Apple will point to standard-equipment radios and state that car manufacturers have known for decades that they cause distractions which can have lead to death, yet they have never implemented a mechanism to lock out the driver. In fact, it's quite common for controls to be embedded in the steering wheel, which demonstrates that the manufacturers expect drivers to use them! And the manufacturers certainly can tell when the car is in motion. If car manufacturers aren't liable (and they aren't), neither is Apple.
You are a shit. A stupid, ignorant cunt. You don't deserve life.
Waze prevents drivers from using the app while the vehicle is in motion. Waze hasn't been sued by Apple. So obviously there are ways for others to implement the feature without running afoul of Apple's patent. So Apple didn't prevent anyone else from implementing the safety feature.
Unlike you, Apple realizes that technical solutions can't prevent shit-heads from doing stupid things. If it had been Hangouts, this story would have been about Google, because Waze actually has a feature to prevent drivers from using it while the vehicle is in motion, so why didn't Google add it to Hangouts?
The driver was distracted by FaceTime, not a competing product. That competitors couldn't implement the patented method is completely irrelevant. Your post, however, demonstrates that you have intelligence equal to that of the (dead) driver.
Or maybe they are smarter than a dead mouse, something which you are clearly not, and they know the feature would not work from the consumer's perspective. It's also completely foreseeable that someone fiddling with the radio can be distracted to the point of causing an accident. But car radios have been a thing for nearly a 100 years. You have no ability to think, and it shows.
Socialized medicine doesn't cover burial. Did you read the story, or even the summary? The family suing deserves every bad thing that can befall idiots, but they aren't suing for medical expenses. They are suing for wrongful death.
I think I've noticed one time when someone was video chatting while on a bus. Maybe. My memory may be playing tricks on me. Mostly, people don't give a shit what other people are doing, and you're just a whiny asshole.
And alcohol manufacturers don't prevent people from drinking while driving. Car manufacturers don't prevent drivers from changing the radio station. They even enable it by putting a radio in as standard equipment!
You are a fucked-up shit and it's a shame you weren't the victim.
The real issue here is that the person using the moniker geekmux wasn't aborted.
The only issue the court will look at is whether Apple forced, or even encouraged, the shit-head to use FaceTime while driving. That's it. As the answer is obviously "no", the court will find in Apple's favor.
Waze has a feature that prevents you from using the app while the vehicle is in motion. So obviously you're an ignorant shit who doesn't deserve to breath.
You are a retarded shit, and it's truly unfortunate you weren't a passenger in the car, because we might not have to deal with your drivel if you had been.
Especially the periodical volumes, which for some reason... we're not allowed to checkout, anyways.
Periodicals are easily destroyed by mishandling. Books, even softcovers, can handle quite a bit more of a beating. Also, some periodicals cost more per issue than some hardcovers.
I watched a presentation given by Kevlin Henney (videos on YT), in which he quotes someone (don't remember who) who claims that COM is one of the purest implementations of OOP ever. COM objects can't interact except through published interfaces, and one cannot even find out what kind of object one is communicating with.
MS has all sorts of faults, but they do actually understand computer science. They also have a very pragmatic side.
If you've ever driven in or around Miami, you'd be aware that having a human in the driver's seat is not necessarily saying the same thing as having a driver in the driver's seat. A computer-driven car just formalizes what is already a common state of affairs.
If you watched the video, you'd know that it wouldn't have helped in this case. That the vehicle in front stopped is not visible until after the car between it and the Tesla crashed into it.
Being an irrational bigot means not having to care about logic.
Apple is routinely acknowledged to be the best manufacturer when it comes to long-term support. It would be nice if they would encourage App developers to support older versions of iOS, but I don't really expect them to.
There's also no reason to believe that it is possible. Perhaps in a biological construct. Some day. But it's not going to happen in 35 years. Besides, it would have have to happen in less than 20 years for the robot to be of legal age. Or do we also assume that robots are legally whatever age we want them to be? What happens if one makes a robot that deliberately has the maturity of a child?
The 35 year timeframe is pure fantasy. Not even sci-fi.
Slashdot Mirror
Apple will point to standard-equipment radios and state that car manufacturers have known for decades that they cause distractions which can have lead to death, yet they have never implemented a mechanism to lock out the driver. In fact, it's quite common for controls to be embedded in the steering wheel, which demonstrates that the manufacturers expect drivers to use them! And the manufacturers certainly can tell when the car is in motion. If car manufacturers aren't liable (and they aren't), neither is Apple.
It's not surprising. You are an ignorant piece of shit and you are so stupid that you make the dead driver look like a genius.
You are a shit. A stupid, ignorant cunt. You don't deserve life.
Waze prevents drivers from using the app while the vehicle is in motion. Waze hasn't been sued by Apple. So obviously there are ways for others to implement the feature without running afoul of Apple's patent. So Apple didn't prevent anyone else from implementing the safety feature.
Unlike you, Apple realizes that technical solutions can't prevent shit-heads from doing stupid things. If it had been Hangouts, this story would have been about Google, because Waze actually has a feature to prevent drivers from using it while the vehicle is in motion, so why didn't Google add it to Hangouts?
The driver was distracted by FaceTime, not a competing product. That competitors couldn't implement the patented method is completely irrelevant. Your post, however, demonstrates that you have intelligence equal to that of the (dead) driver.
Or maybe they are smarter than a dead mouse, something which you are clearly not, and they know the feature would not work from the consumer's perspective. It's also completely foreseeable that someone fiddling with the radio can be distracted to the point of causing an accident. But car radios have been a thing for nearly a 100 years. You have no ability to think, and it shows.
Socialized medicine doesn't cover burial. Did you read the story, or even the summary? The family suing deserves every bad thing that can befall idiots, but they aren't suing for medical expenses. They are suing for wrongful death.
I think I've noticed one time when someone was video chatting while on a bus. Maybe. My memory may be playing tricks on me. Mostly, people don't give a shit what other people are doing, and you're just a whiny asshole.
And alcohol manufacturers don't prevent people from drinking while driving. Car manufacturers don't prevent drivers from changing the radio station. They even enable it by putting a radio in as standard equipment!
You are a fucked-up shit and it's a shame you weren't the victim.
The real issue here is that the person using the moniker geekmux wasn't aborted.
The only issue the court will look at is whether Apple forced, or even encouraged, the shit-head to use FaceTime while driving. That's it. As the answer is obviously "no", the court will find in Apple's favor.
Waze has a feature that prevents you from using the app while the vehicle is in motion. So obviously you're an ignorant shit who doesn't deserve to breath.
It's truly a shame you weren't the driver of that car. It would mean one less shit-head in the world.
You must not have been paying attention to the past 50 years.
You are a retarded shit, and it's truly unfortunate you weren't a passenger in the car, because we might not have to deal with your drivel if you had been.
Especially the periodical volumes, which for some reason... we're not allowed to checkout, anyways.
Periodicals are easily destroyed by mishandling. Books, even softcovers, can handle quite a bit more of a beating. Also, some periodicals cost more per issue than some hardcovers.
They are called 'The Gospels' and are collected in a book called 'The Bible' namely 'The New Testament' section.
Every single word of which was written after Jesus is supposed to have lived. It's almost as if you didn't even read the comment you responded to.
I watched a presentation given by Kevlin Henney (videos on YT), in which he quotes someone (don't remember who) who claims that COM is one of the purest implementations of OOP ever. COM objects can't interact except through published interfaces, and one cannot even find out what kind of object one is communicating with.
MS has all sorts of faults, but they do actually understand computer science. They also have a very pragmatic side.
If you've ever driven in or around Miami, you'd be aware that having a human in the driver's seat is not necessarily saying the same thing as having a driver in the driver's seat. A computer-driven car just formalizes what is already a common state of affairs.
If you could see that the car in front had stopped, you had x-ray vision. You stupid ass-fuck.
If you watched the video, you'd know that it wouldn't have helped in this case. That the vehicle in front stopped is not visible until after the car between it and the Tesla crashed into it.
You need to be raped by a wild boar and left to die, alone, in the woods.
What kind of retarded shit can't afford a $200K mortgage on $50K/year?
Apple owns sweatshops? Interesting. When did they diversify into manufacturing?
Being an irrational bigot means not having to care about logic.
Apple is routinely acknowledged to be the best manufacturer when it comes to long-term support. It would be nice if they would encourage App developers to support older versions of iOS, but I don't really expect them to.
There's also no reason to believe that it is possible. Perhaps in a biological construct. Some day. But it's not going to happen in 35 years. Besides, it would have have to happen in less than 20 years for the robot to be of legal age. Or do we also assume that robots are legally whatever age we want them to be? What happens if one makes a robot that deliberately has the maturity of a child?
The 35 year timeframe is pure fantasy. Not even sci-fi.
Probably a couple decades.