In 2001 the first word is about twenty-five minutes into the film ("Here you are, sir. Main Level D."), and, in total, there is less than fourty minutes of dialogue. Most of the dialogue is trivial, too. Perhaps you should re-watch some of those, closer this time.
I used Galeon, which uses gecko to render stuff, so I don't know if these options actually exist in Mozilla. But, with Galeon, one can block images from a specific site. Why not just choose to block image from ad.doubleclick.net?
As men of breeding, sometimes men of wit, T'avoid great errors must the less commit; Neglect the rules each verbal critic lays, For not to know some trifles is a praise. Most critics, fond of some subservient art, Still make the whole depend upon a part: They talk of Principles, but Notions prize, And all to one lov'd folly sacrifice.
Says me, the founders of the US, and a whole boatload of philosophers. And people don't have a right to an education -- they have a right to learn. Also, I wasn't talking about the utilitarian value of *any* of this, like you seem to be. People are born with a right to speak freely; no government or other institution has the right to take that away from any of us. When they do, it is a crime against nature.
This is the egocentricity of the entirety of Englighenment thinking then. The right to speech exists INDEPENDENTLY of any government. Governments can choose to remove it, but they cannot choose to grant it because people have it when they are born.
I only do this when I am actually logged in. (su -, that is, not just su).
\[\033[0m\]--\[\033[1;31m\][\[\033[1;36m\]\u@\h\[\ 033[1;31m\]]\[\033[0m\]-\[\033[1;31m\][\[\033[1;33 m\]\w\[\033[1;31m\]]\[\033[0m\]-- \[\033[1;32m\] \$ \[\033[0m\]
The Supreme Court would beg to differ. After the case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, corporations were given the same rights as individuals under the fourteenth amendment. So, according to the Supreme Court, corporations are individuals. I think that sucks donkey balls, but until it goes to the court again (or there is an amendment -- not likely), we're stuck with it.
"Linux" isn't anything but a kernel. You can size a specific distribution however the hell you want, so I see no reason to complain. I built my own distro, and my/usr/share takes up 77M. Actually, my largest directory is/usr/src which takes up about 2GB right now. Of course, I there is the fact that I keep every source file to every program I've compiled, from the kernel, to glibc, to XFree86, to Blackbox. My point is, there are ways less "drastic" than making your own distro to slim down linux, and by complaining and not using them you're making very little sense at all.
I wouldn't worry. I built my own distro around Glibc 2.1. When I upgraded to glibc 2.2 I had literally *no* problems at all. The fact that it didn't come with libdb threw me for a loop, but you can download and install that that seperately.
I signed up for the beta awhile ago, and said I was running linux for my OS since they said they'd eventually have a linux client. Well, I just got accepted, but I see only Windows stuff and I'm not too keen on downloading 600MB over a 56k just to see if it has the linux client. Is there currently a linux client? If so, where can I get it? I want to play the game, but I'd like to see it now before I become a paying customer after the linux client actually comes out.
Golly, you sure seem like you think you're right. Too bad you caren't. If you read the expo's rules, it said you are not allowed to hand out things anywhere but from your booth. Second, it is private property, so the ownership has the authority to do just that. That doesn't change the fact that it was funny or that MS a faux paus, but legally, the LUG was in the wrong.
I don't know what weird games you've been installing, but SimCity 3k, Quake III, and HeavyGear 2 all installed fine for me. As a matter of fact, I can't think of a single game that I've ever needed more than one library at most, and that library is usually SDL, so I only have to install it once.
Yes, you are correct, but that isn't the point. The GPL places the burden of distributing GPLed code on the distributor, not the creator, which is Transmeta in this case. They also have to include a copy of the GPL and information about how to get the source code within their distribution, neither of which they did.
Re:Mixed Response on This One
on
Congress@Work
·
· Score: 1
The Constitution isn't meant to be a restrictive document. "These are your only rights, no more, no less." It is designed to give people the freedom they need to create a sustainable government. There is a reason the US is the longest lived democracy. (as in, government by the governed, not specifically a democracy or a republic, etc)
Re:Mixed Response on This One
on
Congress@Work
·
· Score: 1
Technically, we have more rights than are enumerated in the Constitution itself. Read the ninth amendment.
Slashdot Mirror
In 2001 the first word is about twenty-five minutes into the film ("Here you are, sir. Main Level D."), and, in total, there is less than fourty minutes of dialogue. Most of the dialogue is trivial, too. Perhaps you should re-watch some of those, closer this time.
Maybe, you LOSER! HA! Go back to your BSD, Mr. Brad.
I used Galeon, which uses gecko to render stuff, so I don't know if these options actually exist in Mozilla. But, with Galeon, one can block images from a specific site. Why not just choose to block image from ad.doubleclick.net?
As men of breeding, sometimes men of wit,
T'avoid great errors must the less commit;
Neglect the rules each verbal critic lays,
For not to know some trifles is a praise.
Most critics, fond of some subservient art,
Still make the whole depend upon a part:
They talk of Principles, but Notions prize,
And all to one lov'd folly sacrifice.
Yes, I'm using them right now. I even have the card (a TNT2) overclocked using nvclock.
Says me, the founders of the US, and a whole boatload of philosophers. And people don't have a right to an education -- they have a right to learn. Also, I wasn't talking about the utilitarian value of *any* of this, like you seem to be. People are born with a right to speak freely; no government or other institution has the right to take that away from any of us. When they do, it is a crime against nature.
This is the egocentricity of the entirety of Englighenment thinking then. The right to speech exists INDEPENDENTLY of any government. Governments can choose to remove it, but they cannot choose to grant it because people have it when they are born.
Osu!
Sure, I'll gladly pay double what I paid for 2.4.12 for the next kernel!
Yeah, it does make your point if you ignore his justifications.
Just like Thomas Jefferson, who had a well known fear of public speaking? Boy, *that* guy was a moron!
CopyRIGHT laws have nothing to do with this. This is a matter of trademark law.
That would be funny. Intel's chips start selling better because their internals are now more like AMD's. The irony.
I only do this when I am actually logged in. (su -, that is, not just su). \[\033[0m\]--\[\033[1;31m\][\[\033[1;36m\]\u@\h\[\ 033[1;31m\]]\[\033[0m\]-\[\033[1;31m\][\[\033[1;33 m\]\w\[\033[1;31m\]]\[\033[0m\]-- \[\033[1;32m\] \$ \[\033[0m\]
Yeesh, that's aluminium, damn yank!
...
...
:-)
The Supreme Court would beg to differ. After the case Santa Clara County v. Southern Pacific Railroad Company, corporations were given the same rights as individuals under the fourteenth amendment. So, according to the Supreme Court, corporations are individuals. I think that sucks donkey balls, but until it goes to the court again (or there is an amendment -- not likely), we're stuck with it.
"Linux" isn't anything but a kernel. You can size a specific distribution however the hell you want, so I see no reason to complain. I built my own distro, and my /usr/share takes up 77M. Actually, my largest directory is /usr/src which takes up about 2GB right now. Of course, I there is the fact that I keep every source file to every program I've compiled, from the kernel, to glibc, to XFree86, to Blackbox. My point is, there are ways less "drastic" than making your own distro to slim down linux, and by complaining and not using them you're making very little sense at all.
I wouldn't worry. I built my own distro around Glibc 2.1. When I upgraded to glibc 2.2 I had literally *no* problems at all. The fact that it didn't come with libdb threw me for a loop, but you can download and install that that seperately.
As has been said before, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
I signed up for the beta awhile ago, and said I was running linux for my OS since they said they'd eventually have a linux client. Well, I just got accepted, but I see only Windows stuff and I'm not too keen on downloading 600MB over a 56k just to see if it has the linux client. Is there currently a linux client? If so, where can I get it? I want to play the game, but I'd like to see it now before I become a paying customer after the linux client actually comes out.
Golly, you sure seem like you think you're right. Too bad you caren't. If you read the expo's rules, it said you are not allowed to hand out things anywhere but from your booth. Second, it is private property, so the ownership has the authority to do just that. That doesn't change the fact that it was funny or that MS a faux paus, but legally, the LUG was in the wrong.
I don't know what weird games you've been installing, but SimCity 3k, Quake III, and HeavyGear 2 all installed fine for me. As a matter of fact, I can't think of a single game that I've ever needed more than one library at most, and that library is usually SDL, so I only have to install it once.
Yes, you are correct, but that isn't the point. The GPL places the burden of distributing GPLed code on the distributor, not the creator, which is Transmeta in this case. They also have to include a copy of the GPL and information about how to get the source code within their distribution, neither of which they did.
The Constitution isn't meant to be a restrictive document. "These are your only rights, no more, no less." It is designed to give people the freedom they need to create a sustainable government. There is a reason the US is the longest lived democracy. (as in, government by the governed, not specifically a democracy or a republic, etc)
Technically, we have more rights than are enumerated in the Constitution itself. Read the ninth amendment.