Slashdot Mirror


User: Dog-Cow

Dog-Cow's activity in the archive.

Stories
0
Comments
5,362
First seen
Last seen
Profile
(view on slashdot.org)

Comments · 5,362

  1. Re: Wow. on Stop Bashing GMO Food, Say 109 Nobel Laureates (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    The GMO-free food should be labelled: CONTAINS CARBON.

    Considering how many anti-GMO nuts are likely also scared by the idea of carbon, I think it would be a wonderful thing to do to their precious minds.

  2. Re:Wow. on Stop Bashing GMO Food, Say 109 Nobel Laureates (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    You are wrong. You will likely always be wrong, because that's the kind of stupid you are.

    If consumers want labelling, why do they buy stuff that isn't labelled? Such products exist, so it's not because they aren't available. Yet, the overwhelming majority ignore such products. Perhaps you are confusing your wants with everyone else's? Perhaps you shouldn't project so much. Your interactions with real people might improve.

  3. Re: Quit it already! on Stop Bashing GMO Food, Say 109 Nobel Laureates (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Human population has grown year-after-year for every one of the last 100 years. If GMO were such a big problem, we'd have seen some signs by now.

  4. Re:Quit it already! on Stop Bashing GMO Food, Say 109 Nobel Laureates (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    All foods are labelled already. You just have to learn to read between the lines. GMO-free foods are labelled as such and sold at a markup. All other foods presumably are or contain GMO ingredients. This presumption is obvious, because if they were GMO-free, they would be sold for more. The market has already given you the information you desire, but you're too stupid to see it.

  5. Re:Quit it already! on Stop Bashing GMO Food, Say 109 Nobel Laureates (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    Facts are confusing. You're mean!

  6. Re:Quit it already! on Stop Bashing GMO Food, Say 109 Nobel Laureates (nytimes.com) · · Score: 1

    So stop with all the labeling crap already. If people care, they will gravitate to products which are labeled. If they don't, and I would guess 99.999999999 of people on the planet don't, then most manufacturers won't bother. Once you get the Government involved, it's no longer the "consumers" who are being heard.

  7. We all wish you'd swim naked in the Ganges.

  8. There is no additional tracking that comes with the ads unless you actually interact with it.

  9. That's because you don't see much value in $50. While it's nice to be so well-off that you don't have to consider the price difference, not everyone is so lucky. Whether those to whom $50 is a significant amount should be signing up for Amazon Prime and buying one of these phones is an entirely different discussion.

  10. Re:For the hundredth time... on The Moral Dilemma of Driverless Cars: Save The Driver or Save The Crowd? · · Score: 1

    I wouldn't buy a car that broke all the time, pedestrians or no.

  11. New depths, no?

  12. It's too slow.

  13. Re:Some privacy more equal than other on Airbnb Has Sued Its Hometown Of San Francisco (cnn.com) · · Score: 1

    The First Amendment has nothing to do with compelling speech. And in any event, you are free to not rent via AirBnB. Now you aren't compelled to register. The end.

    Are you going to start complaining about the need to register as a corporation next? Or how about filing architectural plans before renovating?

  14. Re:100% libre laptop, please on Google Ponders About a Chromebook Pro (venturebeat.com) · · Score: 0

    99.9999999999999999 of users wouldn't even know what you're on about, never mind care.

  15. FB and YT? Did you graduate HS last year?

  16. Re:Unenforceable law is unenforceable on Russia Lawmakers Pass Spying Law That Requires Encryption Backdoors, Call Surveillance (dailydot.com) · · Score: 1

    The parents of idiots who spout shit like "Darwin's law will..." should be killed as punishment for not aborting when they had the chance.

  17. Re:Unenforceable law is unenforceable on Russia Lawmakers Pass Spying Law That Requires Encryption Backdoors, Call Surveillance (dailydot.com) · · Score: 1

    You seem to have issues anticipating the future. Are you, in fact, a dog?

    (On the internet, nobody knows you're a dog. Unless you post shit like that.)

  18. Re:We need to stop the abortion. it's just horribl on New Apps Let Women Obtain Birth Control Without Visiting a Doctor · · Score: 1

    Just because you don't know when something happened does not mean it didn't happen. There is still a moment of conception, if conception is defined as an egg becoming fertilized such that it will start to grow into a fetus. It doesn't matter what the process is. There is still a moment before the egg can grow into a fetus, and moment after which it will grow into a fetus. That moment is conception, even if you can't tell post facto when it occurred.

    Note: I am taking no position on whether life begins at that moment, only that such a moment does in fact exist.

    As to your ridiculous analogy regarding adulthood: no one is claiming that our laws regarding the transition from childhood to adulthood is based on a scientific evaluation of biological maturity.

  19. Re: We need to stop the abortion. it's just horrib on New Apps Let Women Obtain Birth Control Without Visiting a Doctor · · Score: 1

    I've been around /. a long time. Like most suffering from nostalgia, you remember a past that never was. Slashdot has always had discussions that veered away from pure science and technology. Without strict moderation, it's practically guaranteed to happen, as people like to digress.

  20. Re:We need to stop the abortion. it's just horribl on New Apps Let Women Obtain Birth Control Without Visiting a Doctor · · Score: 1

    Which bit would that be?

  21. Re:We need to stop the abortion. it's just horribl on New Apps Let Women Obtain Birth Control Without Visiting a Doctor · · Score: 1

    Really? Please quote the original Hebrew with your translation. I am sure it's original, as what you claim is written is not, in fact, written.

  22. Self-censorship is still censorship. It's just not wrong in any reasonable sense of the term.

  23. You are an illiterate shit face.

    I was able to navigate the web just fine from 1990...

    If you are one of the idiots who think the web is the internet, you deserve a slow and painful death from termites.

  24. Re: No App that depends on a Server is "Secure" on Battle of the Secure Messaging Apps: Signal Triumphs Over WhatsApp, Allo (theintercept.com) · · Score: 1

    And those like you deserve to have their faces ripped off and nailed to their parents genitals.

  25. Re:Hilarious on 'Headphone Jacks Are the New Floppy Drives' (daringfireball.net) · · Score: 1

    If releasing a phone model you don't own somehow breaks your selfie stick, I suppose you might have a claim.