend on the deal being offered. Groupon were spamming me every day about some (expired :S) mattress deal recently. I can’t imagine that offer would lead to much repeat business from a typical /. user, since they don’t tend to wear a matress out that quickly... However I did find a nice restaurant recently because of a discount I purchased from a different company, and I would definitely consider eating there again even without the discount. The same could be true of these cupcakes, if they’re good value without the discount, it should definitely lead to new business, just maybe not 20Ks worth...

    5. Re:When will businesses realize by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "... a typical /. user, since they don’t tend to wear a mattress out that quickly ...".

      Is that supposed to be some sort of veiled insult towards slashdotters, that they don't see much action between the sheets? If so, it's a far more subtle humour than I'm used to here :-)

  6. Just 102k? by DWMorse · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure she can do it. It'll be a piece of cake. 102,000 pieces.

    --
    There's a spot in User Info for World of Warcraft account names? Really?
    1. Re:Just 102k? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sure she can do it. It'll be a piece of cake. 102,000 pieces.

      All you have to do is take a ton of flour, add it to the mix!
      Now back up the truck with something sweet, not sour, a pound of salt, just a pinch!
      Baking these treats is such a cinch, add a gallon of vanilla!
      If there's a demand you bake a hundred grand, but ya never get your filla'...
      Cupcakes! So sweet and tasty!
      Cupcakes! Don't be too hasty!
      Cupcakes! (Customers poop on!)
      Cupcakes! (Bankrupt by Groupon!)

      Cupcakes! Cupcakes cupcakes cupcaaaaaaakes!

      (Now aren't you glad this is a Groupon thread and not an Apple thread? :)

  7. Geez... by Ron+Harwood · · Score: 4, Informative

    Are people bad at math or something?

    From their FAQ:

    Can I set limits on my deals?

    Yes. You can limit the total number of purchasers. You can also set restrictions on how customers use the deal. For example, if you're a restaurant you can limit the use of Groupons per table or per order.

    1. Re:Geez... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yes, people are very bad a math.

      As evidence I cite MegaMillions, Power Ball, and the continued existence of Vegas with its billion dollar hotel/casinos.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    2. Re:Geez... by MozeeToby · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Math and lotteries only don't work out if you base your math on the idea that $100,000,000 is worth 100,000,000 x $1. It is not. Above a certain number, large sums of money become "anything I want and never have to work again" which people value at much more than 100,000,000 times "a cheap cup of coffee".

    3. Re:Geez... by Dog-Cow · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A lot of people gamble for the fun of it, you know. There is value to the thrill of potential winnings, and that value may very well be greater than the dollar amount spent.

      Granted, there are a lot of suckers too, especially in Vegas.

    4. Re:Geez... by jittles · · Score: 1

      What do you mean? With odds of 1 in 250 million for winning powerball, I just have to buy 250 million tickets to win that 100 million jackpot!

    5. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      True, but it doesn't say what Groupon representatives say about this on the phone to the company.

    6. Re:Geez... by Tyler+Eaves · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, you've got it exactly backwards. Marginal utility of each additional $ goes DOWN as the amount goes up.

      Look at it this way - Say I give you $1,000,000. For most people, this is absolutely life changing - pay the house off, do what you want for a few years, generally be secure. Now say let's flip a coin, double or nothing. Unless you are already quite rich, you should NEVER take that bet - $2m would be nicer, sure, but compared to the difference between $1m and $0, it's no where close to being twice as good.

      If the amounts go up a lot - to Bill Gates $1m would be essentially meaningless.

      --
      TODO: Something witty here...
    7. Re:Geez... by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The math for the odds of winning powerball are 1 in a hundred million. (1 in a hundred M, 1 in 130 M, 1 in 200M same difference, roughly. ) and each dollar you spend increases those odds to $x in 100 million.

      According to today's XKCD you need to have over 4 million in investments, which mean that the only prize that really counts for never having to work again is the big one.

      So your odds of winning and never having to work again are very small until you start spending millions of dollars on tickets.

      --
      If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
    8. Re:Geez... by Megane · · Score: 1

      Math and lotteries only don't work out if you base your math on the idea that $100,000,000 is worth 100,000,000 x $1.

      A lot of math doesn't work if you make it up from gut instinct, and completely ignore that the $100,000,000 is effectively $100,000,000 x .000000005. IIRC, the Texas Lottery has a 50/45/5 division of the money it takes in, with the 5% going to the retailer who sells the ticket, and 45% going to the state and the costs of running the lottery. So every dollar you put in gives you an effective payback of 50 cents. Some people happen to win big payouts, but it is intentionally a zero-sum situation, and most people won't even break even. For every million dollar winner, there are two million losers who lost their dollar.

      To paraphrase WOPR, "The only way to win is to run the game."

      --
      #naabhaprzrag, #sverubfr-000, #agi-fcbafberq, negvpyr[pynff*=' negvpyr-ary-'] { qvfcynl: abar !vzcbegnag; }
    9. Re:Geez... by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Yes, people are very bad a math.

      As evidence I cite MegaMillions, Power Ball, and the continued existence of Vegas with its billion dollar hotel/casinos.

      You don't understand that buying a lottery ticket is more than just owning an almost non-existent chance of winning enough money to actually change your life. It is the opportunity to spend a buck or two and spend several very pleasant days fantasizing about what life would be like if you do win. Seen that way, it isn't a bad bargain at all. It's certainly better than spending that couple of bucks on some high fructose corn syrup favored carbonated water that's tough on your liver, metabolism, and overall health.

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    10. Re:Geez... by Firethorn · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Unless you are already quite rich, you should NEVER take that bet

      Yeah, but GP's point was that human's math sense is broken at those high levels. Those who can handle the differences and have certain other traits are the ones who get to be rich.

      Those who's math sense is broken worse than average are the types buying lottery tickets as a retirement strategy.

      Yes, the marginal utility of the next $ when NetValue=$1M is much less than when NV=$1. But humans typically don't think that way.

      You're doing pretty good if you can conceptualize that a million bucks is just a million bucks.

      --
      I don't read AC A human right
    11. Re:Geez... by rjstanford · · Score: 2

      Another way of looking at it is like this.

      Buying no tickets costs $0 and gains you nothing, and you have absolutely no chance of winning.
      Buying one ticket costs $1 and gains you a pleasant few minutes of fantasy. Might be worth it, might not. It also gives you a real (yet tiny) chance of winning.
      Buying ten tickets costs $10 and gains you the same fantasy, but at 10X the price. You still have only a tiny chance of winning.

      Bottom line - buy no tickets, or one ticket, but never more than one. There's no gain.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    12. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MozeeToby is actually saying almost the same thing as you. He is saying that because $1m is such a life changing amount of money people value it greater than $1m is worth. Basically he is saying that people might spend small amounts of money on things that make them happy for a short time like coffee but in the long run having a large sum of money at once can be much more satisfying.

    13. Re:Geez... by Quila · · Score: 2

      It's only being bad at math if a person expects to win.

      Playing for the hell of it or for the thrill of watching the drawing with money on the line is just fine. You paid your money for this form of entertainment just as you would have paid for any other.

    14. Re:Geez... by TheLink · · Score: 2

      Regarding the lotteries, think about it from this POV:

      The odds of the typically poor people who buy lottery tickets becoming super rich multimillionaires if they didn't buy lottery tickets but instead tried other ways, is probably lower than if they did buy lottery tickets :).

      I generally don't buy lottery tickets[1], and I think the odds of me becoming one of those super multimillionaires are practically zero.

      Yes there are some poor people who become multimillionaires through hard work and some luck. But there many millions who wouldn't. Believe me, there are lots of hardworking poor people. Some even try to start businesses and unfortunately don't succeed. They don't go around selling books titled "How I kept trying, failing and somehow still never succeeded"[2].

      That said, yes you can probably be a millionaire if you didn't start off too low and didn't screw up too badly. But you still won't be "I won the lottery" rich.

      [1] Once in long while I buy them when the jackpot has accumulated (due to nobody winning) enough that if you actually could buy all of the possible numbers, you'd still make money (assuming not too many bought the winning numbers ;) ). When this happens it's called investment not gambling ;).

      [2] By the way, I'm sure you've seen those books where one rich guy says he succeeded by not giving up. Then you have another book where a rich guy says he succeeded by knowing when to quit. Then you have another rich guy saying he succeeded by starting many different businesses at the same time and closing down the ones that don't succeed. Then you have yet another rich guy saying he succeeded by focusing on one thing... Another rich guy says "buy property", but if you bought the wrong property < 2008, you'd now be stuck paying off a loan that's a lot more than your property. So go figure.

      --
    15. Re:Geez... by pak9rabid · · Score: 1

      A lot of people gamble for the fun of it

      Or for the free drinks ;)

    16. Re:Geez... by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2

      Do you have insurance? I bet you do... and it's almost the same thing; you are just betting on something bad happening to you (and probably hoping that it never happens). But in the end, insurance companies are not charities; they make money and plenty of it. On average, you will pay more in premiums than you will ever get back in claims, just like gamblers. So: don't gamble with money you cannot afford to miss, and don't take out insurance unless you cannot afford to self-insure.

      Math isn't the whole story; the simple fact is that it is never about the averages / expectation value (though it will help you find the better deal for your dollar). Insurance buys you peace of mind. Gambling gives you a small chance at winning more money than you could possibly amass in your lifetime with hard work. Both these things have value.

      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    17. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If the amounts go up a lot - to Bill Gates $1m would be essentially meaningless.

      That's purely subjective. It's not necessarily true.

    18. Re:Geez... by Toonol · · Score: 1

      You're correct, but I'd value $1,000,000 as less then 1,000,000 x $1. I'd even say that the first $250,000 is as valuable to me as the next $750,000, in terms of the effect it would have on my life.

      However, this value needs to be set by each person, so I'm not really disagreeing with you.

    19. Re:Geez... by Krishnoid · · Score: 1

      If the amounts go up a lot - to Bill Gates $1m would be essentially meaningless.

      In fact, the figure is $1000 for it to be a literal waste of his time. It used to be $20, I think.

    20. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction:

      That's for the Groupon Stores service, which is now dead, and which is a distinctly different product than what most people mean when they say "Groupon".

      Regular Groupon does not let merchants set voucher limits.

    21. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to today's XKCD you need to have over 4 million in investments, which mean that the only prize that really counts for never having to work again is the big one.

      I will gladly quit working for only a measly 2 million in investments. If you don't believe me, give me $2 million and I will prove it.

    22. Re:Geez... by thesandtiger · · Score: 2

      Hell, I value the fun discussions with my friends about what kind of crazy things we would do with $100,000,000, the day dreams about winning, and the jolt of adrenaline when checking for a (hah!) winner more than I value a dollar.

      For $1 a week I get to have all that and marginally support my local schools. Not many things as fun you can have for under 15 cents a day...

      With Vegas, too, it's actually quite easy to come out ahead:

      - Go to a casino that gives you a free drink if you put $20 in a machine. Put $20 into a dollar slot, get your free drink, play a single game, cash out and move on to the next casino (or to a different part in that casino). Do it with friends, do it while people watching and it's a good time had for quite a low cost.

      - Go to a decent hotel/casino, put a few thousand dollars on deposit, enjoy your "free" suite on the house - nobody says you have to gamble.

      Cheap in the way a Grouponer is cheap!

      --
      Since I can't tell them apart, I treat all ACs as the same person.
    23. Re:Geez... by tunapez · · Score: 1

      For every million dollar winner, there are two million losers who lost their dollar.

      Well put. Also, when you see the lotteries promoting all the winners, keep in mind a 'wash' is considered a 'win'. The vast majority didn't win a thing, they just didn't lose their dollar.

      Wasn't WOPR's message: "nobody wins in Global Thermonuclear War and tic-tac-toe, so don't play"?

      --
      Imagination drew in bold strokes, instantly serving hopes and fears, while knowledge advanced by slow increments...
    24. Re:Geez... by mr1911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, people are very bad a math.

      As evidence I cite MegaMillions, Power Ball, and the continued existence of Vegas with its billion dollar hotel/casinos.

      The common refrain "the lottery is a tax on those bad at math" is incorrect.

      The correct euphemism is "the lottery is a tax on hopelessness". For $1, they get a sliver of hope they will change their lives and live happily ever after.

      Go ahead and cite math. Go ahead and point out that lottery winners often blow through their winnings rather quickly and wind up no better than where they started. Go ahead and talk to yourself since logic and reason take a back seat to emotion with most people.

      --
      This post comes with a double-your-money-back guarantee!
      Any offense taken to this post is at your sole discretion.
    25. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't understand that buying a lottery ticket is more than just owning an almost non-existent chance of winning enough money to actually change your life. It is the opportunity to spend a buck or two and spend several very pleasant days fantasizing about what life would be like if you do win. Seen that way, it isn't a bad bargain at all. It's certainly better than spending that couple of bucks on some high fructose corn syrup favored carbonated water that's tough on your liver, metabolism, and overall health.

      I'd argue that that IS a bad bargain. If you're going to fantasize about what life would be like rich, you might as well save the couple bucks and change your fantasy to finding a suitcase full of money (which carries about the same odds!) That way you get to do your fantasizing AND save your money for more intelligent purchases... like soda.

    26. Re:Geez... by tompaulco · · Score: 2

      What do you mean? With odds of 1 in 250 million for winning powerball, I just have to buy 250 million tickets to win that 100 million jackpot!
      No, the other people are still going to pay, so if you buy 250 million tickets, you will have a 50% chance of winning 100 million. Oh, that's $50 million if you take it as lump sum. $25 million after taxes. So, expected value of spending $250 million on powerball tickets is $12.5 million.

      --
      If you are not allowed to question your government then the government has answered your question.
    27. Re:Geez... by NeutronCowboy · · Score: 1

      That might be true, but lottery doesn't work that way. It's either get the massive payout, or get nothing. There is no "Here's a million, now flip the coin again for double or nothing". Furthermore, the concept of marginal utility ignores the fact that people aren't fully rational beings. People don't spend a dollar on the optimal food source that will sustain them the best through the day, they spend a dollar to feel good about starting the day. Whether that's a cup of coffee from Starbucks (ok, $8) or a lottery ticket, it really doesn't matter that much.

      What is true, however, is that you should never, ever buy a lottery ticket with survival funds. The lottery isn't an investment strategy (well, except in some specific cases, apparently). Instead, it should be regarded as fun money. Whether you spend $5 on a movie or on a lottery ticket is pretty irrelevant. It's entertainment; go have fun. If that's how you want to spend your surplus money, be my guest. Just don't think you'll get out of a debt hole with that.

      --
      Those who can, do. Those who can't, sue.
    28. Re:Geez... by pseudofengshui · · Score: 1

      To Steve Jobs, $1M would be equally meaningless. Too soon?

      --
      [Text goes here]
    29. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Math and lotteries only don't work out if you base your math on the idea that $100,000,000 is worth 100,000,000 x $1. It is not. Above a certain number, large sums of money become "anything I want and never have to work again" which people value at much more than 100,000,000 times "a cheap cup of coffee".

      Holy crap, that makes no sense at all. Here's the actual math: your odds of winning the jackpot are low enough that you can safely assume you won't. So it doesn't matter how enticing the prize is, because you won't get it.

      The standard response to that is, "people win every day." Yes, the odds are not zero. Those people did something extremely stupid and ended up surviving. There are also people who survived falls from 7 stories up. That doesn't mean you should jump from that height. It means they got lucky, and you'd be stupid to risk anything because you think you might get just as lucky.

    30. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some of us prefer to not live in our parents basement.

    31. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But the difference between $2m and $1m is only 50%, whereas the difference between $1m and my current net is something like 99%. You can be damn sure I'd flip that $1m for another $99m; that amount makes the difference between living a normal life with a paid-off house and a nice retirement fund, and living a permanent vacation.

    32. Re:Geez... by ShaunC · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase WOPR, "The only way to win is to run the game."

      I thought the only way to win was not to play at all.

      --
      Thanks to the War on Drugs, it's easier to buy meth than it is to buy cold medicine!
    33. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm sorry you have to spend money in order to be able to fantasize. Most of us are able to do that at no monetary cost.

    34. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or it's cheap hope. Depends what you value, I guess.

    35. Re:Geez... by Fex303 · · Score: 1

      Do you have insurance? I bet you do... and it's almost the same thing

      Not quite. With insurance you're guaranteed to 'win' if something bad happens to you. (Except when insurance companies are being complete jerks.) That's the key point. If your insurance payouts were tied to something that wasn't your personal situation, say the roll of a dice, it would be gambling - but since insurance payouts are tied to you being a in situation where you really need the money, it makes a lot more economic sense.

    36. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Reminds me of a TED talk about monkeys: http://www.ted.com/talks/laurie_santos.html?c=135492

    37. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's more than just probabilities and whether something is a good bet. It's about risk vs reward. Let's be for real - $1 spent on one of those big game lotteries is not a huge risk for the majority of the population out there. I can't think of anyone I know here in the US in which if they spend an extra dollar a month, that it would negatively impact them in any real apparent way. But I guarantee you that if they won one of these games, their lives would change dramatically.

      So, instead of looking at this as a bad bet in terms of win/loss ratios, instead look at it as basically betting so little that it doesn't affect them at all, for the off chance that if they actually win, they're set. The difference between spending $1 or $2 on megamillions is not a big difference in terms of probabilities to win, but the difference between spending no money or $1 is, well, huge.

    38. Re:Geez... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      To Steve Jobs, $1M would be equally meaningless.

      Too soon?

      Nope. $1m has been useless to Steve Jobs for a couple of weeks now.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    39. Re:Geez... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase WOPR, "The only way to win is to run the game."

      I think that is Skynet. But now you've given me a good idea for a movie...

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    40. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bottom line - buy no tickets, or one ticket, but never more than one. There's no gain.

      Unless you're mathematicians who have analyzed the lottery, pooled their money and routinely buy staggering amounts of tickets to give themselves extremely good odds of winning. Saw a story about this last year about some people who did just that and were apparently fairly successful at it.

    41. Re:Geez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was in a casino in Singapore. You can get free drinks without playing. So I got my free drinks, then after a while of watching my friends play, I made my first ever bet in casino- 5 singapore dollars on roulette. Won, then cashed out.

      Came back a few days later for more free drinks (which include bottles of water you can carry out :) ).

      Disclosure: I owned shares in that casino's _competitor_. ;)

    42. Re:Geez... by TheLink · · Score: 1

      Perhaps most humans have broken math sense.

      But:
      1) most people don't live forever.
      2) I suggest (without a shred of evidence ;) ) that many of those poor people buying those tickets have a higher chance of becoming super rich multi-millionaires if they bought lottery ticket than if they didn't and tried to work their way into becoming super rich instead.

      How many super rich millionaires are there who started out as poor as them but _average_ in other respects - e.g. discipline, intelligence, business acumen, initiative, etc?

      I know a number of hardworking poor people who I can bet are never going to be super rich multimillionaires in their lifetime. They didn't win the genetic lottery, nor the "born rich" lottery. So if they bought a lottery ticket, their odds just go up. Not by much of course, but they might even have a higher chance of becoming a rich multimillionaire than I do...

      See also: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=2539154&cid=38138470

      --
    43. Re:Geez... by metrometro · · Score: 1

      GroupOns are sold on the phone by a sales team with incentives to maximize deal size. What makes you think she got anything approaching full disclosure?

  8. doh! by sgt+scrub · · Score: 3, Funny

    Let them eat cupcake?

    --
    Having to work for a living is the root of all evil.
  9. Why didn't she set a limit? by Evro · · Score: 1

    Why didn't she simply limit the number of coupons that could be sold? I've seen other Groupons with limits. Sounds like she fucked up.

    --
    rooooar
    1. Re:Why didn't she set a limit? by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      According to the article, "Heather Dickinson, a Groupon spokeswoman, said there was no limit to the number of vouchers that could be sold. She said: “We approach each business with a tailored, individual approach based on the prior history of similar deals.” "

      This is a tailored approach? Groupon seems to only get this kind a negative publicity. I can't see them as being a long term viable entity.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    2. Re:Why didn't she set a limit? by residieu · · Score: 1

      Not saying it's not her fault for failing to ask about putting a limit, but if Groupon were a responsible business, they would bring up the issue of limits during this discussion to come up with their "tailored approach".

    3. Re:Why didn't she set a limit? by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      There are very few "good" businesses in that sense these days, and for good reason: there isn't money in it. People expect cheap and they expect quick. They don't want to pay extra for the extra care (though they'll feel free to moan about not getting it of course) and if you try insist they it is worth paying the extra for you to take more time and effort with their case/order they may well just play the "we can pay you X for Y, or we can pay the guy down the road X for Y, your choice" card.

      Of course now most businesses are competing on price/volume rather than quality or care there is a lot of competition at that end of the market so the sales people are getting more than a tad dodgy in order to meet their targets (so they keep the volume so can keep being cheap enough to compete with everyone else).

      This means customers are going to be harassed and conned more and more, getting worse quality products and services. I can see two ways to change this but neither are going to happen. You could try educate the companies to the fact that by competing purely in price+volume they are running themselves into the ground as well as their competitors (this won't happen because they all dream of being the one that survives to corner the market, or being the one that somehow magically breaks the mould). You could try educating the average customer that by constantly demanding close-to-or-below-break-even pricing, by travelling to a hypermarket to save pennies (spending more in petrol and/or time than they'll save) instead of using a decent local business, and so on, they are hurting their choices long-term (that won't work because the average customer is the general public - have you ever tried educating some of them?!).

  10. Very common by tripleevenfall · · Score: 5, Informative

    Stories in the press abound of small business retailers, particularly restaurants, living to regret making an offer on Groupon. These entities live on forming relationships with customers. Groupon brings in people who are only there to eat on the cheap and won't likely return.

    Example story: http://posiescafe.com/wp/?p=316

    "we met many, many terrible Groupon customers customers that didn’t follow the Groupon rules and used multiple Groupons for single transactions, and argued with you about it with disgusted looks on their faces, or who tipped based on what they owed (10% of $0 is zero dollars, so tossing in a dime was them being generous). "

    1. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      That's unfortunate, ever single groupon says something along the lines of "tip for the full amount of the bill", but it, like all tipping is just a suggestion. The kind of people who would leave a 0% tip because they got their meal for free are probably also the kind of people who would have left a 5% tip on whatever they did pay.

      Groupon does not make shitty patrons, it does potentially bring shitty patrons to places they otherwise wouldn't have thought to go.

    2. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      To be fair, tipping can't be based on a percentage one time and then on some set amount another time.

      In any case, tipping in America is bullshit and is out of control.

    3. Re:Very common by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      I agree with this but directing one's ire at the waitstaff, who live on tips, instead of Groupon or a retailer is misplaced.

    4. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And that, children, is why (true) communism will never ever ever work, because it relies on 100% of population having morals.

    5. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If waitstaff is making less than minimum wage in tips, then the employer is obliged by law to cover the difference. Waitstaff can report and then sue for wrongful termination. This is the American way. Female waitstaff can become prostitutes and/or strippers.

      I feel no sympathy for waitstaff that don't get tipped. I tip for good service. Not always.

    6. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "If waitstaff is making less than minimum wage in tips, then the employer is obliged by law to cover the difference."

      But what about the difference between minimum wage and a living wage? Sorry, but tipping in American restaurants and similar establishments is not "for good service"; it is "for service". If you want to express appreciation for good service, you give them an good tip; otherwise you give them a modest one. If you don't tip someone at all because she didn't flirt with you enough, or because he just did the job without enthusiasm, you're not just failing to give them a bonus, you're failing to pay them for the work they did. It's legal, but it's assholish.

    7. Re:Very common by TheLink · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I personally think the concept of near "compulsory" tipping as practiced by restaurants in some countries is messed up.

      At work I don't get tipped for just doing my job, and if my company's customers gave me money directly for just doing my job, or for doing my job differently/better than normal, that's called corruption or just plain wrong. Heck at some places you're not allowed to accept gifts/$$$ above a certain value (usually low, sometimes even _zero_) from customers.

      In theory if your employer isn't paying you enough to do your job, you should find another employer or another job. But in practice the "tipping" system is not likely to change in those countries...

      --
    8. Re:Very common by Tenebrousedge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In e.g. Ohio, the legal minimum wage for tip-earning workers is a miserable fraction of the normal minimum wage, and employers do not have any obligation to improve that. The American way is to fucking tip your waitstaff, because that's their primary income. They're lucky if they don't have to split their tips with the house, or other servers.

      You think minimum wage ought to be enough for anyone? Wake up and smell the 21st Century. Not tipping your wait staff isn't your private revolution: it simply makes you a sociopath of the meanest degree.

      --
      Those who advocate genocide deserve every protection afforded by law, and none afforded by common human decency.
    9. Re:Very common by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      They don't take the job on the promise of minimum wage. They work these jobs because you can make a liveable wage based on tips. When a groupon freeloader or primadonna customer comes in and takes out anger or selfishness not on management but on some single mom or college student, nothing gets better.

      If tips dry up, staff won't be able to keep those jobs and pay bills. Then the owner will need to pay waitstaff more which raises the fixed price of meals. Currently the system is flexible to allow us to decide how much to pay for service, but it won't continue to be that way if it's always abused.

      If waiting tables was truly a minimum wage job you'd find immigrants doing those jobs because they would present a cheaper alternative to the employer. They'd work more hours and have less scheduling issues and require less staff overall.

    10. Re:Very common by Rinikusu · · Score: 1

      Why can't it based on a percentage one time and then some set amount another time? Are you a robot? Are you so inflexible or so mentally inept that you cannot handle contingency situations on the fly?

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    11. Re:Very common by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      By and large, people making minimum wage do not live below the poverty line in the United States. This is because most of them are minors or live in multiple income homes.

      The people who live below the poverty line in the United States are people who have difficulty maintaining employment throughout the year, not people who make low hourly wages.

    12. Re:Very common by afabbro · · Score: 2

      Mr Pink, is that you?

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    13. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The amount I tip has nothing to do with what is owed.

      If the service sucks, the tip will suck too. If the service is excellent, the tip grows correspondingly.

      Any restaurant that insists on an automatic gratuity can go kiss my ass.

    14. Re:Very common by hazem · · Score: 1

      > To be fair, tipping can't be based on a percentage one time and then on some set amount another time.

      What my parents taught me was that if you use a coupon like this that dramatically reduces the cost of the meal,or have part of your meal comped, you calculate your tip based on the pre-coupon cost.

      Tip what you want, I suppose.

    15. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, its a messed up minimum wage system that has no right to exist in that state and businesses are using it to skimp out on paying their staff in return for customer charity. Maybe it is a culture in the US now that you should always Tip X% of the cost but thats not normal for most the world and I doubt you'll find many outside of the areas that "enforce" it that would agree with the system.

    16. Re:Very common by residieu · · Score: 1

      But that flexibility all comes from the waitstaff. I think more often I'm dissatisfied with a restaurant because of the food. But I can't withhold money from the cook staff for cooking the food poorly, or from the owner for buying poor ingredients. I can only punish the waitress is she messes up tell the cooks my order, or drops my food, or forgets about me. And I may end up punishing her for something that's not her fault (My food took forever because the cooks messed it up and she had to send it back.)

    17. Re:Very common by residieu · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Mr. Pink's rant wouldn't be funny if he didn't have a point.

    18. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not based on a percentage one time and a set amount some other time. It's based on a percentage of the price of your meal. It makes no difference whether you are paying for the meal with cash, plastic, or a coupon or gift card - you tip a percentage of the price of your meal. Not what it costs you... the total price.

      Only a complete dickhead would think they can give no tip because it was "free" after they used their coupon or a gift card. And if such a person ever dared come back to the same restaurant again, I'd hope their food was served horribly over- or undercooked, two hours late, and cold.

    19. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In e.g. Ohio, the legal minimum wage for tip-earning workers is a miserable fraction of the normal minimum wage ...

      There is your problem right there.

    20. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yup, those poor waitstaff... everyone single one of whom reports every cent of their tips to the IRS so that they pay their fair share of taxes... right?

    21. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ah, yes, you're right. I am responsible for Ohio's backwards laws.
      Sorry, I forgot for a second how as a non-US citizen, I have an obligation to correct your legally codified social injustices.

      Seriously, I cannot believe that you provide the example of a law which basically legalises slavery to underline that we're supposed to give money away. I'll tip when I feel like it, and most certainly not to justify some law which is a moral (if perhaps not legal) violation of basic human rights.

    22. Re:Very common by tripleevenfall · · Score: 1

      The way you punish them for a poor meal is not to eat there again.

    23. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You need to change your system so that your waitstaff are directly paid a living wage, and don't have to rely on the charity of their "betters". If everyone refused to participate in the current broken system, it would get changed, fast.

    24. Re:Very common by Tom · · Score: 1

      Sorry, what?

      I know I'm on dangerous terrain here, but it isn't my fault that the waiters get paid miserably. I'm not under an obligation to compensate for a fucked-up system, franchise or management.

      Yes, I do tip. Based on the service, my mood, and whatever makes a nice round value. What I protest against is telling me that tipping is in any way mandatory. Not if there's already a service charge on the bill.

      Plus I don't support a system that makes one part of the restaurant depend on me and the rest not. I would much rather want to pay the cook based on the quality of the dish then the waiter based on the quality of the service.

      Yes, the system is fucked. No, the solution is not to tell everyone to tip more generously. The solution is to improve the wages. And for me as customer the solution is not to raise my tips, but to choose my restaurant based on quality, and not go to the one next door just because it's 20 cents cheaper.

      --
      Assorted stuff I do sometimes: Lemuria.org
    25. Re:Very common by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I forgot for a second how as a non-US citizen, I have an obligation to correct your legally codified social injustices

      Hey, they seem to believe the inverse - why not?

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    26. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If there's a service charge, feel free to refrain from tipping. Tips usually get split between the kitchen/house, the bar, and sometimes other servers, but chefs get paid more than servers anywhere in the world. If you don't think it's right, complain to your fucking legislators, who set the minimum wage. Otherwise, GP's point stands.

    27. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So, in your f'd-up convoluted mindset, because the Great State of Ohio has made a retarded and anti-worker decision, its somehow the responsibility of CUSTOMERS to make up for a worker's salary? WTF are you smoking?

      If businesses paid waitstaff a decent wage, the problem would be solved. As the **AA is finding out, its not the customer's fault you bought into a f'ed up business model.

    28. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll see your "American way", and raise you the "Japanese way", which is "if you work for a business, you get paid your hourly wage per hour, and that's it". At no point in this country am I (as a customer) expected to give *any* member of staff *any* amount of money for doing their job, and that's the way I like it.

      I've heard that when misguided Americans try and tip in Japan, it usually results in restaurant staff having to chase them down the road to give them the money back, because they think they forgot their change or something.

      And yes, I'm not Japanese (I'm British, and thankfully except for restaurants, cafes and a couple of other edge cases tipping has pretty much died out where I come from) but I do live in Japan.

    29. Re:Very common by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      I bet he's a waiter in another life.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    30. Re:Very common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The exception to federal minimum wage for tipped employees only applies when their tipped income is more than the federal minimum wage. If their income is less than the federal minimum wage, the employer is responsible for making up the difference. But don't let facts interrupt your rant.

  11. Bussiness 101 by Moheeheeko · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "For the first 100 people" would have been a good stipulation on that groupon. That would actually serve the purpose of the offer. The first 100 would get cheap cupcakes sure, but the following of people after the first 100 would likely buy cupcakes anyway without the coupon because of the "well, im here, might as well" attitude a lot of people have.

    1. Re:Bussiness 101 by residieu · · Score: 1

      No, the next 100 wouldn't buy cupcakes because they'd be pissed. They paid for a discount coupon, they're not going to buy cupcakes without it.

    2. Re:Bussiness 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2

      "For the first 100 people" would have been a good stipulation on that groupon. That would actually serve the purpose of the offer. The first 100 would get cheap cupcakes sure, but the following of people after the first 100 would likely buy cupcakes anyway without the coupon because of the "well, im here, might as well" attitude a lot of people have.

      I don't think you understand how groupon works. They don't go in to the store to buy the coupon. Everyone who comes after the first 100/200/1000 would just be like "oh, i can't buy a coupon.. oh well, " and never think about the vendor again. and that's if they don't harbor some grudge.

      - too lazy to sign in

    3. Re:Bussiness 101 by MozeeToby · · Score: 2

      You should probably look up how Groupon (and the other coupon deal sites) work. Customers purchase a coupon from the Groupon website, which is then redeemed at the retailer or restaurant. So, if the deal is "$20 worth of steak for $10", the customer pays Groupon $10, prints out the coupon, goes to the market, and redeems the coupon for $20 worth of steak.

      What you can do, is tell Groupon to only sell X number of coupons. But then, that doesn't drive customers to your store the way your thinking above does. People would simply go to Groupon, see that it's sold out, and never think about it again.

    4. Re:Bussiness 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why would you pay Groupon $10 to get $10 off $20?

    5. Re:Bussiness 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In this example, you pay Groupon $10 for a coupon that you exchange at the restaurant for $20 of steak. No money is exchanged at the restaurant. The restaurant gets their cut of the $10 from Groupon directly.

    6. Re:Bussiness 101 by Digz · · Score: 1

      You don't. You pay Groupon $10 for a $20 off gift certificate, and so forth depending on the particular deal.

      --
      SYS 64738
    7. Re:Bussiness 101 by TheLink · · Score: 1

      What you can do instead of trying to sell 102k cupcakes is to spread out multiple 1000 cupcake offers over a period of months.

      The first way gives you worldwide publicity but probably a lot more heartburn and unhappy customers.

      The second way gives you publicity in a better controlled manner. Your cashflow would also be under control.

      I'm not sure which way would give you more new long-term customers. But I'd prefer the second less stressful approach.

      --
    8. Re:Bussiness 101 by Amouth · · Score: 1

      because you only pay once.. aka .. you prepay through Groupon and only pay 10$ for a 20$ good/service. then you go Redeem your already paid for service.

      Companies that lose vast amounts of money with Groupon can't do math - at most i'd ever do with them would be to drop prices to my cost or just over the cost. People are looking for deals - and zero markup is a deal and doesn't hurt anyone. Undercutting your costs gives a false sense of value to a good/service and would just make the customer think your normal prices are marked up even more.

      --
      '...if only "Jumping to a Conclusion" was an event in the Olympics.'
    9. Re:Bussiness 101 by Stewie241 · · Score: 1

      You pay $10 and you get a $20 voucher to spend at the store. It is essentially half price.

    10. Re:Bussiness 101 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're missing the other key elements that can hurt businesses in the short term. Groupon receives $10 from customer. Groupon keeps half. The $5 is then spread out in payments over a few months' time, I've heard 3 payments in six months, I've heard 90 days, I'm not sure exactly what the specs are. So if you sell 1200 $20 steak dinner coupons, Groupon is going to make $6000 off of you, then you get a check now, a check later, and another check later. If all the customers redeem their Groupons within the amount of time between check one and check two, you're out the wholesale costs of 1200 steak dinners and all you have is that first fractional check from Groupon to show for it. If the check from Groupon is a third of it, you've got $2000 to buy 1200 steaks. If you want repeat business you keep buying the $3 wholesale steaks and swallow the loss for now. If you don't care about repeat business you buy the $1.50 steaks and quality suffers. As a SMALL business owner this will be the question keeping you up at night. This is why when The Gap or Old Navy or Wendy's run a Groupon, they don't cap it. They can afford to float the wholesale costs for awhile. They have existing inventory that doesn't go stale in a few hours or days. They have a supply chain. As a small business owner, what do you have? Sam's Club? Costco? Sysco? That's not cost-effective enough to keep up with the demands of a hot Groupon that people want to redeem right away.

      That brings me to the other thing, some Groupons have expiration dates a year away. So those 1200 coupons might not all show up in the first week or month. You might have a sudden rush of 300 customers 12 months from the sale so suddenly you need to have waitstaff on call, or you need to have an emergency meat delivery company ready to bring you a pallet of porterhouse. The costs of a sudden need for a convenient solution can be enormous because you never know when the Groupon customer will show up, or how many at one time.

    11. Re:Bussiness 101 by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      I suppose one way to prevent a mess like that is to put a future date on coupons meaning that if a promo go live on Groupon on Monday for a day the first X numbers of buyers can cash their coupons on Monday. The next group of buyers are getting a coupons that only valid say starting on Tuesday until you reached the limit of what you want to invest in this loss leader. But really by doing it this way you don't need more staff you don't need to pay overtime so your loss margin if any become negligible. You might even turn up a tidy profit provided you price it right and you wont piss off your regular customers by neglecting them.

    12. Re:Bussiness 101 by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      With the second method you can try it once or twice without committing too much and tweak the numbers based on previous results.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  12. She's doing it wrong. by liquidweaver · · Score: 4, Funny

    She should take a hint from KFC, not fulfill the promise, and just delay it in courts until it turns into a $3 coupon years later that requires OCD record keeping to capitalize on.

    Oh wait, this is a small business, those don't hold voting rights in our corporatocracy.

    --
    mov ah, 4ch
    int 21h
    1. Re:She's doing it wrong. by drb226 · · Score: 3

      Slashdot is in desperate need of the "sad, and yet funny, and yet so disturbingly true" moderation vote, if only for this comment.

  13. Groupon sales rep by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if the Groupon sales rep advised her to put a limit on the number of people that might take up the offer.

    In fact, it is surprising that having a limit on the number of people that can take up the offer isn't the default. But wait ... the more people that take up the offer, the more money Groupon (and probably the sales rep) makes ...

    1. Re:Groupon sales rep by Shazback · · Score: 1

      Pretty sure the Groupon sales rep didn't, and even discouraged her from taking up that option saying that if the deal was limited to too few customers they wouldn't run it.

      Sadly, Groupon doesn't care about the businesses that run the deals. As they continue to burn through their goodwill, promising "exposure" to a "new audience" that never translates into long-term sales increases, they'll eventually find it harder to con businesses into stupid deals. About that time, their stock will tank and they'll go bankrupt, exposing them for the Ponzi scheme they are.

  14. She protests too much by bugs2squash · · Score: 0

    even with the discount it's $10 for 13 cakes that have a total ingredient cost of, I would guess, less than a couple of dollars. It seems like she should be able to make money on a deal like that, especially as she does not have to worry about the cakes going stale waiting for a sale. Also, she now has reached 8500 new customers, which was presumably the point of the whole thing. I suspect her business mistake is going into a venture where you have to sell a $2 cupcake, even when made in bulk, just to break even.

    --
    Nullius in verba
    1. Re:She protests too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      there is a lot more overhead than just the cost of ingredients. namely the cost of staff, utilities...etc.

      that being said. groupon is such an obviously bad idea for small businesses to get involved in. people are cheap and if you give them a coupon they will flock towards the savings... but that's basically it. very few people think "wow what a cheap bunch of cupcakes, i'm going to buy a bunch of cookies with my savings!" they instead just take their cheap cupcakes and gtfo and instead of coming back they just follow the next cheap internet coupon.

    2. Re:She protests too much by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      even with the discount it's $10 for 13 cakes that have a total ingredient cost of, I would guess, less than a couple of dollars. It seems like she should be able to make money on a deal like that, especially as she does not have to worry about the cakes going stale waiting for a sale. Also, she now has reached 8500 new customers, which was presumably the point of the whole thing. I suspect her business mistake is going into a venture where you have to sell a $2 cupcake, even when made in bulk, just to break even.

      - Plus cost of labor (perhaps overtime?)
      - Plus cost of gas + electricity + whatever to continuously pump out a huge order
      - Plus cost of shipping (or whatever)
      - Plus the delay you'll face making your regular orders, which might lose you customers

      There's more to a thing than the some of the components: whether it's a baked good's ingredients or a iPhone's transistors.

    3. Re:She protests too much by Mashiki · · Score: 1

      What I found funny was her selling a dozen cupcakes for $40. What? Huh? Holy shit, apparently I'm in the wrong market. I do some off time work at a friends bakery every few weeks, and she sells a dozen cupcakes in a variety of types for between $3 and 5.

      I'm guessing these are luxury cupcakes, made from pickled droppings of some 30 year old bear.

      --
      Om, nomnomnom...
    4. Re:She protests too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think your business mistake is assuming she owns slaves and her ovens are fired by unicorn farts.

    5. Re:She protests too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      $3/cupcake is pretty normal. Possibly more if you want really fancy decorations (like for weddings, etc).

      Also, I heartily laugh at these part time bakers. Poor lady had to come in at 3 a.m.. hah! My wife regularly starts bakes at midnight!

    6. Re:She protests too much by kramerd · · Score: 1

      Its much closer to $50 a dozen. Depending on the exchange rate, somewhere between 48 and 56. ON the other ohand, with all of the taxes in the UK, along with the cost of retail space, it is entirely possible that a buck apiece is reasonable there, with a 4-10% profit margin.

    7. Re:She protests too much by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 1

      even with the discount it's $10 for 13 cakes that have a total ingredient cost of, I would guess, less than a couple of dollars. It seems like she should be able to make money on a deal like that, especially as she does not have to worry about the cakes going stale waiting for a sale. Also, she now has reached 8500 new customers, which was presumably the point of the whole thing. I suspect her business mistake is going into a venture where you have to sell a $2 cupcake, even when made in bulk, just to break even.

      Or it could be the new business strategy:

      1: Gain the notice of 8500 new customers with a major discount.
      2: Gain the notice of everybody else with a news story about how screwed you were by GroupOn.
      3: PROFIT!

      --
      "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    8. Re:She protests too much by ledow · · Score: 1

      If you're not taking all that into account, per cake, when you make them and price them, then you're NOT doing business. You're playing at business. That's a sort of school-yard sale way of running a business - fine for entertainment and keeping you busy, worthless for a business that employs staff and has overheads.

      And most of that stuff scales linearly or better (except possibly overtime, but then more staff would have counter-acted that presumably) - if the oven stays hot, it uses less gas per cake than if it keeps cooling, if you're making a thousand cakes you can bulk-buy the ingredients, etc. Worst that happens is some sort of physical limit (can't fit that many cakes in the oven, and not practical to buy a new oven for a one-off mistake) but she's already taking on extra staff to fulfil the orders so that's probably not the bottleneck.

      Seriously, if you're not pricing your goods/services to make about 50% profit at least with EVERYTHING taken into account (i.e. down to the last pinch of sugar and kJ of gas), you're really not doing business so much as making a living for yourself (where profit is, basically, optional). In that case, you SHOULDN'T be using Groupon or even placing an advert without knowing that because you'll be expected to be a business when the new customers roll in.

      The only problems I would see would be time (she's not complaining that she COULDN'T get them done in time, just that it was hard and she lost money), capacity (ovens, ingredients, working space, etc., none of which she really states as the reason she can't fulfil an order) and staff training (How long do you need to learn how to cook cupcakes en masse? A day? What effect does a production-line system where one person handles only one job have on your production that you couldn't do before?). But if you normally make a profit on the odd cupcake here and there, then you should make a LOT more profit on thousands of guaranteed orders with only the minimum of upheaval in comparison.

      You can either whine about it, or get out in the van at 4am that day, bulk-buy the damn ingredients and draft in every relative and friend you have to help, and enjoy a percentage of 8,500 new, satisfied customers.

      Unless, of course, you're really not that bright at this "making money" thing - and are stupid enough to give away a basically unlimited license to people to produce cake orders at a loss for yourself. I have about as much sympathy as I do when one of the big supermarkets has to cancel a special offer because they realise that customers can actually combine offers, take advantage, etc. and come out with profit at the store's expense. None.

      Ignoring GroupOn (because the horror stories abound, and all of them are down to stupidity of these people when they deal with the GroupOn salesmen and sign the contract): If her CAKES were suddenly wonderful and popular overnight and people were queueing out the door for them (rather than just a special offer), she would have still made a loss. That's an idiotic way to run your business whether you ever expect it to happen or not. Every cake, promotional or not, should make a profit and NEVER a loss. Or your business is better off JUST NOT MAKING THEM even in small batches. If it doesn't scale, you're doing something wrong and failing to adjust to the situation - almost everything profitable scales nicely.

    9. Re:She protests too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      even with the discount it's $10 for 13 cakes that have a total ingredient cost of, I would guess, less than a couple of dollars. It seems like she should be able to make money on a deal like that, especially as she does not have to worry about the cakes going stale waiting for a sale. Also, she now has reached 8500 new customers, which was presumably the point of the whole thing. I suspect her business mistake is going into a venture where you have to sell a $2 cupcake, even when made in bulk, just to break even.

      The way groupon works for a $10 Item. the bakery gets $5 and groupon gets $5. So their share is $42500 -minus taxes worth of income.

      Yes, it will cost them money, but they can improve economies of scale. The bakery can buy bulk flour and sugar on the cheap. It will cost more in Labor than anything but if you buy $20 grand worth of flour and sugar then you have more than you need for that amount of cupcakes and you can get enough for other projects at the bakery. And the job is to upsell those 8500 orders for cookies, bread, cakes, etc. or just hand them a $2 off coupon and you might get a 20% return of new customers from the coupon.

    10. Re:She protests too much by Dynedain · · Score: 1

      Seriously, if you're not pricing your goods/services to make about 50% profit at least with EVERYTHING taken into account

      You missed the point where the Groupon deal was for 75% off. When the discount is higher than your profit margin (not unusual for limited run loss-leaders to get people into the store) it's pretty much impossible to make money on that item. She is losing money because she's abiding by the agreement she gave her customers, not her normal rates. I think it's impressive she's holding up her end of the bargain even though she made a mistake. She should be commended for that and for setting a good example of customer care.

      Her mistake was in assuming that Groupon coupons would have the same kind of low use rate that printed coupons do. Printed coupons serve mainly as advertising, and if a few people use them, that's a minor overhead. Groupon deals on the other hand have really high use rates.

      --
      I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    11. Re:She protests too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idiocy with regards to cost analysis in the restaurant business is pervasive enough that I will be adding it to my business card. These (*ahem*) potential clients seem to be lucky if they have any idea of what they're selling or what it costs; profitability is as far beyond them as flying is to a goldfish.

    12. Re:She protests too much by datavirtue · · Score: 1

      What is this "buying ingredients in bulk" tripe? She already does that. You don't get significant extra discounts for buying a whole lot more ingredients. It is food that is traded on a global market like anything else of real value, it only gets so cheap. Restaurant chains can work deals where they get kick-backs at the end of year if they purchase a certain amount during the year, but there isn't a novel formula where you can just get a better deal because you buy a lot. Food is gold! Do you expect a better deal if you buy many many ounces of gold?

      --
      I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
    13. Re:She protests too much by jimicus · · Score: 1

      You'd be amazed (actually you probably wouldn't) at the number of small businesses that are badly run - either because the owner doesn't really want anything more than a job (and so doesn't really plan for making it into a real business that can stand on its own feet) or because the owner simply doesn't know how.

    14. Re:She protests too much by ledow · · Score: 1

      No, but your transport costs would drop (one HUGE transaction compared to many little).

      A smaller baker in the UK probably gets their ingredients from the local "cash and carry" that *DO* offer discounts for bulk, and very small bakers that have only small custom normally might well not buy enough to take advantage of even USING one of those places (whereas someone making 8500 orders probably WOULD).

      Not *everything* would reduce prices in bulk but certainly there will almost always be a small saving in terms of economy along the way if you buying HUNDREDS of times more than your usual method (e.g. hiring a fecking van for the afternoon to get all the ingredients in one go rather than taking your normal car / whatever back and forth ten times). And if you can't find a discount in bulk, you really need to learn how to source your raw materials.

    15. Re:She protests too much by kannibal_klown · · Score: 1

      As someone else mentioned: it was a 75%-off coupon.

      Such things are usually for loss-leaders, meaning you're willing to give out a coupon (or have a sale) for something that you sell at a loss... in hopes that you either win a customer or while they're buying the cheap-item they're buying more.

      VERY OFTEN, in retail people just take advantage of the loss-leaders... they come to the store just for that thing and are never heard from again until another huge sale. Sure, you win some customers but not everyone... and that's even when the potential customers are just in walking distance to your store.

      That's the thing here... 75% is a enough off that I'd almost bet it would be a loss-leader.

      Sure, you can make a dozen cup-cakes with pre-made mix and basic frosting for dirt cheap. But bakeries usually use higher quality... even at bulk I could see 13 fancy cupcakes costing more than $10 USD to make (between ingredients + labor + incidentals). Especially when have to work people overtime.

      So I'm not surprised it was at a loss. Meanwhile, how many of the X-thousand "customers" do you think she really won over? Especially anon-Internet shoppers that would probably never visit the place again.

    16. Re:She protests too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, they are luxury as in "gourmet." Basically, higher quality ingredients used and *generally* more effort/skill into making them (sometimes requiring more time to cook for example). She stated that it cost her about £10 (~15.65) dollars to make a dozen (things like real chocolate is expensive) while selling it for £26 (~$40). Really, that's only a bit over 2x in profit which isn't all that much for a food product because you have to factor in the low sales volume, labor, utilities, rent, throwaways due to short shelf life and the profit margin is ALOT smaller then it looks.

    17. Re:She protests too much by Stormtrooper42 · · Score: 1

      I bet they were selling like cupcakes.
      Oh wait...

    18. Re:She protests too much by asdf7890 · · Score: 1

      So I'm not surprised it was at a loss. Meanwhile, how many of the X-thousand "customers" do you think she really won over? Especially anon-Internet shoppers that would probably never visit the place again.

      Very few. This all smacks of the same rubbish banded about in the run up to the first major dot-bomb bust: people giving away the shirts off their own backs to draw people in because eyeball count, get them in and eventually you'll make back what you've lost. Only for most businesses they simply doesn't happen. Too many are getting desperate and jumping in deeper than they should in the hope that they'll be one of the lucky ones, and there are going to be fwer lucky ones this time around: many of the markets already have long-standing 400lb gorillas manning the walls, and others require people to be willing to pony up for something new and exciting which with people being careful because of the current economic state (or being destitute because of the current economic state!) and the Internet not being novel and newly exciting to most people, is not likely to happen en mass.

    19. Re:She protests too much by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Ever been to London. The prices are crazy high on everything it like New York but cleaner and a hell of a lot more polite.

    20. Re:She protests too much by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      The lost leader is marketing tactic that everybody know so a lot customers are now doing the get in get the deal and get out before you end up buying something else well above market value. Take Wal-Mart they had a great deal on delissio garlic bread pizza recently. I fulled the freezer with that stuff and it was a get in and get out kind of visit you hang around a bit I guarantee that you will impulse buy something else. Rule number one of the savvy shopper is to never buy something when you don't know the average market price.

    21. Re:She protests too much by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      That why 9 out of 10 new business fail in the first year. You need and will usually fail at least a few times in business before you strike it big.

    22. Re:She protests too much by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it not like printing 5000 mail flyers that 99% of peoples will throw away without more than a look when a customer buy a Groupon deal he or she is making a conscious choice and will cash it in at a really high rate.

    23. Re:She protests too much by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      The bakery can buy bulk flour and sugar on the cheap. It will cost more in Labor than anything but if you buy $20 grand worth of flour and sugar then you have more than you need for that amount of cupcakes and you can get enough for other projects at the bakery.

      One, you wouldn't get a 75% discount no matter how much you buy.

      Two, even if you did, you wouldn't get 75% off your other costs - rent, wages, power.

      Three, you'd have to find somewhere to store it.

      Four, it has a limited shelf life.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  15. Lucille Ball in the candy factory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I fully expect several Hollywood creative teams have jumped on this piece and are working on the 2011 version as we speak.

    With the usual creative license, i.e. each Groupon order is individually printed from an inkjet printer perched on a rather high table so they can fall to the floor around the harried shopkeeper and bakers.

  16. Groupon's fault by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't see how Groupon can be considered long term viable, if this is the kind of press they're getting. This lady will never be doing that again, and she's going to go to her local chamber of commerce meetings and say, "I had a bad experience with Groupon". Any salesperson from Groupon will have an uphill battle selling to anyone in that area again.

    How hard would it be for Groupon to make the default limit be a small number? If the business selects a large number with a large discount, then their forms could ask, "Can you really service this number of customers over this time?"

    I know it's easy to blame the baker for this mistake, it's not a viable business strategy to kill your customers. Customers are supposed to be bled slowly, so that you can bleed them some more tomorrow.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Groupon's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Then again, a lot of people will hear about her store--and that she did her best to fulfill it.

      Granted, the limit should have been placed.

    2. Re:Groupon's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      I don't see how Groupon can be considered long term viable

      it isn't - their financials are said to be extremely sketchy and very "growth-oriented" (aka ponzi-esque)

    3. Re:Groupon's fault by caladine · · Score: 2

      I don't see how Groupon can be considered long term viable, if this is the kind of press they're getting.

      Additionally, I imagine there are quite a few people like me out there who only use groupons with businesses I already patrionize regularly. I find myself waiting for the next groupon to show up before purchasing what I would have gotten without it anyway. Great for Groupon, but not so great for the business in question. Doesn't much sound like a sustainable model to me.

    4. Re:Groupon's fault by Bill+Dimm · · Score: 1

      How hard would it be for Groupon to make the default limit be a small number? If the business selects a large number with a large discount, then their forms could ask, "Can you really service this number of customers over this time?"

      If they had a default limit of 100 customers, Groupon would have made 85 times less money on this deal than they did (100 customer instead of 8,500). In other words, the bad press has to cost them 85 businesses just to eat up the profit they made on this one.

      Regarding the press that they're getting, I would say it breaks down three ways:
      1) Some businesses - I'll never do Groupon because of this.
      2) Other businesses - She was an idiot and I'm not, so it will work for me. Look at all those customers Groupon can deliver!
      3) Consumers - Prices on Groupon are so good that businesses are losing money selling to me. Awesome deal for me! I need to do more Groupon.

    5. Re:Groupon's fault by sjames · · Score: 1

      The sad thing is, Groupon could absolutely make this viable for the businesses or at least get rid of the bad press. Instead of their current policy of talking the business into the poorhouse if they can, they should be helping them choose deals that are at worst break even (that is, in the case where grouponer buys exactly the groupon item and never returns) and where things are staggered enough that they don't exceed their capacity.

      What it comes down to though is that that would limit the offers too much since many/most small businesses don't make 50 points in the first place. Groupon would have to accept 25% or so to have a lot of viable offers, but they don't want to do that.

    6. Re:Groupon's fault by KahabutDieDrake · · Score: 1

      Groupons model is awesome... for groupon. It makes the customers of business X customers of Groupon instead. And the best part is, Business X paid Groupon for the opportunity to steal their own customers.

    7. Re:Groupon's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not groupon's job to run your business for you. They are a tool. They provide means to limit your obligation to whatever you need to meet your goals, from taking a reduced profit to breaking even or taking a loss and writing it off as advertising.

      If the business printed a bunch of paper coupons and distributed them at an event, would you be calling for kinko's to be responsible for allowing them to print so many copies?

      Good lord.

    8. Re:Groupon's fault by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's probably why Groupon decided to back off from doing an IPO, IIRC. It *isn't* sustainable.

  17. You'll pay £3 at a supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You'll pay £3 at a supermarket for a cupcake.

    1. Re:You'll pay £3 at a supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll pay £3 at a supermarket for a cupcake.

      No, I'll pay $2 for 6 at a supermarket.

    2. Re:You'll pay £3 at a supermarket by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Depends on the cupcake. 2 Tesco pink cupcakes cost £3. 6 Tesco value cost £3.

      I'm sure you can spend £3 on a single cupcake at Waitrose.

    3. Re:You'll pay £3 at a supermarket by arkane1234 · · Score: 2

      No, the supermarket sells a cupcake for $4 for 4. (/sarcasm)

      How many supermarkets are there, and how could they all be the same?

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
  18. expensive cupcakes by MasaMuneCyrus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    £26 per bakers dozen cupcakes!? Is this a normal price? That's $40! Are these normal prices in London?!

    1. Re:expensive cupcakes by spire3661 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Its this new metropolitan area fad of upscale cupcake stores. Ive had a few 'gourmet' cupcakes from one in Laguna Beach. It was ok, but not worth the $4 i paid for it and I'd never go back.

      --
      Good-bye
    2. Re:expensive cupcakes by AngryDeuce · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Two pounds a piece? Four dollars a cupcake??

      Jesus Christ, do people really have that kind of disposable cash laying around these days? They'd better be some life-altering cupcakes for that price.

    3. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Erm... Yes. Your problem that the $ is such a weak currency.

    4. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      That's a normal price anywhere for high-end premium cupcakes. These aren't the dry little half-frosted cupcakes you remember from elementary school, these are basically scaled-down high-end wedding cakes that sell for $3-6 each individually, with a small volume discount. It's a trend that started with the Magnolia Bakery in New York City and went nationwide when the characters on HBO's "Sex in The City" raved about Magnolia. Every decent-size city in America has several cupcake shops these days, it's hard to throw a rock without hitting one. I can't believe you haven't seen them.

    5. Re:expensive cupcakes by X0563511 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yea, I was thinking the same thing.

      Oh look, Italy is out of money! (continues eating $5 cupcakes)

      --
      For large sets, this will be our guide even unto death, for the LORD will work for each type of data it is applied to...
    6. Re:expensive cupcakes by rjstanford · · Score: 3, Informative

      As a general real-world rule of thumb, a convenience item that would cost you $10 in a large US city will cost you £10 in a British one. Its about buying power, not nominal currency exchange rates.

      --
      You're special forces then? That's great! I just love your olympics!
    7. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you people live that you are not seeing the cupcake craze and the $3-$4 price tag. This ain't some Betty Crocker mix with some cheap icing, these are gourmet cakes from scratch with all kinds of specialty toppings.

      FYI - Pie is the next fad that is rising.

    8. Re:expensive cupcakes by Grizzley9 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yea, I was thinking the same thing.

      Oh look, Italy is out of money! (continues eating $5 cupcakes)

      Correction: Italy's government is out of money. Spending your cash in the market place actually helps the economy no matter the ridiculous price of the cupcake.

    9. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Two pounds a piece? Four dollars a cupcake??

      Jesus Christ, do people really have that kind of disposable cash laying around these days? They'd better be some life-altering cupcakes for that price.

      Or at least mind-altering.

    10. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them eat (cup)cakes.

    11. Re:expensive cupcakes by jank1887 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      you say that, yet we had people decide over the course of a couple years that a $0.50 cup of coffee was now worth $3.95. Of course they'll pay $5 for a cupcake.

    12. Re:expensive cupcakes by sourcerror · · Score: 4, Informative

      I can buy pretty fine cake for $1, but I live in Eastern Europe.

    13. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Agree with parent: Italy has *shitloads* of money. They're just not giving it to their government.

    14. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Yeah, they have one in Gainesville, FL. It has a Sanskrit name, Sarkara, to make you feel more educated and karmic as you spend three dollars and something for a dry cupcake that ought to cost cents. It's *exactly* the same story as with coffee a few years ago: a cup of joe that used to cost cents at a diner or lunch counter in the 80's or before now costs dollars at Starbucks or Your Favorite Local Coffee Store (if you believe that purchasing a parity product at obscenely inflated prices from a "local" merchant as opposed to a chain is somehow morally superior: enjoy handing your money over for frivolities at an accelerated rate regardless). Interestingly, a coffee at the local coffee shop (Volta) around the corner from Sarkara cupcakes cost, to the penny, exactly the same: it's almost as if you're actually purchasing a token foodstuff of purely symbolic value to justify spending time in a place Other Than Home with wifi access, and the merchants are in pricing competition over that time, not over the token food item.

    15. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correction: spending ridiculous money on cupcakes actually helps the vendor of said cupcakes, not necessarily anyone else in the economy.

      For example, the owner of the business might be from Dubai and spend money in London and Indonesia. The actual impact on your local economy might be utterly negligible.

      Higher-priced cupcakes don't mean more local jobs, better working conditions or hours, and they certainly don't mean better salaries for local workers

    16. Re:expensive cupcakes by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Jesus Christ, do people really have that kind of disposable cash laying around these days? T

      Umm... The 1% ers do. I saw a promo for one of those pawn store shows where a guy bought a diamond dog collar - for his dog - for $4,500.

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    17. Re:expensive cupcakes by DigitalGoetz · · Score: 2

      To be fair, the 99% over this last decade spent a lot of their money getting these overpriced snacks/drinks while filling the coffers of the 1%.

    18. Re:expensive cupcakes by Mister+Whirly · · Score: 1

      I live in a real world where paying $4 for a cupcake is something I would never do. But now I am starting to think IT is the wrong business to be in, and maybe I should start baking cupcakes to sell for $4 if other people are willing to pay that much.

      --
      "But this one goes to 11!"
    19. Re:expensive cupcakes by jimicus · · Score: 4, Informative

      Depends on the cupcake.

      If you're buying a basic, churned-out-by-the-thousand cupcake from a cheap high-street bakery like Greggs (or for that matter from the supermarket) you will pay 50p-£1.

      But there is also a market for a much fancier cake. Where it's made with butter rather than cheap cooking fat, where the chocolate is real, high-quality chocolate rather than cheap cooking stuff, where the flavouring is essence rather than artificial flavouring, where the decorating is done by hand and includes fancy shapes made out of florist paste as well as a generous topping of buttercream.

      We're talking the sort of thing you could happily serve to guests at your wedding. The sort of thing that celebrities you see in glossy magazines (but would rather see on milk cartons, if you're in the US) buy. Not the sort of thing you pick up for a cheap sugar rush. These will sell for about £2-3 each.

    20. Re:expensive cupcakes by D'Sphitz · · Score: 3, Funny

      Two pounds a piece? Four dollars a cupcake??

      Jesus Christ, do people really have that kind of disposable cash laying around these days?

      Ask Starbucks et al and their $4+ coffee

    21. Re:expensive cupcakes by ph0rk · · Score: 2

      If by $3.95 you mean $1.50 then perhaps. $2 on the outside, and that's overpriced.

      The $3+ drinks are usually made with milk and/or flavor and espresso. Drip coffee is still cheap. Yes, even at big chain coffee shops. If you don't want to pay that much, don't buy expensive fancy drinks.

      If I could still find $.50 drip coffee, I imagine it would taste like crap.

      (Unless, of course, you live in a large metro where prices are higher, but that's all your fault).

      --
      semantics are everything!
    22. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If I am paying that much for a cupcake, there better be free pussy and weed in it...just sayin'.

    23. Re:expensive cupcakes by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

      Wish I had mod points. (up)

    24. Re:expensive cupcakes by tripleevenfall · · Score: 0

      Correction: Italy's government is out of money. Spending your cash in the market place actually helps the economy no matter the ridiculous price of the cupcake.

      Except the government will confiscate an even greater amount of this cash in the future, to continue free-spending, and no one will be better as a result.

    25. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

      You really have no idea what running a business entails do you. The INGREDIENTS for a cupcake would cost cents, then add the labor, then add the rent, add the cost of the nice environment tables chairs whatnot, add the labor involved in managing both the bakery personnel and the service/sales staff as well as their benefits and insurance, and while I've mentioned it, insurance against idiots slipping and falling on a cupcake they dropped and suing, don't forget all of the overhead involved in running an office and paying for all those pennies worth of raw materials, balancing the books, advertising, There are many more costs that I haven't listed but I think you might be getting the point.

      Just because you can make a cupcake for "cents" at home on your time with your equipment, by paying nothing for anything but ingredients DOSEN'T mean that you could do that as a business and stay in business and employ people.

    26. Re:expensive cupcakes by Tharsman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In these case they do. These are baked same day, thats part of the "gourmet" deal. The specfic article seems to list the woman managing the store as the owner too, so yea it seems to be entirely local.

      With the business being local, it means all the luxuries that business owner endulges in, will spread money (building new home? gardner? restaurants? buying a car? etc.)

    27. Re:expensive cupcakes by eepok · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Are you talking about "Sprinkles"? There's one in Newport Beach and my partner and I went there, knowing we'd be wasting our money, to buy their cupcakes and make up our minds on the value of their boutique pastries. We spent $39 on a dozen assorted.

      Our conclusions? The cake is no better than a correctly prepared Betty Crocker mix and the icing, while pretty, comes way too thick and very simple in flavor.

      Don't get me wrong. I'm not a "gourmet" hunter who thinks he can tell a $50 bottle of wine from a bottle of two-buck-Chuck. In fact, I will admit bias against these boutique places that give MASSIVE price mark-ups to otherwise cheap food under the banner of "gourmet" or "artisinal" (don't get me started on the "gourmet tamales" they sell at my local farmer's market...). So when I say a flavor is "simple", I'm saying it's nothing special that would justify such a massive cost increase.

      Summary: Spending $39 on a dozen cupcakes was a waste of money. People who pay so much for a simple pastry are stupid (self included) and those who think they're eating something with amazing flavor and tastably high quality have been fooled.

    28. Re:expensive cupcakes by cygnwolf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No, but it does mean that I'm not going to pay $4 for the name brand on a cupcake when I could get the same cupcake for $0.89 at the no frills mom and pop bakery around the corner from my house except that it came in a plain paper cup.

      --
      Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
    29. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bullshit.

      Your made up scenario is far less likely than the realities you deny.

      Furthermore, paying for locally made goods ALWAYS causes local employment, peroid.

    30. Re:expensive cupcakes by b0bby · · Score: 1

      I think that really over the course of a couple of years people went from a $0.50 cup of coffee to a $3.95 coffee flavored milkshake...

    31. Re:expensive cupcakes by nedlohs · · Score: 4, Interesting

      If you are paying such prices for the shitty brewed coffee you were getting at a lunch counter, then yes you are being an idiot and getting ripped off.

      But an esspresso machine costs significantly more both in initial cost and in maintenance costs than a brewing machine. It also requires more training to use (though Starbucks seems to skip that bit). It's also significantly slower (so you need more staff hours to make the same amount of coffee).

      Of course Starbucks coffee is crap, though orders of magnitude better than the swill that passes for brewed coffee (and of course Starbucks does brewed coffee too - but why would you go there for that???)

      And cupcakes have none of that. A "gourmet" cupcake is made in exactly the same oven with exactly the same ingredients as a regular cupcake...

    32. Re:expensive cupcakes by teg · · Score: 1

      I can buy pretty fine cake for $1, but I live in Eastern Europe.

      While here, in Norway, $4 is just 50% more than a small, cheap, shrink wrapped muffin bought at a cheap grocery store...

    33. Re:expensive cupcakes by blair1q · · Score: 1

      Two words:

      Star
      bucks.

    34. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What Starbucks are you're going to that charges $3.95 for a standard cup (8 oz) of drip coffee? I get a 20 oz drip coffee for $2.25, so the 8 oz will quite a bit less.

      OOOHH, you meant more than a cup, and not drip but something like a Latte or Espresso, something that will cost you quite a bit more than $0.50 pretty much anywhere in the US.

    35. Re:expensive cupcakes by eepok · · Score: 1

      Yes and no. People will pay $3.95 for a coffee with the potential of being a high-maintenance tool (Tall soy mocha latte with almond sweetener and lightly iced). People are still not willing to pay more than $2 for a large cup of black coffee "with the sugar and cream behind you on the counter".

      Of course, the "regular coffee" from these chain barrista places typically taste like

    36. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are cupcakes addictive?

    37. Re:expensive cupcakes by eepok · · Score: 2

      continued...

      Of course, the "regular coffee" from these chain barrista places typically taste like cigarette ashes because they keep the same pot on high heat for 5 hours out of the day.

    38. Re:expensive cupcakes by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      How did you find out Jonny Ive bought a cupcake on Laguna Beach, are you close friends? Better inform macrumours of this scoop. Oh wait, you meant 'I've'.

    39. Re:expensive cupcakes by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Or you can go somewhere like Waitrose and get better quality for not that much more money. Certainly not £3 a cupcake - I know Waitrose have a reputation but it's not that expensive.

    40. Re:expensive cupcakes by pkinetics · · Score: 1

      If I am paying that much for a cupcake, there better be free pussy and weed in it...just sayin'.

      I now have a name for a cupcake shop... Pussy and Weed

    41. Re:expensive cupcakes by scottbomb · · Score: 4, Funny

      You should see what they pay for gasoline.

    42. Re:expensive cupcakes by dondelelcaro · · Score: 5, Insightful

      A "gourmet" cupcake is made in exactly the same oven with exactly the same ingredients as a regular cupcake...

      Just like a computer contains the same silicon and rare elements as any other computer, the devil is in how they're assembled and put together, and the skill with which someone makes them. A "working" program is made in exactly the same compiler with exactly the same syntactical constraints as a segfaulting program

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    43. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seriously? I make 30k a year and I regularly spend 8 EUR on espresso + cupcake. It's not that expensive.

    44. Re:expensive cupcakes by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where do you people live that you are not seeing the cupcake craze and the $3-$4 price tag.

      New Orleans.

      I'd not heard of this at all, till this thread...

      Then again, who needs cupcakes, when you can run out here and get a plate of freshly made beignets, and cafe au lait....for a few dollars?

      :)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    45. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not all cupcakes are equal. My sister is getting married, and while trying out different places to get her wedding cake, decided to bring home some of that shop's cupcakes. DEAR GOD, SO DELICIOUS. Then again the chef had been featured on a food network competition specifically for desserts. My point being, cupcakes can be elevated to an airy and delicious art form (even if most of these specialty shops are rip-offs).

    46. Re:expensive cupcakes by Dr_Barnowl · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I quite like their geranium and cherry cupcake. You can even get it in their lunch deal, as I recall.

    47. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you say that, yet we had people decide over the course of a couple years that a $0.50 cup of coffee was now worth $3.95. Of course they'll pay $5 for a cupcake.

      well, there is inflation. In addition, even at Starbuck's a "cup of coffee" is about $2. And finally, to ignore a range of quality in coffee would be idiotic.

    48. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And cupcakes have none of that. A "gourmet" cupcake is made in exactly the same oven with exactly the same ingredients as a regular cupcake...

      LOL, that's the funniest crap I've read all day.
      A properly baked gourmet cupcake from a skilled baker, baked with proper ingredients, will have significantly higher ingredient and labor cost compared to a palm oil and corn syrup mass produced health hazard.

    49. Re:expensive cupcakes by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Does that actually exist?! "Geranium and cherry cupcake" is precisely the sort of thing one would say Waitrose sell if you wanted to take the piss out of them...

      If it does, well, that does sound fairly nice...

    50. Re:expensive cupcakes by eedwardsjr · · Score: 2

      I will sell you a gourmet "." to put between Beach and Are.

    51. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not everyone lives in a city. Not everyone watches HBO or TV shows about women doing stupid things. Not everyone cares about trends. And most of us don't go around throwing rocks in retail areas.

    52. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      My Mom and Pop shop makes the best damn bread on the planet. I pay less than he cost of a "factory" loaf, and can buy it unsliced (so I can make thick slices of freedom toast).

    53. Re:expensive cupcakes by StikyPad · · Score: 1

      There's a bakery here that only sells cupcakes, and they sell for $6/ea regardless of quantity, which works out to $72/doz, so I'd say $40/doz isn't bad. Keep in mind also that these are luxury items, not grocery store fare. It's like comparing the price of a cake from a wedding cake shop to a sheet cake from the grocery store... the prices are going to be highly disparate, but so is the quality.

    54. Re:expensive cupcakes by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 2

      ...do people really have that kind of disposable cash laying around these days?

      How much did you spend on your video card?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    55. Re:expensive cupcakes by petermgreen · · Score: 3, Informative
      --
      note: i'm known as plugwash most places but i screwd up registering that here somehow in the past and now can't register
    56. Re:expensive cupcakes by gujo-odori · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, the coffee you get at Starbucks (or better, Peet's or other Favorite Local Store) is not the coffee you get at a diner or lunch counter. That stuff is the same crap it's always been. What Starbucks did is to offer significantly better coffee than that stuff, plus some coffee-based drinks that people like, good ambiance and (usually) much better service, and they found that people would pay a premium for that.

      Note that I'm not arguing that Starbucks is necessarily good, just that it's much better than the usual crap. I didn't start to experience truly good coffee until I started buying coffee roasted by small, local custom roasters. From there, I went on to home roasting my own coffee. It's much cheaper (5 - 7 dollars a pound for great quality green beans), really interesting, gives me full control over the entire roasting process, and let's me drink the freshest possible coffee. My co-workers love it whenever I bring in some of my home roast for our team coffee machine.

      The diner coffee is probably still cheap, but you get what you pay for. I had no idea how coffee should taste, or how good it can be, until I started drinking locally roasted and home roasted coffee, brewed in a French press.

    57. Re:expensive cupcakes by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. If that were true we could solve all our economic problems by ordering everyone to pay someone else to dig and refill a hole.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    58. Re:expensive cupcakes by Joe+Jay+Bee · · Score: 1

      Thanks for first proving my original point, and secondly for reminding me that that place does sell some bizarre shit :P Next time I need a sugar fix and I'm near there...

    59. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I tell people the same thing about Apple products. Ba dum dum.

    60. Re:expensive cupcakes by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      Quite. The very very simple issue there is that "trickle down economics" and "global marketplace" are mutually exclusive buzzwords. Not that that's particularly relevant to the article, tough.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    61. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A "gourmet" cupcake is made in exactly the same oven with exactly the same ingredients as a regular cupcake...

      Really? You must eat shitty gourmet cupcakes. The cake in "gourmet" ones is usually better prepared (better crumb, more flavorful), but the real difference is the frosting -- the different between real buttercream and a pile of crisco/sugar is huge, and the gap to *good* buttercream even wider.

      Perhaps there are three types of shop -- low cost/quality, high cost/quality, and the places that pretend to be the latter but whose product resembles the former. Those who can't differentiate the last two get what the market thinks they deserve.

    62. Re:expensive cupcakes by nedlohs · · Score: 1

      Sure, it requires someone who is skilled at making said cupcakes. But an oven is an oven (within reason, yes you can have a really crappy oven that can't hold a constant temperature) and a cupcake is a cupcake.

      And note the context of "gourmet" in this case, it's synonymous with "a dry cupcake". In other words it's just a label change without a quality change. Whereas an espresso, even a badly made shitty one, is not the same as a cup of brewed coffee - they are two different beverages.

    63. Re:expensive cupcakes by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      Here in Houston, we have a Sprinkles in the Highland Village shopping area (extremely affluent group of shoppers). Quality stuff at expensive prices. But I agree, Sprinkles is company banking on a fad. Like the whole Beanie Baby thing where entire shops were setup to sell the darn things. If you got in early, you banked serious cash before selling the retail space. Like any fad, it's all about timing when going for the gold.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    64. Re:expensive cupcakes by Phleg · · Score: 1

      The cake is no better than a correctly prepared Betty Crocker mix

      There exists no such thing. FFS, stop putting crap into your body. It's not that hard to mix flour, baking soda, cocoa powder, sugar, eggs, and milk.

      --
      No comment.
    65. Re:expensive cupcakes by DigiShaman · · Score: 1

      I miss the king cake. Nobody, and I mean nobody, does a king cake like New Orleans. The folks in Galveston, TX still can't get it right. No surprise there.

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    66. Re:expensive cupcakes by vegiVamp · · Score: 1

      > made with butter rather than cheap cooking fat,
      The major factor in the list you give. I can't believe someone wouldn't believe it's not butter.

      > where the chocolate is real, high-quality chocolate rather than cheap cooking stuff,
      Biased for being a spoiled Belgian, I suppose, but the cooking stuff [we get] is still pretty reasonable chocolate. The "chocolatey" bits in B&J or various glazes, on the other hand, are indeed quite a different thing.

      > where the flavouring is essence rather than artificial flavouring,
      The difference very very much depends on the actual flavour, I believe. For the amount used, I don't think the utter majority of the people are going to notice wether you use bourbon vanilla or vanillin in your dough. Toppings use more, so may or may not be more sensitive.

      > where the decorating is done by hand
      Doesn't change the flavour, although one does eat with one's eyes :-)

      > and includes fancy shapes made out of florist paste
      Muh? I suppose you mean decorating marzipan? Marzipan quality varies a lot, it's true; and the texture of the cheaper stuff can be very off, too.

      > as well as a generous topping of buttercream.
      And, again, real butter is indeed quite a distinct flavour.

      So, yes, you're right; but I'm not convinced the difference in ingredient prices alone makes that much of a difference - I'd imagine the raw ingredient price of a single cupcake will still not rise over 1£. Labour of handmade vs. industrial, however, is going to be a much more major factor, as will be pretty shop vs. cheapo supermarket.

      --
      What a depressingly stupid machine.
    67. Re:expensive cupcakes by geminidomino · · Score: 1

      With all due respect, the coffee you get at Starbucks (or better, Peet's or other Favorite Local Store) is not the coffee you get at a diner or lunch counter. That stuff is the same crap it's always been

      Starbucks has never even approached the same quality as the stuff you can get from 7-11 or Dunkin Donuts for 1/3 the price, and the cheaper places are more likely to be fresher, IME.

    68. Re:expensive cupcakes by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      [I]t's just a label change without a quality change.

      Paying more for a label is silly, but at least some of the higher end cupcake places I've visited were superior to the standard supermarket cupcakes, both in taste and decoration. Probably not $4 superior, but enough that I would consider paying more for the once or twice a year I buy a cupcake. But then again, I tend to consider cupcakes like this gourmet, so my taste might be suspect.

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    69. Re:expensive cupcakes by mrmeval · · Score: 1

      it's almost as if you're actually purchasing a token foodstuff of purely symbolic value to justify spending time in a place Other Than Home with wifi access, and the merchants are in pricing competition over that time, not over the token food item.

      That is EXACTLY the business model of Starbucks. They provide burned rubber, HFCS, fat, water and time.

      --
      I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
    70. Re:expensive cupcakes by jimicus · · Score: 1

      > and includes fancy shapes made out of florist paste
      Muh? I suppose you mean decorating marzipan? Marzipan quality varies a lot, it's true; and the texture of the cheaper stuff can be very off, too.

      No, I mean florist paste. It's basically sugar, water and starch. It holds the shape better than marzipan or sugar; it's rather stiffer and dries to something resembling thin card.

      It also tastes like thin card. It's bl**dy horrible stuff. But apparently for the sort of thing we're talking about, looks are more important than taste.

    71. Re:expensive cupcakes by jimicus · · Score: 1

      I didn't comment as to whether or not £2-3 was a good deal. Simply that there was a market for it - people are prepared to pay that.

    72. Re:expensive cupcakes by Grishnakh · · Score: 1

      Stuff from local bakeries is always better, though not always cheaper if they use better-quality ingredients than the garbage that name-brand stuff is made with.

      Of course, this article is about a bakery located in London, so there's no way they could afford to sell cupcakes for $0.89 equivalent in that location. The rent alone on that shop must be astronomical.

    73. Re:expensive cupcakes by Grishnakh · · Score: 2

      Of course Starbucks coffee is crap, though orders of magnitude better than the swill that passes for brewed coffee (and of course Starbucks does brewed coffee too - but why would you go there for that???)

      Apparently a lot of people like paying a lot of money for burnt coffee.

    74. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Where do you people live that you are not seeing the cupcake craze and the $3-$4 price tag.

      New Orleans.

      I'd not heard of this at all, till this thread...

      Then again, who needs cupcakes, when you can run out here and get a plate of freshly made beignets, and cafe au lait....for a few dollars?

      :)

      When I visited your fine city this was the first thing I was introduced to and I will forever remain jealous. Of course...more fun came later, but the beignets were enough to make me want to stay there forever. I miss the Cafe Du Monde so much....

    75. Re:expensive cupcakes by MikeyC01 · · Score: 1

      Apparently they do - the luxury car market is make money too http://money.cnn.com/2011/11/22/autos/bmw_sales_future.fortune/

    76. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just so long as it's not at Cafe du Monde... those beignets are fucking awful. The quality (and sanitation... ick) have taken an abysmal nosedive. Anyone who eats one of those and thinks that's the way they should taste is to be truly pitied.

    77. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bulllllshit a gourmet cupcake is the same. You think an actually high quality cupcake from a renowned bakery is the same shit as a "gourmet cupcake" from a place that is purely by overcharging?

    78. Re:expensive cupcakes by RajivSLK · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly this. Except the $0.89 cup cake at my local grocer is made with mostly lard and sugar with waxy poor quality chocolate and lard icing and comes in maybe 3 different flavours and is sold in very high volumes at a low price.

      Whereas the specialty cup cake is made with real butter high quality chocolate and other ingredients and is available in 20 different flavours and is sold in low volumes at a high price.

      Basically think of Neapolitan ice cream from some big manufacturer vs Baskin Robins or some such. You can argue that they are overpriced for what they are but you can't say that the products are exactly the same.

      One last point I'd like to make is that in some other countries in world, like France for example, specialty bakeries making high end pastries and cakes are the *only* types of bakeries. People are so willing to pay for higher quality food that there are no cheap grocery store alternatives. So maybe it's not a fad.

    79. Re:expensive cupcakes by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Sadly, the mom and pop bakery around the corner may be suffering loss of business to these new "gourmet" bakeries, and thus have to raise their prices to stay in business... shouldn't be too much of a problem since they still cost less than the competition... but when you're squeezed between "snoberia" and WalMart, it can be hard to keep that niche open.

    80. Re:expensive cupcakes by Darinbob · · Score: 1

      I'm glad I don't drink coffee. The whole cafe concept is just ludicrous to me. When dragged by friends I will have a soda or a hot chocolate and am angry to pay $4 for them (though I smile because my friends are there and bear the indignity).

    81. Re:expensive cupcakes by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      ...do people really have that kind of disposable cash laying around these days?

      How much did you spend on your video card?

      $19 - but then, I value silence over fraggage.

    82. Re:expensive cupcakes by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      I bought fresh cakes from a local grocery store bakery on Miami Beach for $6 to $9 in 1997ish - whole cakes, you know the kind that you could cut into a dozen slices and each slice would still be twice the size of a cupcake. Being Miami Beach, at some point they may have stepped up the prices, but their regular clientele in the 1990s were very cost conscious, so they did better with low prices and high volume.

    83. Re:expensive cupcakes by MobileTatsu-NJG · · Score: 1

      So, just for clarification, you're a computer user that builds his own machines and doesn't understand the concept of paying more for stuff that other people don't understand the value of. Right?

      --

      "I like to lick butts!" by MobileTatsu-NJG (#32700246) (Score:5, Informative)

    84. Re:expensive cupcakes by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      What is this "freedom toast" thing?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    85. Re:expensive cupcakes by BitZtream · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Exactly this. Except the $0.89 cup cake at my local grocer is made with mostly lard and sugar with waxy poor quality chocolate and lard icing and comes in maybe 3 different flavours and is sold in very high volumes at a low price.

      Whereas the specialty cup cake is made with real butter high quality chocolate and other ingredients and is available in 20 different flavours and is sold in low volumes at a high price.

      You're an idiot.

      That high volume cup cake with 'low quality' ingredients probably actually has far higher ingredients.

      Anyone who actually works in the industry is fully aware that a factory sized bakery is FAR more stringently controlled than moms corner cupcake shop, where they buy 'organic' ingredients, that are filled with all sorts of evil chemicals because while they were being brilliant about not using pesticides instead they used 'organic fertilized' treated with all sorts of other chemicals which should never be put on food products.

      They are ALL lard and sugar, you just want to pretend what you're paying $4 is different. Having worked in public health, I know far to well that you're ideas about how the little guy is 'better' or than the big guy could not be more wrong, almost 100% universally. The little guy gets by with FAR more than the big guy, which has thousands of vultures sitting around waiting to sue the ever living piss out of him.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    86. Re:expensive cupcakes by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      Yah, VAT is a bitch, and food in general is expensive as you approach the Arctic Circle, same problems in Alaska.

      I traveled by train up to Narvik and back over the course of about a week - food was so damned expensive on the trip that I ate very little, but after a week, I finally went into a grocery store in the middle of northern Sweden and bought whatever I wanted for lunch from the deli, price no object. I think it was about 300Kr (US$40+) for stuff that might have cost $15 in the states.

    87. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a creation dating back to 4th Century Rome known as "Pan Dulcis" which was invented as a way to use stale bread. It has, in the past few centuries, been popularized under the name "French" toast, although in France it was originally called pain a la Romaine, "Roman Bread".

      Or did you just want to know why he didn't call it French? Well, given all that, why should he?

    88. Re:expensive cupcakes by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Even easier when its done in a factory, in a MUCH larger amount so the proportions are even closer matched than I could possibly get at home.

      Betty Crocker uses the same crap that you were going to use moron.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    89. Re:expensive cupcakes by JoeMerchant · · Score: 1

      So, just for clarification, you're a computer user that builds his own machines and doesn't understand the concept of paying more for stuff that other people don't understand the value of. Right?

      Not exactly, I understand the value of video cards. I understand that a $19 video card will serve my needs, draw less current, while making less heat and noise. While a $300 video card would play StarCraft at higher settings and give me slightly more resolution and frame rate than the $19 card, StarCraft II is still playable on the $19 card, and for the other 99% of my computer usage, the $19 card is superior - even if it cost the same as the $300 card.

    90. Re:expensive cupcakes by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Except its a one word name, idiot. Thats why the b isn't capitalized.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    91. Re:expensive cupcakes by retchdog · · Score: 1

      Cooks Illustrated (a very good magazine) taste-tested several real vanilla extracts vs. synthetics (vanillin). Although the natural ones performed much better in lightly-flavored custards and ice creams, synthetic vanillin came out slightly ahead in baked goods.

      Also, "florist paste" is a weird and misleading term (florists sell flowers; if anything, it should be "baker paste"). It's more commonly called "gum paste," for obvious reasons.

      Here in the US, fondant is more common and also more pleasant to eat. Unless you need very precise or free-standing decorations, fondant's probably a better choice. Either one is easy to buy in bulk and much cheaper than marzipan, in addition to not triggering nut allergies.

      --
      "They were pure niggers." – Noam Chomsky
    92. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not a lowercase b, it's a capital 6.

    93. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The chain "just baked" which is gaining popularity up in MI actually uses betty crocker mix. wtf.

    94. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so of the historically appropriate names ( Pan Dulcis, pain a la Romaine, french toash), he chose a different one. The question isn't why didn't he use one of them, but why did he use a different one.

    95. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I had a fancy cupcake in Australia and it blew my socks off. I'd never had anything like it before or since. So, all this anti-fancy cupcake hate sounds a little ignorant to me. YMMV, but there are legit fancy cupcakes out there.

    96. Re:expensive cupcakes by freeze128 · · Score: 1

      I would rather eat a $4 cupcake than anyone's video card.

    97. Re:expensive cupcakes by hawkinspeter · · Score: 1

      I'm a fan of home roasting coffee. I used to use a hot air popcorn machine to roast small batches,but I eventually shelled out for a domestic coffee roaster. The freshness just can't be beaten. I'd recommend buying a quality grinder and trying an Aeropress - you'll be amazed by the difference.

      --
      You're a temporary arrangement of matter sliding towards oblivion in a cold, uncaring universe
    98. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      a cup of joe that used to cost cents at a diner or lunch counter in the 80's or before now costs dollars at Starbucks or Your Favorite Local Coffee Store

      Opinions don't count here - I've never tasted a cup of starbucks coffee that tastes like a diner coffee, so obviously opinions are different.
      Then again, I'm not in Gainesville, Florida.

    99. Re:expensive cupcakes by kryliss · · Score: 1

      In a year, a well built computer is still a well built computer... In 24 hours a $4 cupcake is just a turd.

      --
      --- If the bible proves the existence of God, then Superman comics prove the existence of Superman.
    100. Re:expensive cupcakes by dondelelcaro · · Score: 1

      a factory sized bakery is FAR more stringently controlled

      Factory sized bakeries are more stringently controlled, both by governmental regulation and for QA purposes. However, because of the magnifying effects of the economies of scale, cheaper ingredients are used wherever possible. Additionally, due to the need to maximize shelf-life, automate production lines, and reduce waste, components that would not normally be added to baked goods by smaller bakers are added in an industrial setting. Finally, while many so-called organic products are not free of contaminants, products produced using normal methods also contain many of these contaminants.

      --
      http://www.donarmstrong.com
    101. Re:expensive cupcakes by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I live in Phoenix Arizona (USA) and most cupcakes I've seen at supermarkets (safeway, frys) has been about $4-5 for 3-4.
      $4 a piece is great for those that want that one, nothing wrong with buying it if you want to. I have to admit though, since most pans usually have 6-12 on there, that return is quite a bit. I'm sure there's no professional baker that makes 6 at a time...

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    102. Re:expensive cupcakes by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      I really need to find this starbucks people go to where coffee is $4+ a cup.
      EVERY starbucks I've been to from Maryland to California has been ~$2. It was $1.90 but it recently went up to about $2.00.
      I'm talking about Venti (large)... 20 ounces.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    103. Re:expensive cupcakes by dadioflex · · Score: 1

      Freedom toast is bread, sliced, coated in egg and fried. Freedom never tasted so good.

    104. Re:expensive cupcakes by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, don't let the people that bitch about spending money on something (other than their cigarettes @ ~$5.00/pack) get you down...
      Seems I run into these people all the time... in real life, now on the internet.

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    105. Re:expensive cupcakes by arkane1234 · · Score: 1

      psst.. i think he was talking about what you comparing it to... lol

      --
      -- This space for lease, low setup fee, inquire within!
    106. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The secret ingredient is lsd so yeah pretty life altering.

    107. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I saw a promo for one of those pawn store shows where a guy bought a diamond dog collar - for his dog

      Okay- glad you explained that, for a minute I thought you meant a collar for a Diamond Dog. ;-)

    108. Re:expensive cupcakes by fahrbot-bot · · Score: 1

      To be fair, the 99% over this last decade spent a lot of their money getting these overpriced snacks/drinks while filling the coffers of the 1%.

      True, true. There will always be sheep and herders. The problem is that the herders often forget how much they actually need their sheep. Of course, their day of reckoning will come with the sheep-zombie apocalypse ... :-)

      --
      It must have been something you assimilated. . . .
    109. Re:expensive cupcakes by mwvdlee · · Score: 2

      So it's basically french toast?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    110. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That is called pain doré. It might be French, but nobody call that 'french toast' and only a retard would all them 'freedom toast'.

    111. Re:expensive cupcakes by heptapod · · Score: 1

      Make your own, save money, take advantage of economies of scale and give out leftovers to friends and family.

      Also stfu.

    112. Re:expensive cupcakes by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      A few companies ago, before the VCs took over they had Starbucks drip coffee in the break room. It was so good, you could hardly taste the urine! After the VC's took over, they went to "Seattle's Best" coffee. I believe the name is ironic. After that, the urine was an improvement.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    113. Re:expensive cupcakes by crossmr · · Score: 1

      Because he thinks he's a clever little smartie.

      Don't you remember that whole "Freedom fries" blow up in the US years ago because France wasn't supporting them on their latest global conquest?

    114. Re:expensive cupcakes by crossmr · · Score: 1

      it's frequently called "French Toast" in North America

    115. Re:expensive cupcakes by RajivSLK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I'm an Idiot? Really, that's how you start your argument... wow. I don't even know why I bothered reading the reset of your comment. When you start a response with "You're an Idiot" it just makes you sound stupid.

      Firstly, I don't really care how "controlled" a factory is. I didn't say that the factories used inedible or poisonous ingredients. I'm sure everything they use is approved and won't make you sick. Just like Neapolitan ice cream from the grocery store is perfectly fine to eat.

      Secondly, I don't care what you think "everybody in the industry" knows. Appeal to authority doesn't help your argument.

      Thirdly, I never said anything about organic ingredients so I'm not sure why you brought it up. When I said high quality ingredients I meant things like real vanilla bean in a vanilla cup cake instead of "artificial vanilla flavour" or saffron in a saffron cup cake. Or orange zest in a orange cupcake instead of "artificial flavours and colours". I suspect you would know this if you ever left your mom's basement.

      Fourthly, they are not ALL lard. Almost all specialty shops use real butter. Just Google "specialty cupcake ingredients". It's not that hard. You live in a really vacuous world if you think you can't get a real butter cupcake.

      I am guessing that you don't travel much and haven't experience things and people out of your comfort zone. You probably don't feel welcome in new environments and around new people. Probably because you flippantly call people "idiots" and then go on to say the stupidest things. I suggest you try being a bit more buttery to people perhaps little sweeter and more sugary and then, perhaps, you will make something called a "friend" or even multiple "friends". And maybe, just maybe, one of these "friends" might even buy you a cupcake, with real butter.

    116. Re:expensive cupcakes by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 1

      Then again, who needs cupcakes, when you can run out here and get a plate of freshly made beignets, and cafe au lait....for a few dollars?

      Surprisingly, the ones at the shopping mall are better than the ones in the French Quarter.

      --
      My God, it's Full of Source!
      OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
    117. Re:expensive cupcakes by cynyr · · Score: 1

      $125, back in march and I'll have little reason to upgrade next year as well.. The whole build was less than a grand including the new case, PSU, monitor, 1055T X6, and 8GB ram only things I didn't replace were the keyboard and mouse. So about $80 a month so far, and it will probably be down around $40 when I upgrade again.

      http://www.newegg.com/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16814125341

      --
      All of the above was encrypted with a Quad ROT-13 method. Unauthorized decryption is in violation of the DMCA.
    118. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In southern Europe, things are good *and* cheap. My local bar-café charges 80c for an espresso, 90c for a pastry and €1.30 for a panino, all of higher standard than you'd find anywhere in the US or northern Europe. A restaurant meal of local, seasonal produce with good local wine works out to less than €15 a head. I am told that the US has a variety of corrupt agricultural tariffs that inflate the cost of real food, but there's certainly nothing intrinsically expensive about a decent coffee.

    119. Re:expensive cupcakes by spire3661 · · Score: 1

      It was Casey's Cupcakes in Laguna. We were taking the local bus down to the in-laws in Dana Point from Lake Forest and had a 'layover' in Laguna so we got a cupcake snack and ate them while listening to the Laguna bus stop bums commiserate.

      We take the bus down about twice a year just for funsies. Its a nice ride through the canyon and then 10 miles of oceanfront plus the always entertaining layover in downtown Laguna.

      --
      Good-bye
    120. Re:expensive cupcakes by Pirate_Pettit · · Score: 1

      yeah, I've been there - right near the hippodrome. I agree with you wholeheartedly - if I'm gonna spend 4 bucks before a show, it's going to be on coffee.

    121. Re:expensive cupcakes by z0idberg · · Score: 3, Funny

      It takes a lot longer to type out "Unsanctioned and illegal invasion toast". So its shortened to "Freedom toast".

    122. Re:expensive cupcakes by axlr8or · · Score: 1

      I can't believe you didn't get a 6 for that hahahaahaa!! Thanx 4 laugh.

    123. Re:expensive cupcakes by syockit · · Score: 1

      Buying imports? Spending on foreign services (like, playing WoW)? All your money drains out of the country.

      --
      Democracy is for the people; you only vote once per season and we'll do the rest of the work for you don't have to.
    124. Re:expensive cupcakes by Meski · · Score: 1

      That high volume cup cake with 'low quality' ingredients probably actually has far higher ingredients.

      Probably actually? I think you just made my day. (but today, that wasn't hard) :^)

    125. Re:expensive cupcakes by Meski · · Score: 1

      And burnt milk. Give them half a chance, and they'd burn the water.

    126. Re:expensive cupcakes by Eskarel · · Score: 1

      In actuality, it's a lot more expensive to create a dozen cupcakes than to create one cake of similar combined size. Sure the batter part of it is the same, but the rest of the process is a lot more labor intensive for cupcakes than cakes. They're harder to cook, harder to ice, and in general are far more fiddly.

      The other thing being that currency conversion rates are meaningless. £2 in the UK is not the same as $4 in the US whatever the exchange rate might be. Australia has about parity on the US dollar, but pretty much everything costs more. Petrol here is somewhere in the general vicinity of $US5 per gallon, cost of living is just different.

    127. Re:expensive cupcakes by neyla · · Score: 1

      Yeah, but factoring in all that, and using the numbers from the article, all of that adds to £9 for a dozen cupcakes. Which then normally sells for £26.

      No matter how you twist and turn it, that's a very healthy margin.

    128. Re:expensive cupcakes by Meski · · Score: 1

      Or mind altering.

    129. Re:expensive cupcakes by mwvdlee · · Score: 1

      What does France have to do with the toast named by the American-born Joseph French?

      --
      Slashdot social media options: AIM, ICQ, Yahoo, Jabber and Mobile Text. Why no MySpace?
    130. Re:expensive cupcakes by crossmr · · Score: 1

      if you're intentionally being obtuse you're an idiot, if you're not being intentionally obtuse then you're a moron.

      It was considered clever and hilarious to replace the word "French" with "Freedom". Most people wouldn't have a clue that it didn't come from France.

    131. Re:expensive cupcakes by angelofdarkness · · Score: 1

      A properly pulled espresso in Naples, Italy costs 0.80 Euros, if you're paying anything more than a dollar or so for an untrained person to give you an espresso in a paper cup you ARE getting ripped off.
      Note: current exchange rate is 1 U.S. dollar = 0.74 Euros

    132. Re:expensive cupcakes by rioki · · Score: 1

      +1

      Ok I am not really into cupcakes and am definitely not an expert on the subject; but I lived in France most of my childhood and know very much about french pastry... (yum).

      Just to get it out of the way, there is supermarket pastry but almost nobody buys them. The major cost in making pastry is normally not the ingredients, it's the time / labor it takes to make them. Actually there is not so much difference in the ingredients, but they still have a order of a magnitude difference in taste. The real point is that freshly made pastries taste WAY better than pastries that stood around longer than half a day. This not helped that many things, like whipped creme, do not "hold" for a long period of time. So the industrially made pastry needs conservatives and stabilizers and you can taste them, even if it is just in the consistency.

      Unfortunately many french bakeries start to use shortcuts to increase their profit margin / stay profitable. (I don't really know which is the real case.) For example they will buy dough from some factory, for example half baked baguette. The real trick is that they bake it fresh and that makes the major difference. Then again with french pastries you have like 20 things more to do than dough to get them done, and I am not talking croissants here. Just google "french pastries" to see what I mean...

    133. Re:expensive cupcakes by Tharsman · · Score: 1

      Even buying an import car helps local economy, as the car dealer employs locals and agencies dedicated to the import of these cars employ man power to move the vehicles, not to mention local storage, etc etc.

      WoW may be a different case, unless the copy was bought at a local store. But I'm certain the $15 per month are nothing compared to the rest of the money spent locally.

      We live in a global economy. Frankly, expecting 100% of the money spent anywhere to stay local is a bit naive.

    134. Re:expensive cupcakes by JSBiff · · Score: 1

      But, those diners, fast food restaurants, etc where you get a cup of coffee (with refills) for 99 cents have a lot of those same costs - rent, insurance, management, advertising, taxes, et. al. Why is it they can make money selling coffee for 99 cents but the coffee shop has to sell it for $3.99?

    135. Re:expensive cupcakes by DrFalkyn · · Score: 1

      Buying imports? Spending on foreign services (like, playing WoW)? All your money drains out of the country.

      And now that country has money to buy the goods and services that your country produces...

    136. Re:expensive cupcakes by cygnwolf · · Score: 1

      If they are suffering, you can't tell it from the line at the counter every morning.

      --
      Free Pie! The Pie is Also Evil!
    137. Re:expensive cupcakes by Grizzley9 · · Score: 1

      No, it doesn't. If that were true we could solve all our economic problems by ordering everyone to pay someone else to dig and refill a hole.

      Not quite. Digging a whole then refilling it doesn't result in a net gain of output or resources. Only tangentially since people will be hungrier from having worked and eat and drink more or buy skinnier clothes.

      Purchasing locally made goods in this example helps the local economy and the overall economy by using actual resources. The cupcake, while marginal, fulfills a small nutritional need and even a psychological one to a point. The baker makes money that can be spend on labor, more resources, etc or take out loans from the bank to expand, creating more money. The flour and butter and sugar have to come from somewhere. The dirt in the whole, goes right back in the hole with no net gain unless there is a need to till the soil in that spot. Service industries are peculiar in that way.

    138. Re:expensive cupcakes by DriedClexler · · Score: 1

      Your missing the essential point: how much "net gain of output or resources" results from a purchase itself depends on how much people actually value what they bought. If you *make* people buy something they hate, for example, you shouldn't treat that as having the same economic benefit as an ordinary voluntary purchase.

      The hole-digging/refilling thing is just an extreme example to make the point; the phenomenon exists to some extent with all policies of the type you advocated: if people buy something they *wouldn't have otherwise wanted to buy* (perhaps because they believe the economic theories you're endorsing), you can't fully count the cash value of the purchase as an economic benefit, for the same reason you shouldn't count at all the economic benefit of hole-dig/refilling.

      In short: spending is not good. Good spending is good. Spending solely to "help the economy" (rather than because you actually *want* the stuff) is not good, and it props up unsustainable enterprises. And it waste resources in exactly the same sense that paying people to dig/refill holes.

      --
      Information theory is life. The rest is just the KL divergence.
    139. Re:expensive cupcakes by CrackedButter · · Score: 1

      My custom designed "," will do fine but thank you for the offer. I still have some bog standard "." left over anyway.

    140. Re:expensive cupcakes by Drugmath · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it fell victim to the wave of anti-French sentiment in America around the start of the Iraq war, much like how some Americans started called french fries `freedom fries`

    141. Re:expensive cupcakes by Y-Crate · · Score: 1

      Starbucks and Seattle's Best are the same company.

    142. Re:expensive cupcakes by Greyfox · · Score: 1

      That doesn't make any sense! That would mean... the urine changed! Oh... My... God...! It was the CEO peeing in the coffee all along!

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    143. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are paying such prices for the shitty brewed coffee you were getting at a lunch counter, then yes you are being an idiot and getting ripped off.

      But an esspresso machine costs significantly more both in initial cost and in maintenance costs than a brewing machine. It also requires more training to use (though Starbucks seems to skip that bit). It's also significantly slower (so you need more staff hours to make the same amount of coffee).

      Of course Starbucks coffee is crap, though orders of magnitude better than the swill that passes for brewed coffee (and of course Starbucks does brewed coffee too - but why would you go there for that???)

      And cupcakes have none of that. A "gourmet" cupcake is made in exactly the same oven with exactly the same ingredients as a regular cupcake...

      LMAO - Look at the coffee moron trying to justify his idiotic purchase.

    144. Re:expensive cupcakes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok so of the historically appropriate names ( Pan Dulcis, pain a la Romaine, french toash), he chose a different one. The question isn't why didn't he use one of them, but why did he use a different one.

      He's exercising his freedom to call it whatever he wants, just like the people who inaccurately refer to it as "French".

    145. Re:expensive cupcakes by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      Frist cupcakes are so over. Second you need to go to Vanilla in Santa Monica and then you will understand what a cup cake should taste like. She is a real baker who just makes the cup cakes to supplement her wedding cake slow days. THIRD ITS LIKE THE PERFECT GEEK CUP CAKE SHE IS A BERMAN OF THE STAR TREK BERMANS.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    146. Re:expensive cupcakes by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      yeah I know people prove how dumb they are everyday. Even the people who are trying to make fun of the French toast by claiming the french would never call it that. I hope not since its AMERICAN.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    147. Re:expensive cupcakes by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      a gourmet cup cake is not made the same way unless you think you can make this cup cake in the same amount of time and cost. http://www.marthastewart.com/315293/meyer-lemon-raspberry-cupcakes pay attention to the ingredients dumb ass. No that you would like it but it for sure cost way more to make then a regular cup cake.

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
    148. Re:expensive cupcakes by AgNO3 · · Score: 1

      maybe you should try one of these then. (well these are the cakes she makes the cup cakes are freaking amazing. Like I don't get a cake for my birthday anymore i get her cup cakes because her cakes cost to much but the taste so good. http://vanillabakeshop.com/gallery.php

      --
      OMG Ponies!!! with Glitter!!!! I miss Pink :-(
  19. Only The Latest GroupOn Horror Story by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This is only the latest GroupOn horror story, and many of them probably don't make the press. Personally I won't even use GroupOn because I feel so sorry for the retailers involved. It's a personal decision.

    The next horror story will be from the people scammed by the IPO who thought that they were buying into a company that actually created something of value. Hard to believe that Google once offered billions ($5.75 billion, I believe) for this vaporware company -- and GroupOn actually turned them down. That was the luckiest turndown since Yahoo! refused Microsoft's (by today's standards) insanely generous offer.

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
    1. Re:Only The Latest GroupOn Horror Story by sjames · · Score: 1

      In the groupon case, I can only guess they knew they'd never pass muster during the financial due diligence phase of a buyout. Otherwise, they'd have to have several excess holes in their head.

  20. Groupon needs a staggered approach by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Groupon should offer a staggered approach. First 100 customers get offered 75% off. Next 100 get offered 50%, then 25%. After a time, the system could float to the discount that was optimal, with some total per day limit.

    --
    All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
    1. Re:Groupon needs a staggered approach by volsung · · Score: 1

      There already is a simple limit scheme available, but this business owner chose not to use it. Presumably this failure was a combination of lack of due diligence by the business owner and some pressure from Groupon sales staff. Groupon assumes that few businesses will ever offer a deal through them twice, so their strategy seems to be squeezing as many sales out of them as possible, margins and customer quality be damned.

      Hopefully stories like this will make more small business owners aware of the risks associated with massive cut-rate promotions through sites like Groupon.

    2. Re:Groupon needs a staggered approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your idea is good, but Groupon is not interested in anything like that. For the simple reason that it's a *investment scam* and they don't care about long term problems. They're just in it to skim off as much investor cash as possible before it all collapses. The people at the top already took 900 million dollars of investor money --- for themselves.

    3. Re:Groupon needs a staggered approach by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't run small numbers for cheap products. They take a cut of the price, they're not interested in making a few hundred dollars per job, and won't do your promotion.

    4. Re:Groupon needs a staggered approach by neonKow · · Score: 1

      Why? How is this better than a simple flat discount? It seems like you'd just turn off customers who feel like they've been gypped out of a better deal?

    5. Re:Groupon needs a staggered approach by Maximum+Prophet · · Score: 1

      Why? How is this better than a simple flat discount? It seems like you'd just turn off customers who feel like they've been gypped out of a better deal?

      Look at the airlines. You might have paid $600 for a last minute seat, but the person next to you paid $200 for the same flight, but bought it 2 weeks ago.

      When you're selling a product, any price you get above what it costs to make is profit. But, you can only charge what people are willing to spend. So, the trick to maximizing your profit, is to figure out what each customer is willing to spend, then sell to that customer for that price. (as you've stated, you need to do this without pissing off the customer who pays more)

      The key here is value add. A normal cupcake might sell for $0.30. A custom cupcake, with a design or special flavor, might sell for $3.00. Fresh, out the oven, delivered might be $6.00, while a day old cupcake might only bring $.15. As long as each customer perceives that they are getting a unique product, they won't worry that the other guy only paid 10% of what they did.

      Of course with more expensive things, like enterprise software, you can get your customers to sign NDAs about how much they paid, then tell each and every one of them that they are getting a discount on the list price. Since they can't legally compare prices, they won't complain too much.

      Groupon could do this by only offering some customers the great deal, and the others a lesser deal. If not enough customers take the great deal, then re-offer another customer a better deal.

      --
      All ideas^H^H^H^H^Hprocesses in this post are Patent Pending. (as well as the process of patenting all postings)
  21. Similar offer in my city by grantpalin · · Score: 1

    Interestingly, I was just looking at a Groupon offer for a local cupcake business, offering up to 55% off one or two dozen cupcakes. I'm in a small(er) city, so don't think an event like this story shows will happen here. Hope not, anyway. I appreciate local businesses!

    1. Re:Similar offer in my city by grantpalin · · Score: 1

      Seems that there is a limit in place on this offer: "Limited quantity available" Shouldn't be too much trouble for the business then.

  22. Reminds me of The Big Bang Theory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When they made a site for Penny to sell blossoms that she made by hand and had one day rush that resulted in thousands of blossoms from the LGBT community of somewhere.

    I never thought I would see the day where something so innocent like that would happen in real life.

    Should always do the math and multiply by 1 million whenever you do anything with the internet just for risks sake.
    Things can get ugly real fast if you don't do enough Risk Analysis.
    Just look at Zynga. Too much growth and not enough income that really hit them hard.

  23. local culinary school? Maybe if she had more time by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    She probably didn't have time to think of approaching a school for work; a temp agency can have workers there in an hour.

    The real WTF of this is her not putting a limit on the number of orders possible. That is possible, right?

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  24. Do'oh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do'oh! Those SHARKS!

    Of course the people who ORDERED THEM will be blaming the maker for obeasity.
    just don't be responsible.

    Where is Homer?

  25. Re:local culinary school? Maybe if she had more ti by datavirtue · · Score: 1

    Yeah, I would have jammed the door with my foot. That is one of the things you have to do in business, stop losses. I look for her to go out of business from this.

    --
    I object to power without constructive purpose. --Spock
  26. Go ahead, try to run a bakery. by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 1, Insightful

    There's more to a thing than the some of the components: whether it's a baked good's ingredients or a iPhone's transistors.

    Exactly.

    How long do cupcakes take to bake? How much does the oven cost to run? How long do they take to cool before you can begin decorating? How long do they take to decorate? How long do the utensils take to clean between batches, plus the resources (water, soap, drying time) to do so? How much fridge space do you have, and how much do they cost to run? How much are you paying your staff? Note that for a big rush like this at least one of them will be on full-time register duty and unavailable for baking/decorating. Is anyone going to be free to take new orders (e.g. that couple that came in planning to spend a few hundred on a wedding cake...)?

    The raw ingredients are one of the smallest contributors to cost.

    --
    PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    1. Re:Go ahead, try to run a bakery. by Inda · · Score: 1

      I worked in a large bakery; it was a school job I did on a Sunday, 20 years ago.

      1 person cracking the eggs, two handed, and mixing the flour.
      4 people to fold and roll the Danish pastry. It was heavy.
      1 person to cut the shapes, roll or fold the pastry, and possibly add nut toppings, raisins, etc
      1 person manned the walk-in ovens.

      Then it was my job to add the fondant icing. 10,000 cakes I'd do in 6 hours. Possibly some butterscotch dipping.

      1 person packing
      1 person in the warehouse.
      1 person in the delivery van.

      Like everything in life, it's the labour costs that add up.

      --
      This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
    2. Re:Go ahead, try to run a bakery. by Hognoxious · · Score: 1

      1 person manned the walk-in ovens.

      Godwin.

      --
      Confucius say, "Find worm in apple - bad. Find half a worm - worse."
  27. Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why are people still making food like this? I thought 3D printing and Makerbots are revolutionizing everything?

    1. Re:Huh? by benjamindees · · Score: 1

      Because you can still get a business loan from zombie banks to start a fucking cupcake business, but not to invest in actual productive capital.

      --
      "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh, because someone melting plastic in a glue gun to make wibbly pieces of shit is productive, but bakers are losers. Only on Slashdot with well-fed pasty out-of-shape white middle aged geeks who never worked a real job in their lives producing *anything* will that comment be a +5. I wish a few days starvation on you and then maybe you'll start realizing how pathetically juvenile and jejune you are.

      Go fuck yourself you brainwashed clown. Maybe you didn't notice the 10 million $ that went to that pathetic Makerbot, a rip off of the Reprap? Is that business "loany" enough for you, idiot? For a fucking glue gun on the end of a stepper motor? That changes nothing at all anywhere to anything except to feed the delusions of the geeks?

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let them eat (subsidized) cupcakes...

      Then let them get free healthcare.

  28. This is typical Groupon by CopterHawk · · Score: 1

    My mother in law worked for a groupon competitor. Groupon is known for purposly missleading and screwing their customers. The bad thing is that the businesses that are most likely to fall for it are little mom and pop places that may not survive.

  29. Groupon deals are by default NOT GOOD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The shine of "getting a deal" is soon to come off - the Groupon folks should have cashed out when they could.

  30. £26 value not necessarily £26 normal p by CrispyZorro · · Score: 1
    £26 value could simply mean that someone has paid that much for the type of cupcake she is advertising. The Groupon only says:

    "Twelve Cupcakes with a Choice of Flavours and Designs for £6.50 from Need a Cake (Value £26)." "Today's deal gets Groupon gourmands twelve individually decorated cupcakes from Need a Cake. Customers can construct their ideal cupcake, choosing from sponge flavour, icing and decoration options."

    In the first paragraph, I think the author of the article erroneously concludes that this is the normal price. She might sell her cupcakes at a normal price of £7 and always tell customers they are a £26 value.

  31. Dem must be some kick-ass cakes! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Normally £26? That's $16.64. A dozen! (Just over $1.38 each.) With the discount, it'll pop it down to $4.16/doz.

    Well, I'm here in the states, so let's go shopping, shall we? (Let's shall!)

    1 Box Jiffy brand mix = $1.25 (makes about 18 average or 12 large muffins)
    1 Box Jiffy brand frosting = $.75 (more than enough for muffins)
    Food coloring = ? (most bakers already have this, only a few drops needed)
    2 or 3 eggs = $.50-.75 (.25 each - 2 eggs for yellow or chocolate cake, 3 whites for white cake)
    About another $.25-50 for milk/oil/PAM
    Figure about $.50 for electric/gas use (mixer, oven, etc)

    So, for about $3.25-3.75, I can make my own damn muffins cheaper than her. Which I have done on many occasions for coworkers, and haven't had any complaints, yet. Having a professional do this -should- run about $4-5, her Groupon price, as she'd most likely have a bulk discount on all her essentials.

    Doesn't anybody bake any more?

    (For the record, I'm a guy who likes DIYing.)

  32. I don't see the problem by TempySmurf · · Score: 1

    She only lost money because she had to hire other people. She had figured she would be fine if it was just her and her employees making the cupcakes. There's 8,500 people she's marketed to and with even a small fraction of returning customers she'll make her money back rather quickly. If around 5% returned just once or even a half of a percent returned several times, she'll still come out ahead in the end. It looks like her cheap marketing tactic just turned into an expensive one, but it'll still give her good numbers in the end. I would be ecstatic if that happened to me, but complaining about it gets you even more business.

  33. Don't sell at a loss by Pitr · · Score: 2

    Anyone who offers a sale below the cost of manufacture is seriously lacking in business sense. At worst this should only have netted zero. Any model where "the more you sell, the more you lose" is just stupid. That, and if you can't make a dozen cupcakes for £6.50 (~$13!) after cost, you should really give up baking.

    --

    --Not to be worried, Pitr fix.
    1. Re:Don't sell at a loss by DJCouchyCouch · · Score: 1

      see: loss leader.

    2. Re:Don't sell at a loss by billcopc · · Score: 1

      They are probably very fancy, hyper-indulgent cupcakes, along the same vein as Crumbs Cupcakes. This type of bakery have been springing up all over, my wife's addicted to that crap. They're something like $4 each, and filled with buzzwords like "organic", "gluten-free" and "machine washable". On a positive note, each one has a thick layer of perfectly laid cream cheese frosting. The ones made by non-ginger non-vegans, you know, with actual sugar, like those from Crumbs, I find them pretty awesome. It's a palm-sized ball of happy crack-laced diabetes.

      Of course, since they're the latest fad, everyone and their celiac mother are jumping on the bandwagon with zero business acumen, like the people in TFA. They have waking dreams of endless profits, yet fail at basic arithmetic. You know how the saying goes: 9 out of 10 businesses fail within the first 2 years. Well 9 out of 10 business owners are complete imbeciles so it's really no surprise.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    3. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Burning1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Never ever heard the term "loss leader" have we? Frys makes a lot of money selling $100 cables to the guys who buy $500 TVs.

    4. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and people wonder why the economy isn't doing so well...

      If she had worked out the numbers so she made $2 an order, she would be a success story instead of this epic fail

      raising the price would have the added benefit of fewer orders, so she could make the food without sacrificing quality.

    5. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who offers a sale below the cost of manufacture is seriously lacking in business sense. At worst this should only have netted zero.

      Groupon under such circumstances may be worthwhile if you're *already* holding a large amount of perishable stock- but that's obviously a case of minimising one's losses rather than actually making money.

      Aside from that, the reason that most people do it- to get customers through the door and/or build loyalty- seem like a waste of time, as you'll be lucky to make any money on the Groupon itself and the only apparent loyalty by Groupon users is to Groupon itself and its next cheap deal.

    6. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Cigarra · · Score: 1

      It's called advertising.

      --
      I don't have a sig.
    7. Re:Don't sell at a loss by DerekLyons · · Score: 1

      Anyone who offers a sale below the cost of manufacture is seriously lacking in business sense.

      Precisely this. Many posters are trying to blame Groupon - but at the end of the day, the fact is that regardless of Groupon's sales tactics, she made a horribly stupid business decision. One that anyone with intelligence should have known was stupid in advance because two minutes with the back of an envelope would have revealed that fact. This is why most businesses fail - running a business is much harder than most people think.

    8. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What could be at cost at moderate value can be below cost when you have to hire emergency workers with the needed skills (quite a bit more expensive then normal long time workers). The real problem is simply that she was too stupid to not put some type of limitations on coupon or simply limit the amount available. (Restrict demand or control the demand to where it won't overwhelm you). Of course, maybe she just couldn't imagine the amount of orders she would get compared to her normal operations but a business (that's successful) really should plan for any situations.

    9. Re:Don't sell at a loss by LordLucless · · Score: 1

      No, she probably wouldn't have. Because a small boutique bakery can't scale linearly.

      She might have been able to make a $2 profit on the first hundred orders, because her existing infrastructure could cope with that. If demand spikes really high though (like it did in this case), then she's forced to outlay - hire more staff, more ovens. bigger premises - just to fulfill orders for a one-time spike that is unlikely to ever occur again.

      --
      Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
    10. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      if you can't make a dozen cupcakes for £6.50 (~$13!) after cost, you should really give up baking.

      £6.50 = £3.25 to the bakery and £3.25 to Groupon.

      Constantly thinking that the voucher sale price is going straight in the till is probably the kind of math that led this woman astray.

    11. Re:Don't sell at a loss by Kjella · · Score: 1

      I really doubt the $500 TV is sold at a loss. Maybe if it's the headline TV in a major sale, but not normally. But the profits come from selling $100 cables, extended warranty and whatnot. A grocery store is much more likely to have true loss leaders, giving you a few items on sale below cost to make you shop a basket full of goods. Apart from short lived marketing campaign, true loss leaders are actually quite rare.

      --
      Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  34. "while supplies last" by Khashishi · · Score: 1

    Three words could have saved the baker a bundle of money and prevented a big headache.

  35. Max? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I've seen lots of Groupons with a maximum number and I can't quite fathom why more businesses, especially small businesses like this one, don't figure that out and calculate a reasonable max they could deal with.

  36. Do the math by Temujin_12 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    My wife owns her own photography business (just her and an employee) and she had been toying around with the idea of using Groupon and LivingSocial. As much as she hates spreadsheets, I made here sit down and model what the deal looked like and what her break-even points were. Talk to your Groupon/LivingSocial rep. to get stats about similar deals (as much as they can give you)--quantity, conversion rate, customer conversion, etc and be conservative since the rep will definitely paint a rosy picture. After doing that, she made some very important changes to the structure of the deal she made with LivingSocial that protected her against some run-away scenarios that would have cost her money like this person ran into and the LivingSocial deal has been a great success.

    The other thing, hinted at by the owner of the bakery is your brand. If all you're concerned about is pushing product and volume, then a low-end price for the Groupon/LivingSocial deal is the way to go. But be aware that the lower the barrier to entry the less the customer values you or your services. For service-based businesses (like my wife's photography company), a higher price for the deal is more likely to bring customers who value service and quality. You can still offer good discounts while having a higher price point by carefully choosing what you discount and what they are purchasing up front.

    Bottom line: know who your optimal customer is and do the math or you're likely to get burned.

    --
    Faith is a willingness to accept something w/o complete proof and to act on it. Reason allows you to correct that faith.
    1. Re:Do the math by billcopc · · Score: 1

      The problem I have with Groupon is that, for most businesses, it is the wrong approach. You pay nothing up-front, instead you give them half of your take. The more popular your deal is, the more costly Groupon is compared to traditional advertising. The whole "no money down" thing is a very treacherous lure for inexperienced business owners who simply don't have a clue how to market their products and services, and to a cynical bastard like myself, it suggests a lack of confidence in their own brand.

      There is nothing wrong in running a time-limited half-off promotion, but the potential customers you should be courting are the ones who will give you repeat business. From what I've seen, Groupon users are not loyal customers. If they found you on Groupon today, tomorrow they will find something else. Easy come, easy go. Is that worth half of your already-discounted income ? I'm no marketing guru, but my spreadsheet says no. I'd rather have lower volume and higher profits.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
  37. Welcome to the Jungle... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  38. At least she honored them by Skraut · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A few months ago a local restaurant had a Groupon which my wife purchased. It was a 5 course dinner for 2 for $20 on weeknights, or $30 for Thursday - Sunday. Within 2 days she received an email from Groupon stating that the restaurant was no longer honoring the deal. Groupon gave us a full credit (not refund, just money we could use towards another deal) Ever since this, my wife has not wanted to go back there.

    The irony of this was that we discovered this restaurant through a different deal website, and it quickly became somewhat of a regular for us. Honoring a previous deal made us customers, not honoring a subsequent deal made us no longer customers.

    --
    Introducing Microsoft Vacuum 1.0 The first Microsoft product that doesn't suck.
    1. Re:At least she honored them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Although the restaurant is probably better without you. You discovered them through a deal and probably only went to them for a deal. They really didn't make much money off of you and really don't miss you much. They may have lost groupon customers, but that is the point, real businesses don't want groupon customers because they suck and aren't profitable.

      The #1 reason I stopped buying groupons is that a business that does groupons is 100x times more likely to do other similar promotions through marketing/coupon sites. I just buy the coupon from restaurant.com or go on a 2-for-1 special night and get the exact same thing without prepaying for it and having more restrictions on it.

      They only businesses that work with groupon are super high margin businesses. Restaurant are close, but only really luxury services do well and that is about all you find on groupon anymore

    2. Re:At least she honored them by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      What you should have also gotten out of it is that Groupon is a shitty place to get 'deals' from.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:At least she honored them by shutdown+-p+now · · Score: 1

      Have you considered that, perhaps, the restaurant was in a similar conundrum, and was approaching the point where they had to either dishonor the Groupon deal or go down honoring all the coupons?

  39. Groupon Sales Tactics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would like to hear her story on why there was no limit before saying she is stupid for not putting a limit on it.

    Remember, Groupon has shady sales tactics (there are many articles out there saying this). A sales person could have advised her not to limit it because cupcakes in that area never sell more than ~200. Groupon got a cut on all those cupcake deals.

    I would believe Groupon pushed her to not limit it rather then tell her to limit it based on sales around the area. Yeah she should have done the math, but you should know how Sales people work and how pushy they can be in their knowledge about the business.

  40. Groupon is grossly overrated by billcopc · · Score: 1

    I'm not a fan of Groupon. It's a flashy fad that's bringing mass-marketing to the everyman, and launching lots of small businesses head-first into ruin. The people who would conceptually stand to benefit most from Groupon's reach are also those who can't actually afford the costs of unbounded promotion. My greatest beef is that Groupon keeps half of what you pay, so if a shop is offering a 50% discount, well the owner is actually getting only 25%. Groupon is printing giant piles of money for essentially running the most basic web advertising.

    Cheapskates flock to the ridiculous bargains. Owners flock to the millions of eyeballs. Both get fleeced in the end, because you always get what you pay for. I've actually come to think less of businesses that advertise via Groupon, it is almost always a desperate plea for attention for a product or service that cannot stand on its own.

    --
    -Billco, Fnarg.com
  41. When Groupon actually works.... by awjr · · Score: 4, Informative

    I've known a number of businesses that got burnt by Groupon. One of the pubs we used regularly did a groupon deal and we went in and bought a lot of drinks with the meal. Most other people just asked for a glass of water and never came back.

    There are two situations where Groupon works:
    1) There is no cost to you (Gym membership) and there is a chance to up sell.
    2) You have sourced an item at a ridiculously cheap price and even with Groupon taking 50% you are going to make a profit.

    On (2), I knew somebody who sourced suits for $30, created a web site for the sales ploy, sold a 1000 units through Groupon at $250 and made a fortune.

    Groupon can be extremely destructive to your business.

    1. Re:When Groupon actually works.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not fair, it's not Groupon that is damaging to the business it is the businesses fault that they put something on Groupon that was going to hurt their business. Groupon is a sound idea and a good promotion for businesses small and large but to try and put an offering on there with no cap on how many you are selling and that you are taking a loss on each item/product is bad business not to mention pretty dumb. The lady who owns this business should have checked her math.

  42. This sounds like a job for Pinkie Pie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All you have to do is take a cup of flour,
    Add it to the mix.
    Now just take a little something sweet, not sour,
    A bit of salt, just a pinch.

    Baking these treats is such a cinch,
    Add a teaspoon of vanilla,
    Add a little more, and you count to four
    And you never get your fill of

    Cupcakes, so sweet and tasty.
    Cupcakes, don't be too hasty.
    Cupcakes...cupcakes, cupcakes, CUPCAKES!
    ------

    Now just multiply that by 50,000 or so.

    1. Re:This sounds like a job for Pinkie Pie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cupcakes...cupcakes, cupcakes, CUPCAKES!

      Brohoof!

  43. $20k advertising campaign if you ask me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    let's hope for her that the fame will translate into future profits

  44. cut off? Re:And the moral of today's story is... by Fubari · · Score: 2
    From TFA:

    Mrs Brown said: "We had thousands and thousands [of orders] pouring in. We had to cut it off at 8,500 orders. As soon as we were making, packaging and sending the cakes out we were on to the next order. It was non-stop.

    (emphasis added) Near the end of TFA:

    Heather Dickinson, a Groupon spokeswoman, said there was no limit to the number of vouchers that could be sold. She said: “We approach each business with a tailored, individual approach based on the prior history of similar deals.”

  45. spin: loss vs. advertising cost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    New headline: Internet-savvy baker spends £20k on local advertising and then gets millions in free international advertising + local sympathy purchases.

  46. There is no "inability" by sirwired · · Score: 1

    Groupon absolutely allows merchants to limit deals. Merchants simply fail to actually do so.

    1. Re:There is no "inability" by vux984 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Merchants simply fail to actually do so.

      Not quite. The merchants that elect to set reasonable caps don't get their promo run. So you don't see them.

      Groupon runs the deals that make them the most money.

      If a cupcake business wants to run 200 coupons @ 75% off for $7where groupon takes half ($4.50) that's only $900 for groupon.

      Groupon simply won't run that deal.

      Groupon pushes hard for deals they damn well know don't make an ounce of sense for the business.

      When I hire a contractor, or a consultant, or an ad agency... their job is fundamentally to come up with a good solution for the the business.

      If a particular contractor consistently advises, even pushes businesses hard to make catastrophic decisions then they deserve some of the credit for those catastrophic decisions.

    2. Re:There is no "inability" by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      No this is such a load of crap it's insane.

      Groupon abso-fucking-lutely runs the best deals for them, but it isn't their fault if a business doesn't have an attractive enough offer.

      Most businesses around here *make* money on groupon deals. That's not just free advertising... that's getting *paid* for advertising. Those businesses somehow magically still manage to get groupon to run it.

      She's a moron, and you're looking pretty dumb by defending her too.

    3. Re:There is no "inability" by vux984 · · Score: 2

      Most businesses around here *make* money on groupon deals.

      There are -some- business models where groupon makes money. There are several more where it makes sense to run a groupon for advertising at certain pricepoints / limits.

      But to claim "most businesses around here make money on groupon deals" is a flat out lie, and is precisely the sort of CRAP groupon tells businesses while inducing them to make catastrophic decisions.

    4. Re:There is no "inability" by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      Really you live in/have detailed knowledge of my local area? how exactly do you even know where that is?

      What I said is exactly true, you're just out to show groupon is a meanie because they took your lunch money as a kid or something.

    5. Re:There is no "inability" by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Really you live in/have detailed knowledge of my local area? how exactly do you even know where that is?

      I don't need to know where you are.

      Such an area doesn't exist, except in your imagination.

      (And Drawing an 8 foot radius around a particular business that made money on groupon and calling that a "local area" doesn't count.)

    6. Re:There is no "inability" by AdrianKemp · · Score: 1

      I assumed you were a moron, but thanks for confirming it!

    7. Re:There is no "inability" by vux984 · · Score: 1

      Really? Is that the best argument for "most businesses in your area actually make money directly from groupon" that you can come up with?

      I guess it was.

    8. Re:There is no "inability" by Tamerlin · · Score: 1

      So yes, you're right; there's a good reason that the only deals you end up seeing on Groupon are bad for the business owners... it's because Groupon doesn't run deals that ARE good for the business owners. They only businesses that could benefit from Groupon deals are really mass-market, volume-orientede business that don't have high margins. Boutique business really shouldn't bother with Groupon.

  47. Groupon is for Marketing by whatnever · · Score: 1

    I couldn't find the video, otherwise I'd put the link here, but a few months ago, I saw a video by 3 customers of Groupon: scuba dive shop, steak restaurant, and cupcake shop. Basically, Groupon takes 50% of the coupon value. So, if a merchant gives 50% off retail on the coupon, they only get 25% of retail. The cupcake shop experienced the same thing as this baker, but revised his idea of what Groupon is and is using it successfully. He now thinks Groupon is marketing with associated costs and just budgets accordingly. He also put some stipulations on the coupon: 1. No choice of flavors, you get what he has in stock and they choose what you get. 2. You must notify him advance (2 days), if you have a big order.

    I just don't understand why Groupon doesn't set expectations properly with their merchants. When these bad things happen, all 3 (Groupon, Merchant, Customers) lose. Groupon loses follow-on business from the Merchant. Merchant gets overwhelmed and a bad reputation. Customers get a bad product or experience. If Groupon sets the expectations properly, I don't see why all three can't have a good experience. I assume the Groupon sales people are just pushing volume and don't have any training. But it should make sense that by setting expectations properly and coaching the Merchants, that Groupon would have follow-on business from the Merchant -- a much better business model than pushing a one-shot coupon.

    1. Re:Groupon is for Marketing by afabbro · · Score: 2

      I just don't understand why Groupon doesn't set expectations properly with their merchants. When these bad things happen, all 3 (Groupon, Merchant, Customers) lose. Groupon loses follow-on business from the Merchant.

      ...and I think that's the disconnect. I don't think Groupon is a "built to last" kind of company. They are a "built to IPO" kind of company. Eventually they will run out of merchants who'll try their service, but by then Groupon will long since be out of business.

      --
      Advice: on VPS providers
    2. Re:Groupon is for Marketing by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Not that I'm faulting your friend, its his/her business to do with what they please ... but ...

      He also put some stipulations on the coupon: 1. No choice of flavors, you get what he has in stock and they choose what you get. 2. You must notify him advance (2 days), if you have a big order.

      That is exactly why I think anyone who buys shit from Groupon is an idiot. The 'deals' are pretty asstastic unless you happen to fit their agenda perfectly, and their agenda is almost universally the bad one, unless you happen to run into a first timer on Groupon which means you'll probably get what appears to be a good deal until you get to the actual deal part and find them overloaded like this cupcake place.

      Basically Groupon is fad thats sucking people into to bad deals. Seriously, you get a great 'discount' to buy the cupcakes that NO ONE ELSE WANTED TO BUY. Thats not a good deal. All of their crap is like that.

      Groupon will go away for that same reason, they aren't giving good deals, just cheap prices, what you get is actually pretty shitty, for any number of differing reasons, but all of which relate to the experience you're going to have JUST BECAUSE it was groupon.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    3. Re:Groupon is for Marketing by madhi19 · · Score: 1

      Yeah it pretty much a bait and switch business model site like that come and go they either get gobbled up by Amazon and the rest of the big fish or disappear once the hype is over.

    4. Re:Groupon is for Marketing by neonKow · · Score: 1

      If this were true, why would they turn down a buyout offer from Google? I think the founders really think they can do well with this model. And I, for one, would love to see this industry mature into something that ends up actually being a sustainable model.

      Just because the interests of Groupon and the local businesses are at odds with one another doesn't mean that they can't come to an equilibrium that works for both parties (and for us, the customers).

  48. stick to baking by argStyopa · · Score: 1

    ...perhaps she should hire a BUSINESS partner, since she may be a terrific baker but crappy businessperson?

    Doesn't take a PhD to say "let's say we offer a 75% discount....what sort of hit might we take?"

    --
    -Styopa
  49. Groupon made how much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Groupon made how much off this sale? I understand that Groupon takes a cut off of each sale for it's self so wouldn't that mean it is against it's best interest to do any kind of limiting of orders.

    http://www.groupon.com/business-faq

    So she really didn't even make the 6.50 on each sale, did she? Read this about how this one company actually had to pay Groupon 50% of what it made. http://posiescafe.com/wp/?p=316

  50. It works for lessons by Animats · · Score: 1

    I know one business which has good results with Groupon. It's a riding school (horses). The Groupon lessons are an introduction to riding, with about an hour on the ground grooming and learning about horses, and an hour on the horse. Groupon insures that enough people sign up to make up a profitable group, and Groupon pays for no-shows in bad weather. This insures that each lesson brings in a known income. Some of the people discover they like horses and come back for more lessons. But even without that, it's profitable.

    This is the right way to use Groupon - not as a traffic builder, but for something that's done in a group.

    1. Re:It works for lessons by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Groupon doesn't 'pay' for no shows. They 'paid' when they bought the groupon coupon.

      Groupon is just pay in advance, nothing else.

      The 'right' way to use Groupon is to not use Groupon at all.

      Its a horrible rip off for everyone involved EXCEPT groupon, who takes a cut because ... well just because people are stupid and following website fads. Best part is that what you 'buy' from groupon is so filled with retarded restrictions or ADDITIONAL fees that by the time its done with you feel like you've been ripped off.

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
    2. Re:It works for lessons by EmagGeek · · Score: 1

      Does Groupon underwrite all of this insurance you're talking about, and is there a deductible for the seller if the deal becomes unprofitable?

      I'm concerned as an investor whether Groupon has 100% liability on this insurance or if they have an external underwriter and pay a more traditional premium.

      Oh wait, you meant "ensure," didn't you?

  51. Advertising is not free by sunking2 · · Score: 2

    This is a bit like buying a TV ad and complaining that it is costing you money for the airtime. The idea behind groupon is that you attract new customers with crazy low one time prices. Of course it may cost money. Advertising always does. In the end all she should care about is whether or not she adds enough extra customers to purchase more than $20k, or whatever her costs were do to this promotion, later on down the road.

  52. I Love Lucy by 3arwax · · Score: 0

    I am remembering an episode on I Love Lucy where they were selling salad dressing. THE MILLION DOLLAR IDEA Episode #79, Aired January 11, 1954

  53. Yes it is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spend several very pleasant days fantasizing about what life would be like if you do win. Seen that way, it isn't a bad bargain at all

    Sure it is. I can fantasize just as effectively for free, and have about the same chance of my fantasies being realized.

  54. Bakers don't own computers? by paiute · · Score: 1

    This is a problem well-known to those considering participating in Groupon. A minute on the web would have forewarned her that there could be a problem of scale. She could have limited the offering.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
  55. Caveat venditor by Etz+Haim · · Score: 1

    Let the seller beware.

  56. Classic Newbie Mistake by JSBiff · · Score: 2

    When you run the 75% off sale, you are supposed to first mark the price up by 150-200%. Nub got pwned.

  57. And so... by roc97007 · · Score: 1

    ...a lesson was learned. Will they be an examples for others?

    --
    Oliver's law of assumed responsibility: If you're seen fixing it, you will be blamed for breaking it.
  58. There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupcakes by raehl · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because you're buying them for an "occasion".

    If you are tasked with providing dessert, stopping at wal-mart on the way to whatever occasion it is to pick up a dozen cupcakes for under $10 is tacky.

    But if you stop at the "gourmet" Cupcake place and spend $40 on "special" cupcakes, that's OK.

    You're really paying for the ability to buy your way out of having to actually bake without the social stigma of being too cheap/lazy.

  59. Note: by raehl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not that I would ever do such a thing. I tend to avoid hanging out with people who would assign social consequence to buying the Wal-Mart cupcakes. But lots of people who don't operate that way.

    1. Re:Note: by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

      I do to, but bring crap beer to my house and we're going to have a problem ;)

  60. Analysis not complete... by raehl · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...What's the price of advertising in all the newspapers etc that are covering this story?

  61. Groupon is a simple scam by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The obviousness of Groupons scam is obvious enough to most but the more subtle one is the lie of advertising. Advertising does NOT work as advertised. That is something to remember, advertising is a product SOLD by advertising agencies. So the companies telling you advertising works because they studied it are advertising companies... conflict of interests?

    You have two basics forms of advertising. The first people barely think about but is putting your products and your shop on display. It is not just the sign above your door but prices on your products. Think about this simple thing, did you EVER walk out of store because you couldn't find the price so thought "fuck this". BAD advertising. A lot about this basic advertising is convincing people to enter your shop because they think that what they want can be got at an acceptable price. For stores like bakeries this means charging the right amount for the right amount of convenience and quality. People complain about Starbucks being to expensive but they got fast steady quality service (compared to all the other alternatives at premium locations. I can get a cup at a burger chain for less next door at say Utrecht Central station in Holland but GOD the burger joints service is piss poor).

    But if you want MORE customers then pass by traffic. What do you do... advertise? Do you READ advertisements? No? To busy. Exactly. Anyone that can afford a 5 dollar cup cake is far to busy to read the local newspaper. Same with banner ads. Who here sees banner ads? If you see banner ads, you are in a lower class. Elitist? Damn right.

    Research has shown the Groupon's claims on age and income of their users are over-estimated. They are an older demographic and a poorer demographic. This is a group who hunts coupon's. They use a coupon and then don't come back unless they get another coupon. They are deal hunters.

    If you got something to dump, then deal hunters might be worth going after but if you got a premium product that doesn't get 75% cheaper in total costs with bulk, then Groupon makes no sense.

    Groupon works for HP Printers because HP makes its money on ink. It makes sense for products you need to shift now and you got to much off or make a very high margin on but otherwise, it NEVER makes sense.

    Food products and services do not work with massive discounts aimed at bargain hunters.

    It would be like selling Rolls Royce at 75% discount hoping for repeat business.

    Not only do people not NEED two of them but those who buy it at the discount can't afford the regular price AND at the same time you are diluting the price of your product for your regular customers.

    Or how would you feel if the person in front of you paid 1/4th of the price charged to you? If I was in that store behind a groupon customer and they tried to charge me full price they would be picking cupcakes out of their ears.

    A european chain stunts with taxless days, basically a 20% cut that amounts to the regular sales tax. So... I never buy from them unless they run one of these events because I can wait for them or another chain to run one when buying a TV or such. Turn your customers into bargain hunters and bargains they will hunt.

    Stay away from advertising unless you truly and fully understand what it is going to cost and what it is going to deliver you. It is like gambling. Or lawsuits. Casino's, lawyers and advertisers ALWAYS win.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  62. And that's not even the real problem... by raehl · · Score: 1

    ...the way you make Groupon work is you offer a deal that gets a customer in the door so you can sell them something else.

    For example, a restaurant might offer a $20 food for $10 groupon. The restaurant gets $5 from the groupon, but hope you buy $40 in food and drink, and bring some friends with you, so they might get $80-$100 in full-price sales because of the $15-off groupon.

    Another example is spas or photographers - offer a 50% off groupon for a basic service, then when the customer is in, upgrade them to more services.

    But, if you've sold so many groupons that your entire operating capacity is eaten up just fulfilling the groupons, then you have no capacity for upsells, and you've killed your ability to upsell and thus make the groupon work for your business.

    This business owner should have done a coupon for a half dozen cupcakes, limited it to a reasonable amount of groupons, then always tried to upsell the redeemer to a full dozen or two dozen cupcakes, and they might have made some money.

  63. I doubt she's complaining any more... by motd2k · · Score: 1

    I suspect that with the loss came publicity that's going to prove to be worth FAR more than £20,000. The fact that you and me are talking about her small bakery in the UK is testament to that.

  64. Good On Her by DiabolicallyRandom · · Score: 2

    I think the neat thing here being glossed over is that she actually followed through on this, even going above and beyond to hire extra staff to meet demand. She could have easily played the "while supplies last" card, or done any number of other "shady" things to try and avoid fulfilling all of the requests. I know for a fact if this had happened somewhere around where I live, the proprietor would have fed a line of bullshit and invalidated the coupons or some crap.

    1. Re:Good On Her by BitZtream · · Score: 1

      Its really hard to sell someone something and then say 'well we ran out'. See thats the thing with groupon, you've already BOUGHT the product, she MUST provide it or she's running a scam, intentionally or not, it is what it is.

      She had no problem agreeing to sell X number of items instantly, only seems to have a problem actually producing those items.

      Groupon lets you limit total sales, sells per period and all sorts of other things so she could have provided proper safegaurds on herself so she could keep up with demand, but she didn't. She over promised, under delivered and no she's bitching about it.

      She must be a politician eh?

      --
      Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  65. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by Sleepy · · Score: 0

    There's that, and the fact that the Walmart cupcakes were made using Chinese flour, in a Mexican bakery, and then shipped 2000 miles by a non-union trucker who was only permitted 6 hours rest before resuming his driving shift.

    PS - the meat you get at a local butchery is also way better quality than Wal-mart's.

  66. Seeing the situation positively by fran6gagne · · Score: 1

    On an other sight, she can see this as an add campaign that costed 20k pounds and that bring more than 8500 customers to her bakery. In those 8500 there might be a lot of new customers and of those there will be a part that may become new regular customers. So if this loss traduce in a sale increase in the long term, what appear here as bad move now may become a good one later.

    Does anybody working in publicity could us tell if a 40k add campaing that bring 8500 customers to a bakery would have done well for the price?

  67. I call bullshit. by secondhand_Buddah · · Score: 1

    I call bullshit. 6 pounds 50 should easily cover the cost of making 12 cup cakes - especially if you are making 102 000 of them.......

    --
    Participatory Governance : The only feasible option for a real democracy, where everyone really does have a say.
    1. Re:I call bullshit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that she doesn't get 6 pounds 50 - half goes to Groupon and so she gets 3 pounds 25. If you add ingredient cost (and good quality ingredients are not cheap - industry rates typically run 30%), then add labour, packaging, rent, utilities, etc, etc, etc. Then she's loosing money - lots of it.

  68. Marks my words by Gordo_1 · · Score: 1

    It's only a matter of time before GRPN and their fancy IPO are dead in the water.

    The vast majority of these Groupon deals are good for Groupon and no one else. Combine that with the fact that there are no obvious barriers to entry for their business model and there's a limited window for them to prey on idiot small business owners before word spreads that Groupon deals are not good for business and their company will be reeling soon enough.

    Oh and yes, I really do emphasize *idiot* small business owners... You don't need a PhD in Economics to figure out that if you offer a discount in which you lose money on each transaction and don't set an upper limit to the number of transactions, your risk is not bounded.

  69. She had no obligation to increase production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You don't have to set any special limits on the offer. If you produce your normal amount of cupcakes for the day it is reasonable to say "sorry, we're out of cupcakes" when you run out. There is no legal or moral obligation to make more and especially not to hire staff to meet demand.

        She could have easily turned this to her advantage by posting a sign saying "We've doubled (tripled, whatever is reasonable) our cupcake output but we can only make X per day. If we're out, you are welcome to try one of our delicious cakes or come in bright and early tomorrow for a cupcake. First come, first serve." This would have satisfied most reasonable people and would likely increase business without any massive expense. As for the unreasonable people, you can't satisfy them and they probably just came in for the deal anyway and would not be a returning customer.

  70. Re:cut off? Re:And the moral of today's story is.. by PraiseBob · · Score: 1

    They can claim they approach each business differently and try to help, etc etc. But I'd dealt directly with groupon's salespeople a number of times. They ALWAYS want an unlimited deal, and always ask for a higher percentage of the total profits if you want to set a limit. I think they must get a bonus if they bring unlimited deals in.

  71. Regarding just the cooking side... by pkinetics · · Score: 2

    I'm mostly curious to what people's experience is

    How many people bake? I mean real pastry baking, not the prepackaged mix.

    How many people have been to a cupcake shop? I have a couple in my area, but they also make cakes.

    I love to cook, in almost all forms: Cooking, grilling, frying, roasting, and baking.

    I now some people are excellent at baking, and horrible at the rest, or horrible at baking but exceptional at the rest.

    Baking is a more precise science. Everything has to be properly measured. Simple variations in ingredients or processing can have profound results.

    There is a huge difference between All Purpose Flour versus Cake Flour; Instant Yeast versus Cake Yeast. And then there is the knowledge of how it all goes together.

    Throw in frosting, and piping on whatever little decorations go onto the cake.

    Now take the cupcake. It is smaller, has more surface area, and requires more manual labor (frosting is a pain unless you are really good at it).

    Cupcakes are the least forgiving. It is a cake, that is not a cake. It dries out significantly faster than a regular cake due to its increased surface area. Even if the cupcake is perfect coming out of the oven, it probably will not be after several hours in a display case. And its not like a cake store wants to sell day old cupcakes. The frosting picks up aromas and what nots just sitting around. They are either given away or thrown out.

    In other words... cupcakes are a royal pain in the arse...

  72. Re:cut off? Re:And the moral of today's story is.. by JBMcB · · Score: 1

    I know several people who have dealt with Groupon, and Groupon was careful about setting reasonable limits with each of them. I guess YMMV depending on your sales rep.

    --
    My Other Computer Is A Data General Nova III.
  73. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by geminidomino · · Score: 1

    If you are tasked with providing dessert, stopping at wal-mart on the way to whatever occasion it is to pick up a dozen cupcakes for under $10 is tacky.

    Life lesson: I never share a meal with anyone who uses the word 'tacky' to mean anything other than 'weakly adhesive.' It helps the digestion immensely.

  74. Stupidly high discount by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can't imagine why anyone would offer such a discount in the first place, through Groupon or otherwise.

    Sure if it's end of line, end of the day, and therefore more about clearing inventory for which you might otherwise getting nothing, yes but not as core business.

    Most people would assume you aren't losing money on the deal, so such a huge discount you are effectively saying that normally you are vastly overpriced.
    Those who care about getting a "premium" product and saving a large amount as a one off, almost certainly isn't your target market, if the buying decision is largely influenced by price they aren't suddenly going to start regularly paying 4 times as much.

    So you potentially tell your target buyers that the product you sell is overpriced and they could get the equivalent cheaper elsewhere, it isn't the premium product they thought it was, whilst attracting in a load of others who are unlikely to make further purchases at your regular price.

    Seems a bad idea all round.

    1. Re:Stupidly high discount by crakbone · · Score: 1

      Groupon has limits it can put on the amount sold, the owner should have thought about max capacity and sold under it. I'm also sure she totaled into the loss is the amount she did not make up in normal sales. Also most Groupons are good for a year, that is a long time to be able to make cupcakes. She should have put in a quota system on how many groupons she would book in one week and broke up the rest across the year. 200 cupcakes a week does not sound all that bad. Also if you put them off a bit people have a tendency to forget they have a groupon or lose it.

  75. I suspect Groupon has some untruthful salespeople by GWBasic · · Score: 1

    From reading some of the linked blog entries, it sounds like some of Groupon's salespeople are lying to businesses or are being more pushy then the CEO intends. Perhaps Groupon has some salespeople who flat out lie to businesses who need to set sales limits? Things like this happen when a company grows very fast.

  76. cupcake groupon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amen. I did a cupcake groupon, and although I don't have to make 100.000 cupcakes, I am still feeling the sting. I was so not prepared and was not coached in any way, a bad decision and have met some of the worst and best people out there. The stress caused me to lose 20 lbs rapidly. I know there are alot of them that wont come back because they just want the deal. Its a hard lesson to learn. You only think about the advertising and the exposure hoping it will bring new customers. Its really not all its cracked up to be.

    1. Re:cupcake groupon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I did a cupcake groupon, and although I don't have to make 100.000 cupcakes, I am still feeling the sting. I was so not prepared and was not coached in any way, a bad decision and have met some of the worst and best people out there. The stress caused me to lose 20 lbs rapidly.

      If you make a lot of cupcakes you probably eat a fair few, so chances are you were too fat anyway.

  77. It's a good thing... by Leuf · · Score: 1

    It's a good thing the offer expired before she hit the 640k limit.

    1. Re:It's a good thing... by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      640k cupcakes oughta be enough for anyone. Even fat Linux using losers.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  78. What happened to men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seriously, arguing about cupcakes and coffee? My grandpa would of slapped me in the face.

  79. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by Darinbob · · Score: 1

    You could stop at Walmart and buy their cupcakes, then remove them from the box and put them in your own containers. If your friends are looking for the label in order to judge you then maybe find better friends. This is essentially the American equivalent of the $40 melons in Japan, they're being bought in order to show that you can afford them.

  80. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beautifully and accurately said.

  81. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by eepok · · Score: 1

    I find this genuinely intriguing. If I'm cheap and lazy then I will be cheap and lazy... and confident:

    "Yeah, I couldn't be bothered to spend 2 hours making small iced cakes for our potluck nor did I think it worthwhile to spend $39 on a dozen cupcakes when I could just get a Costco cake for a tenner. I see you brought fried chicken from Albertson's. Lemme get in on some of that..."

    See? People confident about the insecurities derived from assumed social expectations help other people feel comfortable about their insecurities.

    But that doesn't mean I don't understand. Some people feel very self-conscious about how they think they will be perceived. Some of those people have little choice but to associate with people who are genuinely judgmental about such frivolity. To them, I say, "Buy the $39 cupcakes and swap them out with the Sam's Club special. Keep the expensive ones for yourself just to spite those who would seek to evaluate you on the basis of the complimentary food you provide to others."

  82. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by webheaded · · Score: 1

    Quite honestly, if the people at the party I'm going to are too good for the $10 cupcakes, they can go to hell. Given the option, I'd probably buy 2 boxes of the $10 cupcakes, spend $20 less, and everyone would be happy.

    --
    "Those who would sacrifice essential liberties for a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - BenF
  83. Story correction - Marketing by MikeBabcock · · Score: 1

    They did not lose $20k ... they spent $20k on marketing. If you're in business and you don't understand spending money on marketing your product, you're probably not a very big business.

    No matter what you may believe on the subject, marketing can make or break a business, and good marketing is often worth spending a lot of money on. Just ask Coke, Pepsi, Dominos Pizza, Apple, etc.

    It costs you $20k to fill orders at a loss for which your hope is that many of those people will either want to buy more at full price or create buzz about your product among their friends and associates. Eventually it will either pay off or not, but the immediate cost isn't worth discussing as though it were burned money.

    --
    - Michael T. Babcock (Yes, I blog)
  84. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by BitZtream · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, if you knew anything about walmart you'd know that it most likely came from the same town, certainly within 100 miles of the store. Even with American's requiring overpay to do menial jobs, its still cheaper to bake locally than ship across an ocean. We have automation for the bakery and can the truck still has to drive them in from somewhere so we don't buy food from overseas.

    On the other hand, guess where most American beef ends up? Not in the US!

    P.S. Before you bitch about walmart, get a clue about whats really going on, bitch about the things they do wrong, not the the things you're too ignorant to realize they do right.

    --
    Persistent Volume manager for Kubernetes - https://github.com/dwimsey/openshift-pvmanager
  85. Or you can go to an actual gourmet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You can go to some trendy store, but if you know an actual gourmet (and I do), you can get much better stuff. I bought grandma a $200 sheet cake. Rip off? Nope. It had three layers and was elegantly decorated and carefully filled. I let them make most of the artistic choices (I believe I asked to "decorate it with flowers or something" but they really went all out with a special arrangement of cut fruits and flowers made of icing and such). The cake itself tasted exceptionally good.

    It was *not* the same as some crappy grocery store sheet cake, which would've been the same as using a mix. But this guy trained for 25 years. He's an actual, professional chef. And his skill was worth it. Everyone who attended that party remembers the cake more than anything else....

    In short, I don't doubt that there are people selling overpriced crap, but don't discount the fact that there are people out there who are really good at what they do.

    1. Re:Or you can go to an actual gourmet by gmhowell · · Score: 1

      In other news, the Emperor's new clothes look maahhhhhvelous.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  86. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by MBGMorden · · Score: 1

    I'm pretty much the same way. Heck my pantry is chock full of store-brand stuff because that's pretty much all I buy. For the most part it all tastes pretty darned close to each other. This is compounded even more when you're buying basic ingredients. In the target shooting community when people get to talking too much about tricking out their guns, there's a saying (and pardon me if this is perceived as racist): "It's the Indian, not the arrow that makes the difference.".

    Heck when it comes to traditional southern cooking my grandmother was pretty much the best cook I ever knew, and her cabinet was filled with nothing but Piggly Wiggly brand stuff.

    --
    "People who think they know everything are very annoying to those of us who do."-Mark Twain
  87. Groupon is a terrible idea for small businesses... by Krokus · · Score: 1

    Groupon itself suffers no risk thanks to its business model. The clients, on the other hand, end up providing their services at 75% off (50% off from the client, plus Groupon takes half of the remaining 50%). In addition, the client gains no real benefit; the majority of any new customers they may get are stingy coupon-clippers who generally refuse to pay normal price for anything. In some service-based businesses, this may even include people who simply refuse to pay for the service done.

  88. Re:Diamond Dog Collar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sitting down? Because I have some shocking news for you. It was really an actor pretending to buy the expensive necklace. Just an actor, reading a script. About a fake diamond dog collar. It was all fake.

  89. Moral of the story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Stop making groupon sales below your per unit break even threshold, and add a line about subject to back order and availability blah blah blah. You wont make a profit in the long run, but no one can cry foul when it takes time for there cupcakes/other products to be ready. You get your name out there, people get a deal on your product, every one goes home happy.

    This isn't the first groupon sale to go to hell and back, and god help us, it wont be the last.

  90. Try ordering a beer in Germany by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    After having been to some countries that don't tip compulsory, I sometimes really wish they'd introduce it. London wasn't bad, Japan had good service, but I really, really want to explain the custom of "bribery" to German waitresses. I'm sick of the times I've sat at a table of people with empty glasses wanting another beer while the waitress sat around and talked to the bartender. Once she gets your order, they stand around and talk some more. Eventually, they'll get around to brining you your God damned beer.

    Meanwhile, you don't have to tip, but it is expected with expected service. Bad service deserves bad tips. This is usually included into the price of whatever you are buying in the form of the pay the service industry gets. I've been a waiter and a pizza delivery driver. I know what those people go through and usually tip well, but also have no compulsion to tip for bad service. I also know that they recognize return customers who are good tippers and give them the best service.

    1. Re:Try ordering a beer in Germany by TheLink · · Score: 1

      They don't want to sell you a beer, don't buy one from them. There are plenty of places that sell beer in Germany.

      The Germans can't be having such a big problem getting their beers. It's common for many to have a beer with lunch even on workdays.

      --
  91. No Other Option by painandgreed · · Score: 1

    With the death of print such as local newspapers and magazines, they are becoming one of the few ways to advertise. While Google is getting better and better with targeting advertising on websites, most people spend lots of effort to make sure they never even see it. The problem with groupon seems to be that they do not advertise to the general population which you want because you might get further business, but rather to a population of cheapskates who will never return. Unless targeted localized advertising on the web becomes easy for the small business (at least as easy as Gorupon), then Groupon has a large selection of marks to fleece.

  92. For a directed advertisement the ratio is not bad by drolli · · Score: 1

    Getting the directed message out to 8000 possible customers for $20000 is pretty cheap. Local Ads are expensive and difficult.

  93. name brand boutique bakeries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You need to find a good quality local bakery. For example in San Jose there is Aki's Bakery and Dick's Bakery. Aki's is known for their great cupcakes (especially guava) and Dick's is known for burnt almond cake which is sold through a few dozen local restaurants, but you can order them for pick up as well. The pastries and cakes at these two places are not cheap, but cheaper than trendy boutique cupcakes and infinitely better. I once bought some cupcakes from Crumbs in Chicago, it was the first time in my life that I didn't bother finishing a cupcake due to boredom.

    I don't know about you, but I trust a bakery more if someone put their own name on it.

  94. 500+ replies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Damn, there's a whole crapload of people on Slashdot who like them some cupcakes.

  95. NPR Planet Money covered groupon well by ChefJoe · · Score: 1

    IIRC the team at Planet Money pointed out that, in general, groupon keeps about half of what money they do collect. There is negotiation involved and Groupon tries to make the most astounding deal possible. She obviously failed at using any negotiation skills. If she offered her cupcakes at a 75% discount 26*(1-0.75) she was only pocketing around 3.25 after groupon took its cut. The Planet Money story is actually a really interesting discussion on price discrimination and the origins of couponing in general. http://www.npr.org/blogs/money/2011/04/08/135244697/groupons-secret-everybody-has-their-price

  96. Silly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Any offers like that need to be limited to a certain number in the small print..

  97. Promotion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isn't the point of groupon to get repeat customers by getting a crazy number of other customers in the door using some crazy offer?
    And how much publicity is she getting for free from this?
    Just sayin :)

  98. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by Meski · · Score: 1

    You forgot to mention the thousands of kittens they kill each year to make them, too...

    Then again, that's a positive.

  99. Don't know but... by LostMyBeaver · · Score: 1

    I bought a piece of Orea Dream Cake from Deli Deluca in Oslo, Norway last night and it was $10. That's a little high, but pretty reasonable based on the fact that a dozen eggs here costs $8.

  100. A fool and his money are soon parted by RockDoctor · · Score: 1

    In this case, the fools being the ones paying £26 for a dozen cakes. But then again, they're idiots who haven't got out of London, so they're probably not worth worrying about.

    --
    Birds are not dinosaur descendants;birds are dinosaurs, for all useful meanings of "birds", "are" and "dinosaurs"
  101. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You're really paying for the ability to buy your way out of having to actually bake without the social stigma of being too cheap/lazy."

    I agree, there is some social factor most people have to take into account (the lazy/cheap) argument. But you would be stupid to buy the 'same' cakes for 30 dollars more, just because you have shitty crappy asocial friends who will judge you on the cakes you buy and how expensive those are. That are the same kind of people who think that higher payed jobs are better jobs and also a bigger car makes you richer.

    Bleh

  102. Money sense, lotto players lack. by Firethorn · · Score: 1

    Man, a million doesn't stretch as far as it used too...

    The point wasn't to get to be a 'super rich multi-millionaire'. The point was to have money to retire on. In many cases, if people invested their money instead of buying lotto tickets, they'd have a pretty decent retirement. And, as Tyler mentioned - the marginal utility/'happiness' of a dollar does decrease the more you have. Money, after a certain point, doesn't buy happiness.

    Back on lotto winners - there's plenty of evidence that most lotto winner's money skills are worse than average, given that the majority of multi-million winners end up declaring bankruptcy within 5 years of winning, and by 7-10 years most are back in the same financial situation as they were before winning.

    --
    I don't read AC A human right
  103. Holy Sh%& by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For that price they better be "special" cupcakes

  104. Re:There's a reason you spend $39 on a dozen cupca by EastCoastSurfer · · Score: 1

    Heck my pantry is chock full of store-brand stuff because that's pretty much all I buy. For the most part it all tastes pretty darned close to each other.

    I'm with you here. Some store brand stuff isn't very good, but at least try it to find out. It's usually so inexpensive it doesn't matter. And those shopper cards. It's a whole new game for me. Nothing even gets in the cart that isn't on sale. Not on sale means I find an equivalent and is on sale or I skip it that week. I don't have the time or desire to extreme coupon, but it is a fun game to see how much I can save on a single $100 grocery store trip. So far my best has been $42 + the 2% cash back from the AMEX :)