If you don't show examples of non-science, how will any child learn to discern the difference?
Creationism is not a theory because, among other reasons, it makes no predictions. To call Creationism a theory is to call a description of a modern factory a theory. Theories never describe "what" other than to set context.
If you never explain this in a science classroom, you will propagate the exact circumstances that lead to the story will are all posting about.
I used email support from MS to fix Windows Update on my home machine. Didn't cost me anything but time. I still have those emails archived, just in case I come across the issue again.
You realize that if the parents forced their 13 year old daughter to strip under any circumstances they'd be in jail for the rest of their lives on sex abuse charges, right?
So because these rapists were stand-ins, it's suddenly OK?
I hope you die and that everyone you love is tortured to death before your eyes.
Schools cannot create law. They can only create rules.
What the school did was view a naked child against her will. They had no legal right, and any other private citizen doing this would have been in jail on rape and child pornography charges before they could blink.
The school administrators deserve to die. They have a zero-tolerance policy against drugs. I have a zero tolerance policy against rape.
It would have been completely reasonable for the girl to beat to death anyone who tried to force her to strip.
I don't care what the circumstances are. If an adult tries to force a girl to strip, that's rape. Rape victims are free to take any measures necessary to protect themselves, as far as I am concerned
Well, the logical and moral alternative to these laws would be to deny coverage to anyone involved in an accident if they were not wearing a seatbelt or helmet. If the victim does not care about his health enough to take these simple measures, there should be no requirement for anyone else to pay for their treatment.
Unfortunately, we live in a society where "personal responsibility" is anathema.
Yes, I honestly and completely believe it makes no difference who is voted into any political office (in the US). The only difference is in how you will be screwed, not whether.
In accordance with my beliefs, I have voted exactly once in the 13 years in which I have been eligible. And I voted for legalization of marijuana -- in other words, I voted for an issue, not a candidate.
Pretty much, yes. Can you name one that has not and has also survived to the present? I bet most such countries that you'd name are less than a few hundred years old (in their modern incarnations).
He should certainly not go to jail. That is simply not justice at all. He is directly responsible for several deaths. He contributes nothing, while at the same time ruining people's lives, not to mention ending them. He should be tortured to death. Over a period of about 10 years.
Judaism has never attempted (in an organized way) to wipe out any particular religion. About the closest you get is when invading the Land of Canaan, the Jews were commanded to wipe out the populous in order that they would not end up straying from their religion. But this was to prevent Jews from assimilating, and not due to a particular hate of the religion.
Christianity, on the other hand, is well known for missionary abuse all over the world.
You want Apple to allow or to implement client-side filtering because you're a lazy asshole? Do what everyone else does -- install spamassassin on your mail server.
Slashdot Mirror
If you don't show examples of non-science, how will any child learn to discern the difference?
Creationism is not a theory because, among other reasons, it makes no predictions. To call Creationism a theory is to call a description of a modern factory a theory. Theories never describe "what" other than to set context.
If you never explain this in a science classroom, you will propagate the exact circumstances that lead to the story will are all posting about.
You are both ignorant and stupid. A being is sexually mature when he or she can perform their part to procreate.
Being married and pregnant at 14 was very common before (Western) society decided sex was a sin.
Please explain how these are 1st Amendment violations of any kind. There is no law that religious institutions must accept non-profit status.
Granting tax-exemption is not a 1st amendment issue at all. It doesn't matter who or what is granted the status.
Willfully accepting a legal status which limits your speech is not a 1st amendment issue. There is no law which limits speech.
I think you are one of the poor deluded assholes who think that "Free Speech" means zero consequences.
Because Xserves won't run with commodity drives...
Except that the article clearly says that an XServe will work with them.
You missed 95 OSR2, so it's still 4th :)
I used email support from MS to fix Windows Update on my home machine. Didn't cost me anything but time. I still have those emails archived, just in case I come across the issue again.
Morons like you say that, but you're so obviously wrong you just come across as having negative intelligence.
Linus is the defacto program manager for a very large project involving thousands of people in hundreds of countries all over the world.
You many not like his style, but to say that he has the wrong temperament contradicts all the evidence to the contrary.
You realize that if the parents forced their 13 year old daughter to strip under any circumstances they'd be in jail for the rest of their lives on sex abuse charges, right?
So because these rapists were stand-ins, it's suddenly OK?
I hope you die and that everyone you love is tortured to death before your eyes.
I hope you are tortured to death while watching every female you care about being raped.
You are utterly disgusting.
Any parent forcing a strip search on a post-puberty child would be in jail for decades on sex-abuse charges.
What the school did is not forgivable. I only wish the news was about a case of justifiable homicide. The parents deserve real justice.
You are right. They should be simply killed.
A zero-tolerance policy against rape makes much more sense than one against drugs.
Schools cannot create law. They can only create rules.
What the school did was view a naked child against her will. They had no legal right, and any other private citizen doing this would have been in jail on rape and child pornography charges before they could blink.
The school administrators deserve to die. They have a zero-tolerance policy against drugs. I have a zero tolerance policy against rape.
It would have been completely reasonable for the girl to beat to death anyone who tried to force her to strip.
I don't care what the circumstances are. If an adult tries to force a girl to strip, that's rape. Rape victims are free to take any measures necessary to protect themselves, as far as I am concerned
As humans are natural, anything we do is natural. Global Warming isn't a problem for the planet. It's a problem for us.
Well, the logical and moral alternative to these laws would be to deny coverage to anyone involved in an accident if they were not wearing a seatbelt or helmet. If the victim does not care about his health enough to take these simple measures, there should be no requirement for anyone else to pay for their treatment.
Unfortunately, we live in a society where "personal responsibility" is anathema.
You are also likely single with no dependents. Try raising a family for even a few years with only half a million saved to cover medical.
Yes, I honestly and completely believe it makes no difference who is voted into any political office (in the US). The only difference is in how you will be screwed, not whether.
In accordance with my beliefs, I have voted exactly once in the 13 years in which I have been eligible. And I voted for legalization of marijuana -- in other words, I voted for an issue, not a candidate.
Pretty much, yes. Can you name one that has not and has also survived to the present? I bet most such countries that you'd name are less than a few hundred years old (in their modern incarnations).
There's no room for this in our understanding of physics.
And if we don't understand it, it can't happen or must not exist?
You are an idiot. I've decided this of my own free will.
As others have posted, it's not actually treason. However, it's also true that treason is not the only crime whose punishment should be death.
He should certainly not go to jail. That is simply not justice at all. He is directly responsible for several deaths. He contributes nothing, while at the same time ruining people's lives, not to mention ending them. He should be tortured to death. Over a period of about 10 years.
Judaism has never attempted (in an organized way) to wipe out any particular religion. About the closest you get is when invading the Land of Canaan, the Jews were commanded to wipe out the populous in order that they would not end up straying from their religion. But this was to prevent Jews from assimilating, and not due to a particular hate of the religion.
Christianity, on the other hand, is well known for missionary abuse all over the world.
You want Apple to allow or to implement client-side filtering because you're a lazy asshole? Do what everyone else does -- install spamassassin on your mail server.
They could do that. And if they did, they'd pass that on to consumers at the time of sale, which would increase the purchase price.
Only a retarded shit, like most Apple-haters on slashdot, think that Apple would take a loss to satisfy their sense of entitlement.
You can. Jailbroken phones run sshd. You could port Apache if you'd like, but lighhtpd is more reasonable -- and has already been ported.